<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Douglas A. Turner, P.C.</title>
	
	<link>http://www.douglasturner.com</link>
	<description>Leading Colorado Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:28:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DTurnerComments" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="dturnercomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">DTurnerComments</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Comment on The Colorado Family Purpose Doctrine by Douglas Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2007/10/09/colorado-family-purpose-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insights.douglasturner.com/2007/10/09/the-family-purpose-doctrine/#comment-4401</guid>
		<description>Amber:

I do apologize, but it would not be appropriate to answer your question in an open forum nor do we have enough information to properly advise you.  If you would like to set an appointment, please call the office.

Thank you,

Douglas Turner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amber:</p>
<p>I do apologize, but it would not be appropriate to answer your question in an open forum nor do we have enough information to properly advise you.  If you would like to set an appointment, please call the office.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Douglas Turner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Colorado Family Purpose Doctrine by Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2007/10/09/colorado-family-purpose-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-4400</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insights.douglasturner.com/2007/10/09/the-family-purpose-doctrine/#comment-4400</guid>
		<description>Can a common law wife be sued under the Colorado Family Purpose Doctrine for medical bills? Common law marriage is not clearly defined in lawbooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a common law wife be sued under the Colorado Family Purpose Doctrine for medical bills? Common law marriage is not clearly defined in lawbooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landlords, Tenants &amp; Security Deposits by Douglas Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2007/05/18/landlords-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-4398</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insights.douglasturner.com/2007/05/18/landlords-tenants-security-deposits/#comment-4398</guid>
		<description>Katie:

Thank you for your question.  Unfortunately, we cannot answer a question like this in an open forum; and we also need to review the lease and speak with you.  

We offer an initial consultation for a flat fee of $200 and include up to, 2 hours of attorney time.  If you wish to proceed, please contact our office and set an appointment for an initial consulation.

Douglas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie:</p>
<p>Thank you for your question.  Unfortunately, we cannot answer a question like this in an open forum; and we also need to review the lease and speak with you.  </p>
<p>We offer an initial consultation for a flat fee of $200 and include up to, 2 hours of attorney time.  If you wish to proceed, please contact our office and set an appointment for an initial consulation.</p>
<p>Douglas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landlords, Tenants &amp; Security Deposits by Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2007/05/18/landlords-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-4397</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insights.douglasturner.com/2007/05/18/landlords-tenants-security-deposits/#comment-4397</guid>
		<description>We signed a lease in Denver and paid first month's rent, last month's rent and security deposit. The landlord informed us that he will be moving back into the house at the end of our lease (6/1) so we have not paid May's rent yet because we assumed it would be covered by the "last month's rent" we paid upfront. We understand that the security deposit will continue to be held. The landlord is insisting that the "last month's rent" is actually part of the security deposit and will be refunded to us and we owe rent for May. It does not state this in our lease. The lease does say "in the event that damages exceed the amount of the initial security deposit, the last month's rent may be used to cover these damages". What do we do now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We signed a lease in Denver and paid first month&#8217;s rent, last month&#8217;s rent and security deposit. The landlord informed us that he will be moving back into the house at the end of our lease (6/1) so we have not paid May&#8217;s rent yet because we assumed it would be covered by the &#8220;last month&#8217;s rent&#8221; we paid upfront. We understand that the security deposit will continue to be held. The landlord is insisting that the &#8220;last month&#8217;s rent&#8221; is actually part of the security deposit and will be refunded to us and we owe rent for May. It does not state this in our lease. The lease does say &#8220;in the event that damages exceed the amount of the initial security deposit, the last month&#8217;s rent may be used to cover these damages&#8221;. What do we do now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Colorado Beneficiary Deeds vs. Colorado Quitclaim Deeds To Avoid Probate:  A Comparison by Douglas Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2008/01/09/using-colorado-beneficiary-deeds-vs-colorado-quit-claim-deeds-to-avoid-probate/comment-page-1/#comment-4393</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasturner.com/2008/01/09/using-colorado-beneficiary-deeds-vs-colorado-quit-claim-deeds-to-avoid-probate/#comment-4393</guid>
		<description>No.  Most powers of attorney are invalid once the principle dies.

Douglas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  Most powers of attorney are invalid once the principle dies.</p>
<p>Douglas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FAQs About Colorado NFA Trusts by Douglas Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2010/03/15/faqs-about-colorado-nfa-trusts/comment-page-1/#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasturner.com/?p=257#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>Scott:

The trust is the way to go for many reasons.  Please give me a call and we can discuss the differences.

FYI:  I believe it is a Title II weapon sold by a Class III dealer, if you want to be technically correct.  

Thank you!

Douglas Turner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott:</p>
<p>The trust is the way to go for many reasons.  Please give me a call and we can discuss the differences.</p>
<p>FYI:  I believe it is a Title II weapon sold by a Class III dealer, if you want to be technically correct.  </p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>Douglas Turner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FAQs About Colorado NFA Trusts by Scott Kovacs</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2010/03/15/faqs-about-colorado-nfa-trusts/comment-page-1/#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kovacs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasturner.com/?p=257#comment-4227</guid>
		<description>Hello.  I am looking at possibly setting up a NFA trust here in Colorado.  Could you explain the "timeline" of what I will be looking at after establishing a NFA trust with you, to transfering my first NFA device?  
  I have had the option of forming an LLC in Co to transfer a class II weapon explained to me briefly also.  As I am aware that these 2 processes are completely different, with 2 diffeerent outcomes, which would be the more reasonable way to go if one was mainly interested in transfering a Class II weapon.  Thanks for any info you can pass on.  
Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.  I am looking at possibly setting up a NFA trust here in Colorado.  Could you explain the &#8220;timeline&#8221; of what I will be looking at after establishing a NFA trust with you, to transfering my first NFA device?<br />
  I have had the option of forming an LLC in Co to transfer a class II weapon explained to me briefly also.  As I am aware that these 2 processes are completely different, with 2 diffeerent outcomes, which would be the more reasonable way to go if one was mainly interested in transfering a Class II weapon.  Thanks for any info you can pass on.<br />
Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Colorado Beneficiary Deeds vs. Colorado Quitclaim Deeds To Avoid Probate:  A Comparison by DeAnn Boyles</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2008/01/09/using-colorado-beneficiary-deeds-vs-colorado-quit-claim-deeds-to-avoid-probate/comment-page-1/#comment-4226</link>
		<dc:creator>DeAnn Boyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasturner.com/2008/01/09/using-colorado-beneficiary-deeds-vs-colorado-quit-claim-deeds-to-avoid-probate/#comment-4226</guid>
		<description>Mr. Turner,
Does a General Power of Attorney, inclusive of real property powers, negate the need for a beneficiary deed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Turner,<br />
Does a General Power of Attorney, inclusive of real property powers, negate the need for a beneficiary deed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landlords, Tenants &amp; Security Deposits by Douglas Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2007/05/18/landlords-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-4163</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insights.douglasturner.com/2007/05/18/landlords-tenants-security-deposits/#comment-4163</guid>
		<description>Marv:

Thank you for your inquiry.  However, we cannot answer specific questions in an open forum nor can we do so without reading the rental/lease agreement.  I suggest finding a local lawyer in Pueblo to answer specific questions.

Regards,

Douglas Turner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marv:</p>
<p>Thank you for your inquiry.  However, we cannot answer specific questions in an open forum nor can we do so without reading the rental/lease agreement.  I suggest finding a local lawyer in Pueblo to answer specific questions.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Douglas Turner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landlords, Tenants &amp; Security Deposits by Marv</title>
		<link>http://www.douglasturner.com/2007/05/18/landlords-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-4133</link>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insights.douglasturner.com/2007/05/18/landlords-tenants-security-deposits/#comment-4133</guid>
		<description>I have a question regarding the return of my security deposit.  I live in Pueblo CO.  When I moved in to the house, I paid $575.00 security deposit.  I surendered the premises to my landlord on 9/27/2011. I contacted my former landlord on 10/27/11 regardin the return of my deposit.  He stated that there would be some charges because there was a problem with the dishwasher and some plumming. On 12/06/11, 70 days after surendering the premesis, I sent the required certified letter demanding the return of the full deposit within 7 days or I would persue legal action and request Trebel damages. On 12/7/11, the landlord responded by sending me a check for $275.00 and a letter listing detailed charges.  My questions, do I still have grounds to sue in small claims court for the full amount or Trebel damages because I have waited for more than the required 60 day time limit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question regarding the return of my security deposit.  I live in Pueblo CO.  When I moved in to the house, I paid $575.00 security deposit.  I surendered the premises to my landlord on 9/27/2011. I contacted my former landlord on 10/27/11 regardin the return of my deposit.  He stated that there would be some charges because there was a problem with the dishwasher and some plumming. On 12/06/11, 70 days after surendering the premesis, I sent the required certified letter demanding the return of the full deposit within 7 days or I would persue legal action and request Trebel damages. On 12/7/11, the landlord responded by sending me a check for $275.00 and a letter listing detailed charges.  My questions, do I still have grounds to sue in small claims court for the full amount or Trebel damages because I have waited for more than the required 60 day time limit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

