Finance, Taxes and the Economy

Georgia Department of Revenue Announces New Anti-Fraud Program

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:49:00 +0000

The Georgia Department of Revenue has put in place new security measures to prevent tax fraud in Georgia. The Department has taken these actions due to the increase in fraudulent filings over the last several years.

The Department will run each return through a process to ensure that the information provided on the return is accurate. If a tax return is flagged by our process because of potential inconsistencies, the taxpayer will be asked to provide the Department with some additional information in order to process the return.

“This new process will help prevent tax fraud in Georgia,” said Department of Revenue Commissioner Doug MacGinnitie. “Stopping fraud is a Department priority, and we will continue to take the steps necessary to protect taxpayers and taxpayer money.”

The Department estimates that the new process will save the state millions of dollars, with little inconvenience to legitimate taxpayers.

“By using this new system, we will cut off a way for criminals to commit fraud against Georgia taxpayers, as well as save the State millions of dollars in revenue,” said Commissioner MacGinnitie.

Georgia Republicans Speak Out on Tax Day

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:13:00 +0000

Monday, April 18, 2011 will mark Tax Day. Members of the Georgia delegation joined together to comment on the impact Tax Day has on American families and small businesses, and how improvements can be made to our tax system. Below are their statements.

Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (GA-03): “Each year as I sit down to prepare my taxes, I am reminded of just how convoluted our tax code has become. It’s filled with confusing and sometimes contradicting language and secret loopholes, creating an unfair system where those who can afford high-priced tax professionals can skirt their obligations while everyday Americans are stuck with an ever-growing tax burden. That’s why I have been a strong supporter of the Fair Tax. The Fair Tax would replace the income tax with a sales tax, eliminating the confusing process of filing your income tax return each year. However, the answer to the confusion of our tax code is absolutely not higher taxes, like those proposed by President Obama. The answer to our current debt problem is less spending in Washington – not higher taxes on the backs of American families and small businesses. ”

Rep. Tom Price, M.D. (GA-06), Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee: “Washington has a spending problem, not a revenue problem, and yet we are reminded every Tax Day that there are those in Washington who still believe we need to take more from the American people in order to grow government. Every dollar taken by the government is one less dollar the American people can use themselves to pursue their dreams, grow our economy, and create jobs. Rather than higher taxes, we should focus on tax reform that will lower rates and broaden the base to make America more competitive in the global economy and expand opportunities for families.”

Rep. Jack Kingston (GA-01): “Economic growth doesn’t start in Washington, it ends there. That’s why I work every day to keep the tax burden on working Georgians low and to serve as a check on the growth of government. The road to recovery starts with allowing working families and small businesses to keep more of what they make, not siphoning their hard-earned dollars to big government bureaucrats.”

Rep. Austin Scott (GA-08): “This week the President outlined a plan that raises taxes on nearly every single American taxpayer. Americans are taxed enough already. As a small business owner, I can tell you that taking more money out of the American people’s pockets is not the way to create jobs and stimulate our economy. We must continue to cut unnecessary spending and incentivize small business owners instead of taxing them at every turn.”

Rep. Tom Graves (GA-09): “To borrow the famous words of Bastiat, the arrival of Tax Day marks another year of ‘legal plunder.’ As Americans review how much of their hard earned paychecks were taken by the government, the President has made a poorly timed promise to raise taxes on families and small businesses by 2013. With our towering debt and deficits, and the many years of fiscal mismanagement, it defies common sense to give this government a raise. The big government experiment has failed, and I’ll continue to make that case over the next year as we fight to defend the family paycheck.”

Rep. Paul Broun (GA-10): “This year’s Tax Day serves as a painful reminder that Americans across the country are struggling everyday to make ends meet, and unemployment is still skyrocketing in almost every city nation-wide. Our unsustainable debt and imploding deficits continue to raise doubt and uncertainty for job creators, so the economy remains in limbo. Yet, President Obama’s only plan to kick the economy into gear involves raising taxes and expanding the overreach of the federal government. The last thing families and small businesses want to do is hand over more of their hard earned paychecks to the government. Moreover, hiking taxes will only further kill jobs and drive our small businesses deeper into the red. I will continue to fight for meaningful spending cuts, to repeal Obamacare and its job-killing mandates, and to ensure the growth of the private sector – so that next year’s Tax Day won’t be such a sting.”

Rep. Phil Gingrey, M.D. (GA-11): “Today, many Americans and small businesses will file their income taxes, entrusting their government to use those tax dollars responsibly. While most believe their tax burden is already too high, if President Obama has his way, that burden will be even higher,” said Rep. Gingrey. “A tax increase on America’s job creators would be devastating to our economy and would stifle our rate of job growth, which is already painfully slow. The President must understand — in order to prevent the burden of our nation’s fiscal crisis from being passed on to job creators and America’s workforce — the solution to our nation’s fiscal woes is not more taxation, it’s less spending.”
---
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
Facebook: http://facebook.com/ArtsAcrossGA

Fund for local governments keeps top rating

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:28:00 +0000

Gov. Nathan Deal and Georgia Treasurer Tommy Hills today (March 22) announced that the nationally recognized credit rating firm of Standard and Poor’s affirmed its highest money market fund rating of AAA for Georgia’s own Georgia Fund 1.

“Georgia continues to demonstrate excellence in terms of AAA ratings,” said Deal. “The success of Georgia Fund 1 is a reflection of our state’s commitment to sound fiscal management, even during the worst of budget crunches.”

Treasurer Hills echoed his sentiment: “I am gratified that Standard and Poor's continues to assign its highest rating to Georgia Fund 1,” said Hills. “This is a clear signal to Georgians that their governmental funds are being invested in adherence with the highest standards of money management."

For the past 30 years the Office of the Georgia State Treasurer has managed and administered a local government investment pool (LGIP) called Georgia Fund 1. The LGIP is available for the short-term investment funds of Georgia’s county and city governments and school boards, co-investing with the state treasury and Georgia’s colleges and universities. Georgia Fund 1 operates like a traditional money market fund for governments providing all investors with safety, liquidity and competitive investment returns.

Georgia Fund 1 is one of the largest LGIP’s in the nation, and for the past 20 years its investment performance has outperformed the benchmark returns for all LGIP’s. More than $8 ½ billion is currently invested in Georgia Fund 1.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG @FayetteFP

Census Bureau Reports State Government Tax Collections Decrease $14 Billion in 2010

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:10:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- State government tax collections decreased $14.3 billion to $704.6 billion in fiscal year 2010, the U.S. Census Bureau reported today. There was a $65.8 billion decrease in 2009.

These new data come from the 2010 Annual Survey of State Government Tax Collections , which contains annual statistics on the fiscal year tax collections of all 50 state governments, including receipts from licenses and compulsory fees. Tax revenues also include related penalty and interest receipts of the governments.

"The first response of researchers and analysts, when confronted with a new tax policy question, is to see what the Annual Survey of State Government Tax Collections data tell them about the question," said John Mikesell, a Chancellor's Professor at Indiana University's School of Public and Environmental Affairs. "These data make the public finance world easier to understand and to analyze."

According to the survey, corporate net income tax revenue was $38.2 billion, down 6.6 percent, while tax revenue on individual income was $236.4 billion, down 4.4 percent. General sales tax revenue was $224.5 billion, down 1.8 percent. These taxes comprised 70.8 percent of all state government tax collections nationally.

This survey provides an annual summary of taxes collected by state for up to 25 tax categories. For more information about this survey, visit http://www.census.gov/govs/statetax/.

Eleven states saw increases in total tax revenue in fiscal year 2010, led by North Dakota (9.6 percent), North Carolina (4.8 percent), Nevada (4.0 percent), and California (3.8 percent).

The states with the largest total tax revenue decreases were Wyoming (23.4 percent), Louisiana (14.2 percent), Oklahoma (13.5 percent), and Montana (11.0 percent).

States with the largest percent decrease in revenue from individual income taxes were Louisiana (22.2 percent), Tennessee (22.2 percent), North Dakota (18.0 percent) and New Hampshire (16.2 percent).

Severance taxes — collected for removal or harvesting of natural resources (e.g., oil, gas, coal, timber, fish, etc.) — were down $2.3 billion, a 17.4 percent decrease. This followed a 24.8 percent decrease in fiscal year 2009. The largest decreases in severance tax revenue were seen in the West and South. The Midwest saw an increase in severance tax revenue this year.

Revenue on taxes imposed distinctively on insurance companies and measured by gross or adjusted gross premiums (insurance premium sales tax) increased $754.0 million, up 5.0 percent. This followed a 4.6 percent decrease in fiscal year 2009. The largest increases in insurance premium sales tax revenue were seen in the Northeast and South.

These data do not include employer and employee assessments for retirement and social insurance purposes. Also excluded are collections for the unemployment compensation taxes imposed by each of the state governments. In addition, these data include tax collections for state governments only; they do not include tax collections from local governments.

Although the data are not subject to sampling error, the statistics are subject to possible inaccuracies in classification, response and processing. Every effort is made to keep such errors to a minimum through care in examining, editing and tabulating the data.

The tax revenue data pertain to state fiscal years that ended June 30, 2010, in all but four states. Amounts shown for these four states reflect the different timing of their respective fiscal years, which were the 12-month periods ending on March 31, 2010, for New York; Aug. 31, 2010, for Texas; and Sept. 30, 2010, for Alabama and Michigan.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG @FayetteFP

Habersham Bank Closed by Georgia Department of Banking and Finance

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:48:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- Habersham Bancorp (OTC Bulletin Board: HABC) announced that the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance closed its subsidiary bank, Habersham Bank, and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. Habersham Bancorp is no longer the parent of Habersham Bank.

In a virtually simultaneous transaction, SCBT National Association acquired the operations and all deposits and purchased essentially all assets of the Bank in a loss-share transaction facilitated by the FDIC and will continue to operate the Bank, according to an FDIC news release. Customers who have questions about the foregoing matters, or who would like more information about the closure of the Bank, can visit the FDIC's web site located at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/habersham.html, or call the FDIC toll-free at 1-866-806-6128.

In a prepared statement, Habersham Bancorp said: "While we ultimately were unable to save the Bank in the face of unyielding market conditions, the Board of Directors worked tirelessly over the past two years on behalf of the Company and its shareholders and attempted every reasonable solution. In particular, over the last several months, the Board and management team had been working on an offering of common stock to residents of the State of Georgia in an effort to recapitalize the Bank. Our Board and management team also pursued other transactions, including mergers with other institutions and sales of the Bank's assets. Despite our best efforts, the continuing depressed market conditions prevented us from completing these transactions."

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG @FayetteFP

Free Tax Assistance from Clayton State University School of Business Accounting Students, February 19

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:52:00 +0000

Accounting students from Clayton State University have been busy reviewing all the tax law changes for 2010; that’s because they are participating in the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program hosted by the University’s School of Business, that provides free tax support for certain eligible taxpayers.

For the 2011 tax season, this service will be offered at the Clayton School of Business on the following Saturdays; Feb. 19, Feb. 26, Mar. 19 and Mar. 26, from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Taxpayers will be assisted on a first come, first serve basis. If taxpayers have further questions they may call the VITA hotline at (678) 466-4527.

VITA has been in existence for 37 years, and provides volunteers with extensive IRS training and testing. The volunteers can then ensure that taxpayers will have their tax returns filled out accurately and timely and receive the tax credits they qualify for, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit. Students can also benefit from having VITA volunteers prepare their taxes because the volunteers are trained in the recent changes to the credits available for tuition and other school-related expenses. The VITA program also prepares state income tax returns and provides free e-filing options to ensure clients receive their refunds as soon as possible.

Those interested in receiving this assistance must bring the following items:

photo identification,
social security cards for themselves, their spouse, and dependents,
birthdates,
wage and earnings statements from all employers,
interest and dividend statements,
other relevant information about income and expenses including day care expenses,
a copy of last year’s federal and state income tax returns if possible,
bank routing and account numbers for direct deposit.

Please note that both spouses will need to be present to file electronically.

A unit of the University System of Georgia, Clayton State University is an outstanding comprehensive metropolitan university located 15 miles southeast of downtown Atlanta.

Nearly Half of Seniors Receiving Lower Social Security Checks in 2011

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:58:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- Forty-four percent of seniors are receiving lower Social Security checks this year compared to 2010, while even more are dealing with significantly higher expenses. The findings come from an annual survey of elderly Americans, released earlier today by The Senior Citizens League (TSCL), one of the nation's largest nonpartisan senior citizens advocacy groups.

Of seniors receiving lower checks, one in four report receiving at least $50 less per month, and one in nine are receiving at least $100 less per month.

At the same time, nearly two-thirds of seniors (61 percent) estimate their expenses have increased by at least $80 per month compared to last year.

Social Security checks are lower because many seniors have their Medicare Part D or Medicare Advantage premiums automatically deducted, and these premiums have increased in many cases. An annual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) typically offsets such premium increases, but seniors are not receiving a COLA for the second year in a row.

"The combination of lower benefits and higher expenses means many more seniors will have a hard time making ends meet this year," said Larry Hyland, chairman of The Senior Citizens League. "More of them will have to make very difficult choices and cut back on basic things such as health care and utilities."

Almost 70 percent of beneficiaries depend on Social Security for 50 percent or more of their income. Social Security is the sole source of income for 15 percent of beneficiaries.

TSCL supports emergency COLA legislation and opposes any deficit reduction proposals that would cut the COLA.

SURVEY METHODOLOGY: The survey was conducted through print and electronic surveys from December 13, 2010, through January 31, 2011. It had 1,253 Social Security recipients. Full survey results are available on request.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG @FayetteFP

Georgia Income Tax Returns Are Being Processed And Accepted Despite IRS Delay

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:44:00 +0000

The Internal Revenue Service announced on January 20 that they will not accept e-filed or paper returns from a select group of taxpayers until mid-February due to changes to the 2010 Federal Internal Revenue Code. However, the Georgia Department of Revenue announced today it is accepting and processing Georgia income tax returns that are e-filed via the joint IRS e-file system.

The affected taxpayers who e-file their Georgia income tax return only will have the return accepted and processed without delay. All paper filed Georgia income tax returns will also be accepted.

The IRS announcement affects all 1040 filers with a Schedule A, among others. For more information on the affected taxpayers, please see the IRS press release which can be accessed here:

http://www.irs.ustreas.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=234736,00.html?portlet=7

States Set to Go On Bankruptcy Bonanza

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:06:00 +0000

Insolvency talks underway with Obama administration

The most important question for 2011 may be just emerging on the national policy scene: How many states will declare bankruptcy this year?

It would be a first-time ever event, but the New York Times has already reported that state policy makers, congressional leaders and officials in the Obama administration are already involved in behind-the-scenes discussions regarding whether declaring bankruptcy may be the only solution available to states with budget crises that cannot be resolved any other way.

"Beyond their short-term budget gaps, some states have deep structural problems, like insolvent pension funds, that are diverting money from essential public services like education and health care," Mary Williams Walsh wrote in the Times. "Some members of Congress fear that it is just a matter of time before a state seeks a bailout, says bankruptcy lawyers who have been consulted by congressional aides."

Still, it is doubtful the federal government will bail out near-bankrupt states, despite the severe cutbacks in public welfare services the state budgetary crises are causing.

Federal bailouts of the states would amount to nationalizing the states and could produce a constitutional crisis, especially if the federal government assumes as it usually assumes that the federal government has a right to control whatever the federal government pays for.

By pursuing bankruptcy, a state could seek to get out of contractual agreements to pay public employee pensions the state may no longer be able to afford.

"Bankruptcy could permit a state to alter its contractual promises to retirees, which are often protected by state constitutions, and it could provide an alternative to a no-strings bailout," Walsh noted.

Inevitably, states declaring bankruptcy could send major shocks through the municipal bond markets, with the unfortunate result that borrowing costs for all state and local governments may escalate dramatically.

The problem is that state governments, unlike the federal government, cannot simply print money.

New Jersey public employee crisis

In December, the State of New Jersey disclosed that the unfunded pension liability for state government employees grew from $45.8 billion to $53.9 billion in 2009, an increase of 18 percent.

New Jersey public employee pension funds currently cover some 800,000 workers in seven different pension funds covering a wide range of government employees, including teachers, police officers, firefighters, judges and bureaucrats.

The Philadelphia Inquirer reported that New Jersey residents have the largest unfunded pension liabilities in the nation.

New Jersey pension funds now have only 62 percent of the funds necessary to pay future promised obligations, down from 66 percent the year before.

To put this in perspective, pension experts generally recommend that state pensions should be funded to at least 80 percent of their current and future obligations.

New Jersey also has an unfunded obligation of $66.8 billion for health-care costs, in addition to the $53.9 billion unfunded pension liability.

Again, to put this in perspective, the entire state budget for New Jersey this year is $29.4 billion.

Gov. Christie recommended a wide range of changes for New Jersey public employment pensions, including rolling back benefits by as much as 9 percent, increasing the retirement age for teachers from 62 to 65, and requiring all state employees to contribute 8.5 percent of their salaries to the state pension system, instead of the 3 percent some public employees now pay.

Still, even these changes might not be enough to make a meaningful dent on the state's unfunded pension obligations.

State budget crisis faces nation in 2011

Last October, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reported that to balance their 2011 budgets, states had to address fiscal year 2011 gaps totaling an estimated $125 billion, or 19 percent of budgets in 46 states.

State tax revenues were 8.4 percent lower in fiscal year 2009 than in 2008, and an additional 3.1 percent lower in 2010, reflecting the worst recession since the 1930s.

"States will continue to struggle to find the revenue needed to support critical public services for a number of years, threatening hundreds of thousands of jobs," the Center reported.

The Center sees no diminishment in budget problems in 2012.

Already 39 states have projected budget gaps that are expected to total $112 billion for fiscal year 2012, a budget gap that is expected to grow to approximately $140 billion once all states have submitted their 2010 estimates. Even worse, the federal aid to the states provided by the February 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and to a smaller extent in the August 2010 jobs bill, estimated at $60 billion in 2011, is expected to decline to $6 billion in 2012.

"Taking all these factors into account, it is reasonable to expect that for 2012, shortfalls are likely to exceed $140 billion with only $6 billion in federal Recovery Act dollars remaining available," the report concluded.

FROM JEROME CORSI'S RED ALERT
By Dr. Jerome Corsi
(c) 2010 RedAlert.WND.com

Shared with permission

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Jerome R. Corsi received a Ph.D. from Harvard University in political science in 1972. He is the author of the #1 New York Times bestselling books THE OBAMA NATION: LEFTIST POLITICS AND THE CULT OF PERSONALITY and the co-author of UNFIT FOR COMMAND: SWIFT BOAT VETERANS SPEAK OUT AGAINST JOHN KERRY. He is also the author of AMERICA FOR SALE, THE LATE GREAT U.S.A., and WHY ISRAEL CAN'T WAIT. Currently, Dr. Corsi is a Senior Managing Director in the Financial Services Group at Gilford Securities as well as a senior staff writer for WorldNetDaily.com.

ABOUT GILFORD SECURITIES: Gilford Securities, founded in 1979, is a full-service boutique investment firm headquartered in New York City providing an array of financial services to institutional and retail clients. From investment banking and equity research to retirement planning and wealth management services, our financial experts are prepared to accommodate the needs of investors. For more information about Gilford Securities please visit, Click Here: http://www.gilfordsecurities.com/financial-services-group.php

The views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect Gilford Securities Incorporated's views, opinions, positions or strategies. Gilford Securities Incorporated makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information expressed herein and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.

ABOUT RED ALERT: Jerome Corsi's RED ALERT is your weekly, global financial strategies newsletter. Designed to be your guide to economic trends in the best of times and the worst of times, it is edited by New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi, Senior Managing Director of the Financial Services Group at Gilford Securities as well as a WND senior staff writer and columnist. For 25 years, Corsi worked with banks throughout the U.S. and the world developing financial services marketing companies to assist banks in establishing broker/dealers and insurance subsidiaries to provide financial planning products and services to their retail customers. Corsi developed three third-party financial services marketing firms that reached annual gross sales levels of $1 billion in annuities and equal volume in mutual funds. Corsi received his Ph.D. in political science from Harvard University in 1972.

Camp, Boustany Request Answers From Treasury Secretary Geithner on Tax Refund Pilot Program

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:03:00 +0000

Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) and Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Charles Boustany (R-LA) sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner inquiring about a pilot program the Department of Treasury (Treasury) announced on January 13, which would deliver tax refunds to 600,000 individuals through the distribution of pre-paid debit cards.

In the letter, the Chairmen outlined several concerns related to the pilot program, including fees that might be assessed on recipients who receive their tax refunds through a pre-paid debit card. As part of the Committee’s oversight jurisdiction relating to the activities of the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, Camp and Boustany requested Treasury provide information (by February 3) related to the pilot program, including how recipients of the pilot program were chosen, a copy of the program materials and an explanation of all of the fees and charges that will be incurred by some of taxpayers enrolled in the pilot program.

The full letter can be read here.

---
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
Facebook: http://facebook.com/ArtsAcrossGA
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI), Committee on Ways and Means Hearing on Fundamental Tax Reform

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:53:00 +0000

(Remarks as Prepared)

Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) today delivered opening remarks at the Committee on Ways and Means Hearing on Fundamental Tax Reform. Below are excerpts, followed by the full remarks.

The Tax Code

“Clearly, the tax code is too complex, too costly, and takes too much time to comply with. All this adds more burdens on families and employers – making it more difficult to create jobs in this country.

“I am under no illusion that the task before us will be easy. To really reform the tax code in a way that lowers the tax rate, broadens the base, and promotes the competitiveness of American companies, we will need to make some tough choices.”

Tax Reform Requires Both Bipartisan Effort and a Conversation with American People
“I don’t think this can be, nor should it be, a partisan exercise. And it cannot happen just because one Chamber passes a bill. It will require the active participation of all Members of this Committee. It will require us to work with the Administration. And yes, we will even have to talk to the Senate.

“More importantly, we will talk to the American people – individuals, families, employers (large and small) – who are actually impacted by the laws we pass here in Washington.”

###

We meet today, in our first hearing of the 112th Congress, to begin what I expect will be a long discussion – and one that I hope will be bipartisan – on the need to reform our federal income tax system.

As I did on Tuesday, let me again extend my appreciation to the Ranking Member for agreeing to allow this hearing to move forward today, even though the Committee did not officially organize until two days ago.

Twenty-five years ago, a Democratic House and a Republican Senate sent to the White House, and the President signed, landmark legislation known today in the tax world as “The 86 Act.”

That law, which marked the successful culmination of years of work, broadened the tax base and lowered tax rates. It remains the basis of our system of taxation.

But it is, in some sense, a shell of its former self.

In the intervening years, Members of Congress – from both sides of the aisle – have loaded the tax code with a dizzying array of credits, deductions, exclusions, and exemptions.

The late economist David Bradford once provided a tongue-in-cheek example to illustrate the concept of tax expenditures and why they are little more than disguised spending.

Bradford proposed to cut the defense budget for weapons procurement to zero, while creating a new Weapons Supply Tax Credit that could be claimed by defense contractors for appropriate weapons “donated” to the Pentagon.

Under this regime, it would appear to the untrained eye that both spending and taxes would be reduced, thus allowing elected officials to claim that government was “smaller.” But in reality, nothing would have changed. A spending program would still exist; it just would be cleverly disguised as a “tax cut”.

Bradford’s cautionary tale seems all too real to those who have parsed the tax code and its mysterious tax expenditures for congressionally blessed industries and activities, both big and small.

Regardless of the merits of any individual tax expenditure, the broader picture is not a pretty one.

The President’s deficit commission that I served on, along with the gentleman from Wisconsin, Mr. Ryan and the gentleman from California, Mr. Becerra, measured the impact of these expenditures in terms of higher tax rates. The Bowles-Simpson report makes clear that taxpayers foot the bill for those expenditures in the form of higher tax rates.

The Bowles-Simpson report called for eliminating all tax expenditures and would moved individual income tax rates to 8, 14, and 23 percent and dropped the corporate tax rate to just 26 percent. And if their plan used all of the higher revenue from eliminating tax expenditures to push down tax rates, those number rates would have been even lower.

As we will hear from Nina Olson, the Taxpayer Advocate, the impact of the changes to the tax code to create, expand, and extend these expenditures can be measured by the tens of thousands of additional pages added to the code or the thousands of changes enacted in the last decade alone.

Clearly, the tax code is too complex, too costly, and takes too much time to comply with. All this adds more burdens on families and employers – making it more difficult to create jobs in this country.

I am under no illusion that the task before us will be easy. To really reform the tax code in a way that lowers the tax rate, broadens the base, and promotes the competitiveness of American companies, we will need to make some tough choices.

I don’t think this can be, nor should it be, a partisan exercise. And it cannot happen just because one Chamber passes a bill. It will require the active participation of all Members of this Committee. It will require us to work with the Administration. And yes, we will even have to talk to the Senate.

More importantly, we will talk to the American people – individuals, families, employers (large and small) – who are actually impacted by the laws we pass here in Washington.

So, this is just the first hearing of many. I have asked our witnesses to confine their remarks at this first hearing to defining the problems of the current income tax system.

I look forward to hearing from many other witnesses, and working with all of you, as we undertake this enormous challenge. As we do so, we will have many further opportunities to consider various solutions. But today, our focus should be on making sure we begin to understand the scope of the challenge.

With that, I yield to my friend, the Ranking Member.
---
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
Facebook: http://facebook.com/ArtsAcrossGA
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

Big U.S. Tax on Overseas Earnings Means Fewer Jobs Here, Finance Pros Say

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:03:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- U.S. corporations are making fewer domestic hires and investing less in U.S. operations, due to cash trapped overseas, according to a recent survey from the Association for Financial Professionals (AFP). High U.S. corporate tax rates create an incentive for companies to leave cash abroad, often permanently.

In follow-up questions to AFP's recent 2011 Business Outlook Survey, 26% of respondents with operations abroad say that excessive U.S. corporate tax discourages their organization from bringing cash back to the U.S. and using it to invest in corporate growth in the form of new hires, capital investments, or research and development.

Proponents of the current tax rates on repatriated foreign earnings say the tax deters companies from making investments in non-U.S. operations and stems the flow of American-based jobs overseas, but AFP members indicate that this is not the case. Of those with non-U.S. operations responding to the survey, two-thirds indicate that the tax on repatriated foreign earnings at current rates has little to no impact on the decision to begin or continue operations outside of the U.S.

"Capital is mobile. Companies have choices about where to locate and where to invest," said Jim Kaitz, AFP's president and CEO. "For U.S. companies to grow domestic operations and make hires here, AFP believes that the current corporate tax regime must become competitive with that of other nations."

In a January 2011 policy statement, AFP said that U.S. companies should be permitted to repatriate foreign earnings at a tax rate that allows the U.S. to compete for investment of those earnings with other countries that tax those earnings at significantly lower rates. AFP recently delivered the same message to members of the 112th U.S. Congress, the White House and staff of the U.S. Treasury.

Since U.S. companies can choose when and if ever to repatriate earnings that are taxable in the U.S., the lost tax revenue is extremely low. In fact, a more favorable tax treatment might increase tax revenue in both the short- and long-term because companies would no longer have a strong incentive to avoid high U.S. taxes by reinvesting foreign earnings elsewhere. The likely inflow of capital to the U.S. could stimulate capital investment and hiring, contributing to economic recovery and long-term economic growth.

Reported estimates have U.S. corporations holding $1 trillion in cash and cash-like investments abroad.

AFP members, who are responsible for ensuring that their organizations have enough cash on hand to fund operations, are uniquely positioned to observe the cash flows of their organizations, and many of them are directly responsible for tax-related issues. Since they work in a wide range of industries and in both public and private organizations of varying sizes, their opinions reflect a broad corporate perspective that is both operational and strategic.

ABOUT THE SURVEY

From November 29 through December 10, 2010, the AFP surveyed U.S. financial professionals about current and expected business conditions in the U.S., then sent follow-up questions based upon policy issues, which included corporate tax issues for repatriated cash and floating NAV for money market funds. These two issues are the focus of the 2011 AFP Business Outlook Survey Policy Supplement. The original survey generated 808 responses from professionals holding a variety of financial positions within their organizations, including CFO, vice president of finance, treasurer and assistant treasurer. The results produce a margin of error of +/- 3.4 percent.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG @FayetteFP

Georgia Tax Reform Report a Taxpayer Protection Pledge Violation

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:04:00 +0000

Council on Tax Reform recommends net tax increase on Georgians

Today Americans for Tax Reform announced that a vote in favor of the recommendations of the 2010 Special Council on Tax Reform and Fairness for Georgians would violate the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, as it constitutes a net tax increase. 55 Georgia lawmakers, including Governor Nathan Deal, House Speaker David Ralston, and Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers have signed the Pledge, a written promise to constituents to oppose and vote against or veto all tax increases.

While the Council proposes some pro-growth reforms, such as the gradual reduction of personal and corporate income tax rates, they are more than offset with net tax increases. The income tax reductions amount to roughly $750 million in savings for Georgians, but tax increases on groceries, tobacco, communications services, the Internet and other services approach $2 billion. ATR believes that tax reform is a noble goal, but not when it constitutes a net revenue increase for state government.

ATR President Grover Norquist issued the following statement:

“In its current form, last week’s tax reform proposal should be a non-starter for fiscal conservatives in the Georgia Legislature. While tax reform is indeed a laudable goal, it should not be presented in a way that increases the net burden on taxpayers and raises even more money for state government. Unfortunately, this report recommends just that.

“A significant reduction in marginal tax rates is long overdue in Georgia, which is wedged between two states – Tennessee and Florida – that levy no personal income tax at all. But if the goal is to use such reductions to mask bigger tax increases on groceries, tobacco, and a variety of services, it is not even worthy of a conversation.

“This is akin to shards of glass in a delicious crème brûlée. It is a bit of desirable tax reform ruined by an overall tax hike. Thankfully, Taxpayer Protection Pledge signers run state government in Georgia. Because they have taken tax increases definitively off the table, I am confident that we can move past this initial foray into tax reform and begin a serious conversation about reducing the size and scope of state government in Atlanta.”

Americans for Tax Reform is a non-partisan coalition of taxpayers and taxpayer groups who oppose all tax increases. For more information or to arrange an interview please contact John Kartch at (202) 785-0266 or by email at jkartch@atr.org.
---
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
Facebook: http://facebook.com/ArtsAcrossGA
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

GBPI Releases New Fact Sheet: Income Tax Evens Out the Burden for Families

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:44:00 +0000

The Georgia Budget and Policy Institute (GBPI) released a fact sheet highlighting the attributes of the income tax that make it a good counterweight to sales taxes, especially for families.

The Special Council on Tax Reform and Fairness for Georgians meets today to finalize recommendations before state legislators return on Monday, Jan. 10. Those recommendations will go to a joint House and Senate committee, which will craft legislation for an up or down vote by legislators.

The Council is likely to recommend a shift from the income tax to the sales tax, based on a presentation by Chairman A.D. Frazier in December.

The income tax is an important mechanism for recognizing the different needs of families and vulnerable populations. For example, the income tax excludes a base amount of income per person to ensure we are not taxing the most basic level of income.

Each person in a four person family receives a personal exemption ($5,400 for the parents and $3,000 for each child). A single person receives a $2,700 personal exemption. Thus, a family of four earning $50,000 pays about $1,900 in state income taxes, compared to about $2,500 in income taxes for a single person earning $50,000. In contrast, the sales tax does not recognize that it takes a larger amount of income to provide for more people.

"The state income tax is a tool that allows us to balance some of the negative aspects of the sales tax," said Sarah Beth Gehl, deputy director of the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute. "A dramatic shift from income to sales tax will likely mean middle class families and vulnerable populations will foot more of the bill for state services."

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG @FayetteFP

New Tax Laws Preempt Existing Trusts Tax

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:24:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- Late Friday afternoon, Congress enacted the most sweeping change in the estate tax law in 29 years. The new law contains some good news for the very wealthy, but it also makes most estate plans obsolete. Everyone who has a living trust (family trust) should update it promptly.

Tax lawyer and estate planning expert Robert F. Klueger notes that, "At a minimum, the new law requires every married couple who wrote an estate planning trust to have that trust reviewed, and perhaps modified. If not, many people will learn that their trust doesn't reduce their taxes but can indeed increase their tax liability."

Klueger & Stein, LLP has prepared a short video featuring Robert F. Klueger that reviews the changes to the estate tax law and how it impacts existing estate plans, with suggestions as to how these plans can be modified. The video can be viewed free of charge at http://www.maximumassetprotection.com or http://www.lataxlawyers.com.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

Fed Proposed Debit Interchange Fee Cap Rule Could Have Unintended Consequences for Government Benefit Cards, Flexible Spending Accounts and Reloadable Prepaid Cards

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:45:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- The Network Branded Prepaid Card Association (NBPCA) is concerned that the interchange fee structure and network routing terms announced by the Federal Reserve in its proposed rulemaking will inevitably increase costs to consumers and issuers. Operational flaws, such as requiring prepaid gift cards and flexible spending account cards to include PIN-based debit, not only serve no purpose but also create inefficiencies, increase risk of fraud and unnecessarily raise costs.

Of particular concern to the prepaid card industry is the proposed rules do not clarify how the critical exemptions for government benefit cards and reloadable prepaid cards would be implemented by the card networks under the proposed interchange fee cap rule, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act. This fact was noted during yesterday's meeting, when a Federal Reserve official acknowledged the proposed rule permits but does not require card networks to allow a higher interchange fee for government benefit cards, reloadable cards not marketed as gift, or cards issued by banks with less than $10 billion in revenue. The official added if it becomes problematic for the card networks to implement the exemptions, then the lower interchange rate would apply.

"At a time of historic economic hardship, millions of Americans rely upon government benefit cards and reloadable prepaid cards as a secure, convenient, non-stigmatizing payment tool to make everyday purchases," said Kirsten Trusko, NBPCA President and Executive Director.

"NBPCA looks forward to submitting comments to the Federal Reserve and hopes it will clarify how exemptions will be handled in its final rule. Failure to do so could reduce the availability of prepaid cards, resulting in a catastrophic impact on consumers and governments," added Trusko

Financial institutions offer government benefit cards to states at little to no cost because they receive revenue primarily from the debit interchange. Nearly every state in the nation (47 states) either uses prepaid cards or is in the process of setting up programs to administer a variety of benefits, such as unemployment and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) to millions of needy Americans.

The US Treasury dispenses Social Security benefits through its Direct Express government benefit card. Not only do states save money from check related costs, which is critical at a time when states are experiencing huge budget deficits, but consumers benefit from receiving their funds more efficiently and quickly through this electronic payment tool. Without the exemption from the lower debit interchange fee, it is likely banks will be forced to reduce or eliminate the availability of government benefit cards to nearly every state in the nation.

Millions of unbanked and underbanked individuals also rely upon prepaid cards to participate in our card based economy. It is quite probable if these cards aren't exempted from the interchange fee cap, prepaid card users will be subject to merchant minimums for credit cards because clerks could confuse the cards with credit cards and deny prepaid cardholders from making basic purchases like milk and eggs.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

Study: Recession Will Cost Baby Boomers Up To $40,000 in Social Security Benefits

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:45:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- Baby Boomers will see greatly reduced Social Security benefits over the course of their retirements due to an unprecedented combination of low wage growth and no annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLA), according to a new study by The Senior Citizens League. And those who first become eligible for Social Security in 2011 will receive lower benefits than retirees born a year earlier.

This is the most comprehensive study ever released to show the recession's impact on Social Security benefits for the first wave of baby boomers.

It found that the combination of rapidly slowing wage growth and no COLA is shrinking the normal increases in initial retirement benefits. An inequity will also be created: people born in 1949 (who turn 62 next year) will receive lower benefits than retirees with similar work histories born just one year earlier. Moreover, the lack of a COLA will reduce lifetime Social Security benefits by as much as $40,000 for many retirees with average earning histories (reductions will be felt regardless of the age at which people begin claiming benefits, and some higher-earning seniors stand to lose even more).

Recent wage and consumer price trends – two of the key factors in determining Social Security benefits – have combined to form a "perfect storm" for the first wave of Baby Boomers. Since the start of the recession, average wage growth has plummeted, and there will be no COLA in 2011 for the second year in a row.

Under normal economic conditions, the initial benefits of each succeeding birth year tend to be slightly higher than the previous birth year as wages rise over time. But average wage growth has been slowing since the 1980s and has dropped markedly since 2008.

Furthermore, low inflation (a situation that government economists expect to continue) led to no COLA in 2010 and 2011. The loss of the compounding effect of a COLA on lifetime benefits is high, and grows the longer a senior spends in retirement. Seniors who turn 62 during the years of no COLA are hit with the full brunt of the compounding loss and stand to lose the most.

Aggravating the situation is the fact that, although general inflation is low, seniors' living costs have increased, especially due to rising Medicare premiums.

Lifetime Social Security Benefits an Average Senior Will Lose Due to No/Low COLAs(1)

Year of Birth	62-Year-Old Retiree	66-Year-Old Retiree
1946	-$30,163.60	-$39,152.50
1947	-$31,436.10	-$39,463.20
1948	-$20,871.00	-$26,130.60
1949	-$8,908.90	-$11,141.30
1950	-$2,229.20	-$2,880.90
1951	-$463.00	-$648.70

(1) Low COLA is defined as less than 2.8 percent, which is the average COLA paid from 1975 through 2009. This chart shows how much low or no COLA will affect benefits over a 20-year (for those retiring at age 66) or 25 year (for those retiring at age 62) retirement.

"Large numbers of seniors will be at risk of outliving their retirement income and being pushed into poverty due to an unprecedented combination of economic factors," said Larry Hyland, chairman of The Senior Citizens League. "The Senior Citizens League is adamantly opposed to deficit reduction proposals that would cut COLAs. Instead, Congress needs to pass an emergency COLA provision or guarantee a minimum average COLA to prevent this disturbing erosion in Social Security benefits."

The Senior Citizens League also recommends that any legislation that changes how Social Security benefits are calculated is devised in a way that is fair to all, to prevent inequities between retirees close in age.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

Consumer Reports Index: Worried Consumers May Make Reluctant Shoppers During Final Weeks of December

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:52:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- While retail spending was strong this November, consumers are feeling the pain of a weak employment picture and increased financial troubles. Americans are showing signs of waning confidence, increased stress and reluctance to spend more in December than a year ago, according to the Consumer Reports Index December report.

The Consumer Reports Retail Index showed that the Past 30-Day Retail Index for December, reflective of November activity, was 12.4, up from both the prior month (10.9) and one year ago (11.2). But with just two weeks left to go in the holiday shopping season, the Consumer Reports Index offers some troubling signs for retailers. The Next 30-Day Retail Index for December (reflecting planned December activity) is down slightly (11.8) versus a year ago (12.2). This was led by the soft performance of planned purchasing of personal electronics relative to last year (27.8% versus 32.9%, respectively).

"Despite all the talk and media attention about positive economic growth, consumers are telling us that they are not seeing or, more importantly, not feeling the difference," said Ed Farrell, a director of the Consumer Reports National Research Center. "The consumer may not be confident enough to continue spending through the holiday season. It may require deep discounting from retailers to get consumers back to the store in the final weeks of December."

After five straight months of improvement, the Consumer Reports Trouble Tracker Index points to an increase in consumer financial difficulties (e.g. missed major bills, job loss, loss of health-care coverage) and is up this month to 52.7 from 49.3 the prior month, but well below one year ago (62.0).

The Consumer Reports Employment Index is down in December to 49.2 from 50.3 in November, and is on par with one year ago (48.9), bringing to a halt three months of modest gains. December's Employment Index is indicative of an economy shedding more jobs than it is creating. In the past 30 days, the proportion of Americans that have lost their job has increased to 7.4% from 4.9% a month earlier. Past 30-day job losses are at their highest level since June (8.6%).

The Consumer Reports Index report, available at www.ConsumerReports.org , comprises five key indices: the Sentiment Index, the Trouble Tracker Index, the Stress Index, the Retail Index, and the Employment Index. Here are the key findings:

Consumer Reports Sentiment Index : 45.1*

The Consumer Reports Sentiment Index (45.1) has slipped slightly from the prior month (46.6), but is up slightly from one year ago (41.8). Sentiment has doggedly refused to enter positive territory (over 50) since it was first measured by the Consumer Reports Index on October 5, 2008 and stood at 45.3.

* The most optimistic consumers: Age 18-34 – 53.5, (down from 58.4 the prior month) and those with household incomes $100,000 or more – 54.5, even with prior month (55.1).
* The most pessimistic consumers: Households with income less than $50,000 (40.2, down slightly from the prior month at 42.2), and consumers age 65 and older (38.7, little changed from a month earlier at 38.4).

* The Consumer Reports Sentiment Index captures respondents' attitudes regarding their financial situation, asking them if they are feeling better or worse off than a year ago. When the index is greater than 50, more consumers are feeling positive about their situation. When it is below 50, more consumers are feeling worse. The Sentiment Index can vary from a high of 100 to a low of 0.

Consumer Reports Retail Index : Past 30-Day 12.4, Next 30-Day – 11.8*

* The Past 30-Day Retail Index for December (reflective of November activity) is 12.4, up from the prior month (10.9), as well as a year ago (11.2). December's Next 30-Day Retail Index (planned purchases for December), is at 11.8, up substantially from last month (8.0), but is slightly trailing last year at this time (12.2).
* Looking in detail at the categories comprising the Past 30-Day Retail Index* gains were attributable to an uptick in small appliance sales versus the prior month (21.8% versus 16.7%, respectively); gains in home electronics, up to 15.0% from 11.8% a month earlier; and personal electronics (26.2), up substantially from the prior month (19.6). Versus one year ago, sales in the past 30-days were up for home electronics (15.0%) versus 11.9% last year; and for major appliances (8.1%), up from 6.8% a year ago.
* The gain in the Next 30-Day Retail Index* for December, reflective of December activity, was attributable to an increase in planned purchasing of personal electronics (27.8%), up from 18.2% a month earlier; and a gain in planned purchasing for home electronics (16.5%) versus the prior month (10.0%). Compared to last year, however, planned purchasing of personal electronics was down for this December, 27.8% versus 32.9%, respectively.

* The Consumer Reports Retail Index looks at consumer purchases in the past 30 days as well as the outlook for planned purchases in the next 30 days across several categories. The Consumer Reports Retail Index represents the proportion of respondents that made a purchase in the following categories: major home appliances, small home appliances, major home electronics, personal electronics, and major yard and garden equipment. The Retail Index is a weighted calculation. For example, a major appliance is of greater value than a small appliance. Because of their size and frequency, car and home purchases are tracked separately.

Consumer Reports Trouble Tracker Index : 52.7

* Consumers faced more troubles than last month, signaling a halt to five months of improvement. The trouble tracker index increased to 52.7 in December, up from November's 49.3, though the Trouble Tracker Index is much improved from one year ago (62.0).
* Negative developments were led by an increase in consumers that lost their job in the past 30 days to 7.4% from 4.9% in November, and an increase in those that have missed a payment on a major bill (not mortgage) to 9.5% from 8.9% a month earlier.
* A sign of the weak jobs market is the proportion of consumers that have lost or face reduced health-care coverage (9.0%), up slightly from last month (8.7%), but up from a year ago (7.9%).
* On the positive side, there were fewer consumers that could not afford medical bills or medications (13.3%) versus last month (14.5%) and one year ago (15.7%). However, the improvement in the proportion that could not afford medical bills or medication may signal a change in behavior, where consumers are availing themselves of medical services less often.
* Overall, the most prevalent consumer troubles include: the inability to afford medical bills or medications (13.3%) missed payment on a major bill – not a mortgage (9.5%), and lost or reduced health-care coverage (9.0%).

* The Consumer Reports Trouble Tracker focuses on both the proportion of consumers that have faced difficulties as well as the number of negative events they have encountered. The negative events include: the inability to pay medical bills or afford medication, missed mortgage payments, home foreclosure, interest-rate increase, penalty fees, reduced lines of credit or other changes in credit-card terms, job loss or layoffs, reduced health-care coverage, or the denial of personal loans. The Consumer Reports Trouble Tracker Index is then calculated as the proportion of consumers that have experienced at least one of the negative events comprising the index multiplied by the average number of events encountered.

Consumer Reports Stress Index : 60.8*

* The level of stress consumers feel they are under is down to 60.8 from 58.5 the prior month, but is below the level from one year ago (63.0).

* The Consumer Reports Stress Index captures attitudes regarding the amount of stress consumers feel compared to a year ago. It asks whether they are feeling more stressed or less stressed. When the Stress Index is more than 50, consumers are feeling more stress and when it is below 50 they are feeling less stress compared to a year ago. The index can vary from 100 (Total Stress) to a low of 0 (No Stress).

Consumer Reports Employment Index : 49.2*

Regionally, the Northeast is doing slightly better this month, led by declining consumer stress and improved retail activity. The North, Central and South have declined slightly as a result of increased consumer economic difficulties and a decline in Consumer Sentiment.

* The Consumer Reports Employment Index examines the change in employment of those that reported starting a new job versus those that have lost their job or were laid off in the past 30 days. An index below 50 indicates more jobs were lost than gained, while a score more than 50 indicates more jobs were gained than lost in the past 30 days.

For more information regarding the Consumer Reports Index, visit www.ConsumerReports.org .

The Consumer Reports Index, conducted by the Consumer Reports National Research Center, is a monthly telephone and cell phone poll of a nationally representative probability sample of American adults. A total of 1,263 interviews were completed (1,013 telephone and 250 cell phone) among adults aged 18+. Interviewing took place between December 2 and December 5, 2010. The margin of error is +/- 2.8 points at a 95% confidence level. The complete index report, methodology, and tabular information are available.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

New Research from EBRI: Health Law Cut Some Health Costs in Retirement, But Retirees Will Need Big Savings

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:28:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- Even though the new health reform law will reduce some health costs in retirement for many people, retirees will still need a significant amount of savings to cover their out-of-pocket health expenses when they retire, according to a report released today by the nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI). Women in particular will need more savings than men because they tend to live longer.

For instance, EBRI finds that men retiring in this year (2010) at age 65 will need anywhere from $65,000–$109,000 in savings to cover health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses in retirement if they want a 50–50 chance of being able to have enough money; to improve the odds to 90 percent, they'll need between $124,000–$211,000.

Women retiring this year at 65 will need even more: between $88,000–$146,000 in savings if they are comfortable with a 50 percent chance of having enough money, and $143,000–$242,000 if they want a 90 per-cent chance.

These estimates are for Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older: Anyone retiring early, before age 65, would need even more.

The new EBRI analysis details how much savings an individual or couple will need to cover Medicare and out-of-pocket health care expenses in retirement, updating earlier EBRI simulation results from 2008. Some prior estimates have been significantly revised downward as a result of changes to Medicare Part D (prescription drug) cost sharing that will be phased in by 2020 due to the recently enacted health reform law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA).

However, EBRI finds that retirees will continue to need a substantial amount of savings to cover their health care expenses in retirement, and that uncertainty related to health care use, prescription drug use, and longevity will still play a major role in planning for retiree health care. Results are shown by the desired level of probability (50, 75, and 90 percent) of having enough savings to cover health costs in retirement.

The full report is titled "Funding Savings Needed for Health Expenses for Persons Eligible for Medicare," and is published in the December 2010 EBRI Issue Brief, online at www.ebri.org

"Because employers are continuing to scale back retiree health benefits, and policymakers may soon begin to address Medicare's funding shortfall, more of the financial costs of health care will be shifted to Medicare beneficiaries in the future," said Paul Fronstin, director of EBRI's Health Research and Education Program, and a co-author of the report.

Dallas Salisbury, EBRI CEO and also a co-author of the report, noted that "many workers are generally unprepared for both health care expenses in retirement and retirement expenses. In fact, many individuals will need more money than the amounts cited in this report," since the analysis deliberately does not factor in the savings needed to cover long-term care expenses or the fact that many people retire prior to becoming eligible for Medicare.

EBRI notes that in 2007 (the most recent data available), Medicare covered 64 percent of the cost of health care services for Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older, while retirees' out-of-pocket spending accounted for 14 percent. Private insurance and various other government programs covered the remaining 12 percent of costs.

Among the key findings of the EBRI analysis:

* Single men: Men retiring at age 65 in 2010 will need anywhere from $65,000 to $109,000 in savings to cover health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses, if they want an average (50–50) chance of being able to have enough money. If they want a 90 percent chance of having enough to cover these expenses, they'll need between $124,000 to $211,000.
* Single women: Women retiring at age 65 in 2010 will need anywhere from $88,000 to $146,000 in savings to cover health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses for a 50 percent chance of having enough money, and $143,000 to $242,000 if they prefer a 90 percent chance.
* The near-elderly: Persons currently at age 55 will need even greater savings when they turn 65 in 2020. The needed savings for men retiring in 2020 range from $111,000 to $354,000, while needed savings for women range from $147,000 to $406,000 (in 2020 dollars), depending on their source of health insurance coverage to supplement Medicare, any employer subsidies, prescription drug use, and their savings goal related to their comfort level with having a 50 percent, 75 percent, or 90 percent chance of having enough savings to cover health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket health care expenses in retirement.

EBRI is a private, nonprofit research institute based in Washington, DC, that focuses on health, savings, retirement, and economic security issues. EBRI does not lobby and does not take policy positions.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

Watch Out for Black Friday, Cyber Monday: Having Holiday Shopping Smarts Will Pay Off in Time and Money

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:30:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- Are you tired of the holidays yet? It's been a winter wonderland in most stores for weeks and prospective shoppers are being bombarded with special deals and offers earlier and more frequently than in past seasons. Retailers are trying to get more consumers in the stores than last year, so deals aren't just happening on one day.

With the increased competition for still limited dollars, the Illinois CPA Society says being aware of the tactics used to lure shoppers will help you spend your time and money wisely. Use this broader shopping season to your advantage – have a strategy, compare prices and stick to a budget. Here's what you'll need to watch out for:

* Black Friday "Month." No longer is there one day designated for kicking off the holiday season. Some stores have already started touting "Black Friday" sales; others will be open on Thanksgiving Day to offer Black Thursday night deals. Shopping can be fun and entertaining, but don't take every opportunity to shop and don't make impulse purchases (especially for yourself).
* Return Policies. If you're shopping early, make sure to read the fine print. Many stores have strict new return policies, especially during the holiday season. If a store won't allow anything to be returned after 30 days, you may want to hold off on purchasing until closer to the date you plan to give it to the recipient. Get gift receipts and keep in mind personal information may be requested on returns. Stores are being more restrictive on return policies and keeping close tabs on return records to prevent fraud.
* Store Credit Cards. If you already have a card from your favorite retailer, see if there are special discounts on Black Friday and the surrounding days. If you're making a large purchase, it may be worth it to open a card for the day, get the discount and immediately pay off the balance. Think twice about opening any new accounts if you can't pay off the balance; they often come with steep interest rates and your holiday savings will be eaten away in finance charges.
* Rebates. Essentially, rebates are big coupons. Spend the money now, but get it back later. The key is to be diligent about sending them in. Make sure you have receipts and any other proofs of purchase needed to process the rebate. Keep copies of these items since rebate submissions can be lost. Note the date you mail the rebate and read the fine print, especially about the dates for submitting the rebate and the time frame you have to purchase the rebate item. Although you're not necessarily saving money immediately upon purchase, think of a rebate as a gift to yourself come January – when the credit card bill is actually due.
* Cyber Monday/Online Shopping. Retailers are making greater use of email, mobile phone apps and texts. They want shopping to be as easy and convenient as possible so you spend as much as possible. Don't get carried away and think before you click. Use those special offers you get through email alerts, but be choosy in giving out contact information so you're not inundated with too many messages. Make sure personal information, like a credit card number, is provided only on secure sites.
* Bank Credit Cards. Choosing your card wisely could net savings and rewards; using too many cards can leave you in deeper credit card debt. See which cards have the best cash back or bonus point offers, which stores and purchases they apply to, and if there are any limits or restrictions.
* Gift Cards. There's good news and bad news with gift cards. Thanks to new government rules, gift cards must remain valid for at least five years from the purchase date. No fees can be charged for cards that haven't been used in the past 12 months. However, cards won't need to show the expiration date and fee policy information until the end of January. You may also be out of luck if the card's lost or stolen; some cards may also still have inactivity fees. And always watch out for the activation fee on some cards – they effectively lessen the total card value.

According to the Illinois CPA Society, the bottom line is making sure you have a game plan. Ask yourself how you're going to pay for all of this and what amount you're budgeting for the holidays. And do you have a list? Sticking to a list will help keep your spending on budget. If you can, try to make all of your purchases using cash or layaway to keep your post-holiday bills low. Be a smart shopper. It's not necessarily a deal just because the store says so, and it's not a deal if you don't need it or it's more than you want to spend.

If you're looking for a little help with your finances, you can find local deals, finance definitions and tips on managing your money on the Society's Twitter consumer resource, @thriftitude.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

Georgians' Holiday Spending Plans Reflect Current Consumer Mindset

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:37:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ -- While not pulling back to Scrooge-ish extremes, Georgia merchants may again face cautious shoppers this holiday season, according to the latest poll from Georgia Credit Union Affiliates (GCUA).

While about half (52.8 percent) of nearly 6,000 credit union members surveyed statewide said they plan to spend about the same as last year, 44.3 percent indicated that they plan to spend less on the holiday season than in 2009. This statistic appears to reflect a continued trend in austerity around gift-giving, given that 51.2 percent of respondents to GCUA's survey in 2009 said they planned to spend less on the holidays than the previous year.

Backing up the latest poll numbers, data from 39 credit unions statewide shows Georgia consumers have a penchant for bolstering their account balances. During the first nine months of 2010, savings deposits grew by 6.3 percent and checking account balances increased by 11.4 percent.

The poll results and credit union data are included in the latest "Paying Attention" report from GCUA, gauging the mindset of Georgia consumers on economic and personal finance. The report also recaps quarterly lending and saving statistics from credit unions statewide.

"Shoppers who already trimmed their spending in 2009 will be frugal again this year," said Mike Mercer, president and CEO of GCUA. "The poll results appear to bear that out, with just 2.9 percent of respondents saying they plan to spend more this holiday season."

Overall, the poll found that:

* 52.8 percent plan to spend about the same this holiday season as last year, while 44.2 percent plan on spending less. Only 2.9 percent plan on spending more this holiday season than last year.
o In 2009, 51.2 percent said they planned to spend less than the previous year while 45.4 percent planned to spend about the same. 3 percent expected to spend more in 2009 compared to the year before.
* Most shoppers still plan to spend modest amounts on gifts. 43.9 percent of respondents are planning to spend between $100 and $500 while 28.7 percent are planning to spend between $500 and $1,000. In a true turn toward austerity, 16.4 percent said they plan to spend less than $100 in total on gifts this year; conversely, 11 percent plan to spend more than $1,000.
o Last year, 47.9 percent said they planned on spending between $100 and $500 in total, 30.8 percent planned on spending between $500 and $1,000 and 11.4 percent said they were going to spend less than $100, and 9.9 percent planned on spending more than $1,000.
* The majority of respondents (77.8 percent) are planning to pay mostly or completely by cash compared to 17.3 percent who plan to pay using a credit card. 4.9 percent plan to use savings from a Christmas club account or other means.
o In 2009, 75.6 percent said they planned on paying all or mostly by cash compared to 11.8 percent who planned on paying all or mostly by credit card. 12.7 percent said they would pay with savings from a Christmas club account or other means.

Credit Union Data Shows Continued Trend Toward Savings

In addition to the consumer poll, GCUA compiled data from 39 credit unions from across the state representing 90 percent of credit union assets and 82 percent of members in Georgia to gauge current lending and savings trends. The data compare year-to-date figures from the first nine months of 2010 to the same period in 2009. Summarized below, the findings indicate a continued trend toward savings among consumers, while figures for lending varied (all rates are annualized):

* Compared to the same period last year, savings deposits grew by 6.3 percent during the first nine months of 2010 and by 7.1 percent over the past year.
* Checking account balances increased by 11.4 percent between January and September and by 16.5 percent over a 12-month period.
* Money market account balances grew by 23.8 percent during the first three quarters of the year and by 35.6 percent over the previous 12 months.
* New vehicle loan balances decreased by 9.7 percent over the past year; however, balances for used car loans increased more than 7.7 percent in the first nine months of 2010, and 10 percent over the past 12 months.
* First mortgage balances increased by 5.8 percent during between January and September and by 12.5 percent over a 12-month period.
* The number of bankruptcy filings among members rose by 13.8 percent over the past 12 months.

"Credit union members represent a good cross section of middle-class Georgians," Mercer said. "Our latest report shows that Georgia consumers seem to be settling into a routine of conscious saving and cautious spending."

More information is available at www.georgiacreditunions.org or on www.facebook.com/creditYOUnion.

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

Will Small Business Jobs Act Boost Economic Growth?

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:53:00 +0000

The recently enacted Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 fulfills a promise U.S. President Barack Obama made to entrepreneurs soon after his election, pledging to create incentives aimed at encouraging small-business creation and growth.

Many experts agree that the package of finance and tax incentives represents some good news for small businesses struggling to cope with weak economic conditions. Although some faculty at Emory University and its Goizueta Business School and other observers praise the new initiative, others wonder if it will have the necessary impact to help jump-start the economy.

"Until now, large companies have been the biggest beneficiaries of stimulus programs and tax incentives," says Thomas Smith, an assistant professor in the practice of finance at Goizueta. "The accelerated tax write-offs featured in the new act are a good idea, since they’re aimed at incentivizing businesses to make capital purchases that can have a ripple effect throughout the economy."

Among other changes under the Small Business Jobs Act, companies can reduce their taxable income by immediately expensing the costs of certain kinds of newly acquired business assets, instead of depreciating them over their "useful life," a period of years determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Generally, companies like to expense their assets quickly as a way to significantly reduce their tax liability.

The asset write-offs, popularly known as Section 179 after the applicable part of the Internal Revenue Code, were previously limited to $250,000 in a given year. The new act raises the threshold to $500,000 of newly purchased assets per year, subject to certain limitations, during 2010 and 2011.

In another bid to get businesses to spend more, the act extends and revises the so-called bonus depreciation rules, which let taxpayers depreciate 50 percent of the cost of certain assets in the first year they are placed in service.

An earlier set of bonus depreciation rules expired at the end of 2009, but the new act extends it to assets placed in service through the end of 2010, and certain assets may qualify even if they are purchased and put into service through 2011.

Some observers have questioned the timing of the legislation, suggesting that few small business owners will risk making significant capital expenditures during the current downturn. They also complain that the bonus depreciation rules, while welcome, have such a limited timeframe that few businesses will not have enough time to plan and get financing for the capital purchases.

Smith, however, isn’t so sure about that.

"The fact is that machinery and equipment is either wearing out—or, in the case of computers and other technology-based assets—is becoming obsolete," he says. "Businesses that want to stay competitive aren’t likely to hold off on necessary purchases just because the economic recovery isn’t moving as quickly as they hoped. Obama’s responses to the recession may not all be perfect, but he’s moving in the right direction."

If Smith was hedging on his view of the tax incentives, another Obama initiative has his full support.

"I think the tax incentives were a good idea, but the $30 billion that’s being released to banks to stimulate small-business lending is even better," he says. "Many small business owners I’ve spoken with have complained that they’ve wanted to take advantage of expansion and other opportunities, but simply couldn’t get loans to finance their plan."

Besides replacing aging assets, some business want to upgrade to more efficient machinery and equipment that can reduce their operating and other costs, adds Smith.

"It’s difficult to say with certainty exactly what the catalyst to spur business activity will be," Smith observes. "But we’ve got to try bold, new initiatives like these, as well as other strategies, to incentivize businesses to start hiring again. To do nothing would be myopic."

Perhaps, but this economy presents some unique challenges, says T. Clifton Green, an associate finance professor at Goizueta.

"Although the recession is officially over, we seem to be having the jobless recovery that people feared, in that unemployment is still very high," notes Green. "The idea behind the $30 billion government bank-loan program and the tax credit initiative is to get small businesses spending to expand their businesses and hire new people."

But large companies can easily borrow at historically low rates, "and they are not using the money to expand," he adds. "Rather than hiring, they're using new debt to buy back stock or replace old technology that they held off replacing during the recession. The recent behavior of large business suggests the small business act may not have the intended new hiring effect."

Indeed, William J. Carney, a chaired professor of corporate law at Emory, stresses that another administration initiative, healthcare reform, may have already undermined any benefit the Small Business Jobs Act may have provided.

"Congress meant well by pushing businesses to provide healthcare insurance," he says. "But it could be counterproductive to hiring, especially among low-wage employers who don't want to take on "Cadillac" insurance programs for minimum-wage workers. We've already seen pushback from McDonald's Corp. and other big employers that complained and are getting limited waivers."

Yet New York City entrepreneur and Goizueta graduate Brett Klasko believes that more credit access could boost businesses.

"Opening up the lending channels is a good idea," says Klasko, chief executive officer of the marketing firm Phinaz whose subsidiaries, Ticket Boosterand Investors Alley, focus on the sports and financial industries, respectively.

"The additional federal funding could give banks an incentive to lend," he adds.

If the effectiveness of this program and others is in debate, then how—or if—such legislation can stimulate a positive response with voters in the midterm elections is even murkier.

"I don’t know if this program and others will really help the Democrats much in the midterm elections," notes Klasko. "For example, the president has been pushing to let some or all of the Bush-era tax cuts expire, and I don’t think that’s a good idea, since it will end up hurting businesses."

Obama may hope that the administration’s most recent stimulus effort will help Democrats in the November elections, but Goizueta finance professor Tarun Chordia does not believe it will help the economy much.

"The act, like the previous "cash for clunkers" and "homebuyers’ incentive," might just move some activity forward," he says. "It might not really create new activity, and we’ll suffer the aftereffects later on."

In contrast to these "small fixes," there’s a real need to upgrade infrastructure, says Chordia. "We currently have spare capacity in the economy, and it is important that the right projects are funded. There is a large debate in economics between those who feel that government spending on infrastructure projects during downturns can help future GDP growth and those who feel that government spending is generally wasteful. It is probably true that projects funded for political reasons, just before the November elections, are likely to be wasteful.

Chordia believes that big issues like the hangover in the housing market will take at least two or three years to resolve, regardless of what the federal government does.

"This recession is different than past slumps," explains Chordia. "In this one, we’ve seen a broad retreat in asset prices, and it will take time to get supply and demand back into balance. At this point the motivation for the stimulus programs seems to be the November election."

From Knowledge@Emory

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

The Return of the Holiday Layaway

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:03:00 +0000

/PRNewswire/ --Layaway may sound like an old-school concept, especially in today's "buy now, pay later" society. But the idea of setting aside products to pay for gradually is making a comeback, and is a great alternative to using credit cards this upcoming holiday season.

"The credit card allows shoppers to buy on impulse without the immediate worry of how to pay for their purchases," said Dorothy Guzek , GreenPath Debt Solutions financial counselor. "Unfortunately, when the credit card bill comes due, consumers are left with a surprise balance they can't afford to pay, because they forgot to keep track of each purchase."

Layaway may be the answer for those who can't afford to pay all at once or who simply want to avoid using credit cards this holiday season. An added benefit is that layaway helps keep prying eyes from gifts and presents before the big holiday celebration.

"Our customers are looking for ways to better manage their spending, while still getting the items they need and want," said Salima Yala , Divisional Vice President of Financial Services for Sears Holdings. "Layaway is a financial tool, much like an interest-free payment plan, that allows them to pay over a set period of time."

In addition to traditional in-store layaway, stores like K-Mart and Sears are offering online layaway programs. Online layaway lets you browse and shop for items on the web, pay over time just as you would with traditional layaway, and then pick up the merchandise in-store.

"Layaway provides customers with innovative ways to shop – and with the launch of online layaway, the younger generation of online shoppers are able to manage their budgets, and shopping needs, in a smarter way," said Yala.

GreenPath Debt Solutions offers the following tips for buying on layaway:

1. Get a copy of the store's layaway policies and staple it to your receipt. You may also find layaway policies on the store's website.
2. Make sure you understand the policies such as schedule of payments, late fee policies, refund and exchange policies, markdowns on sale prices and loss or damage of items while in layaway.
3. Be realistic in what you can afford over time and what you put on layaway.
4. Keep clear and accurate records of payments made (staple them to the original receipt and layaway policy statement) in case you have disputes later.
5. When going to the store to make a payment, use the direct in-out method. Walk into the store and directly to the layaway counter to make the payment and then walk back out to your car. Avoid the urge to shop. Preferably, make your layaway payment online and avoid the stores altogether.
6. Don't forget that, until you pay off the items in layaway, the store has your money and merchandise. If the store goes out of business while you're still paying, you could be out both the cash and goods. So only deal with reputable businesses.

Other stores offering layaway this holiday season include Sears, T.J. Maxx, Burlington Coat Factory, Marshalls and Toys R Us, among others. You many find more stores by searching the Internet.

GreenPath's Guzek reminds shoppers, "Regardless of how you decide to shop this holiday season, make a budget in advance, shop from a list, track your expenses and stick with your original plan."

-----
Community News You Can Use
Click to read MORE news:
www.GeorgiaFrontPage.com
Twitter: @gafrontpage & @TheGATable @HookedonHistory
www.ArtsAcrossGeorgia.com
Twitter: @artsacrossga, @softnblue, @RimbomboAAG
www.FayetteFrontPage.com
Twitter: @FayetteFP

In 15 of Last 25 Months, Treasury Needed to Borrow Money to Pay Social Security Benefits

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:45:00 +0000

(CNSNews.com) - The U.S. Treasury has needed to borrow money to pay Social Security benefits in 15 out of the last 25 months on record because the Social Security system was in deficit in those months, with the cost of monthly benefit payments exceeding the Social Security tax revenues flowing into the Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance trust funds, according to data published by the Social Security Administration.In 15 of Last 25 Months, Treasury Needed to Borrow Money to Pay Social Security Benefits

More Pension Shortfalls...

noreply@blogger.com (Georgia Front Page.com) — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:03:00 +0000

Report warns of coming wave of municipal pension shortfalls

By Michael A. Fletcher Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, October 12, 2010; 12:12 AM

The nation's largest municipal pension plans are carrying a total unfunded liability of $574 billion, which comes on top of as much as $3 trillion in unfunded pension promises made by the states, according to a report released Tuesday.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/12/AR2010101200044.html?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Heritage%2BHotsheet&hpid=moreheadlines