<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Drug Channels</title><description>Expert viewpoints by Dr. Adam J. Fein on pharmacy economics and the pharmaceutical supply chain</description><link>http://www.drugchannels.net/</link><managingEditor>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>357</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DrugChannels" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDrugChannels" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDrugChannels" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDrugChannels" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/DrugChannels" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDrugChannels" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDrugChannels" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FDrugChannels" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:browserFriendly>Expert viewpoints by Dr. Adam J. Fein on pharmacy economics and the pharmaceutical supply chain</feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-4255734243356378608</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-06T09:43:12.491-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mergers and Acquisitions</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><title>CVS Caremark: Pharmacy Gain, PBM Pain</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/XExBkiFCr7c/cvs-caremark-pharmacy-gain-pbm-pain.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SvO6z05_QiI/AAAAAAAABE4/sOY3uSxO5Eg/s72-c/The_Odd_Couple.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>CVS Caremark disclosed unexpected problems in its PBM business yesterday, spooking investors and sending its stock down by 20%. See Dow Jones’ coverage: CVS' Pharmacy Benefit Struggles Renew Merger Benefits Debate

Judging by the financials, it sure looks like CVS Caremark has sacrificed its PBM business for the benefit of the retail pharmacy business. They are also having trouble explaining how a PBM customer gains when a brick-and-mortar pharmacy is paired with a benefit management business.

Adding insult to injury, CVS Caremark also disclosed that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=XExBkiFCr7c:nzqjNojTQbQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/XExBkiFCr7c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/11/cvs-caremark-pharmacy-gain-pbm-pain.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-5677638541721043285</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-05T06:32:21.758-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Marketing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Fun Stuff</category><title>Dilbert on Drug Marketing</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/I95rPhXO76Y/dilbert-on-drug-marketing.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>As a follow-up to Tuesday's post, management guru Scott Adams shows how promotion by a pharmaceutical manufacturer affects physicians' prescribing decisions.



Of course, this topic may not be funny for much longer given 40,000 recently announced job cuts by Johnson &amp;amp; Johnson, Pfizer, and Astra-Zeneca or the 16,000 cuts planned by Merck.


Copyright © 2006-2009 Pembroke Consulting, Inc. and Copyright © 2006-2009 Drug Channels blog. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. &lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=I95rPhXO76Y:Qa7wqnBVkTI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/I95rPhXO76Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/11/dilbert-on-drug-marketing.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-6148432261886677320</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-03T07:00:50.034-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Generic Drugs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Channel Management</category><title>How Generics Change the Market</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/ZE2qCfdGHhE/how-generics-change-market.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/Su93X9StGwI/AAAAAAAABEo/1m_8BadIBeI/s72-c/Substitute.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">6</thr:total><description>I just came across an intriguing new study that examines how generic drug entry affects prescription volume and manufacturer revenues. See TIME RELEASE: The Effect of Patent Expiration on U.S. Drug Prices, Marketing, and Utilization by the Public

The paper poses an interesting question and contains some neat data on post-generic market evolution—brand market share, prices, promotional expenses. I’m a bit underwhelmed by the author’s conclusions. So, I suggest that you enjoy the pretty pictures and perhaps incorporate the conceptual ideas into your forecasting models.

The authors use monthly...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=ZE2qCfdGHhE:taEukBJmMUQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/ZE2qCfdGHhE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/11/how-generics-change-market.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-7220551569236226647</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-30T08:36:25.169-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Fun Stuff</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wholesalers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Policy</category><title>Noteworthy News Stories</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/EdEBu6Mn4YA/noteworthy-news-stories.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SupFIoCCrKI/AAAAAAAABEI/zNDAEFda6_8/s72-c/Monsters.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total><description>Here are some worthwhile articles for your reading pleasure. As always, I welcome story links from Drug Channels readers.

As a special treat, I am including a picture of my Halloween costume at the bottom of the post. Happy Halloween!

Face-Off: Pharmaceutical Distributors
A financial blogger ranks the stock market prospects of the Big 3 drug wholesalers--AmerisourceBergen(ABC), Cardinal Health (CAH), and McKesson (MCK). Can you guess who comes out on top?

CVS Caremark Drug-Benefit Pitches Missed The Mark For Some
The premise of this Dow Jones article from early September: "CVS Caremark...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=EdEBu6Mn4YA:HZ1-tVEk-rI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/EdEBu6Mn4YA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/noteworthy-news-stories.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-3787699362431238257</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-29T15:17:28.732-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><title>Should pharmacies be liable for stupid patients?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/Ilws74hYgcc/should-pharmacies-be-liable-for-stupid.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SuihSPLI6KI/AAAAAAAABDw/M0zM8gtulng/s72-c/hutz.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">12</thr:total><description>Yesterday’s Wall Street Journal had a scary cover story titled Case Spurs Pharmacies' Fears of Lawsuits Over Drug Abuse.  (Click here for a free summary if you can't access the article.)

The article describes a lawsuit against a group of pharmacies for dispensing prescription painkillers to a woman who killed someone while driving high on hydrocodone.

Just my $0.02, but I think it’s ludicrous to pin the blame on a pharmacy for the deranged behavior of one consumer. The pharmacy chains are being dragged into this case because they have deep pockets, not because they should be responsible for...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=Ilws74hYgcc:xPUMnyn1Zq4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/Ilws74hYgcc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/should-pharmacies-be-liable-for-stupid.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-2395676646104245709</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-28T17:24:03.417-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Blog Administration</category><title>Best Of</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/CbOALbD3C7o/best-of.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SndnxWRr06I/AAAAAAAAA4w/oqhNxxa7dVg/s72-c/blue+ribbon.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>There are almost 400 posts on Drug Channels. New readers often ask me for a list of the "best" ones.

Here is my periodically updated selections. Unfortunately, some of my best posts were very timely and/or humorous analyses of news events, which means those posts now sound quite dated and sort of lame.

I am listing the best posts for answering the top questions that people ask me. As far as I know, these posts are still valid although some of the information may have been superseded by new developments.
I wrote the U.S. Pharmacy Industry: Economic Report and Outlook to provide an integrated...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=CbOALbD3C7o:QAHDBrv61GM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/CbOALbD3C7o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/01/best-of.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-6790089797913034187</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-27T08:31:48.012-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wholesalers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Industry Trends</category><title>Drug Channels Earnings Calendar</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/cDvtEvy0eYs/drug-channels-earnings-calendar.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SuYZjBCyNaI/AAAAAAAABDo/unou7G_5ws8/s72-c/Richie-Rich.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><description>In an unusual confluence of the calendar, the big 3 drug wholesalers and big 3 pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) will all be reporting their latest financial results on 4 of the next 9 days. These financial reports and accompanying conference calls provide invaluable insights into the strategies and economics of companies within U.S. drug channels.

As a service to Drug Channels readers, I'm providing a brief rundown of the upcoming calendar along with links to the earnings conference call webcasts for each company. If you don’t have time to listen to the calls, free transcripts show up on...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=cDvtEvy0eYs:O6lk7R9PHZQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/cDvtEvy0eYs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/drug-channels-earnings-calendar.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-9058341307427534668</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-21T08:22:49.204-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Generic Drugs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Industry Trends</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Channel Management</category><title>Medco Takes on Eli Lilly</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/21fV3khAQJo/medco-takes-on-eli-lilly.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/St5xqQ6A8TI/AAAAAAAABDQ/Tdvbg_PLBoI/s72-c/DivergingPaths.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total><description>Yesterday, Medco Health Solutions (NYSE:MHS) announced its intention to launch a comparative effectiveness study of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Plavix® versus Eli Lilly’s Effient®. See the press release.

Why, you may ask, would a Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) want to conduct a clinical trial?

Big hint: Effient was approved in July 2009. Plavix will be subject to generic competition in 2011.

Now, can you guess which of the two products will be simultaneously less expensive for payers and more profitable for Medco?

SAVING MONEY, MAKING MONEY

Dr. Robert Epstein, Medco's chief medical officer,...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=21fV3khAQJo:xPSiXZLMfoQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/21fV3khAQJo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/medco-takes-on-eli-lilly.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-6495886377490366148</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T08:38:49.245-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Reform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Policy</category><title>Healthcare Reform: Bullish for PBMs, but Not Pharmacies</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/6z6V_AUH1vU/healthcare-reform-bullish-for-pbms-but.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/St0dDTZrWlI/AAAAAAAABCY/mR-SKpVCy5M/s72-c/bull.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">6</thr:total><description>"a brand-new market for Medco to serve”

That’s the view on the Senate’s health reform proposal from David Snow, CEO of Medco Health Solutions (NYSE:MHS) as reported yesterday in CEOs Tally Health-Bill Score.

Right now, it looks like healthcare reform will benefit Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) by expanding coverage. Retail pharmacies would benefit from increased prescription volume but will likely see gross margins drop as the uninsured get the advantage of third-party bargaining power.

The Bullish Case for PBMs

If you believe the CBO’s October 7 analysis of the America’s Healthy Future...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=6z6V_AUH1vU:6MfSH7hIzC8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/6z6V_AUH1vU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/healthcare-reform-bullish-for-pbms-but.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-4088781979159250587</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-16T08:00:34.592-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Supply Chain Technology</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Specialty Drugs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Channel Management</category><title>Provider Pain in the Healthcare Supply Chain</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/ltu034NfZqk/provider-pain-in-healthcare-supply.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/StfmOIOeHJI/AAAAAAAABCQ/dyl-vpTMjQY/s72-c/wile-e-coyote.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><description>The State of Healthcare Logistics: Cost and Quality Improvement Opportunities is a worthy new study highlighting successes and challenges for the healthcare supply chain. Download it for free here.

As I summarize below, the findings highlight how providers struggle with missing data standards and stubbornly high inventory costs.

The report got me thinking about the future of the specialty pharmaceuticals distribution channel. I see an emerging opportunity for manufacturers to use their supply chains as a new source of competitive advantage, especially as payers limit provider’s...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=ltu034NfZqk:UDBBwBJzh_o:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/ltu034NfZqk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/provider-pain-in-healthcare-supply.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-6184701370905086322</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-13T08:47:54.487-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Industry Trends</category><title>Interpreting IMS’ Shiny Happy New Forecast</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/mn5PRaf2Mls/interpreting-ims-shiny-happy-new.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/StPG-HN4T2I/AAAAAAAABCI/EGvsuh87twU/s72-c/Carnac.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>IMS Health raised its 2009 U.S. growth forecast last week to a range of +4.5% to +5.5% and its 2010 forecast to a range of +3% to +5%. See IMS Health Forecasts Global Pharmaceutical Market Growth. Recall that IMS was forecasting a 2009 decline of -1% to -2% just 6 months ago, although the upgrade is no surprise given recent sales trends.

I want to clarify precisely what IMS is projecting and speculate on how it relates to the margins and revenues of drugstores, wholesalers, and Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs). I’m also curious to hear what you think about this new, more optimistic...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=mn5PRaf2Mls:Ci3uQIIw3So:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/mn5PRaf2Mls" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/interpreting-ims-shiny-happy-new.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-7141497350705994315</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T09:37:57.995-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Reform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Policy</category><title>Scoring the CBO</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/FxAeCMYNmVs/scoring-cbo.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/Ss8uUN_aDHI/AAAAAAAABB4/n9_2mX6bRjw/s72-c/Mermaid.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total><description>Must-read editorial in the Wall Street Journal this morning on the flaws in the CBO’s scoring of the Baucus health care bill.  Check out The Greatest Show on Earth.
“Behold: a new $829 billion entitlement that will subsidize insurance for tens of millions of people—and reduce deficits by $81 billion at the same time. In the next tent, see the mermaid and a two-headed cow.”
Perhaps this article will distract you from the, um, unexpected WTF news that President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. This is not a joke. See the video below.


Poll: Happy, Healthy Obamas Out Of Touch With Miserable...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=FxAeCMYNmVs:BqYRxSw2dXs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/FxAeCMYNmVs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/scoring-cbo.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-8196901568956792406</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-08T10:27:41.951-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Industry Trends</category><title>A Phony Mail Order Controversy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/AzxjWRpwqsk/phony-mail-order-controversy.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/Ss1O50VDgHI/AAAAAAAABBw/vJpYT7vNIVE/s72-c/Stats.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">16</thr:total><description>Are consumers satisfied with mail-order pharmacies?

The J.D. Power and Associates 2009 National Pharmacy Study shows high average satisfaction at mail-order pharmacies. Yet the National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA) issued a press release immediately after the J.D. Power results claiming Patient Survey Finds Widespread Problems With Mail Order Pharmacies.

Drug Topics magazine duly reported on the “controversy” of these supposedly “conflicting results.”

Now, I don't want to get off on a rant here, but it’s inaccurate and intellectually dishonest to compare the NCPA’s aggregation...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=AzxjWRpwqsk:vFraxLWtDW8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/AzxjWRpwqsk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/phony-mail-order-controversy.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-1840599158199332672</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-07T09:55:04.882-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wholesalers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Industry Trends</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Channel Management</category><title>A Peek at Drug Wholesalers' Economics</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/umacIDi6HWA/peek-at-drug-wholesalers-economics.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SswI0SbKfaI/AAAAAAAABBY/blsropo66nI/s72-c/09-factbook.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total><description>If you sell to (or buy from) drug wholesalers, you should consider buying the new 2009-2010 HDMA Factbook, just released by the research arm of the drug wholesaler’s trade association.

This report is valuable for anyone who negotiates with or analyzes drug wholesalers, although you’ll need to be careful when interpreting the reported statistics. I note a few highlights about drug wholesalers' profitability below and suggest two creative uses of the data.

Unfortunately, I must qualify my purchase recommendation because HDMA has decided not to make the report available as an electronic PDF...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=umacIDi6HWA:eGjf1IA35lA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/umacIDi6HWA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/peek-at-drug-wholesalers-economics.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-6959075040955598572</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-06T07:23:24.120-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Medicare Part D</category><title>CVS' Losses in 2010 Part D Enrollment</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/AfV57AE6pLQ/cvs-losses-in-2010s-part-d-enrollment.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SspkyuiWm0I/AAAAAAAABBI/iJeBqPbpLo4/s72-c/2010-poster01.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>Last week, the Centers for Medicare &amp;amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) released information about Medicare Part D stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDPs) available in 2010. Click here to view the raw CMS plan data.

The surprising news comes from CVS Caremark's (NYSE:CVS) loss of 30 to 35% of its Low income Subsidy (LIS) Part D members. This drop will reduce earnings per share for the company. See CVS Caremark Statement Regarding Results of 2010 Medicare Part D Bidding Process.

Here’s a quick look at what happened last week. I’ll save my speculations on the status of CVS Caremark’s PBM...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=AfV57AE6pLQ:SDC2WxgFX4o:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/AfV57AE6pLQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/cvs-losses-in-2010s-part-d-enrollment.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-6139530489771285119</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-02T08:44:29.014-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Fun Stuff</category><title>CVS Gets Ahead of Walgreens...with Chia Obama!</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/k-On9I8AahU/cvs-gets-ahead-of-walgreenswith-chia.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SsTG6_xWsjI/AAAAAAAABBA/1Bp8qeB9nBY/s72-c/chia-obama-.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">7</thr:total><description>CVS Caremark (NYSE:CVS) has made a bold strategic move that puts it head and shoulders above rival Walgreen (NYSE:WAG) in the all-important Presidential Decorative Planter Category (PDPC).

Yes, you guessed right. CVS stores will soon begin stocking the Obama Chia.

This is not a joke. See the video below.

Walgreen pulled the Obama Chia from its stores back in April. Fortunately, CVS will fill the gaping hole in our nation’s soul and do a test run at CVS stores in Chicago, Tampa and San Francisco.

Check out the ad:



This is not a political endorsement or a comment on health care reform....&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=k-On9I8AahU:b8fGLa2algQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/k-On9I8AahU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/cvs-gets-ahead-of-walgreenswith-chia.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-2566254009790277418</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-01T09:01:43.800-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy Economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Industry Trends</category><title>Walgreen's Future Profit Potential</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/CBG53R0cZVI/walgreens-future-profit-potential.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SsSiqmKaCtI/AAAAAAAABA4/oNalh7CA2I4/s72-c/crystal_ball.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">7</thr:total><description>Walgreen (NYSE:WAG) posted better than expected sales and announced major progress in its cost-cutting efforts, leading its stock to pop about 10% on Tuesday. Here’s the official release: Walgreen Co. Reports Fourth Quarter 2009 Earnings of 44 Cents Per Diluted Share

Walgreen’s strategic moves are in sync with two important industry trends that I analyze in my (hint, hint) new U.S. Pharmacy Industry: 2009 Economic Report and Outlook:
The growing advantage of low-cost prescription fulfillmentThe expansion of channel-neutral dispensing modelsBoth factors—dispensing efficiency and integrated...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=CBG53R0cZVI:3OWE9wqNQac:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/CBG53R0cZVI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/10/walgreens-future-profit-potential.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-2316806370458060198</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-30T08:43:38.180-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy Economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Industry Trends</category><title>Download My New Pharmacy Industry Report</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/hwHxd0zSk5k/download-my-new-pharmacy-industry.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SsKs3D0jwQI/AAAAAAAABAw/Esrq76mEK7s/s72-c/PharmacyCoverNew.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><description>I am pleased to announce the release of my new downloadable report U.S. Pharmacy Industry: 2009 Economic Report and Outlook. Here’s the Dow Jones story: Report: US Pharmacy Revenues To Surpass $350 Billion By 2015.

I’m really proud of the report and think you’ll find it to be a valuable planning tool. I want to tell you a bit about the content and give blog readers a sneak peek at the seven major trends.

I also want to offer something special for you, my blog readers. I will randomly select 5 of first 25 Corporate License purchasers for a confidential 60 minute conference call with me to...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=hwHxd0zSk5k:6cPS8vK5INE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/hwHxd0zSk5k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/09/download-my-new-pharmacy-industry.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-2234212233817916860</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-25T10:00:43.664-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy Economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Costs/Reimbursement</category><title>AWP Goes Boom</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/leSTAKnPDlo/awp-goes-boom.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SrwyxrW_KXI/AAAAAAAABAo/VSkmUDv_w5A/s72-c/boom.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">9</thr:total><description>Tomorrow’s the day that First DataBank’s Average Wholesale Price (AWP) goes boom. See What Happens When AWP Goes Boom for background.

My view is that there's not going to be much of a difference after Sept. 26. As I see it, the net impact on total U.S. drug spending will be relatively small and certainly far below the initial multibillion-dollar predictions from a few years ago.

The Medicaid issue is more complex, but not fatal. So far, New Jersey has already announced a reimbursement change that will partly neutralize the impact. (See this NACDS press release.)

And as for the future of...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=leSTAKnPDlo:86HbHsU_3VM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/leSTAKnPDlo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/09/awp-goes-boom.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-5100337078032759678</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-24T07:00:12.816-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy Economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Industry Trends</category><title>Wal-Mart Explains Its Healthcare Strategy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/ymMmQjqA5uY/wal-mart-explains-its-healthcare.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/Srrl7tbjd2I/AAAAAAAABAg/jqyvRXTIQCQ/s72-c/Top_Secret.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">14</thr:total><description>The latest issue of Health Affairs has a fascinating insider’s view on how Wal-Mart views healthcare services (including pharmacy dispensing). Read it here: Removing Costs From The Health Care Supply Chain: Lessons From Mass Retail

The article's subtitle says it all: “Many standard health care products and services should be ‘commoditized’—and priced accordingly.”

Translation: Pharmacies should be ready to compete on price, not just customer satisfaction.

It’s important to understand Wal-Mart's message although I doubt many pharmacy owners (and even some PBM executives) will agree with...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=ymMmQjqA5uY:rqTDlCezW8g:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/ymMmQjqA5uY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/09/wal-mart-explains-its-healthcare.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-7333686064626500892</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-22T00:01:00.740-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mergers and Acquisitions</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Industry Trends</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Policy</category><title>PBM Consolidation Ahead (redux)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/iMVUaULBHVg/pbm-consolidation-ahead-redux.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/Sq_2yD5itVI/AAAAAAAABAA/A2iZ1KicQ-k/s72-c/merge.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total><description>In early June, I laid out the five reasons why I expect PBM Consolidation Ahead.

The prospects for more consolidation seem even higher now, especially in light of recent news about CVS Caremark (CVS) and Medco Health Solutions (MHS). I also think that health care reform will end up being a net positive for the PBM industry, increasing the need for more scale.

I estimate that the big three PBMs – CVS Caremark (Pharmacy Services), Express Scripts, and Medco Health Solutions – will process about 45% of all prescriptions filled in a retail drug store in 2009. I would not be surprised if that...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=iMVUaULBHVg:hzA-EQQToyg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/iMVUaULBHVg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/09/pbm-consolidation-ahead-redux.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-7721275823324442014</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-18T08:34:29.687-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><title>Pharmacists Can't Get No Satisfaction from Mail</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/7AGAc2mm0b4/pharmacists-cant-get-no-satisfaction.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SrGWHND2cCI/AAAAAAAABAY/ofPl1ksMQJM/s72-c/Satisfaction-us.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">10</thr:total><description>Hot on the heels of Walmart’s mail pharmacy announcement, the National Association of Community Pharmacists (NCPA) issued a statement highlighting the purported dangers of using any type of mail pharmacy:  Despite Wal-Mart's Assertion, New Mail Order Program Will Not Benefit Patients.

But at the risk of further annoying the irate independent pharmacists who post comments on this blog, I regret to inform you (and NCPA) that the facts do not show mail pharmacy to be an inconvenient, patient-killing scam.

I CAN’T GET NO…

NCPA, which represents owners of independent pharmacies, makes some...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=7AGAc2mm0b4:J6_0wSwDv9A:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/7AGAc2mm0b4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/09/pharmacists-cant-get-no-satisfaction.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-659445623906914095</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T09:38:13.075-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Reform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Costs/Reimbursement</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Average Manufacturer Price (AMP)</category><title>Baucus Bill: Weighted AMP+75%</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/aUkyEB-sglA/baucus-bill-weighted-amp175.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/SrESB5pw6uI/AAAAAAAABAI/AIvAZijEFkg/s72-c/AMPed.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">6</thr:total><description>Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus officially released the text of a massive health care reform bill. Read the full text of the Baucus plan – 223 pages of wonky goodness.

The “Changes to Medicaid Payment for Prescription Drugs” (page 55) sets the Federal Upper Limit (FUL) to the weighted Average Manufacturer Price (WAMP?) x 175%, i.e., WAMP+75%.

Quick reaction: While 175% is less than 250%, I expect WAMP to be greater than AMP, especially since the proposal excludes mail order pharmacies. Seems like a victory for the pharmacy groups that lobbied for an increase, although I predict...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=aUkyEB-sglA:YH_bZ4ZDpaI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/aUkyEB-sglA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/09/baucus-bill-weighted-amp175.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-3912560124625773171</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-16T06:57:49.943-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Generic Drugs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PBMs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><title>The Impact of Walmart's National Mail Pharmacy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/EuIPAiLQuew/impact-of-walmarts-national-mail.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/Sq_zl1UnkJI/AAAAAAAAA_4/xbXRu5k-aPs/s72-c/male.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">10</thr:total><description>Walmart just went national with its mail pharmacy program, an outcome that I had predicted in May when the company launched its initial trial in Michigan. Details here: Walmart Expands Access to Affordable Prescriptions Nationwide. Walmart is offering 300 generic prescriptions for $10 each and more than 3,000 other brand and generic prescriptions with free mail delivery.

This announcement expands the retail pharmacy price war over generic drugs, puts further pressure on pharmacy margins from cash-pay customers, and sets the stage for more cost-plus deals. More intriguingly, it portends an...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=EuIPAiLQuew:_jKUAd-c_7M:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/EuIPAiLQuew" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/09/impact-of-walmarts-national-mail.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-961713091185959917</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-15T07:00:54.987-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Generic Drugs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pharmacy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Costs/Reimbursement</category><title>Pharmacies Sued for Making Money on Generic Drugs</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DrugChannels/~3/_cIz1ZZcy3w/pharmacies-sued-for-making-money-on.html</link><author>afein@pembrokeconsulting.com (Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWcjP1QZBJI/Sp0jBtg8bNI/AAAAAAAAA74/VQm36UuRZqg/s72-c/marge.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">6</thr:total><description>Here’s an unusual case that I haven't seen reported anywhere else.



Two small health plans in Minnesota are suing pharmacies for making higher profits on generic drugs than on brand name drugs. Perhaps the attorneys went to the Lake Wobegon School for Pharmacy Management. (“All the pharmacists are strong, all the technicians are good-looking, and all the profits are above average.”)



While I have no idea whether the legal claims have any merit, the case again highlights the risks to the superior profitability of generic drugs for pharmacies and Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs).



THE...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the Drug Channels site to read the rest of the story.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?a=_cIz1ZZcy3w:pUJNYhsJpjo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/DrugChannels?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DrugChannels/~4/_cIz1ZZcy3w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.drugchannels.net/2009/09/pharmacies-sued-for-making-money-on.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
