<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Federal Employment Law Articles</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/</link>
<description>Employment Law Articles covering topics from age discrimination to WARN.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:07:30 EST</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-us</language>


<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/EmploymentLawArticles" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Agoraphobic Faculty Member Could Not Support ADA/FMLA Claims.</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/325786979/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7083</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>In an unpublished opinion, the 3d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a lower courts determination that an associate professors termination was appropriate, even though the professor claimed that he was disabled by agoraphobia.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7083</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Youve Gotta Have Heart.</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/325775786/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7082</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Last month President Bush signed into law the Heroes Earnings and Assistance and Relief Act of 2008 (HEART or the Heroes Act). The Act's provisions impact benefits under 401(k) plans. In addition, Health FSAs, group health plans, and cafeteria plans may also be impacted by some Heroes Act changes.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7082</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Same-Sex Marriages: What Do They Mean for Your Benefit Plans?</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/325775788/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7081</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>On May 15 of this year, the California Supreme Court held that same-sex couples must be permitted to legally marry in California. According to the decision, the failure to designate the relationship of a same-sex couple as a marriage violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution. When the decision takes effect on June 14, 2008, California will join Massachusetts as the only states that recognize same-sex marriages.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7081</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>July 2008 Immigration Update (pdf).</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/324898252/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7080</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>This update discusses recent developments in immigration law from the U.S. Departments of Homeland Security and State.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7080</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>An Employers Right to Monitor E-Mail and Text Messages Remains Strong.</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/324881765/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7079</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Employers continue to have the right to access, monitor, and review an employees use of e-mail and text messages when that employee is using company-provided technology. Yet, recent publicity of a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision has created a new buzz about the privacy rights of employees. This new decision, however, does not create an exception to the generally accepted rule: employees do not have an expectation of privacy in the communications that they send with company-provided technology. To the contrary, it outlines the importance of consistent and appropriate enforcement of electronic use policies.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7079</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Using Your Cell Phone While Driving: Doesn't Everyone?</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/324881766/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7078</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>It's difficult to drive anywhere these days without seeing fellow motorists intensely engaged, if not distracted by, cell phone conversations. And, amazingly, some drivers find it feasible (or think they do) to multi-task by typing Blackberry or text messages from behind the wheel. Do you think some or most of your employees may be doing this? If so, are they just risking having an accident for which they may be responsible, or are they also putting your company at risk as well? This latter question was addressed and answered by a decision of the Georgia Court of Appeals. Hunter v. Modern Continental Construction Co.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7078</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>New GINA Law Also Affects Wage/Hour Provisions.</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/324881767/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7077</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>A little-noticed part of the recently-enacted federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) has substantially increased the potential monetary exposure for employers who violate the federal Fair Labor Standards Act's child-labor restrictions. These changes took effect when President Bush signed the law on May 21, 2008.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7077</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Keeping an Eye on Labor and Employment Legislation.</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/324881768/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7076</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>In a previous issue we took a look at several pending laws that would drastically change the labor and employment scene ("Cute Titles for Bad Laws" by John Zenor, Labor Letter, May 2008). This month we'll review a few more pieces of pending legislation.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7076</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Improved DOL Website Helps Employers Comply.</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/324881769/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7075</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>In May, the U.S. Labor Department rolled out its FirstStep Recordkeeping, Reporting and Notices elaws Advisor. This Advisor is another attempt by the DOL to help employers comply with some of the major federal labor and employment laws.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7075</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Class Claims of Pay Discrimination After Ledbetter.</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EmploymentLawArticles/~3/324041540/newscount.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 7074</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>The Supreme Courts Ledbetter decision invalidates traditional class claims of pay discrimination and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs' (OFCCP) pay discrimination standards.</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=7074</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>

</rss>
