<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>DataPortability on Social Networking</title>
	<description>DataPortability on Social Networking Feed Digest</description><link>http://app.feed.informer.com/digest3/4TENZLHV9C.html</link>
											<copyright>Respective post owners and feed distributors</copyright>
											<generator>http://feed.informer.com/</generator>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DataportabilityOnSocialNetworking" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
	<title>Re: [DataPortability-Public] Sending message from one social netwok to another</title>
	<description>
  You could do this a few ways. In facebook you could implement a plugin &lt;br&gt; that reads from an external database I think. Or you could have people &lt;br&gt; register on both social networks and then supply you with the &lt;br&gt; usernames and passwords, and then also confirm that people are the &lt;br&gt; same across the networks (i.e., identity / identification). There's
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/09edf7711729ee09/38c6d69a1e3d1bd1?show_docid=38c6d69a1e3d1bd1</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/09edf7711729ee09/38c6d69a1e3d1bd1?show_docid=38c6d69a1e3d1bd1?</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:33 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Sending message from one social netwok to another</title>
	<description>
  Hi everyone, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Is it not possible to send a text message from one social network to &lt;br&gt; another social network.. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;If I like to implement this, where can I start. Is it about using &lt;br&gt; OpenID or create a message store from the sender.Thanks
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/09edf7711729ee09/d48524defa12bbc1?show_docid=d48524defa12bbc1</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/09edf7711729ee09/d48524defa12bbc1?show_docid=d48524defa12bbc1?</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:43 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>DataPortability Research: invitation</title>
	<description>
  Hi everyone, &lt;br&gt; I am looking for people to join me in a new task force I will be proposing &lt;br&gt; to the Steering Group. &lt;br&gt; Essentially, I would like the DataPortability Project to use its &lt;br&gt; independence to create unique insight into the world - from how people use &lt;br&gt; social networking to what consumer recognition is of open standards. We will
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/6df2fb4bd14f7872/be2489443e2b34a3?show_docid=be2489443e2b34a3</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/6df2fb4bd14f7872/be2489443e2b34a3?show_docid=be2489443e2b34a3?</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:40 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Announcing the DataPortability.org EULA and TOS Task Force</title>
	<description>
  Announcing the DataPortability.org EULA and TOS Task Force &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Following the example of the Creative Commons, the goal of this task &lt;br&gt; force is to identify and name key concepts that help users and service &lt;br&gt; providers understand what each other expects. The output will be a &lt;br&gt; set of documents that can be referenced or included in EULA and TOS
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/80807f52e986c93e/1cf0b6018126abcc?show_docid=1cf0b6018126abcc</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/80807f52e986c93e/1cf0b6018126abcc?show_docid=1cf0b6018126abcc?</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:44 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: [DataPortability-Public] Re: Facebook data portability</title>
	<description>
  Hello, my name is Bryan, first time poster (or I haven't posted in a &lt;br&gt; good time here), I'm found more and more contributing to discussions &lt;br&gt; on open source manufacturing and automation discussion groups more &lt;br&gt; than anything else, but I do still pay attention to the computational &lt;br&gt; social networking issues of our time. I was approached by a banking
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/0efdcbcdca47728a/4c131ef09ad42e73?show_docid=4c131ef09ad42e73</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/0efdcbcdca47728a/4c131ef09ad42e73?show_docid=4c131ef09ad42e73?</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:59 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>foaf+ssl: a first implementation</title>
	<description>
  foaf+ssl is a very simple protocol to enable secure distributed social &lt;br&gt; networks. We have a first implementation &lt;br&gt; of it working, which I describe here &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/foaf_ssl_a_first_implementation"&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; This is important for data portability as it shows how one can allow &lt;br&gt; social networks to link to each other without necessarily needing the
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/819fc3980f353231/0d442e7136f68c1f?show_docid=0d442e7136f68c1f</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/819fc3980f353231/0d442e7136f68c1f?show_docid=0d442e7136f68c1f?</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:02 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>You don’t nor need to own your data</title>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;One of the biggest questions the &lt;a href="http://dataportability.org"&gt;DataPortability project&lt;/a&gt; has grappled with (and where the entire industry is not at consensus), is a fairly basic question with some profound consequences: who owns your data. Well I think I have an answer to the question now, which I’ve now cross-validated across multiple domains. Given we live in the Information Age, this certainly matters in every respect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So who owns “your data”? Not you. Or the other guy. Or the government, and the MicroGooHoo corporate monolith. Actually, no one does. And if they do, it doesn’t matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People like to conflate the concept of property ownership to that of data ownership. I mean it’s you right? You own your house so surely, you own your e-mail address, your name, you date of birth records, your identity. However when you go into the details, from a conceptual level, it doesn’t make sense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ownership of data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt; First of all, let’s define property ownership: "the ability to deny use of an asset by another entity". The reason you can claim status to owning your house, is because you can deny someone else access to your property. Most of us have a fence to separate our property from the public space; others like the hillbilly’s sit in their rocking chair with a shot gun ready to fire. Either way, it’s well understood if someone else owns something, and if you trespass, the dogs will chase after you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://flickr.com/photos/xplosive/133377798/"&gt;&lt;img alt="133377798_8c85d1f1a6_o" height="331" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3222/3033746793_847965c6a1.jpg" width="500"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The characteristics of ownership can be summed as&lt;/p&gt; ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DataPortability/~4/454856046" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DataPortability/~3/454856046/</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/dataportability">DataPortability.org Format Updates</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DataPortability/~3/454856046/?</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:23 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: Healthcare Constituencies [HCTF]</title>
	<description>
  At my company, we tend to view these constituencies as payers, &lt;br&gt; providers and research. Patients (or consumers) are an integral part &lt;br&gt; of each consitituency, to the point that you can't describe any of &lt;br&gt; those consitituencies without patients. While government is also &lt;br&gt; involved in payers, providers and research, it's just one of the
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/f79e96f6b83dd2cc/0fba45c1bb80d90b?show_docid=0fba45c1bb80d90b</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/f79e96f6b83dd2cc/0fba45c1bb80d90b?show_docid=0fba45c1bb80d90b?</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:24 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Auto-Filling a Profile when signing up to a new site</title>
	<description>
  Hi everyone, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I would like to ask if it is technically possible to do these tasks &lt;br&gt; like "Auto-Filling a Profile when signing up to a new site" or "Pre- &lt;br&gt; populating a job application form " using the data that are retrieved &lt;br&gt; from user profile. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Because, these data are running from a particular server. And the
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/4b4f2691325d27b6/dd2ad5dcaa676550?show_docid=dd2ad5dcaa676550</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/4b4f2691325d27b6/dd2ad5dcaa676550?show_docid=dd2ad5dcaa676550?</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:21 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: Data model for social graph</title>
	<description>
  Hi Steve, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thank you very much for your comment. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I did have a look at the social graph from Google, but I could not see &lt;br&gt; how the service actually work in Facebook or Twitter. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;So is it a wrong thing to ask if there is Social graph parser? Where &lt;br&gt; can I start to to play around with social graph? Can't we not
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/eb12cfe39a3fa727/c42a6196140d3858?show_docid=c42a6196140d3858</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/eb12cfe39a3fa727/c42a6196140d3858?show_docid=c42a6196140d3858?</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:03 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: [DataPortability-Public] Recommend Proposal and Request for Interested participants for Taskforce for Media and Publishing</title>
	<description>
  Interesting, thanks Daniela. &lt;br&gt; I imagine the efforts of Creative Commons would cover a lot of this. But I &lt;br&gt; think you raise a good point: personal information - the kind we debate &lt;br&gt; about on social networks as well as health - is merely only one side of the &lt;br&gt; data portability coin. The other side, is media - and to date, we've had
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/a8057bdbba334f69/08bf66ddae55fcec?show_docid=08bf66ddae55fcec</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/a8057bdbba334f69/08bf66ddae55fcec?show_docid=08bf66ddae55fcec?</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:47 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: Facebook data portability</title>
	<description>
  Of course there is also the issue that you're "friends" (lets not &lt;br&gt; forget to mention that social media has complicated this term) may not &lt;br&gt; want you "dumping" or "listing" or "using" their email addresses and &lt;br&gt; its unlikely that current Privacy Policies permit data controllers to &lt;br&gt; allow such processing of your friend's data in this way.
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/0efdcbcdca47728a/1ddac5ee8b079ca4?show_docid=1ddac5ee8b079ca4</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/0efdcbcdca47728a/1ddac5ee8b079ca4?show_docid=1ddac5ee8b079ca4?</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:54 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: Facebook data portability</title>
	<description>
  Of course there is also the issue that you're "friends" (lets not &lt;br&gt; forget to mention that social media has complicated this term) may not &lt;br&gt; want you "dumping" or "listing" or "using" their email addresses and &lt;br&gt; its unlikely that current Privacy Policies permit data controllers to &lt;br&gt; allow such processing of your friend's data in this way.
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/0efdcbcdca47728a/34ba1baecadd7c8b?show_docid=34ba1baecadd7c8b</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/0efdcbcdca47728a/34ba1baecadd7c8b?show_docid=34ba1baecadd7c8b?</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:52 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: [DataPortability-Public] Re: Data model for social graph</title>
	<description>
  Hi Thomas, Neil, &lt;br&gt; Are you looking for a ways to model the social graph on your own backend, &lt;br&gt; or asking about where the data is available? &lt;br&gt; M &lt;br&gt; On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Steven Greenberg &lt;
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/eb12cfe39a3fa727/a1c6a527d66172eb?show_docid=a1c6a527d66172eb</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/eb12cfe39a3fa727/a1c6a527d66172eb?show_docid=a1c6a527d66172eb?</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:12 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: [DataPortability-Public] Data model for social graph</title>
	<description>
  Facebook does have an API for fetching a list of a user's friends, but: &lt;br&gt; * It is only available for users who have "added" your application, or &lt;br&gt; for users that are trusted by the user you're making the request as. &lt;br&gt; * Facebook's Terms Of Service for the APIs are pretty strict about &lt;br&gt; creating external copies of data, so you'll want to review that
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/eb12cfe39a3fa727/efc564455395cebb?show_docid=efc564455395cebb</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/eb12cfe39a3fa727/efc564455395cebb?show_docid=efc564455395cebb?</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:48 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Data model for social graph</title>
	<description>
  Hi everyone, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I am looking for some tutorials to explain whether if it is possible &lt;br&gt; to retrieve a social graph from Facebook or other social networking &lt;br&gt; websites and save in in a database.. Is it there a data model for a &lt;br&gt; social graph. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I understand the concepts of using XFN but I just need to comfirm if I
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/eb12cfe39a3fa727/b3687b4b0fec63ab?show_docid=b3687b4b0fec63ab</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/eb12cfe39a3fa727/b3687b4b0fec63ab?show_docid=b3687b4b0fec63ab?</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:35 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: [DataPortability-Public] Re: Market segmentation data portability</title>
	<description>
  Its hard to create derivatives on data when the playing field is &lt;br&gt; levelled or you must use a standard segmentation. I am all for open &lt;br&gt; data but not so much on open standard segmentation. Fresh data and &lt;br&gt; more data is good but that's still a commodity business while &lt;br&gt; derivatives of data is not therefore should not be commoditzed via
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/2a8e44e5a9601c6c/27c06543bd8ecb8b?show_docid=27c06543bd8ecb8b</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/2a8e44e5a9601c6c/27c06543bd8ecb8b?show_docid=27c06543bd8ecb8b?</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:36 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Re: [DataPortability-Public] Market segmentation data portability</title>
	<description>
  Jim - &lt;br&gt; I'm not familiar with a common marketing segmentation standard, but it'd &lt;br&gt; be interesting to see something like it emerge. Much of the work we did &lt;br&gt; at matchmine was to encode user preferences into a portable profile that &lt;br&gt; could be leveraged by media distribution (or marketing) companies. &lt;br&gt; Segmentation was a profitable byproduct and I could see a focused effort
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/2a8e44e5a9601c6c/f77e66e7c99edc40?show_docid=f77e66e7c99edc40</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/2a8e44e5a9601c6c/f77e66e7c99edc40?show_docid=f77e66e7c99edc40?</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:09 GMT</pubDate>

</item>

<item>
	<title>Data Portability Job Opportunity - DO YOU HAVE A BEAUTIFUL MIND? (CTO/Technical Co-Founder)</title>
	<description>
  DO YOU HAVE A BEAUTIFUL MIND? &lt;br&gt; Seeking exceptional CTO/technical co-founder for social media start-up &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Do you want to disrupt the social media space? Do you believe that &lt;br&gt; someone has yet to bring a true sense of purpose, relevancy and broad- &lt;br&gt; scale yet efficient utility to social networking? Do you have a
  </description>
	<link>http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/3c75a6ade371d812/f0d46ff79fb7ce1a?show_docid=f0d46ff79fb7ce1a</link>
	<source url="http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml">DataPortability.Public.General Google Group</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groups.google.com/group/dataportability-public/browse_thread/thread/3c75a6ade371d812/f0d46ff79fb7ce1a?show_docid=f0d46ff79fb7ce1a?</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:05 GMT</pubDate>

</item>


</channel></rss>
