<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FilterJoe</title>
	
	<link>http://www.filterjoe.com</link>
	<description>Find what you need. Work without distraction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Filterjoecomments" /><feedburner:info uri="filterjoecomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Which Password Manager? by Thrawn</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/V2lVmJ7FbHU/</link>
		<dc:creator>Thrawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=912#comment-19597</guid>
		<description>Long random passwords are all very well, but passphrases may be just as good while being much easier to remember &amp; type. A string of random dictionary words has very high entropy (you can do the math), but can usually be remembered easily with a mnemonic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long random passwords are all very well, but passphrases may be just as good while being much easier to remember &amp; type. A string of random dictionary words has very high entropy (you can do the math), but can usually be remembered easily with a mnemonic.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/V2lVmJ7FbHU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/which-password-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-19597</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/hShFpx8B3oI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-18359</guid>
		<description>Mike - I haven't had a chance to test a Kobo (or a Sony either), so I couldn't write credibly about anything but the Nook or Kindle (and iPod touch). I have yet to encounter any non techie type person who uses Calibre - but perhaps that's just a coincidence. Kindle makes syncing so incredibly easy that anyone can use it.

That being said - I agree with you more than disagree. I have paid less than $5 total for digital books during my 3 years of using E-readers. I'm using my $79 Kindle 4 primarily for the simplicity of Instapaper to read articles, while I'm using the Nook to read free books.

Until I can be assured that my book purchases confer me the same rights I'd have with a physical book (that I will be able to keep it as long as I like, and lend it out to whoever I want for as long as I want), I can't see myself paying prices for e-books that are comparable to physical books. Perhaps a $1 or $2 for a book, but no way $9.99 for a book that I may or may not be able to read 10 years from now on the hardware/platform of that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; I haven&#8217;t had a chance to test a Kobo (or a Sony either), so I couldn&#8217;t write credibly about anything but the Nook or Kindle (and iPod touch). I have yet to encounter any non techie type person who uses Calibre &#8211; but perhaps that&#8217;s just a coincidence. Kindle makes syncing so incredibly easy that anyone can use it.</p>
<p>That being said &#8211; I agree with you more than disagree. I have paid less than $5 total for digital books during my 3 years of using E-readers. I&#8217;m using my $79 Kindle 4 primarily for the simplicity of Instapaper to read articles, while I&#8217;m using the Nook to read free books.</p>
<p>Until I can be assured that my book purchases confer me the same rights I&#8217;d have with a physical book (that I will be able to keep it as long as I like, and lend it out to whoever I want for as long as I want), I can&#8217;t see myself paying prices for e-books that are comparable to physical books. Perhaps a $1 or $2 for a book, but no way $9.99 for a book that I may or may not be able to read 10 years from now on the hardware/platform of that time.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/hShFpx8B3oI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-18359</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by Mike</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/ThefHGoFcRQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-18357</guid>
		<description>Interesting read, but I disagree with the hardware points being minor.  On principle, I flat out refuse to *purchase* any ebooks with DRM, period, so platform is more or less irrelevant to me.  Until the bookstores are willing to sell DRM-free files (as the music industry has finally figured out), I'll be sticking to free reading material I can find in public domain works and from library checkouts using OverDrive (yes, this uses DRM, but I'm not paying money to access these books).

That said, I'm surprised there is no mention of Kobo's line of e-readers.  Nobody beats the out-of-the-box file format support of Kobo's units, and from what I can tell, the Kobo Touch uses the same display as the Nook Simple Touch.

In the end, I still went with the Nook over the Kobo Touch solely due to the hardware page turn buttons, and then I just use Calibre to load up all my epub files.  

This article seems to imply that Calibre is a complicated piece of software just for converting ebook files, but nothing could be further from the truth.  It's a wonderful program for managing your ebook library (of non-DRMed files--which isn't a problem for me), and whenever your reader is connected to the computer, a single click will transfer the file over to your reader, which is ultimately even easier that copying the file over using Windows Explorer (or whatever file manager application you use depending on OS).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, but I disagree with the hardware points being minor.  On principle, I flat out refuse to *purchase* any ebooks with DRM, period, so platform is more or less irrelevant to me.  Until the bookstores are willing to sell DRM-free files (as the music industry has finally figured out), I&#8217;ll be sticking to free reading material I can find in public domain works and from library checkouts using OverDrive (yes, this uses DRM, but I&#8217;m not paying money to access these books).</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m surprised there is no mention of Kobo&#8217;s line of e-readers.  Nobody beats the out-of-the-box file format support of Kobo&#8217;s units, and from what I can tell, the Kobo Touch uses the same display as the Nook Simple Touch.</p>
<p>In the end, I still went with the Nook over the Kobo Touch solely due to the hardware page turn buttons, and then I just use Calibre to load up all my epub files.  </p>
<p>This article seems to imply that Calibre is a complicated piece of software just for converting ebook files, but nothing could be further from the truth.  It&#8217;s a wonderful program for managing your ebook library (of non-DRMed files&#8211;which isn&#8217;t a problem for me), and whenever your reader is connected to the computer, a single click will transfer the file over to your reader, which is ultimately even easier that copying the file over using Windows Explorer (or whatever file manager application you use depending on OS).</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/ThefHGoFcRQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-18357</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Password Manager? by Peter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/7ICQFEvq9EY/</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=912#comment-17868</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your review.
I've been using PassMaster on a WM6.5 smartphone and a Windows desktop version syncing b/n both using Active Sync.  This has worked really well for me but I'm about to get an android phone for work so wanting to migrate my data, approx 300 entries, over to something which runs on both android and windows PCs.  I don't like the idea of the 'cloud' to store my passwords.  Passmaster can output a csv file so hoping I can load it into an android application easily.  Passmaster also had a very simple folder structure with a good search if required.  Will keep reading these reviews before making a decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your review.<br />
I&#8217;ve been using PassMaster on a WM6.5 smartphone and a Windows desktop version syncing b/n both using Active Sync.  This has worked really well for me but I&#8217;m about to get an android phone for work so wanting to migrate my data, approx 300 entries, over to something which runs on both android and windows PCs.  I don&#8217;t like the idea of the &#8216;cloud&#8217; to store my passwords.  Passmaster can output a csv file so hoping I can load it into an android application easily.  Passmaster also had a very simple folder structure with a good search if required.  Will keep reading these reviews before making a decision.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/7ICQFEvq9EY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/which-password-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-17868</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/e6dYlN9HXcM/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-17781</guid>
		<description>Wasim - Blackberry certainly has better voice call features but the particular iPhone omission you mentioned is easy to get around: Google Voice. My main number is with Google Voice so all my calls are logged for as long as I want. And not just the time/date/number - I have the complete voice mail from incoming calls and Google's best attempt at transcribing to text. Using Google Voice also means that the call logs and texts are easy to organize and see by Gmail contact.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasim &#8211; Blackberry certainly has better voice call features but the particular iPhone omission you mentioned is easy to get around: Google Voice. My main number is with Google Voice so all my calls are logged for as long as I want. And not just the time/date/number &#8211; I have the complete voice mail from incoming calls and Google&#8217;s best attempt at transcribing to text. Using Google Voice also means that the call logs and texts are easy to organize and see by Gmail contact.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/e6dYlN9HXcM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-17781</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by wasim khan</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/SQgt1w_esng/</link>
		<dc:creator>wasim khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-17780</guid>
		<description>I'm not agreed with u because blackberry bold 9700 9780 9790 save all call logs data of last months and no limit of one month call logs data     but iPhone 4s save c only last two days call logs data. It's a very important diffrence between two devices  and another:  bb bold automatically made seprate sms{ text} folder for every contact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not agreed with u because blackberry bold 9700 9780 9790 save all call logs data of last months and no limit of one month call logs data     but iPhone 4s save c only last two days call logs data. It&#8217;s a very important diffrence between two devices  and another:  bb bold automatically made seprate sms{ text} folder for every contact.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/SQgt1w_esng" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-17780</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Monitor Setup to Reduce Eye Fatigue and Distraction by Tahsin</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/x3QD9tKHWK0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1896#comment-17561</guid>
		<description>THANKS SO MUCH for this article. Was considering upgrading from my 21.5" triple monitor setup to triple 23.6" monitors. Your info really helped me understand how this is a waste of money considering they won't be any further from my eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANKS SO MUCH for this article. Was considering upgrading from my 21.5&#8243; triple monitor setup to triple 23.6&#8243; monitors. Your info really helped me understand how this is a waste of money considering they won&#8217;t be any further from my eyes.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/x3QD9tKHWK0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/26/the-best-monitor-setup-to-reduce-eye-fatigue-and-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-17561</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/f4S2mvEUmIk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-17299</guid>
		<description>Craig - I too am frustrated by the poor voice quality of the iPhone 4s. Holding it up to my ear is okay but speaker phone is sub par and use with earbuds is not acceptable. So I've taken matters into my own hands - or I guess you could say Google's hands. My main phone number is a Google Voice number. At first I just had it always ring to my iPhone 4s.

But in the last month, I've been using my Blackberry for some of the Google Voice calls by using inexpensive prepaid options from T-mobile. Better yet - I just started using Google Voice through my Gmail/Chat window and it's far better quality than the iPhone 4s using a head set. The speakerphone quality isn't all that great just because of my mediocre laptop but if I wanted to upgrade that I easily could by hooking something up to my laptop.

Other than voice quality, I'm happy with the iPhone 4s so now I'm just supplementing it with Blackberry or Computer/Gmail/chat use for longer business calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig &#8211; I too am frustrated by the poor voice quality of the iPhone 4s. Holding it up to my ear is okay but speaker phone is sub par and use with earbuds is not acceptable. So I&#8217;ve taken matters into my own hands &#8211; or I guess you could say Google&#8217;s hands. My main phone number is a Google Voice number. At first I just had it always ring to my iPhone 4s.</p>
<p>But in the last month, I&#8217;ve been using my Blackberry for some of the Google Voice calls by using inexpensive prepaid options from T-mobile. Better yet &#8211; I just started using Google Voice through my Gmail/Chat window and it&#8217;s far better quality than the iPhone 4s using a head set. The speakerphone quality isn&#8217;t all that great just because of my mediocre laptop but if I wanted to upgrade that I easily could by hooking something up to my laptop.</p>
<p>Other than voice quality, I&#8217;m happy with the iPhone 4s so now I&#8217;m just supplementing it with Blackberry or Computer/Gmail/chat use for longer business calls.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/f4S2mvEUmIk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-17299</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Craig</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/MLbPa8C4P60/</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-17297</guid>
		<description>I have been a Blackberry user for several years and last fall upgraded to the Bold 9930.  I was outside the U.S. in November and had my phone totally fail while charging one night.  The phone wouldn't turn on the next morning and neither Verizon nor RIM could revive it.  So the phone had to be replaced -- not the easiest thing to do when you are out of the country.

So for my next international business trip I purchased and took with me an iPhone 4s-- because I was concerned that the Bold was not reliable.  On this next trip, earlier this year, my Blackberry kept losing the connection with the Blackberry e-mail serviice -- this occurred both when I was roaming on the cellular system and also when I was using Wi-Fi.  Neither Verizon nor RIM could figure out why this was happening.  My iPhone, however, had no problem sending and receiving e-mail either on the cell phone network or via Wi-Fi.  

When I returned to the U.S., I was initially convinced that I could stop using the Blackberry and use only the iPhone.  However, I used the iPhone speakerphone a couple times for business conference calls and everyone complained that my voice was unclear and that they had difficulty understanding me.  I then used my Blackberry speakerphone and folks couldn't even tell I was on my speakerphone.

So I am now in a situation where my Blackberry is not reliable when I am out of the U.S. -- but my iPhone is not acceptable as a voice communication device.  I can't be in a situation where I don't have reliable e-mail access wherever I am in the world -- and I also can't be in a sitution where I don't have a phone that let's me clearly communicate via a phone call.  So, I find that I am having to keep both phones.  It's pretty frustrating -- and a bit expensive -- to find that I don't one phone that can servce both as a reliable mobile e-mai device and a phone!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a Blackberry user for several years and last fall upgraded to the Bold 9930.  I was outside the U.S. in November and had my phone totally fail while charging one night.  The phone wouldn&#8217;t turn on the next morning and neither Verizon nor RIM could revive it.  So the phone had to be replaced &#8212; not the easiest thing to do when you are out of the country.</p>
<p>So for my next international business trip I purchased and took with me an iPhone 4s&#8211; because I was concerned that the Bold was not reliable.  On this next trip, earlier this year, my Blackberry kept losing the connection with the Blackberry e-mail serviice &#8212; this occurred both when I was roaming on the cellular system and also when I was using Wi-Fi.  Neither Verizon nor RIM could figure out why this was happening.  My iPhone, however, had no problem sending and receiving e-mail either on the cell phone network or via Wi-Fi.  </p>
<p>When I returned to the U.S., I was initially convinced that I could stop using the Blackberry and use only the iPhone.  However, I used the iPhone speakerphone a couple times for business conference calls and everyone complained that my voice was unclear and that they had difficulty understanding me.  I then used my Blackberry speakerphone and folks couldn&#8217;t even tell I was on my speakerphone.</p>
<p>So I am now in a situation where my Blackberry is not reliable when I am out of the U.S. &#8212; but my iPhone is not acceptable as a voice communication device.  I can&#8217;t be in a situation where I don&#8217;t have reliable e-mail access wherever I am in the world &#8212; and I also can&#8217;t be in a sitution where I don&#8217;t have a phone that let&#8217;s me clearly communicate via a phone call.  So, I find that I am having to keep both phones.  It&#8217;s pretty frustrating &#8212; and a bit expensive &#8212; to find that I don&#8217;t one phone that can servce both as a reliable mobile e-mai device and a phone!.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/MLbPa8C4P60" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-17297</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/cUfblpApv6A/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-16204</guid>
		<description>Andy - You should try Opera. For many years they have done a great job of supporting the widest variety of operating systems, including very old ones. The only thing not to like about Opera is that some major web properties are not carefully tested with Opera, so the result to end users is that some sites have minor odd behaviors.

On the other hand, 10.4.11 is old for a Mac. My guess is that you may be having other frustrations besides just Firefox. Apple and the Apple development community tend to abandon Apple systems that are older than about 4 years or so. Windows systems tend to have a longer life - I just a few days ago finally retired a Windows XP Dell I purchased in 2004. And my new Windows Professional 7 system has an XP mode, so I'm able to run a piece of software I purchased in 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; You should try Opera. For many years they have done a great job of supporting the widest variety of operating systems, including very old ones. The only thing not to like about Opera is that some major web properties are not carefully tested with Opera, so the result to end users is that some sites have minor odd behaviors.</p>
<p>On the other hand, 10.4.11 is old for a Mac. My guess is that you may be having other frustrations besides just Firefox. Apple and the Apple development community tend to abandon Apple systems that are older than about 4 years or so. Windows systems tend to have a longer life &#8211; I just a few days ago finally retired a Windows XP Dell I purchased in 2004. And my new Windows Professional 7 system has an XP mode, so I&#8217;m able to run a piece of software I purchased in 2000.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/cUfblpApv6A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-16204</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Andy Viner Seiler</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/_bCUkqhtMAc/</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Viner Seiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-16199</guid>
		<description>Joe, this is such a splendid article. However, I have a major issue not addressed here that many other Firefox users MUST also have. I adore Firefox. I love the add-ons, I love the design &amp; features -- it's the best! Problem is, I have a 10.4.11 Mac, which falls JUST below the requirements for the newest version of Firefox. (That doesn't stop Mozilla from constantly suggesting I update to the latest version.) As if on cue, Firefox has slowed WAY down for me, &amp; various features just aren't working for the first time. I cannot afford a new Mac. Is there ANY browser that doesn't treat a 2007 Mac like an antique but that is sophisticated enough to fine-tune (I can't abide Safari at all)? Or am I just doomed to ever-decomposing performance? ANDY VINER SEILER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, this is such a splendid article. However, I have a major issue not addressed here that many other Firefox users MUST also have. I adore Firefox. I love the add-ons, I love the design &amp; features &#8212; it&#8217;s the best! Problem is, I have a 10.4.11 Mac, which falls JUST below the requirements for the newest version of Firefox. (That doesn&#8217;t stop Mozilla from constantly suggesting I update to the latest version.) As if on cue, Firefox has slowed WAY down for me, &amp; various features just aren&#8217;t working for the first time. I cannot afford a new Mac. Is there ANY browser that doesn&#8217;t treat a 2007 Mac like an antique but that is sophisticated enough to fine-tune (I can&#8217;t abide Safari at all)? Or am I just doomed to ever-decomposing performance? ANDY VINER SEILER</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/_bCUkqhtMAc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-16199</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPod touch vs Kindle: Which is Best for Reading? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/1Lvz02gaMLI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1827#comment-16140</guid>
		<description>Ian - I haven't used either type of Mac but by all accounts the best consumer-priced display in existence is the new iPad which just came out a couple days ago. DPI is not quite as high as the Retina displays in the iPod touch and iPhone but it is a much bigger device so you'll hold it further away from your eyes. You can then pinch your fingers wider to make the fonts bigger whenever you need to.

If you haven't experimented with the latest E Ink Kindles or Nook Simple Touch, you should. Some people find these kind of displays much easier on their eyes than traditional LCDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian &#8211; I haven&#8217;t used either type of Mac but by all accounts the best consumer-priced display in existence is the new iPad which just came out a couple days ago. DPI is not quite as high as the Retina displays in the iPod touch and iPhone but it is a much bigger device so you&#8217;ll hold it further away from your eyes. You can then pinch your fingers wider to make the fonts bigger whenever you need to.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t experimented with the latest E Ink Kindles or Nook Simple Touch, you should. Some people find these kind of displays much easier on their eyes than traditional LCDs.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/1Lvz02gaMLI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/07/ipod-touch-vs-kindle-which-is-best-for-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-16140</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPod touch vs Kindle: Which is Best for Reading? by Ian Stuart</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/uqMSpQ1fKzk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1827#comment-16133</guid>
		<description>I have found my eyesight declining in the last few years. I have bought new computer glasses, but they are not as effective as I hoped. I was about to buy a MacBook Pro, but I now wonder if an iMac might be better from the vision point of view. Would it give greater clarity?

Many thanks for an interesting article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found my eyesight declining in the last few years. I have bought new computer glasses, but they are not as effective as I hoped. I was about to buy a MacBook Pro, but I now wonder if an iMac might be better from the vision point of view. Would it give greater clarity?</p>
<p>Many thanks for an interesting article</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/uqMSpQ1fKzk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/07/ipod-touch-vs-kindle-which-is-best-for-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-16133</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by Claudia</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/mVA7JF3fPWI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-14031</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this excellent writeup!  I'd been on the fence about whether to get the Nook Simple Touch or the Kindle, but your comprehensive analysis made me realize the main thing I want is an ereader that's very easy on the eyes, has terrific battery life and is lightweight.  

I think the NST will suit me much better than the Kindle, especially since rooting the NST is so simple that I'll easily be able to also install Kindle for Android.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this excellent writeup!  I&#8217;d been on the fence about whether to get the Nook Simple Touch or the Kindle, but your comprehensive analysis made me realize the main thing I want is an ereader that&#8217;s very easy on the eyes, has terrific battery life and is lightweight.  </p>
<p>I think the NST will suit me much better than the Kindle, especially since rooting the NST is so simple that I&#8217;ll easily be able to also install Kindle for Android.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/mVA7JF3fPWI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-14031</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/qy6jj0V-d94/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-13715</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your detailed, personal experiences, David. With regard to typing on glass, for whatever reason I'm able to do it at about the same speed as the BB 9700. I'm sure I'd be faster on the BB 9900 because it has a larger keyboard - I know that I took a hit when I went from the BB 8320 to the BB 9700 with its slightly smaller form factor. But my guess is the biggest difference is our usage. If it requires a long reply, I almost always wait until I'm by a computer, so I've never experienced the pain of typing out a message of more than about 300 characters or so.

For the usage scenario you outline, I would recommend the BB 9900 over the iPhone 4s. It is better at messaging in so many ways, and not just due to the keyboard for those who type longer messages. Personalized/customized notifications, keyboard shortcuts, profiles - all these things are great for the highly mobile professional who doesn't care all that much about the pocket computer functions and great camera. 

For the work that I do, particularly on this blog, the pocket computer functions and camera are very helpful so clearly my usage scenario is different from yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your detailed, personal experiences, David. With regard to typing on glass, for whatever reason I&#8217;m able to do it at about the same speed as the BB 9700. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;d be faster on the BB 9900 because it has a larger keyboard &#8211; I know that I took a hit when I went from the BB 8320 to the BB 9700 with its slightly smaller form factor. But my guess is the biggest difference is our usage. If it requires a long reply, I almost always wait until I&#8217;m by a computer, so I&#8217;ve never experienced the pain of typing out a message of more than about 300 characters or so.</p>
<p>For the usage scenario you outline, I would recommend the BB 9900 over the iPhone 4s. It is better at messaging in so many ways, and not just due to the keyboard for those who type longer messages. Personalized/customized notifications, keyboard shortcuts, profiles &#8211; all these things are great for the highly mobile professional who doesn&#8217;t care all that much about the pocket computer functions and great camera. </p>
<p>For the work that I do, particularly on this blog, the pocket computer functions and camera are very helpful so clearly my usage scenario is different from yours.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/qy6jj0V-d94" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-13715</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by David Scott</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/ESe0l4WDItU/</link>
		<dc:creator>David Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-13709</guid>
		<description>Joe - nice writeup.  I've been a Blackberry user since 2000, and like you, tried the iPhone out for an extended period of time (3 weeks).  Unlike you, I had the opposite conclusion - I went back to the Blackberry 9900 (you were comparing 4s with 9700).  

I was kind of surprised that your only real gripe with the iPhone was the voice/call quality.  Agree with you on this point, but seriously - you have NO problems with typing on glass?  I found the typing on the iPhone to be PAINFUL - especially when trying to send a professional/work email.  Yes, for texting or communicating with friends, typing "where r u" is fine, but no way can I do this for work.  Given the autocorrect and inherant lower typing accuracy rate on the iPhone, I'd find myself taking twice as long to write an email, then having to double check it multiple times to make sure autocorrect didn't gaf and make me say something obscene.

Another thing on the typing - there is a big difference between the iPhone and the Blackberry due to the physical keyboard.  I didn't realize this but given my familiarity with Blackberry, I can actually type on it without looking AT THE KEYBOARD because I can feel the keys, etc.  This allows me to compose highly accurate messages (email/text) very very quickly.  This is virtually impossible with the iPhone - you HAVE to look at the keyboard when typing.  This is a huge drop in efficiency for me.  

Agreed with you and everyone else - the iPhone is like a mini-computer in your pocket, and truly excels in the MEDIA space.  Yes, it has a better camera.  Yes, it has better apps.  Yes it allows you to stay updated with your friends.  And if you only need to consider communication, in any form (IE:  where r u), iPhone does great.  I think it's a great device for the social aspect of people's lives - taking pictures, keeping up with facebook, listening to music, browsing the web.  I can't imagine how great it is for people who work in the arts. 

But for professionals, who are on the go, and primarily use their phones to send accurate, quick, professional messages and don't use all the social capabilities (don't take pictures, browse the web, etc.) - I personally think the Blackberry 9900, which in my experience is the best Blackberry to date, is still far superior.  I fall into this category, which I quickly found out while trialing the iPhone.  I rarely used any of the apps, and found myself consistently frustrated with the time and focus needed to type messages.  I primarily text/email with my phone - that's what I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe &#8211; nice writeup.  I&#8217;ve been a Blackberry user since 2000, and like you, tried the iPhone out for an extended period of time (3 weeks).  Unlike you, I had the opposite conclusion &#8211; I went back to the Blackberry 9900 (you were comparing 4s with 9700).  </p>
<p>I was kind of surprised that your only real gripe with the iPhone was the voice/call quality.  Agree with you on this point, but seriously &#8211; you have NO problems with typing on glass?  I found the typing on the iPhone to be PAINFUL &#8211; especially when trying to send a professional/work email.  Yes, for texting or communicating with friends, typing &#8220;where r u&#8221; is fine, but no way can I do this for work.  Given the autocorrect and inherant lower typing accuracy rate on the iPhone, I&#8217;d find myself taking twice as long to write an email, then having to double check it multiple times to make sure autocorrect didn&#8217;t gaf and make me say something obscene.</p>
<p>Another thing on the typing &#8211; there is a big difference between the iPhone and the Blackberry due to the physical keyboard.  I didn&#8217;t realize this but given my familiarity with Blackberry, I can actually type on it without looking AT THE KEYBOARD because I can feel the keys, etc.  This allows me to compose highly accurate messages (email/text) very very quickly.  This is virtually impossible with the iPhone &#8211; you HAVE to look at the keyboard when typing.  This is a huge drop in efficiency for me.  </p>
<p>Agreed with you and everyone else &#8211; the iPhone is like a mini-computer in your pocket, and truly excels in the MEDIA space.  Yes, it has a better camera.  Yes, it has better apps.  Yes it allows you to stay updated with your friends.  And if you only need to consider communication, in any form (IE:  where r u), iPhone does great.  I think it&#8217;s a great device for the social aspect of people&#8217;s lives &#8211; taking pictures, keeping up with facebook, listening to music, browsing the web.  I can&#8217;t imagine how great it is for people who work in the arts. </p>
<p>But for professionals, who are on the go, and primarily use their phones to send accurate, quick, professional messages and don&#8217;t use all the social capabilities (don&#8217;t take pictures, browse the web, etc.) &#8211; I personally think the Blackberry 9900, which in my experience is the best Blackberry to date, is still far superior.  I fall into this category, which I quickly found out while trialing the iPhone.  I rarely used any of the apps, and found myself consistently frustrated with the time and focus needed to type messages.  I primarily text/email with my phone &#8211; that&#8217;s what I do.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/ESe0l4WDItU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-13709</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Per-Ola</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/9lyyh0im0h4/</link>
		<dc:creator>Per-Ola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-13556</guid>
		<description>Interesting reading. I used BBerries extensively 2004-2008, switched to iPhone 3GS in December of 2009 - while I truly was looking at the new BBerry Bold 9700. After a few days with the iPhone, I was so glad I did not pick up the Bold...

Then in spring of 2011, employer gave me a BBerry Torch - while I am still suing the iPhone (now a 4S) in parallel for private use.

The BBerry has a better radio, and amazing battery life!
BUT, that's where the advantages stop. EVERYTHING else works better on the iPhone. Not sure how many times I get hopelessly frustrated on the BBerry when the menus and functions change totally, depending if you have the "slider" open or not. The "trackpad" on the BBErry is AWFUL (the old trackball was actually much better) as it seems impossible to get the sensitivity correct (important when editing/change text or e-mails).

Also, I have no idea what the BBerry designers were thinking when they put the "lock" button on top of the phone. You drop it "upside down" in a pocket, phone will unlock itself. You drop it "right way up" and phone will unlock itself when you are pushing it down - and call someone or compase and e-mail in the process.

The Torch with the "slider" also gave up on what set the old BBErries apart: a great keyboard! On the Torch, in order to keep the thickness down, they developed a very "flat", or without structure, keyboard. I do not have fat fingers, but I will say that I type faster on the iPhone than on this BBerry. And, it did not use to be like that. BBerries WERE the best for composing mails.

I think RIM would do "OK" if they tried to stay with what they are (or were?) really good at, instead of trying to cram too much into a phone, and ending up being good at nothing.

As for the iPhone 4S, I'm still very happy. Have over the years nailed it down to a few very very useful apps, and weekly venture out to see what new (and free) to try out. Over the past 2+ years, I still have to "buy" an app. 
Also, I never thought I would entrust iTunes with my contacts, but I have to admit that I am impressed how iTunes integrates and creates the "funnel" for information between the phone and Outlook. In fact, it does that far better than the comparable syncing of Outlook and WinPhone7.
And yes, iTunes on Windows is a processor hog, but I only run it when I need to, so no real issues there.

Battery life on the iPhone 4S. Not bad at all. Charge nightly, and can do one full day with a fair amount of "data services". Wife's 4S that was picked up at the same time drained horribly. A couple of SW loads did not help it, so she eventually had hers replaced, only to drain again. Yet more SW patches, and her phone is as good as mine. But she was very frustrated - until it was all fixed (three trips to the Apple store).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting reading. I used BBerries extensively 2004-2008, switched to iPhone 3GS in December of 2009 &#8211; while I truly was looking at the new BBerry Bold 9700. After a few days with the iPhone, I was so glad I did not pick up the Bold&#8230;</p>
<p>Then in spring of 2011, employer gave me a BBerry Torch &#8211; while I am still suing the iPhone (now a 4S) in parallel for private use.</p>
<p>The BBerry has a better radio, and amazing battery life!<br />
BUT, that&#8217;s where the advantages stop. EVERYTHING else works better on the iPhone. Not sure how many times I get hopelessly frustrated on the BBerry when the menus and functions change totally, depending if you have the &#8220;slider&#8221; open or not. The &#8220;trackpad&#8221; on the BBErry is AWFUL (the old trackball was actually much better) as it seems impossible to get the sensitivity correct (important when editing/change text or e-mails).</p>
<p>Also, I have no idea what the BBerry designers were thinking when they put the &#8220;lock&#8221; button on top of the phone. You drop it &#8220;upside down&#8221; in a pocket, phone will unlock itself. You drop it &#8220;right way up&#8221; and phone will unlock itself when you are pushing it down &#8211; and call someone or compase and e-mail in the process.</p>
<p>The Torch with the &#8220;slider&#8221; also gave up on what set the old BBErries apart: a great keyboard! On the Torch, in order to keep the thickness down, they developed a very &#8220;flat&#8221;, or without structure, keyboard. I do not have fat fingers, but I will say that I type faster on the iPhone than on this BBerry. And, it did not use to be like that. BBerries WERE the best for composing mails.</p>
<p>I think RIM would do &#8220;OK&#8221; if they tried to stay with what they are (or were?) really good at, instead of trying to cram too much into a phone, and ending up being good at nothing.</p>
<p>As for the iPhone 4S, I&#8217;m still very happy. Have over the years nailed it down to a few very very useful apps, and weekly venture out to see what new (and free) to try out. Over the past 2+ years, I still have to &#8220;buy&#8221; an app.<br />
Also, I never thought I would entrust iTunes with my contacts, but I have to admit that I am impressed how iTunes integrates and creates the &#8220;funnel&#8221; for information between the phone and Outlook. In fact, it does that far better than the comparable syncing of Outlook and WinPhone7.<br />
And yes, iTunes on Windows is a processor hog, but I only run it when I need to, so no real issues there.</p>
<p>Battery life on the iPhone 4S. Not bad at all. Charge nightly, and can do one full day with a fair amount of &#8220;data services&#8221;. Wife&#8217;s 4S that was picked up at the same time drained horribly. A couple of SW loads did not help it, so she eventually had hers replaced, only to drain again. Yet more SW patches, and her phone is as good as mine. But she was very frustrated &#8211; until it was all fixed (three trips to the Apple store).</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/9lyyh0im0h4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-13556</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Subscribe to FilterJoe via Email, Twitter, or RSS by Jeff Wallace</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/AkkSAEtKrk0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2126#comment-13479</guid>
		<description>Love the spare, concise, comprehensive style and content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the spare, concise, comprehensive style and content.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/AkkSAEtKrk0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/04/25/subscribe-to-filterjoe-via-email-twitter-or-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-13479</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Monitor Setup to Reduce Eye Fatigue and Distraction by Avi</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/5KlTvPYYuIQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1896#comment-13440</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.

For reading a book on the computer (.e.g a PDF), I've found that two pages side-by-side view greatly enhances my reading experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.</p>
<p>For reading a book on the computer (.e.g a PDF), I&#8217;ve found that two pages side-by-side view greatly enhances my reading experience.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/5KlTvPYYuIQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/26/the-best-monitor-setup-to-reduce-eye-fatigue-and-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-13440</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Attackers Steal Passwords by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/7SYse8gqOa8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=921#comment-13406</guid>
		<description>Sandy - For Comcast specifically, I found the following thread on the subject of recovering email when your entire inbox has been deleted:

&lt;a href="http://forums.comcast.com/t5/E-Mail-and-Xfinity-Connect-Help/Recover-deleted-email-from-Inbox/td-p/811510" rel="nofollow"&gt;Recovering deleted email from Inbox&lt;/a&gt;

Comcast has been having a lot of problems in the past year with hackers breaking into customer email accounts but I suspect it has more to do with the Sony hack than Comcast. My guess is that many people were using the same password for both their Sony Playstation account and their Comcast account. The stolen Playstation passwords could therefore be used to get into peoples' Comcast accounts in cases where the 2 passwords were the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy &#8211; For Comcast specifically, I found the following thread on the subject of recovering email when your entire inbox has been deleted:</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.comcast.com/t5/E-Mail-and-Xfinity-Connect-Help/Recover-deleted-email-from-Inbox/td-p/811510" rel="nofollow">Recovering deleted email from Inbox</a></p>
<p>Comcast has been having a lot of problems in the past year with hackers breaking into customer email accounts but I suspect it has more to do with the Sony hack than Comcast. My guess is that many people were using the same password for both their Sony Playstation account and their Comcast account. The stolen Playstation passwords could therefore be used to get into peoples&#8217; Comcast accounts in cases where the 2 passwords were the same.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/7SYse8gqOa8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/how-attackers-steal-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-13406</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Attackers Steal Passwords by Sandy Brown</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/LBezzM4_3KE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=921#comment-13378</guid>
		<description>My inbox has been deleted and I need to know where the emails are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My inbox has been deleted and I need to know where the emails are!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/LBezzM4_3KE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/how-attackers-steal-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-13378</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Mark</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/PIpqKo9FLDo/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-13290</guid>
		<description>I use blackberry now and frequently use my wife's iPhone 4. It's a joy to use iphone for browsing, playing games, and yes, it's quick camera.

One thing you might have considered though is locating them. In blackberry, you go to the website, log in and then locate your phone. No need for another blackberry device. You can use any computer+internet. There is also no way for anyone who may be carrying the phone to disable being located (unless they switch off of course). 

For iPhone, the missing device should have "Find iPhone" configured in iCloud, then find another device (iPhone or iPad), then install "Find iPhone", then launch and login. But then, the person who may be holding the missing iPhone can easily just disable being tracked. 

But then this BB advantage may not matter to you, just like multitasking wasn't also considered in your comparison. 

I like both... I wish I could afford them. At the moment, I love my BB but will need iPhone for what BB lacks like hotspot, autofocus camera, map (yeah iPhone beats BB on this), multiple alarms, apps, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use blackberry now and frequently use my wife&#8217;s iPhone 4. It&#8217;s a joy to use iphone for browsing, playing games, and yes, it&#8217;s quick camera.</p>
<p>One thing you might have considered though is locating them. In blackberry, you go to the website, log in and then locate your phone. No need for another blackberry device. You can use any computer+internet. There is also no way for anyone who may be carrying the phone to disable being located (unless they switch off of course). </p>
<p>For iPhone, the missing device should have &#8220;Find iPhone&#8221; configured in iCloud, then find another device (iPhone or iPad), then install &#8220;Find iPhone&#8221;, then launch and login. But then, the person who may be holding the missing iPhone can easily just disable being tracked. </p>
<p>But then this BB advantage may not matter to you, just like multitasking wasn&#8217;t also considered in your comparison. </p>
<p>I like both&#8230; I wish I could afford them. At the moment, I love my BB but will need iPhone for what BB lacks like hotspot, autofocus camera, map (yeah iPhone beats BB on this), multiple alarms, apps, etc.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/PIpqKo9FLDo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-13290</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/eRMGBpTwIt0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-13120</guid>
		<description>Caleb - You're right - a comparison with the Bold 9900 would be best. I'd love to use a Blackberry 9900 to use for a couple months to see how it compares, but it's too expensive for me to conduct this experiment. So I had to make do with what I have, which is nearly 2 years of using a Bold 9700.

That being said, the Bold 9900 is not lightyears ahead of the 9700. It literally has a worse camera (no autofocus) and for the first few months of release had no UMA, which was a critical feature for me that helped make the 9700 the best phone choice for me 2 years ago. Obviously it's much faster, has more memory, has a bigger screen with more pixels and a bigger/better keyboard. But it didn't fundamentally change the fact that Blackberries are lousy pocket computers - the O/S is just a minor skin surface update from everything I read. Maybe QNX will change all that but it's not a current choice.

So in my particular case, the Blackberry 9700 was a reasonable proxy for the BB 9900 in terms of the things I really cared about. As I said in the post, I'm preferring the iPhone 4s over the 9700, even though the use of the 4s for voice phone calls leaves much to be desired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caleb &#8211; You&#8217;re right &#8211; a comparison with the Bold 9900 would be best. I&#8217;d love to use a Blackberry 9900 to use for a couple months to see how it compares, but it&#8217;s too expensive for me to conduct this experiment. So I had to make do with what I have, which is nearly 2 years of using a Bold 9700.</p>
<p>That being said, the Bold 9900 is not lightyears ahead of the 9700. It literally has a worse camera (no autofocus) and for the first few months of release had no UMA, which was a critical feature for me that helped make the 9700 the best phone choice for me 2 years ago. Obviously it&#8217;s much faster, has more memory, has a bigger screen with more pixels and a bigger/better keyboard. But it didn&#8217;t fundamentally change the fact that Blackberries are lousy pocket computers &#8211; the O/S is just a minor skin surface update from everything I read. Maybe QNX will change all that but it&#8217;s not a current choice.</p>
<p>So in my particular case, the Blackberry 9700 was a reasonable proxy for the BB 9900 in terms of the things I really cared about. As I said in the post, I&#8217;m preferring the iPhone 4s over the 9700, even though the use of the 4s for voice phone calls leaves much to be desired.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/eRMGBpTwIt0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-13120</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Caleb Dusdal</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/0laMa3AiV50/</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb Dusdal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-13090</guid>
		<description>Did you just compare the performance of a blackberry released in December 2009 with an iphone released in late 2011?

Perhaps a comparison with a bold 9900 would be more relevant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you just compare the performance of a blackberry released in December 2009 with an iphone released in late 2011?</p>
<p>Perhaps a comparison with a bold 9900 would be more relevant?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/0laMa3AiV50" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-13090</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs. iPhone: No Longer a Contest by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/iwHnb59Z6g0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2374#comment-13067</guid>
		<description>Rob - I suggest you read my followup post:

&lt;a href="http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Blackberry vs. iPhone 4s After 2 Months of Use&lt;/a&gt;

The iPhone 4s has inferior voice call quality and is less customizeable around notifications. So if you're in a call intensive profession you'll be better off with Blackberry. If not, you'll likely prefer the 4s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; I suggest you read my followup post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/" rel="nofollow">Blackberry vs. iPhone 4s After 2 Months of Use</a></p>
<p>The iPhone 4s has inferior voice call quality and is less customizeable around notifications. So if you&#8217;re in a call intensive profession you&#8217;ll be better off with Blackberry. If not, you&#8217;ll likely prefer the 4s.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/iwHnb59Z6g0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/10/19/blackberry-vs-iphone-no-longer-a-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-13067</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs. iPhone: No Longer a Contest by rob newton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/hc_gUD6RUrE/</link>
		<dc:creator>rob newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2374#comment-13060</guid>
		<description>hi - i've read your comments, i'm in the uk so price doesnt matter. i love my bb 9700 but need to upgrade, everyone's got the iphone, not sure i like it. shall i go for the 9900 or iphone 4s now that you've had more time to think about it...
rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi &#8211; i&#8217;ve read your comments, i&#8217;m in the uk so price doesnt matter. i love my bb 9700 but need to upgrade, everyone&#8217;s got the iphone, not sure i like it. shall i go for the 9900 or iphone 4s now that you&#8217;ve had more time to think about it&#8230;<br />
rob</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/hc_gUD6RUrE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/10/19/blackberry-vs-iphone-no-longer-a-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-13060</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by alice</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/Y2rr60lyvmY/</link>
		<dc:creator>alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12890</guid>
		<description>Avant browser, firefox and ie 9 have improved in 2011. Avant browser adds more useful features and merged gecko core in avant 2012. Firefox resolved memory leaks in firefox 10. IE9 has own HTML 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avant browser, firefox and ie 9 have improved in 2011. Avant browser adds more useful features and merged gecko core in avant 2012. Firefox resolved memory leaks in firefox 10. IE9 has own HTML 5.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/Y2rr60lyvmY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12890</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by @aldrichdee</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/2u0BO6b8VB8/</link>
		<dc:creator>@aldrichdee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12820</guid>
		<description>On monday, February 6. I am switching to iPhone4S from BlackBerry Torch 9800. I had mine reserved from Globe Tel. Philippines and it will be ready for pick-up this monday. I have no doubt in switching 'cause I am fed up with my current device. Long reboot process, slow app opening, closing and switching, irritating blinking LED, trackpad that often gets stuck, slow web browsing and really slow camera. I can't wait to get my iPhone4S on monday!

And, about the iPhone4S battery issues, you may want to google that 'cause there are plenty of fixes that actually works. Please keep in touch and help me survive the coming days while waiting for my iPhone! Hahaha. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On monday, February 6. I am switching to iPhone4S from BlackBerry Torch 9800. I had mine reserved from Globe Tel. Philippines and it will be ready for pick-up this monday. I have no doubt in switching &#8217;cause I am fed up with my current device. Long reboot process, slow app opening, closing and switching, irritating blinking LED, trackpad that often gets stuck, slow web browsing and really slow camera. I can&#8217;t wait to get my iPhone4S on monday!</p>
<p>And, about the iPhone4S battery issues, you may want to google that &#8217;cause there are plenty of fixes that actually works. Please keep in touch and help me survive the coming days while waiting for my iPhone! Hahaha. </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/2u0BO6b8VB8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12820</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Steve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/T0xwhZ_3MmE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12801</guid>
		<description>Yes pretty much agree of how web/browser development should not be going on ! Few years ago with Opera browser with some hard tweaked 56k analog dialup internet acces with speed arround to 256k (many of you wont belive it - hardware/soft/os/tcpip optimization max possible - until home telephone company has installed some CPM's on physical line/wire - juish tech to slow user down and then wanted to sell me some complette ISDN internet access with exact 2x128 kb speed and some hardware to at unbelivable high price (today this will be around 1000 euro) - 2 month salary and ) i have manage to have many web pages opened and still opening new web page on klick of a mouse ! Today i have cable broadband 6mb+ and browsing internet is horrible terrible experience ! Web browsing is consuming more resources as some heavy game written for the same hardware ! Personaly i use Opera browser as is fastest but without java script enabled ! Pages that wont open due java script i simply ignore ! What i miss today in browsers is inteligent page handling for more opened tabs ! Pretty soon we will be advise in computer shop's that for internet browsing 4 GB ram is minimum ! Smells like home supercomputer for just to do what - internet browsing ??? Someone has lost his mind or more of them !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes pretty much agree of how web/browser development should not be going on ! Few years ago with Opera browser with some hard tweaked 56k analog dialup internet acces with speed arround to 256k (many of you wont belive it &#8211; hardware/soft/os/tcpip optimization max possible &#8211; until home telephone company has installed some CPM&#8217;s on physical line/wire &#8211; juish tech to slow user down and then wanted to sell me some complette ISDN internet access with exact 2&#215;128 kb speed and some hardware to at unbelivable high price (today this will be around 1000 euro) &#8211; 2 month salary and ) i have manage to have many web pages opened and still opening new web page on klick of a mouse ! Today i have cable broadband 6mb+ and browsing internet is horrible terrible experience ! Web browsing is consuming more resources as some heavy game written for the same hardware ! Personaly i use Opera browser as is fastest but without java script enabled ! Pages that wont open due java script i simply ignore ! What i miss today in browsers is inteligent page handling for more opened tabs ! Pretty soon we will be advise in computer shop&#8217;s that for internet browsing 4 GB ram is minimum ! Smells like home supercomputer for just to do what &#8211; internet browsing ??? Someone has lost his mind or more of them !!!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/T0xwhZ_3MmE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12801</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Chris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/4Fzb7OfJx5E/</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12791</guid>
		<description>My main issue is battery life... Firefox on my Macbook Pro seems to use more memory and increases heat and fan speed, running on average 10 degrees hotter... hence using more battery power than Safari or Chrome. I'm sure though over the years Firefox will improve. I think for Windows Chrome is the best &amp; on Mac Safari is the best. While Firefox is ok on both, people who support open source will obviously use Firefox out of principal alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main issue is battery life&#8230; Firefox on my Macbook Pro seems to use more memory and increases heat and fan speed, running on average 10 degrees hotter&#8230; hence using more battery power than Safari or Chrome. I&#8217;m sure though over the years Firefox will improve. I think for Windows Chrome is the best &amp; on Mac Safari is the best. While Firefox is ok on both, people who support open source will obviously use Firefox out of principal alone.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/4Fzb7OfJx5E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12791</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Noah Tepperman</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/BKwSwoKuo40/</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Tepperman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12743</guid>
		<description>I made the switch from a Bold 9700 to iPhone 4S in Nov. 2011.
Overall, I'm happy that I made the switch, but there is one major exception in the area of calendars &amp; reminder/alert/ notification/ etc.

On my BB, I used my Calendar as a combination of a calendar and a to-do list. I had a standard 15-minute-before reminder set up, and that reminder would ring (Normal profile) or vibrate (Silent profile). I could clear or snooze any reminder.

On my iPhone, I don't find it nearly as friendly. I can't snooze ANY notification/ reminder/ alert for anything from my calendar, and if I don't happen to catch a reminder when it pops up, I often miss it altogether.

I've been trying to figure out a better way to set things up, but so far I'm not having any luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made the switch from a Bold 9700 to iPhone 4S in Nov. 2011.<br />
Overall, I&#8217;m happy that I made the switch, but there is one major exception in the area of calendars &amp; reminder/alert/ notification/ etc.</p>
<p>On my BB, I used my Calendar as a combination of a calendar and a to-do list. I had a standard 15-minute-before reminder set up, and that reminder would ring (Normal profile) or vibrate (Silent profile). I could clear or snooze any reminder.</p>
<p>On my iPhone, I don&#8217;t find it nearly as friendly. I can&#8217;t snooze ANY notification/ reminder/ alert for anything from my calendar, and if I don&#8217;t happen to catch a reminder when it pops up, I often miss it altogether.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out a better way to set things up, but so far I&#8217;m not having any luck.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/BKwSwoKuo40" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12743</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Monitor Setup to Reduce Eye Fatigue and Distraction by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/U5jKx8Jtf7I/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1896#comment-12574</guid>
		<description>Martin- The anti glare coating is my least favorite aspect of my Dell monitor. I did get used to it after a few weeks. I needed to turn up the brightness much higher than I do with other monitors and that took care of it for me. I do have a window in my office and the anti-glare coating is effective when the sun shines bright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin- The anti glare coating is my least favorite aspect of my Dell monitor. I did get used to it after a few weeks. I needed to turn up the brightness much higher than I do with other monitors and that took care of it for me. I do have a window in my office and the anti-glare coating is effective when the sun shines bright.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/U5jKx8Jtf7I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/26/the-best-monitor-setup-to-reduce-eye-fatigue-and-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-12574</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Monitor Setup to Reduce Eye Fatigue and Distraction by Martin</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/E-Kftww-9ow/</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1896#comment-12572</guid>
		<description>Dear Joe

I was wondering regarding your monitor of choice, have you not been disturbed by the heavy anti glare coating of the Dell monitor? I have just purchased Dell U2212HM yesterday and I feel a little uneasy as to wether or not I can get used to the anti glare coating that brings this graininess/sparkling effect especially on white backgrounds. Like you, I also will be using the monitor for reading, thus spending most time reading pdf's or word documents with black text on white background. 

Have you overcome the anti glare coating? :-)

Cheers
Martin, Denmark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Joe</p>
<p>I was wondering regarding your monitor of choice, have you not been disturbed by the heavy anti glare coating of the Dell monitor? I have just purchased Dell U2212HM yesterday and I feel a little uneasy as to wether or not I can get used to the anti glare coating that brings this graininess/sparkling effect especially on white backgrounds. Like you, I also will be using the monitor for reading, thus spending most time reading pdf&#8217;s or word documents with black text on white background. </p>
<p>Have you overcome the anti glare coating? <img src='http://www.filterjoe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Martin, Denmark</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/E-Kftww-9ow" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/26/the-best-monitor-setup-to-reduce-eye-fatigue-and-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-12572</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/2j5_KZBs75Y/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12516</guid>
		<description>Brian - I can totally understand your point of view - a view which I shared for the last few years as I shook my head in disbelief that people were willing to live with such horrible voice quality on their phone, not to mention poor battery life and data usage. But, as I mentioned in detail in my post, the iPhone 4s has reached adequate in these areas (except for voice quality with earbuds) and of course it's a great pocket computer and camera. It also turned out to be considerably less expensive for me.

But a broader point with cell phones in general is that what works for one person won't work for another. I tried hard to lay out what worked and what didn't on the iPhone in the areas where Blackberry is traditionally strong - and continues to be strong. Armed with that information, some considering the 9900 vs. the 4s will choose one model, some the other. As I mentioned in my conclusion, I would have gone with the 9900 if I were in a profession that required frequent voice calls and messaging throughout the day, such as a real estate agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; I can totally understand your point of view &#8211; a view which I shared for the last few years as I shook my head in disbelief that people were willing to live with such horrible voice quality on their phone, not to mention poor battery life and data usage. But, as I mentioned in detail in my post, the iPhone 4s has reached adequate in these areas (except for voice quality with earbuds) and of course it&#8217;s a great pocket computer and camera. It also turned out to be considerably less expensive for me.</p>
<p>But a broader point with cell phones in general is that what works for one person won&#8217;t work for another. I tried hard to lay out what worked and what didn&#8217;t on the iPhone in the areas where Blackberry is traditionally strong &#8211; and continues to be strong. Armed with that information, some considering the 9900 vs. the 4s will choose one model, some the other. As I mentioned in my conclusion, I would have gone with the 9900 if I were in a profession that required frequent voice calls and messaging throughout the day, such as a real estate agent.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/2j5_KZBs75Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12516</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Brian</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/Q29vij_eHb4/</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12512</guid>
		<description>So you replaced a phone that was released in fall 2009 with a 2 year newer device, gave up the freedom of actually having a mobile device that can make it through the day without an extra charging, good audio quality, notifications, profiles, superior data usage, UMA, for a pocket computer that is a mediocre phone and are happy about it?  I just don't understand i guess.
The 9900 would have given you the speed and browser you like, with every other benefit of having a berry.  It has UMA now also..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you replaced a phone that was released in fall 2009 with a 2 year newer device, gave up the freedom of actually having a mobile device that can make it through the day without an extra charging, good audio quality, notifications, profiles, superior data usage, UMA, for a pocket computer that is a mediocre phone and are happy about it?  I just don&#8217;t understand i guess.<br />
The 9900 would have given you the speed and browser you like, with every other benefit of having a berry.  It has UMA now also..</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/Q29vij_eHb4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12512</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/meBvA1Lg9Jk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-12380</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your comments, David. I had the Kindle Touch for a month and found it so difficult to use that I returned it - and I am not alone as I see that reviews for the Kindle Touch are quite mixed. So now I too have the inexpensive ($79) Kindle 4. I agree with your comments. My biggest frustration with the Nook is that I can only easily use it to read books. I use Instapaper a bit and that means I use my Kindle for all the non-book reading. But I still much prefer the form factor and use of use of the Nook Simple Touch for simply reading a book. They did a good job of figuring out how to combine touch with an E-reader, unlike Amazon with its Kindle Touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your comments, David. I had the Kindle Touch for a month and found it so difficult to use that I returned it &#8211; and I am not alone as I see that reviews for the Kindle Touch are quite mixed. So now I too have the inexpensive ($79) Kindle 4. I agree with your comments. My biggest frustration with the Nook is that I can only easily use it to read books. I use Instapaper a bit and that means I use my Kindle for all the non-book reading. But I still much prefer the form factor and use of use of the Nook Simple Touch for simply reading a book. They did a good job of figuring out how to combine touch with an E-reader, unlike Amazon with its Kindle Touch.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/meBvA1Lg9Jk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-12380</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by David Crane</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/HDoWCIEwUlU/</link>
		<dc:creator>David Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-12378</guid>
		<description>I own the Nook Simple Touch and the lowest end new Kindle, sponsored and not with touch screen.  Ergonomically, the Nook wins hands down for me.  It feels best in my hand, and feels much more solid than the Kindle.  The only downside, physically, is that its slightly wider body makes it larger than my jacket pocket, while the kindle fits there nicely. That gives the Kindle an advantage when I am going out, and taking my ereader in case I have a reading opportunity.

There are, from my perspective, three important downsides for the nook.  First, arranging books into shelves, or collections in Kindle's parlance, is much more painful than on a Kindle.  When I create a shelf, I load book on it by entering an edit mode, then scrolling through all of my books until I find one(s) I want to add to the shelf.  That's OK until I have 35 pages of books to scroll through, and want one that starts with a letter that is later in the alphabet.  

Second, Nook does not offer a way to get samples and side-loaded books off the Kindle without connecting to my PC.  

Finally, B&amp;N's bookstore occasionally does some weird things on pricing.  Normally, I can count on B&amp;N books being a bit more expensive than on Amazon, and about the same as from the Sony and Google bookstores.  Every once in awhile their pricing is way out of line.  One book I wanted to buy was priced at $7.99 on Amazon, $8.99 on Sony and Google, and $16.08 on B&amp;N.  I am willing to pay a modest premium to get a book on my Nook, but not $7 - $8 relative to non-Amazon vendors.  So with that case, B&amp;N made me a price shopper, especially after their support told me that B&amp;N has no control over pricing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own the Nook Simple Touch and the lowest end new Kindle, sponsored and not with touch screen.  Ergonomically, the Nook wins hands down for me.  It feels best in my hand, and feels much more solid than the Kindle.  The only downside, physically, is that its slightly wider body makes it larger than my jacket pocket, while the kindle fits there nicely. That gives the Kindle an advantage when I am going out, and taking my ereader in case I have a reading opportunity.</p>
<p>There are, from my perspective, three important downsides for the nook.  First, arranging books into shelves, or collections in Kindle&#8217;s parlance, is much more painful than on a Kindle.  When I create a shelf, I load book on it by entering an edit mode, then scrolling through all of my books until I find one(s) I want to add to the shelf.  That&#8217;s OK until I have 35 pages of books to scroll through, and want one that starts with a letter that is later in the alphabet.  </p>
<p>Second, Nook does not offer a way to get samples and side-loaded books off the Kindle without connecting to my PC.  </p>
<p>Finally, B&amp;N&#8217;s bookstore occasionally does some weird things on pricing.  Normally, I can count on B&amp;N books being a bit more expensive than on Amazon, and about the same as from the Sony and Google bookstores.  Every once in awhile their pricing is way out of line.  One book I wanted to buy was priced at $7.99 on Amazon, $8.99 on Sony and Google, and $16.08 on B&amp;N.  I am willing to pay a modest premium to get a book on my Nook, but not $7 &#8211; $8 relative to non-Amazon vendors.  So with that case, B&amp;N made me a price shopper, especially after their support told me that B&amp;N has no control over pricing.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/HDoWCIEwUlU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-12378</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by JP</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/eeZCd8o6BLk/</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12314</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your in-depth review.  But are you sure you want to call Firefox "memory-efficient"?  I don't think even the folks at Firefox believe that! (LOL). A freshly launched Firefox hogs more than 3 times as much memory as Opera or Chrome on my system. After some surfing, this number climbs....

In any case, the only browser that no longer annoys me is Opera.  Everything else seems to either be unstable, bloated, lacking in user control, or just plain gimmicky. (Sadly, these are not mutually exclusive categories.)  I really do hope the people at Mozilla can get their house in order again, because Firefox was my favourite for years. In my opinion they destroyed it with this new rapid development cycle that makes browser updates outpace addon updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your in-depth review.  But are you sure you want to call Firefox &#8220;memory-efficient&#8221;?  I don&#8217;t think even the folks at Firefox believe that! (LOL). A freshly launched Firefox hogs more than 3 times as much memory as Opera or Chrome on my system. After some surfing, this number climbs&#8230;.</p>
<p>In any case, the only browser that no longer annoys me is Opera.  Everything else seems to either be unstable, bloated, lacking in user control, or just plain gimmicky. (Sadly, these are not mutually exclusive categories.)  I really do hope the people at Mozilla can get their house in order again, because Firefox was my favourite for years. In my opinion they destroyed it with this new rapid development cycle that makes browser updates outpace addon updates.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/eeZCd8o6BLk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12314</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by sourabh</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/jtmrU-pwNGI/</link>
		<dc:creator>sourabh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12230</guid>
		<description>You might want to check out Safari 5 on a Mac that has OS 10.5 or greater. Apple just updated it to fix some bugs and security issues. We have two Macs. My 7-year old G4 laptop with OS 10.4 (Tiger) doesn’t support Safari 5, but Safari 4 is faster than the latest version of Firefox, and meets all my needs. As of yesterday we have the latest version of Safari 5 on our iMac, OS 10.5, but I haven’t had a chance to try it out yet.

The problem is, as you pointed out, the browsers change so frequently that any comparison is likely to be out of date before you can publish it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to check out Safari 5 on a Mac that has OS 10.5 or greater. Apple just updated it to fix some bugs and security issues. We have two Macs. My 7-year old G4 laptop with OS 10.4 (Tiger) doesn’t support Safari 5, but Safari 4 is faster than the latest version of Firefox, and meets all my needs. As of yesterday we have the latest version of Safari 5 on our iMac, OS 10.5, but I haven’t had a chance to try it out yet.</p>
<p>The problem is, as you pointed out, the browsers change so frequently that any comparison is likely to be out of date before you can publish it.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/jtmrU-pwNGI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12230</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Password Manager? by Alex</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/s4eKtPUHHuQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=912#comment-12212</guid>
		<description>I’d add netwrix password manager  (www.netwrix.com) to this list as well. It‘s really easy for users to set up, and allows my end users to reset forgotten passwords without calling the helpdesk. I know the tool is also available in a freeware version for up to 40 or 50 end users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d add netwrix password manager  (www.netwrix.com) to this list as well. It‘s really easy for users to set up, and allows my end users to reset forgotten passwords without calling the helpdesk. I know the tool is also available in a freeware version for up to 40 or 50 end users.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/s4eKtPUHHuQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/which-password-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-12212</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/alnT41dh3rk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12198</guid>
		<description>I love Firefox, but version 9 is quite a bit annoying.  You might tell me that I installed this version within the 2 months you recommend to wait instead of after them, but I was upgrading from a much older version.  Now, when I go to a theme site, it will download a theme, but then give me an error when trying to install it, saying that it "could not be installed because Firefox cannot modify the needed file".  What does that mean, and what can I do to install a theme?  Dragging the downloaded theme from my Desktop into the Extensions tab as one site suggested also gave me an error message that it couldn't be installed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Firefox, but version 9 is quite a bit annoying.  You might tell me that I installed this version within the 2 months you recommend to wait instead of after them, but I was upgrading from a much older version.  Now, when I go to a theme site, it will download a theme, but then give me an error when trying to install it, saying that it &#8220;could not be installed because Firefox cannot modify the needed file&#8221;.  What does that mean, and what can I do to install a theme?  Dragging the downloaded theme from my Desktop into the Extensions tab as one site suggested also gave me an error message that it couldn&#8217;t be installed.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/alnT41dh3rk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12198</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Sugel</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/a7ITtcfaH3E/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 06:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12177</guid>
		<description>Summary: When I replaced my phone the second time with Apple it was still producing static and a ringing sound in the car. The guy I talked to at Car Toys said this was a major flaw with only the iPhone 4s (not iPhone 4, iPhone 3gs etc.) and that they are getting in around a person a day complaining about this problem. They confirmed that it was NOT a speaker, cable or stereo problem that the Genius Bar guy thought it would be. This issue only occurs in cars and potentially portable speakers since this is a grounding issue (home speakers will be fine). I am an Apple Fanboy and am not trying to hate on their quality products, but this was a pretty big deal to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summary: When I replaced my phone the second time with Apple it was still producing static and a ringing sound in the car. The guy I talked to at Car Toys said this was a major flaw with only the iPhone 4s (not iPhone 4, iPhone 3gs etc.) and that they are getting in around a person a day complaining about this problem. They confirmed that it was NOT a speaker, cable or stereo problem that the Genius Bar guy thought it would be. This issue only occurs in cars and potentially portable speakers since this is a grounding issue (home speakers will be fine). I am an Apple Fanboy and am not trying to hate on their quality products, but this was a pretty big deal to me.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/a7ITtcfaH3E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12177</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by JimmyH</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/d2zK1ba9-sM/</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-12144</guid>
		<description>I received my Simple Touch for Christmas and loved it. Then it autmatically downloaded the 1.1.0 update and now I cannot connect to my home wifi. B&amp;N told me I need to update my router settings. I do not want to do this for fear of causing problems with my other devices (laptop, iPhone, etc.). It was working fine before the update. B&amp;N really needs to address this problem soon. In the meantime, I'll connect through hotspots as needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received my Simple Touch for Christmas and loved it. Then it autmatically downloaded the 1.1.0 update and now I cannot connect to my home wifi. B&amp;N told me I need to update my router settings. I do not want to do this for fear of causing problems with my other devices (laptop, iPhone, etc.). It was working fine before the update. B&amp;N really needs to address this problem soon. In the meantime, I&#8217;ll connect through hotspots as needed.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/d2zK1ba9-sM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-12144</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/cWQvCWL6K6s/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 19:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-12067</guid>
		<description>Yan - The Kindle Fire is a color tablet while the Nook Simple Touch is a Black and White E Ink e-reader, so I'm not getting what you're after with your comment. A fair comparison is the Nook Simple Touch vs. the various Kindle E Ink devices such as the Kindle Keyboard, Kindle Touch, or the $79 Kindle. If you read through my post carefully, you'll see that my comments and conclusion are mixed. I prefer the hardware design and user interface of the Nook Simple Touch, but I much prefer the Kindle platform thanks to superior sync and ease of getting content onto the devices.

I have tried altogether 6 different reading devices and 4 of them are Kindles. Of all the Kindles, my favorite is the least expensive one without touch or keyboard. I found the Kindle Touch so difficult to use that I returned it.

I haven't tried any of the color readers from Amazon or Barnes and Noble.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yan &#8211; The Kindle Fire is a color tablet while the Nook Simple Touch is a Black and White E Ink e-reader, so I&#8217;m not getting what you&#8217;re after with your comment. A fair comparison is the Nook Simple Touch vs. the various Kindle E Ink devices such as the Kindle Keyboard, Kindle Touch, or the $79 Kindle. If you read through my post carefully, you&#8217;ll see that my comments and conclusion are mixed. I prefer the hardware design and user interface of the Nook Simple Touch, but I much prefer the Kindle platform thanks to superior sync and ease of getting content onto the devices.</p>
<p>I have tried altogether 6 different reading devices and 4 of them are Kindles. Of all the Kindles, my favorite is the least expensive one without touch or keyboard. I found the Kindle Touch so difficult to use that I returned it.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tried any of the color readers from Amazon or Barnes and Noble.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/cWQvCWL6K6s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-12067</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by Yan Kwok</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/nSy4qfkONlg/</link>
		<dc:creator>Yan Kwok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 06:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-12050</guid>
		<description>I find this article kind-of biased, the writer even says that he owns a Nook. With the new Kindle Fire out, I find that the Kindle is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this article kind-of biased, the writer even says that he owns a Nook. With the new Kindle Fire out, I find that the Kindle is better.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/nSy4qfkONlg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-12050</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Chrome be the Best Browser in 2011? Probably Not . . . by grace</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/n4v7RHMgneE/</link>
		<dc:creator>grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1762#comment-11989</guid>
		<description>i just switched from chrome to avant browser. So far so good. Avant is more stable but chrome is faster. I use a browser over 6 hours everyday. I choose avant browser, not chrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just switched from chrome to avant browser. So far so good. Avant is more stable but chrome is faster. I use a browser over 6 hours everyday. I choose avant browser, not chrome.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/n4v7RHMgneE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/12/13/will-chrome-be-the-best-browser-in-2011-probably-not/comment-page-1/#comment-11989</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by grace</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/otFigLyZpsY/</link>
		<dc:creator>grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11988</guid>
		<description>Why doesn't the post have avant browser? There is no memory leak, it's fast and easy to use and you can customize the interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t the post have avant browser? There is no memory leak, it&#8217;s fast and easy to use and you can customize the interface.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/otFigLyZpsY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11988</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Attackers Steal Passwords by How Passwords Get Stolen | Irreal</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/N4Tb9xD3EYk/</link>
		<dc:creator>How Passwords Get Stolen | Irreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=921#comment-11947</guid>
		<description>[...] just stumbled across a nice post on How Attackers Steal Passwords by Joe Golton over at FilterJoe. It’s an interesting look at the common attacks on user [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just stumbled across a nice post on How Attackers Steal Passwords by Joe Golton over at FilterJoe. It&#8217;s an interesting look at the common attacks on user [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/N4Tb9xD3EYk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/how-attackers-steal-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-11947</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/Gx-voVHTJ8s/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11934</guid>
		<description>Christen - Two ways to delete that I know of. For side loaded content, you connect your Nook to the computer via the USB cable. Using your computer, look at your files and select which ones to delete. That works for side loaded content, I believe.

More annoying is Barnes and Noble content which you have purchased, or, worse, has been pushed to your device as a book excerpt (an ad, really). You can easily archive it. But the only way I know of to delete is to log into your Barnes and Noble account on a computer and navigate your way to the delete option, which requires a separate click for each book you want to delete.

Here's a whole thread on Barnes and Noble's site with more details about the cumbersome deleting procedures:

http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com/t5/NOOK-First-Edition-Technical/Nook-Delete-Books/td-p/427142/page/4
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christen &#8211; Two ways to delete that I know of. For side loaded content, you connect your Nook to the computer via the USB cable. Using your computer, look at your files and select which ones to delete. That works for side loaded content, I believe.</p>
<p>More annoying is Barnes and Noble content which you have purchased, or, worse, has been pushed to your device as a book excerpt (an ad, really). You can easily archive it. But the only way I know of to delete is to log into your Barnes and Noble account on a computer and navigate your way to the delete option, which requires a separate click for each book you want to delete.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a whole thread on Barnes and Noble&#8217;s site with more details about the cumbersome deleting procedures:</p>
<p><a href="http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com/t5/NOOK-First-Edition-Technical/Nook-Delete-Books/td-p/427142/page/4" rel="nofollow">http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com/t5/NOOK-First-Edition-Technical/Nook-Delete-Books/td-p/427142/page/4</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/Gx-voVHTJ8s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11934</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by Christen</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/4JK8QKlDcf8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Christen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 03:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11931</guid>
		<description>I just got my Nook ST and I am disappointed that the sideloaded documents that I've put on it can *never* be deleted?  At least that's what I'm reading and I certainly can't find a way to do it on my own.  Does anyone have a trick or method of deleting without having to delete the file first from Calibre (which is the program I use to sideload)?  My old black and white Nook (first generation) had a convenient delete button!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got my Nook ST and I am disappointed that the sideloaded documents that I&#8217;ve put on it can *never* be deleted?  At least that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m reading and I certainly can&#8217;t find a way to do it on my own.  Does anyone have a trick or method of deleting without having to delete the file first from Calibre (which is the program I use to sideload)?  My old black and white Nook (first generation) had a convenient delete button!!!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/4JK8QKlDcf8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11931</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

