Email Experience Blog

Spreadshirt (and Durham) Rocks!

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:35:00 PDT

Does a personalized subject line work?

Back in my Bronto days, I blogged about personalized subject lines. I provided a generic "It depends" as my answer ... followed by a more detailed explanation. Since that post more than a year ago, I've continued to receive emails that include personalized subject lines. However, most of those emails use my first name as the "hook" to get me to open. This never works for me. Never. I know it's fake. I know it's not genuine. I know it's a "mail merge" of sorts.

Then, the other day, I received this email from Spreadshirt.

Why This Email Rocks

First off, I love Spreadshirt. I love their emails. I love their subject lines. I love their products. I love their humor. Love. Love. Love. So what makes this email rock? Check out the subject line (Durham Rocks!). At some point, I must have entered my city of residence in a preference field. I honestly can't recall doing so, but the folks at Spreadshirt somehow know (I moved from Durham 4 months ago. More on that later).

Spreadshirt accomplished objective #1. I opened the email. Why? Because - even though I don't still live there - I love Durham. It does rock.

Spreadshirt accomplished objective #2. I read the email. The entire thing. Why did I read it? First off, it was short and to the point. It had a main call to action ("Create Your Hometown Shirt") that was clear and catchy. They added a bit of spice/humor to the copy. They closed with 4 ways to follow them via various social networks.

Assuming those were really the first two objectives, they won. Now, I didn't click. I didn't create my own shirt. But...I did write this blog post. I did tell a few friends about it. I will continue to love Spreadshirt. And, equally as important, when the time is right, I will buy from Spreadshirt. They are definitely "top of mind."

Some Caveats

I'd be remiss if I didn't offer some constructive criticism for Spreashirt. I have 3 suggestions.

1. Images Off: The email is not terrible if images are not enabled, but it's not great. Here's why - the main call to action "Create Your Hometown Shirt" - is a button and therefore is not visible unless images are turned on. It should be a bulletproof button (Ask Lisa Harmon).

2. I Don't Live in Durham Anymore: This is not really Spreadshirt's fault. I mean, how would they know I moved 4 months ago? That being said, don't forget to send the occasional email that asks subscribers to update their preferences. Make sure you tell them why and what's in it for them.

3. Follow Spreadshirt On...: I love this concept. They have buttons/images and links. They describe briefly what I'll get (set expectations). They cover the main "social networks" - Blog, Twitter, Facebook, Flickr. However, Spreadshirt may want to consider moving these "follow" options up a bit. Mabye put them on the right or left navigation? They may get lost a little on the bottom of the email.

---------

So what do you think? Does Spreadshirt rock? For those that live or have lived in Durham, does Durham rock? (I think so).

- DJ Waldow, Director of Community, Blue Sky Factory
DJ Waldow is the Director of Community at Blue Sky Factory, an ESP and an eec Silver Sponsor based in Baltimore. With over 4 years of experience in email marketing, DJ is active in the twittersphere (@djwaldow), on blogs (blog.blueskyfactory.com), and in the social media space. He's an regular contributor to the Email Marketers Club and other email-related social networks. DJ resides in Salt Lake City, Utah where he can be found thinking, eating, and breathing email.

Email Nirvana Q&A with Jeanniey Mullen and Loren McDonald

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:39:00 PDT

If you attended this week's Email Nirvana Webinar, you heard eec member Loren McDonald and founder Jeanniey Mullen give quite a presentation. It was so captivating that they almost didn’t have time for questions. But they wanted to make sure everyone’s concerns and questions were heard and so they agreed to answer some of the most frequently asked questions right here on the eec blog! More questions and answers can be reviewed on the Silverpop and OMS blogs as well. We will add the links soon.

Now, on to the questions...

How many words do you recommend for effective subject lines? I would think it would be 7 or less - any suggestions?

This is a great question, and one that can't really be answered easily. The real answer is, it depends on what the message is that you are trying to convey. Key points to remember when determining subject lines are: 1) Don't be cute- while you know what is inside the email and why your subject line might be a pun on the contents, no one else has opened it yet. They wont get the joke. The more direct the better. 2) Get to the point. Whether 7 words or 11, covey the main reason why you want people to open your email to avoid disappointment when they actually do. 3) There is no need to put your company name in the SL unless it is not in the from address. They just saw the email was from XYZ. They don't need to see that in the SL too. Start with these points, and test your way into improvements. Also- check out the eec whitepaper room for more subject line specific research and case studies.

What do you do if your emails are only relevant for a certain amount of time?

I love this question. Actually… emails never die. You might have seen this on TV in Law and Order, or some other crime show. You know, the part where the crime lab takes a computer that was on fire and somehow is able to restore emails? Well, believe it or not, the same is true for marketing emails. We have done studies at the eec where people show they will store an email from a brand that interests them for up to 2 years. The messages specific relevancy by that point has come and gone, but the brand impact is everlasting. If your emails are only relevant for a short time you have one of two options: 1- add value added help links that make the content evergreen and give someone a reason to save your emails for years, or 2- test swapping out the non-relevant images behind the scenes and create and email that updates it’s own content whenever opened, every so often.

Tips for B2B?

Anything you heard or saw in the webinar is true for B2B as well. B2B readers are also customers dealing with the same overloading email boxes, priority pressures and need to feel special that we all do in our personal lives. Start with a great B2C concept and email the eec for help if you need to/want to adjust for B2B.

What is the importance of the metrics particularly if you are emailing from a non-profit?

Metrics are important for any industry or vertical when it comes to email. They enable to you to, at the very least, set a benchmark for how your effort compare to other entities. One key measurement I enjoy reviewing is the click to open rate (what percentage of people who open your email click on the link). This lets you gauge how well your segmentation and targeting strategy are working. If less than 25% of these who open click, you are not reaching an engaged audience. Every year, the eec gathers a volunteer team of the best minds in email to help a npf improve their email. You can read the case studies right here on the eec site.

Are subscribers likely to fill out a form with all of those questions? How do you entice them to do so without making them skeptical about why you want the information?

This is always a tough question to answer because it is a business decision. Shorter forms get more completes, but lower quality. Longer forms drive more serious traffic. MotleyFool is one company who manages long forms very well. They incent people part way through. Ex Give us your email and name and get our email newsletter. When you do they say “thanks, now give us your mailing address and we will also send you a free whitepaper…. This happens many times until you unknowingly and happily have given every piece of personal information you have in small bits in return for value added products. Definitely worth a test.

Is Email Video Ready for Prime Time Viewing? Or Still Just a Pilot Program?

Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:09:00 PDT

Video in email. Not a week goes by without a webinar, blog or email newsletter mentioning the topic. But is video in email the real deal? Or is it still too early to start whipping out the camcorders and hiring scriptwriters?

To get a better handle on the topic, I turned to ClickMail Marketing’s CTO, Cameron Kane, for some insight. Cameron is paying close attention to the video vibe and was deploying video for clients way before the hype. But whether or not video is ready for prime time is the topic I asked him to speak upon.

First off, Cameron says you need to be clear on your motivation. Video can be a good tool to engage prospects or re-engage existing customers. But make sure you’ll use it that way. Ask yourself, “Will this really help me engage the customer or am I doing this because it’s the next shiny new thing?”

Next, Cameron cautions being aware of the different ways to deliver video. Which method you choose depends in part on your audience and in part on how much success you want.

As a static image that clicks through to video on a landing page – This is an image with a Play arrow on it indicating it will start a video. The video starts playing upon the click through.
As an animated .gif that plays in the email – Cameron says this is a good way to go if you can get the point of your short video across without sound. “It should be used as more of a lure than the full-blown video,” he says. But it will not play if images are suppressed. And it only shows the first frame in Microsoft Outlook 2007, so when you’re creating it, you must make your first frame a static image with an arrow (as above) so the user can click through. For this reason, it’s a bad choice if you’re a B2B marketer as so many business people use Outlook.
As certified video that plays in the email with audio (AOL only) – Right now this applies only to AOL, although other ISPs are joining, like Comcast. “I think the expansion into ISPs needs to widen a tad before we can really speak to this,” says Cameron. “The home run is if they can get Hotmail, Livemail and Gmail. Then video will be pervasive,” he says. Certified video has just come onto the scene and it will be very interesting in watching this playout. The implications on this front go wide and far. I think the best has yet to come.
As embedded Flash video: “Very bad idea,” says Cameron. “We could do this 5 years ago, but no longer.”

Of the four choices above, Cameron recommends using the static image for a B2B audience. If the audience is B2C, he says, start with an animated .gif and do an A/B split test. If the animated .gif works, filter your AOL audience and if that audience is big enough and a lift in revenue would be significant, use the certified video for that segment. “I would see this option as the best for large retailers,” he says. Although he also points out Goodmail hasn’t done their homework yet on the effectiveness of video and whether or not there’s a lift in ROI. “They don’t have conclusive data as of yet on the lift a sender would receive if using video,” he points out.

If you use video in your email marketing, there are still email best practices to adhere to. Just because you’re adapting a new approach and technology doesn’t mean the old rules no longer apply. Things to keep in mind when using video in your email marketing include:

You still have to be relevant and targeted
It’s still email. You’re still trying to get the recipient to do something, to take some kind of action
You still have to measure its impact
You still have to test
You have to consider bandwidth and rendering issues

Most of all, perhaps, and this is where the discussion about video in email gets fuzzy, you have to consider image blocking. A recent webinar on video in email hardly spent 10 seconds on the topic, but the reality is, if your recipients have images suppressed, it doesn’t matter which method you choose to deliver your video in the email: They won’t see it.

As Cameron says, “You have to get them to download images, then view the email and video, then click through. This is all before they hopefully convert. There’s lots of room for drop out.”

So maybe it’s worth waiting a while before you “drop in” to the video in email camp.

- Marco Marini, CEO, ClickMail Marketing

The 2009 Email Marketing Haiku Slam Wants You!

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:33:00 PDT

Email done quite well
Is loved by ISPs
And subscribers too

Okay, so I'm not the Shakespeare of the haiku world yet. If you can do better, your creativity could win you a one-year membership in the Email Experience Council, a $399 value and a great way to connect with your fellow email marketers, download resources and improve your email skills.

To say nothing, of course, of the thrill of seeing your content entry displayed on the eec site for the world to appreciate and envy (more on that later).

It all started when a group of self-described "email snobs" started talking via Twitter and blog posts/comments about the language we use to talk about email marketing. Some of the conversation was inspired in part by my latest Email Insider column, "Warning: Blasting May Be Harmful to 'Our' Health."

On an email discussion list, someone posted a response to the conversation about language in the form of a haiku, which begat more haikus and eventually drew the eec into the fray. Now the eec is sponsoring the (sort of) official 2009 Haiku Slam, with eec members voting on the winners.

We're still working out the details, including the page at the eec site where you can view other entries. In the meantime, you can track various fun and serious discussions on email marketing via the hashtag #emailsnob - or Twitter search. Follow me - @LorenMcDonald – and @Silverpop and other participants, and we'll pass on the particulars as they become available. Feel free to contribute to the discussion, too.

Once you have crafted your contest entries, send them to Ali at the eec - aswerdlow at the-dma.org. Post 'em in the comments section here, too, if you're especially proud of them.

Here is another of my planned entries that might inspire your own creativity or your competitive spirit:

Blasts are from the past
And relevance they will kill
ROI, think not

Now, put down that coffee cup and start haiku-ing!

- Loren McDonald, Silverpop, an eec Silver Sponsor

Putting a Face With the Name

Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:00:00 PDT

More than ever, consumers are thinking about the necessity of their purchases before they part with their hard-earned dollars. Adding to the problem, 65% of Americans believe they are bombarded with too much advertising, according to the Art and Copy trailer. This becomes a major issue for email marketers who are trying to walk the fine line between inundating the inbox and delivering timely messages.

So, how do you convert consumers from window shoppers to buyers when there are so many companies vying for their affections? Simply step out from behind the corporate curtain and create a connection that's rooted in authenticity. One way to do this is to put a face with the name.

As the fashion visionary and Creative Director at J.Crew, Jenna Lyons is the ideal voice for the brand. By devoting an entire email to Jenna's Picks and supporting the story in-store, in the catalog and online, J.Crew is inviting people into her office to see what inspires her. Adding the quote from Jenna is yet another way to personalize the content and up the authenticity.

The founders of Serena & Lily take this a step further by devoting two separate emails to their distinct styles: Serena Hearts and Lily Loves. By incorporating a quote for each top pick, they create a conversation. Without the quotes, it would be a list of items without any personality. Of course, in both of these examples the assumption is that the quotes are real, and if they truly want to emanate authenticity then the words should be unedited, as though part of an interview or casual conversation.

Ann Taylor recently introduced their subscribers to Lisa, their new head designer, in a gorgeous email. It includes a quote, a pic of Lisa, and swatches from her inspiration board. Unfortunately, the story ended there. Clicking on the CTA under Lisa's photo dropped you straight into the shop path. Building out an online landing page where people might be able to learn about Lisa's inspiration would have been a spot-on execution.

Catering to the true fashionista who scours the web looking for the latest trends, Tobi delivers all kinds of editorial extras into this email. From taking subscribers behind the scenes at Velvet to strolling the San Francisco streets with their resident style scout, Tobi turns shopping into a full-on fashion experience. (On a best practices note, they fall short in some key areas, including SWYN and FTAF, which are major misses, especially when you consider the great content.)

At the other end of the authenticity spectrum, we have Old Navy's Super-modelquins campaign. Basically, their public-facing spokesperson, who supposedly embodies the Old Navy brand, is actually...a mannequin. While they've done their best to create personalities around these characters and make them more "human", the fact remains that they are plastic, so this comes off as fake and, to be honest, a little creepy.

Without a doubt, Banana Republic has a lock on classic and affordable go-to-work styles. While their emails are always polished to perfection, they feel the same week after week, whether they're featuring white shirts or the must-haves for fall. They get points for creating cool extras, like the City Stories short film competition and the Mad Men walk-on competition, but lose points for never letting their customers into the design studio. What was it that inspired them to make the white shirt the big staple for fall? Wouldn't it be fun to know?

Knowing who you are as a company and inviting consumers to see the face behind the name will help you navigate away from the corporate speak and towards a more casual conversation. In other words, keep it real. No one wants to feel like they're buying something that's generic and mass produced. By giving them a story behind the product, you're creating a connection for your consumer to carry with them every time they button up that shirt, slip on those sandals, or wear those must-have jeans.

- Darrah MacLean & Lisa Harmon - Smith-Harmon

AOL Ends Report Card Program

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:00:00 PDT

Christine Borgia from AOL announced this week that the long-standing Report Card program has come to an end. For those of us who have been in the email marketing world for any period of time, we know this marks the end of an era. I go way back with AOL from my previous role running email operations at Travelocity. I started back at the dawn of “email time” in 1999. I had the privilege of sending AOL Travel email, in addition to my regular Travelocity mail. This gave me some insider type access to the Postmaster Team at AOL. I won’t tell you that everything was always smooth. In fact, I had a pretty rocky year, one that I’ve tried to delete from my memory banks. Looking back, that was when the discipline of deliverability was born. AOL was way ahead of the curve in the implementation of the Report Card program. If you aren’t familiar with the Report Card, here’s a sample:

You are receiving this message via AOL's automated "Report Card" process because our available data indicate that in the last 24 hours your domain's mail stream has exceeded an inbox complaint rate of 0.30%. This email is only an indication that your domain's mail stream has exceeded a pre-defined complaint threshold; it is not necessarily indicative of a spam problem. We send a report card to every domain that exceeds this threshold, regardless of what type of mail is sent. We hope that it may be useful to help identify potential issues. For additional information please visit our http://postmaster.info.aol.com Postmaster website, where one can find a more detailed explanation of how the Report Card system works, AOL's technical requirements for sending email to us, AOL's best practices guidelines for bulk-mailers, and more.

This was really great stuff! Imagine an ISP sending you an email each day warning you that you had slipped into the danger zone. You didn’t have to build any reports, aggregate any data, or haggle over “hanging spams!” This kind of service just isn’t around anymore, and I fear we took it for granted. It means we’re back to “new school” techniques with AOL. Their feedback loop program is top-notch and has always been the leader in FBL technology. (You are signed up and watching your FBL complaints/statistics…aren’t you? Of course you are, because we all know that complaints are the bellwether statistic for email marketers.)

Goodbye, AOL Report Card. I will miss you. Actually, I will miss those days from long ago when a day without a Report Card meant we had aced our promotion. We were good enough, smart enough, and AOL liked us!!

- Kevin Senne, Director, Deliverability & Social Networking, Premiere Global Services, Inc.

Industry’s First Bounce Code Directory Now Available

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:00:00 PDT

In what we believe to be the first collection of bounce codes in one public location, the Get Satisfaction site is now the official home to the eec’s Deliverability Roundtable bounce string project. It is the culmination of many months worth of effort from industry veterans with experience in email deliverability and the technical aspects of sending and receiving email. We decided to place it here since the site allows for dynamic updates as codes change in time and also provides a forum in which users can discuss deliverability issues and receive insight from folks in the industry.

Why is this useful?
The most common form of communication for an ISP to communicate with a sender on a one-to-one ratio is a bounce message. If an email is successfully handed off to an ISP, a success bounce is issued (250 ok). However, if the message is not successfully handed off, an ISP will usually put pertinent information into a bounce message letting you know what the issue is and, in an ideal setting, what you need to do to avoid that bounce in the future. The more failure bounces you collect, the less mail is getting through to your recipients. If you’re concerned about the highest level of delivery penetration, you’ll review the bounce codes to spot trending and actionable items you can do to get your mail through to an ISP. That’s where this site comes into play. We’ve amassed a list of the following ISPs that have standard bounce codes you should be aware of. If you see a bounce from one of them, you should check the Get Satisfaction site to see if more information is available.

Hotmail/Live
Comcast
ATT/BellSouth/SBC
Yahoo
AOL

Who should use it?
Anyone who has a responsibility around message delivery, most likely your IT or development team, will want to take a look at this. Bounce messages are collected at the email server level so, unless your email application allows easy access to data in a useable format, you’ll need to have someone review the bounce messages at the server level to see the actual ISP message.

How do I use it?
Let’s say you send out a mailing today. After watching the initial delivery numbers, you see that Yahoo has taken a dip in delivery (meaning there’s a delta between the delivery numbers you’re seeing and what you usually expect). Either by using the ESP’s delivery tools or by having someone on your team provide the information, you discover there’s an accumulation of the following bounce strings queuing up on your outbound email server.

“451 Resources temporarily not available - Please try again later [#4.16.5]”

You then go to the new bounce site and search for this string. You should find the following match:

“What does bounce code 451 Resources temporarily not available - Please try again later [#4.16.5] from Yahoo mean?” (check it out).

After you click on the link, you see that this is a bounce message Yahoo! will serve up if their servers are over capacity and are pushing back on mail to allow them to catch up. This is not a sender related bounce but rather a Yahoo! infrastructure one – all you can do is retry the message later and hope Yahoo! has some available cycles at that time (which you should be doing on most soft bounces anyway).

See? It’s that easy. And in most cases there’s a link to the ISP’s postmaster page which will provide further information on what to do or context around why you’re receiving this bounce.

How can you help?
There is no uniform standard amongst ISPs mandating that certain bounces be stated a certain way. As such, you see a huge variety of bounce messages and what information an ISP will provide. Also, as ISPs deem necessary, bounce codes change over time making existing ones outdated and adding new ones. Please help the email community stay on top of the changes by contributing to the GetSatisfaction bounce project site when you see new bounce codes that aren’t listed or know one that’s already listed has changed. By making this an industry effort, we can ensure all of us are up with the latest news. Feel free to ask questions on the site as well. We have a few deliverability folks monitoring it.

Who put this together?
The following folks were involved with this project and we extend our gratitude!

Joshua Baer - Founder & CEO - OtherInbox/Chief Evangelist - Datran Media
Dennis Dayman, VP, Privacy, Eloqua
Michelle Eichner, VP, Pivotal Veracity and Co-Chair, Deliverability Roundtable
Stephanie Miller - VP, Global Market Development - Return Path
Jack Sinclair - Co-Founder, COO & CFO - Return Path and Co-Chair, Deliverability Roundtable
Chris Wheeler - Director of Deliverability - Bronto Software
and other members of the eec Deliverability Roundtable

- Chris Wheeler, Director, Deliverability, Bronto Software and Member, eec Deliverability Roundtable

Suggestion: 9 Real World Common Email Marketing Mistakes to Avoid

Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:14:25 PDT

Not every email marketing best practice is an obvious one. In fact, in our experience at ClickMail Marketing, there are quite a few best practices that companies seem to look over or deliberately ignore. The result? The opposite of best practices, or what we kindly call “common email marketing mistakes” rather than worst practices.

In an industry where a half a percentage point can make or break a campaign, it’s our opinion that tweaking and optimizing every possible factor is worth the effort. With that in mind, I asked our staff to compile a list of the top 10 mistakes they see when deploying email campaigns on behalf of clients. The good news is that they only came up with nine. And the even better news is that these are all easy best practices to adapt and adhere to.

Below are the common mistakes seen by the staff at ClickMail, and what you can do to avoid them:

Common email marketing mistake #1: Sloppy Copy

Check your spelling. Copy and paste into Word and run spell-check if you need to. Also check the spelling in your links. If your URL is wrong, so are you.
Read the copy. Don’t scam, skim or skip over. Reading is the only way to ensure proper use of language like “their” vs. “there” vs. “they’re”, missing words, incorrect punctuation or poor sentence structure. Best practice: Print it out to read on paper. Even better best practice: Read it out loud.
Employ a second set of eyes for final review. Once you’ve written, read and edited the same piece of content many times, it is no longer fresh to you and errors are easily overlooked. Ask someone else to run spell check and read the copy. You may be surprised to see what you missed.

Common email marketing mistake #2: Crummy Coding

Set the pixel width to 600. This prevents the need to scroll to the right—and the potential to lose interest if someone feels they have to do too much work to read your email.
Don’t use CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) in your HTML coding. It is stripped out by many ESPs, meaning your message can be lost. Even if you’ve spell checked it and done all the best practices described above!
Many ESPs also suppress images by default, as do email clients (about 80%). Do not create your email message out of one big image or your subscribers may only see a blank page with a little, tiny red X. If you use any images, to be on the safe side, utilize a View Online feature so they have another way to see images if they are suppressed.

Common email marketing mistake #3: Cold Calls to Action

Your call to action (CTA) should be in text format, not an image because—as mentioned above—images are suppressed by default by many email service providers and email clients.
Include two to three instances of your CTA above the fold (in the first 300 pixels). Make sure to include at least one graphical and one textual CTA.
The top one-third and the left-most area of your emails are the most valuable real estate. Try to place a CTA those areas, in text and as minimal images.

Common email marketing mistake #4: Poor Subject Lines

Your subject line should be seven words or less (or 35 characters). Most people know this but might not know that the following conditions in a subject line can be flagged as SPAM:

Percent of Capital Letters: Too many uppercase letters compared to lowercase letters
Repeating Capital Letter: Too many upper case letters in a row (e.g., SALE)
Gaps: When the words have gaps between letters like s*t*y*l*e
Repetition: When letters or characters are repeated (*****)
Special Character Flag: Overuse of special characters (e.g., & $ # @ ( )[ ] !)
Punctuation Flag: Too much punctuation (…) or the type of punctuation (!)
Word/Space Ratio: Spammers use blank spaces to catch the recipient’s attention resulting in a high ratio of spaces to words
First Character Flag/First Word Flag: Subject lines starting with a special character or punctuation. Words like “Free”, “hey”, “Sale” etc.

Common email marketing mistake #5: Obscure “From” Label

Your From address is key information used by subscribers to determine if your email is spam or not. If it’s not relevant or recognizable, they may mark it as spam, or just delete it without opening it.

Common email marketing mistake #6: Floating From Address and/or Domain

Keep a static “From” address and/or domain, and ask to be added to the recipient’s Safe Sender list at the top of each email.

Common email marketing mistake #7: Lazy Lists

Utilize the Forward to a Friend (FTF) feature to organically grow your list.
Practice good and consistent list hygiene. Most people know to honor opt outs in 10 days to be CAN-SPAM compliant but you should also clean your list(s) of hard bounces after each send, plus monitor soft bounces and remove from your list as needed.

Common email marketing mistake #8: Competing Links

Don’t include competing links, period. Unless it’s a newsletter, most emails should be single subject with a single call to action. If it’s a sale, link to the appropriate sale items. If it’s an invitation, link to the registration page etc.

Common email marketing mistake #9: Unfair Unsubscribe

The unsubscribe link must be the first step, per CAN-SPAM. Don’t make people jump through hoops to opt out.

Now, I hope you read the nine common email marketing mistakes above and nodded your head in agreement, confident you’re innocent of all. If not, if even one of those nine listed tripped you up, go fix it now and increase your ROI later as a result.

- Marco Marini, President & CEO, ClickMail Marketing

Marco Marini is an acknowledged expert in e-marketing with over a decade and half's-worth of experience in the field. Before taking over as CEO, he was CMM's VP of Marketing & Operations. Marini has also held key marketing positions with CyberSource, eHealthInsurance, DoveBid and IBM Canada.

Gmail: Unsubscribes, Complaints and Engagement

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:59:20 PDT

Gmail reported in their blog this week that they have developed a way to provide their users with an opportunity to report spam and/or unsubscribe from emails they receive in their Gmail accounts. The article, titled “Unsubscribing Made Easy” is a positive change for Gmail, but still falls short of where most legitimate senders want to see.

Like many complaint feedback loops (also known as FBL’s) offered by a number of ISPs, Gmail’s new functionality is mostly a good thing. I applaud their effort, and it certainly helps when there is this cooperation and transparency in the sender/receiver relationship. It is better for everyone. This is why the Abuse Reporting Format was met with applause by senders when it arrived a few years back.

Here are the good parts. First, Gmail’s new feature provides the subscriber with a chance to mark a message as spam, which should allow Gmail to better filter their email. Second, in addition to the option to just report spam, the end user may also choose to “unsubscribe and report spam.” This second option apparently is just provided when Gmail deems the sender to be reputable. See the image below for an idea on what the subscriber sees.

In his blog, Brad Taylor outlines the reasons Gmail pursued the development of this new feature.

“For those of you senders who are interested in this feature, the most basic requirements are including a standard "List-Unsubscribe" header in your email with a "mailto" URL and, of course, honoring requests from users wishing to unsubscribe. You'll also need to follow good sending practices, which in a nutshell means not sending unwanted email (see our bulk sending guidelines for more information).

With an easy way to unsubscribe, everybody wins. Your spam folder is smaller, and senders don't waste time sending you email that you no longer want.

Update (1:50pm): If you want to unsubscribe without reporting the message as spam, click "show details" in the top-right corner of the message, then click "Unsubscribe from this sender."

It is this piece that leads me to a bit of concern on the implementation. If Gmail is doing their usual checks on authentication, reputation, content etc. to determine which senders are legitimate, why then force the end-user to either mark something as spam, or go through “show details” (which nearly no one will do) to unsubscribe? Why not also provide an unsubscribe button on the interface in addition to the “report spam” button?
I can understand why Gmail would forgo providing the email address back to the sender at the user’s discretion. However, even the FTC has a study showing that unsubscribing from spam doesn’t really lead to more spam. In the FTC’s 2002 study, they report that “In no instance did we find that any of our unique email accounts received more spam after attempting to unsubscribe.”

Gmail has the opportunity to educate their subscribers on legitimate and unsolicited email. Why not provide just an “unsubscribe” button for legitimate senders, and explain why they are doing it, rather than propagating the unfounded fear of unsubscribing?
Also, other ISPs have gotten around this privacy concern by not passing back the actual email address back to the sender. Many senders use other forensics to determine which subscriber complained so that this subscriber can be removed from the list.

Engagement Matters
We advise clients to look at all sorts of engagement metrics, and unsubscribes and complaints are equally as important as opens and clicks. When possible, I’d like to know the ultimate intent of the subscriber when they choose to get off of a list. I always say I’d rather have someone unsubscribe from my email than ignore me.

As for which email this is enabled for and which not, the folks over at Word to the Wise looked at this a bit deeper and do some testing. They found that:
“Conditions where the unsubscribe option is presented include:

The mail is authenticated
The sender has a good reputation
The email has a mailto: option in the List-Unsubscribe header
The recipients marks the message as spam”

Either way, legitimate senders do benefit from this, but it is fun to dream of having both unsubscribe and report spam options available to subscribers.

- Chip House, Vice President, Industry & Relationship Marketing, ExactTarget

Chip is responsible for industry research and relations, and owns the targeted marketing programs that ensure the satisfaction and success of ExactTarget's client base. Chip also manages the teams responsible for marketing research, deliverability compliance, and privacy initiatives. As an established industry leader, Chip writes regularly for online marketing publications and was named to BtoB Magazine's 2005 “Who's Who in B-To-B” for being a vocal proponent of legitimate commercial email. Chip brings 20 years of direct marketing and twelve years of internet marketing experience to ExactTarget.

Study: 20% of Marketing Email Never Reaches the Inbox

Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:02:50 PDT

Sometimes email is too inexpensive for our own good. It sure is tempting and certainly is very easy to send too frequently or assume permission or “just mail that generic sale notice/product announcement to everyone.”

Now, I get a lot of postal mail that is not that interesting to me. And surely most of the tweets I see are not that relevant. Even search results can be off target. Yet, there is a penalty for not respecting and delighting our email subscribers that does not exist in other direct channels: It’s called the "report spam" button. Even a small number of those spam complaints will get all your messages blocked by the ISPs like Yahoo!, Gmail and Hotmail, as well as corporate systems.

It happens to the best of us. Turns out that, despite all we’ve learned about email marketing best practices and the rules of engagement for getting past the spam filters, the average inbox deliverability is still only about 80% according to a new Return Path study.

Leaving 20% of your marketing messages on the spam pile is like leaving 20% of your revenue behind. Don’t stand for it. Complacency or thinking that “it’s the other guy” is just not valid. This study looks at commercial senders like you and me – branded companies with permission grants and a desire to do the right thing. And we still lose an average of 20%!

The good news is that averages can be beat. Respect your subscribers, curb your frequency, target and customize, keep your list clean, authenticate, process bounces correctly and maintain a solid infrastructure. You will lower complaints and improve your inbox reach. When you reach the inbox, you can earn a response and revenue.

- Stephanie Miller, VP, Market Development, Return Path, Inc.