<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>FDALegislativeWatch</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-535794</id>
    <updated>2008-10-20T16:18:00-04:00</updated>
    <subtitle>Current about FDA legislative developments including follow-on biologics, drug safety, patent reform, PDUFA and MDUFMA</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Fdalegislativewatch" type="application/atom+xml" /><entry>
        <title>FDA Legislative Watch Special Update</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/TJqkMDlC8cs/fda-legislative.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/10/fda-legislative.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-57305417</id>
        <published>2008-10-20T16:18:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-20T16:18:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">October 20, 2008 FDA Legislative Watch Special Update: The FDALegislativeWatch.com blog has just gotten better! BioPharma Today takes over where FDALegislativeWatch leaves off, taking the regulatory and legislative coverage of FDALegislativeWatch and adding business strategy, dealmaking, startup news and much...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/TJqkMDlC8cs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/10/fda-legislative.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>U.S. FDA Inspections in China</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/F21JRs0Q1UI/us-fda-inspecti.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/10/us-fda-inspecti.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56491519</id>
        <published>2008-10-03T11:17:54-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-03T11:17:54-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">In 2008, foreign manufacturing sites will exceed domestic ones for U.S. FDA-regulated products for the first time. China has more establishments manufacturing drugs offered for entry into the U.S. than any other country. However, only 11 percent, or 80 of...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/F21JRs0Q1UI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Publisher's Spotlight" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/10/us-fda-inspecti.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Digital Mammography Firms Decry Clinical Trial Provisions In Draft Guidance</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/qS1csaxBGpU/digital-mammogr.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/digital-mammogr.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-55412164</id>
        <published>2008-09-10T10:59:53-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-10T10:59:53-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Digital mammography systems are on the verge of being downclassified to 510(k) status, but imaging firms say the clinical trial requirements proposed in FDA's draft "special controls" guidance for the systems are costly, unnecessary and overly burdensome. Full-field digital mammography...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/qS1csaxBGpU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Medical Devices" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/digital-mammogr.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Medicare Bundling Provisions Could Boost Affymax ESA in ESRD Arena </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/4fbd1UY3y9E/medicare-bundli.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/medicare-bundli.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-55409708</id>
        <published>2008-09-10T10:58:45-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-10T10:58:45-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Affymax sees the end-stage renal disease treatment bundling provisions in the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act as a potential opportunity for its new erythropoiesis stimulating agent to pull market share from Amgen's Epogen. "We expect these changes in...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/4fbd1UY3y9E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/medicare-bundli.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>FDA List Of Potential Safety Signals Has 3 Pfizer Drugs, Echoes Drug Watch Site </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/v-8tOOQLRuk/fda-list-of-pot.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/fda-list-of-pot.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-55408868</id>
        <published>2008-09-10T10:57:07-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-10T10:57:07-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">FDA's quarterly report that lists potential signals of serious risks for drugs is similar in design to a program that the agency proposed and then withdrew following industry criticism. The new quarterly report, announced and posted on FDA's Web site...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/v-8tOOQLRuk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Rx Drug Safety" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/fda-list-of-pot.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Sweeping Changes In India’s Clinical Trial Laws Could Allow Phase I MNC Studies Under Certain Circumstances</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/PHYRdLlycsc/sweeping-change.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/sweeping-change.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-55411464</id>
        <published>2008-09-10T10:36:19-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-10T10:36:19-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">MUMBAI - Conducting clinical trials in India may get a little easier for multinational drug companies. That is because the much-awaited amendments to the contentious "Schedule Y" of India's Drug and Cosmetics Act have moved one step forward. Industry sources...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/PHYRdLlycsc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/sweeping-change.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Physician Payment Disclosure Bill Should Include Other Entities – MedPAC</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/pVlE0FWGXVg/physician-payme.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/physician-payme.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-55409518</id>
        <published>2008-09-10T09:56:28-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-10T09:56:28-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission is recommending a more comprehensive system for reporting pharmaceutical industry payments than the one proposed in legislation pending before Congress. The Physician Payments Sunshine Act, first introduced in the Senate by Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/pVlE0FWGXVg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/physician-payme.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Pregnancy Registries Should Not Be Mandated In Drug Label, Amgen Tells FDA </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/kTF7WSdcGQY/pregnancy-regis.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/pregnancy-regis.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-55124028</id>
        <published>2008-09-04T16:02:11-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-04T16:02:11-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Industry is challenging one of the central components of FDA's proposed rule on pregnancy and lactation labeling - that any existing registries for patients should be included in labeling. From FDA's point of view, including information on pregnancy registries in...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/kTF7WSdcGQY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="FDA Oversight" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/pregnancy-regis.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Marketing Oversight By States Creates Multiple Compliance Standards For Firms </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/t3lcXg4SVxg/marketing-overs.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/marketing-overs.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-55123358</id>
        <published>2008-09-04T15:58:27-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-04T15:58:27-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">As more and more states pass laws that require pharmaceutical companies to disclose payments to health care practitioners, there needs to be a single definition of which data must be reported, according to John Patrick Oroho, executive vice president of...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/t3lcXg4SVxg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="DTC Advertising" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/marketing-overs.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>New Generics Need To Influence Medicare Rates More Quickly – OIG </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~3/ShIB5fMM6B8/new-generics-ne.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/new-generics-ne.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-55124330</id>
        <published>2008-09-04T15:52:21-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-04T15:52:21-04:00</updated>
        <summary type="html">Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General is calling on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to more quickly adjust reimbursement rates for Medicare Part B drugs when low-priced generics enter the market. In a report released August...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fdalegislativewatch/~4/ShIB5fMM6B8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Sean</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Rx Drug Safety" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/09/new-generics-ne.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:dynamic-ssi -->
