<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 05:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Computer Forensics</category><category>Child Porn</category><category>Cell phone forensics</category><category>Criminal Defense</category><category>Casey Anthony</category><category>Forensic Science</category><category>Law</category><category>Limewire</category><category>Computer Forensics Expert</category><category>Computer Forensics Experts</category><category>Digital Forensics</category><category>Expert Witness</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Myspace</category><category>e-discovery</category><category>Bogus Computer Forensics Expert</category><category>Child Pornography</category><category>Computer Foreniscs</category><category>Internet</category><category>Internet predators</category><category>Internet safety</category><category>PI Licensing</category><category>Security</category><category>Training</category><category>computer forensics license</category><category>Certification</category><category>Computer Forensic Jobs</category><category>Computer Repair</category><category>Computer security</category><category>Court Testimony</category><category>Ethics</category><category>Expert Testimony</category><category>Hard disk drive</category><category>Internet Predator</category><category>Kazaa</category><category>Mobile phone</category><category>Murder</category><category>Search Warrant</category><category>cell phones</category><category>4th Amendment</category><category>Anti-Forensics</category><category>Apprenticeship</category><category>Blog Talk Radio</category><category>Browser Caching</category><category>Business</category><category>Buyer Beware</category><category>Call Detail Records</category><category>Careers in Computer Forensics</category><category>Children</category><category>Chloroform</category><category>Chloroform Hits</category><category>Computer Forensic Testimony</category><category>Computer Forensics Art and Science</category><category>Computer Forensics Career</category><category>Computer Forensics Certifications</category><category>Computer Forensics Training.</category><category>Computer Support</category><category>Corporate IT</category><category>Crime Scene</category><category>Defeating Computer Forensics</category><category>Defense Attorney</category><category>Digital Forensics Practice</category><category>Digital Forensics Science</category><category>Digital Triage</category><category>Encryption</category><category>Ethics in Computer Forensics</category><category>Everquest</category><category>Evidence</category><category>Expert Bias</category><category>Expert Systems</category><category>Expert Witnesses</category><category>Expert system</category><category>Filesharing</category><category>Forensic4Cast</category><category>Frank Bender</category><category>Google</category><category>Incident Response</category><category>Internet Cache</category><category>Internet Caching</category><category>Law Enforcement</category><category>Lee Whitfield</category><category>Legislation</category><category>Metadata</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>National Institute of Justice</category><category>Network Packet Forensics</category><category>Operating system</category><category>Operation Fairplay</category><category>P2P</category><category>P2P File Sharing</category><category>Privacy</category><category>Private Investigator Licensing</category><category>Professional certification</category><category>Rob Lee</category><category>SANS</category><category>SANS Institute</category><category>SANS Summit 2009</category><category>Sex Crimes</category><category>Social Networking</category><category>Solicitation</category><category>Supreme Court</category><category>Syngress</category><category>Trojan Horse Defense</category><category>United States</category><category>Wi-Fi</category><category>Wireless</category><category>Wireless router</category><category>Yahoo mail</category><category>cell phone features</category><category>cell phones and crime</category><category>child porn arrest</category><category>north carolina</category><category>phishing</category><category>Adnan Syed</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>American Academy of Forensic Sciences</category><category>Andy Spruill</category><category>Antivirus</category><category>Art and Science of</category><category>Article Suggestions</category><category>Association of Certified E-Discovery Professionals</category><category>Attorneys</category><category>Austrailia</category><category>Autopsy</category><category>BN.com</category><category>Back Tracking Emails</category><category>Backup</category><category>Blogging Topics</category><category>Blythe v. Bell</category><category>Books</category><category>Bradley</category><category>Browser hijacking</category><category>C. Mambretti</category><category>CDFS</category><category>CEIC 2010</category><category>CacheBack</category><category>Call Times</category><category>Capital Defense</category><category>Cell Phone Safety</category><category>Cell Tower Dump</category><category>Cell Tower Tracking</category><category>Cellular Analysis</category><category>Challenging Computer Evidence</category><category>Challenging computer forensics evidence</category><category>Child Porn Trap</category><category>Civil vs Criminal</category><category>Cloud Computing</category><category>Cloud Storage</category><category>Commercial Services</category><category>CompTIA</category><category>Companies</category><category>Computer Forensics Jobs</category><category>Computer Forensics Show</category><category>Computer Forensics Testimony</category><category>Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor</category><category>Computer Repair Expectation of Privacy</category><category>Computer Time</category><category>ComputerCop</category><category>Confidential nature of computer forensics</category><category>Contraband</category><category>Council of Digital Forensic Specialists</category><category>Court</category><category>Court Presentations</category><category>Crime</category><category>Crime and Justice</category><category>Cyber Patrol</category><category>CyberSecurity</category><category>Cyberbullying</category><category>Cybercime Cases.</category><category>Cyberspace</category><category>DNA</category><category>DOJ</category><category>Data</category><category>Data Leakage</category><category>Data Loss Prevention</category><category>Data logging</category><category>Data recovery</category><category>Daubert</category><category>Defendant</category><category>Denial-of-service attack</category><category>Digital Forensic Awards</category><category>Digital Forensics Profession</category><category>Digital camera</category><category>Distracted Driving</category><category>Do No harm</category><category>Drive Prophet</category><category>Drive letter assignment</category><category>E-mail address</category><category>EXIF Data</category><category>Education</category><category>Electronic Communications Act. File Sharing</category><category>Electronic discovery</category><category>Email Scams</category><category>Employment</category><category>Entrapment</category><category>Entwistle</category><category>Examiner Qualifications</category><category>Expert</category><category>FBI</category><category>Fair Trial Initiative</category><category>Fake  Hyperlinks</category><category>Fake Computer Forensics Examiners</category><category>Federal Bureau of Investigation</category><category>File Management</category><category>File Transfer Protocol</category><category>File format</category><category>File manager</category><category>First responder</category><category>Folder (computing)</category><category>Forensic Magazine</category><category>Forensic Sculpting</category><category>Forensic Toolkit</category><category>Forensic Video Analysis</category><category>Forensic facial reconstruction</category><category>Forensics</category><category>Forensics Blogs</category><category>Forensics Magazine</category><category>Forum</category><category>Free Speech</category><category>Freedom of speech</category><category>Frye</category><category>Fun with IT</category><category>GPS</category><category>GPS Ankle Bracelet</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>Geolocation</category><category>Global Positioning System</category><category>Gmail</category><category>Gnutella</category><category>Google Searches</category><category>Google Street View</category><category>Guidance Software</category><category>Hacking</category><category>Haiti</category><category>Harlan Carvey</category><category>Health care</category><category>Helix</category><category>Help Haiti Scams</category><category>Hobby</category><category>Hotmail</category><category>IP address</category><category>IPad</category><category>Identity Theft</category><category>Incident Management</category><category>Information technology</category><category>Innocence Project</category><category>Internet Protocol</category><category>Internet Sting</category><category>Intrusion Detection Systems</category><category>Intuit</category><category>JPEG</category><category>Jerry Grant</category><category>Jim Hoerricks</category><category>Jodi Arias</category><category>Jose Baez</category><category>Joseph Finder</category><category>Jule Amero</category><category>Juries</category><category>Jury</category><category>Justice System</category><category>Justin Brown</category><category>Kirk Osborne</category><category>Knowledge</category><category>Larry Daniel</category><category>Larry Daniel Interview</category><category>Law Enforcement Only</category><category>Law Firms</category><category>Learning</category><category>Live Forensics</category><category>Live Linux CDs</category><category>Logs</category><category>Lynita Hinsch</category><category>MAC Times</category><category>MD5</category><category>MMORPG</category><category>MMORPG Forensics</category><category>MP3 Player</category><category>Malicious Software</category><category>Malware</category><category>Mark McKinnon</category><category>Massive Multiplayer Online</category><category>Matt Shannon</category><category>McCain</category><category>Medicine</category><category>Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts</category><category>Microsoft Access</category><category>Microsoft Windows</category><category>Microsoft Word</category><category>Misconduct</category><category>Missed Computer Forensics Evidence</category><category>Missing Child</category><category>Missing Teens</category><category>Muscle memory</category><category>NAMUS</category><category>NC Jury View</category><category>Nancy Grace</category><category>National Academy of Sciences</category><category>National Security</category><category>Net Nanny</category><category>NetAnalysis</category><category>NetSentry</category><category>OSI model</category><category>Obama</category><category>On-line game forensics</category><category>Open source</category><category>Opposing expert</category><category>Organizations</category><category>Paranoia</category><category>Personal Injury</category><category>Photoshop Forensics</category><category>Plain View</category><category>Plain View Doctrine</category><category>Plea Bargain</category><category>Podcast</category><category>Pokémon Go</category><category>Police</category><category>Pop-ups</category><category>Postcard Mysteries</category><category>Presidential Debate</category><category>Presumed Guilty</category><category>Privacy law</category><category>Prosecution</category><category>Radio Show</category><category>Recording Industry Association of America</category><category>Recycle Bin</category><category>Rick Rolled</category><category>Road rage</category><category>Rogue software</category><category>Roleplaying</category><category>Router</category><category>Rulings</category><category>SHA hash functions</category><category>SIMPLE</category><category>SONY DATA BREACH</category><category>Scammers</category><category>Scams</category><category>Scotland Yard</category><category>Search Engines</category><category>Searching</category><category>Second Life</category><category>Serial</category><category>Serial Podcast</category><category>Sexting</category><category>Sims Online</category><category>Social Responsibilty</category><category>Social network</category><category>South Africa</category><category>South African Revenue Service</category><category>Spam</category><category>Spyware</category><category>Spyware and Adware</category><category>Standardized test</category><category>Stenger</category><category>Steve Burgess</category><category>Stored cell phone locations</category><category>Street View</category><category>Surveillance</category><category>Syed</category><category>TOR</category><category>Talk Forensics Radio</category><category>Talk Show</category><category>Talk radio</category><category>Tax Scams</category><category>Tax refund</category><category>Technical Articles</category><category>Text Times</category><category>The Inside Story</category><category>The Juror Investigates</category><category>Toyota Camry</category><category>Trial Consulting</category><category>TweetDeck</category><category>Twitter</category><category>Typed URLs</category><category>TypedURLs</category><category>UK Police</category><category>Uniform Resource Locator</category><category>United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</category><category>University of Washington</category><category>Unverified Sender</category><category>Urban Sex Trafficking</category><category>Used Computers</category><category>Used Laptops</category><category>Verdict</category><category>Versa Check</category><category>Virtual Reality</category><category>Viruses</category><category>Voom Technologies</category><category>Windows</category><category>Windows Forensic Analysis</category><category>Windows Registry</category><category>Windows XP</category><category>Wireless network</category><category>Word of Warcraft</category><category>World Wide Web</category><category>World of Warcraft</category><category>bbb.org</category><category>camera phones</category><category>cell phone tracking</category><category>cell phone triangulation</category><category>cell towers</category><category>chat rooms</category><category>computer expert vs. forensic expert</category><category>computer forensic defense experts</category><category>consent to search</category><category>courtroom presentations</category><category>credit card fraud</category><category>deleted data</category><category>deleted text messages</category><category>digtial forensics</category><category>discovery</category><category>discovery issues</category><category>expertise</category><category>experts</category><category>hayes command set</category><category>information superhighway</category><category>interview</category><category>kids arrested</category><category>north carolina.  computer forensics license</category><category>police stop</category><category>position paper</category><category>post-mortem computer forensics</category><category>primary expert</category><category>probable cause</category><category>secrets</category><category>stingray</category><category>texting</category><category>wral-tv</category><category>write blocker</category><title>Ex Forensis</title><description></description><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>193</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-1737724869649158134</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2016-08-03T12:45:01.533-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cell phone forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Digital Forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Distracted Driving</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pokémon Go</category><title>Pokemon Go: The Perfect Storm of Novelty and Nostalgia</title><atom:summary type="text">Have you noticed more people than normal exhibiting traits of the aptly named &quot;text neck&quot;? It sure seems like I have.  Well, statistics would seem to verify our observations.  Pokemon, created by Satoshi Tajiri in 1995, is one of the most successful franchises in history, and is still breaking new ground twenty years after its inception. What we have is the perfect storm of novelty and nostalgia.</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2016/08/pokemon-go-perfect-storm-of-novelty-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-FOYR6wGjYsc/V6IVutOK_kI/AAAAAAAAAAQ/-ILtIu0qYjwxnugID4FwYAz2lhPdou98QCK4B/s72-c/Pokemon%2BGo%2BDriving.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-5845233471426258934</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2016-07-05T11:04:42.935-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Adnan Syed</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Call Detail Records</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Jerry Grant</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justin Brown</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serial</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serial Podcast</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Syed</category><title>Adnan Syed Gets New Trial - The Serial Podcast</title><atom:summary type="text">After several months since the hearing regarding two key elements from the first trial where Adnan Syed was convicted of killing his high school girlfriend, he has been given a new chance at freedom.

In an opinion handed down a couple of days ago, the Judge in the case granted Mr. Syed a new trial based on the AT&amp;T call detail evidence.

The original records used by the prosecution in the trial </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2016/07/adnan-syed-gets-new-trial-serial-podcast.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-5817009687850977796</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-11-17T12:29:33.834-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cell phone tracking</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cell phone triangulation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cell towers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">stingray</category><title>Cell Phone Tracking via Call Detail Records</title><atom:summary type="text">
We live in a world today where individuals’ movements and locations are being recorded in many different ways.  These movements and locations are commonly being used as evidence in civil, criminal and domestic litigation.  It is of paramount importance that anyone who is involved in litigation that uses cellular location evidence understands the appropriate and inappropriate use of this type of </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2014/11/cell-phone-tracking-via-call-detail.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-3329654334752417826</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-11-13T08:25:14.882-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Evidence</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Jodi Arias</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Misconduct</category><title>Jodi Arias - Computer Evidence Destroyed by the Police?</title><atom:summary type="text">
The defense in the Jodi Arias case has raised a significant issue of evidence tampering by the police in this case.  The motion alleges that evidence was purposely deleted from the victim&#39;s computer while it was in the custody of the police.

You can read the full article here.


</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2014/11/jodi-arias-computer-evidence-destroyed.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-8902687500991726760</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-08-27T13:13:51.409-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Child Porn</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CyberSecurity</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">TOR</category><title>Are you really anonymous on the TOR network?  Federal Cybersecurity Director Found Guilty on Child Porn Charges</title><atom:summary type="text">Federal Cybersecurity Director Found Guilty on Child Porn Charges

BY KIM ZETTER WIRED MAGAINZE.

&quot;Tor is free software that lets users surf the web anonymously. Using the Tor browser, the traffic of users is encrypted and bounced through a network of computers hosted by volunteers around the world before it arrives at its destination, thus masking the IP address from which the visitor originates</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2014/08/are-you-really-anonymous-on-tor-network.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-2103559379886205408</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-02-07T14:11:32.184-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics Expert</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics Experts</category><title>Computer investigator pleads guilty to misrepresenting credentials </title><atom:summary type="text">http://www.concordmonitor.com/home/10505029-95/computer-investigator-pleads-guilty-to-misrepresenting-credentials

&quot; A Rye private investigator who has received $23,000 from the state since 2006 to do computer forensic investigations for indigent defendants pleaded guilty last week to misrepresenting some of her investigative certifications on her company’s website. 

Judith Gosselin, owner and </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2014/02/computer-investigator-pleads-guilty-to.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-5983757678408813628</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-11-06T09:56:52.533-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">police stop</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">probable cause</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Search Warrant</category><title>Anal probes?  A new kind of abduction scenario that started with clinched butt cheeks.</title><atom:summary type="text">Forget about aliens and UFOs.  Instead of watching the sky, apparently we need to be watching the police.

&quot;The incident began January 2, 2013 after David Eckert finished shopping at the Wal-Mart in Deming.  According to a federal lawsuit, Eckert didn&#39;t make a complete stop at a stop sign coming out of the parking lot and was immediately stopped by law enforcement.     
 Eckert&#39;s attorney, </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2013/11/anal-probes-new-kind-of-abduction.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-4448470336857349022</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-10-28T14:30:08.591-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cell phones and crime</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GPS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GPS Ankle Bracelet</category><title>Is Your GPS Bracelet Listening?</title><atom:summary type="text">Here is an article from The Crime Report about some GPS bracelets that have a cellular telephone capability built into the bracelet.

The implications are interesting, to say the least.

Caution: Your GPS Ankle Bracelet Is Listening


Thanks to Sarah R. Olson at the NC Indigent Services for sharing this link with me.</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2013/10/is-your-gps-bracelet-listening.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-5081041150216986949</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-10-22T13:55:25.648-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics Jobs</category><title>Computer Forensics Job Opening</title><atom:summary type="text">The Baltimore Police Department has an opening for a Computer Forensics examiner.

The link to the post is here:

Computer Forensic Examiner Opening



Job Title:Computer Forensic Examiner I     
Closing Date/Time:Fri. 11/08/13 4:30 PM Eastern Time      
Salary:$25.07 - $31.23 Hourly
$45,630.00 - $56,836.00 Annually 
Job Type:MERIT
Location:Towson, Maryland 

</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2013/10/computer-forensics-job-opening.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-3154407589512071609</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-08-29T12:19:23.528-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cell Tower Dump</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cell Tower Tracking</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cellular Analysis</category><title>Cell Tower Dumps</title><atom:summary type="text">Cell Tower Dumps are used in cases where the FBI or local law enforcement is attempting to determine a cell phone number or numbers that can be used to investigate a crime.

I have seen cell tower dumps in several cases I have handled.  Here is an excellent article about this investigative technique from Ars Technica.

It is well worth the read.

How “cell tower dumps” caught the High Country </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2013/08/cell-tower-dumps.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-1640773956005593817</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-07-02T11:52:57.126-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">4th Amendment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">National Security</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Surveillance</category><title>Secret Court declassifies Yahoo&#39;s fight against revealing information to the government.</title><atom:summary type="text">This is an interesting story, especially in light of the current debate on government surveillance.


http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/28/secret-court-declassifies-yahoos-role-in-disclosure-fight/?_r=0</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2013/07/secret-court-declassifies-yahoos-fight.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-5764499753292706719</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-12-14T09:15:10.604-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Association of Certified E-Discovery Professionals</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Blythe v. Bell</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">computer expert vs. forensic expert</category><title>The Perils of Using the Local Computer Shop for Computer Forensics</title><atom:summary type="text">In a recent article posted by the Association of Certified E-Discovery Professionals, Robert Hilson writes about the loss of priveledge documents due to the Attorneys&#39; &quot;absent&quot; supervision.

&quot;It is a familiar story. A client discloses 
thousands of privileged documents from an electronic universe of many millions 
due to alleged failures to supervise a computer consultant. The mistaken 
</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-perils-of-using-local-computer-shop.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-5354875305698038968</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-11-27T08:11:18.477-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Google Searches</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Missed Computer Forensics Evidence</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Nancy Grace</category><title>Casey Anthony - Detectives Miss Google Searches</title><atom:summary type="text">Apparently, this is the case that will never be resolved, in spite of the fact that the case has been tried and the defendant acquitted.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57554167-504083/casey-anthony-update-jose-baez-former-anthony-attorney-told-crimesider-about-buried-computer-searches/

When I located these searches on the computer in January of 2009, I brought them to Jose&#39;s attention </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/11/casey-anthony-google-searches.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-6279088884183659611</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-08-15T01:40:51.044-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Call Detail Records</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Call Times</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Time</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">EXIF Data</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MAC Times</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Metadata</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Text Times</category><title>A Brief History of Time : Forensic Time</title><atom:summary type="text">

Time.  It is so embedded in our lives that we cannot even think without thinking of it as it forms the context within which we live.  And it would be fun to ramble on about time, from Einstein&#39;s concept of Space-Time to the neurologists&#39; discovery that time is &quot;perceived&quot; to even the current thinking that time, if it had a beginning, must have an end, which drives the physics people a little </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/08/a-brief-history-of-time-forensic-time.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-koIVw7rSD9s/UCs2NYRNyoI/AAAAAAAAAeI/ZqIfpg0RT5g/s72-c/7122719021.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-119629502615413473</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-08-09T11:19:51.974-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CDFS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Court Testimony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">digtial forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">expertise</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">experts</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Training</category><title>Experts and Expertise</title><atom:summary type="text">Cindy Murphy wrote an excellent blog post over at the CDFS (Consortium for Digital Forensics Specialists) blog titled, &quot;Experts and Expertise&quot; on the subject of experts and expertise.  She related her recent experience in a trial of a woman for Homicide by Negligent Usage of a Motor Vehicle.


One of the key points that stood out for me was her comment about the defense expert&#39;s testimony in </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/08/experts-and-expertise.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-362376985526252461</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-16T07:49:15.895-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Jose Baez</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Presumed Guilty</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The Inside Story</category><title>A Quality Expert Makes a Huge Difference</title><atom:summary type="text">I went to the local bookstore this weekend and picked up the new book by
Jose Baez, &quot;Presumed Guilty : Casey Anthony: The inside Story.&quot;

 Baez mentions in his book on page 370 how much of an impact having a quality
digital forensics expert makes on a case.  As an expert, I may be biased
toward that opinion as well, but I know that the work that our examiners do on
a day to day basis, whether in </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/07/quality-expert-makes-huge-difference.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lars Daniel, EnCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-E2USZC3gego/UAIenD1lUuI/AAAAAAAAAFY/wOfMQCgImPs/s72-c/Jose-Baez-Presumed-Guilty-Casey-Anthony-The-Inside-Story-727x1024.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-6973087356233169776</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-15T18:20:30.221-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensic Jobs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics Career</category><title>Employment Opportunity with Guardian Digital Forensics</title><atom:summary type="text">We are currently seeking applicants for either a Digital Forensics Examiner or Digital Forensics Technician position.

Our requirements:

Digital Forensics Examiner:

EnCE, DFCP, ACE, IACIS or other forensic certification, or the ability to complete and pass the EnCE or DFCP within one year.  We prefer testimony experience as well as case experience.  Must be willing and able to handle cases </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/03/employment-opportunity-with-guardian.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-1685851432387608495</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-29T09:01:30.613-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">bbb.org</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Intuit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Scams</category><title>New Spam Campaign - Spoofing Intuit</title><atom:summary type="text">I got a couple of spam emails this morning supposedly from Intuit about a software order.  The fake email they constructed looked very good.

However, note the sending address: alerts@bbb.org.

Also, if you click on the links in the email, they DO NOT go to Intuit.  For the ones I received, the links were different although the email looked exactly the same.

As always, be very careful about </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/02/new-spam-campaign-spoofing-intuit.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u528QvXp1bg/T04viRIhRgI/AAAAAAAAAdU/2eQrvCTAPaA/s72-c/Capture.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-4550682890707179655</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-09T18:18:51.636-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Email Scams</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Scammers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tax Scams</category><title>It&#39;s Tax Time and the Scams Begin</title><atom:summary type="text">I noticed that I am getting a rash of emails trapped in my spam filter at AppRiver. (They are a third party spam filtering and store and forward service.  I highly recommend them:  www.appriver.com)

Here is a screenie of one of them, claiming to be an email from Intuit, the makers of Quickbooks and Turbo Tax.



Fake email claiming to be from Intuit, Inc.









Not surprisingly, if you click </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/02/its-tax-time-and-scams-begin.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JbOnCzfwBVY/TzRQQY-VcdI/AAAAAAAAAdI/VcIe8wAFQ-4/s72-c/TaxScams.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-7780478749012135476</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-03T11:11:51.120-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cloud Computing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cloud Storage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">e-discovery</category><title>Cloud Data and E-Discovery - Pay your bill or risk sanctions.</title><atom:summary type="text">&quot;Plaintiff Sanctioned for Negligence after Third Party Vendor Destroys ESI&quot; from e-Discovery Case Law Update

&quot;In Cyntegra, Inc. v. Idexx Laboratories, Inc. [pdf], CV 06-4170 (C.D. Cal. 2006), U.S. District Court Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, granted the defendant’s motion for an adverse inference instruction as a sanction holding that the plaintiff was negligent and failed its affirmative duty to </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/02/cloud-data-and-e-discovery-pay-your.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-3434851671494127469</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-21T09:32:12.310-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bradley</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CacheBack</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chloroform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chloroform Hits</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">NetAnalysis</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stenger</category><title>Casey  Anthony - More on the chloroform evidence</title><atom:summary type="text">
I was reading the comments by readers of the story that appeared in the NY Times on July 18, 2011 regarding the chloroform searches in the Casey Anthony case.


Software Designer Reports Error in Anthony Trial

Several people commented that they didn&#39;t understand why John Bradley didn&#39;t notify the defense team or the media of the discrepancy in the 84 searches for chloroform in the Casey Anthony</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/casey-anthony-more-on-chloroform.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-1427950722718383864</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-12T09:00:58.222-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chloroform Hits</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics Testimony</category><title>John Bradley Responds to Chloroform Search Discrepency in Casey Anthony Trial</title><atom:summary type="text">John Bradley who testified about the chlorofrm search hits at the Casey Anthony trial responds to the questions about his testimony.

This is well worth reading if you want to get the inside scoop on what occurred regarding the Internet History in the Casey Anthony case regarding the chloroform searches, according to Mr. Bradley.

The link to John&#39;s response is below: 

http://www.cacheback.ca/</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/john-bradley-responds-to-chloroform.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-7790249451825373715</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-11T21:57:00.546-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chloroform</category><title>Casey Anthony Digital Evidence - Chloroform Searches</title><atom:summary type="text">Digital Detective posted an excellent analysis of the MORK file that was part of the Casey Anthony trial evidence related to the computer searches, particularly for chloroform.

Here is a link to the post. Digital Evidence Discrepencies - Casey Anthony Case  it is highly technical, but I would expect no less from the people who make NetAnalysis, a forensic tool I have used for several years now.</atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/casey-anthony-digital-evidence.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-7389283693461643463</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-08T01:29:27.883-04:00</atom:updated><title>A Digital Forensics Innocence Project</title><atom:summary type="text">Image via WikipediaJoe Windish posted an article on the need for a computer forensics innocence project. For A Computer Forensics Innocence Project over at the TheModerate Voice.  What he advocates makes a lot of sense. &quot;What we need is a Computers Forensics version of the Innocence Project.
 We need experts who believe in the presumption of innocence and are 
willing to spend the time it takes </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/digital-forensics-innocence-project.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-8818829620204195475</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-05T17:20:16.590-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice System</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Verdict</category><title>Casey Anthony Verdict</title><atom:summary type="text">Having spent two and a half years as a consulting expert in computer forensics and cell tower forensics on the Casey Anthony defense team, I have to say that Jose Baez was a pleasure to work with and did an herculean job in defending Casey Anthony.  Somehow he managed to juggle thousands of facts, dozens of experts and witnesses while under the intense scrutiny of the media and general public, </atom:summary><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/casey-anthony-verdict.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>