<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4282975595580545221</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2024 15:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Energ Analytics</title><description></description><link>http://energanalytics.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4282975595580545221.post-9034970818850442850</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2015-01-25T16:32:40.055-08:00</atom:updated><title>Better XRF Analysis isn&#39;t Magic..</title><description>Most XRF manufacturers provide a reasonably good general soil or mining calibrations for their handheld analyzers. Technology in the 21st century is amazing. However, it&#39;s not magic. Material compositions vary so widely, chemistry results can be marginal;
 even with type-standardization.
This translates into lost revenue and process inefficiencies.  Now your XRF 
analyzer can deliver more rapid, accurate quantitative elemental analysis with custom calibrations.</description><link>http://energanalytics.blogspot.com/2015/01/better-xrf-analysis-isnt-magic.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>