<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Douglas Radburn - douglasradburn.co.uk</title>
	
	<link>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk</link>
	<description>Just another weblog typed by a web monkey...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DouglasRadburn" /><feedburner:info uri="douglasradburn" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>DouglasRadburn</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Facebook Zero – Who cares?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/Mn5FYHVv5z4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/facebook-zero-who-cares/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook has released a new version of Facebook aimed specifically at mobile phones in what can only be an effort to save bandwidth for mobile networks.  The new version is being dubbed &#8220;Facebook Zero&#8221; and can be found at zero.facebook.com.  As with other facebook sites, you can attempt to get to this one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook has released a new version of Facebook aimed specifically at mobile phones in what can only be an effort to save bandwidth for mobile networks.  The new version is being dubbed &#8220;Facebook Zero&#8221; and can be found at <a href="http://zero.facebook.com">zero.facebook.com</a>.  As with other facebook sites, you can attempt to get to this one in a normal browser, but you&#8217;ll most likely get redirected to <a href="http://m.facebook.com">m.facebook.com</a> (their normal mobile site) if your network doesn&#8217;t support it.</p>
<p>The new site works by omitting data like photos that would be deemed &#8220;data intensive&#8221; by phone networks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/facebook-zero.gif"><img src="http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/facebook-zero-150x150.gif" alt="Facebook Zero image from TechCrunch" title="facebook-zero" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-223" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/16/facebook-launches-zero-a-text-only-mobile-site-for-carriers/">Techcrunch</a> was able to get hold of the image to the right which shows the potential for a premium version of the service.  There are suggestions that networks could introduce the free version as a base app on mobile devices (even though many newer handsets already support the likes of <a href="http://touch.facebook.com">touch.facebook.com</a> straight out the box or as a quick download from their respective application stores.  This would then allow carriers to potentially monetise the premium version themselves &#8211; restricting access to only those who pay.</p>
<p>Techcrunch also go on to post a PR piece from Facebook:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Zero&#8221; is a light-weight version of m.facebook.com that omits data intensive applications like Photos. It will launch in coming weeks and we are discussing it at MWC as an option to make Facebook on the mobile web available to everyone, anywhere and allow operators to encourage more mobile Internet usage.</p></blockquote>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/Mn5FYHVv5z4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/facebook-zero-who-cares/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/facebook-zero-who-cares/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Unicode</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/fIShRQFHxKw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/unicode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been interesting to see the rise of Unicode (now version 5.2).  Its&#8217; usage is a boon to programming types, but also to the everyday public as Google have just announced their support for the latest standard, adding somewhere near 6,600 new characters to their search algorithm.

Google have been tracking Unicode usage through its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been interesting to see the rise of Unicode (now version 5.2).  Its&#8217; usage is a boon to programming types, but also to the everyday public as <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/unicode-nearing-50-of-web.html">Google</a> have just announced their support for the latest standard, adding somewhere near 6,600 new characters to their search algorithm.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/unicode.png"><img src="http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/unicode-500x375.png" alt="Unicode Reaching 50%" title="Unicode" width="450" height="350" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-218" /></a></p>
<p>Google have been tracking Unicode usage through its index for quite some time now and I&#8217;m sure other major search engines will be refreshing their search algorithms to the new standard if they haven&#8217;t already.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/fIShRQFHxKw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/unicode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/unicode/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>SwankyMaison.com</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/qpCA3j24p6I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/swankymaison-com-website-build/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Full XHTML &#038; CSS Build from supplied Photoshop files and then built on a custom PHP framework.  Integration of a WordPress blog into the &#8220;thoughts&#8221; section of the site.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_211" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 417px"><a href="http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/swankymaison.jpg"><img src="http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/swankymaison-407x800.jpg" alt="Swankymaison.com" title="Swankymaison" width="480" height="800" class="size-medium wp-image-211" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Swankymaison.com</p></div>
<p>Full XHTML &#038; CSS Build from supplied Photoshop files and then built on a custom PHP framework.  Integration of a WordPress blog into the &#8220;thoughts&#8221; section of the site.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/qpCA3j24p6I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/swankymaison-com-website-build/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/swankymaison-com-website-build/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Disk Space</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/MedRFHeDJ7Y/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-disk-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google announced this week on its blog that you will now be able to upload up to 250mb files onto 1gb of storage on it&#8217;s cloud system.
Many news outlets have noted that Microsoft&#8217;s Sky Drive &#8211; which Google is going into direct competition with &#8211; offers 25gb straight off the bat.  Also, many other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google announced this week on <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/upload-your-files-and-access-them.html">its blog</a> that you will now be able to upload up to 250mb files onto 1gb of storage on it&#8217;s cloud system.</p>
<p>Many news outlets have noted that Microsoft&#8217;s Sky Drive &#8211; which Google is going into direct competition with &#8211; offers 25gb straight off the bat.  Also, many other services, such as <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/">DropBox</a> already offer large scale data redundancy and synchronised backup.</p>
<p>However, this is Google.  It&#8217;s not like they&#8217;re pushed for space.  GMail started off at this kind of mark and increased to 2.5gb fairly quickly (although we&#8217;re talking emails&#8230; not &#8220;large graphics files, RAW photos, ZIP archives and much more&#8221; that Google themselves are pushing).</p>
<p>Of course, this begs the obvious question&#8230; why?  My best bet would be on ChromeOS.  The whole idea being based around Google Gears, Google Docs and Google&#8217;s Cloud.  And there you have it.  Google aren&#8217;t going to tell it&#8217;s customers to go and use Dropbox or Sky Drive, are they?</p>
<p>What everyone fails to notice is Google Mail &#038; Picasa online storage pricing options that scale all the way up to 16TB.  Who needs that much space?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/MedRFHeDJ7Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-disk-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-disk-space/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Google launches a URL Shortner for Google Products</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/Uv8-HSobbBw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-launches-a-url-shortner-for-google-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google have released a URL shortner at http://goo.gl/ &#8211; following in the foot-steps of sites like http://bit.ly/ and http://pig.ly/.  However, Google&#8217;s URL Shortner is only for use within Google Toolbar and FeedBurner.
More news in the press release here : Google Blog
Facebook &#8211; somewhat of an arch rival of Google &#8211; have been rolling out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google have released a URL shortner at <a href="http://goo.gl/">http://goo.gl/</a> &#8211; following in the foot-steps of sites like <a href="http://bit.ly/">http://bit.ly/</a> and <a href="http://pig.ly/">http://pig.ly/</a>.  However, Google&#8217;s URL Shortner is only for use within Google Toolbar and FeedBurner.</p>
<p>More news in the press release here : <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/making-urls-shorter-for-google-toolbar.html">Google Blog</a></p>
<p>Facebook &#8211; somewhat of an arch rival of Google &#8211; have been rolling out a URL shortner for a short while on their mobile system.  Any link in the m.facebook.com stream is auto-shortened using using fb.me.  For example &#8211; <a href="http://fb.me/chickenland">fb.me/chickenland</a> would take you to my page on Facebook.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/Uv8-HSobbBw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-launches-a-url-shortner-for-google-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-launches-a-url-shortner-for-google-products/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>HTML Emails</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/Uc2xsHlXHCw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/html-emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The subject of HTML emails usually ends up in a 2 hour long discussion about all the hacks and work arounds that need to be put into place to get it working in the series of test mail clients and online &#8220;clients&#8221; that you&#8217;re supporting.
That list of course could be tiny, or very extensive.
Whilst trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The subject of HTML emails usually ends up in a 2 hour long discussion about all the hacks and work arounds that need to be put into place to get it working in the series of test mail clients and online &#8220;clients&#8221; that you&#8217;re supporting.</p>
<p>That list of course could be tiny, or very extensive.</p>
<p>Whilst trying to find out why Hotmail wanted to fill my email with lots of margins breaking the layout, I Googled to find an answer and came across <a href="http://www.viget.com/inspire/hotmail-image-problems-in-html-emails/">http://www.viget.com/inspire/hotmail-image-problems-in-html-emails/</a></p>
<p>From here, I visited the <a href="http://www.email-standards.org/">Email Standards Project</a> which gives a good overview of mail clients and their current ability to ignore all the code you&#8217;ve been slaving over.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll leave you with a Flickr group depicting the hatred of GoogleMail&#8217;s current rendering:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/project-gmail-grimace/pool/">http://www.flickr.com/groups/project-gmail-grimace/pool/</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/Uc2xsHlXHCw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/html-emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/html-emails/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome Extensions Overview</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/5SxAHVdEgDQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-chrome-extensions-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mentioned yesterday that Google Chrome Extensions are in the here and now as opposed to a distant figure on the horizon.
You&#8217;ll need to go grab the beta of Chrome from http://www.google.com/landing/chrome/beta/ as it&#8217;s not in the release version yet, but once you do, you can play to your heart&#8217;s content.
I have a feeling that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned yesterday that Google Chrome Extensions are in the here and now as opposed to a distant figure on the horizon.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll need to go grab the beta of Chrome from <a href="http://www.google.com/landing/chrome/beta/">http://www.google.com/landing/chrome/beta/</a> as it&#8217;s not in the release version yet, but once you do, you can play to your heart&#8217;s content.</p>
<p>I have a feeling that innovation may be a little few and far between since Firefox has been out for so long, there is such a base of extensions there.  It reminds me slightly of a conversation <a href="http://twitter.com/ginatrapani">Gina Trapani</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/mattcutts">Matt Cutts</a> were having on Twitter regarding the lack of truely original apps on Android.  Almost everything has already been covered by Apple&#8217;s iPhone.</p>
<p>Chrome may also struggle as Android&#8217;s market-place has with getting the volume of content on the site in the first place as adoption by programmers may take some time.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m sure that won&#8217;t put developers or users off using Google Chrome extensions- as its still (for the time being) lightning quick.  There are already some great extensions to get started, like:</p>
<p>Speed Tracer<br />
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ognampngfcbddbfemdapefohjiobgbdl">https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ognampngfcbddbfemdapefohjiobgbdl</a></p>
<p>Chromed Bird<br />
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/encaiiljifbdbjlphpgpiimidegddhic">https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/encaiiljifbdbjlphpgpiimidegddhic</a></p>
<p>Google Wave Notifier<br />
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/aphncaagnlabkeipnbbicmcahnamibgb">https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/aphncaagnlabkeipnbbicmcahnamibgb</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/5SxAHVdEgDQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-chrome-extensions-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-chrome-extensions-overview/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome Extensions!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/hEjZ7E46MjY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-chrome-extensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently uttered the words &#8220;If Chrome supported the web developer tool bar, I&#8217;d switch from Firefox&#8221;.
Suppose it&#8217;s only a matter of time :)
https://chrome.google.com/extensions
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently uttered the words &#8220;If Chrome supported the web developer tool bar, I&#8217;d switch from Firefox&#8221;.</p>
<p>Suppose it&#8217;s only a matter of time :)</p>
<p><a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions">https://chrome.google.com/extensions</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/hEjZ7E46MjY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-chrome-extensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-chrome-extensions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Google PageRank Speed improvements</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/AXDI4wZNy1E/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-pagerank-speed-improvements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It won&#8217;t have escaped note that Google are updating their PageRank algorithm soon to take into account the speed of the web server that supplies the information.
This throws up many questions like whos going to define how quick &#8220;quick&#8221; is? &#8211; what happens if Google indexes your site which is on a shared host when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t have escaped note that Google are updating their PageRank algorithm soon to take into account the speed of the web server that supplies the information.</p>
<p>This throws up many questions like whos going to define how quick &#8220;quick&#8221; is? &#8211; what happens if Google indexes your site which is on a shared host when another site is taking a pounding?  Alot of Google&#8217;s recent announcements have all involved &#8220;speed&#8221; as a central issue, and as such, Google have released a series of tools over at <a href="http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/">http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/</a></p>
<p>Anyone wanting to know more about the algorithm hanges can check out <a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/page-load-speed-may-be-in-google-2010-algorithm/</a></p>
<p>I think we can all expect this to become a big selling point for server providers &#8211; such as UKFast who already make great play of the fact in their documentation.  Remember though, this isn&#8217;t an official announcement of intention as such &#8211; they ould still implement this in a different way if they wanted to.</p>
<p>I assume we&#8217;ll all hve to go back to text heavy sites with ascii art now.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/AXDI4wZNy1E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-pagerank-speed-improvements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/google-pagerank-speed-improvements/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Google DNS or even OpenDNS be quicker for you?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~3/zpdOe7t7vyc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/will-google-dns-or-even-opendns-be-quicker-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Radburn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noticed an article over at Smarterware &#8211; http://smarterware.org/3898/namebench-benchmarks-dns-services &#8211; which introduces &#8220;NameBench&#8221; &#8211; a service for determining whether your DNS is services are quicker or slower than alternatives.
Great thing is, this is from YOUR machine and location &#8211; not just usage statistics and speed improvements you SHOULD see by switching.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noticed an article over at Smarterware &#8211; <a href="http://smarterware.org/3898/namebench-benchmarks-dns-services">http://smarterware.org/3898/namebench-benchmarks-dns-services</a> &#8211; which introduces &#8220;NameBench&#8221; &#8211; a service for determining whether your DNS is services are quicker or slower than alternatives.</p>
<p>Great thing is, this is from YOUR machine and location &#8211; not just usage statistics and speed improvements you SHOULD see by switching.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DouglasRadburn/~4/zpdOe7t7vyc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/will-google-dns-or-even-opendns-be-quicker-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.douglasradburn.co.uk/will-google-dns-or-even-opendns-be-quicker-for-you/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
