<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Edward Rayne</title>
	
	<link>http://erayne.com</link>
	<description>Superior Website Development and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:11:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/EdwardRayne" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="edwardrayne" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">EdwardRayne</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Content Strategies</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/content-strategies</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/content-strategies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SummerLudwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Site Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that it will sound cliche but unique, quality content really is the best way to make your website a success. Even with all of the tweaks to algorithms on the various search engines, it&#8217;s obvious that content really is king when it comes to SEO. The good thing about that is that content [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that it will sound cliche but unique, quality content really is the best way to make your website a success. Even with all of the tweaks to algorithms on the various search engines, it&#8217;s obvious that content really is king when it comes to SEO. The good thing about that is that content is also important to your customers. It doesn&#8217;t matter how pretty and flashy your site is if the surfer can&#8217;t get the info they are looking for, or if they have to work to get it they will not return. </p>
<p>A lot of SEO companies will stress paid search engine placement for your keywords, while we don&#8217;t discount that as a part of some SEO campaigns, it won&#8217;t mean a lot if all of the traffic driven to your site doesn&#8217;t find the content they were looking for. That&#8217;s where knowing how to develop and implement your content comes in.</p>
<p>Of course, content strategies will vary based on the kind of site that you have. One thing that all content strategies should contain, however; is in depth search engine optimization research. Every piece of content on your site should be crafted with your key words, competition, and potential customers in mind. While it takes a lot of work up front, it pays off with big SEO returns after launch. </p>
<p>A big &#8220;no-no&#8221; is simply regurgitating what you have found elsewhere. Not only do search engines frown upon this, but if your &#8220;borrowing&#8221; isn&#8217;t done following copyright laws with proper citation, you may find yourself in legal trouble. Keep in mind that if you create content (whether it&#8217;s blog posts, articles, sales text, or even just meta tag descriptions) that is unique to your site, uses your identified keywords (in moderation) and is relevant to your site and your customer&#8217;s needs, you will reap great SEO rewards. </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/wsayXTzwv7M" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/content-strategies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>301 Redirects for SEO</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/301-redirects-seo</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/301-redirects-seo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.htaccess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the main problems that arise when doing SEO, updating content, or when redesigning a site, are URL&#8217;s that no longer work. When this happens not only are your customers subjected to broken links, but all search engine value the old page had is lost.
Best practice is to take those old URL&#8217;s, and all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the main problems that arise when doing SEO, updating content, or when redesigning a site, are URL&#8217;s that no longer work. When this happens not only are your customers subjected to broken links, but all search engine value the old page had is lost.</p>
<p>Best practice is to take those old URL&#8217;s, and all their traffic and inbound links, and redirect them to a new working URL.  This results in a win/win for your users and your search engine rankings.</p>
<p>That is where the 301 server redirection comes in.  Without getting technical a 301 redirect is a HTTP response from the server that means that the page has permanently moved to a new URL.  Setting up 301 redirection is pretty straight forward and easy to manage.</p>
<h3>301 Redirects and SEO</h3>
<p>The permenant redirection indicated by a 301 error is honored by search engines.  What this means is that when a search engine encounters a 301 redirect while crawling the web they will delist the old broken URL and update all the incomming links to the new URL.</p>
<p>Here is a short video by Mike Cutts from Google explaining how Google treats 301 redirects and anchor text.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/70LR8H8pn1M&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/70LR8H8pn1M&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<h3>301 Redirects Best Practices</h3>
<p>Currently what we suggest to all our clients is that any page that gets search engine traffic or that has a significant number of inbound links get a 301 redirect to a working page with similar or the same content.  This provides the best experience for surfers and maximizes the SEO value of their existing inbound links.</p>
<p>Any old pages that don&#8217;t get traffic or that have little to no inbound links should then be sent to a well designed and helpful 404 error page.  Since there is little value in these pages to be lost the purpose of this method is to maximize the user experience for those who stumble upon one of these pages.</p>
<p>Another popular alternative is to redirect these lesser used pages to the home page.  Doing this allows you to direct the inbound links and search engine rankings to a valuable page on the website.</p>
<p>The downside of this method is that potential customers may follow a link expecting to find something and instead find themselves on your home page.  This isn&#8217;t the best user experience and may result in a lost customer.</p>
<h3>Redirects on Apache Servers</h3>
<p>The simplist and most common ways to set up 301 redirects is through the <a href="http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/howto/htaccess.html">.htaccess file</a> in the home directory of your web server. Unlike javascript redirects .htaccess redirects are invisible to the surfer because they are executed by the server when the page is delivered.</p>
<h3>.htaccess Single Page Redirects</h3>
<p>Single page redirects are best used when the content on the old page is still available at a new location.  This way not only do you maintain all the inbound links and pagerank but visitors who arrive through external links find the information they were expecting.</p>
<p>When writing the redirect rule for a single page redirect you leave off the http://www and instead just include the path that would appear afterwords.  For exampe to redirect from the old page of http://www.site.com/old/page.html to http://www.site.com/new/page.html you would use &#8230;</p>
<p>Redirect 301 old/page.html http://www.site.com/new/page.html</p>
<p>Other 301 Redirects</p>
<p>There are many other ways to set up 301 redirects besides using an .htaccess file.  <a href="http://www.stevenhargrove.com/redirect-web-pages/">Steven Hargrove</a> has a great resource that covers all of them here.  If possible I highly recommend using .htaccess though because of how easy it is to set up and maintain.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/iq5VR-hRU3c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/301-redirects-seo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preventing Search Engine access with /robots.txt</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/robots-txt</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/robots-txt#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SummerLudwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots.txt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The /robots.txt file is simply a text file on your root directory that tells all &#8220;good&#8221; robots (the ones that aren&#8217;t fishing for email address or other spammy pursuits) what parts of your site to not index. By default all content that is accessible to a search engine spider is considered fair game.  Because of this a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The /robots.txt file is simply a text file on your root directory that tells all &#8220;good&#8221; robots (the ones that aren&#8217;t fishing for email address or other spammy pursuits) what parts of your site to not index. By default all content that is accessible to a search engine spider is considered fair game.  Because of this a /robots.txt file is only needed when you want to keep the search engines out of a particular directory.</p>
<p>It should also be noted that it is optional for search engines to follow the directives of the /robots.txt file.  Although all major search engines tend to comply with the robots.txt file there are plenty of spammy spiders that won&#8217;t.  For that reason the only sure fire way to protect content is to place password protection on the sensitive areas.</p>
<p>If you have something that you want to disallow search engine  spiders access to, but still allow unrestricted surfer access the best practice is to create a /robots.txt file in your root directory. That means the url to it should look like this:</p>
<pre>http://www.yourwebsite.com/robots.txt</pre>
<p>The following are examples of what should be contained in a /robots.txt file:</p>
<p>If you want to exclude ALL robots from your ENTIRE site:</p>
<pre>User-agent: *
Disallow: /</pre>
<p>If you want to exclude ALL robots from some content on your site:</p>
<pre>User-agent: *
Disallow: /cgi-bin/
Disallow: /tmp/
Disallow: /junk/</pre>
<p>If you want to disallow a single robot:</p>
<pre>User-agent: EvilRobot
Disallow: /</pre>
<p>IF you want to let ONE robot in:</p>
<pre>User-agent: GoogleBot
Disallow:</pre>
<pre>User-agent: *
Disallow: /</pre>
<p>The <strong>user-agent</strong> field is used to identify the bot you would like to allow/deny access. The <strong>*</strong> character is a wild card character and stands for &#8220;any&#8221;. Please note that if there is a part of your site that is private it should be password protected even if you use /robots.txt to disallow crawling of the page. /robots.txt is NOT enforceable and although legitimate spiders of search engines will follow its directives, not all bots are benign.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also important to know that just because you have excluded content from being crawled, search engine results can still contain the urls to that content. This is because the spiders may have spotted links to your content from other sites with anchor text suggesting your uncrawled url may be good for that term. Below is a great video from <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/">Matt Cutts</a> showing how that works.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBdEwpRQRD0&amp;feature=player_embedded"></a><a href="&lt;span class=&quot;mceItemObject&quot;  width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;344\&quot;&gt;&lt;span  name=\&quot;movie\&quot; value=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/KBdEwpRQRD0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1\&quot; class=&quot;mceItemParam&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;span  name=\&quot;allowFullScreen\&quot; value=\&quot;true\&quot; class=&quot;mceItemParam&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;span  name=\&quot;allowScriptAccess\&quot; value=\&quot;always\&quot; class=&quot;mceItemParam&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;mceItemEmbed&quot;  src=&quot;\&quot; mce_src=&quot;\&quot;&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/KBdEwpRQRD0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1\&quot; type=\&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash\&quot; allowfullscreen=\&quot;true\&quot; allowScriptAccess=\&quot;always\&quot; width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;344\&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;">Uncrawled URLs in Search Results &#8211; Matt Cutts</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/j9zQ4C-Lf6k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/robots-txt/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Personalized Search: The Big Change that Changes Nothing</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/google-personalized-search-the-big-change-that-changes-nothing</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/google-personalized-search-the-big-change-that-changes-nothing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday while I was dying from the plague Google announced they are rolling out personalized search to all users.  Now everyone searching Google, logged in or out, will get back results that are personalized based on their past searches.  Sounds kind of creepy but should actually result in a better user experience. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Friday while I was dying from the plague Google announced they are rolling out personalized search to all users.  Now everyone searching Google, logged in or out, will get back results that are personalized based on their past searches.  Sounds kind of creepy but should actually result in a better user experience.  It&#8217;s not like we were under the delusion that Google wasn&#8217;t keeping our search history before, right.</p>
<p>So to put this is perspective this is a MAJOR change in how Google works.  Before you could do a search and be relatively confident that someone else would see pretty much the same results. We could also research our competition much easier because a simple search for our targeted keywords pointed them right out to us.  Now we can&#8217;t be so sure anymore.</p>
<p>This change has created a wave of doom and gloomers who are taking to the streets in dirty rags, holding up &#8220;The End is Here&#8221; signs.  If you have been in or around the SEO industry for any length of time you know the type.  They appear every time anything changes, no matter how trivial.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-303" href="http://erayne.com/blog/google-personalized-search-the-big-change-that-changes-nothing/attachment/dont-panic"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-303" title="dont-panic" src="http://erayne.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/dont-panic.jpg" alt="dont-panic" width="450" height="351" /></a></p>
<p>The truth is that even though this is going to be a big change in user experience, its a non-change for SEO.  No matter how much Google personalizes search results the basic elements that form the core of SEO will still be just as important as before.  Solid unique content, strong site structure, domain authority, and linkbuilding.</p>
<p>Here are some excellent resources on this change and what it may mean to the SEO industry.</p>
<ul>
<li>HuoMah SEO Blog &#8220;<a href="http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/The-SEO-guide-to-Google-personalized-search.html  ">The SEO guide to Google personalized search</a>&#8220;</li>
<li>Search Engine Land &#8220;<a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-now-personalizes-everyones-search-results-31195  ">Google now Personalizes Everyone&#8217;s Search Results</a>&#8221; by Danny Sullivan</li>
<li>Search Engine Land &#8220;<a href="http://searchengineland.com/googles-personalized-results-the-new-normal-31290  ">Google’s Personalized Results: The “New Normal” That Deserves Extraordinary Attention</a>&#8221; by Danny Sullivan</li>
<li>Graywolf&#8217;s SEO Blog &#8220;<a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-personalized-search-news/">Eric Schmidt, The Wall Street Journal and Personalized Search</a>&#8221; by Michael Gray</li>
</ul>
<p>SEO has never been, and never will be, rocket science but it is hard work. Put in the work, invest the time, deliver an excellent product, get out there and market yourself, and the rest will take care of itself.  For all the changes that personalized search bring, none of them change what we do as SEO professionals, web developers, or designers.  Stop crying and go back to work.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/_JvrC4q9fhM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/google-personalized-search-the-big-change-that-changes-nothing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO and XML Sitemaps</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-and-xml-sitemaps</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-and-xml-sitemaps#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As defined at sitemaps.org &#8220;Sitemaps are an easy way for webmasters to inform search engines about pages on their sites that are available for crawling&#8221;.  A sitemap is an XML document that typically is placed at the root level.  The document contains information on the site structure and contents for search engines.
Normally, whether or not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As defined at sitemaps.org &#8220;Sitemaps are an easy way for webmasters to inform search engines about pages on their sites that are available for crawling&#8221;.  A sitemap is an XML document that typically is placed at the root level.  The document contains information on the site structure and contents for search engines.</p>
<p>Normally, whether or not you have a sitemap, a search engine discovers the contents of your website by following links.  Those links can be on outside websites, or they can be on your own website.  As long as there are links pointed to a page and your website has good content odds are very good that a search engine will quickly discover the page all on their own.</p>
<p>This brings up the question of whether or not a sitemap is necessary.  If a search engine will find everything without one why bother.  My personal opinion is that if a sitemap can be created automatically, like through a plugin or module, then go for it.  However if you have to create one manually I have a hard time justifying that much work for something of negligable use.</p>
<p>The reason I belive that is because if your site is structured in a way that a sitemap is necessary for search engines to find their way around you have already failed.  One of the core foundations of a solid SEO strategy is to have an easy to navigate website.  Since search engines navigate the same way as surfers if a search engine can&#8217;t find it, neither can your customers.</p>
<p>Adding a sitemap to a good website will likely produce no results at all.  Adding a sitemap to a poor website may alert search engines to content they couldn&#8217;t find before.  However that page is highly unlikely to ever show up in search results because it would lack incomming links.  I have yet to see a study that showed that the presence of a sitemap resulted in any SEO advantages that wouldn&#8217;t be better fixed in other ways.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/Y_XEfh0RF0s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-and-xml-sitemaps/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO and Canonicalization</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-and-canonicalization</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-and-canonicalization#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canonicalization is the term Google uses to describe the process of picking the best URL when there are more than one for the same content.  For example the typical website homepage i.e. http://www.sample.com normally has four possible URL&#8217;s.
Those four links would normally be &#8230;

http://www.sample.com
http://sample.com
http://www.sample.com/index.php (or whatever)
http://sample.com/index.php

So what we have are in essence four different web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canonicalization is the term Google uses to describe the process of picking the best URL when there are more than one for the same content.  For example the typical website homepage i.e. http://www.sample.com normally has four possible URL&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Those four links would normally be &#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>http://www.sample.com</li>
<li>http://sample.com</li>
<li>http://www.sample.com/index.php (or whatever)</li>
<li>http://sample.com/index.php</li>
</ul>
<p>So what we have are in essence four different web pages, each gathering their own backlinks, but each one most likely having the exact same content.  As a website owner or SEO this is obviuosly not something you want.  The search engines also don&#8217;t want 4 versions of every single page cluttering up their databases.</p>
<p>This is where canonicalization comes in.  Canonicalization gives you the power to choose which version you want to have the search engines use.  It&#8217;s important that you make this choice for the search engines though because if you don&#8217;t, they will.  While Google and other search engines are pretty good about deciding which version is best, its still better for us to retain as much control as possible.</p>
<p>To do this we will be using the canonical tag.</p>
<p>&lt;link rel=&#8221;canonical&#8221; href=&#8221;http://www.sample.com&#8221; /&gt;</p>
<p>This tag is used inside of the &lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt; tags and will indicate to search engines which of the versions you want them to link to.  You are then free to begin building links to your preferred version without worrying that some site somewhere will add links to the wrong one that you won&#8217;t get credit for.</p>
<p>I know there are probibly a few more questions but instead of repeating information Google has provided here are the links.</p>
<p>Matt Cutts on &#8220;<a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-url-canonicalization/">SEO advice: url canonicalization</a>&#8221;<br />
Google Webmaster Central Blog on &#8220;<a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html">Specify your canonical</a>&#8220;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/TGeTnmN3rQ4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-and-canonicalization/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>URL Structure Tips for SEO</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/url-structure-tips-for-seo</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/url-structure-tips-for-seo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today were going to talk about something that you may or may not have any control over.  The URL structure of your website.  I am going to make the assumption that you are using one of the more popular content management systems and give some simple tips for each.  If you&#8217;re not then I would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today were going to talk about something that you may or may not have any control over.  The URL structure of your website.  I am going to make the assumption that you are using one of the more popular content management systems and give some simple tips for each.  If you&#8217;re not then I would highly recommend looking at one of them.</p>
<p>We use Wordpress for almost every website that we create and have also used Drupal and Joomla.  All three of these are free, open source, have huge support systems, and thousands of free themes.  Using a CMS like Wordpress cuts down on our development time by at least half and saves our clients thousands of dollars.</p>
<h3>General Tips</h3>
<h4>Human Readable URL&#8217;s</h4>
<p>Human Readable: www.site.com/category-name/page-name<br />
Not Human Readable: www.site.com/index.php?cat=1&amp;page=356</p>
<p>Making your URL&#8217;s human readable has a couple of huge benefits.  First, it allows your customers to understand your site structure by looking at where they are. Secondly the URL will naturally contain keywords that search engines can read and use to rank your page.</p>
<h4>Use Hyphens instead of Underscores</h4>
<p>If possible use hyphens for spaces instead of underscores.  Not only are hyphens easier for your surfers to read but search engines generally understand that a hyphen breaks up two separate words.</p>
<h4>Short and Sweet</h4>
<p>The limit on URL length seems to be around 2,000 characters before browsers won&#8217;t display them.  For practical purposes though the shorter the better.  A good rule of thumb is to remove all non-essential words from the url that you can.  Common stop words like a, and, the, or, of and so forth can all be removed.  Creating a short and keyword rich URL is a major foundation in on page SEO.</p>
<h3>Wordpress Tips</h3>
<p>Wordpress comes standard with the ability to specifiy your url structure which Wordpress calls Permalinks.  This page on the Wordpress codex explains the basics.  The permalinks that I tend to use most are</p>
<pre>/%category%/%postname%</pre>
<p>I have found that this permalink code gives me nice clean URL&#8217;s.  I then edit the post slug when writing to eleminate extra words which allows me full control over my URL.</p>
<h3>Drupal Tips</h3>
<p>Drupal also comes standard with the ability to construct what they call Friendly URL&#8217;s.  There is also a popular module <a href="http://drupal.org/project/pathauto">Pathauto</a> that will handle this automatically and I highly recommend it.  The Pathauto module uses patterns much like Wordpress to build the URL structure.  These patterns are detailed <a href="http://drupal.org/node/124462">on this page</a> in the Drupal documentation.</p>
<h3>Other CMS&#8217;s, Shopping Carts, Forums, etc</h3>
<p>Most other Content Management Systems have the ability to edit the URL structure or have add ons that do.  It is very important to good SEO to have a consistant and keyword rich URL so I highly recommend looking into the options you have on your CMS.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/bMeMQbDt30A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/url-structure-tips-for-seo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Tips for Description Meta Tag</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-description-meta-tag</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-description-meta-tag#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The description meta tag is intended to provide the text search engines should use along with your title when displaying search results.  Of course, as with most things in SEO this does not always happen.  Many search engines, Google included, will sometimes create their own description that they feel better match the search query.
&#60;meta name="description" content="your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The description meta tag is intended to provide the text search engines should use along with your title when displaying search results.  Of course, as with most things in SEO this does not always happen.  Many search engines, Google included, will sometimes create their own description that they feel better match the search query.</p>
<pre>&lt;meta name="description" content="your unique page description" /&gt;</pre>
<p>Descriptions should be targeted at the surfer to entice them to your listing because most search engines give low ( if any ) weight to the description tag for ranking purposes.  The primary value of the description tag is that it allows you to partially control how your listings display in results.  If you provide compelling, unique, and accurate descriptions you will attract more search visitors.</p>
<p>An optimized description meta tag should follow these simple guideleines.</p>
<ol>
<li>Unique description tag for every page</li>
<li>Use your primary keyword phrase once in the description</li>
<li>Accurately describe the page to reduce bounce rate</li>
</ol>
<p>Unlike in the title tag there really are no &#8220;advanced SEO&#8221; tips for the meta description.  Search engines, with the exception of Yahoo, place low to no ranking value on the description meta tag.  Instead spend a few minutes creating a unique description that will appeal to searchers and then move on to something that will provide greater SEO returns.</p>
<p>The only time I would suggest revisiting the description tag is if you&#8217;re receiving significantly lower search engine traffic than your search position should be providing.  In that case, some optimization of the description may result in a higher click through rate.</p>
<p>Again, I wouldn&#8217;t consider this unless I was in a top 5 position.  Before that any time spent optimizing the description could be better spent building links or developing content to increase your rankings.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/qZYtw3Yjerg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-description-meta-tag/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO for the Keyword Meta Tag</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-keyword-meta-tag</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-keyword-meta-tag#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nefarious keyword tag has created more confusion and stress in webmasters and SEOs alike than any other meta tag.  Endless questions of who supports it, who doesn&#8217;t, how many keywords should I use, do I use commas or not, and thousands more are asked on webmaster forums every single day.  There have been a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nefarious keyword tag has created more confusion and stress in webmasters and SEOs alike than any other meta tag.  Endless questions of who supports it, who doesn&#8217;t, how many keywords should I use, do I use commas or not, and thousands more are asked on webmaster forums every single day.  There have been a great many wonderful articles written to clear up these questions but they still get asked.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to bother writing yet another of those articles. Personally I HATE this tag.  Not because of the tag itself, its really nice and non-offensive.  No I hate it because of all the inane questions, bad information, and scammy tactics that are the results of this tag.  If your wanting some information on the current state of the tag here are 3 wonderful examples if your wondering.</p>
<p>Here is Matt Cutts from Google saying that &#8220;<a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/keywords-meta-tag-in-web-search/">Google doesn&#8217;t use the keyword meta tag in web search</a>&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/keyword-meta-tags">What’s The Best Keyword Meta Tags Formula?</a> by Shaun Anderson (hobo)<br />
Even Yahoo, who supported the tag much longer than anyone else are <a href="http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-search-no-longer-uses-meta-keywords-tag-27303">dropping support</a> (<a href="http://searchengineland.com/sorry-yahoo-you-do-index-the-meta-keywords-tag-27743#">or are they?</a>).</p>
<p>So with no search engines of note using the keyword meta tag to influence rankings anymore what should we do with it?  The easy answer is to forget all about it.  In large part that is what I have done on a lot of our sites and the sites we manage.  So far we haven&#8217;t noticed any negative effects at all.</p>
<p>But, there is one use that I will highly recommend for the keyword meta tag.  <strong>Misspellings</strong>.</p>
<p>Currently Yahoo and most likely the others as well are indexing the keyword meta tag as normal text with a really low ranking factor.  Because of this I would recommend using the keywords tag for common misspellings of your business name, product name, or anything else that you would rank for normally.  Since you wouldn&#8217;t want to use the misspellings on your page hiding them in the keyword tag allows the search engines to relate the misseplling to your page.</p>
<p>Either that or just forget about them.  Thats what I do.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/sE8fADIHJ6A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-keyword-meta-tag/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Tips for the Title Tag</title>
		<link>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-tips-title-tag</link>
		<comments>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-tips-title-tag#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erayne.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title tag is one of the meta elements contained in the &#60;head&#62;&#60;/head&#62; portion of your page code.  Unsurprisingly, the title tag is used as the title of the page.  As such it will appear as the page title in search engine results, on the browser, and in bookmarks.  Since the title tag appears so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title tag is one of the meta elements contained in the &lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt; portion of your page code.  Unsurprisingly, the title tag is used as the title of the page.  As such it will appear as the page title in search engine results, on the browser, and in bookmarks.  Since the title tag appears so many places it is important that they are written primarily for your visitors.</p>
<pre>&lt;title&gt;Title goes between opening and closing tags&lt;/title&gt;</pre>
<p>An optimized title tag will follow these three simple guidelines &#8230;</p>
<ol>
<li>Title tag should be unique, readable to humans, and accurately describe the page&#8217;s content.</li>
<li>Title tag should include your primary keyword phrase that the page is being optimized for</li>
<li>Title tag should be 64 characters or less to work best in all search engines.</li>
</ol>
<p>A lot has been written about the optimal way to do titles in order to squeeze the most SEO juice out of them.  Personally I feel that if you just follow those three simple guidelines you will be getting 99% out of the tag.   If you want to go out and try and get that last 1% here are a few more suggestions that may help.</p>
<ol>
<li>Place your keyword phrase as early in the title as possible</li>
<li>Place your site/company name at the end since you already rank well for that (hopefully)</li>
<li>Experiment with special characters in the title.  It won&#8217;t help SEO but may make your site more noticeable in search results.</li>
</ol>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty much it for the title tag.  Despite its importance  it is a very simple tag to get right.  Just remember the 3 simple guidelines and keep the title readable for your users.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EdwardRayne/~4/VxdlEKukpSI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://erayne.com/blog/seo-tips-title-tag/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.456 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-09 19:56:00 --><!-- Compression = gzip -->
