<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:blogger='http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059</id><updated>2024-03-08T11:32:27.310-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Dan and Mike&#39;s Political Feedbag</title><subtitle type='html'>&quot;Goring the Other Guy&#39;s Ox Since 2003&quot;</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default?alt=atom'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default?alt=atom&amp;start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>87</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-9067220379759575442</id><published>2007-02-17T21:37:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2007-02-17T21:37:50.401-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Climatetologists Shouldn&#39;t be Economists (or Political Scientists)</title><summary type="text">This image was taken from one of the previous issues of The Economist.  Basically the graph compares California and other &quot;blue states&quot; (as defined as supporting John Kerry in the previous election), compared to the &quot;red states&quot; as defined by those that voted for George Bush.  Now, the Economist, as well as the source for this graph (http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/9067220379759575442'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/9067220379759575442'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2007/02/why-climatetologists-shouldnt-be.html' title='Why Climatetologists Shouldn&#39;t be Economists (or Political Scientists)'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-116899125532208568</id><published>2007-01-16T18:47:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-01-16T18:54:43.190-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Quote of the Year (so far)</title><summary type="text">&quot;Really, we&#39;re happy to be rich now,&quot; said Majid al-Mansouri, who heads the environment agency serving Abu Dhabi.That is from this journalistic abortion; article by the Associated Press about the United Arab Emirates and their topping of the world index of global footprints, by the World Wildlife Federation (Sorry, whenever I see WWF, I think wrestling).Al-Mansouri&#39;s comment pretty much sums up </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/116899125532208568'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/116899125532208568'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2007/01/quote-of-year-so-far.html' title='Quote of the Year (so far)'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-116303317361476000</id><published>2006-11-08T19:43:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-08T19:46:13.663-05:00</updated><title type='text'>I&#39;D LIKE TO THANK...</title><summary type="text">Yes, I know I haven&#39;t posted in forever, but I think I&#39;m turning over a new leaf with all of the political shenanigans going on in the past 24 hours.  With that, despite the fact that we now have a Speaker Pelosi and Chairman Kennedy, here&#39;s some things I&#39;m thankful for with the passing of the election...The good people of South Carolina, Tennessee, Colorado, Wisconsin, Virginia, South Dakota and</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/116303317361476000'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/116303317361476000'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/11/id-like-to-thank.html' title='I&#39;D LIKE TO THANK...'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-114239146930304362</id><published>2006-03-14T21:45:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-03-14T21:57:49.346-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Well, the Media is Just Too Easy a Target to Pass Up</title><summary type="text">I was standing in line at Chic-Fil-A when I saw this headline on the front page of &quot;The State&quot;Family struggles with baby’s deathAunt says nearby relatives had been trying to help couple raise childThen there was this first paragraph:After giving up her first three children, 25-year-old Kellie King wanted to raise her fourth child, Jeffrey, with the help of her family.She won’t get that chance.So </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/114239146930304362'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/114239146930304362'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/03/well-media-is-just-too-easy-target-to.html' title='Well, the Media is Just Too Easy a Target to Pass Up'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-114063685646069150</id><published>2006-02-22T14:25:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-22T14:34:16.530-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Google vs. the US vs. China</title><summary type="text">Apparently when you face a congressional committee set up to get their pound of flesh, you&#39;re not going to look good.  Google and Yahoo! Take a Beating&quot;Yeah, so what?&quot; you ask.  Here&#39;s the irony of it all...The Republican chairman of the committee, New Jersey&#39;s Chris Smith, then announced his intention to introduce a bill this week which would &quot;formalise the goals of a new State Department task </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/114063685646069150'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/114063685646069150'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/02/google-vs-us-vs-china.html' title='Google vs. the US vs. China'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113986398297205126</id><published>2006-02-13T15:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-13T15:53:06.726-05:00</updated><title type='text'>New Link on the Sidebar</title><summary type="text">Let&#39;s try this again...I&#39;ve added a new link on the sidebar, from Jane Galt (aka Asymmetric Information).  From what I&#39;ve seen of her front page, she seems like my small (but not stupid) government libertarian (ie she hasn&#39;t drunk from the Libertarian Party kool-aid).  So I&#39;ve added her to the trough and that should be all good.  I really like what she&#39;s written about the deficits, and much more </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113986398297205126'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113986398297205126'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/02/new-link-on-sidebar.html' title='New Link on the Sidebar'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113953298124636285</id><published>2006-02-09T19:20:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-14T13:20:20.836-05:00</updated><title type='text'>A Defense of Wal-Mart</title><summary type="text">This is going to be a response to what someone wrote online.  Here&#39;s the original post:http://louishopen.livejournal.com/39450.htmlI&#39;m going to do more of a point-by-point refutation of what he says, but considering that alot of his claims are what the general anti Wal-Mart proponents think, this will probably be a good start to addressing most of the concerns that people have against Wal-Mart.  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113953298124636285'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113953298124636285'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/02/defense-of-wal-mart.html' title='A Defense of Wal-Mart'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113951637673738369</id><published>2006-02-09T15:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-09T17:12:18.626-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Economics at its Finest</title><summary type="text">If this isn&#39;t economics, then I don&#39;t know what is:A GAME THEORETIC APPROACH TO THE TOILET SEAT PROBLEMSeriously, if people complain too much about the lack of &quot;serious&quot; theory work, then nobody is going to care about economics.  As it is right now, there&#39;s TOO much focus on math and theory and not nearly enough done with applying economics to the world around us.  If you want to be a data </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113951637673738369'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113951637673738369'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/02/economics-at-its-finest.html' title='Economics at its Finest'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113943390603892742</id><published>2006-02-08T16:14:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-08T16:25:06.076-05:00</updated><title type='text'>And They Want Statehood?</title><summary type="text">Well, the DC council already acts like a shady legislature, but this takes the cake:Dewey Wins!: Council revotes and passes leaseBut the question is whether MLB is going to accept all the codecils that the DC Council has added on.  Here&#39;s a list:To pay start up costs for a new youth baseball academy;To give 10,000 free tickets a year to low-income D.C. residents;To make community appearances each</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113943390603892742'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113943390603892742'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/02/and-they-want-statehood.html' title='And They Want Statehood?'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113891985383256495</id><published>2006-02-02T17:16:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-02T17:37:34.043-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Slowly but Surely, the Media Catches On</title><summary type="text">The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has a story written about how college loan payments are eating further into graduates&#39; current income.  Obviously, the government isn&#39;t going to do anything about this, they&#39;re making way too much money off it and federal student loans are forever, you have to repay them, even if you&#39;re disabled and living off Social Security.  Even if you go bankrupt, the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113891985383256495'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113891985383256495'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/02/slowly-but-surely-media-catches-on.html' title='Slowly but Surely, the Media Catches On'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113865417447209186</id><published>2006-01-30T23:07:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-01-30T23:07:17.393-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Insanely Liberal</title><summary type="text">Back when I was in high school, my girlfriend&#39;s father suggested that I read &quot;The Lexus and the Olive Tree&quot; by Thomas Friedman.  So I read it, or got around to reading it freshman year at Georgetown.  It was a pretty good book and didn&#39;t say too much about policy, more like it was a book about observations in the world today.  So Friedman got a Pulitzer for that book and went on to become an </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113865417447209186'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113865417447209186'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/01/insanely-liberal.html' title='Insanely Liberal'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113750612157037952</id><published>2006-01-17T08:52:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-01-17T08:55:21.586-05:00</updated><title type='text'>First thoughts from &quot;Stupid in America&quot;</title><summary type="text">I love it how Inez Tenenbaum was made to look like an idiot.  I really love how Democrats in South Carolina were made to look like idiots.Yes, Inez, we know that South Carolina is improving in every category.  It&#39;s easy to improve when you&#39;re starting from zero.  Now, if you&#39;d just be able to move past those educational juggernauts like Mississippi and Alabama, then you&#39;d be getting somewhere.  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113750612157037952'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113750612157037952'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/01/first-thoughts-from-stupid-in-america.html' title='First thoughts from &quot;Stupid in America&quot;'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113718377977283135</id><published>2006-01-13T15:17:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-01-13T15:22:59.786-05:00</updated><title type='text'>TGIF Friday Line Up</title><summary type="text">No, &quot;Family Matters&quot; and &quot;Full House&quot; aren&#39;t coming back to ABC, but John Stossel is.  In case you&#39;ve never read his work (I have), he&#39;s a journalist for ABC News and is probably the most unapologetic libertarian journalists out there.  So tonight, on 20/20, there will be a presentation called &quot;Stupid in America: How we are cheating our kids&quot;.  Here&#39;s  the blurb from the webpage:There are many </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113718377977283135'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113718377977283135'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/01/tgif-friday-line-up.html' title='TGIF Friday Line Up'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113717057304075650</id><published>2006-01-13T11:38:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-01-13T11:42:55.220-05:00</updated><title type='text'>While Joe Biden drones on about something</title><summary type="text">Dan and I (and Luisa) created a religion forum over in LiveJournal called....The Religious FeedbagGet it?  Political Feedbag = Religious Feedbag.  It&#39;s some good stuff.  I would&#39;ve liked to have it held here, but that&#39;s alright, the posts are still available for all the public to see, it&#39;s just that you can&#39;t comment without a LiveJournal account.  But that&#39;s alright.But as for here, that means </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113717057304075650'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113717057304075650'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2006/01/while-joe-biden-drones-on-about.html' title='While Joe Biden drones on about something'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113440680258542995</id><published>2005-12-12T11:46:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-12-12T12:00:02.626-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Just in Time for the Holidays</title><summary type="text">MSN has two articles up on how my generation is in debt to their eyeballs.  Right among an article about gadgets from $10 to $1000.  College Debts and Broken DreamsA couple of tidbits that struck me personally:&quot;This is the first generation who won&#39;t necessarily do better than their parents,&quot; says Tamara Draut, director of the economic opportunity program at Demos, a research and advocacy </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113440680258542995'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113440680258542995'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/12/just-in-time-for-holidays.html' title='Just in Time for the Holidays'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113376467982109704</id><published>2005-12-05T01:20:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-12-05T01:38:00.313-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Random Items to Leave On</title><summary type="text">Since I&#39;m leaving SC and my internet connection for a temporary paid position in Connecticut, I leave you these few things to ponder:Given the current political and social culture, what would be a realistic first step to pare back government?  Would it even be possible?  Is this required to be done within the two major parties or another party?  Would a new party need to be born or an exisiting &quot;</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113376467982109704'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113376467982109704'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/12/random-items-to-leave-on.html' title='Random Items to Leave On'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113330372429193180</id><published>2005-11-29T17:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-29T17:35:24.356-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Make Health Insurance Difficult?</title><summary type="text">Right Plan, Wrong StateI&#39;m not sure what the right policy for health insurance is, but making things more complicated isn&#39;t one of them.  My, admittedly not-so-well thought out plan is simple.Make everyone buy health insurance.  It&#39;s no different for using a car, so why should it be any different for using health services.Yes, yes.  I know there are big time difference between a person&#39;s health </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113330372429193180'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113330372429193180'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/11/why-make-health-insurance-difficult.html' title='Why Make Health Insurance Difficult?'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113226720189276061</id><published>2005-11-29T16:55:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-29T16:58:19.336-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Does Restricting Immigration Reduce Freedom?</title><summary type="text">Restricting Immigration Reduces FreedomDon Boudreaux is a libertarian economics professor at George Mason.  In fact, Cafe Hayek is a libertarian blog that two like-minded professors maintain there.  So I don&#39;t get why he doesn&#39;t understand how immigration restrictions can go hand in hand with liberty.The explaination is rather simple.  What happens WITHIN the borders of the United States is </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113226720189276061'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113226720189276061'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/11/does-restricting-immigration-reduce.html' title='Does Restricting Immigration Reduce Freedom?'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113322550092574601</id><published>2005-11-28T19:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-28T22:08:14.306-05:00</updated><title type='text'>50 Babies a Year are alive after abortion</title><summary type="text">50 Babies a Year are alive after abortionSweet merciful crap.  And that&#39;s not even the kicker.  Apparently, there&#39;s a two year old mentioned in the article who was born after THREE attempted abortions.  Needless to say, he&#39;s not in very good condition.  But if there&#39;s 50 screwed up abortions in the UK (and very much possibly more), then I wonder what the statistics are here in the US.  But the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113322550092574601'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113322550092574601'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/11/50-babies-year-are-alive-after.html' title='50 Babies a Year are alive after abortion'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113320553978796986</id><published>2005-11-28T14:18:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-28T14:18:59.860-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Marginal Product of Sports Columnists is Zero</title><summary type="text">Pardon the Quite FranklyEven though, I&#39;m a sports fan, I&#39;m not a fan of these shows.  I could just give a ranking of how each show should be in the pecking order of obnoxiousness, but that would be meaningless.For the most part, the author of this article has it right, although he misses on some points.First off, I&#39;d like to see this &quot;study&quot; that the grad student at Missou put out.  Right now, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113320553978796986'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113320553978796986'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/11/marginal-product-of-sports-columnists.html' title='The Marginal Product of Sports Columnists is Zero'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113234979330660601</id><published>2005-11-18T16:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-18T16:36:33.320-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Email</title><summary type="text">I&#39;ve decided that the Feedbag could use an email address.  Thus, the Political Feed(Mail)Bag is born.  Click the link on the sidebar below the archives to send us hate mail.  Or love.  Or porn.  Because that&#39;s what the internet is for.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113234979330660601'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113234979330660601'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/11/email.html' title='Email'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113167308548021930</id><published>2005-11-17T21:01:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-18T12:05:03.330-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Pro-family Policy</title><summary type="text">The Party of Sam&#39;s ClubI&#39;m only going to touch this briefly and make a general criticism.  You may reply in the comments box if you want me to go futher and deeper into this.The breakdown of the family has been a topic of conversation for more than 20 years now.  Divorce rates are up, numbers of single-parent families are up, the nuclear family has been thrown to the dustbin of history.  Or </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113167308548021930'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113167308548021930'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/11/pro-family-policy.html' title='Pro-family Policy'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113216819102327076</id><published>2005-11-16T14:07:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-16T14:09:51.040-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Moral Problems of Dining and Dashing</title><summary type="text">Briefly, I want to bring a question to everyone who reads this (yes, all nine of you).  I argued last night with Luisa that it was acceptable to not pay for a meal that was of God-awful quality.  Basically, I argued that if you got horrible food with horrible service, it would be ok to not pay your tab and just leave the restaurant.  (With the obvious intention of never coming back again).  Luisa</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113216819102327076'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113216819102327076'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/11/moral-problems-of-dining-and-dashing.html' title='The Moral Problems of Dining and Dashing'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113157269415834153</id><published>2005-11-09T16:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-09T16:44:54.160-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Troughs</title><summary type="text">We all know that you can&#39;t get enough of the Feedbag.  That is all 11 of you that read this every day.  But there are just some days that we don&#39;t write.  Ok, make that most days.  But that doesn&#39;t mean that you still can&#39;t get enough of your yummy political goodness.  And who better than Dan and I to show you what you should be reading.  Thus was born... The Troughs.  When the Feedbag isn&#39;t </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113157269415834153'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113157269415834153'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/11/troughs.html' title='The Troughs'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9102059.post-113105976725904723</id><published>2005-11-07T23:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-07T23:44:55.413-05:00</updated><title type='text'>A litigious society</title><summary type="text">Doping, Torts, and Monetary Damages(A moment of full disclosure:  I despise lawyers.  Society would be a million times better if we just got rid of the lot of them.  I lose respect for people who want to be lawyers or are lawyers.  I can&#39;t stand them.  I think the movie &quot;The Devil&#39;s Advocate&quot; was a pretty good representation of lawyers, except they didn&#39;t show as much greed or lying as would </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113105976725904723'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9102059/posts/default/113105976725904723'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://politicalfeedbag.blogspot.com/2005/11/litigious-society.html' title='A litigious society'/><author><name>Mike</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09474509066017707326</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>