Fast Company is a US magazine that emphasizes change in business, and focuses on leadership, technology and social dimensions of business.  Fast Company has a strong readership and is regarded as the voice of innovation in business in the US.

We are very proud of her listing. It will certainly help to to get more attention to OpenCourseWare, the Consortium and hopefully also TU Delft's OpenCourseWare website.

Interesting to see is that we get a lot more international attention for Anka as president of the consortium than in the Dutch media.
The last couple of months there are 2 articles in New York Times/International Herald Tribune (#1, #2), article in Times Higher Education, and an article in the Guardian.

Walter is nu ook gevraagd om een college te geven in de DWDD University-serie. Het is nog niet bekend wanneer dit gaat plaatsvinden.

Ik vind het prachtig om te zien hoe Walter de boel op stelten kan zetten. Hij heeft geen haast in tegenstelling tot DWDD, dus loopt het allemaal uit. Matthijs had er duidelijk moeite mee.

• Doug Holton - What’s the “problem” with MOOCs?
  This article is about improving MOOCs with problem based learning. MOOLE = Open Education + Problem-based learning.
  
  
• Steve Carson and Philipp Schmidt - The Massive Open Online Professor
  this article is about the role of the professor in a MOOC, especially the really large scale classes with more than a couple of thousand students.
  
  
• Bon Steward - the problem with EdX: a MOOC by any other name?
  this brand-new Mother of All MOOCs is, in the end, likely to do as much preserving of the traditional structures of education – especially in terms of learning – than it is to disrupt them.
  
  
• Ignatia - Selecting meaningful #socialmedia tools for a #MOOC or #PLN
  A big part of setting up an open, online course (e.g. MOOC) is the selection of meaning social media tools. This blog gives a nice overview.
  
  
• Jonathan Rees - What’s the difference between a MOOC and the University of Phoenix?
  Is it “branding” or “not much at all”?
  
  
• Fred Haas - Thoughts on the Curtis Bonk MOOC and Learning Management Systems
  Reflections on Curtis Bonk's MOOC.
  
  
• Sherman Dorn - HypeX: What edX can and can’t do
  Three cases in which the MOOC model will work according to Sherman

• What's New?
  They made it a big announcement, but if I look at it, the only difference is that they spend a lot of money on it. So what is the fuss about?
  
  
• Platform
  Why do all those Open Education initiative (Stanford, MIT) develop their own platform? Now we have Udacity, Coursera and EdX. The first two provide open education, but are not open-source platforms. EdX certainly is open-source. But there are already a couple of platforms that are used around campuses, which are suitable for Open Education. The Open University UK uses Moodle, Blackboard is doing a MOOC on their Coursesites platform (which is a standard Blackboard Learn with some additional building blocks) and there are more platforms.
  
  
• Sustainability
  MIT and Harvard are both investing $ 30 mln. That is enormous amount of money. It puts Harvard recent announcement about the costs of journals in other perspective. I personally think that with that amount of money you never can get it sustainable. Especially because it get financially self-supporting in a couple of years. It would be much more impressive if they could do this for less then $ 1 mln.
  
  
• Connect online and offline learning
  I'm really interested in the research they are going to do within the project: “research how students learn and how technologies can facilitate effective teaching both on-campus and online. The edX platform will enable the study of which teaching methods and tools are most successful. The findings of this research will be used to inform how faculty use technology in their teaching, which will enhance the experience for students on campus and for the millions expected to take advantage of these new online offerings.”
  
  
• Certification
  In the FAQ they write: "As determined by the edX board, MIT and Harvard, online learners who demonstrate mastery of subjects could earn a certificate of completion, but such certificates would not be issued under the name Harvard or MIT." What does this mean exactly? You will get a certificate, but it is not issued from MIT or Harvard? Is this worth anything?
  
  
• Connect the dots
  I like the concept they announced to connect residential education with OpenCourseWare and Open Education. This is something that is interesting for a lot of brick-and-mortar universities.
  
  
• What do their own students think about it?
  I would be interested to hear what the students of MIT and Harvard think about it. The big question is, what could they have done with 30 mln to improve residential education? In this regard it is interesting to read this weeks posts in The Chronicle.

So, I like the initiative and really appreciate the steps Harvard and MIT are making. But I'm not sure if this is as disruptive as we would like it to be.

Harvard University and MIT today announced edX, a transformational new partnership in online education. Through edX, the two institutions will collaborate to enhance campus-based teaching and learning and build a global community of online learners. 

EdX will build on both universities’ experience in offering online instructional content. The technological platform recently established by MITx, which will serve as the foundation for the new learning system, was designed to offer online versions of MIT courses featuring video lesson segments, embedded quizzes, immediate feedback, student-ranked questions and answers, online laboratories and student-paced learning. Certificates of mastery will be available for those who are motivated and able to demonstrate their knowledge of the course material. 

Below is the official press conference:

Video streaming by UstreamI agree with Susan Hockfield that Online Education is not an enemy of residential education. It offers new possibilities and make higher education better accesible for those who need it, but can't afford it.

I'm a bit jealous in the amount of money ($60mln) they put in this initiative. That certainly helps to get this started and make it into a big succes and maybe even be disruptive.

Last week I was in Cambridge (UK) for the 2012 OpenCourseWare Global Conference combined with the UK OER12 conference. Below is a list of online articles, blogs and others that have been published (if you miss an article, please leave a comment or tweet):

• Markus Deimann: Inspirations from Cambridge 2012 #cam12
• Gabi Witthaus: The OER university: from vision to reality
• Joe Wilson: #Cam12 Innovation and Impact Open Educational Resources
• David Kernohan: Bricking against the clicks?
• Laura Czerniewicz: Open Education: part of the broader open scholarship terrain
• Lorna Campbell: #cam12 Keynotes, backchannels and undercurrents
• New York Times (Don Guttenplan): Building Schools Out of Clicks, Not Bricks
• Robert Schuwer: Blog Cambridge 2012 congres over OER: dag 3, 18 april 2012 (in Dutch)
• Robert Schuwer: Blog Cambridge 2012 congres over OER: diner pensant, 16 april 2012 (in Dutch)
• Hester Jelgerhuis: Blog Cambridge 2012 congres over OER: dag 1, 16 april 2012 (in Dutch)
• Hester Jelgerhuis: Blog Cambridge 2012 congres over OER: dag 2, 17 april 2012 (in Dutch)
• Hester Jelgerhuis: Blog Cambridge 2012 congres over OER: pre-conference workshop, 15 april 2012 (in Dutch)
• Jos Rikers: UNESCO Chairs in OER at OCWC Cambridge 2012 16-18 April
• Ria Jacobi: Mobiliteit en OER (in Dutch)
• Vicki McGarvey: Cambridge 2012
• Laura Czerniewicz: Openness at the University of Cape Town
• Una Daly: A Day at Open University, UK
• Sailor.org: Innovation and Impact in Cambridge
• Guardian: Open for business? Why universities must collaborate on OpenCourseWare
• Jenny Gray: Thoughts after OpenCourseware Global 2012
• Yvette Adams: Cambridge 2012: Innovation and Impact - Report back
• Lorna Campbell: Open Education in Europe - SURF’s “diner pensant”
• Education Development Unit (FHS): Conference Pens, Gunslingers And Business Cards
• Emily Puckett Rodgers: Drop the ‘e’ get on with the learning

There is also an archive of all the tweets and the pictures I have taken. Other pictures are on flickr.

The wordcloud is CC-BY mhawksey.

<p >Please join us in CourseSites for a unique opportunity to learn with Dr. Bonk -- and from each other -- in our first open course focused on increasing student engagement and motivation online. We know your time is valuable and limited, so in this course you choose your level of participation. Whether you simply drop in or fully engage, we hope to see you online!

Course Title: Instructional Ideas and Technology Tools for Online Success

Description: Motivating students and creating community within blended and online learning environments are crucial to academic achievement and success. This open course will provide both theoretical concepts and practical tools for instructors to improve motivation, retention, and engagement within blended and online courses.

Course Objectives:

• Identify and apply relevant motivational strategies and instructional techniques
• Construct thinking skill options for different types of learners and subjects
• Design and share innovative thinking skill activities as well as unique cooperative learning
• Map and apply instructional models and ideas to online learning tools

Course Duration: April 30th- June 4th ( A total of 5 weeks)

Not only is it an interesting subject, but also good to see that Blackboard is taking the initiative to host an open course. I'm certainly participating in the course, not only to learn from Curtis, but also to see how the platform works for an open course.

The theme of the conference is Innovation and Impact - Openly Collaborating to Enhance Education. The conference starts on Sunday with pre-conferences and ends on Wednesday. For the die-hards (I'm one of them) there is another conference organised by the Open University of Thursday.

It will be a busy time for me. On Sunday I have a project meeting of my EU-project, on Tuesday we have the OCWC-boardmeeting and I'm asked to make photo's during the conference.

Interesting is that on Tuesday the regional forum of UNESCO is taking place at the conference. This is a preparation for the UNESCO world congress on OER in June.