<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>debug</category><category>xml</category><category>books online</category><category>windows server 2008</category><category>msdn</category><category>reports</category><category>sql server 2000</category><category>personal</category><category>memory management</category><category>sql server katmai</category><category>dynamic</category><category>optimizer</category><category>best practices</category><category>community</category><category>migration</category><category>Database Professionals</category><category>sql server engine</category><category>memory</category><category>diskpart</category><category>service pack</category><category>sp2</category><category>sql server</category><category>2005</category><category>virtual server</category><category>sqliosim</category><category>devdays</category><category>sql server 2008</category><category>io</category><category>teched</category><category>Visual Studio Team Edition for Database Professionals</category><category>limitation</category><category>powershell</category><category>service pack 3</category><category>visual studio 2005</category><category>service pack 2</category><category>windows</category><category>t-sql programming</category><category>database engine</category><category>performance</category><category>bpa</category><category>hotfix</category><category>counters</category><category>sql server 2005</category><category>blogs</category><category>vista</category><category>windows vista</category><title>EXEC dbo.LongTermMemory__Archive</title><description>My long term memory for SQL Server related information.</description><link>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>369</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Dis4easSqlBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="dis4eassqlblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-734957862130612835</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-16T16:55:53.889+02:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">personal</category><title>This blog will move</title><atom:summary>For reasons that may be clear from the address this blog will move to http://blogs.msdn.com/wesleyb/.I hope you will all continue to read my blog on this new address!</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/71qqC80aV_4/this-blog-will-move.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/71qqC80aV_4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/05/this-blog-will-move.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-303838665949845105</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-08T20:46:07.037+02:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">windows server 2008</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2008</category><title>SQL Server 2008 Performance</title><atom:summary>SQL Server 2008 has not yet been released but nevertheless there are already some test results from the CTP versions. Do note that the performance will probably improve even more when the final product arrives but the results today are already quite amazing. They can be found on https://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/benchmarks.aspx.Apart from the performance improvements you get by </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/Dez29t0V-pI/sql-server-2008-performance.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/Dez29t0V-pI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/05/sql-server-2008-performance.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-9050767298413825767</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-28T10:00:11.783+02:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">hotfix</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">service pack 3</category><title>Self-Service Hotfixes</title><atom:summary>Those of you who read my blog regularly may have noticed the previous post and maybe more important the comments on this post.Somehow I think we were not the only ones having this questions and remarks. As a follow-up please read the following blog posts as they are very relevant to the discussion.First of all there is the Self-Service hotfix which is explained here. This allows you to download </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/sw3nf3EQU2s/self-service-hotfixes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/sw3nf3EQU2s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/04/self-service-hotfixes.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-8258125028618023659</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-17T20:51:21.845+02:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">service pack 2</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">hotfix</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">service pack 3</category><title>SQL Server 2005 SP2 Cumulative Hotfix Packages and SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 3</title><atom:summary>The guys @ Microsoft have been busy improving the quality of SQL Server even more.First of all CU7 was released (Build 3239) here.As usual this means CU8 has been announced here.I know there has been a lot of requests from the customers to release Service Pack 3 for SQL Server 2005. Although I see the benefits in the Incremental Servicing Model many people like the "certainty" of a good old </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/lMkUnAsSc7g/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/lMkUnAsSc7g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/04/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-4892291404089566201</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-15T20:21:24.976+02:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">t-sql programming</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server engine</category><title>Table Variable vs Parallelism</title><atom:summary>There are many myths surrounding table variables and one of the most common is probably the 'in memory' story. There are however a couple of other interesting facts about temp variables which you should also know about. The guys from the Storage Engine have an excellent post about table variables so you definitely have to read it. One of the things that caught my eye in the post was the fact that</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/WYww53UieOo/table-variable-vs-parallelism.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/WYww53UieOo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/04/table-variable-vs-parallelism.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-7157738016588794206</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-05T08:47:01.894+02:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">community</category><title>SQL Server Area</title><atom:summary>It looks like I maybe convinced another (ex) colleague to start blogging.Welcome to the blogginghood Egon ;-)</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/TPrP2PCyARs/sql-server-area.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/TPrP2PCyARs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/04/sql-server-area.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-6724319605288370346</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-19T20:23:07.150+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server engine</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">io</category><title>How many files should my database have?</title><atom:summary>A question I get asked quite a lot is "how many files / filegroups should my database have?". As we all know there is only one right answer to all of life's questions and that is: "it depends!". Lucky for us the guys from the SQLCAT team have taken the time to explain a little how to evaluate how many files you need for specific workloads. In the first post they talk about OLAP environments and </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/QrNL9ixmhco/how-many-files-should-my-database-have.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/QrNL9ixmhco" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/03/how-many-files-should-my-database-have.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-3881661166186847921</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-06T20:52:46.143+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">community</category><title>Techdays 2008 - Belgium</title><atom:summary>The Techdays (and launch event) are coming pretty close so get ready for some nice sessions about SQL Server 2008, Windows 2008, Visual Studio 2008, Hyper-V and more!You can always pay me a visit at the Euricom stand. Tip: There will be "champagne" on Thurday ;-)</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/zug2n9z2HZk/techdays-2008-belgium.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/zug2n9z2HZk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/03/techdays-2008-belgium.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-6524434897814022262</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-20T10:53:39.534+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server katmai</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2008</category><title>SQL Server 2008 February CTP (CTP6)</title><atom:summary>In case you have not noticed, the February CTP is out there!Go get it!</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/3l-3N2e2HfQ/sql-server-2008-february-ctp-ctp6.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/3l-3N2e2HfQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/02/sql-server-2008-february-ctp-ctp6.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-7126198191035116113</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-20T16:26:33.005+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">service pack 2</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">hotfix</category><title>SQL Server 2005 SP2 Cumulative Hotfix Package 7 - Announced</title><atom:summary>With every release comes a new announcement of course.http://support.microsoft.com/kb/949095/</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/P1de989jCt8/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix_19.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/P1de989jCt8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/02/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix_19.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-7868725419679159363</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-20T16:23:54.601+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">service pack 2</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">hotfix</category><title>SQL Server 2005 SP2 Cumulative Hotfix Package 6 - Released</title><atom:summary>It is out there!  The build number is 3228.http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946608/</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/Ef7HeLT7BBw/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/Ef7HeLT7BBw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/02/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-1542507621916520572</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-16T10:27:21.626+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2000</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><title>Mainstream support on SQL Server 2000 SP4 &amp; SQL Server 2005 SP1</title><atom:summary>One last reminder that the mainstream support for SQL Server 2000 SP4 and SQL Server 2005 SP1 will end on 08/04/2008.For more information about this visit the guys from Microsoft SQL Server Release Services.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/MpLzRFss2j0/mainstream-support-on-sql-server-2000.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/MpLzRFss2j0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/02/mainstream-support-on-sql-server-2000.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-6897414754867681420</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-05T21:13:15.361+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">windows server 2008</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">windows vista</category><title>Windows Server 2008 RTM</title><atom:summary>This time I am not just trying to draw your attention to this post, it has really RTM'ed!More information here.Together with the announcement of Windows Server 2008 they have also announced Windows Vista SP1 here.They will probably be available somewhere next month so just a little more patience.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/l-GZL-d1LGk/windows-server-2008-rtm.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/l-GZL-d1LGk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/02/windows-server-2008-rtm.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-9086475431624412406</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-04T22:00:19.235+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">community</category><title>SQLCAT Site</title><atom:summary>The nice people from the SQL Server Customer Advisory Team have started a new website called SQLCAT.com.It is a great source of information for large SQL Server implementations so make sure to check it out!</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/I-rqBIPBxDU/sqlcat-site.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/I-rqBIPBxDU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/02/sqlcat-site.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-7712438842175721699</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-09T13:26:44.643+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">community</category><title>Remembering Ken Henderson</title><atom:summary>Some sad news on this blog. Ken Henderson was one of the SQL Server gurus who wrote wonderful books and had a real passion for SQL Server. We will sure miss him in the community. My condolences to his family, friends and colleagues. We will see you in the next life khen1234 :'(Update: Ken's sisters have asked for stories about Ken you would like to share.  Please check out this post for more </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/GSGdVfJDXJg/remembering-ken-henderson.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/GSGdVfJDXJg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/01/remembering-ken-henderson.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-3797463003723261989</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-26T13:56:34.390+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server katmai</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2008</category><title>SQL Server 2008 RTM</title><atom:summary>I got your attention didn't I?Unfortunately the news in this post is not as good. The guys from the Data Platform Insider blog posted a 'Roadmap Clarification' for SQL Server 2008 and I am afraid it has a sad statement: "Microsoft is excited to deliver a feature complete CTP during the Heroes Happen Here launch wave and a release candidate (RC) in Q2 calendar year 2008, with final Release to </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/Av1Hghj5N9g/sql-server-2008-rtm.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/Av1Hghj5N9g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/01/sql-server-2008-rtm.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-1699893089436943893</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-21T20:58:36.156+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><title>SQL Server 2005 Best Practices Analyzer (January 2008)</title><atom:summary>In case you have not noticed yet, the SQLCat team has released a new version of the Best Practices Analyzer.  Among other things it contains 60+ new rules and the Analysis Services rules have been updated so they match the Best Practices warnings in BIDS 2008.More information can be found here and the download can be found here.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/r9i76_jECX0/sql-server-2005-best-practices-analyzer.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/r9i76_jECX0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/01/sql-server-2005-best-practices-analyzer.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-2344275082035901992</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-12T10:20:01.111+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server katmai</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2008</category><title>A question about and answer to the MERGE Statement and the CLR version in SQL Server 2008</title><atom:summary>I was giving a presentation on the new programmability features in SQL Server 2008 when the following question popped up:"Does the MERGE statement support multiple WHEN MATCHED clauses?"As you know it is possible to say "WHEN MATCHED AND myField = 0 THEN...", so it would make sense to have multiple WHEN MATCHED statements because depending on the criteria you could have different actions. Since </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/vyyKKZ7Ztf4/question-about-and-answer-to-merge.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/vyyKKZ7Ztf4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/01/question-about-and-answer-to-merge.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-2680346036345613681</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-04T21:36:58.505+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">service pack 2</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">hotfix</category><title>SQL Server 2005 SP2 Cumulative Hotfix Package 6 - Announced</title><atom:summary>Because CU5 is released here is the next announcement.The question is of course how many of you have already implemented CU5?</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/m4v2L84VTVw/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/m4v2L84VTVw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2008/01/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-4514941335274127419</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-12-19T09:38:40.366+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">service pack 2</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">hotfix</category><title>SQL Server 2005 SP2 Cumulative Hotfix Package 5 - Released</title><atom:summary>It is out there!  The build number is 3215.http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943656/</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/W3iakf0lvXU/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/W3iakf0lvXU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2007/12/sql-server-2005-sp2-cumulative-hotfix.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-391496546579653956</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-12-10T21:55:41.413+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">t-sql programming</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server engine</category><title>EXEC AT</title><atom:summary>With every release there are really some features that you seem to miss, maybe because they are small or maybe because you just do not use that functionality that often.That is how I recently stumbled upon a nice feature that has been added in SQL Server 2005 but I had never seen before.EXEC AT allows you to execute queries on a linked server just like OPENQUERY and OPENROWSET but with a little </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/ZDTXaaHTMZk/exec-at.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/ZDTXaaHTMZk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2007/12/exec-at.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-8426755354353311649</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-12-04T15:25:17.649+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">books online</category><title>SQL Server 2005 Books Online (September 2007)</title><atom:summary>Because I have a day off my colleague said I should stop working and blog something.Since inspiration comes mostly at work I will keep this one simple.The updated Books Online for SQL Server 2005 are available here.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/d5I884Y-jQA/sql-server-2005-books-online-september.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/d5I884Y-jQA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2007/12/sql-server-2005-books-online-september.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-2397021119049883214</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-26T21:43:24.870+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2005</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server engine</category><title>Sequential GUIDs</title><atom:summary>Today we found a table that was perfect for testing the newsequentialid() default. My colleague killspid thought it might be useful to talk about it and said "Blog it!".This new feature has been added to SQL Server 2005 although it was available in SQL Server 2000 with the addition of an extended stored procedure written by Gert Drapers.The Books Online state the following for the newsequentialid</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/m132Jf0G29I/sequential-guids.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/m132Jf0G29I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2007/11/sequential-guids.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-7511724341131573362</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-20T21:35:14.738+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server katmai</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2008</category><title>Some new features in SQL Server 2008 - November CTP</title><atom:summary>First of all I am very glad that 2 of my requests seem to have made it to SQL Server 2008:Cumulative waitstats info https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=275212A central registered server list https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=136596Of course there is a lot more in this CTP 5 and the first thing you will notice is</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/dfnx5bDkLAU/some-new-features-in-sql-server-2008.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_zYp_d1uSOeg/R0M8eet-1zI/AAAAAAAAAAs/4X3Ner1201o/s72-c/sql2008install.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/dfnx5bDkLAU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2007/11/some-new-features-in-sql-server-2008.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5941051.post-2248783842912993724</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-19T21:22:25.878+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server katmai</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sql server 2008</category><title>SQL Server 2008 November CTP (CTP5)</title><atom:summary>Fire up those virtual servers because the latest CTP is out!Get it here:http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=3BF4C5CA-B905-4EBC-8901-1D4C1D1DA884&amp;displaylang=enWhat's new:https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/content/content.aspx?ContentID=5470</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~3/hNHjCbNjMDE/sql-server-2008-ctp5.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (WesleyB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Dis4easSqlBlog/~4/hNHjCbNjMDE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://dis4ea.blogspot.com/2007/11/sql-server-2008-ctp5.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
