<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Federal Employment Law Articles</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/</link>
<description>Employment Law Articles covering topics from age discrimination to WARN.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:11:47 EST</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-us</language>


<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/EmploymentLawArticles" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
<title>Better Safe than Sorry: 5 Commonsense Considerations for Employers in the Face of the H1N1 Outbreak.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/0Y9j7LVXNOE/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8658</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Panic or pandemic? Right now,
nobody can say for certain what
course the H1N1 virus will take
in the upcoming months. It may
end up like the Bird Flu scare,
having little discernible impact.
Or, our worst fears may be
realized with a widespread
pandemic and disruption to our
daily lives. One thing is certain,
we are already feeling the
effects with mass school
closings, long lines for flu shots,
and chaos in many
pediatricians’ offices.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pXsfWtPyGIWfLxPPg-5zPxElB5w/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pXsfWtPyGIWfLxPPg-5zPxElB5w/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pXsfWtPyGIWfLxPPg-5zPxElB5w/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pXsfWtPyGIWfLxPPg-5zPxElB5w/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/0Y9j7LVXNOE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8658</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Comment Period Open for Proposed Regs to the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/WnfCHJTiRGk/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8657</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>The U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission
(“EEOC”) and the U.S.
Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
will be hosting a town hall
meeting in Chicago to invite
comments on the proposed
regulations to the ADA
Amendments Act of 2008 found
at www.eeoc.gov. The
agencies are encouraging input
on the regulations from the
perspectives of both the
business and disability
advocacy communities.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ofWo3tCwcYfM-fg4wn4wPxJS3Jw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ofWo3tCwcYfM-fg4wn4wPxJS3Jw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ofWo3tCwcYfM-fg4wn4wPxJS3Jw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ofWo3tCwcYfM-fg4wn4wPxJS3Jw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/WnfCHJTiRGk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8657</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Congress Expands FMLA - Again.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/3BAdQuoGz-I/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8656</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>For the second time in the last
two years, Congress has
expanded the scope of the
Family and Medical Leave Act
(“FMLA”). On October 28,
2009, President Obama signed
into law the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010 (the “Act”).
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DrgC5gnnglr-mnpM0BTsx78X83Q/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DrgC5gnnglr-mnpM0BTsx78X83Q/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DrgC5gnnglr-mnpM0BTsx78X83Q/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DrgC5gnnglr-mnpM0BTsx78X83Q/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/3BAdQuoGz-I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8656</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Defamation Lawsuits Remain a Concern for Employers.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/bwijfSRyY2A/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8655</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Although many employers today
are warily watching the
legislative horizon for laws
creating new protected classes
(sexual orientation,
whistleblowers) and expanding
limitations periods (Ledbetter),
they would do well to remember
that increasing numbers of
employees are turning to
defamation claims to redress
damage allegedly done to their
reputation by discipline and
discharge decisions. Because
these claims are often fi led in
state court, where the judges
are often more hesitant to grant
summary judgment, the juries
typically more generous, and
the damages uncapped, there is
signifi cant risk for employers.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lDnCBCoahxcPonwHq6XyuwLE5Wg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lDnCBCoahxcPonwHq6XyuwLE5Wg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lDnCBCoahxcPonwHq6XyuwLE5Wg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lDnCBCoahxcPonwHq6XyuwLE5Wg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/bwijfSRyY2A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8655</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Expanded Whistleblower Protections under the Amended FCA.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/nTD_jN0fMhE/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8654</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>With examples of corporate
malfeasance dominating the
news, blowing the whistle is
more popular than ever.
Retaliatory discharge lawsuits
brought by whistleblowers,
however, are nothing new.
Such claims have an
understandable jury appeal;
nobody seems surprised that a
company, or a rogue manager,
strikes back after accusations of
wrongdoing. Sound policies and
conscientious compliance
departments can go a long way
towards minimizing liability for
whistleblower claims.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CKrLLG3rR4u-pGgwoDFCtJmjceQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CKrLLG3rR4u-pGgwoDFCtJmjceQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CKrLLG3rR4u-pGgwoDFCtJmjceQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CKrLLG3rR4u-pGgwoDFCtJmjceQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/nTD_jN0fMhE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8654</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Opening Pandora's Box: Employers and Social Networking Sites.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/xKsLvAxmXOg/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8653</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>As the law struggles to keep
pace with the frenetic world of
online networking, employers
must be mindful of the risks
they face by allowing
employees to access social
networking sites such as
Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn.
Using these social networking
sites to “check up” on an
employee, identify or assess
potential employees, or simply
“friend” or link up with a
subordinate entails risks.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dih9k5qpwayG-1dT0WRkADbcniM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dih9k5qpwayG-1dT0WRkADbcniM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dih9k5qpwayG-1dT0WRkADbcniM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dih9k5qpwayG-1dT0WRkADbcniM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/xKsLvAxmXOg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8653</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Supreme Court to Hear Five Labor and Employment Cases.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/11WrgRTAxys/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8652</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>The United States Supreme
Court began its latest term on
October 5, with fi ve cases on
its docket that will directly
impact employers. Two of the
cases deal with labor
arbitration; a third deals with
the degree of deference due an
ERISA plan administrator; a
fourth addresses the amount of
time a plaintiff has to fi le a
discrimination charge; and the
fi nal one involves allegations of
whistle-blowing and the
attorney-client privilege.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lKbsib_7aK72GJ-PxT4Gkfsz1H0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lKbsib_7aK72GJ-PxT4Gkfsz1H0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lKbsib_7aK72GJ-PxT4Gkfsz1H0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/lKbsib_7aK72GJ-PxT4Gkfsz1H0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/11WrgRTAxys" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8652</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>The Independent Contractor Conundrum.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/2ldx8dIZWWE/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8651</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>As the recession lingers on,
employers continue to search for
ways to manage operating costs.
One common (but increasingly
risky) cost-cutting measure is the
use of independent contractors in
positions that are normally fi lled
by employees.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EZ4IEs0img9AP92jKVYFRlBn6dU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EZ4IEs0img9AP92jKVYFRlBn6dU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EZ4IEs0img9AP92jKVYFRlBn6dU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EZ4IEs0img9AP92jKVYFRlBn6dU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/2ldx8dIZWWE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8651</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Update on the Employee Free Choice Act.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/tTfAHZO_cWY/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8650</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Although the contentious health
care debate remains front and
center—both in Congress and
in the media—signifi cant labor
law changes appear close at
hand as well. Do not let the
lack of headlines fool you—the
Employee Free Choice Act
(“EFCA”) remains a priority for
the Obama administration and
the Democratic-controlled
Congress. Informed observers
expect that EFCA will be the
next hot-button issue taken up
by Congress.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/L3Hg-VKB62qbljw-4upbioDeMfI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/L3Hg-VKB62qbljw-4upbioDeMfI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/L3Hg-VKB62qbljw-4upbioDeMfI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/L3Hg-VKB62qbljw-4upbioDeMfI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/tTfAHZO_cWY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8650</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>MORE CHANGES TO THE FMLA AND OTHER LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS.</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/G2Yd19kjnx0/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8649</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Just when employers were starting to get familiar with all of the recent changes to the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA), last week President Obama signed into law yet another expansion of the FMLA military leave provisions. These changes are found in the Fiscal Year 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2647). The new law, which is effective immediately, expands the so-called "qualifying exigency" and "military caregiver" leave provisions under the FMLA.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IHqmvNe9opri8OTKlQAlSeTE3xM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IHqmvNe9opri8OTKlQAlSeTE3xM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IHqmvNe9opri8OTKlQAlSeTE3xM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IHqmvNe9opri8OTKlQAlSeTE3xM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~4/G2Yd19kjnx0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8649</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>

</rss>
