<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Federal Law Articles » Employment Law Information Network</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.elinfonet.com/category/federal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.elinfonet.com</link>
	<description>All Things Labor and Employment Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 12:28:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Vacation Approved but Spent on Strike—German Labor Court Denies Pay and Leave</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/vacation-approved-but-spent-on-strike-german-labor-court-denies-pay-and-leave/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Multinational Employers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=170194</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In its ruling of January 29, 2026 (Ref. No. 4 SLa 290/24), Germany’s Saxony Regional Labor Court (Landesarbeitsgericht (LAG)) held that a lawful strike supersedes previously approved vacation leave, meaning that participating employees may receive no pay for that period and may forfeit the corresponding vacation days—a decision with particular</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/vacation-approved-but-spent-on-strike-german-labor-court-denies-pay-and-leave/">Vacation Approved but Spent on Strike—German Labor Court Denies Pay and Leave</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigating the EU Pay Transparency Directive: The Latest Developments</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/navigating-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-the-latest-developments/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Multinational Employers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=170195</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As the transposition deadline of 7 June 2026 looms closer, EU member states remain at vastly different stages of implementing the EU Pay Transparency Directive.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/navigating-the-eu-pay-transparency-directive-the-latest-developments/">Navigating the EU Pay Transparency Directive: The Latest Developments</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Cause Dismissal and Litigation Lessons From a British Columbia Court of Appeal Opinion</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/just-cause-dismissal-and-litigation-lessons-from-a-british-columbia-court-of-appeal-opinion/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Multinational Employers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=170196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 13, 2026, the British Columbia Court of Appeal released Chao v. Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd., unanimously dismissing an employee’s appeal and affirming that his employer had just cause to terminate an employee, without compensation, for violating a workplace COVID-19 safety policy.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/just-cause-dismissal-and-litigation-lessons-from-a-british-columbia-court-of-appeal-opinion/">Just Cause Dismissal and Litigation Lessons From a British Columbia Court of Appeal Opinion</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Delve Scandal: Why a SOC 2 Report Can’t Be a “Check-the-Box” Exercise for Vendor Management</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/the-delve-scandal-why-a-soc-2-report-cant-be-a-check-the-box-exercise-for-vendor-management/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 11:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - Corporate Accountability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=170119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent Inc. article highlights an unsettling controversy involving Delve, a Y Combinator-backed compliance startup, and allegations that strike at the heart of how organizations rely on SOC (System and Organization Controls) 2 reports which evaluate an organization’s internal controls over security, availability, and privacy. According to the report, a whistleblower investigation alleges that Delve&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/the-delve-scandal-why-a-soc-2-report-cant-be-a-check-the-box-exercise-for-vendor-management/">The Delve Scandal: Why a SOC 2 Report Can’t Be a “Check-the-Box” Exercise for Vendor Management</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Good Intentions Create Liability</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/when-good-intentions-create-liability/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaw Law Group, PC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 15:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=170002</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>You have seen it play out. A strong employee needs flexibility. A manager wants to help. A decision gets made in the moment, practical, human, and well-intended. No one thinks twice about it. Months later,</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/when-good-intentions-create-liability/">When Good Intentions Create Liability</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beltway Buzz, May 1, 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/beltway-buzz-may-1-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Gov't - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Beltway Buzz® is a weekly update summarizing labor and employment news from inside the Beltway and clarifying how what’s happening in Washington, D.C., could impact your business.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/beltway-buzz-may-1-2026/">Beltway Buzz, May 1, 2026</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy Week in Review – May 1, 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/policy-week-in-review-may-1-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Gov't - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Policy Week in Review – May 1, 2026 U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Whether Agencies Can Levy Monetary Fines Without Going to Court  tgelbman@littler.com Fri, 05/01/2026 &#8211; 14:29</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/policy-week-in-review-may-1-2026/">Policy Week in Review – May 1, 2026</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOL Rethinks Joint Employer Standard: Proposal Revisits, Revises 2020 Rule</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/dol-rethinks-joint-employer-standard-proposal-revisits-revises-2020-rule/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FLSA - Employers Covered]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>TakeawaysThe DOL has proposed a new rule that would reshape how joint employer status is analyzed under the FLSA. The standard, if finalized, would also define joint employment under the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act.Although the proposed rule draws from the DOL’s 2020 framework, it moves [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/dol-rethinks-joint-employer-standard-proposal-revisits-revises-2020-rule/">DOL Rethinks Joint Employer Standard: Proposal Revisits, Revises 2020 Rule</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Guidance Section 127 Education Assistance Programs: 2024 vs. 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/irs-guidance-section-127-education-assistance-programs-2024-vs-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefits - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In April 2026, the IRS released updated FAQ (FS-2026-10) that supersedes the prior 2024 FAQ (FS-2024-22) addressing Section 127 educational assistance programs. While the core statutory framework remains largely unchanged, the updated guidance reflects both amendments made by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and additional IRS clarifications that may influence how employers evaluate&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/irs-guidance-section-127-education-assistance-programs-2024-vs-2026/">IRS Guidance Section 127 Education Assistance Programs: 2024 vs. 2026</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the DOL Seek Punitive Damages for FLSA Retaliation? A Kentucky Case May Shape the Answer</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/can-the-dol-seek-punitive-damages-for-flsa-retaliation-a-kentucky-case-may-shape-the-answer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FLSA - Retaliation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Sonderling v. Ikes Artisan Pizza LLC, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is pursuing a legal theory that, if adopted by the court, would allow the DOL to seek punitive damages in Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) retaliation lawsuits.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/can-the-dol-seek-punitive-damages-for-flsa-retaliation-a-kentucky-case-may-shape-the-answer/">Can the DOL Seek Punitive Damages for FLSA Retaliation? A Kentucky Case May Shape the Answer</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of FLSA Violations with Unpaid Interns</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/beware-of-flsa-violations-with-unpaid-interns/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FLSA - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>With summer approaching, many employers are looking to hire interns to increase staffing during a busy season or to build a pipeline for future full-time hiring. But employers need to be careful about making decisions to allow any work to go unpaid.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/beware-of-flsa-violations-with-unpaid-interns/">Beware of FLSA Violations with Unpaid Interns</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Steps to Preparing for the Deposition of an Organization</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/five-steps-to-preparing-for-the-deposition-of-an-organization/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldberg Segalla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyering - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Corporations and other organizations can be deposed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) and state law counterparts. These depositions are unique because the deponent speaks for the corporation, and the testimony binds the entity – not the individual – often with consequences that are difficult to unwind later. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/five-steps-to-preparing-for-the-deposition-of-an-organization/">Five Steps to Preparing for the Deposition of an Organization</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Restraining Orders in the Workplace: A Proactive Approach to Employer Safety (Podcast)</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/restraining-orders-in-the-workplace-a-proactive-approach-to-employer-safety-podcast/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast, Robert Rodriguez (Sacramento) and Tom Bellifemine (Morristown) explore how employers can use restraining orders and injunctive relief as proactive tools to protect their workplaces from violence and disruptive behavior. Tom and Robert, who co-chairs the firm’s Workplace Violence Prevention Practice Group, highlight key differences in the legal</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/restraining-orders-in-the-workplace-a-proactive-approach-to-employer-safety-podcast/">Restraining Orders in the Workplace: A Proactive Approach to Employer Safety (Podcast)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Netherlands: Holiday Accrual During Dormant Employment?</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/the-netherlands-holiday-accrual-during-dormant-employment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Multinational Employers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Netherlands: Holiday Accrual During Dormant Employment? A recent decision of the Rotterdam District Court has clarified that &#8220;dormant employment&#8221; is far from inactive. This ASAP briefly addresses developments that have occurred since our previous post on this issue (click here).  Recap: Dormant employment tgelbman@littler.com Thu, 04/30/2026 &#8211; 13:21</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/the-netherlands-holiday-accrual-during-dormant-employment/">The Netherlands: Holiday Accrual During Dormant Employment?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving Beyond Checkbox Diligence with SOC Reports</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/moving-beyond-checkbox-diligence-with-soc-reports/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[HR - Privacy & Surveillance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=169459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Escalating vendor cyber risk, tighter regulatory expectations and fast-moving AI-driven threats increasingly make checkbox diligence insufficient. In this episode, 360 Advanced’s Director of Compliance Strategy, Eric Ratcliffe, joins co-hosts Damon Silver and Joe Lazzarotti  to discuss system and organizational control framework reports and how businesses can use them to address critical gaps and make vendor [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/moving-beyond-checkbox-diligence-with-soc-reports/">Moving Beyond Checkbox Diligence with SOC Reports</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
