<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss1full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">

<channel rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/">

<title>EconLog: Library of Economics and Liberty</title>

<link>http://econlog.econlib.org/</link>

<description />

<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>

<dc:creator />

<dc:date>2009-07-05T08:32:34</dc:date>

<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.21-en" />

<items>

<rdf:Seq>

<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/statistical_vs.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/personality_pro.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/idolatry_in_a_f.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/favorite_econom.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/social_science.html" />



<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/further_reply_t.html" />

</rdf:Seq>

</items>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Econlog" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /></channel>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/statistical_vs.html">

<title>Statistical vs. Material Significance</title>

<description>(July  5, 2009 08:32 AM, by Arnold Kling) I appreciate Bryan's pointer to an article by Alan Gerber and others on personality and ideology. However, the article illustrates what I consider to be a methodological error. That error is to use statistical significance as a metric. Statistical significance...</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/z_2-2ZJC8J8/statistical_vs.html</link>

<dc:subject>Economic Methods</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Arnold Kling</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2009-07-05T08:32:34</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/statistical_vs.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/personality_pro.html">

<title>Personality Profile of a Free-Marketeer: Extroverted, Disagreeable, Conscientious, Stable, and Closed</title>

<description>(July  4, 2009 10:30 PM, by Bryan Caplan) <![CDATA[Left-right ideology is the single most powerful determinant of party identification and issue positions, but ideology itself is almost impossible to predict.&nbsp; It does have a few mild correlates - for example, the well-educated are a little more liberal, the...]]></description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/wX9QKLk0X1M/personality_pro.html</link>

<dc:subject>Politics and Economics</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Bryan Caplan</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2009-07-04T22:30:00</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/personality_pro.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/idolatry_in_a_f.html">

<title>Idolatry in a Free Society</title>

<description>(July  3, 2009 05:39 PM, by Bryan Caplan) I've spent several days reflecting on my chairman's reaction to public grief over Michael Jackson's death:I, for one, am no more touched by Mr. Jackson's death than I am by the death of any of the thousands of other Americans...</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/2BjvyEkMS4I/idolatry_in_a_f.html</link>

<dc:subject>Economics and Culture</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Bryan Caplan</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2009-07-03T17:39:08</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/idolatry_in_a_f.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/favorite_econom.html">

<title>Favorite Economics Dialogues in Movies</title>

<description>(July  3, 2009 09:00 AM, by David Henderson) Here's one of mine, from Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window. It's about one of the most important things economics deals with--incentives. Lisa (played by Grace Kelly) and Jeff (played by Jimmy Stewart), are listening to a man in another apartment play...</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/N8yIB5_AZYs/favorite_econom.html</link>

<dc:subject>Economics and Culture</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>David Henderson</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2009-07-03T09:00:59</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/favorite_econom.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/social_science.html">

<title>Social Science and Public Policy</title>

<description>(July  3, 2009 08:44 AM, by Arnold Kling) How do economists and other social scientists influence public policy? Yesterday, I recommended Jeffrey Friedman's article on the financial crisis. Its theme is regulatory hubris, and Friedman disparages "economism," which might be described as a belief that wise economists can...</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/COVdiCqDS50/social_science.html</link>

<dc:subject>Political Economy</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Arnold Kling</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2009-07-03T08:44:38</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/social_science.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



<item rdf:about="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/further_reply_t.html">

<title>Further Reply to Matt: Who is "We"?</title>

<description>(July  2, 2009 06:45 PM, by David Henderson) Like some commenters, I found Bryan Caplan's post on health care today to be one of his best. And he's already set a high bar. But, believe it or not, given that Bryan is a more-radical libertarian than I am,...</description>

<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Econlog/~3/Z9APuTM05pU/further_reply_t.html</link>

<dc:subject />

<dc:creator>David Henderson</dc:creator>

<dc:date>2009-07-02T18:45:01</dc:date>

<feedburner:origLink>http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/07/further_reply_t.html</feedburner:origLink></item>



</rdf:RDF>
