<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"> 

<channel>

<title>LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Daubert Legal News</title>

<link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/mealeys/news.aspx</link>

<description>Headline Daubert Legal News from LexisNexis®</description>

<language>en-us</language>

 

<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DaubertLegalNews" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/5fI5HoyayXo/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>5th Circuit Rehearing Denial Elicits Cries From Large Dissent</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW ORLEANS - An evenly split Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 14 denied en banc rehearing to a woman whose $3.5 million medical malpractice jury verdict a panel reversed 2-1 on grounds that the trial magistrate wrongly excluded defense expert testimony (Barbara and Rodney Huss v. John Overton Gayden, et al., No. 04-60962, 5th Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22563; See June 2009, Page 4). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 1 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 1%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/dUcCcOHxj0o/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>JNOV Not Appropriate Time To Reconsider Expert, Idaho High Court Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[BOISE, Idaho - A trial court wrongly reconsidered its prior admission of a plaintiff's expert testimony when it granted defendant doctors judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) in a medical malpractice case, an Idaho Supreme Court panel held Oct. 13 (Melinda Coombs v. Adrian Curnow, et al., No. 35157, Idaho Sup.; 2009 Ida. LEXIS 185). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 2 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 2%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/hEXwjqFgXx8/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Retroactive Birth Injury Analysis Admissible, Michigan Panel Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LANSING, Mich. - A pediatric neurologist properly used the process of elimination to determine when a baby suffered a stroke during delivery, a Michigan Court of Appeals panel held Sept. 10 in affirming his admission in a medical malpractice case (Teija McCall v. Spectrum Health Hospitals, et al., No. 279780, Mich. App.; 2009 Mich. App. LEXIS 1865). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 3 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 3%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/Odz7yrBRM8U/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Nerve Damage Expert Wrongly Excluded In Texas Malpractice Case</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas - A plaintiff's neurosurgeon expert was qualified to testify about nerve damage incurred during a spinal surgery, even though he had only assisted in performing such surgeries for the last decade, a 13th District Texas Court of Appeals panel held Sept. 30 (Beverly St. Clair v. Matthew T. Alexander, et al., No. 13-08-00218-CV, Texas App., 13th Dist.; 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 7682). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 4 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 4%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/k68IdXq4Ppk/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Nebraska Magistrate Judge: Nurse Isn't Qualified To Offer Opinion On Causation</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[OMAHA, Neb. - A federal magistrate judge in Nebraska on Sept. 21 issued an order granting summary judgment in favor of Covenant Care Midwest Inc. in a professional negligence action. The magistrate judge held that a nurse offered by the plaintiff as an expert witness is unqualified to render an expert opinion on cause of death (Shirley Peters, et al. v. Covenant Care Midwest Inc., d/b/a Nebraska Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation, No. 8:08cv00453, D. Neb.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86338). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 5 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 5%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/YxDX6krhGbY/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Expert, FDA Reports Allowed In As Evidence In Ethicon Stapler Case</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - An Arkansas federal judge on Sept. 23 denied a motion to exclude a plaintiff expert in an Ethicon Endo-Surgery stapler case and denied motions to preclude the use of adverse events reported to the federal government (Sharon Chism, et al. v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., et al., No. 08-341-WRW, E.D. Ark., W. Div.; See September 2009, Page 26). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 6 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 6%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/OynrLp6qbg0/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Federal Magistrate: Benzene Plaintiff's Expert Opinion Admissible Under Daubert</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[FRANKFORT, Ky. - A Kentucky federal magistrate judge on Sept. 28 ruled that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether a former tool-and-die maker with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was injured by his exposure to Safety-Kleen Systems Inc.'s benzene products and denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Donald Quillen v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc., No. 3:07-cv-00067-KKC, E.D. Ky.; See April 2009, Page 13). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 7 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 7%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/Q8lA3dWzhMw/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>California Benzene Plaintiff Argues Defendant Expert's Testimony Unreliable</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LOS ANGELES - A California state court benzene plaintiff argues in a Sept. 23 opposition brief to a summary judgment motion that the defendant's argument that exposure to benzene cannot cause the plaintiff's disease is not supported by admissible evidence (Frank Sundquist, et al. v. BP West Coast Products LLC, et al., No. BC 362023, Calif. Super., Los Angeles Co.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 8 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 8%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/qbKnvg-j678/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Judge: No Causal Link Between Benzene, Amines Exposure And Bladder Cancer</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LOS ANGELES - A federal judge on Sept. 9 held that a toxicologist has failed to establish a causal link between a handyman's exposure to benzene and aromatic amines in epoxy paints and the man's bladder cancer and, therefore, dismissed the man's case (Michael James O'Neill v. The Sherwin-Williams Company, No. EDCV-08-368-SGL, C.D. Calif.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92796). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 9 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 9%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/5idbmr1rYfk/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Doctor Not An Expert On Hospital Policies, Texas Panel Holds</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[EASTLAND, Texas - An emergency room physician is not qualified to opine that a hospital's failure to establish policies for its intensive care unit resulted in a woman's death following heart surgery, an 11th District Texas Court of Appeal panel held Oct. 8 (Hendrick Medical Center v. George Conger, No. 11-08-00036-CV, Texas App., 11th Dist.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 10 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 10%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/IA1RR1YyEBg/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Texas Panel Says Doctor Not Qualified On Nurse Standards Without Proof</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[AMARILLO, Texas - A doctor must do more than say he is qualified to testify regarding the standard of care provided by a nurse, a Seventh District Texas Court of Appeals panel held Sept. 29 in reversing a trial court decision to admit a plaintiff's expert (Weerachai Wiri, et al. v. Jeffrey Kimbrell, No. 07-09-0104-CV, Texas App., 7th Dist.) 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 11 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 11%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/X9kwQsuA6xw/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Admission Of Gang Expert Without Factual Findings Was Harmless Error</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[DENVER - A trial court abused its discretion in failing to make factual and reliability findings before admitting gang expert testimony from a police detective, but the error was harmless, a 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held Sept. 21 (United States of America v. Manuel A. Roach, No. 08-3029, 10th Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20916). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 12 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 12%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/LftbijVFnyU/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Expert's Description Of Possible Killer Not Based On Reliable Methods</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW CASTLE, Del. - A prosecution behavioral scientist's profile of a killer based on analysis of a double-murder scene does not meet admissibility requirements and must be excluded, a Delaware judge held Sept. 14 in an issue of first impression (State of Delaware v. Clifford Wright, No. 0801010328, Del. Super.; 2009 Del. Super. LEXIS 345). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 13 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 13%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/b8DjR7kAKYk/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Sexual Abuse Diagnosis Unfairly Prejudiced Defendant, Oregon High Court Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[SALEM, Ore. - A medical diagnosis that a child was sexually abused, in the absence of physical abuse, is inadmissible because it comments on the ultimate issue to be decided by the jury and it would be unfairly prejudicial to the defendant, the Oregon Supreme Court held Sept. 17 (State of Oregon v. Kermit Eugene Southard, No. SC S055463, Ore. Sup.; 2009 Ore. LEXIS 292). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 14 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 14%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/P7CUXKmnRbA/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Delayed Reporting Opinion Not Offered As Affirmative Evidence Of Abuse</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[SALEM, Ore. - A child sexual abuse expert's testimony that children often delay reporting abuse was not prejudicial and had a sufficiently reliable basis to be admitted, the Oregon Supreme Court held Sept. 30 in affirming a man's conviction (State of Oregon v. Justin Clark Perry, No. SC S055142, Oregon Sup.; 2009 Ore. LEXIS 289). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 15 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 15%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/0Ntlx7s0bUQ/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Sex Abuse Counselor Can Be 'Delay' Expert, Michigan Panel Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LANSING, Mich. - In order to opine that children sometimes delay reporting sexual abuse, an expert need not be an expert in the very narrow area of delay, only in the broader field of psychology and counseling, a Michigan Court of Appeals panel held Oct. 15 (People of the State of Michigan v. Jonathon Charles Bailey, No. 285638, Mich. App.; 2009 Mich. App. LEXIS 2143). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 16 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 16%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/IdDxBPBoHJ8/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Expert Lacks Foundation For Predictors Of Validity Of Sex Abuse Claims</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[KANSAS CITY, Kan. - A psychology expert presented no literature or studies supporting his opinion regarding children's disclosure of sexual abuse and his application of six discrete predictors of children's veracity, a federal judge in Kansas held Sept. 8 in excluding his testimony from a negligence suit. The action alleges that a foster care placement service negligently placed siblings in a home with an abusive teen (P.S. and C.S. v The Farm, No. 07-2210-JWL, D. Kan.; 2009 U.S. Dist. 81447). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 17 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 17%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/nE20ynln8iE/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Incidence Of Crashes Involving Icing Conditions Allowed In Cessna MDL</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[KANSAS CITY, Kan. - An aeronautics professor can testify regarding accident statistics involving icing of Cessna 208 planes, the Kansas federal judge overseeing the Cessna products liability multidistrict litigation held Sept. 30 (In re: Cessna 208 Series Aircraft Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1721, Case No. 05-md-1721-KHV, D. Kan.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91396; See September 2009, Page 13). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 18 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 18%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/w0mMOnzOop0/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Probable Cause Opinions Speak To Ultimate Fact, Kansas Federal Judge Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[KANSAS CITY, Kan. - Testimony from plaintiff and defense loss prevention experts regarding probable cause is inadmissible in a case alleging false arrest/imprisonment that stemmed from an alleged retail theft of a bra, a federal judge in Kansas held Sept. 21 (Krystle Carter v. J.C. Penney Corp., No. 08-2409-CM/DJW, D. Kan.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86421). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 19 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 19%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/8i3dwP-qS-Q/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Restaurant Safety Opinion Lacked Objectivity, Was Common Sense, U.S. Judge Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[TRENTON, N.J. - A regional restaurant executive lacked any expertise in safety, and his opinion that a casino violated standards when its employees left a wheelchair in an aisle near a buffet was purely subjective, a federal judge in New Jersey held Sept. 9 in excluding his testimony (Cynthia and Frank Lasorsa v. Showboat: The Mardi Gras Casino, et al., No. 07-4321 [JBS/JS]; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81948). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-10 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 20 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-10 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 20%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/Y_IAxw7SO68/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Child Murder Conviction Overturned For Expert Exclusion, Confrontation Error</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[DALLAS - A Texas Fifth District Court of Appeals panel on Aug. 28 reversed a nanny's conviction for the murder of one of her charges, finding that the trial court's exclusion of a cabinet-maker's testimony was error and that admission of DNA test results violated her rights under the confrontation clause (Ada Betty Cuadros-Fernandez v. State of Texas, No. 05-06-01464-CR, Texas App., 5th Dist.; 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 6896). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 1 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 1%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/I0Ae2AGewrw/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>D.C. Judge Failed To Consider Eyewitness I.D. Expert Before Exclusion</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C. - A trial court applied incorrect legal principles and nearly adopted a per se rule of exclusion when it barred an eyewitness identification expert from testifying for the defense in a murder-kidnapping trial in which the sole evidence was witnesses' identification, a District of Columbia Court of Appeals panel held Sept. 3 (Raymond L. Benn v. United States of America, No. 03-CF-946, D.C. App.; 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 384). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 2 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 2%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/yqwsqPDMq9Q/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Suit Against Law Firm, Experts Resurrected For Improper Expert Exclusion</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[BOSTON - A man suing his law firm and his expert over their performance in underlying litigation should not have been barred because of a low response rate from presenting expert survey testimony that supported his original claim, a Massachusetts Appeals Court panel held July 14 (Harvey Albert v. Albert P. Zabin, et al., No. 08-P-889, Mass. App.; 2009 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 572). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 3 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 3%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/AyslmTUbfIk/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>11th Circuit OKs Exclusion Of Damages Opinion On Hospital Group's Turbocharging</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ATLANTA - Expert testimony on the damages caused to a hospital by another hospital chain's overcharging for Medicare reimbursements was overly broad because it went beyond the liability theory, the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held Sept. 4 in affirming its exclusion (Boca Raton Community Hospital v. Tenet Health Care Corp., No. 07-14352, 11th Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19952). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 4 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 4%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/VYh70FbIHIc/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Economist Needed To Verify Source Of Business Loss Data, Federal Judge Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[WILMINGTON, Del. - An expert who used a strategic business plan for the basis for his antitrust damages estimate must be excluded because he did not verify the data underlying the plan, a federal judge in Delaware held Aug. 20 (ZF Meritor, et al. v. Eaton Corp., No. 06-623-SLR, D. Del.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74180). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 5 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 5%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/HCrGgL7pfBQ/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>New York Federal Judge Nixes Damages Expert From Pepsi Contract Suit</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - A former bottling company manager's assessment of damages to a Peruvian Pepsi distributor from unauthorized sales in its territory lacks any reliable basis and is built upon "one baseless flawed assumption after another," a federal judge in New York held Sept. 9 in excluding his testimony (Compania Embotelladora del Pacifico v. Pepsi Cola Co., No. 00 Civ. 7677 [JSR], S.D. N.Y.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81376). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 6 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 6%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/OZ3qcfLtFkU/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>1st Circuit: Land Value Expert Lacked Support For Development Potential</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[BOSTON - A trial judge correctly excluded an expert's valuation of land being taken by the federal government because he lacked support for his conclusion that the protected coastal property would be rezoned for residential development or that sand could be extracted and sold, a First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held Sept. 11 (United States of America v. 33.92356 Acres of land, et al., No. 08-2263, 1st Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20291). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 7 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 7%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/YtZmrMuV03k/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>3rd Circuit Resurrects Employer's Claim Of Proprietary Secrets Theft</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - A New Jersey federal judge wrongly limited an engineer's testimony regarding proprietary information and reverse engineering in the rubber molding industry on grounds that he lacked experience in the specific sub-industry at issue in the proprietary secrets case, a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held July 30 (Thomas &amp; Betts Corp. v. Richards Manufacturing Co., et al., Nos. 08-3117, 08-3269, 3rd Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16837). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 8 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 8%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/GC_s6oRAlEg/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Federal Judge In Kansas: Aircraft Safety Can't Be Predicted With Graph</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[KANSAS CITY, Kan. - A forensic weather analyst's attempt to predict a plane's relative safety by plotting aircraft data on a graph is untested and not generally accepted, a federal judge in Kansas held Sept. 9 in barring his testimony in the Cessna products liability multidistrict litigation (In re: Cessna 208 Series Aircraft Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1721, Case No. 05-md-1721-KHV, D. Kan.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81932). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 9 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 9%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/bAtUmyEhdyI/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Michigan Panel Affirms $2.5M Verdict For PIP Insurance Benefits</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LANSING, Mich. - An anesthesiologist was qualified to testify about the necessity of pain management injections to a woman's face, and his treatment protocol was generally accepted and reliable, a Michigan Court of Appeals panel held Aug. 25 (Sheri M. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., No. 277096, Mich. App.; 2009 Mich. App. LEXIS 1763). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 10 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 10%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/bpRhiBe5TF8/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>New Jersey Court Finds Nurse Expert May Offer Opinion On Causation</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[TRENTON, N.J. - The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division on Aug. 4 reversed a trial court ruling that a nurse may not offer expert testimony in a nursing home negligence cause of action. The appeals court found that the nursing expert may testify as to causation and standard of care in a nursing home but affirmed the trial court order regarding the medical diagnosis for a wrongful death claim (Louise Detloff, et al., v. Absecon Manor Nursing Center and Rehabilitation Center, No. A-5941-07T2, N.J. Super., App. Div.; 2009 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2088). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 11 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 11%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/yVHoiNDw4VU/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Investigation Based On National Fire Standards Reliable, Federal Judge Holds</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LEXINGTON, Ky. - A fire causation expert relied on reliable national fire investigation standards in ruling out all other possible causes of a house fire and in determining that a Hitachi television caused the blaze, a federal judge in Kentucky held Aug. 20 (Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hitachi Home Electronics [America], Inc., No. 3: 08-30-DCR, E.D. Ky., Central Div.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73998). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 12 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 12%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/l3SYG3hZ9a0/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Alcohol-Detection Bracelet Meets Admissibility Standard, S.D. High Court Concludes</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PIERRE, S.D. - The methodology underlying an alcohol-monitoring ankle bracelet and the expert opinion on its results are sufficiently reliable to pass muster under Daubert, the South Dakota Supreme Court held Sept. 16 in affirming its admission in a probation revocation proceeding (State of South Dakota v. Neal J. Lemler, No. 24815, S.D. Sup.; 2009 S.D. LEXIS 156). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 13 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 13%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/1dw_jf9bqcA/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>New York Judge Allows Zoloft Causation Opinion In Defense Of Assault Charges</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[HEMPSTEAD, NY - A New York trial judge on Aug. 21 stood by her earlier decision to allow defense expert testimony in an assault trial that the antidepressant Zoloft can cause excessive aggression in some people (State of New York v. Brandon W. Hampson, No. 2006NA021294, N.Y. Dist., 1st Dist., Nassau Co.; 2009 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2182). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 14 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 14%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/VyAQeLerNVg/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Special Master Chided; Compensation Ordered For Hepatitis B Petitioners</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C. - Saying the special master "cloaked" a causation finding as an assessment of an expert's credibility not subject to review, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ordered compensation for three of five previously rejected petitioners who claimed that the hepatitis B vaccine caused autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), in an opinion released Sept. 8 (Claudia Rotoli v. Secretary, No. 99-644V; David Myers v. Secretary, No. 99-631V; Colleen Torbett v. Secretary, No. 99-660V; Mona Porter v. Secretary, No. 99-639V; Allison Hager v. Secretary, No. 01-307V, Fed. Clms.; 2009 U.S. Claims LEXIS 299). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 15 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 15%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/8tXVyN9_KT4/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>U.S. Judge Says Heart Doctor's Opinion On Surgery Length Lacked Reliable Methods</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - A pediatric heart surgeon did not rely on appropriate studies or scientific data in forming his opinion that a defendant surgeon's deviation from normal procedures during a boy's operation caused liquid to form around his lungs and ultimately caused his death, Pennsylvania federal judge held Aug. 21 (Robert Daddio, et al., v. A.I. DuPont Hospital for Children of the Nemours Foundation, et al., No. 05-441, E.D. Pa.; 2099 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74834). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 16 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 16%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/4c4YrwkkVkk/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Delaware High Court: Chrysotile Asbestos Testimony Properly Admitted</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[WILMINGTON, Del. - A judge properly admitted expert testimony that supported a man's claim that exposure to the chrysotile asbestos in the brakes on Ford Motor Co. automobiles led to his mesothelioma, a divided Delaware Supreme Court affirmed Aug. 24 (General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. v. Roland Leo Grenier Sr., Nos. 453,2007, 578,2007, Del. Sup.; 2009 Del. LEXIS 438; See April 2009, Page 9). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 17 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 17%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/A3LIx3dLrc0/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Plaintiff Asks 6th Circuit To Order Daubert Transcripts Added In $21 Million Appeal</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CINCINNATI - Welder Jeff Tamraz and his wife, Terry, said Jan. 20 that manufacturer defendants violated Federal Rule of Appellate Procedures 10(b)(2) by failing to include all the evidence in their appeal of the $20.7 million judgment against them; the manufacturers responded Jan. 30 that they followed procedures and the rule violation claim is without merit (Jeff Tamraz, et al v. Lincoln Electric Co., et al., No. 08-4015, 6th. Cir.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 18 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 18%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/NkdOAH-3I7I/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Nonfungal Infection Expert Excluded In MoistureLoc MDL</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHARLESTON, S.C. - The sole nonfungal eye infection general causation expert in the MoistureLoc contact lens solution multidistrict litigation was excluded Aug. 26 when a South Carolina federal judge found that her opinion is "built on an unsupported hypothesis, and is thus fundamentally flawed and must be excluded" (In Re: Bausch &amp; Lomb Contact Lens Solution Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1785, No. 2:06-MN-77777-DCN, D. S.C., Charleston Div.; See July 2009, Page 28). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 19 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 19%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/BiAKNIX9gFU/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Summary Judgment Denied In Ethicon Stapler Case</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - An Arkansas federal judge on Aug. 27 denied summary judgment in an Ethicon Endo-Surgery stapler case, finding a question of fact about whether the device was used and allowing a plaintiff expert's testimony about causation (Sharon Chism, et al. v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., et al., No. 08-341, E.D. Ark.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 20 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 20%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/nVeOjst_reQ/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>2 Suicide Causation Experts Stay In MDL Case</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[BOSTON - Two plaintiff experts can testify about Neurontin's alleged role in a man's suicide - including admission of a "psychological autopsy," the judge in the federal Neurontin multidistrict litigation ruled Aug. 14 in denying exclusion and across-the-board summary judgment (In Re: Neurontin Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1629, No. 04-10981, Ruth Smith, et al. v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 05-11515, D. Mass.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 21 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 21%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/e-NxEkMUqHg/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Fosamax Jaw Injury Claims For Short-Term Use Survive As MDL Allows 2 Experts</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - Twenty-four plaintiffs who claim to have developed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) after using Fosamax for less than three years can go forward with their cases because the federal multidistrict litigation court on Sept. 9 allowed the general causation testimony of two of three plaintiff experts (In Re: Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1789, No. 06-md-1789, S.D. N.Y.; See August 2009, Page 14). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 22 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 22%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/Qdar5rhdKzQ/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Zyprexa Expert, Doctor Admissible In MDL Death Case, But Lilly Alleges 'Sham'</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[BROOKLYN, NY - Eli Lilly and Co. on Sept. 11 asked the judge overseeing the Zyprexa multidistrict litigation to reconsider his Aug. 28 ruling admitting a plaintiff's causation expert in a diabetes death case, saying a post-deposition affidavit is a contradictory "sham" (In Re: Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1596, No. 04-md-1596, Arlene Earl, et al. v. Eli Lilly &amp; Company, No. 07-3912, E.D. N.Y.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78567). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 23 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 23%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/nGSa9vTQOYY/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Benzene Plaintiff: Experts Used Same Methodology As Defense Experts</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LUFKIN, Texas - A former plumber/pipe fitter, who is alleging before a Texas federal court that exposure to benzene in the defendants' chemical products caused him to suffer injury, argues in an Aug. 27 sur-reply that the opinions of his medical experts are reliable and that the experts relied on the same literature and methodology that the defendants' experts used (Lewis E. Knapper, et al. v. Safety Kleen Systems, Inc., et al., No. 9:08-cv-00084-TH, E.D. Texas; See August 2009, Page 22). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 24 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 24%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/H_OmPdkUmjY/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Shell Oil Defends Industrial Hygienist's Opinion On Dermal Exposure</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[HOUSTON - Shell Oil Co. is arguing before a Texas federal court in a Sept. 3 sur-reply that its industrial hygienist expert in a benzene exposure case cannot be excluded because he did not employ the same methodology as the plaintiff's expert (Ben N. Brown, Sr. v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 08-CV-413, S.D. Texas; See August 2009, Page 23). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-9 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 25 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-9 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 25%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/DX7K-7K6Ma4/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Shaken Baby Conviction Overturned For Failure To Hold Daubert Hearing</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[FRANKFORT, Ky. - A trial court abused its discretion in judicially noticing the reliability of shaken baby syndrome (SBS) diagnoses and in denying a defendant a Daubert hearing to determine SBS's admissibility, a Kentucky Court of Appeals panel held Aug. 14 (David Lamar Hamilton IV v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, No. 2008-CA-000300-MR, Ky. App.; 2009 Ky. App. LEXIS 138). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 1 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 1%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/OwErA30GQNI/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Viagra Vision MDL 'Effectively Ended' With Causation Expert's Exclusion</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[MINNEAPOLIS - In a ruling that effectively ends the Viagra multidistrict litigation, a Minnesota federal judge on Aug. 19 granted Pfizer Inc.'s second challenge to the plaintiffs' last remaining general causation expert after additional discovery found problems in the underlying data of his independently published study linking Viagra with non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) (In Re: Viagra Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1724, No. 06-md-1724, D. Minn.; See April 2008, Page 13). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 2 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 2%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/SQMn_1wWchE/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>New Judge Overturns Exclusion Of Prozac Murder / Suicide Expert Testimony</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - A new judge in a federal Prozac murder/suicide case reconsidered the previous judge's expert admissibility ruling on July 21 and reversed the decision (Mark Gilbert Rimbert, et al. v. Eli Lilly and Company, No. 06-874, D. N.M.; See October 2008, Page 8). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 3 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 3%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/1hK_S_kZI60/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Turf Expert Not Qualified To Opine On Sports Injury, S.D. High Court Rules</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PIERRE, S.D. - The South Dakota Supreme Court on July 8 affirmed a $500,000 award to a man who injured his knee during a football team's promotional event, finding that the trial judge did not err in barring a turf specialist from opining about medical causation (James Klutman, et al. v. Sioux Falls Storm, No. 24835, S.D. Sup.; 2009 S.D. LEXIS 98). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 4 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 4%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/mFV0fxpuRTw/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Amtrak Wins Bid To Bar Carpal Tunnel Experts, Summary Judgment In Illinois</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHICAGO - A federal judge in Illinois on Aug. 18 excluded expert testimony from two treating physicians and an ergonomist on grounds they failed to explain the methodology underlying their opinions that a railroad worker's job duties caused his carpal tunnel syndrome (Craig Meyers v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., No. 08 C 540, N.D. Ill., Eastern Div.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72850). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 5 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 5%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/p9HgX0MK1Ug/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Minnesota Appeals Court Affirms Inadequate Causation Rulings In HRT Lawsuit</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ST. PAUL, Minn. - The Minnesota Court of Appeals on July 21 upheld a trial court judge's decision to award summary judgment to Wyeth after finding that a woman failed to provide sufficient scientific evidence to support her contention that ingesting hormone replacement therapy for nearly 20 years caused her to develop breast cancer, because the judge did not err in concluding that the woman's experts were not qualified and because the experts' specific causation theories were not reliable (Patricia Zandi v. Wyeth, et al., No. A08-1455, Minn. App.; 2009 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 785). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 6 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 6%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/jTUr-GLdIHc/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Doctors' Say-So Not Enough To Link Splint To RSD Development</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LANSING, Mich. - A trial judge properly excluded two doctors who opined that an emergency room physician applied a splint too tightly to a woman's injured lower leg because they failed to provide any methodology explaining how they arrived at their opinion, a Michigan Court of Appeals panel held Aug. 4 (Rosemary and David Smoter v. Nancy Z. Lockhart, et al., No. 283986, Mich. App.; 2009 Mich. App. LEXIS 1635). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 7 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 7%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/AVpG5KKyfAY/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Aredia / Zometa MDL Judge Denies Summary Judgment In 10 Jaw Injury Cases</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NASHVILLE, Tenn. - The judge in the Aredia/Zometa multidistrict litigation on Aug. 13 denied defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. summary judgment on failure to warn and general causation in 10 cases but also denied the plaintiffs summary judgment barring evidence of alternative causes of their alleged injuries (In Re: Aredia and Zometa Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1760, No. 06-1760, M.D. Tenn., Nashville Div.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 8 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 8%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/Z6zB_u2BgX8/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Without Experts, Defense Summary Judgment Granted In Neb. Anoxic Dementia Suit</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NORTH PLATTE, Neb. - A hazardous waste plant worker seeking to recover for anoxic dementia he alleges was caused by exposure to hydrogen sulfide in drums of phosphorus pentasulfide failed to meet his causation burden to sustain a strict liability burden, a federal magistrate judge in Nebraska said Aug. 11 (Dave Barrett, et al. v. Rhodia Inc., No. 07-5014, D. Neb.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 9 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 9%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/GIQk5Bkiw2Y/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Most Experts Allowed In Fosamax MDL</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - Fourteen of 15 experts for the plaintiffs and the defense in the Fosamax multidistrict litigation will be allowed to testify, a New York federal judge ruled July 27 (In Re: Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1789, No. 06-md-1789, S.D. N.Y.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64661; See May, 2009, Page 9). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 10 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 10%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/7chDjxJyENk/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Pfizer: Plaintiffs' Experts' Scientific Theories Don't Pass Daubert Muster</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - Pfizer Inc. filed a motion July 17 in the Southern District of New York to exclude key plaintiffs' medical experts in securities litigation, saying their opinions about the company's painkillers Bextra and Celebrex, which underlie the shareholder litigation, are not scientifically reliable (In re Pfizer Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 04-9866, S.D. N.Y.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 11 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 11%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/9V5s814KbVY/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Causal Link Between Fumigant, Seaman's Injuries Unsupported, La. Panel Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW ORLEANS - A seaman's expert lacked literature to support his opinion linking exposure to aluminum phosphide to long-term injuries, a Fourth Circuit Louisiana Court of Appeal panel held July 29 (John Versluis v. Gulf Coast Transit Co., et al., No. 2008-CA-9729, La. App., 4th Cir.; 2009 La. App. LEXIS 1458). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 12 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 12%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/AyzVZJQ1pxE/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Federal Judge Rules No Link Between Benzene Exposure And APL</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[BOSTON - The proffered testimony of a toxicology expert that benzene exposure can cause acute promoyelocytic leukemia (APL) is unreliable under Daubert, a Massachusetts federal judge ruled July 31 (Brian K. Milward, et al. v. Acuity Specialty Products, et al., No. 07-cv-11944, D. Mass.; See June 2009, Page 13). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 13 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 13%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/rp8nYAPD31g/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Testimony Linking Benzene And Myelofibrosis Survives Daubert Challenge</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on July 15 ruled that expert testimony linking a former tank truck driver's benzene exposure and myelofibrosis is admissible under Daubert (Malcolm Louis LeBlanc, et al. v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al., No. 05-5485, E.D. La.; See August 2008, Page 8). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 14 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 14%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/4VfLJGcqt8E/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Plaintiff: Expert's Use Of Differential Diagnosis Admissible Under Daubert</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[FRANKFORT, Ky. - A benzene-exposure plaintiff argues in a July 15 reply brief that his general causation expert's use of the differential diagnosis method in coming to the conclusion that exposure to benzene in Safety-Kleen's solvents caused the plaintiff's myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is admissible under Daubert (Donald Quillen v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc., No. 3:07-cv-00067-KKC, E.D. Ky.; See April 2009, Page 13). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 15 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 15%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/leuea-4Wve8/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Texas Benzene Plaintiff Says Testimony On Benzene Evaporation Rate Is Reliable</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LUFKIN, Texas - A benzene exposure plaintiff argues in an Aug. 7 brief before a Texas federal court that the testimony of his chemical engineer and certified industrial hygienist regarding the plaintiff's cumulative benzene exposure is scientifically reliable under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (509 U.S. 579 [1993]) (Lewis E. Knapper, et al. v. Safety Kleen Systems, Inc., et al., No. 9:08-cv-00084-TH, E.D. Texas). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 16 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 16%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/cZ77ECyGuFU/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Benzene Plaintiff Argues Defense Expert Unqualified To Testify On Dermal Exposure</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[HOUSTON - A benzene exposure plaintiff on Aug. 3 moved to exclude the testimony of the defendants' putative industrial hygiene expert, arguing that his opinions regarding the plaintiffs' dermal exposure levels to benzene are inadmissible under Daubert (Ben N. Brown, Sr. v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 08-CV-413, S.D. Texas). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 17 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 17%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/m9L5lkkcQXY/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Pennsylvania High Court Says Nurses May Testify As To Causation</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[HARRISBURG, Pa. - The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Middle District, on June 15 held in a divided opinion that a nurse may offer a medical opinion as an expert under the state's liberal standard regarding expert testimony. The decision overruled a longstanding precedent in Flanagan v. Labe (547 Pa. 254, 690 A.2d [1997]), in which the high court determined that nurses were limited by the state's Professional Nursing Law, which prohibits nurses from making a medical diagnosis (Rodger A. Freed v. Geisinger Medical Center, et al., No. 77 MAP 2007, Pa. Sup., Mid. Dist.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 18 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 18%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/mVRolmRgbV0/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Double-Murder Conviction Reversed; Barefoot Insole Impression Science Unreliable</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[COLUMBIA, S.C. - A trial judge properly allowed prosecutors to subpoena a murder defendant's barefoot insole impression consultant to bolster the state's claim that the science was valid, the South Carolina Supreme Court held Aug. 10. However, as it held in the defendant's first appeal, the high court said barefoot insole impression evidence is still unreliable and inadmissible (State of South Carolina v. Jeffrey Louis Jones, No. 26699, S.C. Sup.; 2009 S.C. LEXIS 328). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 19 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 19%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/jC7GHkz3JHM/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>10th Circuit Affirms Fingerprint Admission, Suggests More Research</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[DENVER - Although fingerprint analysis does not meet all of the Daubert admissibility factors, a 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found July 20 that it is sufficiently reliable to be admissible (United States of America v. Robert Abdul Baines, No. 08-2098, 10th Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15945). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 20 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 20%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/LYYQfirm4QM/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Challenges To DNA Testing Equipment Not Grounds For Experts' Exclusion</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LINCOLN, Neb. - The Nebraska Supreme Court on July 10 rejected a defendant's arguments that DNA testing equipment was invalid and rendered expert testimony about test results inadmissible (State of Nebraska v. Christopher A. Edwards, No. S-07-678, Neb. Sup.; 2009 Neb. LEXIS 112). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 21 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 21%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/7z2GWAMwuwk/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Firearms Expert Need Not Have Specific Rifle Experience, U.S. Judge Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[SPOKANE, Wash. - A plaintiff's handgun expert has sufficient firearms expertise to testify regarding the cause of a firing accident involving a bolt-action rifle, a federal judge in Washington held July 20 (Kasey E. Jones v. Weatherby, No. CV-08-210-JLQ, E.D. Wash.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62211). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 22 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 22%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/OliCDQx2Amw/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Suicide-By-Cop Theory Reliable, 9th Circuit Holds; Expert Properly Admitted</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO - A trial judge did not err in finding reliable the theory underlying "suicide by cop," a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held Aug. 7 (Marylon Boyd, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al., No. 07-16993, 9th Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. 17615). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 23 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 23%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/nnZgf-hg2OM/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Opinion On Sex Abuse Victims' Behavior Relevant, Reliable, Texas Panel Holds</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[HOUSTON - A psychologist's testimony that some child sexual abuse victims behave normally around their abuser was properly admitted because it was based on his experience and was relevant and reliable, a 14th District Texas Court of Appeals panel held July 30 (Steven Briones v. State of Texas, No. 14-07-01047-CR, Texas App., 14th Dist.; 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 5944). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 24 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 24%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/oEdl8wT6QYs/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Biomechanics' Head Injury Opinion Reliable, Relevant, Federal Judge Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[MIAMI - A biomechanical engineer is qualified to testify that a cruise ship passenger was knocked to the ground during an attack with sufficient force to cause mild to moderate brain injury, a federal judge in Florida held July 2 (Craig Berner v. Carnival Corp., No. 08-22569-CIV-ALTONAGA/Brown, S.D. Fla.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63399). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 25 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 25%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>
 
<item>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DaubertLegalNews/~3/njPHycJ5Ats/articleSearch.do</link>
<title>Patent Experience Insufficient For Opinion On Malpractice In Patent Application</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[FRANKFORT, Ky. - A patent attorney with 40 years of experience is not qualified to testify about legal malpractice in the patent application process, a federal judge held July 30 in excluding the opinion and granting the defendant law firm partial summary judgment (Steven E. Byrne v. Wood, Herron &amp; Evans, No. 2:08-102-DCR, E.D. Ky., Northern Div.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66557). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=13-8 Mealey's Daubert Rep. 26 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2013-8 Mealeys Daubert Rep. 26%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>

</rss>
