<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss1full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">

<channel rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/">

<title>EconLog: Library of Economics and Liberty</title>

<link>http://econlog.econlib.org/</link>

<description />

<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>

<dc:creator />

<dc:date>2013-05-24T01:44:20</dc:date>

<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.21-en" />

<items>

<rdf:Seq>

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/coase_on_a_plan_1.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/consumer_surplu_4.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/coase_on_a_plan.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/the_flaw_in_hey.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/commuting_chron.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/tocquevilles_tw.html" />

</rdf:Seq>

</items>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rdf+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Econlog" /><feedburner:info uri="econlog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /></channel>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/coase_on_a_plan_1.html">

<title>Coase on a Plane: My Answer</title>

<description>(May 24, 2013 01:44 AM, by Art Carden) Thanks to everyone who offered excellent comments on my last post. Most people were thinking about it the way I do. To recap, here were the questions I someday want to ask on an exam or in a job interview:... (0 COMMENTS)&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=Ek4vQkG3ios:uSqGc-Vl0BQ:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=Ek4vQkG3ios:uSqGc-Vl0BQ:I9og5sOYxJI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=I9og5sOYxJI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=Ek4vQkG3ios:uSqGc-Vl0BQ:-BTjWOF_DHI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=Ek4vQkG3ios:uSqGc-Vl0BQ:-BTjWOF_DHI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=Ek4vQkG3ios:uSqGc-Vl0BQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=Ek4vQkG3ios:uSqGc-Vl0BQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=Ek4vQkG3ios:uSqGc-Vl0BQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/Ek4vQkG3ios/coase_on_a_plan_1.html</link>

<dc:subject>Cost-benefit Analysis</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Art Carden</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2013-05-24T01:44:20</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/coase_on_a_plan_1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/consumer_surplu_4.html">

<title>Consumer Surplus: An Application of the Concept</title>

<description>(May 23, 2013 12:50 PM, by David Henderson) I've written on consumer surplus a number of times on this blog. See here. David Boaz recently posted on a 1979 talk by Nathaniel Branden to which I was the introducer. In my intro to Nathan, I applied the concept... (2 COMMENTS)&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=3RhTxBgab_o:VKthuzrsHcQ:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=3RhTxBgab_o:VKthuzrsHcQ:I9og5sOYxJI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=I9og5sOYxJI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=3RhTxBgab_o:VKthuzrsHcQ:-BTjWOF_DHI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=3RhTxBgab_o:VKthuzrsHcQ:-BTjWOF_DHI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=3RhTxBgab_o:VKthuzrsHcQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=3RhTxBgab_o:VKthuzrsHcQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=3RhTxBgab_o:VKthuzrsHcQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/3RhTxBgab_o/consumer_surplu_4.html</link>

<dc:subject>Cost-benefit Analysis</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>David Henderson</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2013-05-23T12:50:12</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/consumer_surplu_4.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/coase_on_a_plan.html">

<title>Coase on a Plane, or, an Idea, Recycled</title>

<description>(May 23, 2013 11:40 AM, by Art Carden) I agree with co-blogger Bryan that most voters are rationally irrational. My sense is that there are also a lot of voters and people in positions of influence who know just enough economics to be dangerous. As Steve Horwitz and... (16 COMMENTS)&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=cT1htY7qX3I:GA2ix9fP_0k:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=cT1htY7qX3I:GA2ix9fP_0k:I9og5sOYxJI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=I9og5sOYxJI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=cT1htY7qX3I:GA2ix9fP_0k:-BTjWOF_DHI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=cT1htY7qX3I:GA2ix9fP_0k:-BTjWOF_DHI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=cT1htY7qX3I:GA2ix9fP_0k:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=cT1htY7qX3I:GA2ix9fP_0k:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=cT1htY7qX3I:GA2ix9fP_0k:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/cT1htY7qX3I/coase_on_a_plan.html</link>

<dc:subject>Microeconomics</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Art Carden</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2013-05-23T11:40:46</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/coase_on_a_plan.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/the_flaw_in_hey.html">

<title>The Flaw in Heyne, Boettke, and Prychitko</title>

<description>(May 23, 2013 03:27 AM, by David Henderson) In a post on Tuesday, "Find the Flaw," I asked readers to find and evaluate the implicit assumption in the following passage from an economics textbook: When physicians must be licensed and new drugs approved by the Food and Drug... (10 COMMENTS)&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=QsK5GXMvvnw:iQfSu9Glw34:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=QsK5GXMvvnw:iQfSu9Glw34:I9og5sOYxJI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=I9og5sOYxJI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=QsK5GXMvvnw:iQfSu9Glw34:-BTjWOF_DHI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=QsK5GXMvvnw:iQfSu9Glw34:-BTjWOF_DHI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=QsK5GXMvvnw:iQfSu9Glw34:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=QsK5GXMvvnw:iQfSu9Glw34:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=QsK5GXMvvnw:iQfSu9Glw34:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/QsK5GXMvvnw/the_flaw_in_hey.html</link>

<dc:subject>Economics of Health Care</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>David Henderson</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2013-05-23T03:27:04</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/the_flaw_in_hey.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/commuting_chron.html">

<title>Commuting, Chronic Stress, and Costs That Are Harder to See</title>

<description>(May 22, 2013 04:27 PM, by Art Carden) This morning, I tweeted the following: Spend extra $ to cut your commute. I read (in @rdobelli's book?) that we underestimate commuting costs.&amp;mdash; Art Carden (@artcarden) May 22, 2013 We've tried to model it. When we lived in Memphis, we... (12 COMMENTS)&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=XVebEjLhKP0:LNiXVMX0Xh8:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=XVebEjLhKP0:LNiXVMX0Xh8:I9og5sOYxJI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=I9og5sOYxJI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=XVebEjLhKP0:LNiXVMX0Xh8:-BTjWOF_DHI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=XVebEjLhKP0:LNiXVMX0Xh8:-BTjWOF_DHI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=XVebEjLhKP0:LNiXVMX0Xh8:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=XVebEjLhKP0:LNiXVMX0Xh8:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=XVebEjLhKP0:LNiXVMX0Xh8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/XVebEjLhKP0/commuting_chron.html</link>

<dc:subject>Behavioral Economics and Rationality</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Art Carden</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2013-05-22T16:27:06</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/commuting_chron.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/tocquevilles_tw.html">

<title>Tocqueville's Tweeters</title>

<description>(May 22, 2013 12:21 PM, by David Henderson) Private Sector, 1: FEMA, 0 Social media is [sic] often recognized narrowly as a way to connect with friends, or to share and read the news. Yesterday it was demonstrated that social media can serve as a medium of mobilization... (8 COMMENTS)&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=0SNH9N--qBg:3gk7WdgRulI:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=0SNH9N--qBg:3gk7WdgRulI:I9og5sOYxJI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=I9og5sOYxJI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=0SNH9N--qBg:3gk7WdgRulI:-BTjWOF_DHI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=0SNH9N--qBg:3gk7WdgRulI:-BTjWOF_DHI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=0SNH9N--qBg:3gk7WdgRulI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?i=0SNH9N--qBg:3gk7WdgRulI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?a=0SNH9N--qBg:3gk7WdgRulI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Econlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/0SNH9N--qBg/tocquevilles_tw.html</link>

<dc:subject>Central Planning vs. Local Knowledge</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>David Henderson</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2013-05-22T12:21:09</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/05/tocquevilles_tw.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



</rdf:RDF>
