<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">

<channel>

<title>E-Intentionality</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/</link>
<description>Podcasts of the weekly E-Intentionality seminar series.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2011 22:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-uk</language>

<webMaster>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</webMaster>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/E-intentionality" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="e-intentionality" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><media:thumbnail url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/paics/pix/thinker.jpg" /><media:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</media:keywords><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">Science &amp; Medicine/Social Sciences</media:category><itunes:owner><itunes:email>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/paics/pix/thinker.jpg" /><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords><itunes:subtitle>Meetings of the weekly seminar series sponsored by the PAICS (Philosophy of AI and Cognitive Science) research group in the Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, UK.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Meetings of the weekly seminar series sponsored by the PAICS (Philosophy of AI and Cognitive Science) research group in the Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, UK.</itunes:summary><itunes:category text="Science &amp; Medicine"><itunes:category text="Social Sciences" /></itunes:category><item> 
<title>
Paul Loader:  Commodities and Cognition
</title>
<link>  
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-12-07.mp3
</link>
<guid> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-12-07.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2011 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Alfred Sohn-Rethel argues that the "enigmatic cognitive faculties of
civilived man" have their roots in the act of commodity exchange.  This is
put forward as a counter to a Kantian theory of cognition which locates the
conceptual prerequisites for sense-making in an a priori transcendental
subject....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=k1DNcbmeaMg:8XkJ7YTNvXA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Blay Whitby:  Better People - The Ethical Challenges of Transhumanism
</title>
<link>  
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-11-23.mp3
</link>
<guid> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-11-23.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The so-called "transhuman" technologies of human enhancement have serious
ethical implications. Technologies now under development, including
cognitive enhancement by pharmacological methods, direct brain implants,
advanced prosthetics, and genetic selection are seen by many writers as
moving us to a "posthuman future".&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=wO5ClxPzhrc:SKf_iJt0Lxg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Simon Bowes: A Discrete Cause Named Desire: Libet, Newcombe and Psychological Explanation
</title>
<link>  
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-11-16.mp3
</link>
<guid> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-111-16.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=mQ686R6Ba70:hVqHW3Bliiw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley: Interpretational Intentional Realism and Non-Transitivity
</title>
<link>  
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-11-09.mp3
</link>
<guid> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-11-09.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>In this preliminary report of research in progress, I present some possible
extensions to Dennett’s Intentional Systems Theory....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=G5JsH7HoayA:uzO0MDRYevA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Mike Beaton: Integrated Information and Externalism
</title>
<link>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-11-02.mp3
</link>
<guid>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-11-02.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Tononi’s Integrated Information Theory of consciousness comprises two major
claims. The first claim is that integrated information for the subject (in
some initial, pre-theoretic sense) is the right kind of thing to correspond
to consciousness. This, I will briefly suggest, is correct....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=LjRkkIUwxLs:Rm_WKe-BN10:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Steve Torrance: The More-Than-Human Mind - Diverging and Converging Visions 
</title>
<link>  
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-10-26.mp3
</link>
<guid> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-10-26.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I discuss the realizability and the ethical ramifications of machine ethics
(ME), from a number of different perspectives. I label these the
anthropocetnric, infocentric, biocentric, and ecocentric perspectives....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=CrTWmb4RYys:5KWjdZWAp0g:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item> 
<title>
Ricardo Sanz:  Intention and Control
</title>
<link>  
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-10-19.mp3
</link>
<guid> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-10-19.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>A flash view on intentionality from the perspective of a machine mind or, to
be more precise, from the perspective of a control engineer trying to build
a control system to improve the physical performance of a machine.
Controllers shall know and intend about the world out there. How do they do
that?&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=YIOWLgo-H4M:iOQglW6YaB0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title> 
Joel Parthemore:  Extending Conceptual Spaces
</title>
<link> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-06-24.mp3
</link>
<guid> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2010-06-24.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Peter Gärdenfors' conceptual spaces theory of concepts is an example of a
similarity space theory, which on the face of things puts it in company with
prototype and examplar theories of concepts, in the empirical tradition, and
in contrast with e.g. theory theory and informational atomism....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=naA_Xja2tf4:cFLYbJgvSwg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Joel Parthemore:  Putting Concepts Into a Context of Agents and Referents
</title>
<link>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-11-12.mp3
</link>
<guid>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-11-12.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I want to classify concepts according to categories of their referents as
well as categories of the agents who possess and employ them.  In the
process, the lines between concept and referent will become blurred....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=sMkqVWW4HZE:WiMVNgZiPew:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>


<item>
<title>
Blay Whitby, Anna Dumitriu:  Beliefs, Learning and Embodied Experience
</title>
<link>  
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-10-15.mp3
</link>
<guid> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-10-15.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>A belief can usually only be considered knowledge if it can be
scientifically justified and a false belief can never be considered
knowledge. The construction of a belief is a kind of learning process very
similar to that of knowledge acquisition...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=sQdxH5a7_wo:CrX8qkO2nRk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley:  All Done With Mirrors - Reflections on Denyer
</title>
<link>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-10-08.mp3
</link>
<guid>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-10-08.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The answer that (Denyer 1994) gives to the question "why do mirrors reverse
left/right and not up/down?" is criticized, and an alternative answer is
proposed....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=35B6nqMrhX0:6PCv1xbDhMs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Joel Parthemore:  Concepts - Introspection, Articulability, Publicity
</title>
<link>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-05-21.mp3
</link>
<guid>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-05-21.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 July 2010 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Concepts are often held to be necessarily introspectible, necessarily
articulable (e.g., by McDowell (1996)), and, consequently, necessarily
public (e.g., by Fodor (1998)).  I will present related arguments that all
three requirements should be relaxed....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=OK_yPP3fEBg:1j_5NEgruuk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>


<item>
<title>
Mike Beaton:  Qualia and Introspection
</title>
<link>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-02-19.mp3
</link>
<guid>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-02-19.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The claim that behaviourally undetectable inverted spectra are possible has
been endorsed by many physicalists. I explain why this starting point rules
out the standard form of scientific explanation for qualia....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=hqpto8KxT9U:mQ5tL_m3naA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Stan Rosenthal:  Art and Aging - The Work of John Piper
</title>
<link>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-02-12.mp3
</link>
<guid>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-02-12.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>This talk addresses some of the major issues being researched for a D. Phil,
the subject of which is art and ageing, with special regard to scaffolding,
the extended mind, and embodiment, as these apply to the visual artist. On
this occasion we concern ourselves with the life and work of John Piper....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=sCxC2q1BtHo:Z0GU5WggMxI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley: Knowledge and Physicalism
</title>
<link>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-02-05.mp3
</link>
<guid>
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-02-05.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>In "Epiphenomenal Qualia", Frank Jackson presents the Knowledge Argument
against physicalism, construed as the claim that all information is physical
information, that is "information [of the kind] that is provided by the
physical, chemical and biological sciences"....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=d7y6kze7xxQ:vi0KHtYGLsw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley:  Phenomenal Directness and the Extended Mind
</title>
<link>  
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-29.mp3
</link>
<guid> 
http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-29.mp3
</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Active Externalism, as put forward by Andy Clark and David Chalmers in their
1998 paper entitled "The Extended Mind", is the view that cognitive
processes at least sometimes extend beyond the biological body into the
non-biological environment....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=_IcR9eOUF5s:VVieZch_m1g:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<item>
<title>
Tom Froese:  Life and Mind ‘As-It-Could-Be’
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-22.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-22.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>In this seminar I want to reflect on the role of recent technological
developments, in particular the creation of artificial intelligence
and sensory augmentation interfaces, in relation to the goal of
gaining a better understanding of life and mind. I will argue that
both forms of technology are indispensable....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=DkrN17HH480:CAlP6mbhS7M:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-22.mp3" length="80151804" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-22.mp3" fileSize="80151804" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> In this seminar I want to reflect on the role of recent technological developments, in particular the creation of artificial intelligence and sensory augmentation interfaces, in relation to the goal of gaining a better understanding of life and mind. I w</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> In this seminar I want to reflect on the role of recent technological developments, in particular the creation of artificial intelligence and sensory augmentation interfaces, in relation to the goal of gaining a better understanding of life and mind. I will argue that both forms of technology are indispensable.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Joel Parthemore: Getting Clear on Our Terms - Symbols and
Representations as They Relate to Concepts
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-15.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-15.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>In writing a paper with Tony Morse at Skövde on a model for the mutual
scaffolding of concepts and experience, as a centrepiece for an
enactive theory of concepts, I found that I needed to devote
considerable space and thought early on in the paper to precisely what
I mean by "symbol" and "representation"....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=729BAf46"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-15.mp3" length="80537538" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2009-01-15.mp3" fileSize="80537538" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> In writing a paper with Tony Morse at Skövde on a model for the mutual scaffolding of concepts and experience, as a centrepiece for an enactive theory of concepts, I found that I needed to devote considerable space and thought early on in the paper to pr</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> In writing a paper with Tony Morse at Skövde on a model for the mutual scaffolding of concepts and experience, as a centrepiece for an enactive theory of concepts, I found that I needed to devote considerable space and thought early on in the paper to precisely what I mean by "symbol" and "representation".... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Joel Parthemore: The Inconsistent Foundations of Conceptual Mental Content
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-10-30.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-10-30.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Conceptual understandings, I want to argue, depend on certain
fundamental contradictions: what I would like to call necessary
fictions. These contradictions give rise to distinctions
e.g. self/other, agent/environment, individual/society,
internal/external...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?a=Lxk7pEs2TnY:lOAxFe7CQWg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/E-intentionality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-10-30.mp3" length="77062668" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-10-30.mp3" fileSize="77062668" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Conceptual understandings, I want to argue, depend on certain fundamental contradictions: what I would like to call necessary fictions. These contradictions give rise to distinctions e.g. self/other, agent/environment, individual/society, internal/extern</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Conceptual understandings, I want to argue, depend on certain fundamental contradictions: what I would like to call necessary fictions. These contradictions give rise to distinctions e.g. self/other, agent/environment, individual/society, internal/external... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Leslie Marsh:  Hayek's Philosophy of Mind
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-29-b.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-29-b.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Few know that social philosopher and economist Hayek had a central
interest in mind -- indeed, it underpins the work he is most famous
for. I want to outline his neglected contribution to cognitive science
and particularly make a case for his being taken as a grandee of
non-Cartesian cognitive science.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=O2sAZd4u"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-29-b.mp3" length="40623720" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-29-b.mp3" fileSize="40623720" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Few know that social philosopher and economist Hayek had a central interest in mind -- indeed, it underpins the work he is most famous for. I want to outline his neglected contribution to cognitive science and particularly make a case for his being taken</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Few know that social philosopher and economist Hayek had a central interest in mind -- indeed, it underpins the work he is most famous for. I want to outline his neglected contribution to cognitive science and particularly make a case for his being taken as a grandee of non-Cartesian cognitive science. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Simon Bowes:  Human Action in the Spaces of Reason
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-29-a.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-29-a.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Susan Hurley talks about animals acting in 'islands of practical
rationality rather than a continuous space of reasons' (Hurley, 2003,
p. 231). I will try to relate this to the analogous analogy I have
been using for our natural kind concepts....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=JrP9zN1z"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-29-a.mp3" length="38780077" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-29-a.mp3" fileSize="38780077" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Susan Hurley talks about animals acting in 'islands of practical rationality rather than a continuous space of reasons' (Hurley, 2003, p. 231). I will try to relate this to the analogous analogy I have been using for our natural kind concepts.... </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Susan Hurley talks about animals acting in 'islands of practical rationality rather than a continuous space of reasons' (Hurley, 2003, p. 231). I will try to relate this to the analogous analogy I have been using for our natural kind concepts.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Mike Beaton:  The Philosophy of the Real
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-22.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-22.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 11:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Perhaps that should be ‘Some Philosophy of the Real’. There’s a lot
more one could say. There’s even a lot more, I believe, which I could
say, these days. But this is enough for one E-I....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=ik3tKO1a"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-22.mp3" length="84796537" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-22.mp3" fileSize="84796537" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Perhaps that should be ‘Some Philosophy of the Real’. There’s a lot more one could say. There’s even a lot more, I believe, which I could say, these days. But this is enough for one E-I.... </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Perhaps that should be ‘Some Philosophy of the Real’. There’s a lot more one could say. There’s even a lot more, I believe, which I could say, these days. But this is enough for one E-I.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Blay Whitby:  What If There Were Nothing?  A Denial of Consciousness
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-15.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-15.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>For at least a hundred years there has been a serious and unresolved
philosophical problem in reconciling evidence-based accounts of human
behaviour with introspection-based accounts. For the first fifty years
this was usually called the mind-body problem....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=63rhQb4g"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-15.mp3" length="91780492" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-15.mp3" fileSize="91780492" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> For at least a hundred years there has been a serious and unresolved philosophical problem in reconciling evidence-based accounts of human behaviour with introspection-based accounts. For the first fifty years this was usually called the mind-body proble</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> For at least a hundred years there has been a serious and unresolved philosophical problem in reconciling evidence-based accounts of human behaviour with introspection-based accounts. For the first fifty years this was usually called the mind-body problem.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Paul Loader:  Why is a Watt Governor Less Alienated Than an Algorithm? 
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-08.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-08.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 08:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Cognitive Science is involved in a retreat from alienation. Descriptions of other processes at work in Cognitive Science, in terms of movements towards embeddedness, extendedness, enactivity, embodiment etc.., can all be subsumed under this broader description....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=vqcP2RZc"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-08.mp3" length="83351509" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-08.mp3" fileSize="83351509" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Cognitive Science is involved in a retreat from alienation. Descriptions of other processes at work in Cognitive Science, in terms of movements towards embeddedness, extendedness, enactivity, embodiment etc.., can all be subsumed under this broader descr</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Cognitive Science is involved in a retreat from alienation. Descriptions of other processes at work in Cognitive Science, in terms of movements towards embeddedness, extendedness, enactivity, embodiment etc.., can all be subsumed under this broader description.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Rob Clowes:  Artificial Consciousness and Structural Explanation
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-01.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-01.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Synthetic methods in science can aim at either instantiating a target
phenomenon or simulating key mechanisms underlying that phenonemon: 'strong'
and 'weak' approaches respectively. While the former assumes a mature
theory, the latter find its value in helping specify such theories....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=w02RuYXo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-01.mp3" length="84673514" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-05-01.mp3" fileSize="84673514" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Synthetic methods in science can aim at either instantiating a target phenomenon or simulating key mechanisms underlying that phenonemon: 'strong' and 'weak' approaches respectively. While the former assumes a mature theory, the latter find its value in </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Synthetic methods in science can aim at either instantiating a target phenomenon or simulating key mechanisms underlying that phenonemon: 'strong' and 'weak' approaches respectively. While the former assumes a mature theory, the latter find its value in helping specify such theories.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Alexandros Zographakis:  The Work of Art as a Cognitive Trail
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-04-24.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-04-24.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 10:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I offer a detailed suggestion which construes works of art as 'cognitive
trails'. My account recasts Adrian Cussins' 'theory of cognitive trails' and
argues for the deeper reasons which motivate us to see works of art as
'constructs' which, in turn, offer a powerful tool that gives an account of
how the distinction between mind and world emerges.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=YIPbUnMJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-04-24.mp3" length="82081331" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-04-24.mp3" fileSize="82081331" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> I offer a detailed suggestion which construes works of art as 'cognitive trails'. My account recasts Adrian Cussins' 'theory of cognitive trails' and argues for the deeper reasons which motivate us to see works of art as 'constructs' which, in turn, offe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> I offer a detailed suggestion which construes works of art as 'cognitive trails'. My account recasts Adrian Cussins' 'theory of cognitive trails' and argues for the deeper reasons which motivate us to see works of art as 'constructs' which, in turn, offer a powerful tool that gives an account of how the distinction between mind and world emerges. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Simon Bowes:  Philosophy and Landscape Gardening
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-03-13.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-03-13.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I will be looking at Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction, with a view to
offering a solution based on embodiment theory.  Firstly, I will present a
claim (of Rami Isreal) that most people have misunderstood the problem, and
then look at a proposed solution....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=jvfcugxD"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-03-13.mp3" length="86713154" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-03-13.mp3" fileSize="86713154" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> I will be looking at Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction, with a view to offering a solution based on embodiment theory. Firstly, I will present a claim (of Rami Isreal) that most people have misunderstood the problem, and then look at a proposed solution.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> I will be looking at Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction, with a view to offering a solution based on embodiment theory. Firstly, I will present a claim (of Rami Isreal) that most people have misunderstood the problem, and then look at a proposed solution.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Kyle Jennings:  Kinds of Novelty, and Their Place in the Creative Process
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-21.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-21.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Upon encountering something that we intuitively know is creative, we no
doubt also feel we've experienced something novel; for this reason, "novel"
and "creative" are closely aligned concepts.  However, directly translating
this into the act of creation neglects three important issues....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=MD46dafs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-21.mp3" length="84481252" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-21.mp3" fileSize="84481252" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Upon encountering something that we intuitively know is creative, we no doubt also feel we've experienced something novel; for this reason, "novel" and "creative" are closely aligned concepts. However, directly translating this into the act of creation n</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Upon encountering something that we intuitively know is creative, we no doubt also feel we've experienced something novel; for this reason, "novel" and "creative" are closely aligned concepts. However, directly translating this into the act of creation neglects three important issues.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Tom Beament:  No Way, Know How!
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-14.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-14.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>This presentation is a response to some recent papers on the distinction
between knowing how and knowing that. In particular, Stanley and
Williamson’s 2001 paper, “Knowing How” (S and W) and Snowdon’s 2004 paper,
“Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered” (Sn)....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=ZWKgeEm0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-14.mp3" length="79202010" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-14.mp3" fileSize="79202010" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> This presentation is a response to some recent papers on the distinction between knowing how and knowing that. In particular, Stanley and Williamson’s 2001 paper, “Knowing How” (S and W) and Snowdon’s 2004 paper, “Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinct</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> This presentation is a response to some recent papers on the distinction between knowing how and knowing that. In particular, Stanley and Williamson’s 2001 paper, “Knowing How” (S and W) and Snowdon’s 2004 paper, “Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered” (Sn).... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Joel Parthemore:  Concepts, Consciousness and Self-Reference
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-07-a.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-07-a.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>In 1995 Dave Chalmers introduced us to the phrase, "the hard problem of
consciousness." Dan Dennett has famously argued that the hard problem of
consciousness is an illusion. This paper will argue that the best candidate
for the "hard problem" is one that seems often curiously overlooked....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=RfDn6i8G"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-07-a.mp3" length="39854914" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-02-07-a.mp3" fileSize="39854914" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> In 1995 Dave Chalmers introduced us to the phrase, "the hard problem of consciousness." Dan Dennett has famously argued that the hard problem of consciousness is an illusion. This paper will argue that the best candidate for the "hard problem" is one tha</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> In 1995 Dave Chalmers introduced us to the phrase, "the hard problem of consciousness." Dan Dennett has famously argued that the hard problem of consciousness is an illusion. This paper will argue that the best candidate for the "hard problem" is one that seems often curiously overlooked.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Blay Whitby:  Sometimes It's Hard to Be a Robot
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-31.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-31.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>This is a call for informed debate on the ethical issues raised by the
forthcoming widespread use of robots, particularly in domestic settings.
Research shows that humans can sometimes become very abusive towards
computers and robots particularly when they are seen as humanlike....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=bxQOaDil"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-31.mp3" length="83842193" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-31.mp3" fileSize="83842193" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> This is a call for informed debate on the ethical issues raised by the forthcoming widespread use of robots, particularly in domestic settings. Research shows that humans can sometimes become very abusive towards computers and robots particularly when th</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> This is a call for informed debate on the ethical issues raised by the forthcoming widespread use of robots, particularly in domestic settings. Research shows that humans can sometimes become very abusive towards computers and robots particularly when they are seen as humanlike.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley:  Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-24.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-24.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I am in the final stages of preparing a draft entry (3,000 words) with the
above title for the Oxford Companion to Consciousness. I'd like to run my
draft past the group for comments and suggestions. Note that my topic is
*not* "machine consciousness"....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=zNfdHg51"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-24.mp3" length="77716165" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-24.mp3" fileSize="77716165" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> I am in the final stages of preparing a draft entry (3,000 words) with the above title for the Oxford Companion to Consciousness. I'd like to run my draft past the group for comments and suggestions. Note that my topic is *not* "machine consciousness"...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> I am in the final stages of preparing a draft entry (3,000 words) with the above title for the Oxford Companion to Consciousness. I'd like to run my draft past the group for comments and suggestions. Note that my topic is *not* "machine consciousness".... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Mike Beaton:  Qualia and Our Access to Them
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-17.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-17.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I will briefly recap the notion of pain in David Lewis's famous (but
controversial) Mad Pain and Martian Pain. I will point out that it is
basically the same notion as in the Churchland's Functionalism, Qualia and
Intentionality....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=HyJIWCtn"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-17.mp3" length="85395329" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-17.mp3" fileSize="85395329" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> I will briefly recap the notion of pain in David Lewis's famous (but controversial) Mad Pain and Martian Pain. I will point out that it is basically the same notion as in the Churchland's Functionalism, Qualia and Intentionality.... </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> I will briefly recap the notion of pain in David Lewis's famous (but controversial) Mad Pain and Martian Pain. I will point out that it is basically the same notion as in the Churchland's Functionalism, Qualia and Intentionality.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Joel Parthemore:  What Is a Concept? - Reframing the Question
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-10.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-10.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Our interaction with the world is largely driven, it might appear, by our
conceptual experience of it: I look in front of me and I cannot see the
individual pixels that, in some sense, make up the content of my retinal
array; once I have learned what such things are, I cannot help but see....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=DVwcZi1C"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-10.mp3" length="86884936" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2008-01-10.mp3" fileSize="86884936" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Our interaction with the world is largely driven, it might appear, by our conceptual experience of it: I look in front of me and I cannot see the individual pixels that, in some sense, make up the content of my retinal array; once I have learned what suc</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Our interaction with the world is largely driven, it might appear, by our conceptual experience of it: I look in front of me and I cannot see the individual pixels that, in some sense, make up the content of my retinal array; once I have learned what such things are, I cannot help but see.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Alexandros Zographakis:  Towards a Phenomenological Account of
Intelligibility
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-29.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-29.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>After giving a short exposition of Kathleen Stock's key points in "Fiction
and Psychological Insight" (M. Kieran and D. McIver Lopes eds., Knowing Art:
Essays in Aesthetics and Epistemology, pp. 51-66, 2006), I will examine in
detail the notion of "intelligibility" in fiction....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=ktKwO0wf"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-29.mp3" length="85450082" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-29.mp3" fileSize="85450082" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> After giving a short exposition of Kathleen Stock's key points in "Fiction and Psychological Insight" (M. Kieran and D. McIver Lopes eds., Knowing Art: Essays in Aesthetics and Epistemology, pp. 51-66, 2006), I will examine in detail the notion of "intel</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> After giving a short exposition of Kathleen Stock's key points in "Fiction and Psychological Insight" (M. Kieran and D. McIver Lopes eds., Knowing Art: Essays in Aesthetics and Epistemology, pp. 51-66, 2006), I will examine in detail the notion of "intelligibility" in fiction.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Leslie Marsh:  Stigmergic Cognition
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-22.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-22.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>A stigmergic conceptualization of social theory offers a theoretical
unification of the cognitive and the epistemological in matters of
sociality....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=zMpkmSYS"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-22.mp3" length="81840168" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-22.mp3" fileSize="81840168" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> A stigmergic conceptualization of social theory offers a theoretical unification of the cognitive and the epistemological in matters of sociality.... </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> A stigmergic conceptualization of social theory offers a theoretical unification of the cognitive and the epistemological in matters of sociality.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Tom Froese:  Hume and the Enactive Approach to Life and Mind
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-15.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-15.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>In a previous E-Int talk I related Hume's writings on life and mind to some
key elements of enactive cognitive science.  Drawing on this work, I will
attempt to illuminate both Hume's account of personal identity and the
enactive approach to organismic identity....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=Racf9XZQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-15.mp3" length="84552723" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-15.mp3" fileSize="84552723" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> In a previous E-Int talk I related Hume's writings on life and mind to some key elements of enactive cognitive science. Drawing on this work, I will attempt to illuminate both Hume's account of personal identity and the enactive approach to organismic id</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> In a previous E-Int talk I related Hume's writings on life and mind to some key elements of enactive cognitive science. Drawing on this work, I will attempt to illuminate both Hume's account of personal identity and the enactive approach to organismic identity.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Simon Bowes:  Bodily Functions - Embodied Mental States and Their Subservience Bases
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-08.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-08.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The debate about reduction of 'special scientific' kinds to physical
scientific kinds between Fodor and Kim is couched in terms of natural kinds,
supervenience and multiple realization....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=VGAIZ9Ee"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-08.mp3" length="79803453" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-11-08.mp3" fileSize="79803453" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> The debate about reduction of 'special scientific' kinds to physical scientific kinds between Fodor and Kim is couched in terms of natural kinds, supervenience and multiple realization.... </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> The debate about reduction of 'special scientific' kinds to physical scientific kinds between Fodor and Kim is couched in terms of natural kinds, supervenience and multiple realization.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley:  Best Intensions
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-10-11.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-10-11.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>There is an attractive way to explain representation in terms
of adaptivity: roughly, an item R represents a state of affairs S if it
has the proper function of co-occurring with S (that is, if the
ancestors of R co-occurred with S and this co-occurrence explains why R
was selected for, and thus why R exists now (cf Millikan).  Although
this may be an adequate account of the extension or reference of R, what
such explanations often neglect is an account of the intension or sense of
R....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=i47UK9iZ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-10-11.mp3" length="79209952" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-10-11.mp3" fileSize="79209952" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> There is an attractive way to explain representation in terms of adaptivity: roughly, an item R represents a state of affairs S if it has the proper function of co-occurring with S (that is, if the ancestors of R co-occurred with S and this co-occurrence</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> There is an attractive way to explain representation in terms of adaptivity: roughly, an item R represents a state of affairs S if it has the proper function of co-occurring with S (that is, if the ancestors of R co-occurred with S and this co-occurrence explains why R was selected for, and thus why R exists now (cf Millikan). Although this may be an adequate account of the extension or reference of R, what such explanations often neglect is an account of the intension or sense of R.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Alexandros Zographakis:  The Work of Art as a Cognitive Trail
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-06-14.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-06-14.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Have you ever felt puzzled because the person looking at you had a 'Mona
Lisa smile' on his/her face?  Did you ever catch yourself staring at a woman
with a 'Rubenesque figure'?  Are things very rough lately and maybe you
think you're living a 'Kafkaesque nightmare'?...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=RrzeLUvv"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-06-14.mp3" length="78366510" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-06-14.mp3" fileSize="78366510" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Have you ever felt puzzled because the person looking at you had a 'Mona Lisa smile' on his/her face? Did you ever catch yourself staring at a woman with a 'Rubenesque figure'? Are things very rough lately and maybe you think you're living a 'Kafkaesque </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Have you ever felt puzzled because the person looking at you had a 'Mona Lisa smile' on his/her face? Did you ever catch yourself staring at a woman with a 'Rubenesque figure'? Are things very rough lately and maybe you think you're living a 'Kafkaesque nightmare'?... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Tom Beament:  Two Conceptions of Consciousness
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-31.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-31.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Approaches to understanding the nature of conscious experience can be
grouped into two broad categories. Following John Campbell (Reference and
Consciousness, 2002) I will refer to these approaches as "The Relational
View" and "The Representational View." The Relational View conceives of
consciousness as fundamentally a matter of a relation to the world...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=fxm6VIS0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-31.mp3" length="80714604" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-31.mp3" fileSize="80714604" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Approaches to understanding the nature of conscious experience can be grouped into two broad categories. Following John Campbell (Reference and Consciousness, 2002) I will refer to these approaches as "The Relational View" and "The Representational View.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Approaches to understanding the nature of conscious experience can be grouped into two broad categories. Following John Campbell (Reference and Consciousness, 2002) I will refer to these approaches as "The Relational View" and "The Representational View." The Relational View conceives of consciousness as fundamentally a matter of a relation to the world... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Joel Parthemore:  In Search of the Concept of Concept
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-17.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-17.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I attended a workshop this past weekend in Copenhagen, titled CONCEPTS:
Content and Constitution. Peter Gardenfors, Jose Luiz Bermudez, Greg Ashby,
Ruth Millikan, Jesse Prinz, and Daniel Dennett all presented their
overlapping ideas about just what a concept is. I will present all their
different concepts of concept within the context of my own exploration of
concept content....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=O6eceN53"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-17.mp3" length="73949517" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-17.mp3" fileSize="73949517" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> I attended a workshop this past weekend in Copenhagen, titled CONCEPTS: Content and Constitution. Peter Gardenfors, Jose Luiz Bermudez, Greg Ashby, Ruth Millikan, Jesse Prinz, and Daniel Dennett all presented their overlapping ideas about just what a con</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> I attended a workshop this past weekend in Copenhagen, titled CONCEPTS: Content and Constitution. Peter Gardenfors, Jose Luiz Bermudez, Greg Ashby, Ruth Millikan, Jesse Prinz, and Daniel Dennett all presented their overlapping ideas about just what a concept is. I will present all their different concepts of concept within the context of my own exploration of concept content.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Mike Beaton:  Who's Representing What to Whom? (aka Inman Was Right)
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-10.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-10.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>When I first came here, Inman Harvey spent a long time trying to explain to
me that the notion of representation was intrinsically homuncular, and that
the notion of inner representation was conceptually flawed. This is my
'Inman was right' talk. (Though I don't yet know whether Inman will agree
with anything I say.)....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=uYMpnmQk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-10.mp3" length="83860583" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-05-10.mp3" fileSize="83860583" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> When I first came here, Inman Harvey spent a long time trying to explain to me that the notion of representation was intrinsically homuncular, and that the notion of inner representation was conceptually flawed. This is my 'Inman was right' talk. (Though</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> When I first came here, Inman Harvey spent a long time trying to explain to me that the notion of representation was intrinsically homuncular, and that the notion of inner representation was conceptually flawed. This is my 'Inman was right' talk. (Though I don't yet know whether Inman will agree with anything I say.).... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley:  Varieties of Depiction for Synthetic Phenomenology
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-04-26.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-04-26.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 14:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Not all research in machine consciousness aims to instantiate phenomenal
states in artifacts. For example, there is work that uses artifacts that do
not themselves have phenomenal states, merely to simulate or model organisms
that do....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=3BJAhdBp"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-04-26.mp3" length="78796590" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-04-26.mp3" fileSize="78796590" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Not all research in machine consciousness aims to instantiate phenomenal states in artifacts. For example, there is work that uses artifacts that do not themselves have phenomenal states, merely to simulate or model organisms that do.... </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Not all research in machine consciousness aims to instantiate phenomenal states in artifacts. For example, there is work that uses artifacts that do not themselves have phenomenal states, merely to simulate or model organisms that do.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Rob Clowes:  Transparency and Agency in Inner Speech
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-04-19.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-04-19.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 18:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>What is inner speech? How does its phenomenological aspect relate to its
functional and representational aspects? Does inner speech play a special
role in our inner-lives, and if so, how can we characterise it?...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=A3N9tbMV"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-04-19.mp3" length="79048619" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-04-19.mp3" fileSize="79048619" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> What is inner speech? How does its phenomenological aspect relate to its functional and representational aspects? Does inner speech play a special role in our inner-lives, and if so, how can we characterise it?... </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> What is inner speech? How does its phenomenological aspect relate to its functional and representational aspects? Does inner speech play a special role in our inner-lives, and if so, how can we characterise it?... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>


<item>
<title>
Steve Torrance:  Body-Mind/Fact-Value - How Do the Two Problems Interrelate?
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-15.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-15.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I examine the relationship between controversies over the nature of
conscious experience and controversies over the foundation for ethics. I
explore parallels between the two areas and some ways in which the two
fields are entangled....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=VIMAbEco"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-15.mp3" length="78333909" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-15.mp3" fileSize="78333909" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> I examine the relationship between controversies over the nature of conscious experience and controversies over the foundation for ethics. I explore parallels between the two areas and some ways in which the two fields are entangled.... </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> I examine the relationship between controversies over the nature of conscious experience and controversies over the foundation for ethics. I explore parallels between the two areas and some ways in which the two fields are entangled.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>Alexandros Zographakis:  Art, Perception, and the Possibilities of Body</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-08.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-08.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Margaret Boden in "Crafts, Perception, and the Possibilities of the Body
(British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 40, 3, July 2000) contrasts "art" and
"craft" through specific psychological theories of perception, namely
"indicative" and "enactive" ones.  The former put an emphasis on thought,
memory, and emotion whereas the latter on "fundamental" and "primitive"
bodily movements and "affordances"....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=s6m2rvJp"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-08.mp3" length="83170532" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-08.mp3" fileSize="83170532" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Margaret Boden in "Crafts, Perception, and the Possibilities of the Body (British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 40, 3, July 2000) contrasts "art" and "craft" through specific psychological theories of perception, namely "indicative" and "enactive" ones. Th</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Margaret Boden in "Crafts, Perception, and the Possibilities of the Body (British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 40, 3, July 2000) contrasts "art" and "craft" through specific psychological theories of perception, namely "indicative" and "enactive" ones. The former put an emphasis on thought, memory, and emotion whereas the latter on "fundamental" and "primitive" bodily movements and "affordances".... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>Duncan Kuhns: Edward's Dictum and the Supervenience Argument</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-01.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-01.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>...Or:  Problems with the metaphysical approach to causality.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=YegWFQca"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-01.mp3" length="69962604" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-03-01.mp3" fileSize="69962604" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> ...Or: Problems with the metaphysical approach to causality. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> ...Or: Problems with the metaphysical approach to causality. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title> Blay Whitby:  Transhumanism - Do We Want to Go All the Way to Ongar?</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-22.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-22.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Contemporary transhumansim encompasses a wide and growing set of both moral
and technological claims. In this talk I will provide some vectors along
which we might meaningfully describe some of those claims as 'extreme' ;
rather than merely strange or unusual. I will also attempt to identify some
claims as the core claims of transhumanism.... (Note that the first two
minutes of this podcast are missing due to recording problems.)&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=WhzPre4q"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-22.mp3" length="74174379" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-22.mp3" fileSize="74174379" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Contemporary transhumansim encompasses a wide and growing set of both moral and technological claims. In this talk I will provide some vectors along which we might meaningfully describe some of those claims as 'extreme' ; rather than merely strange or un</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Contemporary transhumansim encompasses a wide and growing set of both moral and technological claims. In this talk I will provide some vectors along which we might meaningfully describe some of those claims as 'extreme' ; rather than merely strange or unusual. I will also attempt to identify some claims as the core claims of transhumanism.... (Note that the first two minutes of this podcast are missing due to recording problems.) </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>Simon Bowes:  On Planet Pluto - How Scientists Decide the Extension of Natural Kind Terms</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-15.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-15.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Last year something fascinating happened in the world of science
(fascinating at least to those interested in natural kind terms). A bunch of
experts got together to decide whether Pluto was a planet or not, and
therefore to determine the demarcation criteria for the natural kind term
'planet'....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=Map81tPQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-15.mp3" length="74415123" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-15.mp3" fileSize="74415123" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Last year something fascinating happened in the world of science (fascinating at least to those interested in natural kind terms). A bunch of experts got together to decide whether Pluto was a planet or not, and therefore to determine the demarcation cri</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Last year something fascinating happened in the world of science (fascinating at least to those interested in natural kind terms). A bunch of experts got together to decide whether Pluto was a planet or not, and therefore to determine the demarcation criteria for the natural kind term 'planet'.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>Rob Clowes: The Complex Vehicles of Human Thought</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-08.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-08.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>It is often now held as obvious that what we need in the cognitive sciences
is an evolutionary account of the human mind. It is also sometimes claimed
that mind, consciousness and even language are biological phenomena. I think
such claims are based on misunderstandings about the limits of current and
probably future biological sciences. I will further argue it is possible and
indeed fruitful to hold such a position while cleaving to naturalism....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=XGnFhLXS"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-08.mp3" length="80307512" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-02-08.mp3" fileSize="80307512" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> It is often now held as obvious that what we need in the cognitive sciences is an evolutionary account of the human mind. It is also sometimes claimed that mind, consciousness and even language are biological phenomena. I think such claims are based on m</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> It is often now held as obvious that what we need in the cognitive sciences is an evolutionary account of the human mind. It is also sometimes claimed that mind, consciousness and even language are biological phenomena. I think such claims are based on misunderstandings about the limits of current and probably future biological sciences. I will further argue it is possible and indeed fruitful to hold such a position while cleaving to naturalism.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Marek McGann: Is There a Social Modality of Perception?
</title> 
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-30.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-30.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Our intuitive understandings of sensation and perception are dramatically
challenged by the group of related approaches to cognitive science that are
sometimes collected under the term "enactive". One issue that has arisen in
that literature, but which has thus far been given little attention, is the
fact that such enactive approaches to perception offer a new conception of
sensory and perceptual modalities....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=MQMvAeQG"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-30.mp3" length="77672697" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-30.mp3" fileSize="77672697" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Our intuitive understandings of sensation and perception are dramatically challenged by the group of related approaches to cognitive science that are sometimes collected under the term "enactive". One issue that has arisen in that literature, but which h</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Our intuitive understandings of sensation and perception are dramatically challenged by the group of related approaches to cognitive science that are sometimes collected under the term "enactive". One issue that has arisen in that literature, but which has thus far been given little attention, is the fact that such enactive approaches to perception offer a new conception of sensory and perceptual modalities.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>Tony Morse: On the Role(s) of Synthetic Modelling in Cognitive Science</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-25.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-25.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Synthetic modelling is just one method of empirical hypothesis testing
available to today's cognitive scientists. Just as physicists may construct a particle
accelerator in order to investigate the properties of sub-atomic particles,
researchers in the cognitive sciences are increasingly turning to computer
simulations and robotics to aid them in their quest for understanding
cognition and its underlying mechanisms.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=k0rcpk3G"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-25.mp3" length="80680974" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-25.mp3" fileSize="80680974" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Synthetic modelling is just one method of empirical hypothesis testing available to today's cognitive scientists. Just as physicists may construct a particle accelerator in order to investigate the properties of sub-atomic particles, researchers in the c</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Synthetic modelling is just one method of empirical hypothesis testing available to today's cognitive scientists. Just as physicists may construct a particle accelerator in order to investigate the properties of sub-atomic particles, researchers in the cognitive sciences are increasingly turning to computer simulations and robotics to aid them in their quest for understanding cognition and its underlying mechanisms. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley:  Epistemic Consistency and Knowledge-Based Systems
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-18.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-18.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>One traditional methodology within AI has been the construction of
knowledge-based systems (KBSs). At the heart of a KBS is a database of
sentences in a formal language, with a formal semantics. The idea is that
the existence in the database of a sentence S that means P is meant to model
believing P....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=CZQtsiFp"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-18.mp3" length="66442970" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-18.mp3" fileSize="66442970" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> One traditional methodology within AI has been the construction of knowledge-based systems (KBSs). At the heart of a KBS is a database of sentences in a formal language, with a formal semantics. The idea is that the existence in the database of a sentenc</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> One traditional methodology within AI has been the construction of knowledge-based systems (KBSs). At the heart of a KBS is a database of sentences in a formal language, with a formal semantics. The idea is that the existence in the database of a sentence S that means P is meant to model believing P.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Simon McGregor:  Are Our Everyday Mentalistic Concepts Too Coarse-Grained for AI?
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-11.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-11.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>This talk explores the idea of a 'domain of coherence' for concepts,
outside of which the concept is no longer safely applicable and
finer-grained distinctions are needed. I will suggest that notions like
life, agency, cognition, beliefs and so on have an everyday domain of
coherence, and that AI may operate outside that domain.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=NZJo0v4y"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-11.mp3" length="53841318" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2007-01-11.mp3" fileSize="53841318" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> This talk explores the idea of a 'domain of coherence' for concepts, outside of which the concept is no longer safely applicable and finer-grained distinctions are needed. I will suggest that notions like life, agency, cognition, beliefs and so on have a</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> This talk explores the idea of a 'domain of coherence' for concepts, outside of which the concept is no longer safely applicable and finer-grained distinctions are needed. I will suggest that notions like life, agency, cognition, beliefs and so on have an everyday domain of coherence, and that AI may operate outside that domain. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Alexandros Zographakis:  An Ecological Approach to Aesthetics
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-12-07.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-12-07.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Can the enactive theory put forth by Alva Noe and Kevin O'Regan provide us
with a radical framework for the understanding of the notion of aesthetic
experience? Can the study of aesthetic experience, in turn, provide us with
insights for perceptual experience in general? My aim will be to provide a
non-conceptual, sensorimotor unpacking of the notion of aesthetic
experience....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=Stkg0nRK"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-12-07.mp3" length="55279916" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-12-07.mp3" fileSize="55279916" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Can the enactive theory put forth by Alva Noe and Kevin O'Regan provide us with a radical framework for the understanding of the notion of aesthetic experience? Can the study of aesthetic experience, in turn, provide us with insights for perceptual exper</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Can the enactive theory put forth by Alva Noe and Kevin O'Regan provide us with a radical framework for the understanding of the notion of aesthetic experience? Can the study of aesthetic experience, in turn, provide us with insights for perceptual experience in general? My aim will be to provide a non-conceptual, sensorimotor unpacking of the notion of aesthetic experience.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Dustin Stokes and Jon Bird:  Evolving Fractal Drawings
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-30.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-30.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>We are using an evolutionary robotics approach to generate minimal models of
creativity. Our preliminary simulation results demonstrate that this
methodology can produce robots that mark their environments and interact
with the lines that they have made. These simulated robots possess a "no
strings attached" form of agency....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=zSk3y7q2"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-30.mp3" length="79413290" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-30.mp3" fileSize="79413290" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> We are using an evolutionary robotics approach to generate minimal models of creativity. Our preliminary simulation results demonstrate that this methodology can produce robots that mark their environments and interact with the lines that they have made.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> We are using an evolutionary robotics approach to generate minimal models of creativity. Our preliminary simulation results demonstrate that this methodology can produce robots that mark their environments and interact with the lines that they have made. These simulated robots possess a "no strings attached" form of agency.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Joel Parthemore:  Conceptual Building Blocks
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-23.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-23.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The limitations in the Cyc approach to knowledge representation are well
known and much commented upon -- even though Cycorp's stated goal remains to
"create the world's first true artificial intelligence, having both common
sense and the ability to reason with it." What exactly though are the
problems, if any, with Cyc and its approach to knowledge representation?...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=qIvqhBX7"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-23.mp3" length="78828974" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-23.mp3" fileSize="78828974" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> The limitations in the Cyc approach to knowledge representation are well known and much commented upon -- even though Cycorp's stated goal remains to "create the world's first true artificial intelligence, having both common sense and the ability to reas</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> The limitations in the Cyc approach to knowledge representation are well known and much commented upon -- even though Cycorp's stated goal remains to "create the world's first true artificial intelligence, having both common sense and the ability to reason with it." What exactly though are the problems, if any, with Cyc and its approach to knowledge representation?... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Steve Torrance:  The Ethical Status of Artificial Agents
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-09.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-09.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Artificial (or Machine) Ethics and Artificial (or Machine) Consciousness are
both relatively new fields allied to AI. What is 'Artificial Ethics' (AE)?
One should we distinguish between AE and what is sometimes called
'Techno-ethics'....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=kMuqGn0A"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-09.mp3" length="72157519" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-09.mp3" fileSize="72157519" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Artificial (or Machine) Ethics and Artificial (or Machine) Consciousness are both relatively new fields allied to AI. What is 'Artificial Ethics' (AE)? One should we distinguish between AE and what is sometimes called 'Techno-ethics'.... </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Artificial (or Machine) Ethics and Artificial (or Machine) Consciousness are both relatively new fields allied to AI. What is 'Artificial Ethics' (AE)? One should we distinguish between AE and what is sometimes called 'Techno-ethics'.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Blay Whitby:  Ethical Issues in Human-Robot Interaction
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-02.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-02.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>It not a conclusion of this paper that work in improving human-robot
interaction should be prevented or delayed. It is an area that has great
potential social benefits. However, despite the tremendous usefulness of
this sort of technology, the current failure to address ethical issues has
potentially serious consequences. These include the unintentional limitation
of human freedom, the reinforcement of existing power structures, and the
forcing of designers' views as to what is appropriate on to especially
vulnerable humans.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=eABzfO75"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-02.mp3" length="81008217" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-11-02.mp3" fileSize="81008217" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> It not a conclusion of this paper that work in improving human-robot interaction should be prevented or delayed. It is an area that has great potential social benefits. However, despite the tremendous usefulness of this sort of technology, the current fa</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> It not a conclusion of this paper that work in improving human-robot interaction should be prevented or delayed. It is an area that has great potential social benefits. However, despite the tremendous usefulness of this sort of technology, the current failure to address ethical issues has potentially serious consequences. These include the unintentional limitation of human freedom, the reinforcement of existing power structures, and the forcing of designers' views as to what is appropriate on to especially vulnerable humans. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Simon Bowes:  Human Kinds
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-19.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-19.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>In the presentation I gave at the Symposium on Language, Communication and
Cognition in June I argued that kind terms in cognitive science were
distinct from those in other sciences because of the kinds of
self-referential feedback that occurs when minds try to understand
themselves.  Recently, I gave found that similar considerations are used by
Ian Hacking to argue that 'human kinds' are not natural kinds.  I will be
looking at Rachael Cooper's refutation of Hacking's argument.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=yCvqLpU4"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-19.mp3" length="53643997" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-19.mp3" fileSize="53643997" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> In the presentation I gave at the Symposium on Language, Communication and Cognition in June I argued that kind terms in cognitive science were distinct from those in other sciences because of the kinds of self-referential feedback that occurs when minds</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> In the presentation I gave at the Symposium on Language, Communication and Cognition in June I argued that kind terms in cognitive science were distinct from those in other sciences because of the kinds of self-referential feedback that occurs when minds try to understand themselves. Recently, I gave found that similar considerations are used by Ian Hacking to argue that 'human kinds' are not natural kinds. I will be looking at Rachael Cooper's refutation of Hacking's argument. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Mike Beaton:  The Boundaries of the Conceptual
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-12.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-12.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Non-conceptualists argue that, to make room for consciousness in animals and
pre-linguistic humans, and to do justice to our own introspected conscious
experience, it is necessary to admit the existence of contents of experience
(i.e., "ways things seem") which cannot be described solely in terms of the
concepts (if any) being employed by the animal or human having the
experience. I will argue for the alternate view: conceptualism.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=PtCVzCmR"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-12.mp3" length="81513951" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-12.mp3" fileSize="81513951" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Non-conceptualists argue that, to make room for consciousness in animals and pre-linguistic humans, and to do justice to our own introspected conscious experience, it is necessary to admit the existence of contents of experience (i.e., "ways things seem"</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Non-conceptualists argue that, to make room for consciousness in animals and pre-linguistic humans, and to do justice to our own introspected conscious experience, it is necessary to admit the existence of contents of experience (i.e., "ways things seem") which cannot be described solely in terms of the concepts (if any) being employed by the animal or human having the experience. I will argue for the alternate view: conceptualism. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley:  Synthetic Phenomenology
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-05.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-05.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>An important, but relatively neglected, aspect of machine models of
consciousness is the requirement for a scientific phenomenology, or
systematic means of characterizing the experiential states being modeled.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=tLxJTN6N"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-05.mp3" length="81327523" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-10-05.mp3" fileSize="81327523" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> An important, but relatively neglected, aspect of machine models of consciousness is the requirement for a scientific phenomenology, or systematic means of characterizing the experiential states being modeled. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> An important, but relatively neglected, aspect of machine models of consciousness is the requirement for a scientific phenomenology, or systematic means of characterizing the experiential states being modeled. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Blay Whitby:  Do Robots Need Emotions?
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-07-20.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-07-20.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>This talk challenges the necessity of cognition involving emotion. It is, in
principle at least, possible to construct intelligent machinery with no
emotional faculties at all.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=Y1pizTE0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-07-20.mp3" length="85842296" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-07-20.mp3" fileSize="85842296" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> This talk challenges the necessity of cognition involving emotion. It is, in principle at least, possible to construct intelligent machinery with no emotional faculties at all. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> This talk challenges the necessity of cognition involving emotion. It is, in principle at least, possible to construct intelligent machinery with no emotional faculties at all. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>


<item>
<title>
Joel Parthemore:  Resemblance Redux
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-07-06.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-07-06.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Ever since the E-Intentionality talk that I gave last November, I have been
struggling with the question of whether, as someone inclined toward concept
empiricism, the account of reference I want to give is resemblance-based.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=A2G9rE7I"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-07-06.mp3" length="71804758" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-07-06.mp3" fileSize="71804758" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Ever since the E-Intentionality talk that I gave last November, I have been struggling with the question of whether, as someone inclined toward concept empiricism, the account of reference I want to give is resemblance-based. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Ever since the E-Intentionality talk that I gave last November, I have been struggling with the question of whether, as someone inclined toward concept empiricism, the account of reference I want to give is resemblance-based. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Marzieh Asgari-Targhi:  Babies Do Not Play Dice, Either!
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-29.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-29.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Gopnik et al (2004) suggest that there is evidence that infants and children
have the prerequisites for making causal inferences consistent with a causal
Bayes net learning algorithm.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=WAKWpDhW"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-29.mp3" length="44221541" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-29.mp3" fileSize="44221541" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Gopnik et al (2004) suggest that there is evidence that infants and children have the prerequisites for making causal inferences consistent with a causal Bayes net learning algorithm. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Gopnik et al (2004) suggest that there is evidence that infants and children have the prerequisites for making causal inferences consistent with a causal Bayes net learning algorithm. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
MA Presentations
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Presentation of the MA students intended thesis topics.  Available as
individual podcasts as well.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=l4FVO64k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08.mp3" length="70268314" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08.mp3" fileSize="70268314" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Presentation of the MA students intended thesis topics. Available as individual podcasts as well. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Presentation of the MA students intended thesis topics. Available as individual podcasts as well. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Zena Andreou: The Unconscious Origins of Self - Responsibility and Personality
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-zena.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-zena.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Based on the idea that the self is the result of unconscious processes, I
would like to question whether or not we are responsible for who we are, our
personality. If the self is rooted on the unconscious mind then to what
extent can we be responsible for it? I will refer to special cases such as
multiple personality disorder and also on the unity of consciousness.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=WqYLbYVa"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-zena.mp3" length="10491429" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-zena.mp3" fileSize="10491429" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Based on the idea that the self is the result of unconscious processes, I would like to question whether or not we are responsible for who we are, our personality. If the self is rooted on the unconscious mind then to what extent can we be responsible fo</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Based on the idea that the self is the result of unconscious processes, I would like to question whether or not we are responsible for who we are, our personality. If the self is rooted on the unconscious mind then to what extent can we be responsible for it? I will refer to special cases such as multiple personality disorder and also on the unity of consciousness. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Espen Bjorkedal: Perspectival Content in Noë's Theory of Perception
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-espen.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-espen.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Alva Noë gives an account of perception that relies heavily on his notion of
perspectival content or appearances. Appearances are perceptually basic
(this is the truth in sense-datum theories). Full blown perceptual content,
what he calls factual content, is constituted by our mastery of the
object-specific rules that govern the changes in appearance of an object as
a result of movement in relation to it....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=fJW3VplT"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-espen.mp3" length="12570322" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-espen.mp3" fileSize="12570322" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> Alva Noë gives an account of perception that relies heavily on his notion of perspectival content or appearances. Appearances are perceptually basic (this is the truth in sense-datum theories). Full blown perceptual content, what he calls factual content</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> Alva Noë gives an account of perception that relies heavily on his notion of perspectival content or appearances. Appearances are perceptually basic (this is the truth in sense-datum theories). Full blown perceptual content, what he calls factual content, is constituted by our mastery of the object-specific rules that govern the changes in appearance of an object as a result of movement in relation to it.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Iain O'Neill: Making Moral Machines - A Sketch of Virtual Virtues
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-iain.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-iain.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>In Cognitive science there is an overarching project to model all aspects of
mind. Part of what it is to have a mind is to be sensitive to moral features
of the world and to develop moral judgments. The modelling of moral
faculties and the decision-making procedure involved in moral judgment is an
appropriate area of study for A.I. and cognitive science....&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=Cqjo4rRt"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-iain.mp3" length="7734952" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-iain.mp3" fileSize="7734952" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> In Cognitive science there is an overarching project to model all aspects of mind. Part of what it is to have a mind is to be sensitive to moral features of the world and to develop moral judgments. The modelling of moral faculties and the decision-makin</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> In Cognitive science there is an overarching project to model all aspects of mind. Part of what it is to have a mind is to be sensitive to moral features of the world and to develop moral judgments. The modelling of moral faculties and the decision-making procedure involved in moral judgment is an appropriate area of study for A.I. and cognitive science.... </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Christin Jager: The Phenomenon of Self-Awareness in Humans and Animals
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-christin.mp3</link> 
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-christin.mp3</guid> 
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The topic of my dissertation is going to be about the phenomenon of
self-awareness in humans and nonhuman animals. Thereby, the focus will be on
the mirror test or mark tests as firstly introduced by the comparative
psychologist, Gordon Gallup, in 1970.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=61khspXs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-christin.mp3" length="7840697" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-christin.mp3" fileSize="7840697" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> The topic of my dissertation is going to be about the phenomenon of self-awareness in humans and nonhuman animals. Thereby, the focus will be on the mirror test or mark tests as firstly introduced by the comparative psychologist, Gordon Gallup, in 1970. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> The topic of my dissertation is going to be about the phenomenon of self-awareness in humans and nonhuman animals. Thereby, the focus will be on the mirror test or mark tests as firstly introduced by the comparative psychologist, Gordon Gallup, in 1970. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Rebecca Rumens: Concepts in Action
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-rebecca.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-rebecca.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:15:00 GMT</pubDate>                             
<description>I analyse the content of activity guidance in terms of tactile- kinaesthetic
concepts: that is, concepts of ways of moving and responding to the felt
sensitivities or action-signals generated in skilled activity.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=OYWscj7v"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>                                                               
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>  

<item>
<title>
Alexandros Zographakis: The Enactive Constitution of Perception - A Critical
Discussion of Noë's Sensorimotor Approach to Vision and Visual Consciousness
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-alex.mp3</link> 
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-alex.mp3</guid> 
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>In my thesis I will present and discuss the enactive view, a theory of
perception put forth by Alva Noë which focuses on the claim that perception
is a thoughtful activity. I will provide a short overview of the enactive
view followed by a critical discussion of the empirical data which support
it.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=65DgT9Xp"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>                                                              
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-alex.mp3" length="14177376" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-08-alex.mp3" fileSize="14177376" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> In my thesis I will present and discuss the enactive view, a theory of perception put forth by Alva Noë which focuses on the claim that perception is a thoughtful activity. I will provide a short overview of the enactive view followed by a critical discu</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> In my thesis I will present and discuss the enactive view, a theory of perception put forth by Alva Noë which focuses on the claim that perception is a thoughtful activity. I will provide a short overview of the enactive view followed by a critical discussion of the empirical data which support it. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>   

<item>
<title>
Ron Chrisley on It's a Surprise!
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-01.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-01.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>"The subject of the talk is a surprise -- and you'll see why!"&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=fEvYIG5w"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-01.mp3" length="80672968" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-06-01.mp3" fileSize="80672968" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> "The subject of the talk is a surprise -- and you'll see why!" </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> "The subject of the talk is a surprise -- and you'll see why!" </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>

<item>
<title>
Duncan Kuhns on Biological Intentionality and Mental Causation
</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-05-18.mp3</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-05-18.mp3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 17:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I'll be outlining a physicalist approach to mental causation that is
non-reductive (in the sense that mental causes don't reduce ontologically to
physical causes), but which doesn't require downward causation. The idea is
to avoid the critique of downward causation that is given by Jaegwon Kim,
while preserving the causal efficacy of mental states.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=DSjlgzsd"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author><enclosure url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-05-18.mp3" length="73521681" type="audio/mpeg" /><media:content url="http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-05-18.mp3" fileSize="73521681" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle> I'll be outlining a physicalist approach to mental causation that is non-reductive (in the sense that mental causes don't reduce ontologically to physical causes), but which doesn't require downward causation. The idea is to avoid the critique of downwar</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</itunes:author><itunes:summary> I'll be outlining a physicalist approach to mental causation that is non-reductive (in the sense that mental causes don't reduce ontologically to physical causes), but which doesn't require downward causation. The idea is to avoid the critique of downward causation that is given by Jaegwon Kim, while preserving the causal efficacy of mental states. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>philosophy,cogsci,intentionality,embodiment,evolutionary</itunes:keywords></item>	

<item>
<title>Tom Froese on The role of Scientific Knowledge in Wheeler's RECONSTRUCTING THE COGNITIVE WORLD</title>
<link>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-05-11.mp4</link>
<guid>http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/research/groups/paics/e-int/podcasts/2006-05-11.mp4</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 02:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Wheeler (2005) begins his book with two explicit assumptions: 1) that
physicalism is true, and 2) that whenever there is an inconsistency between
philosophy and natural science, it is philosophy which has to give way.
The aim of this talk is to show that assumption 1) violates assumption 2)
when considered from a consistent Heideggerian framework.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?a=ODrgEdlO"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/E-intentionality?d=41" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<author>jep25@sussex.ac.uk (Joel Parthemore)</author></item>

<media:rating>nonadult</media:rating></channel>
</rss>

