<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:24:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Windows XP</category><category>Fair Trial Initiative</category><category>Live Linux CDs</category><category>Used Laptops</category><category>Massive Multiplayer Online</category><category>National Institute of Justice</category><category>credit card fraud</category><category>Organizations</category><category>Cybercime Cases.</category><category>Data logging</category><category>information superhighway</category><category>Open source</category><category>Unverified Sender</category><category>discovery issues</category><category>Computer Forensics Art and Science</category><category>Attorneys</category><category>post-mortem computer forensics</category><category>Defeating Computer Forensics</category><category>Article Suggestions</category><category>Word of Warcraft</category><category>Professional certification</category><category>Daubert</category><category>C. Mambretti</category><category>DNA</category><category>Search Engines</category><category>Photoshop Forensics</category><category>JPEG</category><category>Opposing expert</category><category>Forensics Blogs</category><category>Casey Anthony</category><category>Employment</category><category>Limewire</category><category>MP3 Player</category><category>United States</category><category>Blog Talk Radio</category><category>Expert system</category><category>Ethics in Computer Forensics</category><category>Technical Articles</category><category>interview</category><category>Digital Forensics Practice</category><category>Windows Forensic Analysis</category><category>Plea Bargain</category><category>Free Speech</category><category>Forensic Science</category><category>TypedURLs</category><category>Careers in Computer Forensics</category><category>Expert</category><category>American Academy of Forensic Sciences</category><category>Entwistle</category><category>Recycle Bin</category><category>Rick Rolled</category><category>Internet Caching</category><category>Uniform Resource Locator</category><category>Viruses</category><category>Contraband</category><category>Jule Amero</category><category>Computer security</category><category>TweetDeck</category><category>Austrailia</category><category>deleted data</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Operation Fairplay</category><category>Scotland Yard</category><category>SANS Institute</category><category>CompTIA</category><category>Solicitation</category><category>Forensics</category><category>Global Positioning System</category><category>ComputerCop</category><category>Spyware and Adware</category><category>Criminal Defense</category><category>IP address</category><category>Router</category><category>Forensic4Cast</category><category>Obama</category><category>Computer Forensic Jobs</category><category>Child Porn</category><category>Social Networking</category><category>Roleplaying</category><category>E-mail address</category><category>Autopsy</category><category>Certification</category><category>Data Loss Prevention</category><category>write blocker</category><category>Network monitoring</category><category>Law Enforcement</category><category>Justice System</category><category>Missing Teens</category><category>Stenger</category><category>Andy Spruill</category><category>Business</category><category>Frye</category><category>Fake  Hyperlinks</category><category>phishing</category><category>Children</category><category>Commercial Services</category><category>Crime and Justice</category><category>P2P</category><category>Companies</category><category>Legislation</category><category>Computer Forensics Experts</category><category>Yahoo mail</category><category>SONY DATA BREACH</category><category>Everquest</category><category>Crime</category><category>File format</category><category>Corporate IT</category><category>Freedom of speech</category><category>computer forensics license</category><category>Privacy</category><category>Law Enforcement Only</category><category>Ethics</category><category>Capital Defense</category><category>Packet (information technology)</category><category>PI Licensing</category><category>Rulings</category><category>Child Pornography</category><category>Digital Triage</category><category>Chloroform</category><category>Steve Burgess</category><category>File Transfer Protocol</category><category>Tax refund</category><category>SANS</category><category>camera phones</category><category>Computer Forensics Certifications</category><category>Court Presentations</category><category>Internet predators</category><category>chat rooms</category><category>Operating system</category><category>Cyber Patrol</category><category>Learning</category><category>Murder</category><category>Scams</category><category>Child Porn Trap</category><category>Matt Shannon</category><category>wral-tv</category><category>Hacking</category><category>NetAnalysis</category><category>Intrusion Detection Systems</category><category>Education</category><category>Wireless</category><category>Twitter</category><category>McCain</category><category>north carolina.  computer forensics license</category><category>Wireless router</category><category>Computer Forensics Expert</category><category>Email Scams</category><category>Hotmail</category><category>Helix</category><category>Examiner Qualifications</category><category>Cyberspace</category><category>Plain View Doctrine</category><category>Forum</category><category>Browser Caching</category><category>4th Amendment</category><category>National Academy of Sciences</category><category>Computer Forensics Show</category><category>Medicine</category><category>Electronic Communications Act. File Sharing</category><category>Kazaa</category><category>Federal Bureau of Investigation</category><category>Forensic Sculpting</category><category>Scammers</category><category>First responder</category><category>Gnutella</category><category>Internet</category><category>bbb.org</category><category>Network Packet Forensics</category><category>The Juror Investigates</category><category>Internet Protocol</category><category>Toyota Camry</category><category>Talk Forensics Radio</category><category>Sexting</category><category>Urban Sex Trafficking</category><category>Evidence</category><category>Knowledge</category><category>Malware</category><category>cell phones and crime</category><category>primary expert</category><category>Digital Forensics Science</category><category>Microsoft Access</category><category>Mobile phone</category><category>Browser hijacking</category><category>Anti-Forensics</category><category>Joseph Finder</category><category>e-discovery</category><category>Social network</category><category>Verdict</category><category>Voom Technologies</category><category>Internet safety</category><category>Cyberbullying</category><category>Pop-ups</category><category>Digital camera</category><category>Typed URLs</category><category>Books</category><category>Fake Computer Forensics Examiners</category><category>Lynita Hinsch</category><category>Windows</category><category>Talk radio</category><category>courtroom presentations</category><category>Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts</category><category>CacheBack</category><category>cell phones</category><category>Backup</category><category>Identity Theft</category><category>kids arrested</category><category>Versa Check</category><category>Expert Systems</category><category>NetSentry</category><category>Police</category><category>Tax Scams</category><category>Drive letter assignment</category><category>secrets</category><category>Search Warrant</category><category>University of Washington</category><category>Bogus Computer Forensics Expert</category><category>FBI</category><category>Help Haiti Scams</category><category>Art and Science of</category><category>Net Nanny</category><category>Street View</category><category>MMORPG Forensics</category><category>Lee Whitfield</category><category>UK Police</category><category>Forensic facial reconstruction</category><category>Buyer Beware</category><category>Private Investigator Licensing</category><category>NC Jury View</category><category>Presidential Debate</category><category>texting</category><category>File Management</category><category>P2P File Sharing</category><category>Challenging Computer Evidence</category><category>Expert Witnesses</category><category>Crime Scene</category><category>Cell phone forensics</category><category>Standardized test</category><category>Podcast</category><category>Prosecution</category><category>World of Warcraft</category><category>Larry Daniel Interview</category><category>Sims Online</category><category>Blogging Topics</category><category>IPad</category><category>Digital Forensic Awards</category><category>Computer Forensic Testimony</category><category>Encryption</category><category>Civil vs Criminal</category><category>Spyware</category><category>Apprenticeship</category><category>Law Firms</category><category>CEIC 2010</category><category>Court</category><category>Logs</category><category>Mark McKinnon</category><category>SANS Summit 2009</category><category>Law</category><category>Spam</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Live Forensics</category><category>Chloroform Hits</category><category>Defendant</category><category>Recording Industry Association of America</category><category>Internet Cache</category><category>Metadata</category><category>Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor</category><category>Wi-Fi</category><category>Windows Registry</category><category>Confidential nature of computer forensics</category><category>Cloud Computing</category><category>Computer Support</category><category>Road rage</category><category>Trial Consulting</category><category>Electronic discovery</category><category>Computer Forensics Testimony</category><category>Trojan Horse Defense</category><category>Google</category><category>Denial-of-service attack</category><category>Expert Witness</category><category>Microsoft Windows</category><category>Social Responsibilty</category><category>Defense Attorney</category><category>SHA hash functions</category><category>Back Tracking Emails</category><category>Missing Child</category><category>Court Testimony</category><category>Entrapment</category><category>ICE</category><category>Harlan Carvey</category><category>OSI model</category><category>Cloud Storage</category><category>cell phone features</category><category>Privacy law</category><category>Data Leakage</category><category>Guidance Software</category><category>Stored cell phone locations</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>Cell Phone Safety</category><category>deleted text messages</category><category>Folder (computing)</category><category>Digital Forensics</category><category>Searching</category><category>Incident Management</category><category>Computer Forensics Training.</category><category>South African Revenue Service</category><category>Fun with IT</category><category>Kirk Osborne</category><category>Malicious Software</category><category>Data recovery</category><category>computer forensic defense experts</category><category>Antivirus</category><category>MD5</category><category>Council of Digital Forensic Specialists</category><category>Google Street View</category><category>Expert Bias</category><category>child porn arrest</category><category>hayes command set</category><category>Geolocation</category><category>position paper</category><category>Hard disk drive</category><category>Gmail</category><category>Internet Sting</category><category>Used Computers</category><category>Forensic Toolkit</category><category>Syngress</category><category>Forensics Talk Show</category><category>Forensic Magazine</category><category>World Wide Web</category><category>Challenging computer forensics evidence</category><category>Jim Hoerricks</category><category>Do No harm</category><category>Digital Forensics Profession</category><category>north carolina</category><category>Computer Forensics</category><category>Incident Response</category><category>On-line game forensics</category><category>Internet Predator</category><category>Forensics Magazine</category><category>Talk Show</category><category>Rob Lee</category><category>Postcard Mysteries</category><category>Computer Repair</category><category>Information technology</category><category>Radio Show</category><category>Virtual Reality</category><category>Frank Bender</category><category>Intuit</category><category>File manager</category><category>Myspace</category><category>DOJ</category><category>Drive Prophet</category><category>Security</category><category>Forensic Video Analysis</category><category>NAMUS</category><category>SIMPLE</category><category>Muscle memory</category><category>Larry Daniel</category><category>Computer Repair Expectation of Privacy</category><category>Juries</category><category>Paranoia</category><category>Filesharing</category><category>BN.com</category><category>Jury</category><category>Expert Testimony</category><category>Rogue software</category><category>South Africa</category><category>consent to search</category><category>United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</category><category>Computer Forensics Career</category><category>Bradley</category><category>Plain View</category><category>Microsoft Word</category><category>Innocence Project</category><category>Wireless network</category><category>Hobby</category><category>Supreme Court</category><category>Data</category><category>Health care</category><category>MMORPG</category><category>Sex Crimes</category><category>Haiti</category><category>Personal Injury</category><category>Training</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>Second Life</category><category>Computer Foreniscs</category><category>discovery</category><title>Ex Forensis</title><description /><link>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>180</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ExForensis" /><feedburner:info uri="exforensis" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><thespringbox:skin xmlns:thespringbox="http://www.thespringbox.com/dtds/thespringbox-1.0.dtd">http://feeds.feedburner.com/ExForensis?format=skin</thespringbox:skin><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license><feedburner:emailServiceId>ExForensis</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/ExForensis" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FExForensis" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-6973087356233169776</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-15T18:20:30.221-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensic Jobs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics Career</category><title>Employment Opportunity with Guardian Digital Forensics</title><atom:summary>We are currently seeking applicants for either a Digital Forensics Examiner or Digital Forensics Technician position.

Our requirements:

Digital Forensics Examiner:

EnCE, DFCP, ACE, IACIS or other forensic certification, or the ability to complete and pass the EnCE or DFCP within one year.  We prefer testimony experience as well as case experience.  Must be willing and able to handle cases </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/oyuJGMQlt98/employment-opportunity-with-guardian.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/oyuJGMQlt98" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/03/employment-opportunity-with-guardian.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-1685851432387608495</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-29T09:01:30.613-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Intuit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">bbb.org</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Scams</category><title>New Spam Campaign - Spoofing Intuit</title><atom:summary>I got a couple of spam emails this morning supposedly from Intuit about a software order.  The fake email they constructed looked very good.

However, note the sending address: alerts@bbb.org.

Also, if you click on the links in the email, they DO NOT go to Intuit.  For the ones I received, the links were different although the email looked exactly the same.

As always, be very careful about </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/MoorkEXJiJM/new-spam-campaign-spoofing-intuit.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u528QvXp1bg/T04viRIhRgI/AAAAAAAAAdU/2eQrvCTAPaA/s72-c/Capture.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/MoorkEXJiJM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/02/new-spam-campaign-spoofing-intuit.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-4550682890707179655</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-09T18:18:51.636-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tax Scams</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Email Scams</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Scammers</category><title>It's Tax Time and the Scams Begin</title><atom:summary>I noticed that I am getting a rash of emails trapped in my spam filter at AppRiver. (They are a third party spam filtering and store and forward service.  I highly recommend them:  www.appriver.com)

Here is a screenie of one of them, claiming to be an email from Intuit, the makers of Quickbooks and Turbo Tax.



Fake email claiming to be from Intuit, Inc.









Not surprisingly, if you click </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/e1BZa3nQJKU/its-tax-time-and-scams-begin.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JbOnCzfwBVY/TzRQQY-VcdI/AAAAAAAAAdI/VcIe8wAFQ-4/s72-c/TaxScams.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/e1BZa3nQJKU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/02/its-tax-time-and-scams-begin.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-7780478749012135476</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-03T11:11:51.120-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cloud Storage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">e-discovery</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cloud Computing</category><title>Cloud Data and E-Discovery - Pay your bill or risk sanctions.</title><atom:summary>"Plaintiff Sanctioned for Negligence after Third Party Vendor Destroys ESI" from e-Discovery Case Law Update

"In Cyntegra, Inc. v. Idexx Laboratories, Inc. [pdf], CV 06-4170 (C.D. Cal. 2006), U.S. District Court Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, granted the defendant’s motion for an adverse inference instruction as a sanction holding that the plaintiff was negligent and failed its affirmative duty to </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/D9yVzykMTcA/cloud-data-and-e-discovery-pay-your.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/D9yVzykMTcA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2012/02/cloud-data-and-e-discovery-pay-your.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-3434851671494127469</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-21T09:32:12.310-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chloroform Hits</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chloroform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stenger</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CacheBack</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">NetAnalysis</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bradley</category><title>Casey  Anthony - More on the chloroform evidence</title><atom:summary>
I was reading the comments by readers of the story that appeared in the NY Times on July 18, 2011 regarding the chloroform searches in the Casey Anthony case.


Software Designer Reports Error in Anthony Trial

Several people commented that they didn't understand why John Bradley didn't notify the defense team or the media of the discrepancy in the 84 searches for chloroform in the Casey Anthony</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/cUGr1DVlG_M/casey-anthony-more-on-chloroform.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/cUGr1DVlG_M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/casey-anthony-more-on-chloroform.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-1427950722718383864</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-12T09:00:58.222-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chloroform Hits</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics Testimony</category><title>John Bradley Responds to Chloroform Search Discrepency in Casey Anthony Trial</title><atom:summary>John Bradley who testified about the chlorofrm search hits at the Casey Anthony trial responds to the questions about his testimony.

This is well worth reading if you want to get the inside scoop on what occurred regarding the Internet History in the Casey Anthony case regarding the chloroform searches, according to Mr. Bradley.

The link to John's response is below: 

http://www.cacheback.ca/</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/YQ7Ww5TLf70/john-bradley-responds-to-chloroform.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/YQ7Ww5TLf70" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/john-bradley-responds-to-chloroform.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-7790249451825373715</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-11T21:57:00.546-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chloroform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><title>Casey Anthony Digital Evidence - Chloroform Searches</title><atom:summary>Digital Detective posted an excellent analysis of the MORK file that was part of the Casey Anthony trial evidence related to the computer searches, particularly for chloroform.

Here is a link to the post. Digital Evidence Discrepencies - Casey Anthony Case  it is highly technical, but I would expect no less from the people who make NetAnalysis, a forensic tool I have used for several years now.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/jMjUYas96ng/casey-anthony-digital-evidence.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/jMjUYas96ng" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/casey-anthony-digital-evidence.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-7389283693461643463</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-08T01:29:27.883-04:00</atom:updated><title>A Digital Forensics Innocence Project</title><atom:summary>Image via WikipediaJoe Windish posted an article on the need for a computer forensics innocence project. For A Computer Forensics Innocence Project over at the TheModerate Voice.  What he advocates makes a lot of sense. "What we need is a Computers Forensics version of the Innocence Project.
 We need experts who believe in the presumption of innocence and are 
willing to spend the time it takes </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/Zojms7SqQ64/digital-forensics-innocence-project.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>4</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/Zojms7SqQ64" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/digital-forensics-innocence-project.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-8818829620204195475</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-05T17:20:16.590-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Casey Anthony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Verdict</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice System</category><title>Casey Anthony Verdict</title><atom:summary>Having spent two and a half years as a consulting expert in computer forensics and cell tower forensics on the Casey Anthony defense team, I have to say that Jose Baez was a pleasure to work with and did an herculean job in defending Casey Anthony.  Somehow he managed to juggle thousands of facts, dozens of experts and witnesses while under the intense scrutiny of the media and general public, </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/jvqwHf50zkE/casey-anthony-verdict.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>4</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/jvqwHf50zkE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/07/casey-anthony-verdict.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-612277063324036691</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-29T20:05:59.322-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Router</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Internet Protocol</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Filesharing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wireless router</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">IP address</category><title>Wireless Alone Is Not Probable Cause. . .</title><atom:summary>
Image via Wikipedia
A Wired and Wireless Router
I saw a post over on Technology Forensics, LLC's blog  on the topic of whether an IP (internet protocol) address from a wireless router should be enough to show probable cause to issue a warrant.

I can kind if see where they are going, but whether or not a warrant is issued for any IP address is not really the issue.  Whether or not the wireless </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/OcnKUm7XAsg/wireless-alone-is-not-probable-cause.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>6</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/OcnKUm7XAsg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/05/wireless-alone-is-not-probable-cause.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-4603683912041629131</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-04T11:05:58.380-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wireless network</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wireless</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wi-Fi</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wireless router</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">IPad</category><title>False Porn Accusations Underscore Wi-Fi privacy dangers</title><atom:summary>Image via WikipediaNearly everyone is going wireless these days.  It is just more convenient to have the ability to walk around the house with your iPad, use your laptop in a room where no cable connection exists, and is a lot cheaper than running network cable though the house or office.

What amazes me is how many open hotspots there are still around.  With all the news about security issues, </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/I7o0JR7icgI/false-porn-accusations-underscore-wi-fi.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/I7o0JR7icgI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/05/false-porn-accusations-underscore-wi-fi.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-1811994750861146863</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-04T08:59:44.348-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cell phones and crime</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">deleted text messages</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cell phone forensics</category><title>Phone companies' ditching of text messages might hamper crime investigations</title><atom:summary>Image via WikipediaHolly Zachariah, a  reporter for The Columbus Dispatch filed this story on Sunday, May 1, 2011:


Phone companies' ditching of text messages might hamper crime investigations

And her is report is right on the money.  The value of text messages in criminal cases cannot be denied.  They can be critical on both sides of the case.

The fact that the cellular carriers like Verizon,</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/ZWnwaR2OKkY/phone-companies-ditching-of-text.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/ZWnwaR2OKkY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/05/phone-companies-ditching-of-text.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-7677035161649624793</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 09:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-03T05:14:42.132-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SONY DATA BREACH</category><title>SONY On-Line Entertainment Breach Woes Continue</title><atom:summary>It has been in the news that SONY's Playstation network was breached in the last few days.  Their on-line gaming network has been breached as well.

Here is the gist of the email.



</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/vvPb6LC9ad8/sony-on-line-entertainment-breach-woes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ajtmPLO65zo/Tb_GlXvveII/AAAAAAAAAag/9A-8C9I-YT4/s72-c/5-3-2011+5-09-35+AM.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/vvPb6LC9ad8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/05/sony-on-line-entertainment-breach-woes.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-2630383258498113930</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-20T21:13:35.295-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Syngress</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Amazon.com</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Books</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">BN.com</category><title>The Book is Almost Here!</title><atom:summary>Over the last few months, Lars and I have been writing like crazy on our Syngress book, Digital Forensics for Legal Professionals.  While the book is still a few months away, you can order it now on Amazon!

Permalink: http://amzn.com/159749643X



</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/rsbcG6Gaf60/book-is-almost-here.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_rc35_0eNjMA/Ta-C5YmfzMI/AAAAAAAAAZM/8S1q1E_EvKo/s72-c/41lGKt3eALL._SL500_AA300__thumb.jpg?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/rsbcG6Gaf60" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/04/book-is-almost-here.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-8901865930548865802</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-01-31T20:59:31.172-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PI Licensing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Private Investigator Licensing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Foreniscs</category><title>PI Law Update–Virginia Weighs In</title><atom:summary>Technorati Tags: Private Investigator Laws,Virginia,Digital Forensics Licensing  
Image by MudflapDC via Flickr
On January 31, 2011 the Virginia house voted 98 to 0 to pass House Bill HB 2271  to exempt Digital Forensics from the state Private Investigator law.

Here is a summary:

”Computer and digital forensic services; exempt from regulation as a private security service business.  Exempts </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/wSw-Rw3Ri9w/pi-law-updatevirginia-weighs-in.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4074/4740517418_75f32cf949_t.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/wSw-Rw3Ri9w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2011/01/pi-law-updatevirginia-weighs-in.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-1206520087222873028</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-12-27T14:28:09.769-05:00</atom:updated><title>Electronic Discovery Just Keeps Getting More Complex</title><atom:summary>   I have this application that I use and it is awesome.  DropBox.  DropBox is a cloud based (Internet) application that allows me and my team to share documents and access them virtually from anywhere.  I can review and edit these documents on my desktop, my laptop, my iPad, and review them on my Android phone.  Talk about convenience. What is so cool about the application is that it also </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/AB1ygirx8Gk/electronic-discovery-just-keeps-getting.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_rc35_0eNjMA/TRjox0lCOQI/AAAAAAAAAY4/vgGW2L-4i1k/s72-c/DropboxMenu_thumb4.jpg?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/AB1ygirx8Gk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/12/electronic-discovery-just-keeps-getting.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-1610511198016817220</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-12-05T11:56:29.265-05:00</atom:updated><title>Holiday Cheer - Drive Prophet Sale</title><atom:summary>Now that the holidays are here, I thought it would be nice to put Drive Prophet on sale for the month of December.  Enter the coupon code holidays at the payment screen and receive 25% off the regular price of Drive Prophet.

You can learn more about Drive Prophet at www.driveprophet.com</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/yv-mgAT3mZ4/holiday-cheer-drive-prophet-sale.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_rc35_0eNjMA/TPvEDhbZxBI/AAAAAAAAAYo/aHFfzgBrXRo/s72-c/DPMENU.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/yv-mgAT3mZ4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/12/holiday-cheer-drive-prophet-sale.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-5635434461209591926</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-11-14T10:55:18.059-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Limewire</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Recording Industry Association of America</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gnutella</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Filesharing</category><title>Limewire–Down but not out</title><atom:summary>  
Image via WikipediaI just read a very good article over at DFI News.  
Frosted Limes- The Unintended Consequences of Shutting Down LimewireWhen I saw the part about Limewire not connecting for users, I had to go see what was happening.  I opened up Limewire on my test machine and sure enough, it would not connect.
But…..It took me about five minutes to find the workaround to make it connect </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/1nILeUevAmM/limewiredown-but-not-out.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/1nILeUevAmM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/11/limewiredown-but-not-out.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-3096849192069598393</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-10-31T13:22:13.714-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Expert system</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics Experts</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Digital Forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Forensics Art and Science</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Digital Forensics Science</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Digital Triage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Expert Systems</category><title>The Future of Digital Forensics Tools</title><atom:summary>  Image via Wikipedia I just read a great post over at Eric J. Huber’s blog, A Fistful of Dongles: The Future of Digital Forensic Tools I would agree with everything Eric said.  However I would like to take it a bit further. Eric stopped his post at the third generation.  I have been thinking for quite some time about the Fourth Generation of digital forensics tools.  When you have completed a </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/8NEkkSBVEv8/future-of-digital-forensics-tools.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/8NEkkSBVEv8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/10/future-of-digital-forensics-tools.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-2160965691817669729</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-10-28T11:04:56.567-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">P2P File Sharing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kazaa</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">P2P</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Limewire</category><title>Limewire Forced to Close: Is It the End of File Sharing As We Know It?</title><atom:summary>  Image via WikipediaIn a recent court ruling, Limewire has been forced to close its website.  While Limewire made for a really huge target for music company lawsuits, just like Napster was in the past, the injunction missed the real target.I just fired up Limewire on one of my test computers, and as suspected, it works just like always.  The only difference is the legal notice that pops up when </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/qo3av9bvSy0/limewire-forced-to-close-is-it-end-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_rc35_0eNjMA/TMmMOpGW9FI/AAAAAAAAAYk/_VgOjsy2tik/s72-c/LimewireLegalNotice.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/qo3av9bvSy0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/10/limewire-forced-to-close-is-it-end-of.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-9031803196963393785</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-10-30T19:07:57.583-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Unverified Sender</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Children</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cell Phone Safety</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cell phone forensics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cell phone features</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cell phones</category><title>Spoofing Calls and Texts: The Dangerous Side of Services</title><atom:summary> 
Image via WikipediaWhat many see as nice features and services, those who are a bit more security conscious see the potential for harm.
One such service is called spoofing.  This allows you to call someone using a completely fake phone number or any phone number you choose, and mask your identity even including faking your voice.
While this can be a useful service for those who need to mask </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/DCskSjzH2VY/spoofing-calls-and-texts-dangerous-side.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/DCskSjzH2VY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/08/spoofing-calls-and-texts-dangerous-side.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-3248154096889043583</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-08-10T08:44:08.568-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Browser Caching</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Internet safety</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Internet Caching</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Internet Cache</category><title>Private Browsing: Not so private after all.</title><atom:summary>Technorati Tags: Private Browsing,Incognito Mode,Internet History   Image by Vurter via Flickr In an article published this morning over at ZDNet, by Tom Espiner, it appears that clicking on that Private Browsing mode in your Internet Explorer, Firefox, Google Chrome or Safari may not be all that private after all.  ”The private browsing features in Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/6S0G9sf0KDo/private-browsing-not-so-private-after.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3627/3368903957_84c710a3ba_t.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/6S0G9sf0KDo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/08/private-browsing-not-so-private-after.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-3198276943086044890</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-08-02T23:18:28.953-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Repair</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Data Loss Prevention</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer security</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Buyer Beware</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Computer Support</category><title>Buying a business? Change all the keys, not just the physical ones.</title><atom:summary>  Image by Bohman via Flickr I get calls from folks asking me about people getting into their networks when they have recently purchased a business from someone else, or when an employee has recently left, willingly or otherwise. In larger businesses that have in house IT support, they probably have the IT people take care of this.  But in smaller businesses that do not have internal IT support </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/l8RhweewqZY/buying-business-change-all-keys-not.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Larry E. Daniel, DFCP, EnCE, BCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/97/210977249_da533e62a4_t.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/l8RhweewqZY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/08/buying-business-change-all-keys-not.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-2728811209987384600</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-07-23T19:18:30.200-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">courtroom presentations</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">write blocker</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Internet Caching</category><title>A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words: Part 2</title><atom:summary>Given the number of downloads we have had of the images I posted in the post “A Picture is Worth A Thousand Words,” I’d say their popularity exceeded my expectations.   I was organizing my files today and came across some more images I have made for my own presentations and for use in court.  I post these images in high quality because I want to share them with the community.  So feel free to </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/Fv6AC0gZ3cE/picture-is-worth-thousand-words-part-2.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lars Daniel, EnCE)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_J9GkgI58Uoo/TEhoMvdDC0I/AAAAAAAAAEw/sPT0fWQ29Zg/s72-c/Internet%20Caching_thumb%5B3%5D.jpg?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/Fv6AC0gZ3cE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/07/picture-is-worth-thousand-words-part-2.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839981365154987340.post-8216960676404303706</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-07-07T11:11:43.471-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Andy Spruill</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CEIC 2010</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Larry Daniel</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lynita Hinsch</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Expert Witness</category><title>Into The Breach: Expert Witness Testimony</title><atom:summary> 
Image via WikipediaLast week I testified as an expert witness for the first time.  While I was confident in my ability to testify to what I had done in the case, it was still a bit of a nerve wracking experience.  It was definitely intimidating to ponder upon the fact that what I said on the stand that day would go into public record and exist forever. 

Luckily I have been able to learn a </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExForensis/~3/TVa3GAzcOGA/into-breach-expert-witness-testimony.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lars Daniel, EnCE)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ExForensis/~4/TVa3GAzcOGA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://exforensis.blogspot.com/2010/07/into-breach-expert-witness-testimony.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

