<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Feminist Majority Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://feminist.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://feminist.org/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 20:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>New Taliban Law Legalizes Child Marriage and Further Restricts Women’s Rights</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/new-taliban-law-legalizes-child-marriage-and-further-restricts-womens-rights/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FMF Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Womens Rights]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A newly published Taliban family law regulation is further institutionalizing discrimination and oppression against Afghan women and girls by codifying unequal rights in marriage, divorce, and family matters. The law also effectively removes Afghanistan’s previous minimum marriage age for girls by linking eligibility for marriage to puberty, which can begin as early as age nine. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/new-taliban-law-legalizes-child-marriage-and-further-restricts-womens-rights/">New Taliban Law Legalizes Child Marriage and Further Restricts Women’s Rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none yarpp-template-list'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic Women’s Caucus Leads New Effort to Address Sexual Misconduct in Congress</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/democratic-womens-caucus-leads-new-effort-to-address-sexual-misconduct-in-congress/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madelyn Amos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 17:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Following the resignation of two members of Congress for sexual misconduct, the Democratic Women’s Caucus (DWC) has launched a new initiative to reform the predatory environment of Capitol Hill. A bipartisan effort, Democratic Women’s Caucus Chair Teresa Leger Fernández (NM-03) and Republican Women’s Caucus Chair Kat Cammack (FL-03) are taking the lead and had a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/democratic-womens-caucus-leads-new-effort-to-address-sexual-misconduct-in-congress/">Democratic Women’s Caucus Leads New Effort to Address Sexual Misconduct in Congress</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-template-list'>
<!-- YARPP List -->
<h3>Related posts:</h3><ol>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/virginias-bill-will-finally-give-survivors-justice/" rel="bookmark" title="Virginia’s Bill Will Finally Give Survivors Justice">Virginia’s Bill Will Finally Give Survivors Justice</a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rising Gas, Rising Bills: The Gendered Economic Impact of the Iran War</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/rising-gas-rising-bills-the-gendered-economic-impact-of-the-iran-war/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madelyn Amos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As the United States becomes increasingly entangled in military conflict with Iran, the costs are not only being felt overseas. At home, the economic consequences are hitting American households hard, and women, particularly single mothers, are bearing the brunt.&#160; On February 28, the U.S. and Israel killed Iran’s supreme leader. That same day, a primary [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/rising-gas-rising-bills-the-gendered-economic-impact-of-the-iran-war/">Rising Gas, Rising Bills: The Gendered Economic Impact of the Iran War</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none yarpp-template-list'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Refusing to be Erased&#8221;: Bonnie Thornton Dill on Feminist Resistance in Higher Education</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/refusing-to-be-erased-bonnie-thornton-dill-on-feminist-resistance-in-higher-education/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madelyn Amos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 17:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYFLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's and gender studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Editor’s note:&#160;The following is the transcript of a speech (lightly edited for length and clarity) given by Bonnie Thornton Dill, former President of the National Women’s Studies Association, at the 2026 National Young Feminist Leadership Conference. Good morning. Thank you all for being here and thank you Kathy, Ellie, and FMF for organizing this event.&#160; [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/refusing-to-be-erased-bonnie-thornton-dill-on-feminist-resistance-in-higher-education/">&#8220;Refusing to be Erased&#8221;: Bonnie Thornton Dill on Feminist Resistance in Higher Education</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none yarpp-template-list'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rules to Protect Access to Medication Abortion</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/supreme-court-rules-to-protect-access-to-medication-abortion/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madelyn Amos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion pills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mifepristone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, May 14, the Supreme Court voted 7-2 to preserve access to the abortion pill mifepristone through telehealth and mail delivery, at least for now. The ruling blocked a decision from the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals that would have restricted access by requiring patients to obtain the medication through in-person visits. The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/supreme-court-rules-to-protect-access-to-medication-abortion/">Supreme Court Rules to Protect Access to Medication Abortion</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-template-list'>
<!-- YARPP List -->
<h3>Related posts:</h3><ol>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/shield-laws-vs-vigilante-lawsuits-the-new-abortion-battleground/" rel="bookmark" title="Shield Laws vs. Vigilante Lawsuits: The New Abortion Battleground">Shield Laws vs. Vigilante Lawsuits: The New Abortion Battleground</a></li>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/the-clean-water-for-all-life-act-policing-bodies-not-protecting-water/" rel="bookmark" title="The Clean Water for All Life Act: Policing Bodies, Not Protecting Water">The Clean Water for All Life Act: Policing Bodies, Not Protecting Water</a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effects Beyond Reproductive Care: The Backlash of Overturning Roe</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/effects-beyond-reproductive-care-the-backlash-of-overturning-roe/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madelyn Amos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The overturning of Roe v. Wade has caused major issues for women and pregnant-able bodies all around the country. It has forced unwanted pregnancies, increased the number of children in foster care, and has caused women to pursue unsafe abortion alternatives.  New research, published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, shows that people are [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/effects-beyond-reproductive-care-the-backlash-of-overturning-roe/">Effects Beyond Reproductive Care: The Backlash of Overturning Roe</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-template-list'>
<!-- YARPP List -->
<h3>Related posts:</h3><ol>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/shield-laws-vs-vigilante-lawsuits-the-new-abortion-battleground/" rel="bookmark" title="Shield Laws vs. Vigilante Lawsuits: The New Abortion Battleground">Shield Laws vs. Vigilante Lawsuits: The New Abortion Battleground</a></li>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/urgent-care-clinic-in-michigan-fills-gaps-in-abortion-access/" rel="bookmark" title="Urgent Care Clinic in Michigan Fills Gaps in Abortion Access">Urgent Care Clinic in Michigan Fills Gaps in Abortion Access</a></li>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/doj-targets-face-act-while-anti-abortion-violence-rises/" rel="bookmark" title="DOJ Targets FACE Act While Anti-Abortion Violence Rises">DOJ Targets FACE Act While Anti-Abortion Violence Rises</a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminist Leaders Speak Out Against the Supreme Court’s Devastating Blow to the Voting Rights Act of 1965</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/feminist-leaders-speak-out-against-the-supreme-courts-devastating-blow-to-the-voting-rights-act/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madelyn Amos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting rights]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 29, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to decimate protections under the Voting Rights Act, one of the nation’s most important civil rights laws. The case, Louisiana v. Callais, centers on how states consider race when drawing legislative districts to comply with voting rights protections. In its ruling, the Court concluded that race [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/feminist-leaders-speak-out-against-the-supreme-courts-devastating-blow-to-the-voting-rights-act/">Feminist Leaders Speak Out Against the Supreme Court’s Devastating Blow to the Voting Rights Act of 1965</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-template-list'>
<!-- YARPP List -->
<h3>Related posts:</h3><ol>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/from-privacy-to-conversion-therapy-a-troubling-month-for-lgbtq-rights-at-the-supreme-court/" rel="bookmark" title="From Privacy to Conversion Therapy: A Troubling Month for LGBTQ+ Rights at the Supreme Court">From Privacy to Conversion Therapy: A Troubling Month for LGBTQ+ Rights at the Supreme Court</a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Judiciary Hearing Targets FACE Act Despite Rising Threats to Clinics</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/house-judiciary-hearing-targets-face-act-despite-rising-threats-to-clinics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madelyn Amos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antiabortion violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACE Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88570</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 28, the House Committee on the Judiciary convened a hearing on the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, following a Department of Justice report alleging FACE was “weaponized” under the Biden administration. Subcommittee chair Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), who introduced legislation to repeal FACE in January, presided. Enacted in 1994, FACE [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/house-judiciary-hearing-targets-face-act-despite-rising-threats-to-clinics/">House Judiciary Hearing Targets FACE Act Despite Rising Threats to Clinics</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none yarpp-template-list'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginians Vote Yes for Redistricting to Reshape House Control</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/virginians-vote-yes-in-special-election-on-redistricting/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piper Winton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ballot Measure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midterms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special election]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 21, Virginians voted yes on a ballot measure to allow the state to temporarily redraw congressional maps before the midterms. Virginia held a special election with only one question on the ballot: whether Virginia should be allowed to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections. The measure passed [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/virginians-vote-yes-in-special-election-on-redistricting/">Virginians Vote Yes for Redistricting to Reshape House Control</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none yarpp-template-list'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania Court Recognizes Reproductive Autonomy Under State Equal Rights Amendment</title>
		<link>https://feminist.org/news/pennsylvania-court-recognizes-reproductive-autonomy-under-state-equal-rights-amendment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giovanna DeStefanis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://feminist.org/?p=88565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 20, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued a landmark ruling for reproductive rights, striking down the state&#8217;s ban on Medicaid funding for abortion. The court held that the policy violates Pennsylvania Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) and the equal protection provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution.&#160; The Pennsylvania Equal Rights Amendment, added to the state constitution [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://feminist.org/news/pennsylvania-court-recognizes-reproductive-autonomy-under-state-equal-rights-amendment/">Pennsylvania Court Recognizes Reproductive Autonomy Under State Equal Rights Amendment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://feminist.org">Feminist Majority Foundation</a>.</p>
<div class='yarpp yarpp-related yarpp-related-rss yarpp-template-list'>
<!-- YARPP List -->
<h3>Related posts:</h3><ol>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/shield-laws-vs-vigilante-lawsuits-the-new-abortion-battleground/" rel="bookmark" title="Shield Laws vs. Vigilante Lawsuits: The New Abortion Battleground">Shield Laws vs. Vigilante Lawsuits: The New Abortion Battleground</a></li>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/urgent-care-clinic-in-michigan-fills-gaps-in-abortion-access/" rel="bookmark" title="Urgent Care Clinic in Michigan Fills Gaps in Abortion Access">Urgent Care Clinic in Michigan Fills Gaps in Abortion Access</a></li>
<li><a href="https://feminist.org/news/doj-targets-face-act-while-anti-abortion-violence-rises/" rel="bookmark" title="DOJ Targets FACE Act While Anti-Abortion Violence Rises">DOJ Targets FACE Act While Anti-Abortion Violence Rises</a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
