E-Reads

A Bank Account for Storing Your Mind

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:00:00 +0000

What is Neurolink? It's a new kind of bank account for storing a person�s mind. You can read it in Coin-Giver, a striking science fiction novel by Philip K. Dick Award winning author M. M. Buckner, about whom Hugo-winning author Robert Sawyer writes, "M.M. Buckner is the first clear-cut new star of twenty-first century SF."

Richter Jedes, the rich powerful CEO of ZahlenBank, wants to live forever - so he makes two copies of himself. One is an evolved Artificial Intelligence imprinted with his personality. The other is a perfect clone named Dominic, whom he raises as his son. When Richter suddenly dies, his son Dominic is left to deal with a terrible crisis which threatens ZahlenBank. And though Dominic loathes the egotistical A.I. masquerading as his father, they need each other�s help to save the bank.

Which of them is the true copy, and which is fake? Do they have free will, or are their destinies programmed in their source code? And most important of all - does individual identity still have any meaning?

Coin-Giver was originally published under the title Neurolink

E-Reads is proud to reissue this extraordinary writer's first three novels. Check them all out. The e-books are available right away and the paperbacks should go on sale shortly. We'll let you know when they do.

RC

Damien Broderick's Quipu Now in Paperback

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:45:00 +0000

We're happy to announce that Damien Broderick's Quipu is available in paperback.

In Quipu Caroline is about to go psychotic - and with her family, no surprise. Joseph can't talk to women even if he is a certified high IQ clever dick trying to take snapshots of the end of the universe. Ray and Marj have their own hassles with in-laws, but student terrorists get in the way. Meanwhile Brian, misogynist and wit, appalls everyone in the quipu world. Quipus? They're the scandalous fanzines that hikes traded before blogs were invented. Hikes? High IQ clever dicks, of course.

In Quipu (appearing for the first time as an E-Reads publication), Australian writer Damien Broderick reimagines his prize-winning 1984 novel Transmitters as the surprising saga of a "family" of genius-level one-of-a-kind individuals.

Damien Broderick is Australia's dean of science fiction, with a body of extraordinary work reaching back to the early 1960's. Like the late George Turner, he captures the distinctive flavor of his native country while reaching out to American and European readers. The White Abacus won two year's best awards. His stories and novels, like those of his younger peer Greg Egan, are drenched with bleeding-edge ideas. Distinctively, he blends ideas and poetry like nobody since Roger Zelazny, and a wild silly humor is always ready to bubble out, as in the cosmic comedy Striped Holes. His award-winning novel The Dreaming Dragons is featured in David Pringle's SF: The 100 Best Novels, and was chosen as year's best by Kingsley Amis. It has been revised and updated as The Dreaming. In 1982, his early cyberpunk novel The Judas Mandala coined the term 'virtual reality.' His most recent novels are Godplayers and K-Machines.

With David G. Hartwell, he edited Centaurus: The Best of Australian SF for Tor in 1999.

Like one of his heroes, Sir Arthur C. Clarke, he is also a master of writing about radical new technologies, and The Spike and The Last Mortal Generation have been Australian popular-science best sellers--both books strongly recommended in Clarke's millennial revision of his famous Profiles of the Future.

"Schr�dinger's Dog" was chosen for Gardner Dozois's SF: Year's Best 14.

His homepage is The Spike, and you can read a great interview with him in Missions Unknown.

Quipu is also available in all popular e-book formats.

Incidentally, E-Reads publishes another book of Broderick, this one in collaboration with Rory Barnes: The Hunger of Time. Check it out!

The Faster His Books Go Down the Crapper, the More Money He Makes

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:45:00 +0000

Bestselling Japanese horror novelist Koji Suzuki has brought out his latest thriller, entitled Drop, on toilet paper rolls, according to the New York Times's Rocky Casale, who reports that a friend of his was so terrified by the story, "she was frightened to be alone in the bathroom." The print job was provided by a company that makes paper products for public restrooms.

If you're wondering how you bookmark the story, Casale explains that "each roll contains several copies of the novella so that you can easily pick up the narrative where you left off."

As a publishing professional I'm in favor of any medium that generates revenue for authors. But Suzuki's story, about a goblin who dwells in a public bathroom, is not going to be of much comfort to those who are already terror-stricken about toilets such as Jody Morse, whose account on the website Associated Content, Toilet Phobia: My Unusual Fear of Toilets, makes some of Stephen King's toe-nibbling under-the-bed imps look absolutely benign by comparison.( Suzuki has been described as the Stephen King of Japan.)

"When I was about four years old, my cousin told me that a scary clown lived in the toilet," Morse explains. Just when she thought she'd outgrown it, a sixth grade health teacher told her class that you can contract pubic lice from public toilet seats. From that point on she did everything she could to avoid going out or from going to the bathroom when she did. The last straw was a nature show portraying how "snakes can crawl up through your pipes and into your toilet. In this case, the snake was some type of Python. Once again, my childhood fear is back.

"After watching this special, I did a little bit of research on how often people find snakes in their toilets. Although I only could find three cases in which families have found snakes (mainly pythons) in their toilets, there are other people who have found other types of animals in their toilets. For example, there was one case in which an iguana climbed into the toilet. In another case, a squirrel, who had also somehow managed to climb up through the pipes, ended up scratching a lady when she sat down on the toilet."

If you think Suzuki's Drop is going to scare the shit out of you, maybe you'd better read it in a library.

RC
Every Blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by the New York Times.

Google Plans to Toss Chrome Through MS's Windows

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:48:00 +0000

A major clash is shaping up on the battlefield called netbooks, the compact, stripped-down, lower priced portable computers that are thriving while larger PCs falter. The combatants are Google and Microsoft, and the prize is dominance over the consumer's choice of operating systems.

It will truly be a clash of titans. Microsoft sits like a Goliath on the throne, but none too securely as Google seeks to unseat Windows. Google's Web browser strategy (which they dub "cloud computing") has caught Microsoft flat-footed in a number of skirmishes but this is nothing less than full-out war because it determines which operating system businesses will choose. So, if you have a storm cellar, proceed to it and stay there until you hear the all-clear.

Google's weapon of choice is called the Chrome Operating System, and two of the company's executives posted a statement on the company's blog characterizing Chrome's virtues as "Speed, simplicity and security," according to Miguel Helft and Ashlee Vance of the New York Times. "Google released Chrome last year, describing it as not only a Web browser but also a tool to let users interact with powerful Web programs like Gmail, Google Docs and online applications created by other companies."

An open-source license a la Linux (or Google's own Android) will enable outside programmers to work their ideas into the OS.

"To combat these efforts," the Times writers point out, "Microsoft began offering its older Windows XP operating system for use on netbooks at a low price. In addition, the company has vowed that its upcoming Windows 7 software, due out this fall, will run well on the tiny laptops, which have stood out as the brightest part of the PC market during the global economic downturn. Microsoft�s current Vista operating system is designed for more powerful machines."

Here's the full story: Google Plans a PC Operating System.

Richard Curtis
Every blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by New York Times.

First Half of '09: Borders Up 820%. No Typo. No Decimal Point. No Kidding.

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:55:00 +0000

In one of the most astounding turnarounds in recent memory, Publishers Weekly's Stock Index soared 23.9% in the first six months of 2009 according to Reed Business Information. The Dow Jones Average for the same period dropped 3.7%.

Leading the recovery from the Death Valley Days of '08's holiday season was Borders. Had you been shrewd enough, or crazy enough, to buy Borders stock at the end of last year when it lay moribund at 40 cents, you'd have been sitting pretty on June 30th with shares valued at $3.68, a bounce of 820%. Other retailers prospered too. Books-A-Million shares rose 178.8% and Barnes & Noble 37.5%. The latter is ironic, given B&N Chairman Len Riggio's lament in November that the holiday season was the worst he'd seen in three decades, and he saw little light in the tunnel for 2009.

It's hard to say what accounts for the rebound. Obviously, financial pundits underestimated the staying power of printed books. That's an understandable error in view of activity in the high-flying e-book sector, which may have instilled Print Is Dead pessimism in investors. Or it may simply be that retailer stocks were simply way underpriced and primed for a correction.

Whatever the explanation, the numbers are encouraging if not inspiring, and we're particularly happy to welcome Borders back to the land of the living. Hey publishers, you can start shipping to Borders again!

Check out the stats in Retailers Enjoy Big Bounce.

RC

Every blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by Reed Business Information and Publishers Weekly.

Google Decides Gmail Works, Drops Beta Notice

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:45:00 +0000

If they told us that the National Academy of Sciences had finally adopted Archimedes' Principle, we could not have been more surprised to learn that Gmail was still in beta until yesterday. Google's fine-print notice that Gmail was still in beta had become so much a part of the screen's landscape that we stopped noticing it. Like the Londoner who awoke with a start one night when Big Ben failed to toll and exclaimed "What the hell was that?", a colleague shouted "Something's wrong!" yesterday when he gazed at his Gmail screen. He finally realized the beta notice had, at long last, disappeared.

What's behind it? Miguel Helft, writing about it in the New York Times, notes that there are two answers. The obvious one, stated by Matthew Glotzbach, a product management director at Google, is that "we haven�t had a consistent set of policies or definitions around beta.�

With Google, however, things are seldom simple or obvious, and Helft sussed out a more cogent underlying motive:"It could help the company�s efforts to get the paid version of Google Apps adopted inside big companies, where Google is trying to compete with rival offerings from Microsoft and others."

The word "compete" must be taken with a grain or two of salt. "Mr. Glotzbach said Google Apps was being used by roughly 1.75 million businesses," Helft writes "though most have little more than a handful of users. In all, Google claims that about 15 million people are using the service and that several hundred thousand of those pay for it at a cost of $50 a year for each user. By comparison, Microsoft Office has more than 450 million paid customers." [italics ours]

In case you failed to notice the removal of Google's beta notice and want to to learn what's behind it, click on After Five Years, Gmail Finally Sheds the �Beta�.

Richard Curtis
Every blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by New York Times.

Photo: Reuters/Jim Young

Inscribe-It: Personalized Paperbacks From E-Reads

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:30:00 +0000

This summer, E-Reads is proud to announce that 20 of our best-selling titles are now available in very special editions where you can order them to be printed with your own unique dedication messages and photos, thanks to the Inscribe-It services by Shared Book�, a new E-Reads distribution partner.

E-Reads uses Shared Book to provide consumers with the opportunity to make their favorite books even more valuable and special through the addition of personalized pages. These custom creations allow the reader's affinity for the book to increase with the new version, an on-demand one-of-a-kind rarity. Simply type your own dedication and upload a picture from your computer when you shop for your book online at our Shared Book print-on-demand webstore.

What does the service cost? Actually, nothing! It's included in the regular price of the book, and they have free shipping in the U.S.!

Among the titles presently available are our best-selling books by Greg Bear, Janet Dailey, Bill Dietz, Dave Duncan, Hannah Howell and John Norman. What are you waiting for? Buy your personalized, one-of-a-kind editions today! (Click here)

Siren Song of Subscription Lures Investors to Their Dooms

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:45:00 +0000

We know that information is gold. But for those who believe they have found a way to sell information that can be accessed for nothing, the ore may be fool's gold. And the list of alchemists trying to do it is pretty impressive: News Corp boss Rupert Murdoch, NBC Universal CEO Jeff Zucker, ACI CEO Barry Diller, MediaNews Group CEO Mary Junck, and a whole host of magazine, press and media lords for whom experience does not seem to have triumphed over cockeyed optimism. Diller categorically assets categorically that "People will pay for content. They always have...I absolutely believe the Internet is passing from its free phase into a paid system."

Jon Fine, blogging in Business Week's MediaCentric online column, describes two new ventures, Journalism Online and ViewPass, whose founders seem confident they can roll back the Information Wants to be Free tide that is swamping the newspaper and magazine businesses. Though he approaches the schemes with some well founded skepticism ("Too good to be true?"), Fine nevertheless sees how a subscription model just might work this time. The key is something called Freemium, which sounds like a blend of gasolines but is actually a blend of concepts:

" The preferred terms du jour describe "premium" offerings, or even, forgive them, 'freemium,' given the blend of free and paid. The dream dancing through some executives' heads involves a hybrid model: maintaining much or all existing free traffic while charging some subscribers fees for certain offerings, then using data from these users' browsing habits to help sell ultra-targeted -- and thus higher-priced -- advertising."

Fine points out that for any of these "moonshots" (his word) to work, "publishers would have to agree on a platform, consumers would have to use it, and then, most importantly, companies would have to buy ads." What he leaves out is the most important condition of all: ironclad security against the predations of hackers and file-sharing freemongers. If a digital illiterate can penetrate a subscription website (see A Google-Fu Master Unlocks the Wall Street Journal. Or, How I Know Subscription Model Won't Work), what can an army of determined geeks accomplish?

Nevertheless, we wish these enterprising business men and woman success and godspeed. I have instructed my stockbroker to buy shares in the first newspaper or magazine that can demonstrate a truly foolproof subscription model. As he's fond of reminding me, though, there are an awful lot of fools out there.

RC
Every blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by Business Week.
Painting by Herbert James Draper

Can't Sue for Libel in US? Take Your Beef to Britain, Libel Capital of the World

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:49:00 +0000

Next time you visit London, if you have an hour or two after visiting London Bridge, Westminster Palace and Big Ben, drop by a solicitor's office and sue someone for libel. It will more than pay for the cost of your vacation.

When you do, you'll be participating in the blood sport known as libel tourism, a legal ploy so appalling that victims have described it as a form of terrorism.

What's it all about? "Unlike in the United States, where plaintiffs have to prove that the defendant's statement is willfully false and defamatory," writes Salil Tripathi in Wall Street Journal Europe, "the burden of proof is reversed in Britain. According to U.K. libel laws, the plaintiff has to show only that the statement harms his reputation -- which is the case with almost any accusation, true or false. It is the defendant who must then prove that his allegations were not libelous."

Because of this radical difference between the British (guilty until proven innocent) and American (innocent until proven guilty) approaches to libel, American authors and publishers and their lawyers have deliberately withheld UK publication rights to many books that might give offense to rich and/or powerful persons or entities that might bring a lawsuit in a British court. If you have any doubts that this is a sword hanging over the neck of every author and journalist, some examples will erase them. You can find them in Tripathi's article or this one in the New York Times, Britain, a destination for "libel tourism" by Doreen Carvajal.

If you're wondering why I've refrained from identifying the plaintiffs it's because, frankly, I'm afraid of being sued. This blog is read worldwide and it's all too likely that some litigious bastard who objects to being called - well, a litigious bastard - would take offense and haul me into a British court, tie me up for years and bankrupt me with legal bills (including the plaintiff's) and damages.

So, you see, this cruel, stupid and toxic provision of English law has done its job on me, just as it will do on you should you venture over the line. And what does "venture over the line" mean? It means that if even a single copy of your US edition finds its way to English soil, you're potentially liable.

Recently, two New York State officials proposed a bill that would render foreign libel judgments unenforceable "unless," as it was reported, "the country in which they are made had free speech protections similar to the First Amendment." And the New York Times ran an editorial supporting such a measure. "If authors believe they are too vulnerable," the editorial concluded, "they may be discouraged from taking on difficult and important topics, like terrorism financing, or from writing about wealthy and litigious people. That would not only be bad for writers, it would be bad for everyone."

The citizens of our nation have made terrible sacrifices, include the shedding of their blood, to defend our Constitutionally guaranteed right of free speech. That a foreign country, let alone the very one in which the foundations of democracy were forged, could have a license to reach into our homes and workplaces and deprive us of our most sacred right is intolerable and unconscionable. I wish I could say it is also unimaginable, but in fact this outrage is being perpetrated on our countrymen - on your fellow authors - as I write this. Every writer, agent and publisher organization must combat it. The British laws that foster this disgrace must be repealed. What is the Authors Guild, the American Publishers Association, the Association of Authors' Representatives, the American Civil Liberties Union, PEN and other rights organizations doing about it?

Richard Curtis

Every Blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times.

Mutant Pirates Test a Space Diplomat's Skills to the Limit

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:50:00 +0000

Thousands of years in the future, Paula Mendoza, an adventurous woman diplomat from Earth, takes on mutant space pirates in an effort to bring peace to the solar system. Devious and practical, she plunges herself into the mutant world, where people like her are slaves and brute force is everything, and triumphs by her wits. Cecilia Holland's Floating Worlds, first published in 1976 and heavily influenced by the Cold War, still reads like right now, in the clash of personal ambition and cultural values, the underhanded politics and the threat of a collapsing environment.

RC

A Posy of Western Romances by Heidi Betts

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:13:00 +0000

Heidi Betts began her love affair with the romance genre in junior high school, where she used to sneak romance novels into study hall when she should have been doing her homework. It didn't take long to decide she wanted to write a few romances of her own, so she set out to do just that. Her first book, Cinnamon and Roses, was released by Dorchester Publishing in January 2000, with five more western historicals following in the next three years. E-Reads is happy to bring them all back to you, both as e-books and paperbacks.

In Cinnamon and Roses, Caleb Adams find himself out of Rebecca's league. She's a fatherless seamstress with no business in the wealthy, extravagant city life of Caleb. Yet, the more he scandalizes her small Kansas cowtown, the more she pines for his raw male allure. Now Caleb finds himself less interested in the beautiful rich women of his past and more obsessed with Rebecca's innocent scent of cinnamon and roses. Will her fear of mothering a baby doomed to a fatherless upbringing and his fear of entrusting his heart to women be erased when their mutual desire is fulfilled?

In December 2003 Heidi began writing her sexy contemporary romances for Silhouette's Desire line, and last year she launched a delightful trilogy of contemporaries for St. Martins. Visit her website HeidiBetts.com.

Is Gazing at Your Blackberry Grounds for Divorce?

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:45:00 +0000

Let's test your RQ - your rudeness quotient. On a scale of 1= No Problem and 10=Hanging at Dawn Without Benefit of a Trial, rate the following:

You go to a business lunch and your dining companion puts a BlackBerry on the table and checks it compulsively throughout the meal.
While you're conducting a seminar you notice that half the attendees are staring at smartphones and some are working them with their thumbs.
You're out on a date and you reach out to grasp your lover's hand, but there's a cell phone in it.
Your wife is discussing resort plans for your second honeymoon. She asks you something important. You ask her to repeat what she said because you were too absorbed checking fantasy baseball scores on your Palm Pre.
The bored concertgoer beside you is checking his email during a tender pianissimo passage of your favorite symphony.

These vignettes exemplify an evolving crisis in etiquette prompted by a new generation of smartphones and other handheld communication devices. New York Times reporter Alex Williams has chronicled the challenge of holding the social fabric together while gamers, bloggers, tweeters, and email checkers succumb to the temptation, if not the compulsion, to indulge their private pursuits in public.

Obviously your RQ depends on which side of the device you're on. "A spirited debate about etiquette has broken out" Williams writes. "Traditionalists say the use of BlackBerrys and iPhones in meetings is as gauche as ordering out for pizza. Techno-evangelists insist that to ignore real-time text messages in a need-it-yesterday world is to invite peril." Like it or not, the field is tilting in the direction of the techno-evangelists. Williams reports that a third of some 5300 workers pulled by a job listings website said "they frequently checked e-mail in meetings." However, out of those that do, "Nearly 20 percent said they had been castigated for poor manners regarding wireless devices."

You may be lucky to get away with mere castigation. Employees have been fired when caught using their device frivolously. Business leaders instruct attendees to turn off all electronic devices at meetings on pain of ostracism or worse, and visitors to President Obama's Oval Office are required to leave their BlackBerrys with his secretary (though its well known the President himself is addicted to his). Fistfights have broken out in theaters over cellphones ringing at critical moments in a performance.

And inappropriate use of a device can be fatal. A growing number of car crashes involved drivers talking on cellphones or looking at text message screens, and these practices are being banned in several states. A fatal train accident in California was traced to the engineer's being distracted by text messages.

And concentration on the screen of your gadget instead of the eyes of your beloved is wreaking havoc in relationships and can contribute to breaking up. On the other hand, if you're determined to break up with someone, a cell phone can come in handy. A Malaysian government official notified his wife that he was divorcing her - via cell phone. (An Islamic court overruled him, but nice try, huh?)

You can read both sides of the debate in Mind Your BlackBerry or Mind Your Manners. Then let's review the score on our RQ quiz. How'd you do?

Richard Curtis

Every blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by the New York Times.

Authors: Are Your Readers Zoning Out on You? It May Not Be Your Fault

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:43:00 +0000

Like many publishing professionals I've trained myself to step outside of my mind while I read a manuscript and monitor the intensity of my involvement in the work. In a perfect reading experience my disbelief, in the famous phrase of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, will be willingly suspended from beginning to end and I will never become conscious that there is a world outside of the one I am reading about. Unfortunately, perfect reading experiences are as rare as perfect experiences in every other field of endeavor.

And so, sooner or later as I turn the pages of a manuscript, I will become aware of a police siren or the sound of a television program in the next room, and the spell of the book I'm reading will be broken. If it's a good book I'll plunge back in and soon lose myself again. If it isn't, my monitor will sound with growing frequency. I will make a mental note of the places where my attention flagged so that I can help the author analyze where he or she lost me.

Non-professional readers - the public at large, that is - may not have the same powers of self-observation, but they have little trouble speaking up when a book fails to hold their attention. "Boring." "Couldn't finish it." "Put it down, never picked it up again."

In most cases the responsibility for failure to keeping readers interested rests with the author. But not always. An article by Carl Zimmer in Discover magazine informs us that distractability is far more normal than we may realize. Zimmer cites an experiment conducted by a team of University of California Santa Barbara psychologists led by Jonathan Schooler. The test had to do with a book, and not just any book: "In 2005 he and his colleagues told a group of undergraduates to read the opeing chapters of War and Peace on a computer monitor and then to tap a key whenever they realized they were not thinking about what they were reading. On average, the students reported that their minds wantered 5.4 times in a 45-minute session."

Wandering minds are one things, but zoning out completely is quite another. Here's what Schooler and his colleagues discovered:

"Schooler and Smallwood, along with Merrill McSpadden of the University of British Columbia, tested the effect of zoning out by having a test group read a Sherlock Holmes mystery in which a villain used a pseudonym. As people were reading the passages discussing this fact, the researchers checked their state of attentiveness. Just 30 percent of the people who were zoning out at the key moments could give the villain�s pseudonym, while 61 percent of the people who weren�t zoning out at those moments succeeded."

One of the most striking discoveries repoat imbibing a moderate amount of alcohol actually sharpened concentration. However, before you reach for the vodka bottle, note that there is evidence that a wandering mind offers many significant benefits. "The regions of the brain that become active during mind wandering belong to two important networks," Zimmer explains. "One is known as the executive control system. Located mainly in the front of the brain, these regions exert a top-down influence on our conscious and unconscious thought, directing the brain�s activity toward important goals."

"The other regions belong to another network called the default network. In 2001 a group led by neuroscientist Marcus Raichle at Washington University discovered that this network was more active when people were simply sitting idly in a brain scanner than when they were asked to perform a particular task. The default network also becomes active during certain kinds of self-referential thinking, such as reflecting on personal experiences or picturing yourself in the future."

So, next time you find your mind drifting off while reading a book, it is appropriate for you to ask yourself whether it's the author's fault for failing to keep you involved; or is it, rather, just you reflecting on a matter of great importance or solving a problem you couldn't master before you started reading.

For the full story, read Stop Paying Attention: Zoning Out Is a Crucial Mental State.

Richard Curtis

Every Blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by Discover magazine.

How Swede It is! Pirate Site Sold, New Owners Vow To Go Legit

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:48:00 +0000

Global Gaming Factory has acquired buccaneer file-sharing website The Pirate Bay, whose operators were sentenced to fines and jail terms after being convicted of copyright infringement. Both companies are Swedish.

The price is close to $8 million. The fines levied on the four owners of the pirate site totaled $14 million, suggesting that crime does pay but not enough to cover losses. The pirates generated enough public sympathy to win a seat in the Swedish legislature, however.

Eric Pfanner, writing in the New York Times, reports that the new owners hope "to turn it into a legal source of free music, movies and other content, using a novel, untested business model." The model? "He envisions charging Internet service providers. The Pirate Bay could also generate revenue from advertising." The new company's owner assures us there will be no further violation of copyrights: �'It has to be legal from Day 1,'� says Hans Pandeya. �'We are on the stock market; we can�t start playing games.'�

Well, Mr. Pandeya, as the old Swedish proverb goes, lots of luck.

RC

Every Blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by the New York Times.

William C. Dietz's Words for Hire #3 - Publishers

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:52:00 +0000

William C. Dietz is the best-selling author of more than thirty novels, some of which have been reissued by E-Reads. Recently he was invited by the SFWA (Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America) Bulletin to write a bi-monthly column called "Words for Hire," exploring the world of media tie-ins and novelizations. The articles demystify a fascinating genre and we're delighted to reprint them as a regular feature in these pages.
RC
******************************
William C. Dietz introduces his third column:

My last two columns were focused on the ultimate source of most tie-in work: the film, television and gaming industries which typically create and produce the properties that novelizations and tie-ins are based on. Now it�s time to consider the publishers who purchase the rights and produce the actual books.
Continue here.

When an Alien Says "We're Doing This for You", Start Running

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:45:00 +0000

The alien Holn come in peace - and stay for six years. Never leaving their ship, they remain a mystery, communicating only with scientists. Then, as abruptly as they arrived, they depart, leaving behind a wealth of knowledge ... and something more.

Seventeen human adults had entered the Holn vessel. And now they have reemerged as nine-year-old children � their emotions, maturity and memories intact � returning to adult lives irreparably shattered by the aliens' incomprehensible �gift.� Devils or angels, prophets or infiltrators, who are they really and what is their purpose?

Soon the world will know...

And so will you when you read Terry England's Rewind. Now available both as a download and paperback.

"...a fascinating, thought-provoking novel, and certainly one of the more promising debuts I've seen in some time."
--Science Fiction Chronicle

After 35 Years, John Norman's Imaginative Sex Available Again

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Curtis) — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:00:00 +0000

For decades the fictional world of Gor has been John Norman's testing and proving ground for his advanced but controversial principles of relations between male and female. Thirty-five years ago Norman produced Imaginative Sex, a guide revealing his vision and describing those principles and the philosophy behind them. Unfortunately, as social and publishing mores shifted toward the reactionary, that book fell out of favor, and there it has lain - until now. If you're interested in learning how Norman's books were marginalized before being restored to their current place of honor in the world of fantasy and science fiction, you can read about it in Are John Norman's Gors "Boy-Books"?

E-Reads is proud to restore Imaginative Sex both to yearning devotees and to a new generation of Norman fans. It's available now for download and paperback.

The titles of the first nine chapters include"Imaginative Sex: The New Sexual Revolution", "Love, Hunters and Evolution," "Marriage, Sex and Normality," "Sex and the Brain," "Marriage and the Ventilation of Emotions," "Privacy," "Disease," "Requirements for Imaginative Sex," and "Imaginative Techniques."

Norman details and develops his theories and ideas about sex in the modern age, and in the tenth chapter, "Sensuous Fantasies: Recipes for Pleasure" he presents fifty-three scenarios designed to reintroduce fantasy and intimacy to the bedroom. Examples include "The Aphrodisiac Fantasy"; "The Rites-of-Submission Fantasy"; "The Lady Fantasy"; "The I-Am-His-Slave-Girl Fantasy"; "The Safari Fantasy" and "The Blindfolded-Lovers Fantasy" as well as many other sensuous suggestions, detailed for the enjoyment of all truly adult readers. Find out what really lies behind the philosophy of Gor and the ways in which role playing can enhance everyone's love life.

And anyone interested in John Norman and his magical world of Gor is invited to visit The Chronicles of Gor website.

RC

Can You Be Sued for Clicking?

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:45:00 +0000

When I was a young man apprenticing at a literary agency, our boss sent me and several fellow staffers on a confidential mission to the offices of a prominent and flamboyant publisher. His company had just published a novel represented by our agency. The publisher handed us envelopes containing cash and instructed us to visit one of several large New York City bookstores and buy a copy of the book. We were then to bring our copy back to his offices, go to another store and do the same. And again and again until we had spent all the cash. The object, he explained, was to inflate sales figures and put the book on the bestseller list. The ploy succeeded.

This little piece of chicanery came to mind when I read a New York Times story by Stephanie Clifford that Microsoft had brought a civil lawsuit in the United States District Court in Seattle against a number of individuals and corporations that Microsoft alleged had manipulated clicks on an Internet ad. The corporation is seeking at least $750,000 in damages. What exactly did these folks purportedly do to incur MS's wrath?

The offense is called click fraud. Fraud is broadly defined as deliberate deception committed either for personal gain or to damage someone else. It's a serious tort (violation of civil law) for which one can be sued, or a serious crime for which one can go to jail, or both.

The Microsoft case has to do with the way companies measure their ads' exposure to viewers who are potential buyers of the advertised products and services. The effectiveness is gauged in cost her click. Clifford cites an outfit called Click Forensics as asserting that "about one in every seven clicks on an advertisement is estimated to be fraudulent." If the dodge is so commonplace, why would anyone spend a lot of money suing? "Microsoft is trying to make that kind of deception more expensive for perpetrators," says Clifford. Making an example of click fraudsters, in other words.

Here's how the reporter explains what happened.

"Advertisers bid on what they will pay to appear in the paid-search results for certain key words. The more an advertiser pays, the higher they are on the list, and advertisers usually pay for each click on their ad.

"In March 2008 several audo insurance advertisers began complaining to Microsoft that traffic to their ads was spiking suspiciously...And clicks to the advertisers appearing at the top of the paid-search results listings for those terms were high. Although traffic appeared to come from different computers, it was actually coming from two proxy servers, which mask the original address of a click."

Clearly, if the charges stick they will show that this was not a bunch of students in a dorm room earning beer money for repeatedly stroking "Enter" on their keyboards, but rather powerful robot servers that MS investigators tracked to various accounts registered to the defendants. The complaint stated that one of them "directed traffic to competitors' Web sites so [Microsoft}] would pay for those clicks and exhaust their advertising budgets quickly, which let the lower-ranking sites that he sponsored move up in the paid-search results," writes Cliffor. You can read more about the investigation and lawsuit here.
Click fraud is as old as the Internet, according to Stefanie Olsen, writing in 2004 for CNET News. "The practice...began in the early days of the Internet's mainstream popularity with programs that automatically surfed Web sites to increase traffic figures. This led companies to develop policing technololgies touted as antidotes to the problem."

Nor is Microsoft the first company to take action over click fraud. "In one recent example of the problem," Olsen wrote in 2004, "law enforcement officials say a California man created a software program that he claimed could let spammers bilk Google out of millions of dollars in fraudulent clicks. Authorities said he was arrested while trying to blackmail Google for $150,000 to hand over the program." Considering that advertising is the foundation for Google's fortunes, it will come as no surprise that the firm has taken the most stringent actions to protect itself. Olsen quotes a statement issued by Google that it has been "the target of individuals and entities using some of the most advanced spam techniques for years. We have applied what we have learned with search to the click fraud problem and employ a dedicated team and proprietary technology to analyze clicks." Olsen called it the "Google Fraud Squad."

Though click fraudsters are fiendishly clever and possess powerful tools and weapons, the good guys are well armed to combat them. You can visit the website of the Click Fraud Network, "a community of online advertisers, agencies and search providers working together to develop an industry solution to the click fraud problem. Network members that provide data to the network receive free access to online campaign and risk assessment reports." Among other services the Network offers are a "Click Fraud Index�" tracking click fraud rates by quarter and even a "Click Fraud Heatmap."

Though the commercial reasons for such aggressive warfare are plain, there's another less obvious but extremely important one. As newspapers and magazines desperately fight for their lives, they are turning to online advertising as a possible key to salvation. If the metrics are unreliable, however, that door will be closed to those industries. Says Tom Cuthbert, president and CEO of Click Forensics, the company sponsoring the Click Fraud Network, �Click fraud activity continues to grow especially on made for ad sites, parked domains and on the content networks. Advertisers, publishers and search engines need to take notice because content networks are becoming the fastest growing source of click fraud. Ensuring their quality is essential for the pay per click advertising market to continue its growth.�

Looking back at that bit of skullduggery committed by the publisher years ago, I wonder if, today, we would have been asked to perpetrate some variety of click fraud to boost his book's fortunes. Knowing what I've just learned about the consequences, I'm certain I'd think long and hard before I started clicking.

Richard Curtis

Every Blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers and magazines. This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by the New York Times.

He's Not a Headcase. He Really Can Manipulate Space and Time

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:15:00 +0000

E-Reads has just released The Martian Viking, Tim Sullivan's saga of a man with a mighty hallucination.

Hallucination - or time travel? Whichever way you see it, it's one man alone against the cosmos, creating his own reality. Exiled on Mars, Johnsmith Biberkopf escapes from a penal colony on the Red Planet and learns that his hallucinations are real - space and time can be manipulated. Kidnapped by Vikings who've sailed through the continua since ancient times, Johnsmith embarks on an epic adventure, an infinite journey through the multiverse. Facing alien menace, he learns the terrifying truth about the power of illusion!

If you like The Martian Viking, check E-Reads' other Tim Sullivan title, The Parasite War. Both titles are available in e-book and print formats.

Here's One Colloid You Don't Want to Be Suspended In

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:13:00 +0000

In Tim Sullivan's The Parasite War, a combat veteran leads a rag-tag group of survivors in an all-out war against invading aliens. The world's cities have been destroyed by a ghastly holocaust from space. The few remaining souls eke out an existence in the ruins, ransacking skyscrapers for food, and living in the city's sewers like vermin. Alex Ward, a man who has lost everything, and a beautiful woman named Jo, unite the survivors to battle the slithering menace of the Colloids, parasites whose seed has drifted through space for millions of years in search of the perfect world for their depredations: Earth. When Alex and Jo discover the Colloids' ultimate biological purpose, the motley band of guerrillas are put to the test in a monstrous battle for the future of mankind!

The Parasite War is available both as a download and paperback.

And check out another Sullivan E-Reads release, The Martian Viking.

The Next Goldrush? MultiTouch Screen Apps

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:00:00 +0000

The Holy Grail of screen technology is the gesture-activated virtual screen portrayed in Stephen Spielberg's 2002 blockbuster futuristic film Minority Report. Technologists inspired by the brilliant effects have been laboring ever since to interact with screen images, getting them to do what we want them to do by a mere wave of the hand or point of an index finger.

The iPhone's introduction of multitouch was an astounding innovation that brought Spielberg's vision closer to actualization. But the Apple device still requires physical contact with the surface of the device, whereas the next generation of virtual screens will liberate our hands from any contact whatsoever.

Where are we on the continuum between touchscreens and Minority Report's magic one?

Rebounding from an Apple-led consumer flight to handhelds, a number of PC manufacturers are developing applications designed to lure consumers back to their desks and, according to Ashlee Vance of the New York Times (PC Touch Screens Move Ahead), high on the list are touchscreens. For instance, Hewlett-Packard is pushing the TouchSmart, a desktopper with an upright screen on which you can access every function with your stylus or index finger. TouchSmart offers a variety of great applications. Vance points out that "Customers can turn these machines into bespoke kiosks for, say, ordering merchandise at a sporting event or flipping through a menu while waiting at a restaurant." Indeed, touch screens are commonly used for keeping track of tables and food orders at restaurants. They can also be embedded in homes to control lights, music, thermostat, etc., and in he kitchen to follow recipes.

However, after you've worked an iPhone screen with multitouch, one-finger functionality feels pretty limited, and we have to wonder how practical the TouchSmart approach is for business offices. Here's a simple test: next time you're sitting in front of your desktop monitor, try stretching your arm out and poking the screen every time you want to open a file, drag, drop, highlight, cut and paste or perform some other task. Do we really want to reach out to our screen every time we want to move something around or shift to another function? Don't be surprised if your arm grows weary and your back strained. Let's face it: some functions are best left to keyboard commands or mouse navigation. And - sitting at a desk is not necessarily where today's sedentary or peripatetic computer users want to be. If you're thinking about students, so am I. We'll get to them in a moment.

You can google lots of HP promotional videos and demonstrations and decide for yourself.

But soon, even five digits may be pass�. Enter advanced multitouch and an Israeli outfit called N-trig. Its advanced PC screen technology called "DuoSense" enables users to use both hands as well as a pen.

N-trig is the only industry provider to offer a combined pen, touch and multi-touch solution, having overcome the technological hurdles of combining the two seamlessly in a single device. DuoSense is an intelligent digitizer, fully compatible with Microsoft natural input standards. N-trig's DuoSense digitizers are are easily integratable, support any type of LCD, keep devices slim, light and bright, can support numerous applications, and can be implemented in a broad range of products ranging from small notebooks to large LCDs.

For a cool demo check out this video of N-trig. By the way, if you're fascinated by the possibilities and have some clever ideas of your own for Windows 7 apps, N-Trig offers a $900 touchscreen kit that software developers that can use to develop their own.

Note that N-trig's demonstration is being performed on a tablet computer, as well as on a convertible laptop/slate. Why tablets? Aren't they just a niche? So far, yes. But that's going to change big time. There's a whole population of computer users that is simply not deskbound. It's called students, and, as we have stated in these pages again and again, the only viable computer product for students is the tablet. "Textbooks and other illustrated books simply cannot be crammed into anything smaller than a screen close to the size of a laptop," I wrote. "Tablets have all the virtues of laptops PLUS touchscreen functionality. For students, reading books on an e-reading device is highly desirable but not as imperative as the ability to handwrite notes on their device's screen."

Students will certainly give N-trig's DuoSense two thumbs up, plus the other eight digits as well. "Such touch software can handle lots of fingers hitting a screen at once rather than just relying on one or two digits, as most of today�s touch screens do," writes Vance.

In anticipation of a major push into the tablet market, Microsoft is reported to have invested $24 million in N-trig, and the forthcoming Windows 7 (look for it in 2010) "supports gestures such as pinching and fingertip scrolling,"reports Wired. "Other Windows programs, such as Paint, will also include new brushes designed for multi-touch and features such as panning across a page in Internet Explorer." But the outer limits of known touchscreen tech is Microsoft Surface's Cynergy Labs, and it's likely that Surface will dominate the field until 3D replaces it. Check out these dumfounding videos.

Microsoft's Surface is probably the direction consumers will go over the next few years, but shimmering on the distant horizon is a means of projecting action onto a screen without any contact whatever. We caught a glimpse of this with the wearable "Sixth Sense" device demonstrated at a recent TED (Technology Entertainment Design) conference. But for a mind-bending look at the state of the art of virtual, check out Project Natal by Microsoft designed for XBox 360. Stephen Spielberg, eat your heart out.

Richard Curtis

This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by the New York Times. Every blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers. Without them our free society would not only be impoverished but imperiled. We must strive to find a way to rescue the industry, even if it means nothing more than buying a paper on the street. Support your local newspaper.

Losing Bidder in Cheney Book Auction Offers Advice to Winner Matalin

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:45:00 +0000

Ms. Mary Matalin
Threshold Editions
c/o Simon & Schuster

Dear Mary Matalin:

Richard Curtis here, CEO of E-Reads, the publishing company that made what we thought was an irresistible offer to Dick Cheney to publish his book. In case you missed our proposal you may read it here.

But I don't want to sound like a sore loser. If I had to lose a bidding war, I'm relieved it's to you. I was terrified it might end up with Harper, who would probably do the same kind of trashy treatment they did for Peggy Noonan's The Case Against Hillary Clinton, with those made-up internal monologues and transcriptions of speeches Hillary never made. At least I can be confident that your approach to the Cheney book will be utterly responsible, something along the lines of your superb editorial job on Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation.

You described that book as "a piece of scholarship, and a good one at that," and I could not agree more. Your impeccable vetting of Barack Obama's extensive connections with Islam and radical politics, his Communist and socialist mentors, his close associations with members of the Weather Underground, his involvement in the slum-landlord empire of a notorious Chicago political fixer - well, Mary (if I may), reading that meticulously documented work was an inspiring reminder of why I went into the publishing business.

Nevertheless, I hope you will not be afraid to be stern in your dealings with Cheney. If there's one thing I know about him, it's that he has the utmost respect for those who hold people's feet to the fire.

I realize that my role as underbidder for the Cheney book does not entitle me to any special consideration. Nevertheless, I am happy to share with you some of the suggestions I made to Mr. Cheney in my original pitch to him, and I hope you'll adopt them. For what it's worth, here's what I think Cheney needs to discuss to make this book a blockbuster international bestseller:

How he helped President Bush to deceive Congress and the American people into buying into a connection between Al Qaeda and the Iraq government under Saddam Hussein
How he misrepresented available intelligence
How he outed covert intelligence officer Valerie Plame and got his Chief of Staff Scooter Libby to take the fall
How he steered no-bid government contracts to Halliburton, a company in which he has a multimillion dollar interest that has appreciated by thousands of percent since the war began
How he undermined the Constitution
How he suspended the right of Habeas Corpus
How he subverted the rule of law
How he instituted secret wiretapping and email monitoring of American citizens
How he scammed America's allies with Saddam's "weapons of mass destruction"
How he created a secret cabal of oil and other energy lobbyists
How he sent thousands of young men and women to death and maiming in the prosecution of a "phony" war whose real goal was to exploit Middle East oil
How he leveraged his office to create a policy of torture and brutality

Do these correspond to your own ideas? Have I missed anything?

Also, since it's no longer of any use to us, I might as well give you the title that we'd planned to put on the book had we won the auction:

GO FUCK YOURSELF
My Life in High Crimes and Misdemeanors
by Dick Cheney

What do you think, Mary? Is that a winning title or what?

I invite you to reply to this open letter and I promise to promote your response in the widest public forum.

Yours truly,

Richard Curtis
President and CEO
E-Reads

When Readers Digest From Web, What's Reader's Digest To Do?

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:00:00 +0000

How is Reader's Digest gonna keep 'em down on the farm after they've seen gawker, ew.com, espn.com, and Huffpo? So far, the 87-year-old RD can't, and its declining fortunes and circulation confirm it. The New York Times's Stephanie Clifford points out that "Reader�s Digest is decreasing its circulation to 5.5 million from 8 million and lowering its frequency to 10 times a year from 12." That's down from a circulation of 17 million at the height of it popularity.

The rural, middle class Just Folksy readership that fueled the publication's dominant position in the magazine industry, has gone young, urban, savvy, wired, college educated and - gulp! - liberal. Clifford says that in order to cling to its diminishing base, RD has to give its content and viewpoint a rightward spin. �It�s traditional, conservative values: I love my family, I love my community, I love my church,� Clifford quotes Mary Berner, Reader�s Digest Association's president and CEO. "The project that signals Reader�s Digest�s future, Ms. Berner said, is a new multifaceted effort produced with Rick Warren, the evangelical pastor, called the Purpose Driven Connection." Is that conservative enough for you, Mr. and Mrs. Middle America?

Among the behemoth's holdings are such magazines as Every Day With Rachael Ray and The Family Handyman, which some may think corny. Or, as Berner commented, �They are brands that may not be considered cool by the often elitist and self-absorbed standards of New York media."

Berner herself seems to have passed muster with the representative of the elitist New York medium that interviewed her: "She had taken a car from Manhattan that morning, and wore a pink wool shirt-dress, patent leather Manolo Blahnik heels, and diamond hoop earrings," writes Clifford.

You can read about it in Reader�s Digest Searches for a Contemporary Niche.

RC
This posting relies on original research and reporting performed by the New York Times. Every blogger owes a debt of gratitude to newspapers. Without them our free society would not only be impoverished but imperiled. We must strive to find a way to rescue the industry, even if it means nothing more than buying a paper on the street. Support your local newspaper.

Pearson to Help Schwarzenegger Pump Digits in CA Textbook Initiative

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:00:00 +0000

There's some followup news of note on our story of last week, Hasta La Vista, Textbooks.

After Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger complained about the cost of print textbooks, which is adding to his state's astronomical budget deficit, and joked about using heavy print editions to build muscles, international media giant Pearson took him up on his call for a e-book substitutes in science and math. Pearson is a world leader in education, business information and consumer publishing (they own Penguin Books, for example).

Craig Morgan Teicher of Publishers Weekly reports that Peter Cohen, Pearson�s CEO of North America school curriculum business, stated,�We believe it is important to take these forward steps toward an online delivery system and we are supporting the Governor�s initiative, recognizing there are numerous challenges ahead for the education community to work through.�

The changeover will not be achieved with a snap of the fingers. The California�s Free Digital Textbook Initiative spells out a number of the challenges that Pearson's Cohen alludes to.

The California Learning Resource Network (CLRN) is responsible for reviewing these materials to verify that they are aligned to the California content standards. Qualifying mathematics courses include geometry, algebra II, trigonometry, or calculus. The science materials must be aligned to the standards for physics, chemistry, biology/life sciences, or earth sciences, including the investigation and experimentation strand. Digital textbooks should approach or equal a full course of study and must be downloadable.

Above is a photo of the Governor before his state's financial woes bowed his shoulders.

RC

Bestselling Kindle Newbie Ready to Share Secrets of Success as Soon as He Knows What They Are

noreply@blogger.com (E-Reads) — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:40:00 +0000

J. A. Konrath identifies himself as the author of three thrillers featuring Lt. Jacqueline "Jack" Daniels (that's not him pictured at right). He has also published two works of horror under the penname Jack Kilborn, a full-lengther plus a novella in collaboration with Blake Crouch.

He uploaded his books to Kindle (as well as to some other e-book outlets) and has compiled a fascinating account of the experience, studded with precise sales information and embellished with invaluable tips to writers seeking to emulate him.

First and foremost, his horror novel Afraid, irresistibly priced at $1.99, sold over 10,400 copies in the first month of its release. The novella, Serial, was released free a month later and was downloaded by Kindlach ( people of the Kindle) over 34,000 times. Grand Central, which issued print editions, assisted with online promotion.

Konrath then posted some of his other books on Kindle. You can read about his strategies for pricing, product description, networking and other strategies on his blogpost A Newbie's Guide to Publishing. He shares some pertinent observations plus do's and don'ts. But when it comes to penetrating the mystery of why some of his books sell more units than others, he confesses to being clueless:

What I've learned about units sold: Nothing. I have no clue why The List, which is a fun technothriller about cloning, is outselling Origin, which is about a secret government compound studying Satan.

Welcome to book publishing, rookie. You're in good company. Even the preeminent Alfred A. Knopf threw up his hands in despair, lamenting that his efforts were fifty percent successful, he just wasn't sure which fifty percent.

RC