<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Edzard Ernst	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edzardernst.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edzardernst.com</link>
	<description>MD, PhD, MAE, FMedSci, FRCP, FRCPEd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Antidotes in Homeopathy: Classical Doctrine, Clinical Relevance and Scientific Reinterpretation by RPGNo1		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RPGNo1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30150#comment-159365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159358&quot;&gt;Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH&lt;/a&gt;.

@Dullman

You KNOW that homeopathy works, but you cannot PROVE it. I KNOW that you are a pompous braggart, charlatan and snake-oil salesman, and I can PROVE it, too. :P]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159358">Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH</a>.</p>
<p>@Dullman</p>
<p>You KNOW that homeopathy works, but you cannot PROVE it. I KNOW that you are a pompous braggart, charlatan and snake-oil salesman, and I can PROVE it, too. 😛</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on  The stupidity of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. runs deeper than I feared by RPGNo1		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/the-stupidity-of-robert-f-kennedy-jr-runs-deeper-than-i-feared/#comment-159364</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RPGNo1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30173#comment-159364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do Rogan and Kennedy actually know that there are no jury trials in Germany at all and that all cases are decided exclusively by professional judges? What a nightmare! *wink, wink*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do Rogan and Kennedy actually know that there are no jury trials in Germany at all and that all cases are decided exclusively by professional judges? What a nightmare! *wink, wink*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Antidotes in Homeopathy: Classical Doctrine, Clinical Relevance and Scientific Reinterpretation by DavidB		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DavidB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30150#comment-159363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159358&quot;&gt;Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH&lt;/a&gt;.

A hundred times I have asked you Mr Ullman, a hundred times......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159358">Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH</a>.</p>
<p>A hundred times I have asked you Mr Ullman, a hundred times&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Antidotes in Homeopathy: Classical Doctrine, Clinical Relevance and Scientific Reinterpretation by Talker		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Talker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 18:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30150#comment-159361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159360&quot;&gt;Richard Rasker&lt;/a&gt;.

Allow me to play Dullman&#039;s advocate and answer your question.... Homeopaths are tuned into the aura of their patients. They also ask their patients to describe their dreams and feelings. A little astrology doesnt hurt either.  People like you who are ignorant of homeopathic medicine wouldn&#039;t understand in a million years. Kapish?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159360">Richard Rasker</a>.</p>
<p>Allow me to play Dullman&#8217;s advocate and answer your question&#8230;. Homeopaths are tuned into the aura of their patients. They also ask their patients to describe their dreams and feelings. A little astrology doesnt hurt either.  People like you who are ignorant of homeopathic medicine wouldn&#8217;t understand in a million years. Kapish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Antidotes in Homeopathy: Classical Doctrine, Clinical Relevance and Scientific Reinterpretation by Richard Rasker		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Rasker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 17:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30150#comment-159360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159358&quot;&gt;Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH&lt;/a&gt;.

@Dana Ullman
&lt;blockquote&gt;Each person can be sensitive to different substances.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Aha, so THAT is why homeopathy never works when it is investigated by real scientists and real doctors: they always choose the wrong (read: insensitive) patients! And let me guess: this sensitivity can come and go even with individual patients.

This begs the following question: how do you water-shaking clowns know what a particular patient is and isn&#039;t sensitive to? After all, this &#039;sensitivity&#039; has never been conclusively observed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159358">Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH</a>.</p>
<p>@Dana Ullman</p>
<blockquote><p>Each person can be sensitive to different substances.</p></blockquote>
<p>Aha, so THAT is why homeopathy never works when it is investigated by real scientists and real doctors: they always choose the wrong (read: insensitive) patients! And let me guess: this sensitivity can come and go even with individual patients.</p>
<p>This begs the following question: how do you water-shaking clowns know what a particular patient is and isn&#8217;t sensitive to? After all, this &#8216;sensitivity&#8217; has never been conclusively observed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Antidotes in Homeopathy: Classical Doctrine, Clinical Relevance and Scientific Reinterpretation by Edzard		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edzard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 15:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30150#comment-159359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159358&quot;&gt;Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH&lt;/a&gt;.

... yes, and we non-homeopaths [i.e. the rest of the world] KNOW that finding the correct remedy if futile. How come? Because we have the evidence to show that homeopathy is BS [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03882-w]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159358">Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH</a>.</p>
<p>&#8230; yes, and we non-homeopaths [i.e. the rest of the world] KNOW that finding the correct remedy if futile. How come? Because we have the evidence to show that homeopathy is BS [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03882-w]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Antidotes in Homeopathy: Classical Doctrine, Clinical Relevance and Scientific Reinterpretation by Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 15:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30150#comment-159358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow...Edzie...you have the great ability to over-simplifying homeopathy and in creating the straw man!

We homeopaths KNOW that finding the correct remedy is challenging because it must be individually prescribed according to the unique SYNDROME of symptoms that the patient is experiencing.  And because the vast majority of homeopathic patients are paying OUT OF POCKET, we MUST provide RESULTS or people will stop seeking our care.

And NONE of the antidotes that you list will antidote everyone.  Each person can be sensitive to different substances.

You embarrass yourself by your ignorance of homeopathy and the homeopathic methodology.  You claim to be &quot;trained&quot; in homeopathy...but you also never completed this training or were ever certified in the field.  The bottomline is that you&#039;ve never proved you understood anything that you were supposedly taught.

It is no wonder that you create straw men and over-simplified interpretations of homeopathy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;Edzie&#8230;you have the great ability to over-simplifying homeopathy and in creating the straw man!</p>
<p>We homeopaths KNOW that finding the correct remedy is challenging because it must be individually prescribed according to the unique SYNDROME of symptoms that the patient is experiencing.  And because the vast majority of homeopathic patients are paying OUT OF POCKET, we MUST provide RESULTS or people will stop seeking our care.</p>
<p>And NONE of the antidotes that you list will antidote everyone.  Each person can be sensitive to different substances.</p>
<p>You embarrass yourself by your ignorance of homeopathy and the homeopathic methodology.  You claim to be &#8220;trained&#8221; in homeopathy&#8230;but you also never completed this training or were ever certified in the field.  The bottomline is that you&#8217;ve never proved you understood anything that you were supposedly taught.</p>
<p>It is no wonder that you create straw men and over-simplified interpretations of homeopathy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Antidotes in Homeopathy: Classical Doctrine, Clinical Relevance and Scientific Reinterpretation by Richard Rasker		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/antidotes-in-homeopathy-classical-doctrine-clinical-relevance-and-scientific-reinterpretation/#comment-159356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Rasker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 07:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30150#comment-159356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Has anyone seen a reaction to a homeopathic remedy that is too strong and needs moderation?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, if you read &#039;homeopathy&#039; instead of &#039;homeopathic remedy&#039;, then your blog fits the bill: &lt;a href=&quot;https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bd/Much_Ado_Quarto.JPG/500px-Much_Ado_Quarto.JPG&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;strong reactions galore&lt;/a&gt;, absolutely prompting the need for moderation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Has anyone seen a reaction to a homeopathic remedy that is too strong and needs moderation?</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, if you read &#8216;homeopathy&#8217; instead of &#8216;homeopathic remedy&#8217;, then your blog fits the bill: <a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bd/Much_Ado_Quarto.JPG/500px-Much_Ado_Quarto.JPG" rel="nofollow ugc">strong reactions galore</a>, absolutely prompting the need for moderation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Clinical trials from China cannot be trusted &#8211; an update by Peter		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/05/clinical-trials-from-china-cannot-be-trusted-an-update/#comment-159354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 04:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30133#comment-159354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You don&#039;t trust clinical trials from china, but you trust an AI?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t trust clinical trials from china, but you trust an AI?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on  The stupidity of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. runs deeper than I feared by Will		</title>
		<link>https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/the-stupidity-of-robert-f-kennedy-jr-runs-deeper-than-i-feared/#comment-159353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 02:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edzardernst.com/?p=30173#comment-159353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/the-stupidity-of-robert-f-kennedy-jr-runs-deeper-than-i-feared/#comment-159351&quot;&gt;Mojo&lt;/a&gt;.

Something of a Shibboleth?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://edzardernst.com/2026/06/the-stupidity-of-robert-f-kennedy-jr-runs-deeper-than-i-feared/#comment-159351">Mojo</a>.</p>
<p>Something of a Shibboleth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
