<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>ethics</category><category>Canada Parliament</category><category>Hulk Hogan</category><category>ymca</category><category>Foreign Policy</category><category>Justin Timberlake</category><category>Jane Stewart</category><category>mullet</category><category>Wayne Gretzky Sports Centre</category><category>immigration</category><category>Brant Conservatives</category><category>Six Nations</category><category>gun nut</category><category>oshweken</category><category>Member of Parliament</category><category>stimulus spending</category><category>debate</category><category>time machine</category><category>Laurier-Brantford</category><category>Patriot Forge</category><category>Dump Phil</category><category>Bill C-389</category><category>sustainability</category><category>automatic weapons</category><category>Phil McColeman</category><category>Brantford Expositor</category><category>Bear Attack</category><category>Economic Action Plan</category><category>Greenbriar School</category><category>cronyism</category><category>Paris</category><category>Wilfred Laurier University</category><category>Stockwell Day</category><category>lies</category><category>pork-barrel</category><category>Conservative</category><category>firearms registry</category><category>celebration</category><category>Canadian election</category><category>Phil is a culo</category><category>Mike Duffy</category><category>embarrassing</category><category>Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security</category><category>James Bezan.Rob Anders.</category><category>Brantford</category><category>chuck strahl</category><category>Stormont-Dundas-South Glengarry</category><category>Canada economy</category><category>mohawk college</category><category>oversize cheques</category><category>logic</category><category>perks</category><category>prorogation</category><category>F-35 stealth fighters</category><category>Bill C-49</category><category>roundtable</category><category>oliver's jewellers</category><category>Maclean's</category><category>Canada Federal Election 2011</category><category>election office</category><category>Brantford Red Sox</category><category>Keith Martin</category><category>tough on crime</category><category>water treatment plant</category><category>seniors</category><category>House of Commons votes</category><category>defecit</category><category>transparency</category><category>sign</category><category>negotiation</category><category>green technologies</category><category>The Globe and Mail</category><category>Internment</category><category>government accountability</category><category>Andrew Kania</category><category>unemployment</category><category>economic growth</category><category>Indian and Northern Affairs Canada</category><category>Rob Nicholson</category><category>dumb on crime</category><category>Rosemary Barton</category><category>china</category><category>Phil hearts Pork</category><category>Mark Holland</category><category>Ghostwriter</category><category>Sex Offender Information Registry Act</category><category>time warp</category><category>G20</category><category>gun control</category><category>giant cheques</category><category>downtown</category><category>Brantford City Council</category><category>passport</category><category>education</category><category>Deer Attacks</category><category>Taser Inquiry</category><category>photo-op</category><category>Liar</category><category>New Democratic Party</category><category>coalition</category><category>Election 41</category><category>Caledonia</category><category>Correctional Service of Canada</category><category>Richard Carpenter</category><category>John McCallum</category><category>partisan spending</category><category>laureier brant</category><category>environment</category><category>gun registry</category><category>Laurier Brantford</category><category>Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner</category><category>Ron Cannan.</category><category>shame</category><category>UN Security Council</category><category>Election</category><category>Hamilton event</category><category>recession investment</category><category>fire hydrant</category><category>Brant</category><category>Canada Senate</category><category>transgendered rights</category><category>Scott Simms</category><category>Canada Family Action</category><category>100th post</category><category>time-space continuum</category><category>Useless</category><category>muzzle</category><category>first nations</category><category>Stephen Harper</category><category>Pork</category><category>Philnoccio</category><category>green collar jobs</category><category>deficit</category><category>platform</category><category>Derek McElveny</category><category>Pat Martin</category><category>campaign office</category><category>passport clinic</category><category>conspiracy</category><category>Italian-Canadian</category><category>Compassion</category><category>United Nations</category><category>outer space</category><category>calwyn shurgold</category><category>BlackBerry</category><category>Kevin Page</category><category>bacon</category><category>buddies</category><category>land claims</category><category>phil sucks</category><category>gun crime</category><category>child pornography</category><category>parrot</category><category>twitter</category><category>investment</category><category>Peter McKay</category><category>Jack Layton</category><category>Derek Blackburn</category><category>paranoia</category><category>Conservative Party of Canada</category><category>Marc Laferriere</category><category>skiing</category><category>brant cultural centre</category><category>canadian flag</category><category>Lloyd St. Amand</category><category>Liberal Party of Canada</category><category>Nora Fueten</category><category>John Baird</category><title>Dump Phil McColeman</title><description>Because Brant's had its fill of Phil</description><link>http://www.dumpphil.ca/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>106</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DumpPhil" /><feedburner:info uri="dumpphil" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-8700137563993306096</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-29T12:01:11.961-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">gun control</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">gun registry</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">logic</category><title>Logic? Never heard of it.</title><atom:summary>Some politicians when making important policy decisions use a mixture of statistics, academic studies, advisory reports and the general public mood at the time. Other politicians base their decisions on isolated anecdotes that go against ALL of the other evidence. Which camp do you think Phil is in?

On October 27, Phil said:
"[W]hen this came before committee, we heard witnesses from the police </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/kPEEdyF8sQU/logic-never-heard-of-it.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Izw_1q-9Rvw/TqwjIYVHQ6I/AAAAAAAAAKs/WIxU9N3nw6Y/s72-c/logic+cartoon.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/kPEEdyF8sQU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/10/logic-never-heard-of-it.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-26530735745925591</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-27T12:19:59.181-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pat Martin</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">New Democratic Party</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Liar</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dump Phil</category><title>Forgetful Phil Wrongly Accuses Another MP of Lying!</title><atom:summary>Yesterday in Ottawa, Phil McColeman called another Member of Parliament (MP) a liar. Phil said:
"Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.

"During question period today, the member for Winnipeg Centre quoted this member as saying something that I categorically did not say. I would like him to table the document that he is referring to where that quote was made, as well as the source and the time </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/5VBltbWpsTg/phils-phorgetful-memory.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/ChJ75g8o_8k/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/5VBltbWpsTg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/10/phils-phorgetful-memory.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4635901565890693412</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-03T01:05:09.063-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dump Phil</category><title>Reflection on the Lack of Dumping Phil</title><atom:summary>Unfortunately for Brant, 30.1% of eligible voters decided to vote for Phil. Sometimes even democracy screws up, even though it's the best system we have.

It was an exciting night, though. Laferriere for a while looked like he was going to have a chance, but then the numbers bounced back blue. Perhaps Laferriere will fight again, next time successfully. Perhaps St. Amand will step aside, </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/Suxe6L9NlYY/reflection-on-lack-of-dumping-phil.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uLJiJUWSK40/Tb-Li6lgsUI/AAAAAAAAAKc/N6qEbQCez44/s72-c/pill.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>6</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/Suxe6L9NlYY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/05/reflection-on-lack-of-dumping-phil.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4515866858730432400</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-02T13:38:51.425-04:00</atom:updated><title>Endorsement Time!  Pass or PHaIL?</title><atom:summary>After talking to residents of Brantford, hearing feedback from the debates,  reading the hundreds of emails that we have received since our first post, and after much deliberation, we have JUST decided that it's time to DUMP PHIL!
Even if Harper gets a majority, Phil would still be a muzzled backbencher and a terrible advocate for his constituents.
If Harper gets a minority, Phil would continue </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/0h-Za68ploM/endorsement-time-pass-or-phail.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/xs8s9UNvglQ/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>9</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/0h-Za68ploM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/05/endorsement-time-pass-or-phail.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-1021782346779717755</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-29T14:45:10.784-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">transgendered rights</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sign</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">campaign office</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bill C-389</category><title>Phil McColeman: Soft on Hate Crime</title><atom:summary>Phil McColeman's views on gender and sexual identity rights are clear: he has publicly stated that he opposes same-sex marriage, and was at one point associated with a coalition lobbying to make same-sex marriage illegal.

Phil McColeman's views on crime are also clear: he supports getting "tough on crime".

So how does Phil feel about hate crime against transgendered people? Answer: he doesn't </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/0sQscPdLymE/phil-mccoleman-soft-on-hate-crime.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-35PNLBTMeKg/TblUVwq5_BI/AAAAAAAAAKU/giJhL9-niVE/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-opposes-equality.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/0sQscPdLymE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-mccoleman-soft-on-hate-crime.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-2308637814672575104</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-26T18:39:57.055-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Member of Parliament</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">shame</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford City Council</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wayne Gretzky Sports Centre</category><title>Phil Shirks Responsibility… Again</title><atom:summary>Phil McColeman has insulted Brantford's hard-working city councillors by blaming them entirely for the cost overruns at the Gretzky Centre renovation.

As this blog has repeatedly stated, the cost overruns are almost entirely due to an unreasonably tight deadline on stimulus spending – a deadline implemented by the Conservative government. (For DumpPhil's past coverage of this issue, see "Phil's </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/J4BMp7A9X5s/phil-shirks-responsibility-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-84kqTO7mP1U/TbdIv80Wt_I/AAAAAAAAAKQ/HaNDump3WEk/s72-c/Phil-McColema-not-my-fault.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>7</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/J4BMp7A9X5s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-shirks-responsibility-again.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4756158794515824680</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-25T02:22:53.875-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">celebration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">100th post</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Member of Parliament</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dump Phil</category><title>Dump Phil Reaches 100!</title><atom:summary>This post marks the 100th entry since DumpPhil started reporting on the poor performance of Phil McColeman. It's quite an achievement. In a little over two years literally thousands of unique readers have visited the blog – on which we have spent $0. We are proud to have raised the level of political awareness and discourse in Brant.

Some of our greatest hits have included "Phil McColeman: Soft </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/5Je7hc78xaw/dumpphilca-reaches-100.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LDOfXnRRh5o/TbUQil-lnOI/AAAAAAAAAKI/Vk7PLK3RPiA/s72-c/Dump-Phil-McColeman-100th-post" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/5Je7hc78xaw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/dumpphilca-reaches-100.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-5556963751704226250</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-25T04:04:26.396-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">debate</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election 41</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">transparency</category><title>Phil Makes the List</title><atom:summary>Phil made the list of Conservative candidates who chickened out of an all-candidates debate!

Brantfordians should be proud. Not only do we have an MP who takes his job for granted, we also have a Prime Minister who is chicken-scared wholesale of talking to the public and the media.

</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/fZ6oxCQ1e1Y/phil-makes-list.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rl7D_3Z_xMo/TbRP9HBz7kI/AAAAAAAAAKA/fFZgyFhOv8w/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-epic-fail.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/fZ6oxCQ1e1Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-makes-list.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-464817352898243256</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-22T17:00:14.190-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">time warp</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">oshweken</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">time machine</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lies</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">election office</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">time-space continuum</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">water treatment plant</category><title>Phil Does the Time Warp</title><atom:summary>The other day Phil was talking to his boss. He asked his boss to give him credit for doing a good job on a project. The boss responded that the project had been completed before Phil was even hired.

That's basically how the Chamber of Commerce all-candidates debate went down on Wednesday. Phil tried to take credit for funding a new water treatment facility in Ohsweken. Well we here at </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/gOSJUr6PmVQ/phil-does-time-warp_22.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TecLGRhwYIk/TbDj-bGyiZI/AAAAAAAAAJ4/IryJ8qKXSoE/s72-c/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-04-21%2Bat%2B10.10.20%2BPM.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>4</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/gOSJUr6PmVQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-does-time-warp_22.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-1145849015491937195</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-21T13:42:31.434-04:00</atom:updated><title>Did Lazy Phil bother to read his party's platform this time?</title><atom:summary>Sadly this is a REAL question that needs to be asked:"I HAVE NOT READ THE PLATFORM, IT'S SOOO NEW" - Phil McColeman, 2008 election debatePhil also promised to e-mail the platform to someone who asked for a hard copy, not only did Lazy Phil not read his party's platform but he also does not know how to use a printer!A reader spotted this image from yesterday's debate on the Brant News website, </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/0IyMSmJawyk/did-lazy-phil-bother-to-read-his-partys.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Disappointed)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/3qilmtNQA2o/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>4</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/0IyMSmJawyk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/did-lazy-phil-bother-to-read-his-partys.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-7609184775278990407</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-19T01:51:16.569-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Nora Fueten</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Marc Laferriere</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lloyd St. Amand</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election 41</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Compassion</category><title>Phil Has No Compassion</title><atom:summary>The Burford United Church held a different kind of "debate" last Sunday – one that "had an emphasis on compassion, creativity and a positive vision for Canada." What a wonderful idea in an age of increasingly negative campaigning.

Nora Feuten talked about how to mend the increasing gap between the rich and the poor.

Mark Laferriere talked about a community garden project that contributed to the</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/q5tcOZvF5zY/phil-has-no-compassion.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/qyfOxpyBkCE/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/q5tcOZvF5zY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-has-no-compassion.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-3285153773428649854</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-16T10:42:13.934-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">tough on crime</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">land claims</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Rob Nicholson</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">campaign office</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">dumb on crime</category><title>Why…</title><atom:summary>…does Phil focus on "Tough on Crime" instead of issues that really matter?

Why doesn't he talk about land claims? Why does he distract us from talking about the economy?


Phil's focus on "tough on crime" is embarrassing. He has embarrassed not only himself in Ottawa but also his Brant constituents. Phil has behaved like a buffoon talking about "tough on crime" while the crime rate has been </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/ac3kL4xaaNg/why.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Yt6hwm831Yo/TakTtiCgcPI/AAAAAAAAAJo/ggLB6u05jmg/s72-c/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-04-15%2Bat%2B11.40.57%2BPM.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>6</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/ac3kL4xaaNg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/why.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-2319782858402286400</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-15T03:26:41.739-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">F-35 stealth fighters</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canada economy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Economic Action Plan</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">deficit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">gun registry</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canada Federal Election 2011</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election 41</category><title>Phil McHypocrite</title><atom:summary>Somebody call the waaahmbulance – Phil's been complaining about the cost of an "unnecessary" democratic election again:
"They're upset about having an election that's costing $300 million especially when it's the fourth election in seven years."Well, Phil, let's crunch some numbers… 
$1.5 million: Annual cost of the gun registry that Phil wants to scrap.
$3.1 million: "A lot of money" in "small </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/Y254oSOXDzU/phil-mchypocrite.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ukB0RxgHjDU/TafmzgJw89I/AAAAAAAAAJc/bU9IQPC6BFI/s72-c/phil-mccoleman-trying-to-count.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>6</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/Y254oSOXDzU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-mchypocrite.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4189761786456769143</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-12T02:15:03.995-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford Expositor</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">outer space</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Nora Fueten</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Marc Laferriere</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lloyd St. Amand</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">campaign office</category><title>Who's telling the truth?</title><atom:summary>The Brantford Expositor asked all the candidates what most voters seem to be worried about. Here's the responses:
Lloyd St. Amand: Land Claims and Jobs
Marc Laferriere: Jobs and Healthcare
Nora Fueten: Healthcare, Partisanship, and Nuclear Power
Phil McColeman: Cost of an election
Three out of four candidates have something in common with another candidate. Those three also mention REAL policy </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/9KirREsBxdY/whos-telling-truth.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9gj_i43OJN8/TaPsizj4pbI/AAAAAAAAAJY/K_vk-xFZO4Q/s72-c/phil-mccoleman-campaign-office-space-jam.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/9KirREsBxdY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/whos-telling-truth.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-992950472634945860</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-11T00:04:46.889-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">muzzle</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The Globe and Mail</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">passport clinic</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fire hydrant</category><title>Vote For Your Local Fire Hydrant</title><atom:summary>We've already written a blog post comparing Phil McColeman to a fire hydrant. That's because Phil speaks for Stephen Harper, not for you.

Well the Globe &amp; Mail cartoonist must have met Phil too!

</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/y2qR5kn-B8w/vote-for-your-local-fire-hydrant.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IPpN_pgDFXU/TaJ8J-F9qSI/AAAAAAAAAJQ/3Yd1OP6mrao/s72-c/Phil%2Bin%2Bthe%2BGlobe%2Band%2BMail.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/y2qR5kn-B8w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/vote-for-your-local-fire-hydrant.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-8028045851725046593</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-10T11:46:44.014-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">unemployment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">stimulus spending</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><title>Hey Phil Where are the Jobs?</title><atom:summary>Looks like Harper the Economist still hasn't figured out how to run a country. Despite all those blue-and-green stimulus project signs, Brantford's unemployment rate hasn't improved since the recession:

When Phil was elected in 2008, unemployment was 5.9%. Within a year unemployment in Brant was 60% higher at 9.8% [source: StatsCan]. Coincidence?

</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/7RTwynmQsTw/hey-phil-where-are-jobs.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0sMdqA_Q6YQ/TaDVH-QTyhI/AAAAAAAAAI4/_ZPEewn4Hio/s72-c/unemployment-thanks-to-phil-mccoleman.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/7RTwynmQsTw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/hey-phil-where-are-jobs.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-2308636835317815788</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-09T17:29:26.780-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">bacon</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canadian election</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">platform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil hearts Pork</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">stimulus spending</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canada Federal Election 2011</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wayne Gretzky Sports Centre</category><title>Gretzky Centre Over Cost Because of Phil!</title><atom:summary>Phil was super-happy to brag all about the pork-barrel funding of the Gretzky Centre construction (in conjunction with Dave Levac). But the Harper government made an unreasonable deadline for using the money so that they could look good before an election. The deadline was eventually moved back, but the process had already been sped up. The shortened timeframe forced costs higher, and this was </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/EFULM4QsQnw/gretzky-centre-over-cost-because-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/EFULM4QsQnw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/gretzky-centre-over-cost-because-of.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-416919383916909502</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-06T00:48:23.431-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stephen Harper</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Patriot Forge</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Hamilton event</category><title>Stay Anonymous Or Get Kicked Out</title><atom:summary>If you comment on this blog you probably shouldn't leave your real name. If you do, you might one day find yourself in a similar situation as this young politico:
Joanna MacDonald, a fourth-year environmental sciences student at Guelph University, says she pre-registered for Harper's election campaign event at the school Monday.

But after arriving with a friend, MacDonald says she was directed </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/tIA7nkXydvU/stay-anonymous-folks.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HFyE1LmFT5A/TZvr8HuSVBI/AAAAAAAAAIM/5UDQGnC4K5w/s72-c/Kicked_Out.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>7</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/tIA7nkXydvU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/stay-anonymous-folks.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-6597021551065938010</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-05T04:01:23.781-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">gun control</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">G20</category><title>$3.1 million &gt; $1.2 billion: Phil McColeman</title><atom:summary>Stephen Harper has decided to take aim at the gun registry, claiming that it's too expensive.  The Conservative government had no problem spending over a billion dollars on a three day summit in Toronto last summer.Phil tried to argue that gun control is too expensive but out of control spending is okay: Phil is the same person who had no problem spending taxpayers' money on thousands of Canadian</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/paku9iRjM_Y/31-million-12-billion-phil-mccoleman.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Disappointed)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/yq6WDVOY9D4/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>4</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/paku9iRjM_Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/31-million-12-billion-phil-mccoleman.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4308375488884670925</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-05T01:23:11.927-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stephen Harper</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canada Federal Election 2011</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">twitter</category><title>Harper to Visit Hamilton Behind Closed Doors</title><atom:summary>Phil tweeted today:


Phil definitely has the ear of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Harper gave Phil a whole 3 days' notice that he was visiting near Brant.

More disturbingly, Harper is not willing to meet with the public at large. What kind of elected official is scared to meet with the public that she or he represents? It doesn't seem too democratic. You have to pre-register to go to the event</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/-RZx0RBIcTs/harper-to-visit-hamilton-behind-closed.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-olrJzO8nfPs/TZqhn2SQxII/AAAAAAAAAH0/_F6QA4q_Mv0/s72-c/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-04-05%2Bat%2B12.56.07%2BAM.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>6</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/-RZx0RBIcTs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/harper-to-visit-hamilton-behind-closed.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-6369374810227761365</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-04T02:50:55.273-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stephen Harper</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Jack Layton</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canada Federal Election 2011</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant</category><title>Would You Accept a Bribe for Your Vote?</title><atom:summary>Would you accept a bribe for your vote… if you knew you'd have to pay back the debt later?

If you would, Phil's your man He brought Gary Goodyear to the opening of his campaign office. Goodyear lauded Phil for bringing pork-barrel funds into Brant, while neglecting to mention the structural deficit that the Conservatives have racked up. Watch the video:



Phil is so close to his boss Prime </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/BMVO0X95MOk/would-you-accept-bribe-for-your-vote.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/BMVO0X95MOk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/would-you-accept-bribe-for-your-vote.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-6803822377526715853</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-02T12:13:26.541-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Laurier Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">education</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canada Federal Election 2011</category><title>Attention Laurier Brant Students: Don't Vote for Phil</title><atom:summary>Phil McColeman has gone on record saying that he opposes giving grants to post-secondary students because it "could make some students ineligible for other loans and grants".

Let me get this straight. Phil opposes giving students money because then they won't be poor enough to qualify for high-interest loans. Of course, with education grants those students won't need said loans. Phil's reasoning</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/r0JOVtGyqsk/attention-laurier-brant-students-dont.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-cRMJDs3ROpg/TZdK5WakIkI/AAAAAAAAAHs/OFh6iT3y5Qk/s72-c/%2B.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>8</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/r0JOVtGyqsk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/attention-laurier-brant-students-dont.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4374108211119819684</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-01T15:55:20.953-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">passport</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Economic Action Plan</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canada Federal Election 2011</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant</category><title>Phil Respects Taxpayers… APRIL FOOL'S!!</title><atom:summary>No doubt that during the election tons of great letters to the editor will be penned. Here's a gem from the Expositor:
Taxpayers on Hook for Conservative Ads

The Conservatives like to pretend that they didn't want an election but I'm not buying it. They had hoped to be defeated on a budget that was unacceptable to other parties because it was so misleading, but they were slapped in the face with</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/SUZec0U-7DY/phil-respects-taxpayers-april-fools.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-FrazyNw2mn4/TZYtJr-bA4I/AAAAAAAAAHk/VLM34wsTVak/s72-c/economicactionplansign.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/SUZec0U-7DY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-respects-taxpayers-april-fools.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-1870184824062443752</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-01T15:59:30.199-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stephen Harper</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canada Federal Election 2011</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Philnoccio</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">campaign office</category><title>McColeman Speaks for Harper, Not You</title><atom:summary>Ever since day one people were worried about Phil McColeman being muzzled. They were worried that his boss Stephen Harper would control everything he said. Well looking at McColeman's voting record, it seems that he is just a puppet controlled by Harper.

McColeman voted 204 times in the House of Parliament since 2008. He dissented from the Harper line twice. That's 2 out of 204 times that </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/HnvgCr3S7Os/mccoleman-speaks-for-harper-not-you.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-79ZFC3MI44k/TZWG-hU5CtI/AAAAAAAAAHY/JXpQbSqHLKk/s72-c/philnoccio.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>3</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/HnvgCr3S7Os" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/mccoleman-speaks-for-harper-not-you.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-5106685908937151221</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-03-31T03:45:29.159-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford Expositor</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">deficit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">John McCallum</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Canada Federal Election 2011</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kevin Page</category><title>Partisan Posturing and Trickle-Down Economics</title><atom:summary>Hours before a senior Liberal (who for years has been a respected Member of Parliament) was to visit the riding, Phil McColeman sent a message to the Brantford Expositor attacking the Liberal plan to eliminate a corporate tax cut. Phil defended the Conservative plan to cut taxes for corporations while making families wait 5 years for a tax cut:
Calling the Liberal rollback a "tax hike," the </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/AAHLCVPeD90/partisan-posturing-and-trickle-down.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/AAHLCVPeD90" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/03/partisan-posturing-and-trickle-down.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

