Don Mashak's MN 5th Judicial District Free Press

LEGALEVIL This is my letter responding to MN 10th Judicial District Assistant Chief Judge Hoffman's error laden, RICO Conspiracy abetting response to my letter demanding my Court Transcripts

2011-07-06T22:09:00.001-07:00

. ARE WE HAVING FUN YET? I allege the Minnesota Judiciary is pulling out all of the Stops to deny my allegations of Obstruction of Justice, RICO, etc. This series of letters allow the average Minnesota Citizen a Glimpse into the workings of the Corrupt and Criminal Minnesota Judiciary.

For the last six years the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees would not allow hundreds of Minnesota Citizens to present evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. The Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances is guaranteed by the 1st Amendment of the Federal Constitution, but apparently not in Minnesota.

At the same time, any time the Judges wanted a hearing on their bill to take aware our Constitutional Rights to vote for Minnesota Judges in meaningful, contested elections, the Minnesota Legislature betrayed WE THE PEOPLE and invited the Judges in for a Mutual Admiration Society Session.

The Minnesota Judiciary has unlawfully retaliated against me by using a case that I am a Plaintiff in to exact their revenge. They fixed this case against me by using Simulated Litigation and Fact Shaping...

But enough background, I think the series of letters is more entertaining and insightful.....

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Via Fax 651-430-6272

7/5/2011

John C. Hoffman – 651-430-4420

Assistant Chief Judge

Minnesota 10^th Judicial District

14949 62^nd St N

Stillwater, MN 55082-3802

Don Mashak

Rt 1 Box 231

Albertville, MN USA 55301

RE: your letter of 6/30/2011

Hello:

Due to the 4^th of July, 3 day weekend, I did not receive you letter until today. I called this morning only to find out the that Minnesota Judiciary is punishing Minnesota Citizens for not paying enough taxes by not answering phones on Tuesdays until the afternoon. And then in the afternoon the phone was busy.

I begin by asking 9 questions that I expect answered to so I can share them on the internet with my fellow citizens:

1) Is it a strategy of the Minnesota Judiciary to deliberately misstate facts in letters so they create a false record for future pleadings?;

2) Does the Minnesota Judiciary Subscribe to an absolute standard of morality or a relative moral standard of “Plausible Deniability”?;

3) Is it a standard ploy of the Judiciary to avoid phone calls from Pro Se litigants so they can lose by missing deadlines or not filing forms?

4) Are you going to tell me what alleged form I am missing regarding appeals or at least cite the Rule so I can find it.;

5) Is it true that you judges like to trip Pro Se Litigants up on the rules so they can’t win?

6) Is it true that once a year, usually at an expensive resort on Lake Mille Lacs, that the Minnesota Judiciary has a seminar essentially on “How to screw Pro Se litigants?”

7) After reading the undeniable true facts, please explain how you could get the facts in this matter so wrong;

8) Is the delay caused by the Court not returning my calls and in the Court Reporters not producing the transcripts, a strategy to allow the Appellate Court (or any other Court) to Rule against me for missing deadlines, overwhelming me so I make legal mistakes and/or to allow me to get tripped up on technicalities?

9) Is it your intention to aid and abet the criminal obstruction of justice (RICO) which is happening to me personally through unlawful, Simulated Litigation?

YoYour bogus facts are far off base. For months now, I have asked for the transcripts in question. Judge Yunker’s recorder and her legal aid would not return my calls. I made a motion to the lower Court for an IFP of the expenses for the transcripts. When that remained unanswered, I made a motion to the Appellate Court to compel the lower Court to Rule on the IFP and to provide me with the transcripts.

Past transcripts that I had paid these same 2 Court Recorders to provide took 10-14 days. I see no reason, except graft, corruption and cover-up, why these transcripts should take twice as long or more.

Further, you misstate that I was not told when I could expect the transcripts. Both Court Reporters told me 10 -14 days. I have the voice mail recording of one of them saying just that. So which one of them lied to you? Isn’t that the basis for immediate termination? Or do you reward court personnel who know when its time to lie?

Further, on June 9^th, 2011 the Court issued an order approving the IFP request for the transcripts. Are you still saying that despite said Court order I have to not complied with some Appellate Court Transcript Notice?

Are you telling me I cannot expect these transcripts anytime soon?

Are you telling, that despite the lower Court order, I will not be receiving these transcripts until I say the legal equivalent of “Simon Says” by submitting this Appellate Transcript Request form?

What punitive actions towards will you be taking against the Court and the Judicial Personnel who have obviously lied to you?

Please answer all the questions I have posed in writing, within 24 hours.

I want to be fair. I will post your response next to this letter on the letter on the internet, and let the rest of Minnesota Judge for them selves.

And I will treat your failure to answer any of my questions in this letter the way you Judges do. Your failure to respond will be interpreted to mean that your truthful answers to these questions would be detrimental to your position and reflect poorly the public’s perception of the Integrity of the Minnesota Judiciary. Is this clear to you?

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak

612-723-7780

Fax 612-605-1144

The Cynical Patriot

http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking the time to read and consider what I have posted and written.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

Response by MN 10th Judicial District Assistant Chief Judge Hoffman to my just previous letter demanding my Court Transcripts

2011-07-06T22:03:00.000-07:00

. This is a letter I received back form MN 10th Judicial District Assistant Chief Judge Hoffman. This is in response to the letter, just previous to this letter on this blog, demanding the transcripts that I say demonstrate Obstruction of Justice. I allege our Minnesota Judiciary is participating in a Coverup. When these transcripts are finally made available, they will demonstrate what I call fixing cases by "fact shaping" and others call "Simulated Litigation" Please read the letter that comes before and after this letter so you get a flavor of the criminal conspiracy and coverup our Minnesota Judiciary is participating in.

PUBLIC DEMAND FOR TRANSCRIPTS FROM 10TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE BLOOMQUIST

2011-07-06T21:22:00.000-07:00

THE SIMULATED LITIGATION AKA THE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE ENDS NOW

I AM NOT TAKING IT ANY LONGER

IF THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE, AND NO COVER UP GOING ON, I WILL HAVE THESE TRANSCRIPTS IN MY HANDS TODAY. OTHERWISE, LET THIS BE PROOF OF THE SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION OF THE ENTIRE MINNESOTA LEGAL AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM.

=======================================================================
STATE OF MINNESOTA TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COUNTY OF ISANTI CASE TYPE: CIVIL

Court File Number: 30-CV-09-429

Don Mashak and First National Repossessors, Inc.,

Plaintiffs,

DEMAND FOR TRANSCRIPTS

UNTIMELY TRANSCRIPTS –

CONTINUED COVER UP No 2

Dannette Meeks-Hull and Michael Hull,

Defendants.

TO Judge Bloomquist, 10^th Judicial District, Chief Judge via fax 320-679-6411

THIS IS A DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE POSSESSION OF THE 2 TRANSCRIPTS REFERENCED IN THE EARLIER COMMUNICATION TODAY.

Ms. Wilde told me 10 days to 2 weeks. That would have been on or before 6/23/2011. The previous transcripts I have requested from her in this same manner were produced in that similar time frame.

Ms. Wilde now has some excuse why she cannot produce the document in a timely fashion.

Based on that conversation, my perception of reality is that this is anther elaborate simulated litigation ruse… A furtherance of the original fraud and conspiracy. I have dealt with crooked courts enough to sense when some back door screwing is coming to me.

I need the transcripts for pleadings and responses, IMMEDIATELY.

No more excuses. No more Weasel suits. No More Lies

I WANT THE TRANSCRIPTS NOW… DON’T CARE WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE…

THEY ARE ALL JUST SOME PRETEXT TO UNJUSTLY SCREW ME BY THE RULES OR SOME OTHER LEGAL CHICANERY.

THIS SHOULD BE A CRIMINAL MATTER.

I WILL NOT BE SCREWED YET ANOTHER TIME BY THE COURTS, BECAUSE I WRONGFULLY TRUST ANYTHING ANY OF YOU SAY.

Thank you for your time and prompt response to this request.

6/28/2011

Don Mashak 612-723-7780

Rt 1 Box 231

Albertville MN 55301

DMashak@aol.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE OF MINNESOTA TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COUNTY OF ISANTI CASE TYPE: CIVIL

Court File Number: 30-CV-09-429

Don Mashak and First National Repossessors, Inc.,

Plaintiffs,

UNTIMELY TRANSCRIPTS –

CONTINUED COVER UP

Dannette Meeks-Hull and Michael Hull,

Defendants.

TO Judge Bloomquist, 10^th Judicial District, Chief Judge via fax 320-679-6411

On or about June 8, 2011, the Sherburne Court granted my IFP request for 2 transcripts, one or about 12/29/2010 and the other on or about 1/9/11, for use in the appeal and related litigation.

On that same day I contact the two involved Court Reporters Brenda Wilde and Jennifer Sati.

Both indicated it would be a couple of weeks before they would have the transcripts in about 2 weeks.

When I recently called to inquire where they were, I got voicemail for both and left messages.

Today I listened to an incoming voice mail from Brenda Wilde, time stamped 5:39pm yesterday, indicating she would not have the transcript she was responsible for until July 18, 2011. And indicating she would be out of the office until July 8, 2011.By my calculations, 2 weeks from on or about June 8, 2011 would be June 22, 2011, certainly not July 18, 2011.

This appears to be a deliberate delay. 40 days to get a transcript?

This is unacceptable. I have pleadings and responses to prepare under deadline.

I respectfully request that I have said transcripts by the end of this week and move the Court to so order.

Thank you for your time and prompt response to this request.

Don Mashak 612-723-7780

Rt 1 Box 231

Albertville MN 55301

DMashak@aol.com

TellMyPolitician

Posted by

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN TERRORISM AND BULL ROAR!

2011-06-29T22:26:00.000-07:00

Tweet

This is a teaser for an article I wrote on Examiner.com:

"WE THE PEOPLE of Minnesota have this to say about our State Government’s latest proposed Government shutdown hit list.

Hey you tyrannical #Minnesota #Politicians - If Drivers licenses, Fishing licenses, Hunting Licenses and Motor vehicle plates are not essential, by your own admissions, then lets take this opportunity to repeal all those laws requiring them.

How dare you follow Edward Bernays style Propaganda techniques http://bit.ly/hkXgr0 to terrorize #WETHEPEOPLE into agreeing to more taxes by morbidly instilling fear in all of us? http://bit.ly/kbdJgO

Who are you people? You cannot be my countrymen? Nor are you patriots; You are acting like selfish, ruthless, non-compassionate tyrannical Monsters.

WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND that you dirty, rotten tyrants of both major political parties and bureaucrat apparatchik accomplice henchmen stop playing politics on the backs and emotions of WE THE PEOPLE, your constituents.

WE THE PEOPLE are not your subjects! WE THE PEOPLE are the Sovereigns of our State and Country. You are supposed to be our Public Servants representing us, not Ruling Class Tyrants terrorizing us into subjugation.

Why are WE THE PEOPLE so enraged? How many cuts are you proposing that are counter-intuitive to common sense? How darn ignorant is it that you shut down "user fee" backed portions of the government?..."

Continue reading on Examiner.com MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN TERRORISM AND BULL ROAR! - Minneapolis Independent | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/independent-in-minneapolis/minnesota-government-shutdown-terrorism-and-bull-roar#ixzz1QQbDOeTg

Thank you for taking the time to read and reflect upon what i have written.

I write this article with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

Don Mashak's Page - Song of Truth Foundation

Don Mashak's Page - Patriot Action Network
DON MASHAK'S CHALLENGE TO ALL USA POLITICAL PARTIES!

Don Mashak's Page - Smart Girl Politics

don mashak // Current TV

Don Mashak on asamom As A Mom

Don Mashak - Examiner.com

The municipal debt bubble: as cities and states boost their debts by 800 percent, a housing-like crisis looms.(Columns): An article from: Reason

SEC's role in "municipal fiscal crises": Address

The banks and the municipal crisis: public responsibility and private profit. Special report to Honorable Stanley Steingut, Speaker, New York State Assembly

Propaganda * Edward Bernays

The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays and The Birth of Public Relation

Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Exposed DVD

---------------------------------

Strap on your thinking caps if you love Freedom - Locke vs Hobbes

2011-06-26T22:26:00.000-07:00

Tweet

This is a teaser to an article i wrote on Examiner.com"

"Proverbs 23:7a, "As a person thinketh in their heart, so are they." http://bit.ly/lOnOzU

On Twitter.com, there is an atmosphere of constructive intellectual exchange that challenges and causes each of us to think about why we believe what we believe. The internet represents a similar component of technological advance as Movable Type did to the First Enlightenment* (1650AD-1800AD). Twitter.com, Facebook.com and MySpace.com are analogous the coffeehouses and debating clubs of First Enlightenment. Through these electronic forums, Information and Ideas are being freely exchanged at a rate too fast for most governments to adapt to (for the purpose of maintaining their own power and the status quo)

One of my fellow Citizens and Patriots, responding to one of my “tweets” suggested that a split was occurring amongst WE THE PEOPLE in general and, in particular, those of us who take a greater interest in Liberty, Freedom and Politics.

My fellow citizen and cohort described this perceived split as "Libertarian" vs "Conservative". Before I say more, I thank my said cohort for bouncing their ideas off from me, so I would be inspired to reflect upon what causes me to believe what I believe in this regard. I hope that each of you are enlightened by our exchange of ideas...."

Continue reading on Examiner.com Strap on your thinking caps if you love Freedom - Locke vs Hobbes - Minneapolis Independent | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/independent-in-minneapolis/strap-on-your-thinking-caps-if-you-love-freedom-locke-vs-hobbes#ixzz1QQHPGWNR

Thank you for taking the time to read and reflect upon what i have written.

I write this article with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

Don Mashak's Page - Song of Truth Foundation

DON MASHAK'S CHALLENGE TO ALL USA POLITICAL PARTIES!

Don Mashak's Page - Smart Girl Politics

don mashak // Current TV

Don Mashak on asamom As A Mom

Don Mashak - Examiner.com
Leviathan - Hobbes (Oxford World's Classics)

The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls

Two Treatises of Government - John Locke

Critique of Practical Reason - Kant
----------------------------------------------------------------

Tooth Fairy, Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, TV Pro-Wresting, Reality TV and the US 2 Major Party Political System Part 1 of 2

2011-06-20T18:34:00.000-07:00

Tweet

STOP ALLOWING YOURSELF TO BE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF

BY THE 2 MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES

OPEN YOUR MIND AND PREPARE YOURSELF FOR A NEW, TRUER

PERCEPTION OF REALITY

CHILDHOOD MYTHS AND FANTASIES

"We have a tradition in America of imparting to our children seemingly harmless, fanciful perceptions of reality. The Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus are all fanciful myths aka manufactured false perceptions of reality. Almost all of us Americans fervently believed at least one of these fantasies in our early lives.

Our Parents and teachers and other people in our lives imparted to us a belief in these myths as being true.

And, we believe these stories basically for 4 different reasons:

At that age, we are less sophisticated and less able to discern truth from fiction.
And, regardless of our age, more likely believe something we are told when it told to us by people we trust and/or love.
Circumstantial evidence – Money replacing the teeth. Easter Baskets on Easter Morning. Easter egg hunts at Church. The cookies and milk we set out for Santa were gone the next morning. Jingle bells outside of the house at the appropriate time. Children’s Books dedicated to the subject. TV ads and programs espousing the existence of said Santa Claus, etc.
The fictional perception of reality is more desirable than the alternative. In short, we want to believe because we benefit or perceive benefit from going along with the myth. e.g. money, candy, gifts. And these myths also give us a nebulous, warm fuzzy feeling and sense of security. They made the world seem less harsh and friendlier.

If we are honest with ourselves, we will acknowledge that our youthful “perception of reality” incorporated unquestioning and absolute belief in the Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny and/or Santa Claus. Regardless of how easily we can disprove that reality now, and how ridiculous our belief in them seems on retrospection, we believed in these myths at one point in our lives. We accepted these myths as the truth and they were our Reality. Through these myths, almost all Americans share the experience of believing in a perception of reality that was never real, despite our once fervent belief that they were.

And we did not easily give up our beliefs in these myths. Even when harsh reality was brought to our attention some of desperately clung to the fantasy... I can remember some kids in the school yard fighting their peers who were the bearer of bad news. Others were more restrained in their responses, waiting to go home and check with a trusted and reliable source, their parents. I did not want to believe that my parents would believe me. And for those that clung to the myth, there was the peer pressure of being ridiculed and being called immature.

But once the individual overcame their desire for their false perception of reality to be true, they very quickly came to realize the discrepancies in the myth. For example, the impossibility of one single person such as Santa Claus delivering gifts to every household in one night… Or the impossibility of reindeer and a sleigh defying the law of gravity. They all seem so obvious in retrospect.

However, other myths and mysteries of life don’t offer the same absolute proof and closure as the false perceptions of reality involving Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus. And these myths, fantasies, deceptions, delusions and duplicities are far more injurious than our childhood fantasies.

PERCEPTION IS REALITY

Essentially, each person’s perception of reality comes only from their daily interactions and cumulative inputs to their senses of sight, sound, smell, taste and touch. http://bit.ly/8c3u and http://bit.ly/aUAj3s
With that in mind, I ask you each to go back to that period of your life when you fervently believed in the Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus...."

To Read the rest of the story for free continue reading on Examiner.com Tooth Fairy, Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, Pro-Wresting & the US 2 Party System 1/2 - Minneapolis Independent | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/independent-in-minneapolis/tooth-fairy-easter-bunny-santa-claus-pro-wresting-the-us-2-party-system-1-2#ixzz1Pj1Wm6b1

I write this article with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Thank you for Taking the Time to Read this.

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

Don Mashak's Page - Patriot Action Network
Don Mashak on Song of Truth Foundation
DON MASHAK'S PAGE on American Voice
Don Mashak's Page - Smart Girl Politics
Don Mashak (dmashak) - Digg
Don Mashak's Minnesota 10th Judicial District Free Press
Don Mashak - Discover Don Mashak pages on StumbleUpon
don mashak // Current TV
Google Buzz / Don Mashak on Google Buzz / Don Mashak | BoardReader
Don Mashak's Page - 12160
Don Mashak on ASAMOM
Don Mashak on Well Regulated American Militias

<p>&amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=dmashak&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;o=1&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;p=8&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;l=bpl&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;asins=0449205622&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;fc1=000000&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;IS2=1&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt1=_blank&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;m=amazon&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;bc1=000000&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;f=ifr" style="align:left;padding-top:5px;width:131px;height:245px;padding-right:10px;"align="left" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;gt;</p>

Legal Evil? In their own words - Part 1 of 3

2011-05-10T17:37:00.000-07:00

This is a teaser from an article I wrote on Examiner.com:

From Public School, to church, to the movies and the major media and elections themselves, the American public is induced to believe that the Judges of America are men of integrity beyond reproach.

So with all of those credentials and long years of propaganda and censorship one faces a mighty steep mountain of indoctrination, propaganda and goodwill in exposing the true nature of Minnesota and the Country's Judiciary.

With the Judiciary's reputation reputation for integrity and honesty firmly embedded in the minds of WE THE PEOPLE, what standing do I have to challenge their reputations. In my estimate, what ever I might say would be easily dismissed, for what is my word to the word of these prestigious Judges.

To overcome this handicap, I will use the American Legal Systems own words to expose the true nature of their character.

Let us begin with the words of former FBI director J Edgar Hoover:

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.''

Whatever could the former director of the FBI, with all of the domestic intelligence information at his disposal, have meant by such a statement? I leave it to the reader to reach their own conclusion.

Next, I am going to use the words of Judges themselves. Judges have a strange little way of reaching conclusions allegedly using case law and jurisprudence. This effectively means they theoretically use the findings of previous judges to base their decision on the current case. Most of these rulings are reduced to short citations of a single sentence or a paragraph along with the case caption and where it is publicized (When judges do bad things and don't follow the law, they just don't publish their rulings - You see the secret is, Judges just censor from the general public most of the bad, unjust things they do.)

I recently had cause to research various rulings on immunity for Judges and State Governments. And I was astonished and devastated to learn the liberties they had taken and leaps of logic they had used to write the rules in their favor.

Using their own words, the first case I will cite is Wiggins v Hess (1976, CA8 Mo) 531 F2d 920 and Harley v Oliver (1976, CA9 Ark) 539 F2d 1143

"Judicial immunity applies even when judge acts maliciously and corruptly; judge loses his immunity from liability for damages in violation of 42 USCS &1983 ONLY if he acts in clear absence of jurisdiction."...

To read the rest of this article for free, please click here->;
Examiner. com Legal Evil? In their own words - Part 1 of 3

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

Government Corruption - Who watches the Watchmen?

2011-04-27T10:55:00.000-07:00

.
Government Corruption Video - So what have you learned as a legal intern?
.

This video offers rare insight into the Systemic Corruption the pervades the American Legal System.

Rather than force your children to learn this life lesson the hard way, perhaps it would be worthwhile for you to have this discussion with them. The perception of reality taught in Public Schools and the major media does not reflect reality and makes your children vulnerable to the Duplicity of our Government. May I humbly suggest that upon graduation or matriculation from High School or college, you watch this video with them and discuss your perception of reality with them.

You can find more such videos on Government and Judicial Corruption on YouTube.

You can find more information on Government and Judicial Corruption at Lawless America.

If you are interested in becoming involved in a non-partisan organization aimed at restoring Transparency and Accountability to our Government, join us here on most Sundays from 4p-6p CT you can watch Government Reform and Integrity Platform TV.

Lastly, if you still are not moved to action, I remind you that the rise of tyranny generally proceeds incrementally. More than a decade before he begain WWII, Hitler was jailed and had no power to stop it.
Had the German people realized what was evolving, do you think they would have made sure he did not rise to power? Hitler did not tell people his true intent. Through Progressive Edward Bernays style Propaganda and Censorship he treated treated the German people as a herd by appealing to their feelings, fears and desires. And through various methods, Hitler consolidated his power and eventually, an almost invincible strangle-hold on the German empire.

Tyrants do not generally reveal their true nature until they have consolidated their power.

The point being, the time in now to act is before the rising tyranny in America has the time and opportunity to consolidate its power and establish its own seemingly invincible strangle-hold on WE THE PEOPLE.

In closing, I write this article with the same intentions of Thomas Paine. I seek no leadership role, I seek only to help the American people find their own way using their own "Common Sense".

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you for your time.

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

Quora
Smart Girl Politics

TellMyPolitician

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names
.

Minnesota Judicial Code Red - You Can't Handle the Truth!

2011-03-26T16:23:00.000-07:00

This is a teaser excerpt from an article I wrote on Examiner.com:

"From the move, "A Few Good Men" we learned of an alleged military tradition. According to the legend, when a military officer wants someone to do something counter to the standing rules, they create a verbal code name for it and it is never committed to paper and it is only spoken discreetly about in trusted company.

In this film, a "Code Red" was an order to administer sever physical punishment upon another soldier in violation of the rules. The intention being to get a lackadaisical or incompetent soldier to shape up and in this particular case to get them the subject soldier to quit whining and complaining over the heads of his superiors.

In "A Few Good Men", the Code Red goes wrong because the target of the Code Red dies of an undisclosed underlying pre-existing medial condition... And the cover up, is on until....

Colonel Nathan Jessep roars "You can't handle the truth" [video clip]

As you watch the video clip, please take note of the arrogant attitude Colonel Jessup has in ruthlessly rationalizing and justifying his actions and perspective of reality. If you get a chance to watch the movie, pay heed to duplicity, machinations and subversive methods the film portrays. [movie] Note how those opposed to the conspiracy are offered Quid Pro Quo consideration, threatened, sacrificed, demonized and/or discredited. Your Corrupt Minnesota Judiciary displays the same sanctimonious attitude and utilizes the same heavy handed tactics when law abiding citizens confront them about their corruption and abuse of power.

That having been said, "Can YOU Handle the Truth?"

For a couple of years now, I have espoused the existence of a Minnesota Judicial Code Red.

Have you ever wondered why all those Incumbent Judges in Minnesota almost never have an opponent?..."

To read the rest of the article for free Click here -> Examiner.com

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak

The Cynical Patriot

http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

First Principles, People Are Equal Under Natural Law

2011-03-19T23:41:00.000-07:00

The following Elements of Natural Law are fundamental to the Citizens of the USA understanding the problems our Country (the USA) faces. And it may also be helpful in allowing the rank and file Citizens of other Countries in understanding the problems in theirs.

The fundamental understanding our US Founding Fathers had in drafting our constitution, is People under Natural Law have free will, and are not virtuous by nature. Therefore, governments must be constructed in anticipation of the nature of man. Acting on this knowledge, our Founding Fathers built into our Government and Constitution, various checks and balances.

Amongst these checks and balances were transparency and accountability. All of our problems today emanate from the slow, persistent rolling back of the checks and balances, transparency and accountability our Founding Fathers built into our Government and Constitution. An explanation of the who, how, what and why can be found in the attached email that I fortuitously recently received.

The attached email and its included links, are another example of someone else saying something better than I could myself... I encourage the reader to follow the links to that email author's website for a fuller understanding of the underlying principles and out of respect for the author. It is important that we give credit where credit is due. Such free thinkers are likely undercompensated for giving us insight into the roots of the actual problem confronting our society and intuitive resolution there from.

THE FOLLOWING REPRINTED WITH EXPRESSED PERMISSION OF THE AUTHOR.

From: Martin
To: martin@whatwouldthefoundersthink.com
Sent: Thu, Mar 17, 2011 7:57 am
Subject: First Principles, Men Are Equal Under God

What Would The Founders Think? has posted a new item, 'First Principles, Men Are
Equal Under God'

Cato letter Nos. 59-60 argue that man’s freedom is given by God, and that all
men are equal in His sight. Men, having been given free will, are not virtuous by nature and, acknowledging their imperfections, create governments so that they may live in safety and harmony together.

In the American Republic, the Founders said, that being the case, all men must
likewise be equal under the laws government creates. However, governments, being
creations of men, are also imperfect. Cato prescribes a way to keep government
from exceeding its mandate and trampling on the liberties of the governed.

You may view the latest post at
http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/first-principles-men-are-equal-under-god

Best regards,
Martin
http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com

P.S. Did you like this article? Help spread the word about
whatwouldthefoundingfathersthink.com; Stumble it, Reddit, and/or mail it to a
friend. Thanks for your help!

P.P.S. If you want to help support WWTFT you can do so at no cost to you! The
next time you want to make a purchase at Amazon, click on the Amazon link in
sidebar FIRST. Then navigate to whatever item you want to buy on Amazon. By
doing so, Amazon will track us as the referrer for the sale and send a few cents
our way. :-)

-----------

TellMyPolitician

Posted by:

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

Chaos Theory, Rank & File Wisconsin Public Employees & True Grassroots TEA Party

2011-03-15T09:27:00.000-07:00

The following is an except from an article I wrote on Examiner.com:

"From now until the 2012 elections, I am going to write a series of articles with the express purpose of trying to get the average reader to "think outside of the box" At the same time, I hope I am up to the task of keeping the subject matter entertaining. Before the next election occurs, it is my hope to get WE THE PEOPLE aka the Common person aka the General Public to experience a paradigm shift in their thinking with regard to politics and voting.

Ultimately, I want to change your perception of reality to one that reflects your own true thought processes. This as opposed to the your current perception of reality induced by the propaganda, censorship and duplicity of America's Major Media, Entertainment Industry, Big Business and our own alleged political leaders. All this with the goal of having you vote your own mind, rather than vote in the manner your Government and major media have manipulated you to.

That having been said....

I was first introduced to Chaos theory in college. It was one of those hazy late night philosophical discussions we often had in college.

FREE WILL vs CHAOS THEORY

In America, during our youthful years of public education we are indoctrinated with a belief that everything we choose to do is a matter of free will. If I choose to turn left, kick a can, drink water, blow off class, cast a vote or any act you can think of, we are taught to believe we had the ability aka free will, to choose to do something else. Turn Right, not drink, not skip class, not vote. We are taught that every action we take is fully within our personal control and we make our choices of our own free will.

Chaos Theory (Determinism) states that no matter what we do, we have no choice... we have no free will. According to Chaos Theory, so many external factors have acted upon you that you have no choice but to do what ever action you have done. Your choice has been predetermined by a multitude of previously occurring, external influences.

Being much younger then, of course I knew it all and immediately dismissed this proposed Chaos Theory as psycho-babble. Yet, almost half a life time later, I am willing to consider chaos theory as a viable explanation of certain political events and attitudes.

WISCONSIN PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

My personality is that of an analytical driver. I gather facts and make decisions. It has been my life’s presumption that the vast majority of people also act out of reason and logic.
It escapes me by what logic Rank and File Wisconsin Public Employees do not recognize..."

Continue reading for free on Examiner.com: Chaos Theory,Rank & File Wisconsin Public Employees & True Grassroots TEA Party - Minneapolis Independent | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/independent-in-minneapolis/chaos-theory-wisconsin-public-employees-and-justice-minnesota#ixzz1GJLiEqpL

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

This is how the Minnesota Judiciary System Fixes Court Cases

2011-02-24T03:08:00.000-08:00

It is the strategy of many governments to demonize and discredit political dissent.

Should you doubt this I encourage you to read about the FBI, COINTELPRO and Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. here

For 24 years I have of attempted to bring reform and transparency to the Minnesota Judicial System.

Our Minnesota State Government and Court System consider this an act of Political dissent.

I am the target and victim of an operation to demonize and discredit me because cause of my exercise
of my Constitutionally protected 1st Amendment Right to Petition our Government for Redress of Grievances.

To demonstrate one method our Government has used to demonize and discredit me, I provide to you this transcript of my Motion to Remove Judge Mary Yunker for Bias.

I am one of the Plaintiffs in this matter. I have been denied full, fair, equitable, unbiased and just adjudication of the matter at hand. After almost 2 years of litigation and the expense of more than $16000 dollars, I have been denied all depositions and the ability to amend my complaint to reflect additional claims. Only on the last day of discovery, did I receive the most insignificant answers to some discovery. I fear this litigation will end in another exercise of "Might Make Right" and "How much justice can you afford?"

The long and the short of this is that 2 former employees quit my employment while I was out of the country on vacation. They stole company property with the intent of starting their own repossession company. They embezzled money, destroyed records and made up stoies in an attempt to steal my clients. 3 times after they said they had no company property in their possession, they returned company property, the last time to an attorney.

Upon being caught, the defendants made various wild allegations of a sexual nature against me. I am told that such allegations are pretty common as a means to try to assert a defense and muddy the water.

This litigation should have been a straight forward, done and over matter.

I took and passed a polygraph. I demanded the opportunity to deposition my accusers.
I wanted to amend my complaint to include claims for the false allegations, but was not allowed to.

But the Courts have decided to use this allegation to demonize and discredit me to thwart my efforts at judicial reform and to punish me for daring to believe in the Right Provided to me in the Constitution.

Unfortunately, the adjudication of Justice is boring. Points i think demonstrate the Courts Bias and Inconsistency may be too nuanced for you to understand. All I can do is simply demonstrate the Courts inconsistencies and failure to follow its own rules. I can only hope that the reader comes to realize the court has not operated fairly and justly. And then hope that you can deduce from this that I am the victim of our governments deliberate attempts to demonize and discredit me. Perhaps if you consider the following point

     1) Why would I be denied the opportunity deposition the Defendants if they would repeat the allegations under oath?
     2) Why would I not be allowed to subpoena the identies of persons that posted duragatory information on the internet, if the allegation were true and would serve to corroborate the allegation?
   3) Why would 4 different attorneys that I hired refuse to Notice the Defendants for Depositions?
     4) Why would the last attorney wait until 10 days after the Discovery period to try to amend the complaint to add the additional causes of action I requested from the beginning;
   5) A September 16, 2010 hearing was canceled. I say it was to prevent reconciling discovery issues and amending the complaint. The Judge says my attorney canceled it without my permission. My attorney says the Judge canceled the hearing. If nothing untoward happened why are my former attorney and the Judge passing the buck?
   6) Why did Judge Yunker invent the term "Suspensed Motions" which is not a term that i have found any attorney to be familiar with nor does it occur in MN Rules of Civil Procedure nor the MN Rules of General Procedure in an attempt to keep evidence off the Record?
     7) Is it fair and equitable that Judge Yunker refused to set any hearing in person or by teleconference to resolve discovery issues and/or amend the Complaint for the last two and a half months of discovery?

I encourage you to read the attached transcript so that you may know all the injustices i have suffered at the hands of the Minnesota Judiciary.

I allege the following:

Because the Minnesota Judiciary controls the discipline and licenses of Minnesota Attorneys, Minnesota Attorneys are more loyal to the Judges they appear before than they are to you their client (Why do you think they call Public Defenders, Public Pretenders?)

Judges in Minnesota are allowed to take tips which common persons like you and I would call bribes. In many case, the outcome of your case is decided by the Judge, before the first time you are in Court. The Judge "telegraphs" to the attorneys what outcome they want and the attorneys use the equivalent of smoke and mirrors to allow the judge to reach the conclusion the judge wants.

The method of fixing cases is generally achieved by attorneys by either controlling what evidence gets on the record or my making "legal" mistakes which allow the judge to rule against you. Because most of us trust the attorney that we pay lots of money to and because most of us are unaware of the law, we don't even realize our case is being fixed.

I have been fighting to understand how the corruption takes place for 24 years. For the last 4 years, I have been fighting to put forth reforms to bring transparency and accountability to the Minnesota Judiciary.

In reading the attached transcript, I hope to expose the nature of much of the corruption that exists in the Minnesota Judiciary. At the same time, hope that I enlighten each of you as to the as to the absolute
necessity of Judicial Reform in Minnesota.

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE

I have paid the price for speaking out against Judicial Corruption in Minnesota.

The Minnesota Judiciary have chose to use the false accusations of my former employees to destroy me to maintain their own power. At every opportunity I could expose the fraudulent nature of my former employees accusations, I have been thwarted.
.
My business is in ruins. My house is in foreclosure. My health is devastated. After spending $16000 on attorneys I cannot afford to be represented at the trial. A trial at which my maximum award by the jury can be $101.00.

This is representative of the evil nature of Minnesota's Judiciary.
The Powers that be in the Minnesota Judiciary laugh smugly behind closed doors at the destruction that they have brought to my life.

I have no criminal record save a speeding ticket and my life has been laid waste for daring to speak of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. If they can do this to me, they can do this to any of you.

The failure of your elected officials and the Minnesota Judiciary to act swiftly to address and correct the injustice I have suffered should be the final bit of evidence you need to render your judgment of the Minnesota Judiciary. I assert that your elected officials endorse and support the Judicial Corruption in Minnesota and recognize the problem of corruption in Minnesota Government is systemic.

I urge you to contact your elected officials and demand reform of the Minnesota Judiciary before
you or someone you care about finds themselves in front of the evil, corrupt and unaccountable Minnesota Judiciary.

And should your elected official whine that they don't have time for anything but the budget deficit, perhaps you should take the time to join Justice in Minnesota.

I have educated you as to the nature of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. The price for doing so has been exacted upon me by the powers that be.

I humbly and respectfully ask that you not let all the life dreams that i have sacrificed to bring you this enlightenment, not go for naught.

DEMAND JUDICIAL REFORM IN MINNESOTA.
DO NOT LET THEM TAKE YOUR RIGHT TO VOTED FOR JUDGES IN MEANINGFUL, CONTESTED ELECTIONS AWAY FROM YOU.

I leave you with this quote before you read the transcript and oral argument exhibits....

"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.

Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.—Dietrich Bonhoeffer "

Those were my thoughts

Thank you for your time.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak

The Cynical Patriot

[If I have time, I will post the actual written Motion to Remove Judge Yunker for Bias and the releated exhibits]

TellMyPolitician

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

Page 1

1 STATE OF MINNESOTA                                                                             DISTRICT COURT

2 COUNTY OF ISANTI TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

3

4 -----------------------------------------------------------

5 Don Mashak, 1st National                                          ) COURT HEARING
Repossessors, Inc.,                                                        )
6                                                                     Plaintiffs, ) Court File No. 30-CV-09-248
                                                                                      )
7 vs.                                                                               )
                                                                                      )
8 Dannette L. Meeks-Hull,                                             ) February 4, 2011
Michael Hull,                                                                  ) 3:00 p.m.
9                                                                                    )
                                                                   Defendants. )
10 -----------------------------------------------------------

11

12

13

14 The above-entitled matter came on for hearing

15 before the Honorable Mary A. Yunker, District Court

16 Judge, at the Sherburne County Government Center, City

17 of Elk River, Minnesota.

18

19

20 APPEARANCES:

21 DON MASHAK, the Plaintiff, appeared pro se.

22

23

24 COURT REPORTER: Jennifer S. Sati, RMR, CRR, CBC, CRI
(763) 241-2831

25

Page 2

1 (WHEREUPON, the following proceedings were duly

2 had:)

3

4 THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. Mashak. You

5 may certainly step to counsel table.

6 MR. MASHAK: Could I have the bailiff give you

7 this? You had asked for it.

8 THE COURT: Certainly. Please feel free to be

9 seated, Mr. Mashak. Mr. Mashak, are you prepared to

10 proceed?

11 MR. MASHAK: In just one moment, Your Honor.

12 Okay.

13 THE COURT: We will call Don Mashak and First

14 National Repossessors, Incorporated, Plaintiffs, versus

15 Dannette Meeks-Hull and Michael Hull, Defendants. This

16 is a motion hearing brought pursuant to Plaintiff's

17 motion to remove this Court from these proceedings for

18 bias.

19 Present in the courtroom today is Mr. Mashak.

20 The other parties have not appeared and are not required

21 to appear at this hearing but were given notice of

22 today's scheduling.

23 Mr. Mashak, you will note on counsel table to

24 your right a laptop computer. It is realtime reporting,

25 and it is displaying in written fashion in realtime the

Page 3

1 proceedings that are being conducted here today. It is

2 placed on counsel table for your use. And the Court

3 reporter will be happy to instruct you regarding its

4 use.

5 You may review the written transcript during

6 the course of breaks, which the Court intends to take

7 during these proceedings, so that you may be assisted in

8 processing this information as time goes on.

9 What I'm going to do at this point is stop

10 these proceedings so that the court reporter can step

11 down and can instruct you into the use of the laptop so

12 that you can access these written proceedings, if you

13 choose to do so during the course of the proceedings.

14 (Discussion held between Mr. Mashak and the court

15 reporter off the record.)

16 THE COURT: Mr. Mashak, if you need additional

17 assistance with the operation of the laptop, please let

18 us know that and we will accommodate you during the

19 course of the breaks.

20 Mr. Mashak, are you represented by counsel in

21 these proceedings?

22 MR. MASHAK: No, I'm not.

23 THE COURT: Do you intend to proceed

24 representing yourself in these matters?

25 MR. MASHAK: I guess I have no choice.

Page 4

1 THE COURT: Additionally, as I have previously

2 indicated, these proceedings are not to be recorded,

3 either audio or visual, in contravention of the rules of

4 the Court.

5 So I am informing those who are in attendance

6 here, Mr. Mashak -- and there is one person in the

7 audience, who I think has been at previous hearings --

8 that video or audio recordings are expressly prohibited

9 by the rules of Court and there will potentially be

10 sanctions if you violate these rules of Court by

11 recording these proceedings.

12 MR. MASHAK: May I address that point?

13 THE COURT: Yes, sir, you may.

14 MR. MASHAK: I'd like to understand, because

15 it's my understanding that pursuant to Minnesota

16 Statutes, tape recording of conversations is lawful as

17 long as one party to those conversations are present,

18 and I'd like to know how Court rules over --

19 understanding the hierarchy of laws, how court rule can

20 over -- supersede a Minnesota statute?

21 THE COURT: Mr. Mashak, I'm not able to give

22 you a legal opinion that would answer your legal

23 question with regard to the application of other

24 Minnesota statutes, which do talk about tape recording.

25 (Phone ring tones in courtroom.)

Page 5

1 THE COURT: I'm assuming, Mr. Mashak, you just

2 turned your cell phone off?

3 MR. MASHAK: Yes.

4 THE COURT: Appreciate that. Thank you, sir.

5 I am not able to give you legal advice with regard to

6 interpretation of Minnesota statute which does control

7 the tape recording of conversation between two private

8 parties. However, I have informed you in the past and I

9 will re-inform you today that court rules prohibit

10 recording in the court, absent express authority by the

11 court which can be given under limited circumstances,

12 and which has not been given in these proceedings.

13 So I reiterate: Recording is prohibited and

14 there are potential sanctions for those who violate this

15 court order and this court rule. With regard to these

16 proceedings today, the realtime reporting and frequent

17 recesses will be granted in order to accommodate the

18 request under the Americans With Disabilities Act

19 request that you have made, Mr. Mashak.

20 And I note that prior to today's hearing you

21 did give me some additional information. We will

22 discuss that at the conclusion of these hearings in

23 private, if you choose to do that. The Court may have

24 some additional questions on that issue.

25 MR. MASHAK: Okay.

Page 6

1 THE COURT: Now, with regard to the motion

2 which is pending today, Minnesota Rule of General

3 Procedure 106 requires that this Court conduct a hearing

4 on your motion and that is why we are here today. This

5 is like any other civil motion. The Court can and will

6 consider the affidavit that you filed in support of your

7 motion, which was received by the Court January 20,

8 2011, and was submitted to the Court under oath.

9 It is your affidavit which has the information

10 that you wanted the Court to review with regard to this

11 motion. Your opportunity today is to argue your motion

12 or to submit other written information, if you wish to,

13 for the Court to consider this matter.

14 Mr. Mashak, the rules require that it is your

15 responsibility to demonstrate an affirmative showing of

16 prejudice on behalf of this Court in order to receive

17 the relief that you are requesting. And that is defined

18 in the rules as such bias as a juror might have excluded

19 from consideration of the action should the juror have

20 the same opinions. You may proceed, sir.

21 MR. MASHAK: Okay. Well, first, I'm going to

22 say that a lot of this stems from the unconstitutional

23 transference by the Minnesota Legislature to the Supreme

24 Court of oversight of the Minnesota Judiciary. And

25 further, in having the Minnesota Lawyers Board overseen

Page 7

1 by the Supreme Court effectively makes lawyers be more

2 loyal or answerable to judges than they do the clients

3 that pay them.

4 In this case, which should have been a simple

5 case, this was a nothing case that has been turned

6 upside down and my life has been turned upside down

7 because of my exercise of my First Amendment

8 Constitutional right to petition the government for

9 redress of grievances.

10 For the past five years, a group of hundreds

11 of us have been trying to submit evidence and testimony

12 of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary before the

13 House and Senate Judiciary Committees and we've been

14 unconstitutionally and unlawfully denied that right.

15 And I feel that the way that this matter has

16 been handled is a retaliation, an unlawful retaliation,

17 for my exercise of my right to petition the courts and

18 that had the Minnesota House and Minnesota Senate

19 Judiciary Committees heard the testimony and evidence

20 that I wouldn't even be in the position to having to

21 bring this motion.

22 Simply, the Board of Judicial Standards is a

23 farce. It's a black hole. I've received numerous, and

24 other people have shown me, where they can only deal

25 with things like judge or attorney doesn't show up on

Page 8

1 time, doesn't file papers timely, if they steal from an

2 escrow fund or something like that, that's about the

3 closest to criminal they can get. But everything else

4 is subject to appeal. And most citizens of this country

5 simply are not capable of paying all the expenses, nor

6 understanding all the intricacies of filing the appeal.

7 So the courts have used this to punish those that

8 dissent from the majority.

9 In this particular matter, I've had four

10 attorneys. The first attorney, Diana Longrie, failed to

11 show up for court, failed to give me the documents I

12 needed when she didn't show up, refused to submit

13 discovery, refused to notice depositions. And we had

14 agreed on 50 admissions and related interrogatories and

15 document production requests and she never sent them.

16 She received a Rule 11 motion from the defense back a

17 year ago November. Never notified me. Never notified

18 the second attorney that I hired.

19 The second attorney, Joe O'Brien -- and,

20 again, there's no complaint from Longrie that she didn't

21 get paid. The second attorney, Joe O'Brien, worked on

22 my case for a couple months, got paid money, and, in

23 fact, then he stopped returning my calls. I went with

24 another attorney to pin him down, and he admitted that

25 he had just been a little bit lax and he'd get right on

Page 9

1 it. Then we couldn't find him. So for three months I

2 couldn't get him to return my file to me.

3 Two months after I notified the Lawyers

4 Professional Responsibility Board that he hadn't

5 returned my files so I couldn't proceed with my case, he

6 left me a text message that he had left the file on the

7 seat of an open car on my property.

8 I fail to understand how the Supreme Court nor

9 anybody could foresee that they should have some teeth

10 in the law that requires an attorney to return the file

11 upon demand. You guys have this implied consent for us

12 drivers in regards to taking DUI tests, but there's

13 nothing for an attorney that says: Hey, this is the

14 litmus test. Either you produce files within, I don't

15 know, five, ten days, whatever you think is reasonable,

16 or we jerk your license. I don't understand why that

17 doesn't exist.

18 He missed deadlines, made me scramble to do

19 things pro se. And I got it back on 6-15, and I had a

20 hearing on July 9. I showed up on July 9 ready to go

21 with another attorney and the defense didn't even bother

22 to show up. We requested summary judgment; weren't

23 granted it.

24 And then there was supposed to be a new

25 scheduling order entered. And for two months I bugged

Page 10

1 the attorney about when are they going to answer the

2 discovery that I had to serve? Because at the time I

3 didn't have any and the deadline was coming up and I

4 didn't know what was going to happen on July 9. I

5 served admissions and I served requests -- or

6 interrogatories, et cetera, et cetera.

7 And in any case, we never got an answer. All

8 my attorney kept saying to me is the other side said

9 they weren't at the July 9 hearing so they don't have to

10 answer because as far as they're concerned the deadline

11 to respond to your discovery passed after the deadline

12 for discovery to be done.

13 And so I kept telling the attorney, you need

14 to be sending -- having the court get that scheduling

15 order so they can't keep telling you this. This went on

16 for months. I kept saying: Can't they just call the

17 court themselves? Can't you set a hearing? Can't you

18 compel discovery? And he said no.

19 I'd like to enter this e-mail between my

20 attorney and myself on August 17, and I'll give this to

21 you in just a moment. I'll give it to you right now

22 because I have another copy of it.

23 THE COURT: Mr. Mashak, I'm assuming it's not

24 in the form of a sworn affidavit?

25 MR. MASHAK: No.

Page 11

1 THE COURT: Are you willing to swear under

2 oath today that it's a true and accurate copy --

3 MR. MASHAK: Certainly.

4 THE COURT: -- of the document that you're in

5 possession of?

6 MR. MASHAK: Yes, Your Honor.

7 THE COURT: I'm going to ask you to stand,

8 raise your right hand and be sworn.

9 (Mr. Mashak was sworn in by the Clerk of Court.)

10 THE COURT: Be seated again. I'm going to ask

11 the deputy to hand the document back to you, and I'm

12 going to ask you to identify for the record what it is

13 and indicate whether it's a true and accurate copy of

14 the document in your possession.

15 MR. MASHAK: This is an e-mail from -- between

16 myself, Jack Gram, and Mark Olson, dated August 17. And

17 it describes the problem they were having with the

18 court.

19 THE COURT: Authored by whom, sir?

20 MR. MASHAK: It was -- it was sent to me and

21 it was between me and Mark Olson, my attorney at the

22 time.

23 THE COURT: Authored by Mr. Olson?

24 MR. MASHAK: Yes.

25 THE COURT: And you're swearing on the record

Page 12

1 today it's a true and accurate copy of what you have in

2 your document possession?

3 MR. MASHAK: Absolutely.

4 THE COURT: You may hand it to the deputy.

5 I'll receive it as information for this hearing.

6 MR. MASHAK: And here's the essence of this:

7 Here's the problem, Jack, my office has called the Court

8 four times. I've sent two letters. She is chambered in

9 Sherburne County and the case is in Isanti. I asked her

10 if I should copy her with submissions to her chambers

11 and she said no. She explained that without a file it

12 would be in no man's land. I also explained to her that

13 I could e-mail her the documents. She again said no.

14 Just send them forward. I don't want to become a pest.

15 I have a paper trail here. I'm sure that Don is anxious

16 since his prior counsel dropped the ball," et cetera, et

17 cetera.

18 And this went on for weeks where he was -- I

19 was on his case saying this needs to come to an end

20 because at that point in time this had been going on for

21 more than a year. And he was indicating that he was

22 having problems contacting the Court. And that the

23 Court wasn't responding to sending him a scheduling

24 order. And along the line, I finally said I'm going to

25 get a copy of the transcript from July 9 and you can

Page 13

1 send that to them. And then all of the sudden when

2 everybody was aware that I did that, there was a flurry

3 of activity. And my recollection is that the scheduling

4 order was produced by you on or about August 28th but

5 somehow got lost.

6 And in that same time frame, I got served a

7 motion for -- Rule 11 Motion for Summary Judgment that

8 was to be heard on September 30th. In the meantime at

9 the July 9th hearing we had specifically said the

10 original court date was supposed to be September 16th.

11 And we just left it as September 16th because we figured

12 there would be discovery issues that would be dealt with

13 at that point in time.

14 So when we can't compel discovery, we can't

15 get the other side to answer discovery, we're not

16 getting responses from the court, I am reasonably

17 annoyed and irritated that this is not proceeding the

18 way it should proceed. I'm being denied the opportunity

19 to collect evidence. I'm being denied the opportunity

20 to get evidence on the record.

21 And then I started having debates with my

22 attorney about whether we should put evidence on the

23 record. Because he's trying to tell me: Well, they

24 filed it two days late. They didn't allow enough time.

25 I'm, like, if you give me assurance the judge can't rule

Page 14

1 any other way, then I'll go with that. Otherwise, we've

2 got 30 exhibits we need to put on the record because the

3 defense is saying not one scintilla of evidence.

4 I said on the 9-16 hearing we need to be

5 compelling in taking care of all this fact that the

6 other side is saying they don't know that there's not a

7 -- that the discovery didn't end because there's a new

8 scheduling order, et cetera, et cetera. And suddenly

9 I'm told that the Court canceled the hearing on the

10 16th. And I started making inquiries of various people

11 in the court system about how could this date get

12 changed? And I believe you've seen the photo

13 previously, and the computer screen says that my

14 attorney agreed to change the date so that the defendant

15 -- defense's motion for summary judgment would be

16 timely, which would be completely contradictory to my

17 best interest, in light of the fact that we hadn't been

18 able to get discovery.

19 Now, I know you say you didn't do it. But

20 here is an e-mail, which again I'll swear is true and

21 correct, copy of what I received on September 8th. And

22 it's got me saying, "Darnit --

23 THE COURT: Excuse me, who's the author of the

24 e-mail?

25 MR. MASHAK: Mark Olson. I want my discovery,

Page 15

1 I want to get evidence on the record. I want to get the

2 amended complaint in. This is all going to happen on

3 September 16. We're not giving up September 16. You

4 can't give up September 16 without my consent.

5 And this is, in short, his response to me is:

6 You don't get it. The judge had a conflict. Now, I've

7 since made a complaint to the Minnesota Lawyers

8 Professional Responsibility Board asking -- again

9 asserting that the screen says that my counsel agreed to

10 move this date, which was clearly not in my best

11 interest. And in response to that, with the Lawyers

12 Board, he once again wrote back that the judge changed

13 the date.

14 And at the September 30th hearing, you

15 indicated that you had nothing to do with changing the

16 date. So something someplace along the line is wrong.

17 Doesn't matter to me, because to me it's consistent with

18 my entire perspective that the Minnesota Judiciary and

19 the Minnesota legal system is retaliating against me for

20 trying to bring forward and testify about evidence and

21 give evidence of corruption in the Minnesota judicial

22 system.

23 And that, again, that is a violation of the

24 First Amendment right to petition the government for

25 redress of grievances. So in any case, I get in an

Page 16

1 argument with Mr. Olson about: You will put these

2 exhibits on the record; you will file the amended

3 complaint as we agreed.

4 And he's saying: No, no, no, we're not doing

5 any of that.

6 I'm telling him we need to compel discovery.

7 We need to get the amended complaint. And again he's

8 telling me there's nothing to be done. We just got to

9 go to this hearing. I'm, like, you will file, because I

10 understand that if you don't have it in -- evidence or

11 testimony in an official form, it's as though it didn't

12 exist and you make your findings directly from only the

13 evidence in the crucible of justice.

14 No matter how many times I tell my attorney,

15 no matter how many times I tell my friends, no matter

16 how many times I post on the Internet or put it in the

17 paper, if you don't see it officially, it don't count.

18 And that was the basic conflict with Mr. Olson

19 was he was refusing to put the exhibits in and he was

20 refusing to compel discovery. And then he was refusing

21 to set -- or saying the Court wasn't willing to set a

22 hearing in order to get past the scheduling order deal.

23 Now, so then I went out after the September

24 30th hearing in which I said we are going to, you know,

25 continue these motions until I can find an attorney and

Page 17

1 I went out and found an attorney and I told him -- every

2 attorney I went to, because it took me about three weeks

3 to find one. I said: I'm going to tell you this is a

4 horrible case. It's messed up. Not through any fault

5 of my own, but because there's been too many fingers in

6 the pot. And I believe the judicial system is corrupt.

7 And they're retaliating against me because I didn't want

8 somebody telling me, well, you didn't tell me.

9 So it took me, like, three weeks to go through

10 20, 30 attorneys before one said that they would take it

11 and that they understood what the issue was.

12 And, again, this is extremely distressful to

13 me that this defense just made up some story, some

14 scandalous story, of accusations about me. This has

15 went on for two years; it should have been nipped in the

16 bud immediately. Justice delayed is justice denied.

17 In any case, so then I told Mr. Wolfgram --

18 and I believe I don't have to give you this because this

19 is already included in the documents that I've given

20 you -- you see there's a series of e-mails between

21 Mr. Wolfgram and myself where in October 28 I'm telling

22 him: You need to notice depositions. You need to

23 compel discovery. You need to get the amended complaint

24 in.

25 And I'm getting double talk from Mr. Wolfgram

Page 18

1 saying: Don't worry. We'll -- we have plenty of time.

2 I don't have to notice these right away. You've noticed

3 a month before for the depositions, so I don't have to

4 give them the full 30 days.

5 And he assures me, he says on top of this --

6 by this point in time, I, you know, I was suffering from

7 the disability that we've discussed due to all these

8 bizarre occurrences happening with this court case and

9 that I couldn't simply get a quick and speedy trial to

10 get this resolved.

11 And so I remember saying to him: I have to

12 trust you because this is killing me to question every

13 single thing that every single attorney does. And if

14 you look at those e-mails, you can see that I clearly

15 told him you need to have these filed -- do this stuff

16 immediately.

17 The judge isn't going to move the hearing

18 date. She's not going to do anything. And he's

19 assuring me.

20 And I told him: You go down to the court file

21 and you look in the court file because I don't want to

22 hear at some point in time you say I forgot to tell you

23 something. I will pay for that. You go down there

24 because that's the record. I don't want to ever hear

25 that something I forgot -- because I don't know what's

Page 19

1 important. I'm not an attorney. Something I think is

2 unimportant might be important. Didn't occur.

3 And during this whole time, he's telling me

4 the Court is refusing to set a hearing because you

5 demanded that it be in Isanti County. And I said:

6 That's a gross misrepresentation of what was said and

7 specifically I was asked which county do you want to

8 have it in?

9 And do you have copies of the transcript?

10 THE COURT: No, sir.

11 MR. MASHAK: Okay. So do you need me to swear

12 that these are true and correct? Or is it enough

13 that --

14 THE COURT: Any evidence that you want me to

15 consider must come in through affidavit or having you

16 swear to correctness on the record.

17 MR. MASHAK: Okay. So I swear that this is

18 true and accurate copies of page 1, page 5, page 4, and

19 page 31 of the September 30, 2010, hearings in the -- in

20 this matter.

21 And I draw the Court's attention to page 4.

22 And there's a typo here, but, as we had said, Isanti,

23 not Sherburne. But in any case: All future count (sic)

24 hearings will be scheduled in Isanti. I'm just simply

25 telling you it's more difficult, scheduling-wise, but we

Page 20

1 will accommodate it, and all future hearings will be

2 held in Isanti County.

3 And the important word there is accommodate.

4 But on top of that -- and so this is all going on in

5 early November. And as soon as Attorney Wolfgram says

6 to me, Hey, they're saying that you refused to have them

7 heard in Sherburne County. I said, You know, that's not

8 the way it was. I was offered a choice. I made the

9 choice. And of course if we can't have these heard

10 before the December 17, if I insist on having them in

11 Isanti County, by all means let's have them in Sherburne

12 County, but make sure the trial is still held in Isanti

13 County.

14 And for another 30 days I got to hear the

15 Court won't schedule, the Court won't schedule, the

16 Court won't schedule. And he's telling me don't worry

17 about the depositions, don't worry about the

18 depositions, don't worry about the depositions. And

19 this is consistent with --

20 THE COURT: Mr. Mashak, I said at the

21 beginning of this hearing that I would accommodate you

22 with reasonable breaks if you need them. Do you need a

23 break or --

24 MR. MASHAK: Yes. Yes. Yes. That would be

25 very, very helpful.

Page 21

1 THE COURT: 10 minutes enough, sir?

2 MR. MASHAK: I think so.

3 THE COURT: We'll stand in recess for 10

4 minutes. At 20 minutes to 4 on the clock, we'll

5 recommence.

6 MR. MASHAK: Thank you.

7 THE COURT: You're welcome, sir.

8 (A brief recess was taken.)

9 THE COURT: We're back on the record on Mashak

10 and First National Repossessors versus Meeks-Hull and

11 Hull. Mr. Mashak returns, all Court personnel have also

12 returned. Mr. Mashak, you may proceed.

13 MR. MASHAK: Okay. I want to first correct a

14 typo on the motion papers on page 2. It says "for two

15 weeks now." It should actually say "for three weeks."

16 And that's consistent with the Exhibit 39 from that same

17 -- from the affidavit of 12-29. That's an e-mail of

18 December 9, 2010, and it's from me to Attorney Wolfgram.

19 And the relevant portion is -- again, dated

20 December 9 -- for three weeks or more now Judge Yunker

21 has refused to set any hearing date for us before the

22 December 17, 2010, discovery and dispositive motion

23 deadline.

24 THE COURT: I'm sorry, which e-mail are you

25 referring to?

Page 22

1 MR. MASHAK: If you look, there's an affidavit

2 that's the 12-29 affidavit.

3 THE COURT: Yes, sir.

4 MR. MASHAK: Attached as an exhibit. It will

5 say at the bottom "E-39." I believe it's the very last

6 page of that.

7 THE COURT: I have that, sir.

8 MR. MASHAK: You see me writing to Attorney

9 Wolfgram for three weeks now or more.

10 THE COURT: I see it.

11 MR. MASHAK: Okay.

12 THE COURT: Also, sir, I note that document

13 has a lot of X's in it. Was that an alteration of the

14 original document?

15 MR. MASHAK: Yes. I just redacted stuff that

16 was attorney-client privileges. I'm sorry.

17 THE COURT: That's all right. Go ahead, sir.

18 MR. MASHAK: And so I've -- the Court

19 obviously knew that I needed to bring motions, the

20 motion to amend the complaint, the motion to compel

21 discovery, motion for punitive damages, all those

22 continued motions from September 30th, but my attorney

23 kept saying that they wouldn't set one.

24 In the meantime, I'm saying what about the

25 depositions? And he's saying, don't worry, there's

Page 23

1 plenty of time, I'll get them noticed. And I'm becoming

2 extremely frustrated.

3 THE COURT: Mr. Mashak, allow me to ask --

4 MR. MASHAK: Okay.

5 THE COURT: Is there evidence in the record or

6 do you have evidence of communication between

7 Mr. Wolfgram and the Court attempting to set motion

8 hearings during this time period?

9 MR. MASHAK: I'm sorry, Your Honor, I'm

10 thinking somebody I'm paying the big money to is doing

11 the job, and I didn't think that I had to question my

12 attorney about whether he was actually contacting the

13 Court or not. I assume as heated as the arguments got

14 and as much as he believed the defense of "the Court

15 just won't set one" that he's telling me the truth.

16 THE COURT: There's no written document that

17 you have or that you filed with the Court that documents

18 Mr. Wolfgram's request to the Court to set a hearing and

19 request denied?

20 MR. MASHAK: Right. And, in fact, I've asked

21 him for all my court files back and he's playing this

22 game of Simon says: You have to tell me when; and the

23 time I say, it won't work. And just again yesterday I

24 said I want to send somebody down between 8:30 and 10

25 today to pick up my court files. And I sent somebody

Page 24

1 down with a copy of my driver's license and a sheet

2 saying this person is authorized to pick up the records,

3 you say they're available to pick them up, and nobody

4 was in his office.

5 He called to tell me he didn't know when

6 somebody would be available to give me a file. In fact,

7 I don't have any of my court files as of this hearing.

8 But -- and I asked him for documentation

9 regarding contacting the Court and he hasn't given me

10 that, either. So in rapid succession, we get to

11 December 29 because I'm upset that -- and he's telling

12 me, don't worry, because the Court didn't make time

13 before December 17, it's your order, she's got to change

14 the scheduling order. She has to. Don't worry. This

15 is fine. She'll change it. It just would be grossly

16 unfair for you that because she didn't have time you

17 don't get to have your motion to compel, amended

18 complaint, et cetera, et cetera.

19 And, in fact, he said that in trying to set up

20 the deposition of Defendant Meeks-Hull, Dannette Meeks,

21 that she was saying because of the harassment

22 restraining order I couldn't even be in the deposition,

23 needed to talk to you about how that could be worked

24 out. Clearly there are ways to do that, electronically,

25 or behind a window or whatever it was.

Page 25

1 And they asked to have a teleconference with

2 you, and you refused to have a teleconference. And that

3 was the last week before the discovery deadline.

4 I'm sure you're aware then came December 29

5 where you said: Nope, I'm not changing any deadlines,

6 I'm not taking the amended complaint, I'm not

7 entertaining the motions to compel.

8 And then we came up with this -- and this is

9 difficult for me to say, but I've just got to say it,

10 this notion of suspense motions. And I've asked several

11 attorneys if they've ever heard of suspense motions from

12 the 9-30 hearing. I've looked in the Minnesota Rules of

13 General Practice.

14 I might not have it quite right, but I'm sure

15 you know what I'm talking to. I looked in the Minnesota

16 Rules of Civil Procedure and could find no reference to

17 suspense motions.

18 And it was my sense that my own attorney,

19 acting on behalf of the legal fraternity, understood

20 that what you were trying to do was to prevent some of

21 those motions from being heard. And so that is when he

22 took me in the back room and said: No, you shouldn't

23 enter any of this other stuff. You shouldn't enter your

24 motion, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

25 And there was yelling and screaming and he was saying he

Page 26

1 wasn't going to represent me anymore if I insisted on

2 doing this.

3 And here I'm sitting between I know that if

4 it's not on the record, it's as though it didn't happen

5 as far as the judge is concerned. And I have my

6 attorney telling me something completely different that

7 I know to be wrong. And he's threatening to withdraw,

8 and I'm not capable of knowing all the nuances of the

9 law.

10 And because of this idea suspense motions and

11 because of all of this, I had said: Okay; if you're

12 telling me that this is just a bad idea. And his story

13 was something about, well, what you're arguing is that

14 there's no material issues of fact. And if you go in

15 there and say that your side is there's no material

16 issues of fact, you're saying there is material issues

17 of fact.

18 And, of course, that is completely

19 wrong-headed thinking that doesn't even make any sense

20 because we're saying there's no issues of material fact

21 for us, not that there are not any material issues of

22 fact for them.

23 But in any case, you know all the rulings you

24 made there, and it denied me the right to get any --

25 $16,000, almost two years, I get a smattering of

Page 27

1 discovery on the very last day. And it just can't be.

2 Nobody could figure out to serve discovery 10 months

3 earlier, 12 months earlier, 13 months earlier? Nobody

4 could -- and then we have Olson saying for two and a

5 half months, from 7-9 to early September, that the judge

6 won't return my calls, the judge won't set a hearing,

7 which is consistent with what Wolfgram was saying was I

8 can't do anything, the Court won't set a hearing.

9 And clearly the Court knew that if I can't

10 compel discovery, if I can't amend my complaint that it

11 prejudices my case because I can't get evidence on the

12 record and I can't even say in the course of the

13 independent discovery that we did we discovered these

14 other causes of action and that we want to amend our

15 claim for that.

16 And worse, then I have my attorneys

17 blackmailing me, not just that they're going to quit by

18 doing something their certain way, but I have Wolfgram

19 telling me that if I don't sign something that says that

20 I am satisfied with his representation that he's going

21 to quit.

22 Now, I only got so much money and this has

23 damaged my business terribly. I can't -- I'm trapped.

24 I'm being exhorted that -- I've invested all this money

25 into this and every time you change attorneys, you've

Page 28

1 got to pay for them to relearn the case. Now I've got

2 Wolfgram saying: You need to sign a document that says

3 you're satisfied with my representation.

4 By this time I'm so absorbed with the

5 document, the issues in the document that I handed to

6 you just prior to us beginning this hearing, that I

7 don't know anymore. I'm just blown away that I even

8 have to deal with any of this.

9 This is a straightforward case of an employee

10 quit while I was out of the country, stole money,

11 embezzled money, stole company property, and then

12 purposely trashed a vehicle that I cosigned for her and

13 let it get repossessed. And suddenly two years later,

14 I'm the one whose life is destroyed. And I say it's by

15 deliberate machinations of the Court.

16 And, again, after the July -- January 9th

17 hearing, Wolfgram was, again: If you want me to

18 represent you, you need to sign a document that says

19 you're happy with my representation.

20 And all these things primarily instigated by

21 the fact that the Court from 7-9 to early September

22 wouldn't allow me to -- allow my attorneys, and wouldn't

23 respond to their correspondence, wouldn't set hearings,

24 that the December -- or the September 16 hearing, which

25 was reserved at 7-9, was mysteriously canceled. And the

Page 29

1 attorney insists, in multiple places that I have

2 documented and with Lawyers Professional Responsibility

3 Board, that the Court canceled that hearing, not him.

4 And then we have Wolfgram saying for several

5 months -- or for six weeks: She won't set any hearings

6 despite -- and you have the e-mails where right from the

7 beginning I made it clear to him what your instructions

8 were -- you aren't changing nothing, nothing was going

9 to change, that this had to be done, that he needed to

10 notice the depositions, that all these things had to

11 happen.

12 And he said he couldn't make them happen

13 because the Court wouldn't set a hearing. The Court

14 wouldn't entertain the amended complaint. The Court

15 wouldn't entertain the motion to compel discovery. That

16 the Court wouldn't work with them to resolve this issue

17 of Ms. Meeks saying she wouldn't want to be in the same

18 room with me, even by teleconference. This went on over

19 the course of two months.

20 I'm just going to go through and -- if it

21 please the Court, if we could take, like, 10 minutes so

22 I could gather my thoughts to make my final statements,

23 I'd appreciate that.

24 THE COURT: Certainly, Mr. Mashak. Can we

25 agree top of the hour? Is that enough time?

Page 30

1 MR. MASHAK: Yes, thank you.

2 THE COURT: You're welcome, sir. We stand in

3 recess until 4:00.

4 (A brief recess was taken.)

5 MR. MASHAK: Could I have one minute to look

6 at this?

7 THE COURT: Certainly.

8 (Mr. Mashak reviewing realtime.)

9 MR. MASHAK: Okay. Your Honor.

10 THE COURT: We are back on the record on

11 Mashak and First National Repossessors, Incorporated,

12 versus Meeks-Hull and Hull, defendants. Mr. Mashak, you

13 may proceed.

14 MR. MASHAK: Okay. I'm just going to take a

15 few minutes to go through anything I might have missed

16 along here and make some points in closing, and then I

17 should be done.

18 We've discussed the fact that by the Court not

19 setting hearings or allowing teleconferences it

20 prevented me from having motions and communications with

21 the Court to advance my case in terms of getting

22 discovery evidence on the record and amending my

23 complaint, punitive damages, et cetera, et cetera.

24 We talked about the cancelling of the 9-16

25 hearing. We talked about the suspense motions. And

Page 31

1 then I want to comment on the unusual efforts to prevent

2 recordings of proceedings on the December 29 hearing.

3 Law enforcement were used to do unlawful searches and

4 seizures of people at the direction of this Court to

5 prevent any recording, any possible recording. People

6 were required to take any recording devices and their

7 cell phones out to the cars, which is something I've

8 never experienced in my 52 years previously. Not that

9 I've been in Court that much, but that was unusual to me

10 and many people that I spoke to.

11 And then at the 1-9 hearing, apparently there

12 had been discussions between law enforcement and the

13 Court, and instead of having people take their cell

14 phones and their recording devices to their cars, the

15 Court merely asked myself and other people in the

16 gallery if they were recording and unusually asked

17 people in the gallery their names and indicated there

18 would be some kind of consequences for anybody recording

19 these hearings.

20 And, again, I hate challenging the Court on

21 this, but that would seem to indicate the Court had

22 something to hide that they didn't want documented.

23 Again, I refer to the Minnesota statute that I believe

24 supersedes any court rules that say anybody -- at least

25 one person party to a conversation they have the right

Page 32

1 to record it.

2 And then, oh, at the last hearing when you

3 made me only speak through my attorney and my attorney

4 was refusing to say the things that I wanted to say and

5 make the arguments I wanted to make, and I was

6 substantially stifled in getting things on the record

7 for appeal.

8 And then I'm going to touch on that the Court

9 refused to continue the hearing to deal with the

10 accommodations required by the Americans with

11 Disabilities Act. And go back to -- it just is

12 manifestly unjust that the Court would take months and

13 refuse to have hearings and then on December 17 --

14 before December 17 and then on December 29 say, well,

15 too bad, so sad, we set December 17, when the Court

16 effectively acted to prevent me from prosecuting my case

17 and getting discovery by refusing to have hearings

18 because the defense wasn't cooperating in the discovery

19 as the defense should have.

20 And had we had the 9-16 hearing or any hearing

21 between now and 9-17, I would have had -- the Court

22 would have been able to accept my amended complaint, the

23 Court would have been able to compel discovery, I would

24 have been able to work out the issues that the defense

25 brought up regarding the depositions.

Page 33

1 All these things demonstrated bias of the

2 Court. And I'm going to go back and say that while I

3 don't -- I have two different attorneys saying that the

4 Court wasn't returning their communications, wasn't

5 setting hearings, wasn't -- in the first instance, also,

6 you weren't putting out the scheduling order agreed to

7 on July 9.

8 And then the second case we have the attorneys

9 saying she won't set any hearings and just briefly

10 allegedly because I refused to have them heard in

11 Sherburne County when -- and even when that possible

12 communication happened, in short order, I said of course

13 if we can't have the hearing before December 17 unless

14 we have them in Sherburne, I'm not stupid, then we'll

15 have to have it in Sherburne, just make sure the trial

16 ends up being in Isanti.

17 And the other thing is, judges are aware that

18 all of this extra communication that I have with my

19 attorneys and changing attorneys costs money and most

20 people don't have unlimited resources. So by the very

21 act of making this litigation stall out farther and

22 farther, the Court knew that eventually I would run out

23 of money. And the Court knew that the allegations of

24 the defense were having an adverse impact on my income.

25 And, you know, this failing to set hearings so

Page 34

1 that the thing could quickly move to resolution, the

2 defense knows that they're lying. And once they're

3 forced to put things in writing and once they're forced

4 to depositions, I believe settlement happens quickly.

5 But when the Court's acting in this manner, it gives

6 them the belief that the Court's on their side. And I'm

7 sure that's what their attorney is telling them. You

8 don't have to settle nothing because basically what I'm

9 seeing, the Court's made up their mind how they want

10 this to come out.

11 You know, and along those lines, I'm just

12 going to say it's just not satisfactory that there's not

13 some policing of the court. The board of judicial

14 standards and the lawyers professional responsibility

15 boards are just jokes. They're black holes. Nobody

16 ever gets to know what goes on with those. Unless they

17 have a finding that somebody actually did something,

18 people don't know if there was ever any investigation at

19 all done.

20 And then all that information should have been

21 public record. The founding fathers said that all men

22 are fallen, and the only way to keep men from

23 temptation -- the best way to keep people from

24 temptation is transparency and accountability. And the

25 courts, by making the Board of Judicial Standards and

Page 35

1 making the Lawyers Board black holes, they've ended the

2 transparency, which gets us to the situation where you

3 have citizens being denied their right to petition the

4 government for redress of grievances to make it clear

5 that there is corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary.

6 In this particular instance, again, I believe

7 that the Minnesota legal system and the Minnesota courts

8 are retaliating against me for my lawful and

9 constitutionally specified right to petition the

10 government with grievances.

11 The courts in this case -- this woman just had

12 to make an allegation, in my opinion, and the Court said

13 we can use this, we're going to use this to demonize and

14 discredit this guy who's been making efforts to reform

15 and make accountable and transparent the Minnesota

16 Judiciary.

17 I want to go back to on either December 29 --

18 or January 9, you should have said, you know what, it's

19 not your fault we couldn't get you heard before the

20 deadline. Even though I set the hard deadline, it's

21 just not right, fair, just, equitable, unbiased for me

22 to say you don't get discovery, you don't get to amend

23 your Complaint, you don't get to amend for punitive

24 damages, you don't get to have depositions because the

25 Court knew that that biased my ability to collect

Page 36

1 evidence and to put evidence on the record.

2 And I'm going to close by saying that judges

3 and lawyers have full control over people's lives. The

4 rules are too complex for the average citizen to

5 understand. And the lawyers -- and us citizens come

6 forward and we trust lawyers that we pay big money to to

7 represent us. Unfortunately, in my opinion, what's

8 happened is some of them know how to -- know what the

9 court wants as a result.

10 And because most people -- most people

11 wouldn't even have -- average citizens wouldn't have the

12 ability to come before this Court like I have and say

13 this, this, this, this. To them, it's just a big black

14 box and they just know they got screwed.

15 And when people just know they got screwed,

16 then you have stuff like happened in Egypt where the

17 people just say: We know we're getting screwed. We

18 don't know exactly how we're getting screwed, but we

19 know we're getting screwed.

20 So these attorneys, they either willingly

21 betray their clients because that's the easy way, not to

22 make judges upset and be part of the judicial

23 fraternity, or they are just afraid to cross judges that

24 they appear in front of because the judges can destroy

25 their law practices.

Page 37

1 They've invested thousands of dollars in

2 getting an undergraduate degree, getting a law degree

3 and establishing a practice and the judicial fraternity

4 has the ability to destroy a person's law practice if a

5 lawyer crosses a judge.

6 But just in summary, all the things that I've

7 said here I believe constitute the bias -- demonstrate

8 the bias of the Court that the evidence that I've been

9 denied and the discovery that I've been denied

10 absolutely influenced the outcome of this case. And,

11 therefore, I believe that I have established that bias

12 has occurred and I believe that the Court should remove

13 itself from this matter.

14 And unless you have any questions, that's all

15 I have.

16 THE COURT: I have no questions, Mr. Mashak.

17 Thank you. We will recess this hearing at this time. I

18 will issue a written order on your motion. If you wish

19 to address the ADA concerns, I will go into a private

20 session so that we can privately communicate about that,

21 if you wish to do that, Mr. Mashak.

22 MR. MASHAK: I would wish to do that.

23 THE COURT: All right. That means we're going

24 to close the courtroom, ma'am, if you wouldn't mind

25 stepping out.

Page 38

1

2

3 (A confidential hearing was held and is contained

4 in a separate transcript.)

5

6

7 * * * *

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 46

1 STATE OF MINNESOTA

2 COUNTY OF SHERBURNE

3

4 I, Jennifer S. Sati, RMR, CRR, CBC, CRI,

5 District Court Reporter, hereby certify that the

6 foregoing pages are a true and correct transcript of my

7 stenographic notes taken relative to the afore-mentioned

8 matter on the 2nd day of February, 2011, in the City of

9 Elk River, County of Sherburne, and State of Minnesota,

10 before the Honorable Mary A. Yunker, Judge of District

11 Court.

12

13

14

15 SIGNED THIS 22nd day OF February, 2011.

16

17

18

19

20

___________________________________

21 Jennifer S. Sati Registered Merit Reporter

22 Certified Realtime Reporter Certified Broadcast Captioner

23 Certified Realtime Instructor Notary Public Comm. Expires 1-31-15

24

25

EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1

!

Exhibit 2 - You don't get it, the judge had a conflict

Exhibit 3 -

!
-----Original Message-----
From: CynicalPatriot
To: wolfgramclerk@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 9, 2010 7:32 am
Subject: recap of where we are at.

Hello

Just to document the recent events:

For 3 weeks or more now Judge Yunker has refused to set any hearing date for us before the December 17, 2010
Discovery and dispositive motion deadline?

Opposing Counsel has not returned your calls for discovery and depositions.

Because of how late this is all happening it will be more expensive for me, expedited transcripts.

And it is likely Yunker will rule against us based on her being corrupt.

And we can appeal but that will be expensive.

And the otherside will not settle because Judge Yunker has telegraphed to them that the fix is in.

Now, As I understand it this is one way that fixes are done.

I will not be allowed to do discovery so I cannot introduce evidence.

This is evidenced by Yunker cancelling the 9/15/2010 hearing and promoting a summary judgment hearing
by the Defense.

You understand that I want a Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment heard. I have already done one
that has already been submitted but I would expect it to be updated with new evidence....

Don Mashak

Exhibit 4

! WE Will Accomodate in Isanti County

Rep. Mary KiffMeyer and MN GOP Judiciary Committee Submit Judicial Reform Bill 015 to MN Revisor

2011-02-18T20:39:00.000-08:00

"02/04/11 09:18 AM HOUSE RESEARCH JV RP015
1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to courts; establishing a judicial code of ethics; amending Minnesota
1.3 Statutes 2010, section 43A.39, subdivisions 1, 2; proposing coding for new law
1.4 in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 480.
1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.6 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 43A.39, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
1.7 Subdivision 1. Prohibited acts; penalties. All employees shall comply with and aid
1.8 in all proper ways the enforcement of the provisions of this chapter. No employee or any
1.9 other person shall intentionally:
1.10 (a) Make any false oral or written statement, mark, rating or report concerning any
1.11 application, selection process, or appointment made under provisions of this chapter or in
1.12 any manner commit or attempt to commit any fraud preventing the impartial execution
1.13 of this chapter;
1.14 (b) Directly or indirectly, give, render, pay, offer, solicit, or accept any money, service
1.15 or other valuable consideration for any appointment, proposed appointment, promotion or
1.16 proposed promotion to, or any advantage in obtaining, a position in the civil service;
1.17 (c) Defeat, deceive, or obstruct any person in exercising rights under this chapter, or
1.18 furnish to any person any special or secret information for the purpose of affecting the
1.19 rights or prospects of any person with respect to appointment, advancement or retention
1.20 in the classified service;
1.21 (d) Violate the provisions of section 43A.37 or, 43A.38, or 480.115; or......"

To read the rest of the story for free, please click Examiner

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

Rep. Mary KiffMeyer & MN GOP Judiciary Committee Submit Judicial Reform Bill 016

2011-02-15T05:48:00.000-08:00

Rep. Mary KiffMeyer & MN GOP Judiciary Committee Submit Judicial Reform Bill 016

This is a teaser for an article I wrote on Examiner.com:

"This past week Rep. Mary KiffMeyer & MN GOP Judiciary Committee Submit Judicial Reform Bill 016 to the Minnesota Revisors office. The revisors office returned the following document.
Several other groups including TEA Party TAR, MN Northstar TEA Party Patriots and Justice in Minnesota are also seeking sponsors for various bills to bring Transparency, Accountability and Reform to the Minnesota Judiciary.

1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to judges; creating judicial election districts; amending the mandatory..."

To read the rest of the story for free, please click Examiner

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

A Bill to Establish a Code of Ethics and Eliminate Gratuities for Minnesota Judges

2011-02-01T18:16:00.000-08:00

Code of Ethics for the Judicial Branch

Gratuities for Judges

Use of State Property for Personal Gain

The objectives of this bill are to:

1. Establish a code of ethics for the judicial branch of Minnesota that is the same as for the legislative and executive branches of Minnesota.

2. Eliminate gratuities for judges except as allowed for legislators.

3. Restrict the use of state property by judges for personal profit.

______________________________________________________________________________

The legislature established a code of ethics for the executive department.

They established similar rules for members and employees of the legislature.

(For example, a ban on gratuities that are more than nominal)

Should not similar rules be established for the judicial branch?

______________________________________________________________________________

Code of ethics for the judicial branch; limitations on gratuities.

(Based on Minnesota Statutes §43A.38, Code of Ethics for the Executive Branch)

A bill relating to a code of ethics for the Judicial Branch of Minnesota’s Government.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Subdivision 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this section the following definitions shall apply:

(a) "Business" means any corporation, partnership, proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, self‑employed individual or any other legal entity which engages either in nonprofit or profit making activities.

(b) "Confidential information" means any information obtained under government authority which has not become part of the body of public information and which, if released prematurely or in non-summary form, may provide unfair economic advantage or adversely affect the competitive position of an individual or a business.

() "Private interest" means any interest, including but not limited to a financial interest, which pertains to a person or business whereby the person or business would gain a benefit, privilege, exemption or advantage from the action of a state agency or employee that is not available to the general public.

(D) “Personal relationship” means a relationship by blood, marriage or association such as membership or participation in a common organization, or having an association while attending a college or post graduate school, or sharing a residence, or working at the same time for the same employer, or having a personal friendship at any time, or otherwise appearing to have had such a relationship.

Subd. 2. Acceptance of gifts; favors; from other lawyers, law firms and employees of law firms. Justices of the Supreme Court of Minnesota, judges of the Minnesota Court of Appeals, state court judges, employees of state and county judicial agencies, who are hereinafter referred to collectively as employees of the judicial branch, shall not directly or indirectly receive or agree to receive any payment of expense, compensation, gift, reward, gratuity, favor, service or promise of future employment or other future benefit from any source, except the state, for any activity related to the duties of the employee unless otherwise provided by law. However, the acceptance of any of any of the following from other than a lawyer, law firm, or employee of a lawyer or law firm is not a violation of this subdivision:

(a) Gifts of nominal value or gifts or textbooks which may be accepted pursuant to section 15.43.

(b) Plaques or similar mementos recognizing individual services in a field of specialty or to a charitable cause.

() Payment of reimbursement expenses for travel or meals, not to exceed actual expenses incurred, which are not reimbursed by the state and which have been approved in advance by the Judicial Commission.

(d) Honoraria or expenses paid for papers, talks, demonstrations, or appearances made by employees on their own time for which they are not compensated by the state, provided that the honoraria or expense is reasonable in amount.

(e) Tips received by employees engaged in food service.

(f) A contribution to an election campaign in an election year of no more than five hundred ($500) Dollars as authorized by law.

Subd. 3. Use of confidential information. An employee in the judicial branch shall not use confidential information to further the employee's private interest, and shall not accept outside employment or involvement in a business or activity that will require the employee to disclose or use confidential information.

Subd. 4. Use of state property.

(a) An employee shall not use state time, supplies or state‑owned or leased property and equipment for the employee's private interests or any other use not in the interest of the state, except as provided by law.

(b) An employee may use state time, property, or equipment to communicate electronically with other persons including, but not limited to, elected officials, the employer, or an exclusive bargaining representative under chapter 179A, provided this use, including the value of the time spent, results in no incremental cost to the state or results in an incremental cost that is so small as to make accounting for it unreasonable or administratively impracticable.

() A judge or other judicial official shall not use state property (courthouse, judge’s chambers, any other state property) in the conduct of any activity for personal gain or any private interest such as a wedding ceremony during court business or nonbusiness hours unless he pays a rental fee of seventy-five ($75.00) dollars to the state within ten (10) days of the event.

(d) The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Minnesota shall issue a statewide policy on the use of electronic mail and other forms of electronic communications by judges. The policy is not subject to the provisions of chapter 14 or 179A. Appointing authorities in judicial branch shall issue policies on these issues for their employees. The policies shall permit state employees to make reasonable use of state time, property, and equipment for personal communications and shall address issues of privacy, content of communications, and the definition of reasonable use as well as other issues the Chief Justice and appointing authorities identify as necessary and relevant.

Subd. 5. Conflicts of interest. The following actions by an employee in the judicial branch shall be deemed a conflict of interest and subject to procedures regarding resolution of the conflicts, section 43A.39 or disciplinary action as appropriate:

(a) use or attempted use of the employee's official position to secure benefits, privileges, exemptions or advantages for the employee or the employee's immediate family or an organization with which the employee is associated which are different from those available to the general public;

(b) acceptance of other employment or contractual relationship that will affect the employee's independence of judgment in the exercise of official duties;

() actions as an agent or attorney in any action or matter pending before the employing agency except in the proper discharge of official duties or on the employee's behalf; or

(d) the solicitation of a financial agreement for the employee or entity other than the state when the state is currently engaged in the provision of the services which are the subject of the agreement or where the state has expressed an intention to engage in competition for the provision of the services; unless the Chief Justice or appointing authority waives this clause.

(E) participation in a judicial proceeding as a judge, referee, mediator or arbitrator if there has been or is a personal relationship as defined in subdivision 1 herein between the participant and a party or lawyer who appears in the proceeding.

Subd. 6. Determination of conflicts of interest. When an employee believes the potential for a conflict of interest exists, it is the employee's duty to avoid the situation. A conflict of interest shall be deemed to exist when a review of the situation by the employee, the appointing authority or the Chief Justice determines any one of the following conditions to be present:

(a) the use for private gain or advantage of state time, facilities, equipment or supplies or badge, uniform, prestige or influence of state office or employment;

(b) receipt or acceptance by the employee of any money or other thing of value from anyone other than the state for the performance of an act which the employee would be required or expected to perform in the regular course or hours of state employment or as part of the duties as an employee;

() employment by a business which is subject to the direct or indirect control, inspection, review, audit or enforcement by the employee;

(d) the performance of an act in other than the employee's official capacity which may later be subject directly or indirectly to the control, inspection, review, audit or enforcement by the employee.

Subd. 7. Resolution of conflict of interest. If an employee of the judicial branch or appointing authority determine that a conflict of interest exists, the matter shall be assigned to another employee who does not have a conflict of interest. If it is not possible to assign the matter to an employee who does not have a conflict of interest, interested persons shall be notified of the conflict and the employee may proceed with the assignment.

Subd. 8. Judge organizations; attorneys. It is a conflict of interest for a judge or judicial official to preside over, or be involved in a proceeding if the judge belongs to or participates In any organization, association or group that retains a law firm or lawyer to represent, lobby for, or provide services to the organization and the law firm or lawyer for the organization represents one of the parties to the proceeding or appears in the proceeding.

Subd. 9. Precedence of chapter 10A. Where specific provisions of chapter 10A apply to employees and would conflict with this section, the provisions of chapter 10A shall apply.

Subd. 10. Limits. This section shall not be interpreted to apply to any activity which is protected by sections 179A.01 to 179A.25 and collective bargaining agreements and practices thereunder nor to prevent a current or former employee from accepting employment with a labor or employee organization representing employees.

Posted by

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

MN Meeting of TEA Party TAR Judicial Reform Committee Dec 26 2010

2010-12-25T18:54:00.001-08:00

!
This is an excerpt from an article that I wrote on Examiner.com:

Minnesota Judges want to take away our right to vote for Judges in meaningul, contested elections and we are not going to let them.

The next meeting of the TEA Party Transparency, Accountability and Reform Judicial Reform Committee will be held Sunday December 26, 2010 at 2:00PM. We will meet at Perkins Restaurant, St. Paul Midway area, 1544 University Avenue West, near the intersection of Snelling and University Avenues (about a block North of Snelling and I-94).(map)

Agenda:

Refine, add to, modify list of proposed judicial reform
...........

To read the rest of the story (for free) please click here Examiner.com

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

NowPublic

Proposed Minnesota Judicial Reform 1 of 2

2010-12-17T08:25:00.000-08:00

==================================================
"INTRODUCTION

In two previous articles I wrote regarding the formation of TEA Party Transparency, Accountability and Reform (TAR)group. In another article, I wrote about some suggested readings to understand the extent of the problem of judicial corruption in Minnesota. This document represents 5 years of drafting and redrafting of individual proposals to address specific area of reform, many of which were contained in the last bienniums bills HR 1632 Minnesota Judicial Reform and Accountability. This is the current iteration of one avenue of Judicial Reform that TPTAR's Judiciary committee is pursuing.
[ i ]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Synopsis and Comment

Table of Contents

Introduction.........................................................................................i

Judge Performance and Candidate Qualification Evaluation Board........................... 1

Judge Accountability - Judge Oversight Board.................................................. 2

Common Sense Board.............................................................................. 3

Public Financing of Judge Election Campaigns at no cost to Taxpayers...................... 4

Judge elections by vote of the people............................................................. 5

Prohibition on gratuities for judges and judicial branch Employees........................... 8

Rule of Judicial Immunity abrogated............................................................... 9

Right of citizens to get a grand jury investigation............................................... 9

Requirement for judges to follow court rules of Procedure......................................10

Requirement for judges to follow the Constitution and the law.................................10

Prohibition on tampering with transcripts and Evidence..........................................11

Court administrator controlled court video and sound recordings................................12

District court decisions by elected judges only......................................................12

Certification of decisions and orders by judges.....................................................13

Code of Ethics for the judicial branch of government..............................................13

New bar examination and lawyer licensing Board...................................................14

Lawyer Oversight Board................................................................................15

Limitations on jailing a person in a civil proceeding without bail or a trial......................15

Prevention of wrongful termination of parental Custody............................................16

Right of parent to meaningful visitation with their child; family Conciliation Court.............17

Right to criticize judges; retaliation Prohibited......................................................18

Enforcement of penalties against judges by a pay Cutoff...........................................19

Attorney’s fees paid all or in part by Loser............................................................19

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PROPOSED GROUPINGS FOR JUDICIAL REFORM BILLS

Group 1 - Judge Performance and Candidate Qualification Board Public Financing of Judge Election Campaigns at no cost to taxpayers Right of Citizens to get a grand jury investigation Right to criticize judges; retaliation prohibited Enforcement of penalties against by a pay cutoff...."

To read the rest of the Article for free, Please visit Examiner.com

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

!
Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names
!

Judicial Corruption - Suggested Reading - Minnesota USA

2010-12-13T10:55:00.000-08:00

!
This is an except from an article I wrote on Examiner.com:

"These books and literature should be of interest of you, especially if you think you might ever have to appear before a judge..

In Minnesota we have Judges trying to take away our right to vote for Judges in contested elections.

The rational of these judges is that allegedly there is little or no corruption in Minnesota.They then go on to say that we must protect this allegedly near perfect system from the corrupting influence of campaign Contributions and Political parties.(focus on the comments, not the main article propaganda of this link)

But the Black Robed (redacted for decorum) Judges of Minnesota's entire premise that there is little or no corruption in Minnesota has been fraudulently manufactured.

For the past 5 years the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees have refused to hear evidence of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. As a symptom of the systemic corruption in Minnesota Government, Hundreds of Minnesota Citizens have been denied their first amendment right to petition the Government with our grievances without actual or threatened retaliation......"

To read the rest of the Article, Please visit Examiner.com

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

Click here to purchase: Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

Is USA Justice Broken? Overcoming Government Legal Failure (Oakland, CA; 12/9/10)

2010-11-09T07:31:00.000-08:00

!

"If we want to reform the legal system, we must change the rules of the game so that the individual incentives of judges, lawyers, juries, and other legal actors motivate them to act in the larger social interest." So argues Edward Lopéz in The Pursuit of Justice, a thoroughgoing book on government legal failure--the bureaucratization and politicization of the U.S. legal system and how the law really works in practice rather than in theory. From fingerprinting to criminal sentencing, from lawyer licensing to judicial selection, and from eminent domain to wealth transfers via class-action lawsuits, how do perverse incentives impact the law and what reforms would create a more just and efficient legal system?

Join Professor Lopéz (San Jose State University), David Friedman (Santa Clara University), and Judge Alex Kozinski (U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit) as they discuss the faulty incentives at the heart of legal failures and whether market-based reforms would create a more just and efficient system of law.

Speakers:

Edward Lopéz is Associate Professor of Law and Economics, San Jose State University. He is the editor of The Pursuit of Justice, a path-breaking analysis of the problems of the U.S. legal system.

David Friedman is Professor of Law, Santa Clara University. He is the author of the books Future Imperfect: Technology and Freedom in an Uncertain World, Law's Order: An Economic Account, Hidden Order: The Economics of Everyday Life, and The Machinery of Freedom.

Alex Kozinski is Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. His scholarly articles have appeared in such journals as Harvard Law Review, Virginia Law Review, Yale Law Journal, Columbia Journalism Review, Michigan Law Review, Texas Law Review, ABA Journal, Stanford Law Review, and Washburn Law Journal, and his popular writings have been published in Slate, New Yorker, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Forbes, New Republic, Wilson Quarterly and National Review.

When:

Thursday, December 9, 2010
Wine & Cheese Reception: 6:30 PM
Program: 7:00 PM

Where:

The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, Calif.
Map and Directions

Admission:

$15 • $10 for Institute Members.
$35 Special Admission includes one copy of The Pursuit of Justice • $30 for members
Reserve Tickets Today
Event webpage

Praise for The Pursuit of Justice: Law and Economics of Legal Institutions, edited by Edward Lopéz:

"The American legal system is not just fraying at the edges, in some ways it is fundamentally broken. The Pursuit of Justice is a cutting-edge look at what went wrong and where to go from here. Everyone interested in law and economics should read it."
--Tyler Cowen, Holbert C. Harris Chair of Economics, George Mason University, co-author, MarginalRevolution.com

"The Pursuit of Justice does a wonderful job of using modern methods of social science to examine the actual effects of law, as differentiated from its apparent intent. This volume offers substantial insight into the way the legal system works in practice, and how it can be improved."
--Randall G. Holcombe, DeVoe Moore Professor of Economics, Florida State University

"Judges, police, prosecutors and lawyers are all people with their own goals and constraints. They may care about social welfare, but they certainly care about other things as well. The discipline of Public Choice has contributed greatly to our understanding of political behavior by taking this perspective with respect to politicians. The Pursuit of Justice begins the very important process of applying this insight to the functioning of the legal system. The American legal system has many flaws, and this most insightful book will contribute both to understanding the source of these flaws and then to fixing them."
--Paul H. Rubin, Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Economics and Law, Emory University

Purchase The Pursuit of Justice.

Read a detailed book summary.

Event Webpage: "Is U.S. Justice Broken? Overcoming Government Legal Failure"

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

TellMyPolitician

!

Press Release - Historic Minnesota 10th Judicial District Town Hall; September 29, 2010

2010-09-25T08:51:00.000-07:00

PRESS CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Walter Hudson
Office: 612-720-5710

Minnesota North Star TEA Party Patriots to Hold
Historic Judicial Town Hall

MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota (September 24, 2010) – North Star
Tea Party Patriots, a recently announced coalition of Tea
Party groups in Minnesota, will hold a Judicial Town Hall in
Monticello MN Wednesday, September 29th, 2010
at 7pm - 9pm. (map) The forum will be held in the city
council chambers of Monticello otherwise Known at the
Mississippi Room.

Candidates will give brief Biographies and then field
questions from the Moderator Attorney Marjorie Holsten.

13 of the 24 candidates seeking election to the open seat in Court 3 of
Minnesota’s 10th Judicial District have confirmed their participation in the
forum. The race is the most widely contested judicial election in the state.
The vast majority of judicial incumbents will go unchallenged this November.

To the best of our knowledge, this will be the
first Judicial Forum of this type in the history
of the State of Minnesota.

It comes in the wake of several legal victories by
contested judicial election advocate and
Minnesota Supreme Court Candidate
Greg Wersal, attorneys seeking election to the
bench in Minnesota have greater latitude than
they have in the past to express their views on
legal and political issues.

As a result of these suits, the US Supreme Court
has struck down many restrictions that Minnesota
previously placed on Candidates for Judge.

The Minnesota Tenth Judicial District includes the Minnesota Counties of Wright,
Washington, Sherburne, Pined, Kanabec, Isanti, Chisago, Anoka. These Counties
respective County Seats are, Buffalo, Elk River, Pine City, Mora, Cambrige,
Center City, Anoka.

Minnesota North Star Tea Party Patriots hopes to provide voters
in the 10th District the opportunity to cast their ballot as informed
as possible.

[ Monticello MN lies on both sides of I-94 | 20 miles NW of Maple Grove, MN ]
[ 40 miles NW of downtown Minneapolis - follow I-94 West]
[ 30 miles from St. Cloud MN - follow I-94 East ]
[ 50 miles from Cambridge MN - Click for route map ]
[ 30 miles from Princeton MN - Click for route map ]
[ 56 miles from Woodbury MN - Click for route map ]

Minnesota TEA Party Patriots Website

###

Contact Walter Hudson at 612-720-5710 waltershudson@yahoo.com

TellMyPolitician

Video: MN Supreme Court Candidate Greg Wersal interview by Sue Jeffers Part 1 /3 Rule of Law not whim of Judges

2010-09-09T19:03:00.000-07:00

!

PLEASE SUPPORT GREG WERSAL FOR MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT JUDGE

WHY?

YOU KNOW THAT LONG LIST OF JUDGES' NAMES AT THE END OF
THE BALLOT WITH NAMES OF PEOPLE YOU DO NOT KNOW...

THIS YEAR, YOU MUST NOT IGNORE IT BECAUSE

SOMETHING EVIL THIS WAY COMES:

YOUR LEGISLATORS AND JUDGES ARE CONSPIRING TO TAKE
AWAY YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO VOTE FOR JUDGES....
THEY CAN DRESS IT UP AND PITCH IT ANY WAY THEY WANT BUT
JUST REMEMBER ONE THING.... OUR GOVERNMENT WANTS THIS,
OUR GOVERNMENT IS PROMOTING THIS...
DO YOU THINK A CHANGE THE GOVERNMENT IS PUSHING WILL
BENEFIT THE AVERAGE CITIZEN OR THEM?.

COMBAT THIS EVIL ATTEMPT TO
TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE
FOR JUDGES BY VOTING:

GREG WERSAL
MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT JUDGE

THIS FALL, MAKE SURE YOU VOTE FOR GREG WERSAL FOR
MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT JUDGE. GREG WERSAL VIGOROUSLY
OPPOSES THE GOVERNMENT TAKING AWAY YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE
FOR YOUR JUDGES.
GREG WERSAL BELIEVES JUDGES ARE PUBLIC SERVANTS NOT ROYALTY.
SUPREME COURT CANDIDATE GREG WERSAL BELIEVES JUDGES SHOULD
BE HONEST AND ACCOUNTABLE.

GREG WERSAL HAS TAKEN ON, FOUGHT AND BEAT THE STATUS QUO.

WITH MULTIPLE RULINGS HE HAS WON AT THE US SUPREME COURT LEVEL.

WHO DO YOU THINK WILL REPRESENT YOU BETTER? JUDGES THAT GO
ALONG WITH THE STATUS QUO OR THOSE PERSONS WHO HAVE
DEMONSTRATED BY DEED THEIR WILLINGNESS TO HOLD THE STATUS QUO

ACCOUNTABLE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW?

THIS TYRANNICAL ATTEMPT TO TAKE AWAY
OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO VOTE FOR
JUDGES DEMANDS WE TAKE ACTION AND PAY
ATTENTION TO THOSE JUDICIAL RACES ON
THE BACK PAGE OF THE BALLOT THIS FALL.

AGAIN, PLEASE SUPPORT GREG WERSAL
FOR MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT JUDGE.

Still not convinced....

Would you like the ability to talk to Judicial Candidates just like talking to you next
door neighbor?

Go to "Justice in Minnesota" and click on Events.
Most Sunday nights they have "Judicial Teleconferences" with Judges from all over the state
calling in. They is always a portion of each teleconference that is kinda "over the back fence"
laid back in nature. Ask those questions that those "black robed Royalty" smugly and
arrogantly refuse to answer. I think a willingness to take questions "without a net" is a pretty
good measure of a Judge's Integrity and attitude toward common citizens. Please join us.

If you would like to Learn more or get involved, check out at the links below

Wersal for Justice
Official site for Greg Wersal for Minnesota Supreme Court Judge
Help us restore the Rule of Law and dismantle the Status Quo Whim of Judges and
Might Makes Right!
Vote for a Vigorous Defender of your Constitutional Right to Vote for your Minnesota
Judges in free, open and meaningful elections.

Minnesota Judicial Reform and Accountability TEA Party

Minnesota Northstar TEA Party Patriots Coalition

TEA PARTY - Planning the 2nd Enlightenment (Part 1 of 3)

2010-09-01T18:18:00.000-07:00

This is an excerpt from an article I wrote in re "The Enlightenment" on Examiner.com. Please click the Link at the end of the article to read the rest of the article.

Our USA Constitution and Bill of Rights were born out of the philosophies and reasoning developed during a period of World History known as "The Enlightenment" [ http://digg.com/d31Wtni?t ]. Many of our Founding Father's are noted as important figures in the Enlightenment Movement.( Franklin, Jefferson, Madison, Paine [ http://digg.com/d31Wu82?t ] ) And these same Founding Fathers incorporated many of the principles developed during The Enlightenment into our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Among these then radical thoughts were "Natural Law" , "Uncircumscribed Rational Thought", "Consent of the Governed", "Equality of Citizens and Sovereigns", "Self-Determination", "Public Sphere (Opinion)", "Property Rights" and "Absolute Truth".

Please click here to read the rest of the article - Examiner.com

Those were my thoughts.

As Always, I write with the same intention as Thomas Paine. I seek no leadership role, I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own "Common Sense"

In Liberty,

Don Mashak,
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak

Video of Mille Lacs County TEAPARTY Patriots Judicial Retention Election Townhall 7/29/10

2010-08-26T00:08:00.000-07:00

This is an except from an article that i wrote in re Judicial Retention Elections in Minnesota on Examiner.com. Please click the link and the bottom of the excerpt to view the rest of the article and view the video.

Provided herein is the video from the then upcoming event that I previously reported on: Mille Lacs County Minnesota TEA Party Patriots Judicial Retention Election Town hall Rather than report to you what happened, I think I will just give an overview and let you the viewer come to your own conclusions. A Picture is worth a Million Words. In Minnesota, the Government and Judges want to take away our Right to Vote for Judges and Replace it with Judicial Retention Elections. This is premised on the Quie Commission's manufactured perspective that we have little or no corruption in...

Proposed Grand Jury Legislation shakes up Minnesota Legislature Status Quo?

2010-03-19T08:31:00.000-07:00

This is a preview of a story that I wrote on Examiner.com regarding proposed Grand Jury Legislation in Minnesota.
[q url="http://www.examiner.com/x-11172-Minneapolis-Independent-Examiner~y2010m3d17-Proposed-Grand-Jury-Legislation-shakes-up-the-Minnesota-Legistlature-Status-Quo"]
The Minnesota Legislature wants to take away your right to vote for judges. They want the Governor to appointment them to prevent citizens from voting crooked judges out for outrageous behavior. Enough said on that topic for now.
Those of you that have been following my writing know that I have been involved with a group in pursuing Minnesota Judicial Reform and Accountability. And you know this group of Patriots has been trying to get Minnesota Judicial Reform and Accountability heard for four years.
For those of you that have not been following my writing you can read of some of the outrageous antics of the Minnesota Legislature's attempts to prevent Minnesota Judicial Reform and , Accountability from being heard. Here is a list of my related articles on this judicial saga in reverse chronological order....
[/q]

To read the rest of the story for free please click here. Examiner.com

To read about the related TEA Party ' Minnesota Judicial Reform and Accountability Rally March 19, 2010 at 3p at the St. Paul Minnesota Capitol building please click < here >

I write this articles, as I do all my articles, with the same intent of Thomas Paine.
I seek no leadership role, I seek only to allow the the American people to find their own way using their own common sense.

Those were my thoughts.

Don Mashak

The Cynical Patriot

TellMyPolitician

TEA PARTY / MINNESOTA JUDICIAL REFORM AND ACCOUNTABILITY RALLY

2010-03-13T07:51:00.000-08:00

Type: Causes - Rally
Date: Friday, March 19, 2010
Time: 3:00pm - 6:30pm
Location: 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St Paul MN 55155
State Capitol Building, South Steps and Upper Mall MAP http://twurl.cc/2bd6

FACEBOOK EVENT PAGE http://twurl.cc/2bed
Minnesota Judicial Reform and Accountability http://twurl.cc/2bc4
TEA Party & Lawful Political Dissent http://twurl.cc/2beg

This is a Rally to force the Minnesota Legislature to hear testimony on Judicial Corruption in the State of Minnesota. Further, to force the legislature to hear and debate proposed MN HR 1632 and Grand Jury Legislation.

WE THE PE0PLE have allowed our Minnesota Judiciary to become corrupt. Instead of the rule of law we now have whim of judges and justice to the highest bidder. The Legislature has abdicated its duty to oversee and discipline judges. Judges have written rules that allow them to take tips, otherwise known as bribes. They have their own rules that say they don't have to follow their own rules. They even have rules that say they don't have to follow state statutes.

FOR FOUR YEARS A GROUP OF PATRIOTS HAVE UNSUCCESSFULLY FOUGHT TO HAVE THIS TESTIMONY AND LEGISLATION HEARD IN MINNESOTA SENATE AND HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEES.

The Chair persons of those committees, Senator Moua and Representative Mullery have successfully prevented hearing of testimony and the legislation by their whim.

We have been told that if we can put 5000 people on the Capital Steps, the Legislature will be force to hear theses matters by the weight of public opinion.

Currently the following people will be speaking:

Representative Dan Severson = Author of HR 1632
Jack Graham - Candidate for Minnesota Attorney General
Tim Kinley - Christian imprisoned for using the bible to teach religion to his own children

This list will grow as we get confirmations from other speakers.

If you have an interest in speaking, Please let us know.

If you think the Family Courts and Divorce should be reformed, this rally is the place to be!

If you think minorities are unjustly treated by judges, this rally is the place to be!

If you think you should be able to continue to vote for judges, this rally is the place to be!

If you are dissatisfied with the Minnesota Judiciary for any other reason, this is the place to be!

Minnesota Legislature Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Corruption March 2009, Part 1 of 2

The House and Senate Judiciary Committee refused to allow testimony, hence this "Ad Hoc Committee Setting. For 4 years, a coalition of groups and Citizens have tried to have legislation on Judicial REform and Accountability heard in both houses of the Minnesota Legislature. Senator Mee Moua of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Representative Joe Mullery of the House Judiciary Committee refuse to allow testimony to be heard and legislation to be brought forward. Senator Moua and Representative Mullery, do you think 4 years of diligent Citizen lobbying is sufficient to have Committee hearings this year?

Minnesota Legislature Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Corruption March 2009, Part 2 of 2

Look Forward to seeing you there.

Don Mashak

The Cynical Patriot

Don Mashak's MN 5th Judicial District Free Press

LEGALEVIL This is my letter responding to MN 10th Judicial District Assistant Chief Judge Hoffman's error laden, RICO Conspiracy abetting response to my letter demanding my Court Transcripts

Response by MN 10th Judicial District Assistant Chief Judge Hoffman to my just previous letter demanding my Court Transcripts

PUBLIC DEMAND FOR TRANSCRIPTS FROM 10TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE BLOOMQUIST

MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN TERRORISM AND BULL ROAR!

Strap on your thinking caps if you love Freedom - Locke vs Hobbes

Tooth Fairy, Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, TV Pro-Wresting, Reality TV and the US 2 Major Party Political System Part 1 of 2

Legal Evil? In their own words - Part 1 of 3

Government Corruption - Who watches the Watchmen?

Minnesota Judicial Code Red - You Can't Handle the Truth!

First Principles, People Are Equal Under Natural Law

Chaos Theory, Rank & File Wisconsin Public Employees & True Grassroots TEA Party

This is how the Minnesota Judiciary System Fixes Court Cases

Rep. Mary KiffMeyer and MN GOP Judiciary Committee Submit Judicial Reform Bill 015 to MN Revisor

Rep. Mary KiffMeyer & MN GOP Judiciary Committee Submit Judicial Reform Bill 016

Rep. Mary KiffMeyer & MN GOP Judiciary Committee Submit Judicial Reform Bill 016

A Bill to Establish a Code of Ethics and Eliminate Gratuities for Minnesota Judges

MN Meeting of TEA Party TAR Judicial Reform Committee Dec 26 2010

Proposed Minnesota Judicial Reform 1 of 2

Judicial Corruption - Suggested Reading - Minnesota USA

Is USA Justice Broken? Overcoming Government Legal Failure (Oakland, CA; 12/9/10)

Press Release - Historic Minnesota 10th Judicial District Town Hall; September 29, 2010

PRESS CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT

Minnesota North Star TEA Party Patriots to Hold Historic Judicial Town Hall

Video: MN Supreme Court Candidate Greg Wersal interview by Sue Jeffers Part 1 /3 Rule of Law not whim of Judges

TEA PARTY - Planning the 2nd Enlightenment (Part 1 of 3)

Video of Mille Lacs County TEAPARTY Patriots Judicial Retention Election Townhall 7/29/10

Proposed Grand Jury Legislation shakes up Minnesota Legislature Status Quo?

TEA PARTY / MINNESOTA JUDICIAL REFORM AND ACCOUNTABILITY RALLY

Minnesota North Star TEA Party Patriots to Hold
Historic Judicial Town Hall