<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA - Latest Articles]]></title>
    <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/toc/9900/00000</link>
    <description><![CDATA[The European Journal of Anaesthesiology publishes original work of high scientific quality, including laboratory work of clinical relevance. Subscribe today!]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 20:33:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Wolters Kluwer Health RSS Generator</generator>
    
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/incidence_of_transient_sinus_pause_in_cardiac.331.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Lee, Yea-Ji; Lee, Sookyung; Kim, Jong Won; Oh, Chung-Sik; Kim, Tae-Yop]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Incidence of transient sinus pause in cardiac rhythm increases with the use of hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blade compared to standard angle blade during tracheal intubation: A prospective randomised controlled trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/incidence_of_transient_sinus_pause_in_cardiac.331.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00331.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

The hyperanglulated videolaryngoscope blade may exert different forces on the larynx compared to the standard angle blade, potentially leading to haemodynamic changes, particularly in cardiac rhythm.

OBJECTIVE 

This study aimed to investigate the impact of the hyperangulated blade on haemodynamic changes during tracheal intubation.

DESIGN 

A prospective randomised controlled trial.

SETTING 

Tertiary, university hospital, single centre.

PATIENTS 

A total of 134 patients scheduled for general anaesthesia were included in the final analysis

INTERVENTION 

Tracheal intubation using either a standard angle videolaryngoscope blade (Standard group) or a hyperangulated blade (Hyperangulated group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

The occurrence of a transient decrease in heart rate or a transient sinus pause during tracheal intubation was recorded.

RESULTS 

The incidence of transient sinus pause was significantly higher in the Hyperangulated group compared to the Standard group (19% vs. 4%, respectively, P = 0.009). The percentage of the glottic opening score was significantly higher, and the incidence of backward, upward, and rightward pressure was significantly lower in the Hyperangulated group. The incidences of direct epiglottis lifting was significantly higher in the Hyperangulated group, and the total length of time of the blade in the mouth was significantly longer in the Hyperangulated group. Multivariate logistic analysis identified the use of a hyperangulated blade as an independent predictor of transient sinus pause during tracheal intubation (odds ratio = 5.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.53 to 21.53; P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION 

The hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blade is associated with a higher incidence of transient sinus pause than the standard angle blade during tracheal intubation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

Clinical Research Information Service. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health and Welfare (Republic of Korea). (Identifier: KCT0006534). Online address: http://cris.nih.go.kr.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002243, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002243]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00331</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/inefficiency_of_silica_zeolite_based_scavenging_of.330.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Bracco, David]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[SHORT SCIENTIFIC REPORT]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Inefficiency of silica zeolite based scavenging of sevoflurane in a clinical practice setting]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/inefficiency_of_silica_zeolite_based_scavenging_of.330.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00330.T1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>No abstract available]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002242, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002242]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00330</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/multimodal_prehabilitation_as_a_strategy_to_reduce.328.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[López-Hernández, Antonio; Gimeno-Santos, Elena; Navarro-Ripoll, Ricard; Arguis, María José; López-Baamonde, Manuel; Sanz-de la Garza, María; Sandoval, Elena; Castellà, Manel; Martínez-Palli, Graciela]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Multimodal prehabilitation as a strategy to reduce postoperative complications in cardiac surgery: A randomised controlled trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/multimodal_prehabilitation_as_a_strategy_to_reduce.328.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00328.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

Prehabilitation has shown efficacy in improving postoperative outcomes in abdominal surgery. Data on cardiac surgery are controversial.

OBJECTIVE 

To determine if a multimodal prehabilitation programme reduces the rate of postoperative complications after elective cardiac surgery.

DESIGN 

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING 

Single-centre study in a tertiary hospital with inclusion period spanned from March 2018 to June 2021.

PATIENTS 

One hundred and fifty-one patients, with an expected waiting time before surgery of 6 weeks or more, completed the study. Excluded were those with functional, anatomical or cognitive impairment; cardiac instability; dynamic left ventricle outflow tract obstruction or proven exercise-induced arrhythmias.

INTERVENTION 

Four to six weeks of a multimodal prehabilitation programme, including exercise training, psychological and nutritional support.

MAIN OUTCOME 

Incidence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS 

No differences were found in the rate of postoperative complications (80% in both groups, P = 0.968), most of which were mild, with a Comprehensive Complication Index of 21 and more than 70% with Clavien–Dindo grade I or II. Prehabilitated patients showed a significant improvement in endurance time assessed by a constant-work rate cycling exercise test: preintervention vs. postintervention (301 ± 109 vs. 578 ± 257 s, P = 0.001), and in 6-min walk test (6MWT) (487 ± 77 vs. 504 ± 74 min, P = 0.001). No patients experienced adverse events attributable to the intervention. A sub-analysis restricted to prehabilitated patients who showed a meaningful response to exercise assessed by the 6MWT (increase ≥ 30 m) showed a reduction in the number and severity of postoperative complications, compared to nonresponders (1.1 ± 0.9 vs. 2 ± 2 complications per patient, P = 0.038); and the Comprehensive Complication Index (16 ± 15 vs. 25 ± 19, P = 0.044).

CONCLUSION 

A multimodal prehabilitation programme before elective cardiac surgery did not reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, when analysis was restricted to meaningful responders to intervention, a significant reduction in postoperative complications and their severity was observed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03466606).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002236, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002236]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00328</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/the_effect_of_methylprednisolone_on_the_reversal.329.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Büyükcavlak, Mustafa; Tire, Yasin; Mermer, Aydin; Yüce, Muhammet S.; Yildirim, Şerife N.; Kozanhan, Betül]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[The effect of methylprednisolone on the reversal time of rocuronium by sugammadex in the paediatric patient group: A randomised controlled trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/the_effect_of_methylprednisolone_on_the_reversal.329.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00329.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

Sugammadex is an effective agent for reversing aminosteroid neuromuscular blocking agents, but its effectiveness can be influenced by interactions with steroid-based drugs. Previous studies suggest corticosteroids may affect sugammadex effectiveness, but data on methylprednisolone in paediatric patients is limited.

OBJECTIVE 

This study aimed to determine whether methylprednisolone administration at induction affects the reversal time of rocuronium by sugammadex.

DESIGN 

Single centre, double blinded, randomised controlled trial.

SETTINGS 

Turkish tertiary care centre from September 2024 to January 2025.

STUDY POPULATION 

Paediatric patients undergoing elective adenoidectomy and/or tonsillectomy.

INTERVENTION(S) 

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either methylprednisolone 1 mg kg−1 (group M) or a placebo (group C) with anaesthesia induction. Neuromuscular block was induced with rocuronium, monitored using acceleromyography and reversed with sugammadex 2 mg kg−1 at the end of surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEAURES 

The primary outcome was the reversal time of rocuronium by sugammadex: time from sugammadex administration at train of four (TOF) count = 2 to a TOF ratio of ≥0.9 of baseline. Secondary outcomes included extubation time (time from sugammadex administration at TOF count = 2 to extubation), postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting scores, and incidence of adverse events (stridor, hoarseness, severe cough and desaturation).

RESULTS 

At 89 ± 20.3 s, the reversal time of rocuronium by sugammadex was statistically significantly longer in group M compared with the 54.6 ± 9.3 s of group C (P < 0.001). The mean with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference was 34.5 (27.3 to 41.6) s. The extubation time was also significantly prolonged in group M compared with group C: 426.8 ± 134.4 vs. 331.3 ± 129.0 s (P = 0.002) with a difference of 95.5 (95% CI, 36.8 to 154.2) s. No significant differences were observed in postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting scores, or frequency of adverse events.

CONCLUSION 

Although methylprednisolone administration resulted in a significantly prolonged reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by sugammadex and subsequent delayed extubation, the clinical importance of this interaction is minor.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06623370]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002241, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002241]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00329</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/editorial_commitment_to_trust_and_integrity_in.327.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Palermo, Tonya M.; Bouhassira, Didier; Davis, Karen D.; Hemmings, Hugh C. Jr; Hurley, Robert W.; Katz, Joel; Pandit, Jaideep J.; Price, Theodore J.; Schatman, Michael E.; Schwarz, Stephan K.W.; Turk, Dennis C.; Van de Velde, Marc; Wiles, Matthew D.; Yaksh, Tony L.; Yarnitsky, David]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[EDITORIAL]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anaesthesiology research]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/editorial_commitment_to_trust_and_integrity_in.327.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00327.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>No abstract available]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002237, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002237]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00327</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/post_discharge_digital_health_technology.326.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Bentsen, Signe Berit; Stjernberg, Mi; Ræder, Johan; Eide, Geir Egil; Tvedt, Marianne Nesbjørg; Hegland, Pål Andre]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Post discharge digital health technology interventions in ambulatory surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/post_discharge_digital_health_technology.326.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00326.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

Given the early discharge associated with ambulatory surgery, digital health interventions (DHIs) may be useful in out of hospital follow-up. However, there are no systematic reviews concerning the use of DHIs in this setting.

OBJECTIVE 

To identify and evaluate the effects of DHIs on, patient safety, patient experience, and efficiency in post discharge ambulatory surgery.

DESIGN 

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation were used.

DATA SOURCES 

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to 9 October 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs); ambulatory surgical patients ≥18 years; post discharge digital health interventions, including but not limited to computer tablets, mobile applications, and smart phones. Control group interventions included post discharge follow-up by a general practitioner, office-based follow-up, telephone follow-up, or no intervention.

RESULTS 

Six RCTs, with a total of 1397 patients were included. The meta-analyses showed no significant effects of DHIs compared with control group interventions on average pain intensity during postoperative days one to three, standardised mean difference = −0.15 (95% CI, −0.66 to 0.35), P = 0.556, or on unplanned healthcare encounters up to six months postoperatively, relative risk = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.05), P = 0.580. A review of individual articles showed that patients in the DHI groups reported significantly less impaired sleep, mood swings, stress, dizziness, headaches, sore mouth, constipation, and wound-related problems. Additionally, costs were lower, and patients reported improved functional status and well being compared with the control group. The risk of bias varied from low to moderate and the quality of evidence was low.

CONCLUSIONS 

Digital health interventions may reduce some symptoms and costs following discharge from ambulatory surgery, while improving quality of life. However, uncertainty remains due to the limited number of studies, some inconsistent results, and the low certainty of evidence.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002233, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002233]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00326</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/ultrasonographic_assessment_of_sugammadex_enhanced.324.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Park, Jung-Bin; Kim, Tae-Won; Ji, Sang-Hwan; Jang, Young-Eun; Kim, Eun-Hee; Kim, Jin-Tae; Kim, Hee-Soo; Lee, Ji-Hyun]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Ultrasonographic assessment of sugammadex-enhanced early recovery of diaphragmatic function in children: A randomised double-blind controlled trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/ultrasonographic_assessment_of_sugammadex_enhanced.324.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00324.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

In adults, sugammadex promotes faster neuromuscular recovery compared with neostigmine; however, its impact on diaphragmatic recovery and atelectasis in children remains unelucidated.

OBJECTIVES 

We compared the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine on restoration of diaphragmatic function and postoperative atelectasis in paediatric patients.

DESIGN 

A prospective randomised controlled study

SETTING 

Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

PATIENTS 

A total of 73 children aged 2 to 7 years were randomised to receive either sugammadex (2 mg kg-1, n = 36) or neostigmine (0.02 mg kg-1, n = 37) for neuromuscular blockade reversal when the train-of-four count reached 4 (train-of-four ratio < 0.9).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

The diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and thickening fraction (TF) were measured by ultrasound at three timepoints: baseline (T0), before postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission (T1) and 30 min after PACU admission (T2). Atelectasis was assessed via lung ultrasonography at T1 and T2. The primary outcome was the diaphragmatic excursion ratio at T1 (DET1/DET0), and secondary outcomes included the DET2/DET0, TFT1/TFT0, TFT2/TFT0 atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis.

RESULTS 

At T1, the DET1/DET0 was significantly higher in the sugammadex group (neostigmine vs. sugammadex group, 0.91 ± 0.19 vs. 1.02 ± 0.24; P = 0.034) as was the TFT1/TFT0 (0.93 ± 0.39 vs. 1.15 ± 0.49; P = 0.041). No significant intergroup differences were found in the DET2/DET0 and TFT2/TFT0. The atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS 

Compared to neostigmine, sugammadex accelerates diaphragmatic recovery immediately after extubation; however, this early recovery does not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER 

NCT05724550]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002231, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002231]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00324</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/mean_arterial_pressure_is_all_you_need_in_a.325.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Tschoellitsch, Thomas; Kaltenleithner, Sophie; Maletzky, Alexander; Moser, Philipp; Seidl, Philipp; Böck, Carl; Thumfart, Stefan; Giretzlehner, Michael; Hochreiter, Sepp; Meier, Jens]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Mean arterial pressure is all you need in a machine learning model for mean arterial pressure prediction]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/mean_arterial_pressure_is_all_you_need_in_a.325.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00325.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

Anaesthesiology and intensive care use monitoring to identify patients in danger of deterioration. Traditionally, trends and early warning scores allow clinicians to predict deterioration with moderate reliability. Reduced mean arterial blood pressure has been associated with complications, and models have been sought to predict its value. Machine learning methods with complex inputs have been used for predictive monitoring in hospital care.

OBJECTIVES 

This study evaluates whether machine learning can predict mean arterial pressure (MAP) from previous values.

DESIGN 

This is a monocentre, retrospective, exploratory, observational cohort study using the MIMIC-III-WDB, VitalDB and an internal study centre dataset, training machine learning models on adult patients with invasively measured blood pressure (IBP) as input during an observation window up to 20 min before the prediction horizon (5 to 20 min).

SETTING 

Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.

PARTICIPANTS 

Two thousand three hundred and forty-six patients from the internal dataset, 4741 patients from MIMIC-III-WDB and 3357 patients from VitalDB were analysed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

The primary endpoint was model performance in predicting whether MAP would fall below 65 mmHg in a given time frame. In a secondary analysis, we restricted the input set to stable patients with current MAP above 65 mmHg.

RESULTS 

Models using the complete training data achieved receiver operating characteristic area under the curves (ROC AUCs) of 0.963, 0.946, 0.934 and 0.923 on the internal dataset for 5, 10, 15 and 20 min of prediction horizon, respectively, and 0.856, 0.837, 0.821 and 0.804 in the secondary analysis. The maximum difference of ROC AUC to baseline measurement (ROC AUC of last measured MAP as trivial estimator) was 0.006 for the complete training data and 0.051 for stable patients. The prediction of MAP may allow clinicians to intervene in time before MAP deterioration becomes clinically relevant.

CONCLUSION 

Predicting MAP below 65 mmHg within 5, 10, 15 and 20 min for patients with and without a MAP above 65 mmHg is possible and requires only MAP as input for machine learning models.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05471193)]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002238, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002238]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00325</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/_the_trachea_heals_but_the_hypoxia_does_not__an.323.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Asgeirsdottir, Sigrun; Karlsson, Elias K.; Sigurdsson, Theodor]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[CASE REPORT]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[‘The trachea heals but the hypoxia does not’ an emergency front-of-neck access in a 4-year-old with foreign body airway obstruction]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/_the_trachea_heals_but_the_hypoxia_does_not__an.323.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00323.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>‘Can’t Intubate Can’t Oxygenate’ (CICO) situation is a life-threatening emergency, and an uncommon event in the healthy paediatric population. In children without anatomical airway anomalies, this scenario is most often due to laryngospasm or airway obstruction and can in most cases, be reversed with appropriate medical treatment or removal of the foreign body.

This case report describes an emergency front-of-neck surgical airway (eFONA) with a scalpel–bougie–tube method, during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a 4-year-old child due to foreign body airway obstruction.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002230, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002230]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00323</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/new_onset_postoperative_hypotension_in_patients.322.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Hoppe, Phillip; Chang, Yuan; Schwarz, Tobias; Bergholz, Alina; Thomsen, Kristen K.; Kröker, Alina; Flick, Moritz; Krause, Linda; Sessler, Daniel I.; Saugel, Bernd]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[New-onset postoperative hypotension in patients recovering from noncardiac surgery: A prospective observational study]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/new_onset_postoperative_hypotension_in_patients.322.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00322.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

It remains unknown whether postoperative mean arterial pressures less than 65 mmHg constitute clinically important hypotension for individual patients, or might be within their normal pressure range.

OBJECTIVE 

We aimed to evaluate postoperative arterial pressure in patients recovering from noncardiac surgery and determine the proportion of patients in whom a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg constitutes new-onset postoperative hypotension.

DESIGN 

A prospective observational study.

SETTING 

German university medical centre between October 2020 and September 2021.

PATIENTS 

Patients with elevated cardiovascular risk recovering on general wards from noncardiac surgery under general anaesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

Before and after surgery, we automatically measured arterial pressure at 30-min intervals for about 24 h. We considered patients to have new-onset postoperative hypotension when they had a postoperative mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg, and their lowest postoperative mean arterial pressure was at least 5 mmHg below their lowest pre-operative mean arterial pressure.

RESULTS 

We enrolled 307 patients and included 248 in the final analysis. The median [IQR] duration of surgery was 62 [40 to 90] min. Postoperative mean arterial pressure was less than 65 mmHg at least once in 101 patients (41%). In 44 of these 101 patients (44%; 18% of all 248 patients), postoperative mean arterial pressures less than 65 mmHg constituted new-onset postoperative hypotension. In 57 of these 101 patients (56%; 23% of all 248 patients), postoperative mean arterial pressures less than 65 mmHg did not constitute new-onset postoperative hypotension.

CONCLUSION 

About 40% of our patients recovering from noncardiac surgery on general wards had at least one postoperative mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg, and about half of these patients had new-onset postoperative hypotension.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002227, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002227]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00322</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/comparison_of_analgesic_efficacy_and_safety_of.317.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Agarwal, Ayushi; Shah, Shreya B.; Sinha, Renu; Prasad, Ganga; Prakash, Kelika; Goel, Prabudh]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety of caudal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal dexmedetomidine in paediatric infraumbilical surgeries: A randomised controlled trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/comparison_of_analgesic_efficacy_and_safety_of.317.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00317.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

The established analgesic efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine in children has demonstrated a rise in its use and various administration routes have been explored. However, clinical comparisons between caudal and intranasal dexmedetomidine are lacking.

OBJECTIVES 

We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy, postanaesthesia recovery characteristics and side effects associated with caudal versus intranasal dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to a single-shot caudal block in paediatric infraumbilical surgeries.

DESIGN 

A noninferiority randomised controlled trial.

SETTING 

A tertiary care hospital from November 2022 to May 2024.

PATIENTS 

Sixty-four children aged 1 to 8 years undergoing infraumbilical surgeries under general anaesthesia supplemented with caudal analgesia.

INTERVENTIONS 

Patients were randomised to receive either caudal dexmedetomidine (1 ml kg−1 caudal 0.2% ropivacaine + 1 μg kg−1 caudal dexmedetomidine) or intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 ml kg−1 caudal 0.2% ropivacaine + 1 μg kg−1 intranasal dexmedetomidine).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

The primary outcome was the duration of postoperative analgesia. Other outcomes assessed included postoperative pain scores, peri-operative analgesic consumption, peri-operative haemodynamics, postoperative recovery profile and adverse events for 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS 

The duration of postoperative analgesia in caudal and intranasal group was 527 ± 83 and 545 ± 90 min, respectively (P 
                                 = 0.422). There was a comparable decrease in the intra-operative heart rate. The greater number of episodes of intra-operative hypotension in the caudal group (P 
                                 = 0.016) did not warrant vasopressors. Children in the caudal group were more sedated until 2 h postsurgery following which the sedation scores in both the groups were equivalent. Postoperative pain scores, peri-operative analgesic consumption and the incidence of emergence delirium was comparable. No adverse events were reported in either group.

CONCLUSION 

Intranasal dexmedetomidine can be considered a feasible analgesic adjunct to a single-injection caudal block in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries associated with a smooth recovery profile and no associated adverse effects.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION 

Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2022/09/045492; http://www.ctri.nic.in).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002228, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002228]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00317</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/remimazolam_tosylate_or_propofol_and_delirium_in.318.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Cai, Wenlan; Shen, Fangming; Zhu, Lanyue; Xue, Yuqing; Sun, Menghan; Tan, Xiaoxiang; Shi, Kaikai; Chen, Yuzhou; Sun, Jie]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Remimazolam tosylate or propofol and delirium in frail elderly patients after hip surgery: A randomised controlled clinical trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/remimazolam_tosylate_or_propofol_and_delirium_in.318.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00318.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

Remimazolam tosylate, a novel short-acting benzodiazepine, is increasingly being used in general anaesthesia, but its role in the incidence of postoperative delirium is uncertain, particularly in frail elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE 

To compare the effects of remimazolam tosylate with propofol on the incidence of postoperative delirium in frail elderly patients undergoing hip surgery.

DESIGN 

Randomised, single-centre, single-blind controlled trial.

SETTING 

A tertiary teaching hospital in China, conducted from March to December 2023.

PATIENTS 

Frail elderly patients (Reported Edmonton Frail Scale Score ≥ 6) undergoing hip surgery under general anaesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS 

Patients were randomly assigned to either the propofol or remimazolam group. Both groups received total intravenous anaesthesia following a standardised protocol with either propofol or remimazolam tosylate for induction and maintenance.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative delirium within three postoperative days, assessed twice daily using the 3D Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM). The secondary outcomes included the quality of postoperative recovery and adverse events.

RESULT 

A total of 136 patients were enrolled. The incidence of postoperative delirium was significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group [3 of 68 (4.4%) vs. 12 of 68 (17.6%), risk differece (RD) -13.2%, 95% CI -23.5% to -2.9%, relative risk (RR) 0.25, 95% CI 0.074 to 0.847, NNT 7.6, P = 0.0143]. The incidence of hypotension after induction was also lower in the remimazolam group [16 of 68 (23.5%) vs. 32 of 68 (47.1%), RD -23.5%, 95%CI -39.1% to -8.0%, RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.304 to 0.822, NNT 4.3, P = 0.004], with fewer patients requiring vasopressors [55 of 68 (80.9%) vs. 66 of 68 (97.1%), RD -16.2%, 95% CI -26.3 to -6.0, RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.737 to 0.942, NNT 6.2, P = 0.003]. Notably, the remimazolam group exhibited significantly less burst suppression compared with the propofol group, both in terms of burst suppression time (2.2 s [0 to 17.6] vs. 21.9 s [2.3 to 115.3] median difference = 11.98 s, 95% CI 2.44 to 27.90, P < 0.001) and its proportion relative to the total surgery time (0.3‰ [0 to 2.1] vs. 2.8‰ [0.2 to 14.7], median difference 1.30‰, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.34, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION 

In frail elderly patients, remimazolam tosylate was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative delirium compared with propofol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, Chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2300068632.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002226, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002226]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00318</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/anaesthesia_in_2050__how_emerging_technologies.319.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Leslie, Kate]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Anaesthesia in 2050: how emerging technologies will transform our practice: The Sir Robert Macintosh Lecture 2025]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/anaesthesia_in_2050__how_emerging_technologies.319.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00319.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>In the next 25 years, we will see unprecedented technological progress due to the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. AI-driven advances will be made in five strongly interconnected domains: reenergised drug discovery, continuous real-time monitoring, personalised medicine, automation and decentralised care. Drug discovery will move from in vitro to in silico approaches. We will identify molecules that fit protein targets and protein targets that fit molecules, allowing us to better understand mechanisms of anaesthesia and pain. Improved monitoring of physiological and biological variables will lead to better assessment and prediction of haemodynamics, anaesthetic depth and nociception. Anaesthetic care will be personalised by AI-driven analysis of population, personal and biomarker data, as well as an understanding of the values and wishes of patients. Automation will streamline routine tasks in hospitals, especially in relation to documentation and service delivery. Remote monitoring and assistance systems will help patients receive more of their care at home. The introduction of AI may have unforeseen consequences, especially for equity, sustainability and the future of work. We must think deeply about the future role of anaesthesiologists and ensure that we are involved in redesigning our role. AI can simulate empathy, and will do so increasingly well, but most of us will not be deceived because it is not the human-to-human connection that we crave. Perhaps the greatest gift of AI in anaesthesia practice will be that we come to value what it means to be human.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002234, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002234]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00319</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/continuous_positive_airway_pressure_to_prevent.320.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Pasero, Daniela; Costamagna, Andrea; Filippini, Claudia; Blangetti, Ilaria; Cattaneo, Sergio; Baiocchi, Massimo; Balata, Andrea; Bottiroli, Maurizio; Dambruoso, Pierpaolo; De Paulis, Stefano; Grazioli, Lorenzo; Locatelli, Alessandro; Lorini, Ferdinando Luca; Mascotti, Alessandra; Mondino, Michele Giovanni; Paparella, Domenico; Salvi, Luca; Tonetti, Tommaso; Tritapepe, Luigi; Ranieri, V. Marco]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Continuous positive airway pressure to prevent reintubation in patients recovering from cardiac surgery: A multicentre randomised clinical trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/continuous_positive_airway_pressure_to_prevent.320.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00320.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

Pulmonary complications, including atelectasis and reintubation, are common after cardiac surgery and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Postoperative continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may reduce these risks, but its effectiveness remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES 

To assess whether CPAP reduces the need for reintubation in hypoxaemic patients after cardiac surgery, and to evaluate its effect on other postoperative pulmonary complications.

DESIGN 

Multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial. The study was prematurely terminated due to funding constraints, leading to an underpowered sample.

SETTING 

Ten university-affiliated hospitals across Italy.

PATIENTS 

Adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass who developed a PaO2/FiO2 ratio 200 or less within 1 h of extubation. Exclusion criteria included severe COPD, previous mechanical ventilation and lack of consent.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

The primary endpoint was reintubation within 28 days of surgery. Secondary endpoints included atelectasis, pneumonia, sepsis, mortality and oxygenation.

RESULTS 

The incidence of reintubation was 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.52 to 15.15) in the control group and 8.3% (95% CI, 4.51 to 12.16) in the treatment group (P = 0.3908). In contrast, the occurrence of atelectasis was significantly higher in the control group at 24.1% (95% CI, 18.20 to 30.07) compared with 14.2% (95% CI, 9.38 to 19.05) in the treatment group (P = 0.0110). At 48 h, the incidence of reintubation was significantly lower in the CPAP group 2.94% (95% CI, 0.60 to 5.28) compared with the control group, 7.39% (95% CI, 3.76 to 11.02), P = 0.0425. No significant differences in pneumonia, sepsis or mortality were observed. CPAP significantly improved oxygenation (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION 

CPAP did not significantly reduce 28-day reintubation rates compared with oxygen therapy via Venturi mask. However, CPAP was associated with a significant reduction in atelectasis and early reintubation at 48 h. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and compare CPAP with other noninvasive support strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01726140]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002229, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002229]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00320</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/postmarketing_safety_analysis_of_remimazolam_.315.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Ma, Weiying; Zhang, Rong; Liu, Fan; Cao, Minghui; Huang, Haoquan]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Postmarketing safety analysis of remimazolam: Identifying unlabelled serious events]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/postmarketing_safety_analysis_of_remimazolam_.315.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00315.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

Remimazolam is a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine used in anaesthesia, valued for its rapid metabolism and reversibility. Despite its growing clinical use, a comprehensive assessment of its real-world safety profile remains essential.

OBJECTIVE 

To evaluate the postmarketing safety of remimazolam using adverse event (AE) data from the US and Japanese pharmacovigilance databases.

DESIGN 

Retrospective analysis of AEs associated with remimazolam using disproportionality analysis techniques.

SETTING 

FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER) from January 2020 to December 2023.

PARTICIPANTS 

Patients who experienced remimazolam-related AEs reported in the FAERS and JADER databases.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

Identification of significant AEs using reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network and multiitem gamma Poisson shrinker. Categorisation of AEs using the ’Important Medical Event Terms List’ (IME) list (version 26.1).

RESULTS 

We identified 199 remimazolam-related reports (69 from FAERS, 130 from JADER) revealing 20 significant AEs. Key findings include previously unlabelled serious AEs such as cardiac, cardio-respiratory, and respiratory arrests; nine events classified as Important Medical Events, including hypotension and anaphylaxis; four AEs not included in current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labelling; and low-frequency but clinically significant off-label events including arrhythmias and postoperative delirium.

CONCLUSIONS 

While remimazolam shows a generally acceptable safety profile, our pharmacovigilance analysis identified serious unlabelled reactions requiring clinical vigilance. Practice recommendations include judicious administration with balanced crystalloids and comprehensive cardiorespiratory monitoring. Future research should address prospective surveillance of rare serious events, optimal administration protocols to prevent vascular occlusions and investigation of anaphylactic reactions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

Not applicable.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002217, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002217]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00315</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/guidelines_on_strategies_for_the_universal.312.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Gómez-Ríos, Manuel Á.; Van Zundert, André A.J.; McNarry, Alistair F.; Law, J. Adam; Higgs, Andy; De Jong, Audrey; Jaber, Samir; Karamchandani, Kunal; Hansel, Jan; Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga; Leach, Robert; Guimaraes, Helio Penna; Abad-Gurumeta, Alfredo; Gómez-Ríos, David; Michalek, Pavel; Berkow, Lauren C.; Fernández-Vaquero, Miguel Á.; Serrano-Moraza, Alfredo; Gaitini, Luis; Vaida, Sonia; Somri, Mostafa; Gaszyński, Tomasz; Brewster, David; Desai, Neel; Saracoglu, Ayten; Tsan, Samuel Ern Hung; Athanassoglou, Vassilis; Komasawa, Nobuyasu; Garg, Rakesh; Shamim, Faisal; Rajendram, Rajkumar; Gutierrez-Couto, Uxía; López, Teresa; De Luis-Cabezón, Nekari; Flores, Daniel Tevar; Garzón, José Carlos; Sastre, José A.; Roca de Togores López, Andrés; Meléndez-Salinas, Diego; Fandiño-Orgeira, José M.; Casans-Frances, Rubén; Casalderrey-Rivas, Marta; Romero-García, Eva; Marín-Zaldívar, Clara; Aroca-Tanarro, Ana; Alonso-Correa, Oscar; Rodríguez-Martín, Luis Jesús; Espinosa-Ramírez, Salvador; Hagberg, Carin A.]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[GUIDELINES]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Guidelines on strategies for the universal implementation of videolaryngoscopy]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/guidelines_on_strategies_for_the_universal.312.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00312.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>OBJECTIVE 

The Airway Section of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Latin American Federation of Emergency Medicine (FLAME) and an international group of airway experts (IAG) aimed to establish multidisciplinary recommendations advocating for the universal use of videolaryngoscopy (VL) in both emergency and planned care settings.

DESIGN 

A committee of experts from the two national scientific societies and an international group of airway experts was convened. Relevant research questions aligning with the document's objective were identified. A rapid systematic review of the evidence was performed, and the quality of evidence was assessed. Recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) The entire process was conducted independently of industry funding.

METHODS 

Six domains were defined pertaining to VL: Clinical Benefits; Infrastructure and Accessibility; Clinical Guidelines and Protocols; Teaching and Clinical Training; Dissemination and Promotion of Clinical Benefits; Innovation, Sustainability, and Research. For each domain, specific questions were developed using the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes). A literature search was conducted following PRISMA-R guidelines and analysed using the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS 

The synthesis process resulted in 12 recommendations. Due to the low quality of available evidence, most recommendations were formulated based on expert opinion.

CONCLUSION 

The experts achieved strong consensus, formulating 12 recommendations to support strategies aimed at universalising the use of videolaryngoscopy.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002210, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002210]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00312</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/continuous_noninvasive_blood_pressure_monitoring.311.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Flick, Moritz; Gebhardt, Leon; Bergholz, Alina; Thomsen, Kristen K.; Bossemeyer, Max; Hapfelmeier, Alexander; Auinger, Julia; Saugel, Bernd]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring with wearable photoplethysmography: A method comparison study in high-risk patients recovering from noncardiac surgery]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/continuous_noninvasive_blood_pressure_monitoring.311.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00311.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

The Biobeat wrist monitor (BB-613W; Biobeat Technologies, Petah-Tikva, Israel) and the Biobeat chest monitor (BB-613P; Biobeat Technologies) are wearable solutions for continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring.

OBJECTIVE(S) 

We aimed to investigate the blood pressure measurement performance of the Biobeat wrist monitor and chest monitor after external calibration.

DESIGN 

A prospective method comparison study.

SETTING 

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

PATIENTS 

Fifty high-risk patients recovering from noncardiac surgery in an advanced postanaesthesia care unit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

We compared blood pressure measurements from the Biobeat wrist monitor (BPWRIST-ART) and the Biobeat chest monitor (BPCHEST-ART) with intra-arterial blood pressure measurements (BPART). In addition, we aimed to compare blood pressure measurements from the Biobeat wrist monitor (BPWRIST-OSCI) with those from an oscillometric upper-arm cuff (BPOSCI). We used Bland–Altman analysis, four-quadrant plot and error grid analysis for statistical analysis.

RESULTS 

The mean of the differences ± standard deviation (95%-limits of agreement) between BPWRIST-ART and BPART was 3 ± 11 mmHg (-19 to 25 mmHg) for mean blood pressure with a concordance rate to track 15-min blood pressure changes of 51%. The mean of the differences between BPCHEST-ART and BPART was 3 ± 11 mmHg (-17 to 24 mmHg) for mean blood pressure with a concordance rate to track 15-min blood pressure changes of 61%. The mean of the differences between BPWRIST-OSCI and BPOSCI was 6 ± 11 mmHg (-16 to 27 mmHg) for mean blood pressure with a concordance rate to track 15-min blood pressure changes of 49%.

CONCLUSIONS 

Blood pressure measurements from the Biobeat wrist monitor and the Biobeat chest monitor did not show clinically acceptable agreement either with intra-arterial blood pressure measurements or with blood pressure measurements from an oscillometric upper-arm cuff in high-risk patients recovering from noncardiac surgery in an advanced postanaesthesia care unit.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002222, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002222]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00311</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/intraoperative_hypotension_during_robotic_assisted.310.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Antonella, Cotoia; Discenza, Antonello; Rauseo, Michela; Matella, Mario; Caggianelli, Girolamo; Ciaramelletti, Rossana; Mirabella, Lucia; Cinnella, Gilda]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Intraoperative hypotension during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised controlled trial comparing standard goal-directed fluid therapy with hypotension prediction index-guided goal-directed fluid therapy]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/intraoperative_hypotension_during_robotic_assisted.310.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00310.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) represents the leading application of robotic surgery in the treatment for prostate cancer with faster recovery and reduced invasiveness. Maintaining stable blood pressure during RARP is crucial to avoid complications. The approach used is goal-directed therapy (GDT); however, the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI), a machine learning algorithm that analyses arterial waveforms, may provide additional benefits.

OBJECTIVE 

To evaluate the cumulative amount, frequency and duration of intraoperative hypotension episodes in patients undergoing RARP, comparing those managed with a GDT protocol guided by the HPI algorithm versus those managed without it.

DESIGN 

Prospective randomised study.

SETTING 

Single-centre university hospital. Recruitment from January 2022 to April 2023.

PARTICIPANTS 

Eighty-two patients.

INTERVENTIONS 

Patients undergoing RARP were randomly assigned to either a GDT protocol alone (control) or a GDT protocol guided by the HPI (HPI group). All patients received both general anaesthesia and a single-shot spinal technique.

MEAN OUTCOME MEASURES 

Cumulative amount of intraoperative hypotension [measured using the time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 65 mmHg]; frequency of hypotensive events; duration of hypotensive events; postoperative complications; length of stay.

RESULTS 

No differences were observed in TWA-MAP, or in the frequency and duration of hypotensive events between the groups. Both groups maintained stable haemodynamics with minimal hypotension, and had similar fluid infusion and vasoconstrictor administration. Additionally, there were no differences in postoperative complications or length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS 

In our study, HPI guidance did not reduce intraoperative hypotension during RARP. Interestingly, the control group experienced fewer hypotensive events than typically reported in the literature, likely because of the high standards of haemodynamic and anaesthesiologic management maintained across both groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06535464.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002211, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002211]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00310</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/hypnotic_and_antinociceptive_contribution_of.308.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Beck, Florian; Bonhomme, Vincent L.; Hardy, Pierre-Yves; Kaba, Abdourahamane; Carella, Michele]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[SHORT SCIENTIFIC REPORT]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Hypnotic and antinociceptive contribution of magnesium sulphate during balanced total intravenous anaesthesia in total thyroidectomy: A randomised double-blind clinical trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/hypnotic_and_antinociceptive_contribution_of.308.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00308.T1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>No abstract available]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002216, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002216]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00308</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/regional_anaesthesia_related_complications_in.306.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Ganter, Michael Thomas; Girard, Thierry; Stadelmann, Vincent A.; Rehberg-Klug, Benno; Staender, Sven; Hofer, Christoph Karl]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Regional anaesthesia-related complications in Switzerland: Lessons learned from the national closed claims analysis over the past 30 years]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/regional_anaesthesia_related_complications_in.306.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00306.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

Regional anaesthesia is widely used in clinical practice, offering significant benefits but carrying risks such as nerve damage and other complications. Understanding medicolegal trends associated with regional anaesthesia is essential for improving patient safety and refining practices.

OBJECTIVE(S) 

To analyse closed claims related to regional anaesthesia in Switzerland over the past 30 years, identify trends in complications and assess their medicolegal implications.

DESIGN 

Retrospective analysis of the Swiss Anaesthesiology Closed Claims Analysis database, focusing on cases involving regional anaesthesia from 1992 to 2022.

SETTING 

The study was conducted using data from Swiss medical malpractice insurers and the Swiss Society of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine together with their Foundation for Patient Safety in Anaesthesia.

PATIENTS 

A total of 244 closed claims of patients were reviewed, of which 140 cases involved regional anaesthesia.

INTERVENTION(S) 

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

Key measures included patient demographics, type of anaesthesia, complications, adherence to best practices and legal outcomes such as liability acceptance and compensation amounts.

RESULTS 

The number of claims involving regional anaesthesia decreased significantly over three decades, from 69 (49%) in the first decade to 30 (21%) in the last. Nerve damage was the most common complication (76%), with a notable reduction in permanent injuries from 57 to 28%. Advances in ultrasound-guided techniques and improved documentation may have contributed to these trends. Male patients tended to have higher rates of nerve injuries, while female patients reported more nonspecific pain syndromes and posttraumatic stress disorders because of the health impairment associated with the liability case. Liability was accepted in 43% of cases, with compensation often exceeding CHF 100 000. The highest compensations seemed to have been paid to male patients.

CONCLUSIONS 

The decline in claims may reflect advancements in anaesthetic techniques and safety practices. This study underscores the importance of communication and training best practices in regional anaesthesia, including sufficient patient information and documentation to enhance patient safety and reduce medicolegal risks. Pain during performance, multiple attempts and re-injections should be avoided whenever possible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

No registration]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002220, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002220]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00306</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/differential_effects_of_propofol_anaesthesia.305.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Boncompte, Gonzalo; Cortínez, Luis I.; Toso, Alberto; Giordano, Ady; Cruzat, Francisco; Fuentes, Ricardo; Pedemonte, Juan C.; Contreras, Victor; Biggs, Daniela; Chiu, Esteban; Ibacache, Mauricio]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Differential effects of propofol anaesthesia across three amplitude-defined electroencephalographic states in sedated critically ill term neonates: An observational study]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9900/differential_effects_of_propofol_anaesthesia.305.aspx"><img src="https://images.journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/SmallThumb.00003643-990000000-00305.F1.jpeg" border="0" align ="left" alt="image"/></a>BACKGROUND 

The developing neonatal brain displays different electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to GABAergic anaesthetics than adults. Evidence suggests the importance of isoelectric-like activity patterns. However, markers of hypnotic depth are currently lacking for this population.

OBJECTIVE 

To explore potential EEG markers of propofol-induced hypnosis in sedated critically ill term neonates.

DESIGN 

Observational exploratory cohort study.

PATIENTS 

Twenty critically ill term neonates (postmenstrual age 37 to 44 weeks) undergoing intensive care and requiring anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery. Patients with perinatal asphyxia, neurological pathology, brain malformations and metabolic or haemodynamic instability were excluded.

INTERVENTION(S) 

Frontal EEG (Sedline) was recorded before induction and during a 20-min continuous rate propofol infusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

Depending on peak amplitude, segmented EEG signals (1 s epochs) were classified as either isoelectric (<10 μV), low-voltage 10 to 25 μV), or high-voltage (>25 μV). Propofol effects were evaluated in terms of time occupancy and spectral properties within these EEG states. Correlations between clinical variables and EEG states were explored.

RESULTS 

The EEGs of 17 neonates were analysed. Most showed periods of low-voltage (16/17, 94%) and isoelectric states (2/17, 70.5%) before anaesthesia. The time spent in these EEG states increased significantly during propofol infusion; 17/17 (100%), P < 0.001 and 16/17 (94.1%), P = 0.016, respectively. Propofol increased the mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] time spent in the isoelectric state per patient: 12.4 (3.3 to 21.5)% versus 28.6 (14.4 to 42.8)%, P < 0.002. A reduced spectral power was observed across all frequency bands during low-voltage states (all P < 0.026). Gestational age was negatively correlated with time in the isoelectric state; rho, 95% CI, −0.539 (−0.11 to −0.87), P = 0.031.

CONCLUSION 

Our results show that isoelectric periods are common before anaesthesia in our studied population and more frequent in patients born at earlier gestational ages. The data suggest that propofol anaesthesia increases isoelectric EEG states while also reducing the spectral power, specifically during low-voltage EEG states. Potentially, both of these EEG changes could be biomarkers of neonatal hypnosis depth in this particular critically ill subpopulation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04904965.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000002208, . doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002208]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-990000000-00305</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9000/opioid_sparing_effect_of_modified_intercostal.98287.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Cheng, Xin-qi; Zhang, Mao-yun; Fang, Qi; Shi, De-wen; Huang, Xiao-ci; Liu, Xue-sheng; Gu, Er-wei; Xu, Guang-hong]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: PDF Only]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Opioid-sparing effect of modified intercostal nerve block during single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy: Retraction: A randomised controlled trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9000/opioid_sparing_effect_of_modified_intercostal.98287.aspx"></a>BACKGROUND 

Peripheral local anaesthetic blockade has an important role in multimodal postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery. Intercostal nerve block has an opioid-sparing effect after thoracoscopic surgery, but there is little information about an intra-operative opioid-sparing effect.

OBJECTIVE 

This prospective randomised trial was designed to evaluate the feasibility of a modified intercostal nerve block and its potential opioid-sparing effect during single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy.

DESIGN 

This was a randomised controlled study.

SETTING 

The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China, from January 2020 to April 2020.

PATIENTS 

Fifty patients scheduled for single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy were enrolled.

INTERVENTION 

Patients were randomised to receive the intercostal nerve block using 10 ml 0.35% ropivacaine (group MINB) or conventional general anaesthesia (group CGA). Following a bolus of 0.5 to 1.0 μg kg−1 remifentanil, it was then infused at 0.2 to 0.5 μg kg−1 min−1 during surgery to keep mean arterial pressure or heart rate values around 20% below baseline values.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 

The primary outcome was intra-operative remifentanil consumption.

RESULTS 

Median [IQR] remifentanil consumption was reduced in the MINB group [0 μg (0 to 0 μg)] compared with the CGA group [1650.0 μg (870.0 to 1892.5 μg)]. The median difference was 1650.0 μg (95%CI 1200.0 to 1770.0 μg; P = 0.00). The total number of analgesic demands during the first 24 and 48 h in the MINB group was significantly less than in the CGA group (difference = 1; 95% CI 1 to 3; P = 0.00 and difference = 4; 95% CI 3 to 5; P = 0.00; respectively). The difference in time to first demand for analgesia was significant [difference = 728 min (95% CI 344 to 1381 min), P = 0.00] and also in the number of patients requiring additional tramadol (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION 

We have shown intra-operative opioid-sparing with a modified intercostal nerve block during single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy, with opioid-sparing extending 48 h after surgery. However, the opioid-sparing effect was not associated with a reduction in opioid side effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION 

http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2000029337.

Correspondence to Guang-hong Xu, Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, Anhui 230022, China Tel: +86 0551 62922344; fax: +86 0551 62923704; e-mail: xuguanghong2004@163.com

© 2022 European Society of Anaesthesiology]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():, September 2021. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001394]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-900000000-98287</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9000/acute_pain_after_serratus_anterior_plane_or.98374.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Qiu, Yuwei; Wu, Jingxiang; Huang, Qi; Lu, Yungang; Xu, Meiying; Yang, Dongsheng; Ince, Ilker; Sessler, Daniel I.]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[RETRACTION: PDF Only]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Acute pain after serratus anterior plane or thoracic paravertebral blocks for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomised trial]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9000/acute_pain_after_serratus_anterior_plane_or.98374.aspx"></a>BACKGROUND 

Serratus anterior and paravertebral blocks can both be used for video-assisted thoracic surgery. However, serratus anterior blocks are easier to perform, and possibly safer. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that serratus anterior plane blocks and thoracic paravertebral blocks provide comparable analgesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery. Secondarily, we tested the hypothesis that both blocks lengthen the time to onset of surgical pain and reduce the need for rescue tramadol.

METHODS 

Patients having video-assisted thoracic lobectomy or segmentectomy were randomly allocated to ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blocks, n = 30; ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane blocks, n = 30; or, general anaesthesia alone, n = 30. Visual analogue pain scores analogue pain scores at rest, during coughing and Prince-Henry pain scores were used to assess postoperative analgesia. Our primary analysis was noninferiority of serratus anterior blocks compared with paravertebral blocks.

RESULTS 

Baseline characteristics were comparable among the three groups. Two hours after surgery, the mean difference in visual analogue pain scores between the serratus anterior and paravertebral blocks was 0.0 (96.8% CI −0.4 to 0.3) cm at rest, −0.2 (−0.8 to 0.4) cm during coughing and -0.1(-0.5 to 0.3) for Prince-Henry pain scores. After 24 h, the mean difference was 0.0 (−0.7 to 0.8) cm at rest, 0.1 (−0.8 to 0.9) cm during coughing and 0.1(-0.4 to 0.6) for Prince-Henry pain scores. All differences were significantly noninferior. Time to onset of pain after surgery was 19 ± 5 (SD) hours with serratus anterior blocks, 16 ± 5 h with paravertebral blocks and 12 ± 5 h with general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia with either block was associated with significantly less intra-operative propofol and sufentanil, reduced postoperative rescue analgesia (tramadol) and less postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with general anaesthesia alone. Patients with serratus anterior block had a significantly lower incidence of intra-operative hypotension and requirement for intra-operative vasopressor (3.4%), compared with general anaesthesia alone. Serratus anterior block took less time to perform than paravertebral block (5.1 ± 1.1 min versus 10.1 ± 2.9 min).

CONCLUSION 

Serratus anterior plane blocks, which are easier and quicker than paravertebral blocks, provide comparable analgesia in patients having video-assisted thoracic surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY URL 

ChiCTR1800017671; http://www.chictr.org.cn/hvshowproject.aspx?id=13510.

Correspondence to Jingxiang Wu, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 Huaihai Rd. West, Shanghai, China 200030 Tel: +86 18930857186; e-mail: wu_jingxiang@sjtu.edu.cn

© 2022 European Society of Anaesthesiology]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():, September 2021. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001196]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-900000000-98374</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <link>https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9000/effects_of_premedication_with_clonidine_on.99596.aspx</link>
      <author><![CDATA[Cao, Jianping; Shi, Xueyin; Xu, Haitao; Jiang, Jingjing; Pu, Yabin; Miao, Xiaoyong]]></author>
      <category><![CDATA[Retracted: PDF Only]]></category>
      <title><![CDATA[Effects of premedication with clonidine on pre-operative anxiety and post-operative pain in children: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial: Retracted]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/fulltext/9000/effects_of_premedication_with_clonidine_on.99596.aspx"></a>No abstract available]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 GMT-05:00</pubDate>
      <citation><![CDATA[European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. ():, September 2021. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283408931]]></citation>
      <copyright><![CDATA[(C)2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.]]></copyright>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00003643-900000000-99596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>


