Our Editors’ Choices this week include an excellent overview of corpus building that is a useful pedagogical resource, and also a post that considers the dichotomy of breadth and depth as approaches to digital humanities professional development. We have also included CFPs, reports, and resources, including the abstract book from the DH2025 conference. 

See full post.

The motto “Building Access and Accessibility, Open Science to all Citizens” was inspired by the 2002 Budapest Open Access Declaration, but also by a commitment to make visible several questions regarding accessibility needs (physical and digital). The Declaration amplified the aim of making research more widely available and free to anyone with internet access. Lately, Open Science or Open Scholarship have reframed concepts such as openness, access and accessibility from a technical and ethical perspective, taking into consideration data, infrastructure, and/or collaboration. National, international, or organizational manifestos, statements, declarations, principles, and policies related to scholarly objects, practices or methods are being formulated to improve and accelerate research through increased transparency, collaboration, and a more inclusive access to scientific knowledge of our societies. 

See full post.

See full post.

1. Exploring how generative AI provides new opportunities to support people in open-ended creative tasks in domains ranging from design and communication to science and education.
2. Identifying unique challenges in integrating AI into creative workflows, which could lead to design fixation and idea homogeneity, and raise issues of content copyright and authorship.

See full post.

See full post.

In line with the EPSRC AREA framework for responsible research and innovation, the Digital Humanities Climate Coalition recommends using the tool to reflect on how project design, delivery, and reporting might Anticipate, Reflect on, Engage with, and Act to mitigate the environmental impacts of Digital Humanities work.

See full post.

See full post.

In 2026, Digitorium is focused on the theme of Preserve. As Digital Humanists, we engage in so many levels of preservation, and we want to make space to explore and document that work. Digital Humanities is a field committed to uncovering and preserving culture and society that is hidden. Sometimes hidden means time, as in ancient artifacts being unearthed and digitally preserved. Sometimes hidden means marginalized, as in documenting experiences and events outside of the mainstream archive.  Preservation is a foundational value that facilitates access to artifacts and stories that are otherwise in danger of extinction. 

Preserve has a deeper meaning today. The office of Digital Humanities at the National Endowment for the Humanities and Digital Humanities Quarterly both celebrate 20-year anniversaries in the coming year. Our field is much older than 20, but we are still grappling with what can sometimes feel an insurmountable obstacle: how do we preserve a digital humanities project?  

Join us at Digitorium September 10-12, 2026, where we will be exploring these ideas and working together to formulate some answers. We invite you to share your experiences around the idea of Preserve. What have you been working to preserve, and what methodologies and strategies have you employed along the way?  And what are your thoughts on creating sustainable digital projects that will last the test of time, so that generations of users will be able to learn from the work you are completing? We are excited to spend this time with you all, working towards this common goal.

See full post.

Our Editors’ Choices this week address misconceptions surrounding ADA Title II, consider the theoretical frameworks that undergird mapping practices in DH, and highlights a new mobile tool for visualizing archival documents using AR. We also have multiple CFPs, as well as useful resources including a network visualizer for scholarly citations.