<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Defense Tech</title> <link>http://defensetech.org</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DefenseTech" /><feedburner:info uri="defensetech" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>DefenseTech</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDefenseTech" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDefenseTech" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDefenseTech" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/DefenseTech" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDefenseTech" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDefenseTech" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDefenseTech" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><item><title>Pics of the Day: HMS Liverpool Shadows Russia’s Carrier</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/RyevOMt4wv0/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/09/pics-of-the-day-hms-liverpool-shadows-russias-carrier/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:47:32 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Crazy Ivan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16362</guid> <description>Here’s a great image that looks like it was almost taken from a Cold War-themed video game. It shows the soon-to-be retired British Type 42 destroyer HMS Liverpool shadowing Russia’s only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, as the slavic ship transits through the English channel during a recent patrol that marked the closest a Russian naval task [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=RyevOMt4wv0:w_McX_2jf1M:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/RyevOMt4wv0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/09/pics-of-the-day-hms-liverpool-shadows-russias-carrier/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>29</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/09/pics-of-the-day-hms-liverpool-shadows-russias-carrier/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Navy Moving Ahead With Railgun Devo</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/XtHVO2xlhek/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/09/navy-moving-ahead-with-railgun-devo/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Fire for Effect]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category> <category><![CDATA[navy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16358</guid> <description>Here’s a little story that’s been making the Internet rounds lately; the Navy is about to take one more step toward making high-powered railguns a ship-board reality. Yup, the Office of Naval Research is about to start test firing a BAE Systems-built railgun and another made by General Atomics (watch a badass video of the [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=XtHVO2xlhek:Xeenr1_X6Y4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/XtHVO2xlhek" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/09/navy-moving-ahead-with-railgun-devo/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>32</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/09/navy-moving-ahead-with-railgun-devo/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Video: The Latest, Terrifying Drone Dog</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/x9GTf9Ulpao/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/08/video-the-latest-terrifying-drone-dog/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:07:13 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bizarro]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16353</guid> <description>Remember DARPA’s BigDog? You know, the terrifying, four-legged robot that won’t fall over when kicked or when walking on ice and snow. Well, DARPA and Boston Dynamics (the guys who are also working on this) are testing an upgraded version of the dog that will carry 400 pounds of gear for more than 20 miles [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=x9GTf9Ulpao:A___ksYuXog:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/x9GTf9Ulpao" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/08/video-the-latest-terrifying-drone-dog/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>101</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/08/video-the-latest-terrifying-drone-dog/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Eye Candy: China’s New Armored Vehicles</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/4Qmyaguu5Ng/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/07/eye-candy-chinas-new-armored-vehicles/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:00:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[China Rising]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16344</guid> <description>Here are your pics of the day; they show China’s latest infantry fighting vehicle equipped with new, thicker bolt-on armor up close and in action. These new tracs appear to be part of China’s new class of armored vehicles that recently entered service as an eventual replacement of the older Type 86 and 89 armored [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=4Qmyaguu5Ng:9eFfzwXrfn4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/4Qmyaguu5Ng" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/07/eye-candy-chinas-new-armored-vehicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>114</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/07/eye-candy-chinas-new-armored-vehicles/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>UK and France Desperate to be Included in Mid East Ops?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/_ew3IsUjhrQ/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/07/uk-and-france-desperate-to-be-included-in-mid-east-ops/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:11:12 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category> <category><![CDATA[navy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16340</guid> <description>“Britain had to plead with US to take part in Iran flotilla” This headline from Britain’s telegraph newspaper shouldn’t shock anyone who has been following the latest developments of the British military. Yup, both Britian and France apparently insisted on being included in the Pentagon’s military task force that is in the Middle East with [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_ew3IsUjhrQ:MhIHNv9X35s:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/_ew3IsUjhrQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/07/uk-and-france-desperate-to-be-included-in-mid-east-ops/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>89</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/07/uk-and-france-desperate-to-be-included-in-mid-east-ops/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Did Chinese Espionage Lead to F-35 Delays?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/H5N2i2dOXjQ/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/06/did-chinese-espionage-lead-to-f-35-delays/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:33:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyber Security Center]]></category> <category><![CDATA[F-35 Watch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category> <category><![CDATA[JSF Watch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16336</guid> <description>Did Chinese cyber spying cause the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter’s cost spikes and production delays? That’s the question Pentagon budget officials are asking according to Aviation Week. Chinese spies apparently hacked into secure conference calls and listened to meetings discussing the classified technologies aboard the jets. In particular, China may have stolen info about the [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=H5N2i2dOXjQ:GkN1uzuqGKc:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/H5N2i2dOXjQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/06/did-chinese-espionage-lead-to-f-35-delays/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>213</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/06/did-chinese-espionage-lead-to-f-35-delays/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Meet North Korea’s Latest Drone</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/sYXmvmP3m7w/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/06/meet-north-koreas-latest-drone/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:07:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Bizarro]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Those Nutty Norks]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16331</guid> <description>As Iran and China and who knows who else scrambles to unlock the secrets of the U.S. Air Force’s stealthy RQ-170 Sentinel drone, North Korea is moving to reverse engineer some 1970s-vintage target drones. Yup, South Korea’s Yonhap news agency is reporting that the North has bought up old MQM-107D Streaker target drones from Syria [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=sYXmvmP3m7w:sCoZsDRghTo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/sYXmvmP3m7w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/06/meet-north-koreas-latest-drone/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>34</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/06/meet-north-koreas-latest-drone/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Army Eying the K-MAX for Tactical Airlift?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/CsN5cFeFM7s/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/03/army-eying-the-k-max-for-tactical-airlift/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:02:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[army]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rotary Wing]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16326</guid> <description>Check this out. We’ve been wondering how the cancellation of the C-27J Joint Cargo Aircraft would impact the Army’s tactical airlift needs. While the Air Force says canning the JCA won’t hurt anyone, it looks like the Army is eying the optionally-manned K-MAX helo to carry realatively small but urgent loads of cargo to remote [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=CsN5cFeFM7s:ZHDYvhY2H3Y:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/CsN5cFeFM7s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/03/army-eying-the-k-max-for-tactical-airlift/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>40</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/03/army-eying-the-k-max-for-tactical-airlift/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Friday Eye Candy: China’s Newest Attack Helo</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/g7not_xDTBw/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/03/friday-eye-candy-chinas-newest-attack-helo/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:28:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[China Rising]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16320</guid> <description>Check out these latest photos of China’s newest attack helo, the Z-19. The twin-seat bird, an updated version of the Z-9W that’s been in service since the 1990s, is just one more example of China’s military modernization. If the chopper’s lines look vaguely familiar, it’s because the bird is based on the Eurocopter Dauphin series, [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=g7not_xDTBw:di9mAs3Z0mk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/g7not_xDTBw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/03/friday-eye-candy-chinas-newest-attack-helo/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>129</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/03/friday-eye-candy-chinas-newest-attack-helo/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Meet the Air Force’s Newest X-Plane</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DefenseTech/~3/_B7B_1lpSVU/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/02/meet-the-air-forces-newest-x-plane/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:13:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16315</guid> <description>Aviation Week dropped a heck of a story yesterday when it revealed the Air Force’s newest X-plane, the X-56A. The the flying wing is being designed by Lockheed Martin’s Skunkworks to test out the technologies that will allow a new crop of reconnaissance planes to stay aloft at high altitudes for long periods of times; think days or weeks. [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:TzevzKxY174"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?i=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?a=_B7B_1lpSVU:YQHLWpZtxgQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DefenseTech?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DefenseTech/~4/_B7B_1lpSVU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/02/meet-the-air-forces-newest-x-plane/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>27</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/02/meet-the-air-forces-newest-x-plane/</feedburner:origLink></item> </channel> </rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/25 queries in 0.015 seconds using apc
Object Caching 1056/1101 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-09 23:15:32 -->

