Dre's Opinion

A New Year, A New Website

2010-01-02T05:21:00.004-04:00

Happy New Year!

It's been a nice run on blogspot, but I've decided to move my blog over to the Wordpress platform which is effective immediately. But if you still want to read my past gems don't be alarmed because those are moving also! Everything has been transferred over.

I think you will find that Wordpress is more user friendly to the eyes and easier to navigate. Another factor in my decision was the ability create separate pages(for politics, sports, and entertainment) I intend to make good use of every section. Another factor in me wanting to move to Wordpress is that anyone can comment on a post without having to register with Wordpress which can provoke nice open discussion.

The new website is http://dresopinion.wordpress.com If you were an e-mail subscriber, or subscribed to the RSS feed then you have to do so again at the top right of the page.

Dre

Sayonara Democrats (2003-2009)

2009-12-22T04:58:00.003-04:00

I figured the day would come, but not this soon. I’ve now come to the definitive conclusion that the Democratic Party and President Obama no longer represent me or my values as a progressive. When I first registered as a Democrat at the age of 18 I never would have imagined how awful this party would turn in the years after 2003.

In 2006, when the Democrats won the House and Senate everyone was rejoicing at the fact they would stand their foot down and end the Iraq War. I was never one of those people that placed full faith in them to do that given that the Democratic Party supported the Iraq War in the beginning and has funded the Iraq War ever since. With the George W. Bush Presidency in front of them with plenty of scandals and possibilities for impeachment I placed some faith that they would consider impeachment when necessary. I was misled to believe that the Democratic Party would do the right thing and hold the Bush administration accountable in areas necessary whether it was the invasion of Iraq under false pretenses, torture, poor Katrina response, or the trampling of civil liberties. The Democrats failed to hold the Bush administration accountable for any of those reasons. The problem with the Democratic Party is that they are gutless.

Instead of doing the right thing they are always worried about the next election. That was the reason given for not pursuing impeachment. Now how can you hold people accountable if you are always worried about political consequences in the next election? That’s what you call a corrupt and dysfunctional government. The reason why the Republican Party is able to accomplish their party goals is because they do what they think is right without fear. After all why should they be fearful? Democrats won’t do anything to stop them.

In November of 2006 I got a facebook invite to a student group that supported Barack Obama for President before he even formally announced his run. I decided to join to see what it was all about. A lot of people were touched by Barack Obama’s DNC speech in 2004, and supported Barack Obama on the basis that he opposed the Iraq War from the start. Those two things seemed to be the crux of 90% of the peoples support. I stayed around longer and built relationships with Obama supporters. I actually did a little organizing, and ended up watching his announcement for President with some college students. During this period of time I read literature of his positions, and frequented the facebook group discussion board to get more of a handle on Barack Obama’s various positions. I took it upon myself to research his U.S. Senate record and I saw many votes that disturbed me. His support for the renewal of the Patriot Act, his immigration policy, and his funding of the Iraq War under the guise of support for the troops were troubling enough for me that I had to sever my ties and resign from my NY grassroots position with the Barack Obama student support group. This was around March 2007, and for months ahead I was candidate free until I decided to support Dennis Kucinich for President. I agreed with him on nearly every issue so it was a perfect match.

I campaigned for Dennis Kucinich in New Hampshire and Las Vegas for a month total. Kucinich ended up dropping out the race and eventually Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were in a head-to-head battle for the Democratic nomination which he ended up winning. As much as I disagreed with Barack Obama on many issues he ran a great ground campaign. The campaign had many catchy slogans like “Change You Can Believe In” and a lot of rhetoric involving the usage of the words, “Change” and “Hope”. Not much substance in his speeches, but enough of a punch to attract support along with the potential to be the First African-American President in American history.

I debated with myself for a month or so before the election on who to vote for. I eventually decided to vote for Ralph Nader because I wasn’t in agreement with a majority of Barack Obama’s policies. Barack Obama was then elected President.

During the transition period from the time President Obama was elected to when he was sworn into office he announced many different Cabinet positions. The first sign of trouble was his decision to retain Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. Another unsettling thing was his decision to appoint Rahm Emanuel as his Chief of Staff who bears a lot of responsibility for moving the Democratic Party to the right. The last big unsettling thing was Obama’s decision to surround himself with Wall Street insiders like Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers. I didn’t like his appointment of Hillary Clinton to Secretary of State either, but it was much more tolerable than the other choices he made.

Months passed by and President Barack Obama was inaugurated to great fanfare to become the first African-American President in the nations history. While I was happy to live to see the first African-American President I had a gut feeling that a majority of the people who voted for Barack Obama didn’t know who they were voting for. But even with my great skepticism that President Barack Obama would be able to deliver any “change” I decided to give him a chance to prove it.

For someone who campaigned on his opposition to the Iraq War I found it deeply troubling that President Obama would not convene his military advisors to set up a plan that would start a withdrawal of troops from Iraq this year (2009). The common misconception of the anti-war movement is that we supposedly believe the troops can pick up and leave overnight, but that’s false. I’m aware this will take 6months + to complete, but President Obama decided to not even start that process for another year or two. I’ll believe it when I see it. But even with Obama’s campaign promise to end the Iraq War he never campaigned on the promise to “Bring the Troops Home”. He campaigned to bring the troops to Afghanistan which was the troubling aspect of that position.

In the first months of his Presidency Obama passed an “economic stimulus” bill that cost a $787 billion that was supposed to boost the economy. Well, 9months later and the economy is still in terrible shape. It also didn’t take long for President Obama to continue the use of military drones along the AfPak border which has killed countless civilians. President Obama has ordered more drone attacks in his first year than President George W. Bush ordered in his full 2 terms. Are you kidding me?

President Obama decided to use his first year to pursue healthcare reform. In the beginning it seemed to be fairly open in terms of the direction they were going, but it didn’t take long for President Obama to commit a broken promise on healthcare by negotiating a deal with big pharma privately when he had campaigned on televising negotiations on C-SPAN. President Obama and the Democratic Congress were also dead set against single-payer healthcare by refusing single-payer advocates a seat at the table when it came to discussing potential plans.

While dealing with healthcare President Obama also dealt with a couple other issues. He gave a nice fluff speech to the LGBT community promising to eventually overturn Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and the Defense of Marriage Act. I’ll believe it when I see it. The Democratic Congress did pass a hate crimes bill named after Matthew Shepard and that was considered a token for the LGBT community. But deep within that legislation was more military defense spending to fund more war. Disgusting.

Throughout the summer and fall President Obama pondered a troop increase in Afghanistan. While most of the progressives and democratic community was opposed to an escalation in Afghanistan most of them knew full well when they voted for Barack Obama that he had campaigned on escalating Afghanistan. Now there is one line of thinking that says he campaigned on escalating Afghanistan so we shouldn’t complain about it. Well, just speaking for myself that was a large reason why I couldn’t support Barack Obama. It doesn’t matter whether he promised it or not because that doesn’t justify a shitty foreign policy. But I am of the line of thinking that if people were so against a troop increase in Afghanistan then why support him for President? It doesn’t make sense.

Eventually, President Obama announced a 30,000 troop increase in Afghanistan before a carefully chosen audience that wasn’t allowed to boo him in West Point. He spewed rhetoric that if George W. Bush gave the same speech the Democratic Party would be up in arms. Instead their guy, the man with the [D] next to his name delivered it so it was considered justifiable in the eyes of some. He also promised a beginning of withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2011, but ill believe it when I see it. Even if that deadline stays it’s still a disgrace because he’s supporting more war and it will continue to increase the deficit and pound the economy into a deeper shithole than it already is. Not too long after that announcement President Obama claimed his unjustifiable Nobel Peace Prize, which should be re-named the “Anybody but Bush” prize. He was selected for the Nobel Peace Prize as a way to convince him to take a path towards peace. “Yea that really worked out well” says Afghanistan families being ravaged by his drone attacks… I couldn’t stand to watch President Barack Obama claim his prize and promote war at the same time. He was lecturing Europeans on Hitler and the necessities of war because Europeans must know nothing about Hitler and wars. Of course a “peace prize” celebration wouldn’t be complete without a performance by Toby Keith who famously does a song about Americans putting boots in people’s asses.

Now with the year of 2009 coming to a close President Obama had set a deadline that he wants healthcare reform done before January 2010. Now during this whole healthcare debate President Obama has held town halls across the country promoting this “public option” government healthcare plan that is meant to drive the costs down of health insurance companies and provide access to healthcare for millions of Americans who are uninsured. Not a terrible proposition, but in the grand scheme of things he still supports the health insurance companies and health insurance companies would still be in charge. The same broken system still stays in place. Now this “public option” scenario was tweaked and changed and eventually a weak public option passed the House of Representatives. But this didn’t happen without conceding Abortion rights for women in an amendment by Democrat Rep. Stupak and the removal of an amendment authored by Dennis Kucinich which would have allowed states to setup their own single-payer plans. This bill was largely seen as a success, but it in the end it was a big giveaway to insurance companies.

Now the healthcare debate moved to the U.S. Senate and time was running short with President Obama’s deadline to get it done before January 2010. An already weak healthcare reform plan was made weaker when the public option (that was seen as a compromise with progressives) was removed. President Obama, the man who promoted the “public option” stood by and did nothing as blue dog democrats requested and eventually had it removed from the Senate version. Then some democrats came up with a stepping stone in the right direction to expand Medicare from 55-64. Of course Senator Lieberman would have none of it and demanded it to be removed. What happened? President Obama and the Democratic leadership obliged. What a disgrace…Another big problem with the healthcare reform package is that it contains a mandate to force everyone to buy health insurance with a penalty if they don’t. This is essentially a bailout for the health insurance industry. Of course passage of the Senate version was not complete yet. The Democrats had a few more Senators to appease. They were able to buy out Senator Bernie Sanders, and even worse they continued the assault on Abortion rights by appeasing to Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska. They included a provision that would force people to not only pay a premium for health insurance, but pay an additional premium for abortion coverage. The stars were now aligned for passage of “healthcare reform” that is just a bailout for the health insurance industry and assault on abortion rights. President Obama and The Democratic Congress had no problems throwing women’s rights under the bus. So now it’s time to combine both the House bill and Senate bill for a final version and I don’t expect the so called “healthcare reform” to get better.

Now there’s an argument amongst Democrats whether to support a flawed bill to make President Obama and Democrats happy or vote against this health insurance industry bailout to get a better bill in the future. I am of course in the camp of opposing this bill on the basis of opposing mandates and assault on women’s rights.

At this time I would like to address this common attack on progressives to vote for Democratic “compromises” that is “Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good”. Well, in order to believe that statement you have to assume that the Democratic Congress views progressive policy as the “perfect” policy. Why should I believe that? The Democrats have governed to the right at LEAST since they became the majority in 2006. Progressives have been demonized by many whenever they threaten to vote against legislation because it’s not progressive enough. However, when Blue-Dog Democrats decide to hold Congress hostage to get what they want with a threatened “nay” vote it’s accepted? That’s hypocrisy. In addition to that, how many times have I heard that progressives can’t get elected to President? So what happens is that the Democratic Party nominates a centrist. Who’s in the driver’s seat here? Blue-Dog democrats are, and because of that the progressives have to fight harder.

Now as I wrap up I want to say that I didn’t go into detail on every issue President Obama has failed on. I haven’t even touched on his assault on civil liberties, the continuation of extraordinary rendition, his shitty climate change agreement in Copenhagen, or other issues. My decision to leave the Democratic Party is on the basis that President Obama and the Democratic Party have no respect for progressives. They’ve taken me for granted and assume that just because they have a [D] next to their name ill fall in line and vote for them. The ultimate deciding factor for me in leaving the Democratic Party was the continuation of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the assault on civil liberties, and the piss poor healthcare bill that is about to be passed and the process of how they arrived to the both Senate and House bills. What also played a contributing factor in my decision were the New York state level as well as the local level in New York City. A New York State government that is a big giant clusterfuck, and a New York City Council that is corrupt and led by Mayor Bloomberg serving an illegal 3^rd term that was endorsed by President Obama in his refusal to endorse the Democratic opponent. I’m aware ill no longer be able to vote in Democratic primaries, but I’m also aware that the Democratic Party has demonstrated that true progressives are not welcomed.

Recently, President Obama gave himself a grade of a B+ for his 1^st year in office. I nearly puked when I read that. What the hell has he done? The grade I would give him is a “W”. Only George W. Bush can create George W. Bush policy, but President Obama has rubber stamped Bush’s policies as his own. He’s delivered change alright…$Change$ for Wall St, $Change$ for more war, and $Change$ for health insurance companies. I’d be stunned if President Obama is re-elected for a 2^nd term because with the right candidate running in 2012 ill do my best to make sure he’s a one-termer. The day after the Democrats caved to Lieberman I registered my disgust the "official" way by going from Democrat to Independent. No longer will I be that beaten wife that keeps running back to her husband. I'm proud of myself that I had the correct foresight of not voting for this disgraceful, pro-Wall St., pro-war, anti-civil liberties President.

Sayonara Democrats,

Dre

President Obama, Democrats Love Playing the LGBT Community like a Fiddle

2009-10-13T00:50:00.004-04:00

Last Friday I watched the big speech by President Obama in front of the Human Rights Campaign [HRC], and I have to say that it was a complete failure as far as taking a next step towards gay rights. When President Obama was on the campaign trail he promised to overturn 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' and the Defense of Marriage Act, but during this speech he didn't take any steps forward. President Obama failed to offer any timelines. I would have liked to hear Obama say something like "We're working on healthcare reform now and after that issue has been completed we will work on overturning 'Don't Ask Don'l Tell', and DoMa." Didn't happen. Ok maybe that was asking too much. How about..."By the end of my first term..."? Didn't happen.

So what does the LGBT community exactly have to look forward to? Filibustering, from their 'friends' the Democrats. I get why the LGBT community has to cheer for Obama. Not because he's done squat for them, but he has the CHANCE to do something and McCain would have done nothing for them. That's all well and good, but at some point the LGBT community needs to tighten the reigns on the Democrats.

One of the many, and in my opinion insulting arguments is that the Democrats can't pursue any issues related to the LGBT rights because it will create an issue for the neocons to run wild with and possibly cause election losses for the Democratic Party. To me, that is very spineless of the Democrats. Never taking a big stand for the right issue. For the Democrats its always about the next election rather than the issues that need to be addressed. That's the reason why they didn't impeach President Bush.

So how should members of the LGBT community feel that their issue of civil rights is constantly being called a liability by a political party that's supposed to be their 'friend'? That's the question that needs to be addressed.

We know what President Obama might do, but he's done nothing yet. Right now the potential overturning of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' and DoMa should be considered a broken promise until it happens. Obama gave no new hope for the LGBT community because he just told them to keep waiting longer. Haven't they waited enough?

Dre

The Bloomberg 3rd Term Enablers Must Go on September 15th --Here's How

2009-08-27T16:25:00.007-04:00

This is a listing of all the New York City Council Members who voted to extend term limits for Mayor Bloomberg and all New York City politicians by overturning the will of the people and their primary opponents for the upcoming election on September 15th.

Several incumbents on this list are running unopposed, but don't feel obligated to vote for them. You can still protest them by leaving that race BLANK when you vote on September 15th.

City Council Speaker Christine Quinn (Manhattan) Council District 3
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Maria Passannante Derr http://www.mariaforcouncil09.com/
Yetta Kurland http://yettakurland.com/

Maria del Carmen Arroyo (Bronx) Council District 17
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Israel Martinez (looking for website)
Robert Rosado (looking for website)

Maria Baez (Bronx) Council District 14
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Yudelka Tapia http://www.yudelkatapia.com/
Fernando Cabrera http://www.fernandocabrera.us/
Kevin Ennis (looking for website)
Miguel Santana http://www.votemiguelsantana.com/miguel-santana.html

Leroy Comrie (Queens) Council District 27
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Clyde Vanel http://www.clydevanel.com
Adrienne Hayes http://adriennehayes.com/

Erik Dilan (Brooklyn) Council District 37
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Darma Diaz http://www.darmadiaz.com/

Inez Dickens (Manhattan) Council District 9
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Landon Dais http://www.landondais.com/
Carlton Berkley (searching for website)

Lewis A. Fidler (Brooklyn) Council District 46
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Alan J. Sasson http://www.sassonalanj.com/
Ayo Johnson (looking for website)
Elias Weir (looking for website)

Simcha Felder (Brooklyn) Council District 44
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
OFFICIALLY UNOPPOSED!

Helen Foster (Bronx) Council District 16
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Daryl Johnson http://www.daryl2009.com/
Carlos Sierra http://votesierra.com/
Mark Escoffery-Bey http://www.escoffery09.com/

Alan Gerson (Manhattan) Council District 1
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Margaret Chin http://www.margaretchin.com/
Pete Gleason http://www.pete2009.com/
P.J. Kim http://www.pjkim.com/
Arthur Gregory http://arthurgregory.org/

Sara Gonzalez (Brooklyn) Council District 38
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Robinson Iglesias http://www.robinson.politicalgateway.com

Robert Jackson (Manhattan) Council District 7
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Victor Bernace http://www.bernace.com/
Juan Erazo (looking for website)
Manuel Lantigua (looking for website)
Fred Masson (looking for website)
Felix Jerez http://www.myspace.com/felixjerez

G. Oliver Koppell (Bronx) Council District 11
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Tony Perez Cassino http://www.cassinoforcouncil.com/

Miguel Martinez (Manhattan) Council District 10
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Resigned due to involvement in the slush fund scandal!

Darlene Mealy (Brooklyn) Council District 41
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Tulani Kinard http://tulanikinard.com/
Tracy Boyland http://boyland09.com/
Anthony Herbert http://www.herbert4change.com/

Michael Nelson (Brooklyn) Council District 48
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Simon Belsky (looking for website)

Domenic M. Recchia, Jr. (Brooklyn) Council District 47
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
OFFICIALLY UNOPPOSED!

Diana Reyna (Brooklyn) Council District 34
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Gerald Esposito http://www.gerryesposito.com/
Gladys Santiago (looking for website)
Maritza Davila http://www.votemaritzadavila.com/

Joel Rivera (Bronx) Council District 15
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Jose Padilla Jr - (looking for website)
Oscar Zorrilla http://www.oscarzorrilla.com/

James Sanders (Queens) Council District 31
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Marquez Claxton http://marquezclaxton.com/
Jacques M Leandre http://www.votejacques.com/
Frederick A. Lewis II http://lewisforcouncil2009.com/
Michael Duncan http://michaelrduncan.com/
Lou Grays http://lougrays2009.org/

Larry Seabrook (Bronx) Council District 12
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Jerome Rice http://votejeromerice.com/
Algernon Quattlebaum http://www.algernonquattlebaum.com
Sebastian Ulanga http://sebastianulanga.com/
Johnnie Goff (looking for website)
Andy King http://andyking2009.com/
Herbert Moreira-Brown (looking for website)
Krystal Zamilla Serrano http://www.krystalserrano.com/

Helen Sears (Queens) Council District 25
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Daniel Dromm http://danieldromm.com/
Stanley Kalathara http://www.stanleykalathara.com/

Kendall Stewart (Brooklyn) Council District 45
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Sam Taitt http://www.samtaitt2009.com/
Rodrick Daley http://rdaley.com/
Earlene King (looking for website)
Dexter Mckenzie http://www.mckenzie09.com/
Jumaane Williams http://www.jumaanewilliams.com/
Godwin Williams (looking for website)

Peter Vallone Jr. (Queens) Council District 22
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
OFFICIALLY UNOPPOSED!, But consider supporting
Lynne Serpe http://www.serpeforcouncil.com/ [Green Party] on Nov. 3

James Vacca (Bronx) Council District 13
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Irene Estrada Rukaj (looking for website)

Albert Vann (Brooklyn) Council District 36
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Mark Winston Griffith http://mwgriffith.com/
David Grinage http://friendsofdavidgrinage.com/
Saquan Jones http://www.saquanjones.com/
Robert Cornegy Jr. http://www.cornegy2009.com/
Adrian Straker (looking for website)
William Carrington http://www.friendsofwilliamcarrington.com/
Tremaine Wright http://www.changewrightnow.com/

Thomas White (Queens) Council District 28
PRIMARY OPPONENT(s):
Lynn Nunes http://www.lynnnunesforcitycouncil.com/
Allan Jennings (looking for website)
Ruben Wills (looking for website)
Robert Hogan (looking for website)
Stephen Jones (looking for website)
Mireille Leroy http://www.yesweare.net/

Don't forget to vote in the primary on September 15th!

I couldn't find websites for some of the primary candidates, but if you know any of them please contact me or leave a comment.

Oscars 2009 Picks

2009-02-22T00:25:00.000-04:00

Best Picture: Slumdog Millionaire
Best Actor: Mickey Rourke "The Wrestler"
Best Actress: Melissa Leo "Frozen River"
Best Supporting Actor: Heath Ledger "The Dark Knight"
Best Supporting Actress: Viola Davis "Doubt"
Best Director: Danny Boyle "Slumdog Millionaire"
Best Original Screenplay: Courtney Hunt "Frozen River"
Best Adapted Screenplay: Simon Beaufoy "Slumdog Millionaire"
Best Animated Feature: Kung Fu Panda
Best Animated Short: Presto
Best Foreign Language Film: Waltz With Bashir
Best Art Direction: Changeling
Best Cinematography: Slumdog Millionaire
Best Costume Design: The Dutchess
Best Documentary Feature: Man on Wire
Best Documentary Short: The Witness-From the Balcony of Room 306
Best Film Editing: Slumdog Millionaire
Best Live Action Short: Spielzeugland(Toyland)
Best Make-Up: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Best Original Score: A.R. Rahman "Slumdog Millionaire"
Best Original Song: "Jai Ho", A.R. Rahman and Gulzar "Slumdog Millionaire
Best Sound Editing: Wall-E
Best Sound Mixing: Wall-E
Best Visual Effects: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

DISCLAIMER: I am not responsible for any sheckles lost! :)

My Oscar Analysis/Picks

2009-02-19T17:27:00.000-04:00

Here is my Oscar analysis for the Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor, Best Supporting Actress, Best Animated Film, and Best Original Screenplay categories.

Best Picture

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Frost/Nixon
Milk
The Reader
Slumdog Millionaire

I've seen all 5 of these movies. There are two movies nominated here that have no business being nominated; "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" and "The Reader". Benjamin Button just might be one of the most overrated movies of all time. If you were able to get through the first 30-40minutes of this movie without almost falling asleep then you deserve a prize. The only redeeming quality to this movie was Cate Blanchett and even she could not save this movie. If I as a 23-year old I could barely stay awake to see this movie then how do we expect those old Academy folks to not nod off on their rocking chairs? This movie was decent on the technical side, but as far as a total movie package this was a total snorefest.

On to the "The Reader"...I'm usually one for historical movies, but the first third of this movie was a porno and I didn't find the acting as a whole that great either. I don't know how else to describe this movie, but it just doesn't have Oscar calibur written on it. Harvey Weinstein definitely had to move his fanny to get this crap nominated.

I really enjoyed "Frost/Nixon" because of the historical significance, but it just doesn't have the total package as far as what I expect a "Best Picture" movie to have to win. Unless your into politics you probably wont enjoy it that much, and that's probably why it wont win.

"Milk" was a very good movie and very well put together. It's definitely in my top 10 of 2008. The problem with this movie is that it's an activist film, and that will ultimately be it's downfall. If "Brokeback Mountain" didn't win then this has no chance to win. I'll be shocked if it wins, but I wont be mad if it does either because it's deserving.

"Slumdog Millionaire" is the favorite to win and it should be. I would say this movie is my 2nd favorite movie of the decade behind "Lord of the Rings: Return of the King." This movie is just spectacular because it has EVERYTHING. It has drama, it has a love story, it has tragedy, and the most appealing part of this movie is the underdog/rags to riches aspect of it. Not only that, but the score is great, the cinematography is great, the film editing is great, and the directing is great. ALL those things make this movie the total package. This movie should win the Oscar, and the only movie it could lose to without uproar would be "Milk".

My pick: Slumdog Millionaire

Best Actor

Richard Jenkins "The Visitor"
Frank Langella "Frost/Nixon"
Sean Penn "Milk"
Brad Pitt "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"
Mickey Rourke "The Wrestler"

I've seen all 5 of these movies. It would be an absolute disgrace and insult to the acting industry if Brad Pitt wins. It is beyond comprehension how Pitt was able to secure this nomination, and should be win it will be one of the biggest heists in Oscar history. Richard Jenkins was good in the "The Visitor", but I think his performance was borderline as far as entering Oscar territory. I highly recommend "The Visitor" though. Frank Langella was very good as Richard Nixon even though he didn't look like him that much, but his voice and mannerisms were right on point. The Oscar nomination is well deserved, but I don't think he will win. Sean Penn was absolutely brilliant in "Milk." During the movie you forget you're even watching Sean Penn because he's completely immersed in his character as Harvey Milk. Mickey Rourke was great in the "The Wrestler", but the only knock on him that would cost him the Oscar is that he's acting himself.

I've been going back and forth on this category all week, but I'm pretty this one is going to Mickey Rourke. I think Rourke has the slight edge because the Academy tends to favor nominees who haven't won before. I do think Penn's performance was better and deserves it over Rourke, but at the end of the day I see Rourke getting the Oscar because of the great story of his career comeback.

My pick: Mickey Rourke "The Wrestler"

Best Actress

Anne Hathaway "Rachel Getting Married"
Angelina Jolie "Changeling"
Melissa Leo "Frozen River"
Meryl Streep "Doubt"
Kate Winslet "The Reader"

I've seen all 5 of these movies. This is the category where I break from the hype. I thought Anne Hathaway was pretty good, but borderline as far as Oscar territory is concerned. Her performance was similar to Ellen Page last year in "Juno". Good, but not good enough to win. I thought Angelina Jolie was pretty good, and if she hadn't won an Oscar before I would say she would be a top contender to win. There is a little element of phoniness to her acting that is sometimes evident. I thought Melissa Leo was absolutely brilliant in "Frozen River". She carried the whole movie on her shoulders and her character was very likeable. I thought Meryl Streep was good, but not great in "Doubt". Don't get me wrong Meryl Streep is a great actress, but to me her performance did not rise to that next level where Daniel-Day Lewis was last year with "There Will Be Blood." As far as Kate Winslet goes I am stunned that she is getting all this praise for her performance in "The Reader". She was fairly ordinary to me and when her character gets older in the movie her hair turns grey but the acting stays the same as when she was young.

This is the category that is very hard to predict. I did not think any one performance was head and shoulders above the rest. I don't buy into the Meryl Streep vs Kate Winslet battle because I don't think either deserve the Oscar this year. I know I am in the extreme minority, but I am also in good company with Roger Ebert who believe that Melissa Leo deserves the Oscar. The safe pick is Kate Winslet, but I'm gonna be naive and assume the Academy voters watched "Frozen River." Based on all the performances I believe Melissa Leo was the best and she carried the movie better than the rest of the nominees. Melissa Leo for the upset.

My pick: Melissa Leo "Frozen River"

Best Supporting Actor

Josh Brolin "Milk"
Robert Downey Jr. "Tropic Thunder"
Philip Seymour Hoffman "Doubt"
Heath Ledger "The Dark Knight"
Michael Shannon "Revolutionary Road"

The only movie I haven't seen here yet is "Revolutionary Road." Let's be honest we know who's gonna win this, but I'm gonna break it down anyway. Josh Brolin in "Milk" was good, but honestly he should have been nominated for his performance as President George W. Bush in "W.". I do think his performance in "Milk" is very borderline Oscar material, but I guess this is a consolation for not getting the "W." nomination. Robert Downey Jr. was absolutely great in "Tropic Thunder", and if there is a shred of hope for an upset it is him. Philip Seymour Hoffman was kind of ordinary, and I'm a little puzzled why he was nominated. I don't think his performance was Oscar materiall, but I guess that's name recognition doing it's trick. I can't speak for Michael Shannon because I haven't seen it yet (although I might by Sunday). Heath Ledger was absolutely brilliant in "The Dark Knight". He completely immersed himself into the character of the joker, and he totally deserves the Oscar dead or alive.

My pick: Heath Ledger "The Dark Knight"

Best Supporting Actress

Amy Adams "Doubt"
Penelope Cruz "Vicky Cristina Barcelona"
Viola Davis "Doubt"
Taraji P. Henson "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"
Marisa Tomei "The Wrestler"

I've seen all 4 of these movies. This is probably the toughest category to predict. I liked Amy Adams in "Doubt", but I thought the performance was fairly ordinary and borderline Oscar material. I didn't think Penelope Cruz was bad, but her performance was almost like watching a whining lady and was fairly borderline Oscar material. Viola Davis was only in "Doubt" for 10minutes/2 scenes, but she was great. Taraji P. Henson wasn't terrible, but I thought her acting was more phoniness than authenticity. Marisa Tomei was very good in "The Wrestler", but she probably wont win because she has already won before and is not very well liked.

This one is pretty tough, but I'm going with Viola Davis. The reason why Viola Davis deserves the Oscar is that her 2nd scene in "Doubt" with Meryl Streep walking through the park is probably one of the best scenes of 2008. Not only that, but that scene in the park added so much to "Doubt" that if it was taken away it would caused the movie to lose a lot of steam.

My pick: Viola Davis "Doubt"

Best Animated Feature Film

Bolt
Kung Fu Panda
Wall-E

I've only seen Kung Fu Panda and Wall-E. I can't speak for "Bolt" because I haven't seen it. I thought Kung Fu Panda was pretty good. This was a well put together movie that has a lot of replay value. I thought the animation was good and the story was good also. It had this Yoda/Splinter like character which can't be a bad thing. It had it's fair share of kid jokes, but they all came off well. For all the hoopla surrounding "Wall-E" I thought it would better. The robot animation was good, the emotions of the robot were good, and the sounds were excellent. As far as a total package I thought "Wall-E" fell short. The plot was scrappy at times and the humans element brought down the movie for me. I thought the first 30-40minutes of the movie were great, but it went downhill from there. Most people will pick "Wall-E", but Kung Fu Panda swept the Annie awards(Animation awards), and given the fact that I myself see Kung Fu Panda as a better overall movie I am going with Kung Fu Panda.

My pick: Kung Fu Panda

Best Original Screenplay

"Frozen River" Courtney Hunt
"Happy Go-Lucky" Michael Leigh
"In Bruges" Martin McDonagh
"Milk" Dustin Lance Black
"Wall-E" Screenplay by Andrew Stanton, Jim Reardon
Story by Andrew Stanton, Pete Docter

I've seen all 5 of these movies. For me this is a very tough category to predict even though "Milk" is the favorite because it's a Best Picture nominee. I thought "Frozen River" was a very well written movie. The plot was flawless, and the dialogue was great. I enjoyed "Happy Go-Lucky" as a movie, but I thought the plot was a little sketchy. It had great dialogue. "In Bruges" was a great movie, and the plot was good and the dialogue was good. I thought "Milk" was a good movie, but I didn't think the strength of the movie was in the dialogue. I can't give it to "Wall-E" because there was very little dialogue in the movie, and I thought the plot itself was a little sketchy at times.

Everyone will say "Milk" will win because it's nominated for Best Picture, but I disagree. "In Bruges" is probably the 2nd best safe pick in this category because it had a good plot, good dialogue, and is not represented anywhere else in the Oscars. I will again be in the extreme minority and pick "Frozen River" because I believe it had the purest dialogue and an absolutely completely flawless plot.

My pick: "Frozen River" Courtney Hunt

I will pick the rest of the categories on Saturday night!

Disclaimer: I am not responsible for any sheckles lost by any readers. Trust at your own risk :)

My Inauguration and Obama Presidency Thoughts

2009-01-22T03:39:00.015-04:00

Even as someone who didn't vote for Barack Obama this inauguration ceremony was a must watch for obvious reasons. It only happens every 4/8 years, and most of all Barack Obama is the first African-American President in U.S. History. But I have to admit the reason why I enjoyed this ceremony most was not because of President Barack Obama, but because of George W. Bush.

Bush

To me Bush leaving office was more significant than Obama becoming President primarily because I believe (and others also) that he posed the most danger to the world. But of course there was a bittersweetness to that. I'm still not that happy that Bush was able to leave office in the fashion that he did. He was able to valiantly be escorted to a helicopter by Barack and Michelle Obama when he really should have been impeached and removed from office a whole lot sooner.

Regardless of how Bush left the presidency it meant the era of the worst President in U.S. history was over... which was really 1/3 of my life. This may not bear much significance to the older generations, but for people in my generation this is big. This was the era that introduced to me the art of protesting. While I'm proud that my courage to protest grew on me during the last 8 years it was done under circumstances that should have never happened. If there was anything mildly positive about Bush's presidency that I can think of it was that. As I was watching the inauguration ceremony I heard commentators talk about how they believe George W. Bush's presidency will be viewed in a more positive light in the future like other former presidents, but I honestly don't think so. Because of all the times Bush has gotten away with crimes watching him fly away in the helicopter was a "see it to believe it" moment for me.

President Obama

Watching President Obama get inaugurated was a nice thing to see because of the historical nature surrounding it with him being the first African-American President in U.S. history, but I had mixed feelings about the whole day and the coverage. I thought it was a very well done ceremony. The camera shot over the National Mall was great to see the millions of people there for such a historical moment. I didn't think President Obama's speech was as good as some of his previous speeches but I liked his "New Era of Responsibility" message when he was said:

What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility — a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.

This to me was the most significant message in his speech. I know millions of people listened to the speech, but I am not convinced that many people will follow through on that. We'll have to see...

Where I had problems with the ceremony was the overall tone of the coverage of the ceremony as well as crowd opinion. Not to diminish such a historical moment, but I think I was able to figure out that President Obama was the first African-American president after the 1,635,565th time of it being mentioned. Furthermore, based on crowd reaction interviews it confirmed to me what I suspected all along that voting for the first African-American President was more of a determining factor for their vote than the issues which I can't support at all. People were saying things like "I couldn't pass up the opportunity to vote for the first African-American president."I'm a firm believer that votes should never be based on race, gender, religion, or ethnicity whether you are for or against. It's just not right. It should be issues first and then if that candidate happens to be the first African-American President then great. Not the other way around. Many people will say that Obama being African-American was more of a negative than a beneficiary during the election, but I believe the latter.

The coverage itself was very over the top particularly during the limo ride down Pennsylvania Avenue when Obama kept going in and out. "WHEN IS PRESIDENT OBAMA GOING TO GET OUT OF THE LIMO?!"...Hold on a second I have to turn down the volume on my T.V. Keith Olbermann just had another O-gasm... A little much. And then of course the nonstop news coverage of the Presidential balls. It's good to know that the world stopped for President Obama.

I guess to sum up everything in a nutshell I thought race was played up way too much to the point where it was sickening.

As I said in my previous posting I don't regret not voting for President Obama, but I believe those who didn't vote for him should give Obama a chance to prove himself. That being said, he's already done a few things that I don't like; appointing Rahm Emanuel as Chief of Staff and Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. Rahm Emanuel makes my skin crawl, but appointing Hillary as Secretary of State is the most puzzling asinine decision Obama has made so far. Remember Obamamaniacs, any diplomatic screw up by Hillary is on Obama's watch. Plus after all the "one President at a time" excuses by now President Obama I'm still waiting for his forceful stance on the Israel/Palestine conflict. **crickets**

President Obama has done some good things so far though like ending torture and closing Guantanamo Bay. I have to give him credit for that.

In conclusion I will say that I'm not euphoric about Obama being President, but I'm glad it's not McCain. After watching the inauguration ceremony I'm just not sure that I believe many Obama supporters will be fair and objective about his Presidency. Will they criticize him when he screws up? I'm not sure, but what I can say is that I expect some 'buyers remorse'. For those that expect President Obama to govern from the far left you will very disappointed. For those supporters that knew he was a moderate (and in my opinion on the conservative side) you voted for him for the right reasons and you will probably see what you expected. It's really hard to detect what Obama supporters expect out of President Obama when they expect non-substantive things like "Hope" and "Change", but I guess that question will be answered in 4 years.

That's all I have to say about this subject right now. I hope President Obama proves me wrong, but so far he hasn't done anything that I didn't expect to happen.

Dre

Superbowl XLIII Prediction

2009-01-03T03:24:00.001-04:00

After 17 weeks of continuous football picks w/ spread I ended up batting .515 (132/256).

Let's see how I did with my pre-season playoff predictions...

NFC EAST - COWBOYS
NFC NORTH - LIONS
NFC SOUTH - SAINTS
NFC WEST - SEAHAWKS
WILDCARD - GIANTS, EAGLES

AFC EAST - PATRIOTS
AFC NORTH - BROWNS
AFC SOUTH - COLTS
AFC WEST - CHARGERS
WILDCARD - STEELERS, JAGUARS

Superbowl Prediction
COWBOYS vs BROWNS

Superbowl Winner: COWBOYS

As you can you see I did pretty bad in my pre-season playoff predictions. Some I got half right, but the wrong slot. I thought the Browns were going to be a top contender with the acquisitions they made in the offseason with Derek Anderson at QB. They fell flat....The Cowboys fell flat also. (And boy was I wrong picking the Lions to win the NFC North)
------------------------------------

Rather than picking the playoff games week to week I'm just going to make this a little harder and give my Superbowl pick with the teams in the playoffs....

NFC - As much as it pains me to say this it seems that Philly teams are getting a lot of breaks this year. The Eagles are now playing solid football and seems like all the "Get rid of Andy Reid/McNabb" talk has gone away. The Eagles will soar all the way to the Superbowl and in the process knock off the New York Giants. Giants fans will realize the hard way that Domenik Hixon is no Plaxico Burress on the football field.

AFC - The AFC seems to be much more competitive, but I see the Baltimore Ravens as the dark horse this year. The Ravens defense is great, and Ed Reed is having a great year along with rookie QB Joe Flacco. All year long I have told myself "The Steelers are overrated", but for some reason they just kept winning games. I see the Baltimore Ravens going through Pittsburgh and edging out a "Big Ben Concussioned" Pittsburgh Steeler team in a tough defensive battle to make it to the Superbowl.

Superbowl - So there I have the stage set for an Eagles/Ravens Superbowl. As many New York Giants fans will remember there was a point when they wanted to run coach Tom Coughlin and Eli Manning out of town...until they turned it around. I believe we will see a similar situation with the Eagles. Most of the time it's "defense wins championships", but I believe this time it will be Veteran vs Rookie QB. McNabb has been to the Superbowl before, but Flacco hasn't. I see Flacco wilting under pressure and Brian Westbrook running through the Ravens defense like the New York Giants did in the regular season. In the end McNabb will remember that Superbowls don't end in a tie and play the game of his life sending the Eagles to a Superbowl victory.

Superbowl XLIII Champions: Philadelphia Eagles

NFL 2008 Week 17 Picks

2008-12-26T13:37:00.001-04:00

It's been a very wild NFL season with many twists and turns! Down to the final Week....

My picks have been decent for most the season. I need 6 picks right to clinch a .500 record.

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Falcons vs Rams 14.5
RAMS
Patriots vs Bills 6.5
PATRIOTS
Bengals vs Chiefs 3.0
BENGALS
Packers vs Lions 9.5
PACKERS
Titans vs Colts 3.0
TITANS
Vikings vs Giants 6.5
GIANTS
Panthers vs Saints 3.0
PANTHERS
Steelers vs Browns 10.5
STEELERS
Buccaneers vs Raiders 13.0
BUCCANEERS
Texans vs Bears 2.5
TEXANS
Jets vs Dolphins 3.0
DOLPHINS
Eagles vs Cowboys 1.5
COWBOYS
Cardinals vs Seahawks 6.0
CARDINALS
49ers vs Redskins 3.0
REDSKINS
Ravens vs Jaguars 12.5
RAVENS
Chargers vs Broncos 8.0
BRONCOS

10/16

CORRECT WRONG PUSH

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14
Week 8: 6/14
Week 9: 6/14
Week 10: 8/14
Week 11: 11/16
Week 12: 10/16
Week 13: 9/16
Week 14: 10/16
Week 15: 7/16
Week 16: 8/16

NFL 2008 Week 16 Picks

2008-12-18T18:25:00.001-04:00

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Colts vs Jaguars 6.0
COLTS
Cowboys vs Ravens 4.0
COWBOYS
Browns vs Bengals 3.0
BENGALS
Saints vs Lions 7.0
SAINTS
Steelers vs Titans 2.0
STEELERS
Dolphins vs Chiefs 4.0
DOLPHINS
49ers vs Rams 5.5
49ERS
Patriots vs Cardinals 7.5
PATRIOTS
Buccaneers vs Chargers 3.5
CHARGERS
Broncos vs Bills 7.0
BRONCOS
Texans vs Raiders 7.0
TEXANS
Jets vs Seahawks 4.5
SEAHAWKS
Vikings vs Falcons 3.5
FALCONS
Eagles vs Redskins 5.0
EAGLES
Giants vs Panthers 3.0
PANTHERS
Bears vs Packers 4.0
BEARS

8/16

CORRECT WRONG

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14
Week 8: 6/14
Week 9: 6/14
Week 10: 8/14
Week 11: 11/16
Week 12: 10/16
Week 13: 9/16
Week 14: 10/16
Week 15: 7/16

NFL 2008 Week 15 Picks

2008-12-11T07:30:00.001-04:00

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Bears vs Saints 3.0
BEARS
Falcons vs Buccaneers 3.0
FALCONS
Redskins vs Bengals 7.0
REDSKINS
Colts vs Lions 17.0
COLTS
Chargers vs Chiefs 5.0
CHARGERS
Rams vs Seahawks Off(0)
SEAHAWKS
Dolphins vs 49ers 6.5
DOLPHINS
Jets vs Bills 7.0
JETS
Packers vs Jaguars 2.5
JAGUARS
Titans vs Texans 3.0
TITANS
Cardinals vs Vikings Off(0)
CARDINALS
Patriots vs Raiders Off(0)
PATRIOTS
Panthers vs Broncos 7.5
PANTHERS
Ravens vs Steelers 2.0
STEELERS
Cowboys vs Giants 3.0
COWBOYS
Eagles vs Browns 14.0
EAGLES

7/16

CORRECT WRONG PUSH

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14
Week 8: 6/14
Week 9: 6/14
Week 10: 8/14
Week 11: 11/16
Week 12: 10/16
Week 13: 9/16
Week 14: 10/16

NFL 2008 Week 14 Picks

2008-12-04T16:55:00.011-04:00

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Chargers vs Raiders 9.5
CHARGERS
Bears vs Jaguars 6.5
BEARS
Vikings vs Lions Off(0)
VIKINGS
Packers vs Texans 5.5
TEXANS
Titans vs Browns 13.5
BROWNS
Colts vs Bengals 13.5
COLTS
Saints vs Falcons 3.0
FALCONS
Giants vs Eagles 7.0
EAGLES
Bills vs Dolphins 1.0
DOLPHINS
Broncos vs Chiefs 9.0
BRONCOS
Jets vs 49ers 4.0
JETS
Patriots vs Seahawks 4.5
PATRIOTS
Cardinals vs Rams 14.0
CARDINALS
Steelers vs Cowboys 3.0
COWBOYS
Ravens vs Redskins 5.0
RAVENS
Panthers vs Buccaneers 3.0
PANTHERS

10/16

CORRECT WRONG

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14
Week 8: 6/14
Week 9: 6/14
Week 10: 8/14
Week 11: 11/16
Week 12: 10/16
Week 13: 9/16

The Reaction to Plaxico Burress Is Overblown

2008-12-02T07:31:00.001-04:00

I think I've seen and heard enough coverage about Plaxico Burress accidentally shooting himself in the leg in a nightclub with an illegally possessed gun to establish that Plaxico Burress is an idiot. That's a given. My problem is the reaction to this that he should be jailed for a long period of time.

Many New Yorkers may or may not remember that New York had weak gun laws, and that since Mayor Bloomberg has been in power he's been on a gun control crusade. In 2006 Mayor Bloomberg made criminal possession of a weapon a mandatory 3.5 year sentence. Is 3.5 years really necessary? I'm sure any illegal possessing gun owner(Plaxico Burress now included) realized their stupid mistake as soon as they got caught and the cuffs were put on their wrists. What is the exact purpose to put someone in jail for 3.5 years for just OWNING an illegal gun? Remember owning/possessing a gun does not mean he shot anybody.

I've heard a lot of talk about what could have been and a lot of "what ifs", but you can't punish anybody for a hypothetical situation. Yea Plaxico Burress was drinking at the club, and he COULD HAVE shot and killed somebody else...........but he didn't. And there was a time that I was angry and pissed at a family member that I COULD HAVE punched them in the face, but I didn't. Please let's be smart and only talk about what actually happened. Of course there is very little coverage about the fact that the club let Plaxico Burress in with a gun because he was a celebrity. The club doesn't take a significant part of the blame in this situation also? The club knowingly put the people in the club in danger.

Yesterday Mayor Bloomberg managed to shove his egotistical self in the headlines saying:

"It would be an outrage if we don't prosecute to the fullest extent of the law."

Hey Mayor Bloomberg, I understand you want to be the King of New York and King of gun control, but you shouldn't be holding press conferences about putting individuals in jail. That being said, I agree that everyone should be punished equally. I just don't think 3.5 years in prison is the right answer for this crime. There are more serious crimes where people hurt another person and they actually serve less. To me this gun control law is a minor version of the War on Drugs. I do agree that offenders should serve some jail time, but 3.5 years mandatory minimum is really excessive and in my opinion a waste of tax dollars regardless who it is.

In the end I do believe Plaxico Burress will end up serving time in jail. Mayor Bloomberg will be putting a lot of pressure to make sure Plaxico serves time because what better thing on Bloomberg's record would there be than to have a high valued celebrity figure become a poster boy to his gun law?

Happy Thanksgiving!!

2008-11-27T07:30:00.004-04:00

I want to wish a Happy Thanksgiving to my readers!

Of all the holidays I would say Thanksgiving is one that is very low on my totem pole in terms of relevance. Shouldn't we be thankful everyday and not just one day out of the whole year? The main problem with the holiday is that it emphasizes 1 day thankfulness and a ton of food consumption.

Thanksgiving is probably the one holiday that is "ultra American", and also portrays America in a negative light.

NFL 2008 Week 13 Picks

2008-11-27T03:13:00.011-04:00

I had another lucky double digit week last week. Let's see if I can keep it up...This week is kind of tough.

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Titans vs Lions 11.0
TITANS
Cowboys vs Seahawks 12.5
COWBOYS
Eagles vs Cardinals 3.0
CARDINALS
Bills vs 49ers 7.0
BILLS
Ravens vs Bengals 7.0
RAVENS
Colts vs Browns 4.5
COLTS
Packers vs Panthers 3.0
PANTHERS
Rams vs Dolphins Off(0)
DOLPHINS
Buccaneers vs Saints 3.5
BUCCANEERS
Giants vs Redskins 3.5
GIANTS
Chargers vs Falcons 5.0
FALCONS
Raiders vs Chiefs 3.0
CHIEFS
Patriots vs Steelers 1.0
PATRIOTS
Jets vs Broncos 7.5
JETS
Vikings vs Bears 3.0
BEARS
Texans vs Jaguars 3.0
TEXANS

9/16

CORRECT WRONG

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14
Week 8: 6/14
Week 9: 6/14
Week 10: 8/14
Week 11: 11/16
Week 12: 10/16

NFL 2008 Week 12 Picks

2008-11-20T01:50:00.007-04:00

Wow I was really lucky last week. I happened to be a victim of the Steelers/Chargers debacle last week with my pick, but luckily no money was at stake for me!

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Steelers vs Bengals 10.5
BENGALS
Browns vs Texans 3.0
TEXANS
Cowboys vs 49ers 10.0
COWBOYS
Buccaneers vs Lions 8.5
BUCCANEERS
Titans vs Jets 5.5
JETS
Bills vs Chiefs 3.0
BILLS
Bears vs Rams 8.5
BEARS
Dolphins vs Patriots 1.5
PATRIOTS
Jaguars vs Vikings 2.5
JAGUARS
Ravens vs Eagles 1.0
EAGLES
Broncos vs Raiders 9.5
BRONCOS
Falcons vs Panthers 1.0
PANTHERS
Giants vs Cardinals 3.0
GIANTS
Redskins vs Seahawks 3.5
REDSKINS
Chargers vs Colts 3.0
COLTS
Saints vs Packers 2.5
SAINTS

10/16

CORRECT WRONG

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14
Week 8: 6/14
Week 9: 6/14
Week 10: 8/14
Week 11: 11/16

An Ignorant Rant By Kos Against Nader and Supporters

2008-11-16T01:53:00.001-04:00

I'm not a big fan of the popular so called "progressive" (even though it's not) website called DailyKos, but every now and then I just check in to read some stories just to kill time. Today the founder of the site Markos Moulitsas made a mockery post about Nader:

2008: 695,446 (0.5%)
2004: 465,650 (0.38%)
2000: 2,882,955 (2.7%)

The good news (for him), Nader increased his showing from 2004. The bad news (for him), like in 2004, he's still irrelevant (as are his supporters). The worst news, too bad he wasn't irrelevant in 2000. Yet through it all, Nader's ego never fails to amaze.

We believe history will treat the Nader/Gonzalez initiative kindly in part because its reading of the necessities of the American people was accurate as was its condemnation of the concentrated powers that have for so long denied them livelihoods of decency, security and voice.

I doubt "history" gives a rats ass about the "Nader/Gonzalez initiative" (they used to be called "campaigns"), and after I hit submit "post" on this little piece, neither will I.

I did not have a big problem with this, but certain questions did come into my head.
A) Why is Markos bringing up Nader if Nader is "irrelevant"?
B) If Markos dislikes Nader so much what is he doing on the Nader website?

So after about a couple hours I decided to check back at this post to read some more comments about Nader and I discovered this post by Markos:

I recently mocked Nader and his supporters, and claimed that would be the last I'd think of him. But then I got a bunch of whines like this one in my inbox:
I'll go ahead and disclose that I voted for Nader this election cycle. I felt that Obama did not do an adequate job to reach out to progressives, a point to which I have no doubt we deeply disagree.

Nader certainly deserved heavy criticism for his disgusting Uncle Tom remark. I have no qualms for the Kos treatment of him on that issue. However, today I read a post that labeled me "irrelevant." You are more than welcome to criticize Nader, his policies, and his methodology; however, to disparage the hundreds of thousands of people who voted for him and the hundreds of thousands more who would have if not for fear of the false choice of the two-party system is uncalled for.

It is for this reason that I will no longer read the Daily Kos. If the Kos were to issue a retraction or apology, I would quickly reconsider my decision, as the Kos is one of my favorite sites to visit.

Ha ha, yeah, that won't happen. Anyone who sails with the Nader crowd deserves nothing more than ridicule.

Fuck Ralph Nader, and fuck his supporters. If the past eight years hasn't smacked any sense into their addled brains, then nothing will. This site caters to the reality-based community. No one else need apply.

I guess Markos didn't get the "unity memo" from Barack Obama..."Fuck Ralph Nader, and fuck his supporters"? I let the first diary slide as a desperate diary because it was a slow news day, but this was uncalled for. I guess this is supposed to convince me to vote Democrat in 2012...Ha ha ha Diaries like this piece of garbage by Markos are exact reasons why the DailyKos community can't be taken seriously.

I'm just amazed that Ralph Nader is a topic of discussion by Markos after Barack Obama just kicked John McCain's ass to become the 44th President of the United States.

No more analysis of this garbage post.

NFL Week 11 Picks

2008-11-13T01:38:00.001-04:00

Gotta get picks in early from now on. That damn NFL Network and their Thursday games....

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Patriots vs Jets 3.0
JETS
Falcons vs Broncos 6.0
FALCONS
Eagles vs Bengals 9.0
EAGLES
Packers vs Bears Off(0)
PACKERS
Colts vs Texans 8.0
TEXANS
Saints vs Chiefs 5.5
SAINTS
Dolphins vs Raiders 10.5
DOLPHINS
Giants vs Ravens 6.5
GIANTS
Buccaneers vs Vikings 3.5
BUCCANEERS
Panthers vs Lions 14.0
LIONS
49ers vs Rams 6.5
49ERS
Cardinals vs Seahawks 3.0
CARDINALS
Steelers vs Chargers 4.5
STEELERS
Titans vs Jaguars 3.0
TITANS
Cowboys vs Redskins 1.5
REDSKINS
Bills vs Browns 5.0
BROWNS

11/16

CORRECT WRONG

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14
Week 8: 6/14
Week 9: 6/14
Week 10: 8/14

Let's Give Barack Obama a Chance

2008-11-10T02:43:00.001-04:00

Now that Barack Obama has been elected the 44th President of the United States and the first African-American president I think it's fair that we give him a chance to prove himself.

Any conservative/Republican that may be reading this post I'm talking to you! As someone who frequents Facebook I was surprised find out that an "Impeach Obama" was created within a day of Obama winning the Presidency. I was even more surprised to see the group had 4,000 members at the time, and now it's almost at 7,000. I think this is decent enough evidence that proves that Republicans are clueless about impeachment. They were clueless about proper grounds for impeachment in the late 90s with Bill Clinton, and they still haven't learned 10 years later. Can Barack Obama be President for at least 1 day before these ridiculous "Impeach Obama" groups start popping up? I guess that's too much to ask from divisive mud-slinging Republicans.

As for myself, I take no shame in voting for Ralph Nader, but I will give Barack Obama a chance to prove himself. That being said, I hope he gets criticized when he deserves to be criticized. I'll be curious to see what barometer Democrats will use to criticize his presidency. Will George W. Bush be the low bar and Bill Clinton be the high bar?

Barack Obama will have four years to deliver with a near filibuster proof Congress. Should he fail to uphold his promise of "Change" there is no doubt in my mind that he will be a 1 term President. Let's see what he can do.

Dre

NFL Week 10 Picks

2008-11-09T07:35:00.003-04:00

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Browns vs Broncos 3.0
BROWNS
Falcons vs Saints 1.0
FALCONS
Titans vs Bears 3.0
TITANS
Jaguars vs Lions 6.5
LIONS
Dolphins vs Seahawks 8.5
DOLPHINS
Vikings vs Packers 2.5
PACKERS
Patriots vs Bills 3.5
PACKERS
Jets vs Rams 8.0
JETS
Ravens vs Texans 1.0
RAVENS
Panthers vs Raiders 9.0
PANTHERS
Steelers vs Colts Off(0)
STEELERS
Chargers vs Chiefs 15.0
CHIEFS
Eagles vs Giants 3.0
EAGLES
Cardinals vs 49ers 9.5
CARDINALS

8/14

CORRECT WRONG

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14
Week 8: 6/14
Week 9: 6/14

NFL Week 9 Picks

2008-11-02T07:15:00.001-04:00

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Bills vs Jets 5.5
BILLS
Bears vs Lions 12.5
LIONS
Jaguars vs Bengals 7.5
JAGUARS
Browns vs Ravens 1.5
RAVENS
Titans vs Packers 5.5
TITANS
Buccaneers vs Chiefs 8.5
BUCCANEERS
Cardinals vs Rams 3.0
RAMS
Vikings vs Texans 4.5
TEXANS
Broncos vs Dolphins 3.5
BRONCOS
Falcons vs Raiders 3.0
FALCONS
Giants vs Cowboys 9.0
COWBOYS
Eagles vs Seahawks 6.5
EAGLES
Colts vs Patriots 6.0
PATRIOTS
Redskins vs Steelers 2.0
STEELERS

6/14

CORRECT WRONG

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14
Week 8: 6/14

NFL Week 8 Picks

2008-10-26T07:15:00.001-04:00

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Cowboys vs Buccaneers 2.5
BUCCANEERS
Redskins vs Lions 7.5
REDSKINS
Bills vs Dolphins 1.5
BILLS
Patriots vs Rams 7.0
RAMS
Chargers vs Saints 3.0
CHARGERS
Jets vs Chiefs 13.0
JETS
Eagles vs Falcons 9.0
FALCONS
Panthers vs Cardinals 4.0
PANTHERS
Ravens vs Raiders 7.0
RAVENS
Jaguars vs Browns 7.0
BROWNS
Texans vs Bengals 9.5
TEXANS
Steelers vs Giants 3.0
GIANTS
49ers vs Seahawks 5.0
49ERS
Titans vs Colts 4.0
TITANS

6/14

CORRECT WRONG PUSH

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14
Week 7: 6/14

Democracy Successfully Attacked in New York

2008-10-24T16:38:00.001-04:00

Yesterday the New York City Council approved Mayor Bloomberg's proposal to extend term limits without a voter referendum even though a voter referendum to keep term limits at 2 terms was passed in 1993 and 1996. The final vote was 29-22.

I hope the result of the vote is not forgotten by New York City voters, and voters around the country. This vote has set a terrible precedent for states around the country. All 29 of the people that voted for this undemocratic measure should be voted out of office in 2009 to send a clear message that turning your backs on democracy is unforgivable. The 29 snakes against democracy are:

Maria del Carmen Arroyo (Bronx)
Maria Baez (Bronx)
Leroy Comrie (Queens)
Erik Dilan (Brooklyn)
Inez Dickens (Manhattan)
Lewis A. Fidler (Brooklyn)
Simcha Felder (Brooklyn)
Helen Foster (Bronx)
Alan Gerson (Manhattan)
Sara Gonzalez (Brooklyn)
Robert Jackson (Manhattan)
Melinda Katz (Queens)
G. Oliver Koppell (Bronx)
Miguel Martinez (Manhattan)
Darlene Mealy (Brooklyn)
Michael Nelson (Brooklyn)
Christine Quinn (Manhattan)
Domenic M. Recchia, Jr. (Brooklyn)
Diana Reyna (Brooklyn)
Joel Rivera (Bronx)
James Sanders (Queens)
Larry Seabrook (Bronx)
Helen Sears (Queens)
Kendall Stewart (Brooklyn)
Peter Vallone Jr. (Queens)
James Vacca (Bronx)
Albert Vann (Brooklyn)
Thomas White (Queens)
David Yassky (Brooklyn)

Once I find out primary opponents for each district I will put it on my blog. I encourage everyone to help fund primary opponents to the above council members for overturning the will of the people. This attack on democracy should not be tolerated and every single one of them should be held accountable.

I will be covering this issue extensively in the future on my blog.

Dre

Democracy in Serious Danger in New York

2008-10-21T16:28:00.014-04:00

Democracy is in serious danger in New York because Mayor Bloomberg is trying to overturn the will of the people by extending term limits without a vote by the people. Referendums were passed to keep term limits at 2 terms in 1993 and 1996.

The Mayor contends that a majority of New Yorkers support the extension of term limits through the City Council, but this Quinnipiac poll says otherwise:

By an 89 - 7 percent margin, New York City voters say the issue of term limits should be decided by voters in a referendum, not by an act of the City Council. Even Republican voters prefer a referendum 85 - 11 percent.

Today it was made clear Mayor Bloomberg's true intentions from the start. According this NY1 article:

Mayor Michael Bloomberg said that if the council votes down the legislation, he will not push to have it overruled by a voter referendum, despite a new poll out today showing the New Yorkers overwhelmingly want to have a say in the matter.

This is clear evidence that Mayor Bloomberg intended from the start to go around a voter referendum by having the City Council overturn the will of the people. If Mayor Bloomberg is that serious about extending term limits and really truly believes he is the only New Yorker capable of fixing the financial crisis wouldn't it make sense that the Mayor support a voter referendum?

A vote for the Mayor's proposal is set for Thursday. The current count FOR the proposal is 18 and the count AGAINST is currently 23. [UPDATED Oct. 23 9:05pm]

The 10 City Council members that remain undecided are:

Maria del Carmen Arroyo (D) Bronx
Gale Brewer (D) Manhattan
Inez Dickens (D) Manhattan
Simcha Felder (D) Brooklyn
Helen Foster (D) Bronx
Alan Gerson (D) Manhattan
Melinda Katz (D) Queens
James Sanders (D) Queens
Tom White (D) Queens
David Yassky (D) Brooklyn

Please call or email these council members stating your opposition to the Mayor's proposal on grounds of democracy. This is not about whether you like Bloomberg or not. It's about democracy.

Even if you live outside of New York passage of this proposal will set a terrible precedent.

NFL Week 7 Picks

2008-10-19T07:15:00.002-04:00

Last week I had a great week let's hope I can keep it up. Luck seems to be on my side right now...

Favorite vs Underdog bold=Home team
My pick

Bills vs Chargers 1.0
CHARGERS
Bears vs Vikings 3.0
BEARS
Steelers vs Bengals 9.5
STEELERS
Titans vs Chiefs 8.0
TITANS
Cowboys vs Rams Off(0)
COWBOYS
Dolphins vs Ravens 3.0
DOLPHINS
Giants vs 49ers 10.5
49ers
Panthers vs Saints 3.0
PANTHERS
Texans vs Lions 9.5
LIONS
Colts vs Packers 1.0
COLTS
Jets vs Raiders 3.0
JETS
Redskins vs Browns 7.5
BROWNS
Buccaneers vs Seahawks 10.5
BUCCANEERS
Patriots vs Broncos 3.0
BRONCOS

CORRECT WRONG

6/14

Past Results
Week 1: 8/16
Week 2: 7/14
Week 3: 5/16
Week 4: 4/13
Week 5: 8/14
Week 6: 9/14