<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>
				employeescreenIQ -- Legislative Updates
			</title>
			<link>
				http://university.employeescreen.com/rss/legislation/20
			</link>
			<description>
				Smart employee screening, articles, press releases and white papers
			</description>
			<language>
				en-us
			</language>
			<pubDate>
				Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:20:53 -0400
			</pubDate>
			<lastBuildDate>
				Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:20:53 -0400
			</lastBuildDate>
			<generator>
				Nixon 2.1
			</generator>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
				<title>
					Breaking News: DHS Strengthens Administration's Commitment to E-Verify (7/8/2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/YIqYUF9We3s/DHS_Commits_E-Verify_Federal_Contractors</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/DHS_Commits_E-Verify_Federal_Contractors
				</guid>
				<description>
					It appears that the government is finally ready to follow through on its mandate to have all federal contractors use E-Verify to confirm employment eligibility on all workers.  After several delays since the rule was supposed to take effect in January, 2009, DHS sent out this release this morning.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:26:27 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/DHS_Commits_E-Verify_Federal_Contractors
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					All State of Missouri Sex Offenders Must Register (July 6, 2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/FwYsDvFuBCo/Missouri_Sex_Offenders_Background_Checks</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Missouri_Sex_Offenders_Background_Checks
				</guid>
				<description>
					This ruling will allow employers that conduct Sex Offender Searches as part of their background check procedures to have a more comprehensive look at the state’s database.  
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:50:33 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Missouri_Sex_Offenders_Background_Checks
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					Another Delay for E-Verify Enforcement (6/2/2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/V4sHIvbB_aA/DHS_Delays_E-Verify_Again</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/DHS_Delays_E-Verify_Again
				</guid>
				<description>
					DHS has again delayed enforcement  of the requirement that mandates federal contractors use the E-Verify system to check the eligibility of their employees to work in the U.S. until at least September 8, 2009.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:38:19 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/DHS_Delays_E-Verify_Again
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					Utah Selections Procedures Act (5/12/09)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/62Ca6BLs7hM/Utah_HB206_Background_Checks</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Utah_HB206_Background_Checks
				</guid>
				<description>
					Employers subject to this law may also not use information about an applicant for any other purpose than to determine whether the employer will hire the applicant as an employee.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Thu, 21 May 2009 12:43:32 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Utah_HB206_Background_Checks
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					FTC Delays Enforcement of “Red Flags” Rules Again (5/1/2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/nyUU9tW7d_k/FTC_Delays_Red_Flags</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/FTC_Delays_Red_Flags
				</guid>
				<description>
					The FTC has announced that are delaying enforcement of the “Red Flags” Guidelines for Identity Theft Prevention until August 1, 2009 for all Creditors and Financial Institutions.  
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Fri, 01 May 2009 10:02:10 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/FTC_Delays_Red_Flags
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					Revised I-9 Employment Verification Form (4/13/2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/KEirsI4n-NE/Revised_I9_Form_E-Verify</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Revised_I9_Form_E-Verify
				</guid>
				<description>
					Effective April 3, 2009 all U.S. employers must use the new I-9 Form which was revised earlier this year. 
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:04:16 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Revised_I9_Form_E-Verify
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					Hawaii House Bill 31 Threatens Use of Credit Checks (2/27/2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/IuBxZvd92uQ/Hawaii_HB31_Credit_Reports</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Hawaii_HB31_Credit_Reports
				</guid>
				<description>
					Legislators in the state of Hawaii have drafted a bill that would prohibit employers from using credit reports when conducting employment background checks.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:03:41 -0500
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Hawaii_HB31_Credit_Reports
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					Connecticut House Bill 5521 Threatens Use of Credit Checks (2/19/2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/giOc3QJV0FA/Connecticut_5521_Credit_Reports</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Connecticut_5521_Credit_Reports
				</guid>
				<description>
					The stated purpose of Connecticut House Bill 5521 is “to prevent discrimination against prospective employees on the basis of their credit history.” 
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:27:35 -0500
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Connecticut_5521_Credit_Reports
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					New Mexico House Bill 103 Threatens Employment Background Checks (2/9/2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/41jh9yRdwOg/New_Mexico_H103_Background_Checks</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/New_Mexico_H103_Background_Checks
				</guid>
				<description>
					Legislators in the state of New Mexico have introduced a bill that would remove personal identifiers such as Social Security Numbers and Dates of Birth from public records.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:39:06 -0500
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/New_Mexico_H103_Background_Checks
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					DHS Postpones E-Verify Requirement . . . Again (1/29/2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/v-CBNarrDBk/E-Verify_Requirement_Delayed</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/E-Verify_Requirement_Delayed
				</guid>
				<description>
					The parties have agreed to extend the applicability date to May 21, 2009, and asked the court to stay the proceedings to allow President Barrack Obama’s Administration an opportunity to review the rule.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:39:43 -0500
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/E-Verify_Requirement_Delayed
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					DHS Postpones E-Verify Requirement (1/12/2009)
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/Fpzp9VmdCek/E-Verify_Requirement_Postponed</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/E-Verify_Requirement_Postponed
				</guid>
				<description>
					. . . the federal government has postponed a requirement that mandates federal government contractors to use the E-Verify system . . .
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:19:43 -0500
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/E-Verify_Requirement_Postponed
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					1/6/2009 Alert for New York Employers Conducting Background Checks:  Article 23-A
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/Jp7UUkusjdk/New_York_Background_Checks_Article23A</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/New_York_Background_Checks_Article23A
				</guid>
				<description>
					As of February 1, 2009 you must comply with the New York State Correction Law Article 23-A, Section 753 “Licensure and Employment of Persons Previously Convicted of One or More Criminal Offenses”.

				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:52:45 -0500
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/New_York_Background_Checks_Article23A
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					12/28/2008 USCIS Revises Employment Eligibility Verification Form Requirements
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/v51UjtNvI9Y/I9_Form_USCIS_Revisions</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/I9_Form_USCIS_Revisions
				</guid>
				<description>
					By now many of you are aware of the mandate that all federal contractors must utilize an electronic employment eligibility process to determine an employee’s right to work status.  However, did you know that the government has revised the list of acceptable identity documents? 
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:52:55 -0500
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/I9_Form_USCIS_Revisions
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					11/20/2008 Federal Contractor E-Verify Rule Is Final! By Teresa A. Cheek of Young Conaway
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/VBkqb548frY/E-Verify_Federal_Contractors</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/E-Verify_Federal_Contractors
				</guid>
				<description>
					Labor and employment attorney Teresa Cheeck from Young Conaway provides some insight into the new government regulations.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:27:29 -0500
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/E-Verify_Federal_Contractors
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					10/23/2008 FTC Delays Enforcement of “Red Flags” Rules: Employers Still Must Comply
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/8SFFqW3TR-4/FTC_Red_Flags_Background_Checks</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/FTC_Red_Flags_Background_Checks
				</guid>
				<description>
					This delay does not apply to employers who still need to be in compliance by the original November 1, 2008 deadline.  
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:07:57 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/FTC_Red_Flags_Background_Checks
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					10/10/2008 Short-Term Extension Of E-Verify Sets Up Big 2009 Battle
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/WxWCsgzijwI/E-Verify_Big_Battle_Immigration</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/E-Verify_Big_Battle_Immigration
				</guid>
				<description>
					A bruising partisan battle over an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws is expected to surface in the early days of the next Congress and new presidential administration, a clash that already has lawmakers, lobbyists and immigration advocates gearing up to fight.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:45:59 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/E-Verify_Big_Battle_Immigration
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					10/1/2008 Update: California Bill to Limit Credit Reports Vetoed
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/VHibuy5p63E/California_Credit_Reports_AB2918</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/California_Credit_Reports_AB2918
				</guid>
				<description>
					Schwarzennger said California AB2918 "would significantly increase businesses’ exposure to civil actions over the use of credit checks.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:37:29 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/California_Credit_Reports_AB2918
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					9/11/2008 New York Amendment to State Correction Law Has New Provisions for Employers 
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/yeW3C25Hy4s/New_York_Criminal_Record_Amendment</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/New_York_Criminal_Record_Amendment
				</guid>
				<description>
					New York law requires employers to post Article 23A- Section 753 is a visually conspicuous area.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:23:35 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/New_York_Criminal_Record_Amendment
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					8/26/2008 California Employers Beware: Right to Review Credit Reports Threatened
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/VwrEwJD5CiU/California_Credit_Reports</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/California_Credit_Reports
				</guid>
				<description>
					California Assembly Bill 2918 seeks to severely restrict employers' ability to review employment credit reports.
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:40:22 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/California_Credit_Reports
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
			<item>
				<title>
					7/25/2008 Mass. Proposes Redaction of  Identifiers: Bad News for Employment Screening
				</title>
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Employeescreeniq--LegislativeUpdates/~3/Pi7N-nwDrOY/Massachusetts_Redaction_Bad_News_Employment_Screening</link>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Massachusetts_Redaction_Bad_News_Employment_Screening
				</guid>
				<description>
					The state of Massachusetts is proposing some pretty significant regulations in order to protect privacy and limit the opportunity for identity theft. These measures include the following guidelines for court records:
				</description>
				<pubDate>
					Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:54:35 -0400
				</pubDate>
			<feedburner:origLink>
					http://university.employeescreen.com/legislation/Massachusetts_Redaction_Bad_News_Employment_Screening
				</feedburner:origLink></item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
