<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>ethics</category><category>Hulk Hogan</category><category>Foreign Policy</category><category>Justin Timberlake</category><category>Jane Stewart</category><category>online spying</category><category>mullet</category><category>Wayne Gretzky Sports Centre</category><category>Brant Conservatives</category><category>immigration</category><category>Six Nations</category><category>oshweken</category><category>Member of Parliament</category><category>abortion</category><category>debate</category><category>Laurier-Brantford</category><category>Patriot Forge</category><category>elderly</category><category>police powers</category><category>sustainability</category><category>automatic weapons</category><category>Conservatives</category><category>Economic Action Plan</category><category>cronyism</category><category>online privacy</category><category>lies</category><category>Stockwell Day</category><category>Wilfred Laurier University</category><category>Conservative</category><category>Phil is a culo</category><category>Mike Duffy</category><category>embarrassing</category><category>Brantford</category><category>Front Porch Strategies</category><category>prorogation</category><category>perks</category><category>Robo-calls</category><category>cartoon</category><category>roundtable</category><category>Canada Federal Election 2011</category><category>election office</category><category>Brantford Red Sox</category><category>water treatment plant</category><category>tough on crime</category><category>defecit</category><category>negotiation</category><category>government accountability</category><category>unemployment</category><category>Indian and Northern Affairs Canada</category><category>Rob Nicholson</category><category>dumb on crime</category><category>Phil hearts Pork</category><category>time warp</category><category>soldiers</category><category>poverty</category><category>giant cheques</category><category>Brantford City Council</category><category>passport</category><category>education</category><category>Deer Attacks</category><category>photo-op</category><category>#Occupy</category><category>Correctional Service of Canada</category><category>retirement</category><category>partisan spending</category><category>laureier brant</category><category>gun registry</category><category>OAS</category><category>Laurier Brantford</category><category>Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner</category><category>Ron Cannan.</category><category>UN Security Council</category><category>protest</category><category>Hamilton event</category><category>fire hydrant</category><category>Canada Senate</category><category>100th post</category><category>troops</category><category>Stephen Harper</category><category>first nations</category><category>Pork</category><category>Philnoccio</category><category>Bill C-30</category><category>Derek McElveny</category><category>Pat Martin</category><category>Italian-Canadian</category><category>women's rights</category><category>United Nations</category><category>buddies</category><category>gun crime</category><category>child pornography</category><category>twitter</category><category>parrot</category><category>investment</category><category>Bev Oda</category><category>Tea Party</category><category>Jack Layton</category><category>brant cultural centre</category><category>skiing</category><category>Lloyd St. Amand</category><category>Nora Fueten</category><category>Canada Parliament</category><category>ymca</category><category>gun nut</category><category>stimulus spending</category><category>respect for taxpayer</category><category>time machine</category><category>Bill C-389</category><category>Dump Phil</category><category>Phil McColeman</category><category>Bear Attack</category><category>Brantford Expositor</category><category>Greenbriar School</category><category>carbon tax</category><category>Old-Age Security</category><category>Paris</category><category>pork-barrel</category><category>Republican Party</category><category>firearms registry</category><category>Canadian election</category><category>celebration</category><category>Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security</category><category>James Bezan.Rob Anders.</category><category>chuck strahl</category><category>Stormont-Dundas-South Glengarry</category><category>Canada economy</category><category>cooperation</category><category>22-year-old staffers</category><category>mohawk college</category><category>oversize cheques</category><category>logic</category><category>F-35 stealth fighters</category><category>Bill C-49</category><category>oliver's jewellers</category><category>Maclean's</category><category>Keith Martin</category><category>House of Commons votes</category><category>seniors</category><category>transparency</category><category>green technologies</category><category>sign</category><category>Internment</category><category>The Globe and Mail</category><category>Andrew Kania</category><category>economic growth</category><category>liar liar</category><category>Rosemary Barton</category><category>china</category><category>Mark Holland</category><category>Ghostwriter</category><category>Sex Offender Information Registry Act</category><category>G20</category><category>gun control</category><category>downtown</category><category>Taser Inquiry</category><category>Liar</category><category>New Democratic Party</category><category>Caledonia</category><category>Election 41</category><category>coalition</category><category>Richard Carpenter</category><category>John McCallum</category><category>environment</category><category>shame</category><category>MP Pension</category><category>Election</category><category>recession investment</category><category>Brant</category><category>transgendered rights</category><category>Canada Family Action</category><category>Scott Simms</category><category>time-space continuum</category><category>Useless</category><category>muzzle</category><category>green collar jobs</category><category>deficit</category><category>Mobile</category><category>Justin Trudeau</category><category>platform</category><category>campaign office</category><category>passport clinic</category><category>conspiracy</category><category>QR code</category><category>Compassion</category><category>partisanship</category><category>outer space</category><category>BlackBerry</category><category>calwyn shurgold</category><category>Kevin Page</category><category>bacon</category><category>land claims</category><category>phil sucks</category><category>Motion 312</category><category>Peter McKay</category><category>attack ads</category><category>Derek Blackburn</category><category>scandal</category><category>Conservative Party of Canada</category><category>paranoia</category><category>Marc Laferriere</category><category>canadian flag</category><category>Liberal Party of Canada</category><category>John Baird</category><title>Dump Phil McColeman</title><description>Because Brant's had its fill of Phil</description><link>http://www.dumpphil.ca/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>122</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DumpPhil" /><feedburner:info uri="dumpphil" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-6941242885603316166</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-05-12T14:47:33.415-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dump Phil</category><title>Dump Phil Fan Art</title><atom:summary>From a fan (of this blog, not of Phil):



Dump Phil McColeman



(click photo to enlarge)</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/nSuqQdFA5b8/dump-phil-fan-art.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ITbgOW2uNAY/UY_XGkl9uOI/AAAAAAAAAPQ/cguaQpsnV2c/s72-c/phil_mccoleman.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>3</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/nSuqQdFA5b8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2013/05/dump-phil-fan-art.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-6140678250287253065</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-30T23:21:49.993-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">22-year-old staffers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stephen Harper</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">attack ads</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">respect for taxpayer</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">partisanship</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">partisan spending</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justin Trudeau</category><title>Will Phil waste YOUR tax dollars on attack ads?</title><atom:summary>Wow... we've been quiet on this blog for a while!  That's in part because Phil McColeman has been quiet too.

For example, Phil was quiet when some of his Conservative colleagues spoke out against being muzzled by Prime Minister Harper in the House of Commons.  Did Phil join them?  Absolutely not!  Phil is still repeating the same old drivel that is, in all likelihood, written by 22-year-old </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/SM78WLwmNWA/will-phil-waste-your-tax-dollars-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7ZDTBQXCTi4/UYCF9BF3sjI/AAAAAAAAAO4/T24Dk7fVwww/s72-c/phil_mccoleman_tax_spending.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/SM78WLwmNWA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2013/04/will-phil-waste-your-tax-dollars-on.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-1672223521354186350</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-09T00:13:05.656-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">carbon tax</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bev Oda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">partisanship</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cooperation</category><title> Spirit of Partisanship Stands Out for 2012</title><atom:summary>In a recent Expositor article, Phil McColeman said that he felt that the "spirit of cooperation" characterized his behaviour in 2012. Yeah right. That's like saying that Bev Oda's tenure was marked with respect for the taxpayer. Phil's 2012 was marked with the same non-cooperative, nonproductive partisanship that this blog has been documenting for the past four years.



Phil is part of the </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/fCOe1zxwIlk/spirit-of-partisanship-stands-out-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fMBShFjPgac/UOo-GAS9jDI/AAAAAAAAAOY/mbQPw_o-XyM/s72-c/Phil_McColeman_conservative_MP_Brant.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/fCOe1zxwIlk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2013/01/spirit-of-partisanship-stands-out-for.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-9130388342021667310</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 08:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-10-06T04:43:59.201-04:00</atom:updated><title>Phil McColeman, our National Embarrassment </title><atom:summary>On Canada's national broadcaster, the CBC, Phil McColeman again embarrassed Brant. For those of us who thought that his vote for the anti-choice movement had signified a break from his Dear Leader Stephen Harper, we were mistaken. 

Phil McColeman yesterday spilled this ultra-partisan vitriol in the most hallowed forum we call the House of Commons:


Mr. Speaker, when running
 for his party's </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/UI-_823Ynf8/on-canadas-national-broadcaster-cbc.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/UI-_823Ynf8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/10/on-canadas-national-broadcaster-cbc.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-7681301432414884911</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-09-27T01:04:15.615-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Motion 312</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tea Party</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">abortion</category><title>Phil Votes Against Women's Rights</title><atom:summary>Today, in Ottawa, in the House of Commons, a shameful spectacle unfolded. Phil McColeman, representative for Brant, voted to re-open the abortion debate.

Phil has to realize that he's more than just bumblin' Phil McColeman. His job is to represent his constituents. Phil may be anti-choice personally, and that's okay. We're all entitled to our opinions. But when he takes his personal ideological </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/L3DSGJJoAV4/phil-votes-against-womens-rights.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vfYAL9JVJW8/UGPc7HZEYTI/AAAAAAAAANg/psUOqFQeEMA/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-birth-control.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/L3DSGJJoAV4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/09/phil-votes-against-womens-rights.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-3469116935981702106</guid><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-09-23T15:22:18.392-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">soldiers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MP Pension</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">troops</category><title>Phil Honours Troops by Spending $750,000 to Fight Them in Court</title><atom:summary>As the Globe &amp; Mail reported today, the Conservative government wasted $750,000 of taxpayers' money on legal fees fighting veterans who just want a fair pension.

Phil McColeman often uses military troops and veterans for political posturing – e.g. here, here, here,  here, and here.

But when it comes to paying veterans their fair share, where's Phil?? Probably at the bank deciding how to invest </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/0UOPylXbVdY/phil-honours-troops-by-spending-750000.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BKk59-2Afps/UF9frUELoII/AAAAAAAAANQ/ttnnz1HRE2U/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-soldier-pension.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/0UOPylXbVdY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/09/phil-honours-troops-by-spending-750000.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4403301146351262790</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-09-23T15:18:14.240-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stephen Harper</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">abortion</category><title>Abortion</title><atom:summary>It goes to a vote Wednesday. What will Phil do?? He has three options. He can join the Tea Party caucus of the Conservative party, where we know his heart truly lies. He can oppose the motion and stay loyal to the Dear Leader. Or he can skip the vote together and risk incurring the wrath of whichever side loses (and appear a coward at the same time). This is going to be an exciting week, folks.


</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/HZo6rVjSTbg/abortion.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--3yEX3EIanw/UF1AB935Y9I/AAAAAAAAAMw/R2_-jG9feIY/s72-c/Phil_McColeman_abortion.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>6</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/HZo6rVjSTbg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/09/abortion.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-2629577479125460284</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-13T11:39:06.272-04:00</atom:updated><title>Will Phil Kill Abortion Bill?</title><atom:summary>As noted earlier on DumpPhil.ca, Phil McColeman recently presented six petitions before Parliament asking to re-open the abortion debate. Now, we need to ask: How is Phil going to vote on Motion 312?




Motion 312 is a private member's motion put forward by Phil's Conservative colleague Stephen Woodworth, who hails from neighbouring Kitchener (click here to read Motion 312 on Woodworth's website</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/tNr79S_S0aw/will-phil-kill-abortion-bill.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9MgkKwpUAUA/T6_VIknXUcI/AAAAAAAAAMQ/Lw36bf0lS_I/s72-c/mychoice" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/tNr79S_S0aw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/05/will-phil-kill-abortion-bill.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-5449216629776062248</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-30T18:55:43.089-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">online privacy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">online spying</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bill C-30</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">police powers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">liar liar</category><title>Bil C-30 – Looking Past Phil’s Political Spin</title><atom:summary>Phil McColeman recently wrote an interesting and misleading editorial in the Brant News on Bill C-30, the “online spying” bill that led to the infamous @vickileaks30 Twitter account. Of course, we here at Dump Phil also decry personal attacks of any kind, and we feel that criticism of any politician should be limited to his or her performance as a politician.

Phil is correct when he writes that </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/jjK7ABdxzCE/bil-c-30-looking-past-phils-political.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-m3-DvH_wO4o/T3YBf6q8IiI/AAAAAAAAAMA/J_3fkOx8Ylk/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-online-spying.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/jjK7ABdxzCE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/03/bil-c-30-looking-past-phils-political.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-5653852427350993884</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-15T13:27:42.265-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">women's rights</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">abortion</category><title>Phil McColeman Attempts to Reopen Abortion Debate</title><atom:summary>Yesterday, Phil McColeman stood up in Parliament and said this:
Mr. Speaker, I have six petitions to present from my constituents asking the House of Commons to determine when a fetus becomes a human being.In essence, he was asking the Canadian government to reopen the abortion debate. He did not have to present the petitions, he chose to present the petitions.

The optics of this alone are </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/3U0wqETy4Ic/phil-attempts-to-reopen-abortion-debate.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ldksPSnT5L8/T2Ie18IyIsI/AAAAAAAAAL4/HOrz6IkVT4I/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-bad-idea.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>4</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/3U0wqETy4Ic" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/03/phil-attempts-to-reopen-abortion-debate.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-7108601345176526767</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-04T13:57:07.589-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">scandal</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Front Porch Strategies</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Robo-calls</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Republican Party</category><title>Phil McColeman Used American Robo-call Company</title><atom:summary>Last election, Phil McColeman used Front Porch Strategies, a U.S. robocall company.
We know that Phil McColeman paid Front Porch Strategies during the 2011 election campaign (directly contrary to what Stephen Harper claimed in Parliament). 

We  know that Phil has used Front Porch Strategies to host tele-townhalls.

We now need to know whether Phil also used Front Porch Strategies to call voters.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/4qNiiK5JFDU/phil-mccoleman-used-american-robo-call.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SZW08WajXto/T1O1z7W_cWI/AAAAAAAAALs/-Jqu6TGWqN4/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-Front-Porch-Robocalls.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>4</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/4qNiiK5JFDU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/03/phil-mccoleman-used-american-robo-call.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-6398802071248259096</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-24T11:30:36.279-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Old-Age Security</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cartoon</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MP Pension</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">OAS</category><title>Phreedom 67</title><atom:summary>Here's a great cartoon from the Brant News. It features Phil pretending to care about seniors, while at the same time slashing their Old-Age Security benefits, and hiding his gold-plated MP pension behind his back:


Ironically, Phil just announced that he was in fact holding a town hall on OAS this week. However, he did not post the time and date of the event on the "events" section of his </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/q51qAbODHRo/phreedom-67.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vEe0N4DosIw/T0e4AmXFGqI/AAAAAAAAALc/cRXVrJpj7jc/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-Phreedom-67-Old_Age_Security.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/q51qAbODHRo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/02/phreedom-67.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-648232408956540240</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-22T21:02:37.790-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">retirement</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Old-Age Security</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">seniors</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">OAS</category><title>Phear Mongering on Old Age Security</title><atom:summary>DumpPhil has already written about Phil McColeman's reckless support for the Old-Age Security cuts in this post and this post. Now, Phil is spreading fear around Brantford just like Scarecrow spread fear around Gotham City.


Here's an excellent letter in the Brant News analyzing Phil McColeman's fear mongering:

Phil McColeman ‘fear mongering’: Brison

Brant MP Phil  McColeman was fear mongering</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/fIlbcXsdzsU/phear-mongering-on-old-age-security.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-me9nrpD3FO4/T0WV4pwCXYI/AAAAAAAAALU/OHMgruOmdHU/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-Scarecrow.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/fIlbcXsdzsU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/02/phear-mongering-on-old-age-security.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-6568446473391774992</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-21T21:13:02.008-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Old-Age Security</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">seniors</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">#Occupy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">protest</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">OAS</category><title>#OccupyPhil</title><atom:summary>Phil McColeman's constituency office was occupied by protesters who were suitably upset over his support for cutting Old-Age Security benefits (OAS). The protesters were worried that their retirement would be jeapordized by the OAS cuts. For more details, see articles in the Brantford Expositor and the Brant News.

Phil McColeman, for his part, "made light of the protest". He apparently doesn't </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/kLFzGzX9M90/occupyphil.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZGgslw9H-F0/T0RNkP25iOI/AAAAAAAAALI/nfVECy11wPo/s72-c/Occupy_Phil_McColeman.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/kLFzGzX9M90" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/02/occupyphil.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-1517884656440671014</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-07T22:25:19.505-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mobile</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">QR code</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><title>Going Mobile</title><atom:summary>DumpPhil is now optimized for viewing on your mobile phone!

Simply enter &lt;www.dumpphil.ca&gt; into your mobile device's browser, or scan this QR code:


</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/T7ewBhpDq1A/goin-mobile.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WHcOACAZaf4/TzHp4jR7N_I/AAAAAAAAAK8/i8ZPPHCkScA/s72-c/philll" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/T7ewBhpDq1A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/02/goin-mobile.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-6029447523514672979</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-03T10:15:06.171-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">elderly</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Old-Age Security</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">poverty</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">OAS</category><title>Phil Supports Cuts that Hurt Seniors</title><atom:summary>Phil McColeman defended his government's awful and unnecessary plan to reduce Old-Age Security, a move which could force tens of thousands of senior citizens into poverty. He claimed that his government is "protecting the financial security of seniors now and for future generations", which is, of course, a complete and utter lie.

This isn't the first time that Phil has pretended to care about </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/Ay_sUec5psc/phil-supports-cuts-that-hurt-seniors.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/Ay_sUec5psc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2012/02/phil-supports-cuts-that-hurt-seniors.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-8700137563993306096</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-29T12:01:11.961-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">gun control</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">gun registry</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">logic</category><title>Logic? Never heard of it.</title><atom:summary>Some politicians when making important policy decisions use a mixture of statistics, academic studies, advisory reports and the general public mood at the time. Other politicians base their decisions on isolated anecdotes that go against ALL of the other evidence. Which camp do you think Phil is in?

On October 27, Phil said:
"[W]hen this came before committee, we heard witnesses from the police </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/kPEEdyF8sQU/logic-never-heard-of-it.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Izw_1q-9Rvw/TqwjIYVHQ6I/AAAAAAAAAKs/WIxU9N3nw6Y/s72-c/logic+cartoon.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/kPEEdyF8sQU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/10/logic-never-heard-of-it.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-26530735745925591</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-27T12:19:59.181-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pat Martin</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">New Democratic Party</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Liar</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dump Phil</category><title>Forgetful Phil Wrongly Accuses Another MP of Lying!</title><atom:summary>Yesterday in Ottawa, Phil McColeman called another Member of Parliament (MP) a liar. Phil said:
"Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.

"During question period today, the member for Winnipeg Centre quoted this member as saying something that I categorically did not say. I would like him to table the document that he is referring to where that quote was made, as well as the source and the time </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/5VBltbWpsTg/phils-phorgetful-memory.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/ChJ75g8o_8k/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/5VBltbWpsTg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/10/phils-phorgetful-memory.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4635901565890693412</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-03T01:05:09.063-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dump Phil</category><title>Reflection on the Lack of Dumping Phil</title><atom:summary>Unfortunately for Brant, 30.1% of eligible voters decided to vote for Phil. Sometimes even democracy screws up, even though it's the best system we have.

It was an exciting night, though. Laferriere for a while looked like he was going to have a chance, but then the numbers bounced back blue. Perhaps Laferriere will fight again, next time successfully. Perhaps St. Amand will step aside, </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/Suxe6L9NlYY/reflection-on-lack-of-dumping-phil.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uLJiJUWSK40/Tb-Li6lgsUI/AAAAAAAAAKc/N6qEbQCez44/s72-c/pill.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>6</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/Suxe6L9NlYY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/05/reflection-on-lack-of-dumping-phil.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4515866858730432400</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-02T13:38:51.425-04:00</atom:updated><title>Endorsement Time!  Pass or PHaIL?</title><atom:summary>After talking to residents of Brantford, hearing feedback from the debates,  reading the hundreds of emails that we have received since our first post, and after much deliberation, we have JUST decided that it's time to DUMP PHIL!
Even if Harper gets a majority, Phil would still be a muzzled backbencher and a terrible advocate for his constituents.
If Harper gets a minority, Phil would continue </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/0h-Za68ploM/endorsement-time-pass-or-phail.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/xs8s9UNvglQ/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>9</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/0h-Za68ploM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/05/endorsement-time-pass-or-phail.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-1021782346779717755</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-29T14:45:10.784-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">transgendered rights</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sign</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">campaign office</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bill C-389</category><title>Phil McColeman: Soft on Hate Crime</title><atom:summary>Phil McColeman's views on gender and sexual identity rights are clear: he has publicly stated that he opposes same-sex marriage, and was at one point associated with a coalition lobbying to make same-sex marriage illegal.

Phil McColeman's views on crime are also clear: he supports getting "tough on crime".

So how does Phil feel about hate crime against transgendered people? Answer: he doesn't </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/0sQscPdLymE/phil-mccoleman-soft-on-hate-crime.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-35PNLBTMeKg/TblUVwq5_BI/AAAAAAAAAKU/giJhL9-niVE/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-opposes-equality.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/0sQscPdLymE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-mccoleman-soft-on-hate-crime.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-2308637814672575104</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-26T18:39:57.055-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative Party of Canada</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Member of Parliament</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">shame</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brantford City Council</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wayne Gretzky Sports Centre</category><title>Phil Shirks Responsibility… Again</title><atom:summary>Phil McColeman has insulted Brantford's hard-working city councillors by blaming them entirely for the cost overruns at the Gretzky Centre renovation.

As this blog has repeatedly stated, the cost overruns are almost entirely due to an unreasonably tight deadline on stimulus spending – a deadline implemented by the Conservative government. (For DumpPhil's past coverage of this issue, see "Phil's </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/J4BMp7A9X5s/phil-shirks-responsibility-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-84kqTO7mP1U/TbdIv80Wt_I/AAAAAAAAAKQ/HaNDump3WEk/s72-c/Phil-McColema-not-my-fault.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>7</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/J4BMp7A9X5s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-shirks-responsibility-again.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-4756158794515824680</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-25T02:22:53.875-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">celebration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">100th post</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Member of Parliament</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dump Phil</category><title>Dump Phil Reaches 100!</title><atom:summary>This post marks the 100th entry since DumpPhil started reporting on the poor performance of Phil McColeman. It's quite an achievement. In a little over two years literally thousands of unique readers have visited the blog – on which we have spent $0. We are proud to have raised the level of political awareness and discourse in Brant.

Some of our greatest hits have included "Phil McColeman: Soft </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/5Je7hc78xaw/dumpphilca-reaches-100.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LDOfXnRRh5o/TbUQil-lnOI/AAAAAAAAAKI/Vk7PLK3RPiA/s72-c/Dump-Phil-McColeman-100th-post" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/5Je7hc78xaw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/dumpphilca-reaches-100.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-5556963751704226250</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-25T04:04:26.396-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">debate</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Conservative</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election 41</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">transparency</category><title>Phil Makes the List</title><atom:summary>Phil made the list of Conservative candidates who chickened out of an all-candidates debate!

Brantfordians should be proud. Not only do we have an MP who takes his job for granted, we also have a Prime Minister who is chicken-scared wholesale of talking to the public and the media.

</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/fZ6oxCQ1e1Y/phil-makes-list.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rl7D_3Z_xMo/TbRP9HBz7kI/AAAAAAAAAKA/fFZgyFhOv8w/s72-c/Phil-McColeman-epic-fail.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/fZ6oxCQ1e1Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-makes-list.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8168520749473939348.post-464817352898243256</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-22T17:00:14.190-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">time warp</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Election</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brant Conservatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">oshweken</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">time machine</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lies</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Phil McColeman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">election office</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">time-space continuum</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">water treatment plant</category><title>Phil Does the Time Warp</title><atom:summary>The other day Phil was talking to his boss. He asked his boss to give him credit for doing a good job on a project. The boss responded that the project had been completed before Phil was even hired.

That's basically how the Chamber of Commerce all-candidates debate went down on Wednesday. Phil tried to take credit for funding a new water treatment facility in Ohsweken. Well we here at </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DumpPhil/~3/gOSJUr6PmVQ/phil-does-time-warp_22.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (fordian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TecLGRhwYIk/TbDj-bGyiZI/AAAAAAAAAJ4/IryJ8qKXSoE/s72-c/Screen%2Bshot%2B2011-04-21%2Bat%2B10.10.20%2BPM.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>4</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DumpPhil/~4/gOSJUr6PmVQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.dumpphil.ca/2011/04/phil-does-time-warp_22.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
