<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Federal Law Articles » Employment Law Information Network</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.elinfonet.com/category/federal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.elinfonet.com</link>
	<description>All Things Labor and Employment Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Beltway Buzz, April 24, 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/beltway-buzz-april-24-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Gov't - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Beltway Buzz® is a weekly update summarizing labor and employment news from inside the Beltway and clarifying how what’s happening in Washington, D.C., could impact your business.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/beltway-buzz-april-24-2026/">Beltway Buzz, April 24, 2026</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninth Circuit Says Non-Mutual Issue Preclusion Tactic Can’t Be Used to Avoid Arbitration</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/ninth-circuit-says-non-mutual-issue-preclusion-tactic-cant-be-used-to-avoid-arbitration/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - Arbitration Issues]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that non-mutual offensive collateral estoppel—a doctrine under which a party different from the party in the original action seeks to preclude the opposing party from relitigating an issue decided against it—cannot be used to invalidate hundreds of arbitration agreements under the Federal</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/ninth-circuit-says-non-mutual-issue-preclusion-tactic-cant-be-used-to-avoid-arbitration/">Ninth Circuit Says Non-Mutual Issue Preclusion Tactic Can’t Be Used to Avoid Arbitration</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy Week in Review – April 24, 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/policy-week-in-review-april-24-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 19:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Gov't - DOL]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Policy Week in Review – April 24, 2026 DOL Announces Proposed Rule on Joint Employment  tgelbman@littler.com Fri, 04/24/2026 &#8211; 14:06</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/policy-week-in-review-april-24-2026/">Policy Week in Review – April 24, 2026</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Would the European Commission’s Draft Proposal for the EU Inc. Affect German Employers?</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/how-would-the-european-commissions-draft-proposal-for-the-eu-inc-affect-german-employers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Multinational Employers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How Would the European Commission’s Draft Proposal for the EU Inc. Affect German Employers? On March 18, 2026, the European Commission published its proposal for an EU-wide legal framework establishing a new form of limited-liability company – the EU Inc. With this draft, the Commission aims to promote start-ups and</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/how-would-the-european-commissions-draft-proposal-for-the-eu-inc-affect-german-employers/">How Would the European Commission’s Draft Proposal for the EU Inc. Affect German Employers?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the Investigation Becomes the Case</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/when-the-investigation-becomes-the-case/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaw Law Group, PC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 16:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - Workplace Investigations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When something goes wrong in the workplace, such as employees submitting harassment, discrimination, or retaliation claims, most employers know they need to investigate. But the real issue is not whether an investigation happens. The key is</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/when-the-investigation-becomes-the-case/">When the Investigation Becomes the Case</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ Orders Immediate Reclassification of Medical Marijuana Products</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/doj-orders-immediate-reclassification-of-medical-marijuana-products/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 01:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - Drugs & Alcohol]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has reclassified certain marijuana and marijuana-containing products to Schedule III controlled substances, which recognizes a drug’s potential legitimate medical use, a significant change in federal drug policy that could have implications for employers and workplace drug policies.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/doj-orders-immediate-reclassification-of-medical-marijuana-products/">DOJ Orders Immediate Reclassification of Medical Marijuana Products</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ Moves Certain Marijuana Products to Schedule III, Sets June Rescheduling Hearing</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/doj-moves-certain-marijuana-products-to-schedule-iii-sets-june-rescheduling-hearing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - Drugs & Alcohol]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Justice issued an Order on April 22, 2026 immediately placing all FDA-approved marijuana products and marijuana products regulated by a state medical marijuana license in Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). A second order also signed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche sets a June 29, 2026 hearing to&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/doj-moves-certain-marijuana-products-to-schedule-iii-sets-june-rescheduling-hearing/">DOJ Moves Certain Marijuana Products to Schedule III, Sets June Rescheduling Hearing</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acting Attorney General Issues New DEA Order Reclassifying Some Marijuana Products as Schedule III Controlled Substances, Available by Prescription</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/acting-attorney-general-issues-new-dea-order-reclassifying-some-marijuana-products-as-schedule-iii-controlled-substances-available-by-prescription/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - Drugs & Alcohol]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Acting Attorney General Issues New DEA Order Reclassifying Some Marijuana Products as Schedule III Controlled Substances, Available by Prescription With the stroke of a pen, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a new “final order” on April 23, 2026, that reclassifies FDA-approved medications that contain marijuana and marijuana products authorized</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/acting-attorney-general-issues-new-dea-order-reclassifying-some-marijuana-products-as-schedule-iii-controlled-substances-available-by-prescription/">Acting Attorney General Issues New DEA Order Reclassifying Some Marijuana Products as Schedule III Controlled Substances, Available by Prescription</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Web Accessibility Deadline Extended</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/government-web-accessibility-deadline-extended/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ADA - Public Accommodations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The DOJ recently extended the deadline for states and local governments to comply with its web accessibility rule under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Read more about these requirements, the deadlines, and similar requirements for recipients of federal funding from the Department of Health and Human Services. DOJ Extends Public Entities’ Compliance&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/government-web-accessibility-deadline-extended/">Government Web Accessibility Deadline Extended</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Challenge Mounted to New Anti-DEI Executive Order Targeting Federal Contractors</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/legal-challenge-mounted-to-new-anti-dei-executive-order-targeting-federal-contractors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 20, 2026, a coalition of higher education/academic and minority trade associations filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland challenging President Donald Trump’s recent executive order that attaches direct contractual consequences to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The lawsuit alleges the executive order</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/legal-challenge-mounted-to-new-anti-dei-executive-order-targeting-federal-contractors/">Legal Challenge Mounted to New Anti-DEI Executive Order Targeting Federal Contractors</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Circuit Ruling on MSHA Jurisdiction Leaves Key Questions Unanswered</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/d-c-circuit-ruling-on-msha-jurisdiction-leaves-key-questions-unanswered/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[OSHA - Mining]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 17, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued its second decision in Secretary of Labor v. KC Transport, Inc., a long-running case concerning the Mine Safety and Health Administration’s (MSHA) jurisdictional limits—but its extremely narrow view of the facts provides little guidance beyond the</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/d-c-circuit-ruling-on-msha-jurisdiction-leaves-key-questions-unanswered/">D.C. Circuit Ruling on MSHA Jurisdiction Leaves Key Questions Unanswered</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAR Council Accelerates Implementation of Executive Order 14398 With Instructions to Agencies</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/far-council-accelerates-implementation-of-executive-order-14398-with-instructions-to-agencies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 19:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Federal contractors have new insight into how the government may implement and enforce Executive Order (EO) 14398, which aims to prevent federal contractors and subcontractors from engaging in discriminatory diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) activities related to race and ethnicity. Recent Federal Acquisition Regulatory (FAR) Council guidance and its request for emergency approval for a&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/far-council-accelerates-implementation-of-executive-order-14398-with-instructions-to-agencies/">FAR Council Accelerates Implementation of Executive Order 14398 With Instructions to Agencies</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment Trends Impacting the Financial Services Industry with Matthew Penfield of Maynard Nexsen</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/employment-trends-impacting-the-financial-services-industry-with-matthew-penfield-of-maynard-nexsen/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maynard Nexsen PC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Employment Trends Impacting the Financial Services Industry with Matthew Penfield of Maynard Nexsen</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/employment-trends-impacting-the-financial-services-industry-with-matthew-penfield-of-maynard-nexsen/">Employment Trends Impacting the Financial Services Industry with Matthew Penfield of Maynard Nexsen</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tale of Two Standards: Supreme Court Lets Conflicting Rules on Third-Party Harassment Stand</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/a-tale-of-two-standards-supreme-court-lets-conflicting-rules-on-third-party-harassment-stand/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Harassment By Non-Employees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court of the United States recently denied certiorari in Bivens v. Zep, Inc., leaving in place a stark circuit split on the standard for employer liability when customers or other third parties harass employees.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/a-tale-of-two-standards-supreme-court-lets-conflicting-rules-on-third-party-harassment-stand/">A Tale of Two Standards: Supreme Court Lets Conflicting Rules on Third-Party Harassment Stand</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review in Bivens v. Zep: What the Ongoing Split Means for Employers</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/u-s-supreme-court-declines-review-in-bivens-v-zep-what-the-ongoing-split-means-for-employers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ford Harrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Title VII - Employer Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bivens v Zep]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Bivens v. Zep, leaving intact that court’s holding that an employer’s liability under Title VII for harassment of employees by third parties depends on the employer’s intent. The Court’s decision also leaves in place a growing divide among the federal courts of appeals [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/u-s-supreme-court-declines-review-in-bivens-v-zep-what-the-ongoing-split-means-for-employers/">U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review in Bivens v. Zep: What the Ongoing Split Means for Employers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
