2014 will be the 100th anniversary

James Gibb Stuart, author of the Money Bomb – banned from the shops in 1983 – as the ground breaking book wrote this article about the Bradburys.

The writers of the Bank of England Act 1694 knew about the power of creating money and trading with it aka usury or making money out of money – the deadly sin of riba in Islam. In 1913 the Federal Reserve followed suit. Syria and Iran are the only countries left without a Central Bank a la Anselm Rothschild:

“Give me the power to issue a nation’s money; then I do not care who makes the law.”

After having organised the Forum for Stable Currencies in Westminster since 1998 and learned about money as the CAUSE, I concentrated on the EFFECTS: victims of white collar crimes.

Lord Sudeley, our co-founder, suggested to group cases to change the law.

Today I conclude:

1. successive governments have eroded the Sovereignty and Seignorage – the Legal Privilege and Financial Mechanism of Nation States – especially since the Federal Reserve was founded in 1913
2. dishonest money funds the ‘public gravy train’ that finances criminal behaviour by courts, bent judges, barristers, solicitors from hell, police, prison and, especially, Social Workers from Hell
3. comparable to central banks acting as ‘lender of last resort’, ethical governments should use ‘treasury money‘ and act as compensator of last resort to compensate the hundreds of thousands of victims of white collar criminals – starting with all illegal wars despite international treaties and ending with child snatching as the most heinous of all white collar crimes.

It is soo sad, but weeping doesn’t help. It is soo tragic but no choir of a Greek tragedy would give justice to the collective suffering imposed by public officials. I just want to sing, I want to scream, I want to shout: parents and grandparents unite!

• Children Placed in Foster Care is our petition before the House of Commons that is your opportunity for writing and talking to your MP
• Abolish Adoption without Parental Consent is still collecting signatures while waiting for the petitions committee in Brussels to act
• Sir James Munby has published a judgement about ‘Baby J‘ that has made the news and includes the call to courts to adapt to the realities of the internet and especially social media! [paragraph 1]

And I want to write: governments wake up! 2015 will have to become the election of an ethical Parliament! MPs will have to support parents and grandparents whose children were stolen under false pretences and the secrecy of family courts!

I want to fell like a million Bradburies next year! You, too?

Related articles

• TO EDWARD TIMPSON MP: Return our Stolen Children – our letter to the Prime Minister (mckenzie-friends.co.uk)
• Bring Back the Bradbury Pound – Free Bradbury E-book Now Available (antioligarch.wordpress.com)
• Payouts for older victims of Equitable Life scandal: Thousands will get compensation up to a year earlier than expected (dailymail.co.uk)
• A FLAW in the Monetary System? (publicdebts.org.uk)
• EXCEPTIONAL and extreme cases of maladministration and mismanagement? (victims-unite.net)
• White Collar Crime: The Classification System, Organized Crime, and Transnational Corporations (kwetoday.com)
• Why aren’t the honest bankers demanding prosecutions of their dishonest rivals? (ritholtz.com)
• TODAY: 99th Anniversary of the Bradbury Pound – historic precedence of Government issued ‘Credit’ (forumforstablecurrencies.info)
• Bankers, Bradburys and Greenbacks – A Magical Pill for ALL of Britain’s Ailments! – Mike W. (inquiringminds.cc)

Former New York Times journalist Chris Hedges makes the point – quoted in the latest Media Lens briefing:

‘The trolls dominate or have neutralized every major institution in the country on behalf of their corporate paymasters. The press, education, Wall Street, labor and our political parties are managed by trolls or have been destroyed by them.

‘Sometimes these trolls speak like liberals. Sometimes they speak like conservatives. Sometimes they are secular. Sometimes they are Christians. But the language they use is a cover for the relentless march toward a totalitarian capitalism and a kingdom where the trolls, if not the rest of us, live happily ever after.

Deceived and disempowered

Rick Perry and John Boehner overtly make war on Social Security. Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi say they would like to save Social Security but are sadly powerless before the decisions of a congressional super committee they helped form. The result, of course, is the same. We get to choose the rhetoric and manner in which we are deceived and disempowered. Nothing more.’

Hedges concludes: ‘The corporate coup is over. We have lost.’

In other words, we are nations under corporate occupation. The coup that has deprived us of some of our most basic freedoms – the freedom to choose governments that serve people rather than profit; to choose genuinely independent, uncompromised mass media that serve truth rather than power – cannot conceivably, as a matter of elementary logic, be in the business of exporting democracy abroad. It can only be in the business of business – maximised profits and control. It really is that simple.

This passage was taken from Media Lens’: To Avert A Bloodbath – Libya And The Press – Part 1

Related articles

• The Election March of the Trolls by Chris Hedges (dandelionsalad.wordpress.com)
• Chris Hedges: Obama: Brand for the Corporate State (via Dandelion Salad) (allianceforanidiotfreeamerica.wordpress.com)

It generally implies NOT to have the money to instruct a solicitor.

And solicitors may have been part of the problem in the first place.

The only way to ‘fight back’ may therefore be as a Litigant in Person (LIP). This is a harrowing experience for many different reasons.

This blog is the result of victim experiences first hand.

Related articles

• WANTED: Good Barristers for Victims of White Collar Crimes (bestbarristers.wordpress.com)
• Family Courts without a Lawyer: A Handbook for Litigants in Person [Paperback] (alisonsgypt.wordpress.com)
• Pure Public Interest Cases – without benefit from the litigation – don’t deserve legal aid funding (victims-unite.net)

1. Minister, how many horrible cases of baby snatching do you need?
2. “To avoid prejudice in the case”, don’t publish the name of the snatched baby and his mother…
3. In the Virtual Court of Public Opinion: how many men does it take to remove a sick baby from his mother’s breast?

Please spread this far and wide. Make use of the phone numbers. Make it clear to those concerned that their behaviour is unacceptable.

Phone numbers:

Ammonford Police: 01267 222020
Swansea Social Services: 01792 635700
Cafcass Swansea: 01792 645535

In scenes reminiscent of Nazi Germany, a 13 week old baby was wrenched from the breast of his mother by a female police officer at 4.30 a.m. today, in Ammonford police station, South Wales. The baby was then handed to a scruffy, unkempt single male “social worker”, who strapped him into a hard plastic car seat on a very cold night, with no addition blankets or soft toys, and drove off to an unknown destination. The mother’s partner, as well as other family members and friends present, were sickened at the cold cruelty of the collaborative action by police and Swansea Social Services.

The events in the police station took place after the mother had walked out of a secret Neath Court hearing which took place on Wednesday and Thursday earlier this week, where Swansea Social Services were attempting to remove her child. During the court proceedings, held under Statute Law, the mother challenged the lawfulness of the Court, correctly and accurately stating that Statute Law Courts are unlawful under Common Law. Despite repeated declarations by the lady judge that all parties in the Court were independent, the brave mother also exposed that the proceedings were unlawfully biased against her, her partner and their baby, by fact that a signed Contract of Partnership existed between the Family Law Division and Cafcass. Holding a copy of the signed Contract, the mother asked how the bench could be both independent and within a partnership contract.

Further bias was shown in the Court, in that Swansea Social Services staff, called as witnesses, were allowed to remain in Court throughout proceedings. The parents, however, were denied the right for their own family witnesses to be in Court to observe proceedings. McKenzie friends, acting for the parents in court were shocked to watch as a female Social Service worker was blatantly coached by her colleagues at the rear of the Court, whilst she gave testimony against the mother from the witness box. Alerted by the mother, the Judge refused to take action.

Following a difficult earlier life which had resulted in Social Services taking other children from her on the fictitious claim of emotional harm, two children later returned home to the mother with horrifying stories of abuse in Social Services care. Contrary to the ‘personality disorder’ picture painted by Swansea Social services, the children were even prepared to write their own statements as to the loving care they had received from their mother, both during her period on alcohol and drugs, and subsequently since she had started a new life, in a new home, with the hard working and loving father of her new child.

Harassed by Swansea Social Services since before the birth of her latest child, bullied with up to 16 telephone calls from them in a single day, suffering a stream of different and unknown social workers at her door every week, as well as aggressive calls from Swansea Legal Services, the mother was totally failed by the poor, if not incompetent, performance of her Legal Team. Knowing from previous experience that Social Services were now set on taking her newborn son, she decided to act for herself as Litigant in Person, assisted by two members of the public.

Despite being exhausted by disturbed nights with her baby, the need to leave the Court to breastfeed, and being untrained in law, this exceptional and loving mother was able to expose that the Court proceedings were both biased and unlawful. She also exposed that previous Court Orders were unlawful, in that they contained no signatures. Family members highlighted that psychological reports, alleging that the mother had a personality disorder, had also been exposed as liable to errors, and were based on pseudo scientific theory. A psychologist had also recommended ‘treatment’ for the Christian mother based on Buddhist meditation mantras.

Walking out of the Court in disgust, the exhausted mother sought refuge for a few days to recover, before resuming the fight to protect her child. This action was to unleash a massive police search in the South West of England, before the mother was finally arrested by South Wales police at 1.30 in the morning on her way back to her parents. Witnesses to the police action watched with incredulity as five police cars, festooned with blue flashing lights, stopped cars carrying the mother and her baby. Those present at the scene report that the ten police officers present were cold and aggressive in their haste to pull the mother and her child from the car, before racing off at speeds over 70 mph to Ammonford police station.

Desperate to stop the baby being given to the grubby South Wales Social Worker, the mother’s parents and friends had demanded to see the Court Order authorising the police and Swansea Social Services’ action. They were appalled to be given a Swansea Court Order containing no Court Stamp and no signature – omissions which render the document invalid at law.

Despite his dependence on his mother’s breast milk, due to a serious allergy to formula milk products which could result in his death, his parents and friends now have no idea of the location of the baby, or the quality of his care.

Readers of the story will be further alarmed to know that Swansea Social Services are under ongoing investigation for incompetence and allegedly dangerous practices which have placed other children in harm. That this can be done via unlawful and secret Family Courts, and with the full collusion of the police, is a state of affairs that should drive every person to demand immediate investigative action from their Member of Parliament. After all, these are the very people responsible for overseeing these disgraceful and disturbing events.

We should perhaps remember that a vicious part the Nazi system established itself through a creeping infiltration of the social services responsible for the care of the physically and mentally disabled. We have been warned.

More on state kidnapping here.

And here’s Christopher Booker in The Telegraph reporting Parents denied a voice in court against the child-snatchers, where Lord Justice Thorpe in the Court of Appeal ‘aghast’ at the way three children and been removed from their family.

Dear Mr Speed

This is to invite you or someone else in your department to a meeting that will take place tomorrow, Tuesday, between 2 and 4 in Committee Room 16 of the House of Commons. Whilst I don’t expect you to attend at such short notice, I thought you might want to send Shona Manson whom we’ve been in touch with, or somebody else we can work with.

My main reason for inviting you is your stance on punishing dishonesty and other unethical behaviour. To give you a feel for what to expect, I attach three documents pertaining to the meeting as well as the most scandalous bankruptcy we are aware of: Mr David Fabb. One of the judges involved said: “This bankruptcy order ought not have been made. But I am using my “judicial discretion” not to annul it.” How is that supposed to increase our confidence in your system and procedures, I wonder?

Our group has accumulated a vast amount of evidence and knowledge about slippages in the Courts that your Service seems to miss, when Bankruptcy Orders are issued based on false documents, forms and evidence.

And while I appreciate that you don’t deal with individual cases, we have accumulated summaries of many to demonstrate what we know. It would therefore help if you were to support us in our efforts to annul bankruptcy orders that we found to be legally invalid and thus null and void.

Dr Vincent Cable is quite aware of our group efforts. Hence I would appreciate your collaboration.

With many thanks in advance,

Sabine K McNeill
_________________

And here’s the answer that I got:

Dear Ms McNeill,

Thank you for your invitation of 24 January. Mr Speed has asked me to reply on his behalf, I apologise that I did not have an opportunity to do so in advance of the meeting last week.

The role of The Insolvency Service is to administer insolvent estates following orders of the court. Concerns members of the Forum have about the Court Service or the actions of the Judiciary are a matter for the Ministry of Justice and not The Insolvency Service.

Official receivers have neither the authority nor the resources to investigate or challenge documentation which has been considered by the court. If you have the evidence that bankruptcy orders were made on false documentation, forms and evidence then the correct route is for the individual to ask the court to annul the bankruptcy order. This is a matter between the individual, the petitioning creditor and the court.

There is an established review and appeal process for individuals who wish to challenge the findings of the court. Any party to proceedings who believes a judge has incorrectly applied the law or erred in the exercise of his / her discretion has a right of appeal to a higher court.

Yours sincerely,

Shona Manson

I began the meeting when Nic Dakin arrived, the marvellously supportive MP of victim veteran Stanley Embling.

Bankrupt victim and expert in bankruptcy law Gedaljahu Ebert:

Here we see victim David Fabb, whose group of ten solvent companies was bankrupted by accountancy company Deloittes.

Here we see Alex Cunningham, MP for Stockton North:

Here we see the very experienced Peter Oakes speaking

and here Mr Ebert for a second time:

Those videos that were too long for this blog can be viewed on http://bit.ly/hFbs3h

• Targeted individual Maurice Kirk
• Myself about Royal Charters and the Public Inquiry
• Most experienced Paul Talbot-Jenkins
• House of Lords Host Lord Ahmed
• Chairman Austin Mitchell MP – part 1
• Chairman Austin Mitchell MP – part 2
• Supportive MP John Hemming
• Supportive MP John McDonnell.

Here is the English version.

And here is the report that gave rise to include victims of state kidnapping in our list.

Under UK News & Views, it has opened a category Victims Unite and published two stories so far.