<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FilterJoe</title>
	
	<link>http://www.filterjoe.com</link>
	<description>Find what you need. Work without distraction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:17:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Filterjoecomments" /><feedburner:info uri="filterjoecomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by @aldrichdee</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/2u0BO6b8VB8/</link>
		<dc:creator>@aldrichdee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12820</guid>
		<description>On monday, February 6. I am switching to iPhone4S from BlackBerry Torch 9800. I had mine reserved from Globe Tel. Philippines and it will be ready for pick-up this monday. I have no doubt in switching 'cause I am fed up with my current device. Long reboot process, slow app opening, closing and switching, irritating blinking LED, trackpad that often gets stuck, slow web browsing and really slow camera. I can't wait to get my iPhone4S on monday!

And, about the iPhone4S battery issues, you may want to google that 'cause there are plenty of fixes that actually works. Please keep in touch and help me survive the coming days while waiting for my iPhone! Hahaha. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On monday, February 6. I am switching to iPhone4S from BlackBerry Torch 9800. I had mine reserved from Globe Tel. Philippines and it will be ready for pick-up this monday. I have no doubt in switching &#8217;cause I am fed up with my current device. Long reboot process, slow app opening, closing and switching, irritating blinking LED, trackpad that often gets stuck, slow web browsing and really slow camera. I can&#8217;t wait to get my iPhone4S on monday!</p>
<p>And, about the iPhone4S battery issues, you may want to google that &#8217;cause there are plenty of fixes that actually works. Please keep in touch and help me survive the coming days while waiting for my iPhone! Hahaha.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/2u0BO6b8VB8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12820</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Steve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/T0xwhZ_3MmE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12801</guid>
		<description>Yes pretty much agree of how web/browser development should not be going on ! Few years ago with Opera browser with some hard tweaked 56k analog dialup internet acces with speed arround to 256k (many of you wont belive it - hardware/soft/os/tcpip optimization max possible - until home telephone company has installed some CPM's on physical line/wire - juish tech to slow user down and then wanted to sell me some complette ISDN internet access with exact 2x128 kb speed and some hardware to at unbelivable high price (today this will be around 1000 euro) - 2 month salary and ) i have manage to have many web pages opened and still opening new web page on klick of a mouse ! Today i have cable broadband 6mb+ and browsing internet is horrible terrible experience ! Web browsing is consuming more resources as some heavy game written for the same hardware ! Personaly i use Opera browser as is fastest but without java script enabled ! Pages that wont open due java script i simply ignore ! What i miss today in browsers is inteligent page handling for more opened tabs ! Pretty soon we will be advise in computer shop's that for internet browsing 4 GB ram is minimum ! Smells like home supercomputer for just to do what - internet browsing ??? Someone has lost his mind or more of them !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes pretty much agree of how web/browser development should not be going on ! Few years ago with Opera browser with some hard tweaked 56k analog dialup internet acces with speed arround to 256k (many of you wont belive it &#8211; hardware/soft/os/tcpip optimization max possible &#8211; until home telephone company has installed some CPM&#8217;s on physical line/wire &#8211; juish tech to slow user down and then wanted to sell me some complette ISDN internet access with exact 2&#215;128 kb speed and some hardware to at unbelivable high price (today this will be around 1000 euro) &#8211; 2 month salary and ) i have manage to have many web pages opened and still opening new web page on klick of a mouse ! Today i have cable broadband 6mb+ and browsing internet is horrible terrible experience ! Web browsing is consuming more resources as some heavy game written for the same hardware ! Personaly i use Opera browser as is fastest but without java script enabled ! Pages that wont open due java script i simply ignore ! What i miss today in browsers is inteligent page handling for more opened tabs ! Pretty soon we will be advise in computer shop&#8217;s that for internet browsing 4 GB ram is minimum ! Smells like home supercomputer for just to do what &#8211; internet browsing ??? Someone has lost his mind or more of them !!!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/T0xwhZ_3MmE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12801</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Chris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/4Fzb7OfJx5E/</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12791</guid>
		<description>My main issue is battery life... Firefox on my Macbook Pro seems to use more memory and increases heat and fan speed, running on average 10 degrees hotter... hence using more battery power than Safari or Chrome. I'm sure though over the years Firefox will improve. I think for Windows Chrome is the best &amp; on Mac Safari is the best. While Firefox is ok on both, people who support open source will obviously use Firefox out of principal alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main issue is battery life&#8230; Firefox on my Macbook Pro seems to use more memory and increases heat and fan speed, running on average 10 degrees hotter&#8230; hence using more battery power than Safari or Chrome. I&#8217;m sure though over the years Firefox will improve. I think for Windows Chrome is the best &amp; on Mac Safari is the best. While Firefox is ok on both, people who support open source will obviously use Firefox out of principal alone.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/4Fzb7OfJx5E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12791</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Noah Tepperman</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/BKwSwoKuo40/</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Tepperman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12743</guid>
		<description>I made the switch from a Bold 9700 to iPhone 4S in Nov. 2011.
Overall, I'm happy that I made the switch, but there is one major exception in the area of calendars &amp; reminder/alert/ notification/ etc.

On my BB, I used my Calendar as a combination of a calendar and a to-do list. I had a standard 15-minute-before reminder set up, and that reminder would ring (Normal profile) or vibrate (Silent profile). I could clear or snooze any reminder.

On my iPhone, I don't find it nearly as friendly. I can't snooze ANY notification/ reminder/ alert for anything from my calendar, and if I don't happen to catch a reminder when it pops up, I often miss it altogether.

I've been trying to figure out a better way to set things up, but so far I'm not having any luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made the switch from a Bold 9700 to iPhone 4S in Nov. 2011.<br />
Overall, I&#8217;m happy that I made the switch, but there is one major exception in the area of calendars &amp; reminder/alert/ notification/ etc.</p>
<p>On my BB, I used my Calendar as a combination of a calendar and a to-do list. I had a standard 15-minute-before reminder set up, and that reminder would ring (Normal profile) or vibrate (Silent profile). I could clear or snooze any reminder.</p>
<p>On my iPhone, I don&#8217;t find it nearly as friendly. I can&#8217;t snooze ANY notification/ reminder/ alert for anything from my calendar, and if I don&#8217;t happen to catch a reminder when it pops up, I often miss it altogether.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out a better way to set things up, but so far I&#8217;m not having any luck.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/BKwSwoKuo40" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12743</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Monitor Setup to Reduce Eye Fatigue and Distraction by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/U5jKx8Jtf7I/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1896#comment-12574</guid>
		<description>Martin- The anti glare coating is my least favorite aspect of my Dell monitor. I did get used to it after a few weeks. I needed to turn up the brightness much higher than I do with other monitors and that took care of it for me. I do have a window in my office and the anti-glare coating is effective when the sun shines bright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin- The anti glare coating is my least favorite aspect of my Dell monitor. I did get used to it after a few weeks. I needed to turn up the brightness much higher than I do with other monitors and that took care of it for me. I do have a window in my office and the anti-glare coating is effective when the sun shines bright.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/U5jKx8Jtf7I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/26/the-best-monitor-setup-to-reduce-eye-fatigue-and-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-12574</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Monitor Setup to Reduce Eye Fatigue and Distraction by Martin</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/E-Kftww-9ow/</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1896#comment-12572</guid>
		<description>Dear Joe

I was wondering regarding your monitor of choice, have you not been disturbed by the heavy anti glare coating of the Dell monitor? I have just purchased Dell U2212HM yesterday and I feel a little uneasy as to wether or not I can get used to the anti glare coating that brings this graininess/sparkling effect especially on white backgrounds. Like you, I also will be using the monitor for reading, thus spending most time reading pdf's or word documents with black text on white background. 

Have you overcome the anti glare coating? :-)

Cheers
Martin, Denmark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Joe</p>
<p>I was wondering regarding your monitor of choice, have you not been disturbed by the heavy anti glare coating of the Dell monitor? I have just purchased Dell U2212HM yesterday and I feel a little uneasy as to wether or not I can get used to the anti glare coating that brings this graininess/sparkling effect especially on white backgrounds. Like you, I also will be using the monitor for reading, thus spending most time reading pdf&#8217;s or word documents with black text on white background. </p>
<p>Have you overcome the anti glare coating? <img src='http://www.filterjoe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Martin, Denmark</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/E-Kftww-9ow" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/26/the-best-monitor-setup-to-reduce-eye-fatigue-and-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-12572</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/2j5_KZBs75Y/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12516</guid>
		<description>Brian - I can totally understand your point of view - a view which I shared for the last few years as I shook my head in disbelief that people were willing to live with such horrible voice quality on their phone, not to mention poor battery life and data usage. But, as I mentioned in detail in my post, the iPhone 4s has reached adequate in these areas (except for voice quality with earbuds) and of course it's a great pocket computer and camera. It also turned out to be considerably less expensive for me.

But a broader point with cell phones in general is that what works for one person won't work for another. I tried hard to lay out what worked and what didn't on the iPhone in the areas where Blackberry is traditionally strong - and continues to be strong. Armed with that information, some considering the 9900 vs. the 4s will choose one model, some the other. As I mentioned in my conclusion, I would have gone with the 9900 if I were in a profession that required frequent voice calls and messaging throughout the day, such as a real estate agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; I can totally understand your point of view &#8211; a view which I shared for the last few years as I shook my head in disbelief that people were willing to live with such horrible voice quality on their phone, not to mention poor battery life and data usage. But, as I mentioned in detail in my post, the iPhone 4s has reached adequate in these areas (except for voice quality with earbuds) and of course it&#8217;s a great pocket computer and camera. It also turned out to be considerably less expensive for me.</p>
<p>But a broader point with cell phones in general is that what works for one person won&#8217;t work for another. I tried hard to lay out what worked and what didn&#8217;t on the iPhone in the areas where Blackberry is traditionally strong &#8211; and continues to be strong. Armed with that information, some considering the 9900 vs. the 4s will choose one model, some the other. As I mentioned in my conclusion, I would have gone with the 9900 if I were in a profession that required frequent voice calls and messaging throughout the day, such as a real estate agent.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/2j5_KZBs75Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12516</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Brian</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/Q29vij_eHb4/</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12512</guid>
		<description>So you replaced a phone that was released in fall 2009 with a 2 year newer device, gave up the freedom of actually having a mobile device that can make it through the day without an extra charging, good audio quality, notifications, profiles, superior data usage, UMA, for a pocket computer that is a mediocre phone and are happy about it?  I just don't understand i guess.
The 9900 would have given you the speed and browser you like, with every other benefit of having a berry.  It has UMA now also..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you replaced a phone that was released in fall 2009 with a 2 year newer device, gave up the freedom of actually having a mobile device that can make it through the day without an extra charging, good audio quality, notifications, profiles, superior data usage, UMA, for a pocket computer that is a mediocre phone and are happy about it?  I just don&#8217;t understand i guess.<br />
The 9900 would have given you the speed and browser you like, with every other benefit of having a berry.  It has UMA now also..</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/Q29vij_eHb4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12512</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/meBvA1Lg9Jk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-12380</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your comments, David. I had the Kindle Touch for a month and found it so difficult to use that I returned it - and I am not alone as I see that reviews for the Kindle Touch are quite mixed. So now I too have the inexpensive ($79) Kindle 4. I agree with your comments. My biggest frustration with the Nook is that I can only easily use it to read books. I use Instapaper a bit and that means I use my Kindle for all the non-book reading. But I still much prefer the form factor and use of use of the Nook Simple Touch for simply reading a book. They did a good job of figuring out how to combine touch with an E-reader, unlike Amazon with its Kindle Touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your comments, David. I had the Kindle Touch for a month and found it so difficult to use that I returned it &#8211; and I am not alone as I see that reviews for the Kindle Touch are quite mixed. So now I too have the inexpensive ($79) Kindle 4. I agree with your comments. My biggest frustration with the Nook is that I can only easily use it to read books. I use Instapaper a bit and that means I use my Kindle for all the non-book reading. But I still much prefer the form factor and use of use of the Nook Simple Touch for simply reading a book. They did a good job of figuring out how to combine touch with an E-reader, unlike Amazon with its Kindle Touch.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/meBvA1Lg9Jk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-12380</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by David Crane</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/HDoWCIEwUlU/</link>
		<dc:creator>David Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-12378</guid>
		<description>I own the Nook Simple Touch and the lowest end new Kindle, sponsored and not with touch screen.  Ergonomically, the Nook wins hands down for me.  It feels best in my hand, and feels much more solid than the Kindle.  The only downside, physically, is that its slightly wider body makes it larger than my jacket pocket, while the kindle fits there nicely. That gives the Kindle an advantage when I am going out, and taking my ereader in case I have a reading opportunity.

There are, from my perspective, three important downsides for the nook.  First, arranging books into shelves, or collections in Kindle's parlance, is much more painful than on a Kindle.  When I create a shelf, I load book on it by entering an edit mode, then scrolling through all of my books until I find one(s) I want to add to the shelf.  That's OK until I have 35 pages of books to scroll through, and want one that starts with a letter that is later in the alphabet.  

Second, Nook does not offer a way to get samples and side-loaded books off the Kindle without connecting to my PC.  

Finally, B&amp;N's bookstore occasionally does some weird things on pricing.  Normally, I can count on B&amp;N books being a bit more expensive than on Amazon, and about the same as from the Sony and Google bookstores.  Every once in awhile their pricing is way out of line.  One book I wanted to buy was priced at $7.99 on Amazon, $8.99 on Sony and Google, and $16.08 on B&amp;N.  I am willing to pay a modest premium to get a book on my Nook, but not $7 - $8 relative to non-Amazon vendors.  So with that case, B&amp;N made me a price shopper, especially after their support told me that B&amp;N has no control over pricing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own the Nook Simple Touch and the lowest end new Kindle, sponsored and not with touch screen.  Ergonomically, the Nook wins hands down for me.  It feels best in my hand, and feels much more solid than the Kindle.  The only downside, physically, is that its slightly wider body makes it larger than my jacket pocket, while the kindle fits there nicely. That gives the Kindle an advantage when I am going out, and taking my ereader in case I have a reading opportunity.</p>
<p>There are, from my perspective, three important downsides for the nook.  First, arranging books into shelves, or collections in Kindle&#8217;s parlance, is much more painful than on a Kindle.  When I create a shelf, I load book on it by entering an edit mode, then scrolling through all of my books until I find one(s) I want to add to the shelf.  That&#8217;s OK until I have 35 pages of books to scroll through, and want one that starts with a letter that is later in the alphabet.  </p>
<p>Second, Nook does not offer a way to get samples and side-loaded books off the Kindle without connecting to my PC.  </p>
<p>Finally, B&amp;N&#8217;s bookstore occasionally does some weird things on pricing.  Normally, I can count on B&amp;N books being a bit more expensive than on Amazon, and about the same as from the Sony and Google bookstores.  Every once in awhile their pricing is way out of line.  One book I wanted to buy was priced at $7.99 on Amazon, $8.99 on Sony and Google, and $16.08 on B&amp;N.  I am willing to pay a modest premium to get a book on my Nook, but not $7 &#8211; $8 relative to non-Amazon vendors.  So with that case, B&amp;N made me a price shopper, especially after their support told me that B&amp;N has no control over pricing.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/HDoWCIEwUlU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-12378</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by JP</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/eeZCd8o6BLk/</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12314</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your in-depth review.  But are you sure you want to call Firefox "memory-efficient"?  I don't think even the folks at Firefox believe that! (LOL). A freshly launched Firefox hogs more than 3 times as much memory as Opera or Chrome on my system. After some surfing, this number climbs....

In any case, the only browser that no longer annoys me is Opera.  Everything else seems to either be unstable, bloated, lacking in user control, or just plain gimmicky. (Sadly, these are not mutually exclusive categories.)  I really do hope the people at Mozilla can get their house in order again, because Firefox was my favourite for years. In my opinion they destroyed it with this new rapid development cycle that makes browser updates outpace addon updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your in-depth review.  But are you sure you want to call Firefox &#8220;memory-efficient&#8221;?  I don&#8217;t think even the folks at Firefox believe that! (LOL). A freshly launched Firefox hogs more than 3 times as much memory as Opera or Chrome on my system. After some surfing, this number climbs&#8230;.</p>
<p>In any case, the only browser that no longer annoys me is Opera.  Everything else seems to either be unstable, bloated, lacking in user control, or just plain gimmicky. (Sadly, these are not mutually exclusive categories.)  I really do hope the people at Mozilla can get their house in order again, because Firefox was my favourite for years. In my opinion they destroyed it with this new rapid development cycle that makes browser updates outpace addon updates.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/eeZCd8o6BLk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12314</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by sourabh</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/jtmrU-pwNGI/</link>
		<dc:creator>sourabh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12230</guid>
		<description>You might want to check out Safari 5 on a Mac that has OS 10.5 or greater. Apple just updated it to fix some bugs and security issues. We have two Macs. My 7-year old G4 laptop with OS 10.4 (Tiger) doesn’t support Safari 5, but Safari 4 is faster than the latest version of Firefox, and meets all my needs. As of yesterday we have the latest version of Safari 5 on our iMac, OS 10.5, but I haven’t had a chance to try it out yet.

The problem is, as you pointed out, the browsers change so frequently that any comparison is likely to be out of date before you can publish it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to check out Safari 5 on a Mac that has OS 10.5 or greater. Apple just updated it to fix some bugs and security issues. We have two Macs. My 7-year old G4 laptop with OS 10.4 (Tiger) doesn’t support Safari 5, but Safari 4 is faster than the latest version of Firefox, and meets all my needs. As of yesterday we have the latest version of Safari 5 on our iMac, OS 10.5, but I haven’t had a chance to try it out yet.</p>
<p>The problem is, as you pointed out, the browsers change so frequently that any comparison is likely to be out of date before you can publish it.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/jtmrU-pwNGI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12230</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Password Manager? by Alex</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/s4eKtPUHHuQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=912#comment-12212</guid>
		<description>I’d add netwrix password manager  (www.netwrix.com) to this list as well. It‘s really easy for users to set up, and allows my end users to reset forgotten passwords without calling the helpdesk. I know the tool is also available in a freeware version for up to 40 or 50 end users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d add netwrix password manager  (www.netwrix.com) to this list as well. It‘s really easy for users to set up, and allows my end users to reset forgotten passwords without calling the helpdesk. I know the tool is also available in a freeware version for up to 40 or 50 end users.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/s4eKtPUHHuQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/which-password-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-12212</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/alnT41dh3rk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-12198</guid>
		<description>I love Firefox, but version 9 is quite a bit annoying.  You might tell me that I installed this version within the 2 months you recommend to wait instead of after them, but I was upgrading from a much older version.  Now, when I go to a theme site, it will download a theme, but then give me an error when trying to install it, saying that it "could not be installed because Firefox cannot modify the needed file".  What does that mean, and what can I do to install a theme?  Dragging the downloaded theme from my Desktop into the Extensions tab as one site suggested also gave me an error message that it couldn't be installed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Firefox, but version 9 is quite a bit annoying.  You might tell me that I installed this version within the 2 months you recommend to wait instead of after them, but I was upgrading from a much older version.  Now, when I go to a theme site, it will download a theme, but then give me an error when trying to install it, saying that it &#8220;could not be installed because Firefox cannot modify the needed file&#8221;.  What does that mean, and what can I do to install a theme?  Dragging the downloaded theme from my Desktop into the Extensions tab as one site suggested also gave me an error message that it couldn&#8217;t be installed.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/alnT41dh3rk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12198</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Sugel</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/a7ITtcfaH3E/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 06:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-12177</guid>
		<description>Summary: When I replaced my phone the second time with Apple it was still producing static and a ringing sound in the car. The guy I talked to at Car Toys said this was a major flaw with only the iPhone 4s (not iPhone 4, iPhone 3gs etc.) and that they are getting in around a person a day complaining about this problem. They confirmed that it was NOT a speaker, cable or stereo problem that the Genius Bar guy thought it would be. This issue only occurs in cars and potentially portable speakers since this is a grounding issue (home speakers will be fine). I am an Apple Fanboy and am not trying to hate on their quality products, but this was a pretty big deal to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summary: When I replaced my phone the second time with Apple it was still producing static and a ringing sound in the car. The guy I talked to at Car Toys said this was a major flaw with only the iPhone 4s (not iPhone 4, iPhone 3gs etc.) and that they are getting in around a person a day complaining about this problem. They confirmed that it was NOT a speaker, cable or stereo problem that the Genius Bar guy thought it would be. This issue only occurs in cars and potentially portable speakers since this is a grounding issue (home speakers will be fine). I am an Apple Fanboy and am not trying to hate on their quality products, but this was a pretty big deal to me.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/a7ITtcfaH3E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-12177</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by JimmyH</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/d2zK1ba9-sM/</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-12144</guid>
		<description>I received my Simple Touch for Christmas and loved it. Then it autmatically downloaded the 1.1.0 update and now I cannot connect to my home wifi. B&amp;N told me I need to update my router settings. I do not want to do this for fear of causing problems with my other devices (laptop, iPhone, etc.). It was working fine before the update. B&amp;N really needs to address this problem soon. In the meantime, I'll connect through hotspots as needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received my Simple Touch for Christmas and loved it. Then it autmatically downloaded the 1.1.0 update and now I cannot connect to my home wifi. B&amp;N told me I need to update my router settings. I do not want to do this for fear of causing problems with my other devices (laptop, iPhone, etc.). It was working fine before the update. B&amp;N really needs to address this problem soon. In the meantime, I&#8217;ll connect through hotspots as needed.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/d2zK1ba9-sM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-12144</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/cWQvCWL6K6s/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 19:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-12067</guid>
		<description>Yan - The Kindle Fire is a color tablet while the Nook Simple Touch is a Black and White E Ink e-reader, so I'm not getting what you're after with your comment. A fair comparison is the Nook Simple Touch vs. the various Kindle E Ink devices such as the Kindle Keyboard, Kindle Touch, or the $79 Kindle. If you read through my post carefully, you'll see that my comments and conclusion are mixed. I prefer the hardware design and user interface of the Nook Simple Touch, but I much prefer the Kindle platform thanks to superior sync and ease of getting content onto the devices.

I have tried altogether 6 different reading devices and 4 of them are Kindles. Of all the Kindles, my favorite is the least expensive one without touch or keyboard. I found the Kindle Touch so difficult to use that I returned it.

I haven't tried any of the color readers from Amazon or Barnes and Noble.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yan &#8211; The Kindle Fire is a color tablet while the Nook Simple Touch is a Black and White E Ink e-reader, so I&#8217;m not getting what you&#8217;re after with your comment. A fair comparison is the Nook Simple Touch vs. the various Kindle E Ink devices such as the Kindle Keyboard, Kindle Touch, or the $79 Kindle. If you read through my post carefully, you&#8217;ll see that my comments and conclusion are mixed. I prefer the hardware design and user interface of the Nook Simple Touch, but I much prefer the Kindle platform thanks to superior sync and ease of getting content onto the devices.</p>
<p>I have tried altogether 6 different reading devices and 4 of them are Kindles. Of all the Kindles, my favorite is the least expensive one without touch or keyboard. I found the Kindle Touch so difficult to use that I returned it.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tried any of the color readers from Amazon or Barnes and Noble.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/cWQvCWL6K6s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-12067</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which is the Best E-reader? The Nook Simple Touch? by Yan Kwok</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/nSy4qfkONlg/</link>
		<dc:creator>Yan Kwok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 06:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2344#comment-12050</guid>
		<description>I find this article kind-of biased, the writer even says that he owns a Nook. With the new Kindle Fire out, I find that the Kindle is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this article kind-of biased, the writer even says that he owns a Nook. With the new Kindle Fire out, I find that the Kindle is better.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/nSy4qfkONlg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/09/28/which-is-the-best-e-reader-the-nook-simple-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-12050</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Chrome be the Best Browser in 2011? Probably Not . . . by grace</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/n4v7RHMgneE/</link>
		<dc:creator>grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1762#comment-11989</guid>
		<description>i just switched from chrome to avant browser. So far so good. Avant is more stable but chrome is faster. I use a browser over 6 hours everyday. I choose avant browser, not chrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just switched from chrome to avant browser. So far so good. Avant is more stable but chrome is faster. I use a browser over 6 hours everyday. I choose avant browser, not chrome.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/n4v7RHMgneE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/12/13/will-chrome-be-the-best-browser-in-2011-probably-not/comment-page-1/#comment-11989</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by grace</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/otFigLyZpsY/</link>
		<dc:creator>grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11988</guid>
		<description>Why doesn't the post have avant browser? There is no memory leak, it's fast and easy to use and you can customize the interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t the post have avant browser? There is no memory leak, it&#8217;s fast and easy to use and you can customize the interface.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/otFigLyZpsY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11988</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Attackers Steal Passwords by How Passwords Get Stolen | Irreal</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/N4Tb9xD3EYk/</link>
		<dc:creator>How Passwords Get Stolen | Irreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=921#comment-11947</guid>
		<description>[...] just stumbled across a nice post on How Attackers Steal Passwords by Joe Golton over at FilterJoe. It’s an interesting look at the common attacks on user [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just stumbled across a nice post on How Attackers Steal Passwords by Joe Golton over at FilterJoe. It&#8217;s an interesting look at the common attacks on user [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/N4Tb9xD3EYk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/how-attackers-steal-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-11947</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/Gx-voVHTJ8s/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11934</guid>
		<description>Christen - Two ways to delete that I know of. For side loaded content, you connect your Nook to the computer via the USB cable. Using your computer, look at your files and select which ones to delete. That works for side loaded content, I believe.

More annoying is Barnes and Noble content which you have purchased, or, worse, has been pushed to your device as a book excerpt (an ad, really). You can easily archive it. But the only way I know of to delete is to log into your Barnes and Noble account on a computer and navigate your way to the delete option, which requires a separate click for each book you want to delete.

Here's a whole thread on Barnes and Noble's site with more details about the cumbersome deleting procedures:

http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com/t5/NOOK-First-Edition-Technical/Nook-Delete-Books/td-p/427142/page/4
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christen &#8211; Two ways to delete that I know of. For side loaded content, you connect your Nook to the computer via the USB cable. Using your computer, look at your files and select which ones to delete. That works for side loaded content, I believe.</p>
<p>More annoying is Barnes and Noble content which you have purchased, or, worse, has been pushed to your device as a book excerpt (an ad, really). You can easily archive it. But the only way I know of to delete is to log into your Barnes and Noble account on a computer and navigate your way to the delete option, which requires a separate click for each book you want to delete.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a whole thread on Barnes and Noble&#8217;s site with more details about the cumbersome deleting procedures:</p>
<p><a href="http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com/t5/NOOK-First-Edition-Technical/Nook-Delete-Books/td-p/427142/page/4" rel="nofollow">http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com/t5/NOOK-First-Edition-Technical/Nook-Delete-Books/td-p/427142/page/4</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/Gx-voVHTJ8s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11934</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by Christen</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/4JK8QKlDcf8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Christen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 03:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11931</guid>
		<description>I just got my Nook ST and I am disappointed that the sideloaded documents that I've put on it can *never* be deleted?  At least that's what I'm reading and I certainly can't find a way to do it on my own.  Does anyone have a trick or method of deleting without having to delete the file first from Calibre (which is the program I use to sideload)?  My old black and white Nook (first generation) had a convenient delete button!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got my Nook ST and I am disappointed that the sideloaded documents that I&#8217;ve put on it can *never* be deleted?  At least that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m reading and I certainly can&#8217;t find a way to do it on my own.  Does anyone have a trick or method of deleting without having to delete the file first from Calibre (which is the program I use to sideload)?  My old black and white Nook (first generation) had a convenient delete button!!!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/4JK8QKlDcf8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11931</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/KHYCfcugFbk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 17:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-11922</guid>
		<description>Terry - you're welcome!

Yael - iPhone 5 rumors have been circulating all year about a possible redesign of the phone with a slightly larger display, near field communication (NFC), 4G (LTE), and other features which come and go depending on the latest rumor. My feeling is that if the iPhone 4s meets your needs, get it. If it doesn't, don't. In the U.S., you can always get a new phone at the fully subsidized rate once every 22 months, so it's not as if you're stuck with a phone forever.

One thing I prefer about iPhones compared with Android is that Apple has consistently supported their devices with bug fixes and additional features through operating systems updates for at least 3 years. So if you purchase the iPhone 4s in early 2012 you can expect that it will be able to run the latest version of iOS through the end of 2014 at least. Here's an infographic that illustrates this disparity between iOS and Android:

http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/27/charted-android-fragmentation/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry &#8211; you&#8217;re welcome!</p>
<p>Yael &#8211; iPhone 5 rumors have been circulating all year about a possible redesign of the phone with a slightly larger display, near field communication (NFC), 4G (LTE), and other features which come and go depending on the latest rumor. My feeling is that if the iPhone 4s meets your needs, get it. If it doesn&#8217;t, don&#8217;t. In the U.S., you can always get a new phone at the fully subsidized rate once every 22 months, so it&#8217;s not as if you&#8217;re stuck with a phone forever.</p>
<p>One thing I prefer about iPhones compared with Android is that Apple has consistently supported their devices with bug fixes and additional features through operating systems updates for at least 3 years. So if you purchase the iPhone 4s in early 2012 you can expect that it will be able to run the latest version of iOS through the end of 2014 at least. Here&#8217;s an infographic that illustrates this disparity between iOS and Android:</p>
<p><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/27/charted-android-fragmentation/" rel="nofollow">http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/27/charted-android-fragmentation/</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/KHYCfcugFbk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-11922</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Terry Cole</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/bSsz4Ad7YSA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 01:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-11909</guid>
		<description>Excellent review. Thank you for taking the time to prepare and post this terrific articulation of your experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent review. Thank you for taking the time to prepare and post this terrific articulation of your experience.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/bSsz4Ad7YSA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-11909</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs iPhone 4s (After Two Months of Use) by Yael Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/Iaq9ms9zm7Y/</link>
		<dc:creator>Yael Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2430#comment-11885</guid>
		<description>I am tempted to get the iPhone 4s, or should I wait to get the iPhone 5?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am tempted to get the iPhone 4s, or should I wait to get the iPhone 5?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/Iaq9ms9zm7Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/12/23/blackberry-vs-iphone-4s-after-two-months-of-use/comment-page-1/#comment-11885</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Page Reformatting Services Readable and Readability by Sarah</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/jcqmwS3J1_A/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2035#comment-11819</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for your reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for your reply.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/jcqmwS3J1_A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/04/11/web-page-reformatting-services-readable-and-readability/comment-page-1/#comment-11819</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Page Reformatting Services Readable and Readability by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/_zahfHXa5DQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2035#comment-11810</guid>
		<description>Hi Sarah - You have a great question and I wrestled with this very question when I first started using these services a couple years ago. arc90 has a brand to protect as they are an organization with over a dozen employees and they've done many projects. So I've always trusted Readability because of that. As for Readable, I actually had a friend of mine who is a security professional check it out and he did some testing and analysis on the version that came out in 2009. I've also exchanged a number of emails with the author of Readable. Also - Readable was recently acquired by Evernote, an even more popular brand.

I don't personally have the skill set to analyze the code of either of these myself but I'm satisfied both of the organizations behind these services are great organizations that have nothing to gain by being unclear with their users about how they're using the data gathered. They certainly need to have knowledge of which posts you are reformatting - so that's something to be aware of.

Note also that you can use Safari (both desktop and mobile versions), which now has a version of readability built into the browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sarah &#8211; You have a great question and I wrestled with this very question when I first started using these services a couple years ago. arc90 has a brand to protect as they are an organization with over a dozen employees and they&#8217;ve done many projects. So I&#8217;ve always trusted Readability because of that. As for Readable, I actually had a friend of mine who is a security professional check it out and he did some testing and analysis on the version that came out in 2009. I&#8217;ve also exchanged a number of emails with the author of Readable. Also &#8211; Readable was recently acquired by Evernote, an even more popular brand.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t personally have the skill set to analyze the code of either of these myself but I&#8217;m satisfied both of the organizations behind these services are great organizations that have nothing to gain by being unclear with their users about how they&#8217;re using the data gathered. They certainly need to have knowledge of which posts you are reformatting &#8211; so that&#8217;s something to be aware of.</p>
<p>Note also that you can use Safari (both desktop and mobile versions), which now has a version of readability built into the browser.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/_zahfHXa5DQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/04/11/web-page-reformatting-services-readable-and-readability/comment-page-1/#comment-11810</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Page Reformatting Services Readable and Readability by Sarah</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/Oem7oSApCdY/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2035#comment-11798</guid>
		<description>Hi, I've though about installing one of these but when it comes to it you get a message that the software can access all your data on all sites.

Are you concerned about security?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;ve though about installing one of these but when it comes to it you get a message that the software can access all your data on all sites.</p>
<p>Are you concerned about security?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/Oem7oSApCdY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/04/11/web-page-reformatting-services-readable-and-readability/comment-page-1/#comment-11798</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Monitor Setup to Reduce Eye Fatigue and Distraction by optician</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/FyVo_f2xr1k/</link>
		<dc:creator>optician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1896#comment-11785</guid>
		<description>For my part, I make sure that my monitor is atleast an arm's away from my eyes. Then I lower the brightness and sharpness on the setting. Lastly, I have an anti-glare / radiation cover on the monitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my part, I make sure that my monitor is atleast an arm&#8217;s away from my eyes. Then I lower the brightness and sharpness on the setting. Lastly, I have an anti-glare / radiation cover on the monitor.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/FyVo_f2xr1k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/26/the-best-monitor-setup-to-reduce-eye-fatigue-and-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-11785</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by Phillip</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/PYXwubD0JcQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11744</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this analysis of the firmware update. I just purchased a Nook ST and am going to wait on updating to 1.1.0 when I have a better sense of the value of the browser.

Regarding pdfs, I am somewhat displeased with what I've seen so far. I've sideloaded a few articles with reflowable text, and while the font resizing was successful, for some reason the reader does not allow me to *press down* on the text in order to highlight, look up definitions, or take notes. This will be a serious drawback if I am unable to take notes, as all of my pdfs are articles requiring my occasional mark-ups. Anyone else find this issue, and a way to resolve it?

I may eventually decide to root, in order to utilize a better pdf-reading program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this analysis of the firmware update. I just purchased a Nook ST and am going to wait on updating to 1.1.0 when I have a better sense of the value of the browser.</p>
<p>Regarding pdfs, I am somewhat displeased with what I&#8217;ve seen so far. I&#8217;ve sideloaded a few articles with reflowable text, and while the font resizing was successful, for some reason the reader does not allow me to *press down* on the text in order to highlight, look up definitions, or take notes. This will be a serious drawback if I am unable to take notes, as all of my pdfs are articles requiring my occasional mark-ups. Anyone else find this issue, and a way to resolve it?</p>
<p>I may eventually decide to root, in order to utilize a better pdf-reading program.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/PYXwubD0JcQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11744</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/rCDJNHKzjG8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11629</guid>
		<description>Richard,

Opera is your best bet. I have a Windows 98 Machine that runs Opera 9.64 at a reasonable speed, though I haven't turned it on in nearly 2 years. It has 384MB. I am certain that Opera 9.64 would run easily on your machine, and I think there's a good chance the latest version of Opera 10 would run fine as well. Starting with Opera 11, Opera seems to use more memory with multiple tabs open. The minimum listed requirements for XP are 256MB but I'm guessing that means it will start fine but then require frequent open and closing of the browser if you use more than 1 tab.

I love that you're using a decade old Windows PC! However, you should buy a replacement no later than 2014, when updates for Windows XP officially end, meaning no more security patches.

These days memory for today's systems is incredibly cheap. I bought a Lenovo ThinkPad Edge e520 with an Intel i5 inside earlier this year that came bundled with 4GB of RAM. To future proof myself, I spent less than $20 to get an additional 4GB of RAM. I think it will be a very long time before 8GB is considered low!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>Opera is your best bet. I have a Windows 98 Machine that runs Opera 9.64 at a reasonable speed, though I haven&#8217;t turned it on in nearly 2 years. It has 384MB. I am certain that Opera 9.64 would run easily on your machine, and I think there&#8217;s a good chance the latest version of Opera 10 would run fine as well. Starting with Opera 11, Opera seems to use more memory with multiple tabs open. The minimum listed requirements for XP are 256MB but I&#8217;m guessing that means it will start fine but then require frequent open and closing of the browser if you use more than 1 tab.</p>
<p>I love that you&#8217;re using a decade old Windows PC! However, you should buy a replacement no later than 2014, when updates for Windows XP officially end, meaning no more security patches.</p>
<p>These days memory for today&#8217;s systems is incredibly cheap. I bought a Lenovo ThinkPad Edge e520 with an Intel i5 inside earlier this year that came bundled with 4GB of RAM. To future proof myself, I spent less than $20 to get an additional 4GB of RAM. I think it will be a very long time before 8GB is considered low!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/rCDJNHKzjG8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11629</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Rich</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/hMXl7uhjc5c/</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11626</guid>
		<description>Joe, nice writing!  And very generous of you to share your thoughts.

I am running a XP on a Dell laptop which is even older than the oldest machine you're using that was mentioned in the article.  Unfortunately, memory on this PC is constrained to a max. of 384MB(!).  Yes, XP was designed to be happy running on a PC with 256MB or even 128MB of memory!!!  Now with 8 - 9 years past many Windows 'improvements' (XP3, etc.) performance has lagged, though I did a 'fresh' install of XP this year.

I am a fan of Chrome &amp; use it on other machines.  My question, then, is 'what is the most efficient browser - or browser configuration - for use on this machine'?  I am talking 'lean &amp; mean'; a minimalist sort of approach ...?  Any thoughts?  (Thanks!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, nice writing!  And very generous of you to share your thoughts.</p>
<p>I am running a XP on a Dell laptop which is even older than the oldest machine you&#8217;re using that was mentioned in the article.  Unfortunately, memory on this PC is constrained to a max. of 384MB(!).  Yes, XP was designed to be happy running on a PC with 256MB or even 128MB of memory!!!  Now with 8 &#8211; 9 years past many Windows &#8216;improvements&#8217; (XP3, etc.) performance has lagged, though I did a &#8216;fresh&#8217; install of XP this year.</p>
<p>I am a fan of Chrome &#038; use it on other machines.  My question, then, is &#8216;what is the most efficient browser &#8211; or browser configuration &#8211; for use on this machine&#8217;?  I am talking &#8216;lean &#038; mean&#8217;; a minimalist sort of approach &#8230;?  Any thoughts?  (Thanks!)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/hMXl7uhjc5c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11626</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Mark</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/NkcwhXg1ZAA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11562</guid>
		<description>Maxthon 3 - No mention of it here and it is brilliant.
Quick to load, has many features of other browser ie speed dial etc some nice features like nightmode (dulls screen to save eye strain) and many features that are actually useful and not gimmicks.

Give it a go</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxthon 3 &#8211; No mention of it here and it is brilliant.<br />
Quick to load, has many features of other browser ie speed dial etc some nice features like nightmode (dulls screen to save eye strain) and many features that are actually useful and not gimmicks.</p>
<p>Give it a go</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/NkcwhXg1ZAA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11562</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackberry vs. iPhone: No Longer a Contest by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/puaeaQ1ROT8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2374#comment-11540</guid>
		<description>They are both great devices, I'm blessed enough to own both the Blackberry 9900 &amp; iPhone 4s on AT&amp;T.
The email and and calendar on the 9900 is still better than the iPhone. Surfing the web and app quality is better on the iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are both great devices, I&#8217;m blessed enough to own both the Blackberry 9900 &#038; iPhone 4s on AT&#038;T.<br />
The email and and calendar on the 9900 is still better than the iPhone. Surfing the web and app quality is better on the iPhone.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/puaeaQ1ROT8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/10/19/blackberry-vs-iphone-no-longer-a-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-11540</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by thexfiles123</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/FMgxVXE6I7g/</link>
		<dc:creator>thexfiles123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 01:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11490</guid>
		<description>I very much prefer Firefox over Chrome, but Chrome is always second best in my opinion and Opera is third.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much prefer Firefox over Chrome, but Chrome is always second best in my opinion and Opera is third.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/FMgxVXE6I7g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11490</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/SpWE7iTL3Ag/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11488</guid>
		<description>Scott - I get notified within minutes on my phone every time posts a comment and you happened to catch me with a moment free earlier today. Comodo certainly has a good reputation which is a big plus, but of course that doesn't guarantee anything. Perhaps with my next browser review update (hopefully within the next 2 months), I'll try to test and/or find out more about Comodo Dragon.

I haven't personally tested Avant, Maxthon, or any other browser with market share below 0.5%. The 5 browsers I profiled in the post collectively have over 99% market share in web traffic, so it's not worth the effort to examine others.

A problem for all browsers with small market share (unless they're a closely related fork of one of the top 4 browsers) is that web app services like Google and Yahoo don't put in much (if any) effort to ensure their apps are compatible. Even Opera, a browser I love in many ways, receives poor support from some web app makers (i.e. Google) because it has less than 2% market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; I get notified within minutes on my phone every time posts a comment and you happened to catch me with a moment free earlier today. Comodo certainly has a good reputation which is a big plus, but of course that doesn&#8217;t guarantee anything. Perhaps with my next browser review update (hopefully within the next 2 months), I&#8217;ll try to test and/or find out more about Comodo Dragon.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t personally tested Avant, Maxthon, or any other browser with market share below 0.5%. The 5 browsers I profiled in the post collectively have over 99% market share in web traffic, so it&#8217;s not worth the effort to examine others.</p>
<p>A problem for all browsers with small market share (unless they&#8217;re a closely related fork of one of the top 4 browsers) is that web app services like Google and Yahoo don&#8217;t put in much (if any) effort to ensure their apps are compatible. Even Opera, a browser I love in many ways, receives poor support from some web app makers (i.e. Google) because it has less than 2% market share.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/SpWE7iTL3Ag" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11488</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Scott</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/pmaNH-ZPy2U/</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11485</guid>
		<description>Joe,

Wow !  Talk about a lightning fast response !  Thanks !

Yes, I read your links on Iron with interest.  That's what made me curious about any opinion you had on Comodo's privacy-conscious version of Chrome, since that one is from a company with a more long-standing and good reputation behind it, no ?

Btw, how do you feel about the more "front end" type of browser ?  E.g. Avant, Maxthon, etc. ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>Wow !  Talk about a lightning fast response !  Thanks !</p>
<p>Yes, I read your links on Iron with interest.  That&#8217;s what made me curious about any opinion you had on Comodo&#8217;s privacy-conscious version of Chrome, since that one is from a company with a more long-standing and good reputation behind it, no ?</p>
<p>Btw, how do you feel about the more &#8220;front end&#8221; type of browser ?  E.g. Avant, Maxthon, etc. ?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/pmaNH-ZPy2U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11485</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/SXVa6Qsaz_U/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11484</guid>
		<description>Scott - I haven't tested the Comodo Dragon browser and don't know anything about it beyond what &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comodo_Dragon_(web_browser)" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wikipedia says&lt;/a&gt;. I can understand the temptation to want a browser that has Chrome's features without all the Google tracking, but at least one prior effort in this regard (SRWare Iron) is surrounded by controversy, as I noted in the Chrome section of the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; I haven&#8217;t tested the Comodo Dragon browser and don&#8217;t know anything about it beyond what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comodo_Dragon_(web_browser)" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia says</a>. I can understand the temptation to want a browser that has Chrome&#8217;s features without all the Google tracking, but at least one prior effort in this regard (SRWare Iron) is surrounded by controversy, as I noted in the Chrome section of the post.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/SXVa6Qsaz_U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11484</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Scott</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/1axcYvpFtrc/</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11483</guid>
		<description>How do you feel about Comodo's Dragon browser (based on Chrome) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you feel about Comodo&#8217;s Dragon browser (based on Chrome) ?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/1axcYvpFtrc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11483</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Password Manager? by Eric</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/chR2LtpI1Vw/</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=912#comment-11393</guid>
		<description>I use Lastpass with Yubikey, a strong combination !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Lastpass with Yubikey, a strong combination !</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/chR2LtpI1Vw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/which-password-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-11393</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/0ZQVqf7BGx0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11347</guid>
		<description>By removing the web browser they have crippled the Nook Simple Touch if you want to connect to guest wireless services at a lot of airports, hotels and some restaurants, etc.  Some of these places require you to log in with a password thru a browser before you could use the wireless service and you could do that with the NST browser.   Then you could go on to down load books, newspapers, or magazines from the Barnes and Noble store.  Well, not any more!  I'm going to BN this weekend to see if I can get a refund since they sold it to me with this functionality and suddenly, for no reason removed it.   Nook Simple Touch almost useless for travelers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By removing the web browser they have crippled the Nook Simple Touch if you want to connect to guest wireless services at a lot of airports, hotels and some restaurants, etc.  Some of these places require you to log in with a password thru a browser before you could use the wireless service and you could do that with the NST browser.   Then you could go on to down load books, newspapers, or magazines from the Barnes and Noble store.  Well, not any more!  I&#8217;m going to BN this weekend to see if I can get a refund since they sold it to me with this functionality and suddenly, for no reason removed it.   Nook Simple Touch almost useless for travelers.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/0ZQVqf7BGx0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11347</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/CRkox9qjvAw/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11304</guid>
		<description>Andrew: Opera is the best supported browser for older systems. IE 6 is very insecure and will not work on many sites. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew: Opera is the best supported browser for older systems. IE 6 is very insecure and will not work on many sites.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/CRkox9qjvAw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11304</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Browsers 2011: Which Is the Best Browser for You? by Andrew petronio</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/WgQQd_xORpo/</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew petronio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1968#comment-11302</guid>
		<description>Hi i am running windows 2000 with internet explorer 6. What browser do you recommend for an upgrade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi i am running windows 2000 with internet explorer 6. What browser do you recommend for an upgrade</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/WgQQd_xORpo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/03/15/best-browsers-2011-best-browser-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11302</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/Ks43xZ7dNMg/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11288</guid>
		<description>Reuben - I still think it can't hurt to ask the professor about scanning. Most modern scanning devices include OCR software and the ability to save a scanned image to a PDF with reflowable text. It results in larger files but it is far more useful for both E-book reading and for searching within the text. It seems possible that your professor already has access to saving text as reflowable PDFs but doesn't do it in order to keep file sizes smaller.

Nearly 2 years ago I bought my wife a Lexmark Prestige Pro 805 (since replaced by the Pinnacle Pro 905). It is pretty easy to produce reflowable PDF scans with this $200 model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reuben &#8211; I still think it can&#8217;t hurt to ask the professor about scanning. Most modern scanning devices include OCR software and the ability to save a scanned image to a PDF with reflowable text. It results in larger files but it is far more useful for both E-book reading and for searching within the text. It seems possible that your professor already has access to saving text as reflowable PDFs but doesn&#8217;t do it in order to keep file sizes smaller.</p>
<p>Nearly 2 years ago I bought my wife a Lexmark Prestige Pro 805 (since replaced by the Pinnacle Pro 905). It is pretty easy to produce reflowable PDF scans with this $200 model.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/Ks43xZ7dNMg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11288</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by reuben</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/7QOS87rnuGU/</link>
		<dc:creator>reuben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11287</guid>
		<description>Just a little background. In the past, if a professor wanted to assign a reading outside of the textbook, they would xerox it and hand it out. Now the school is going is going green, so instead, professors scan the document into an image. There never was any reflow-able text. I doubt my teachers would even know what reflowable text is, so asking them would be a waste of time. The nook tries to scale these to the size of the screen creating very small text. These files display fine on my netbook, but trying to use my netbook during the morning commute with the sun blaring through the window of the train is a trying experience. Plus my netbook has a very limited battery. This also applies to books from google or the internet archive, which are just scanned pages. Some of the books on google have DRM which will not work with the kindle anyways, soo.

As for managing ebooks on the nook, I simply use calibre. Most of the time I'm just grabbing books from project gutenberg. I'm not sure about syncing highlights, bookmarks, etc, because I only use one ebook reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little background. In the past, if a professor wanted to assign a reading outside of the textbook, they would xerox it and hand it out. Now the school is going is going green, so instead, professors scan the document into an image. There never was any reflow-able text. I doubt my teachers would even know what reflowable text is, so asking them would be a waste of time. The nook tries to scale these to the size of the screen creating very small text. These files display fine on my netbook, but trying to use my netbook during the morning commute with the sun blaring through the window of the train is a trying experience. Plus my netbook has a very limited battery. This also applies to books from google or the internet archive, which are just scanned pages. Some of the books on google have DRM which will not work with the kindle anyways, soo.</p>
<p>As for managing ebooks on the nook, I simply use calibre. Most of the time I&#8217;m just grabbing books from project gutenberg. I&#8217;m not sure about syncing highlights, bookmarks, etc, because I only use one ebook reader.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/7QOS87rnuGU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11287</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/VYvOZjQXWN4/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11278</guid>
		<description>I hear you, Otavio. As I test the new Kindle Touch, I find myself wishing for the best of both the Nook and the Kindle. The Nook Simple Touch has hardware and a user interface that is better designed for a touchscreen. But the Kindle platform has a long list of advantages. Seamless sync is one of the biggest advantages.

For my personal usage, the single biggest advantages of Kindle E Ink devices is the ease of getting content onto the device. Can't get content onto Nook Simple Touch with the simple click of a button on my computer. But getting content onto a Kindle is super easy with Instapaper, Readability, or e-mailing a personal document to your Kindle e-mail address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you, Otavio. As I test the new Kindle Touch, I find myself wishing for the best of both the Nook and the Kindle. The Nook Simple Touch has hardware and a user interface that is better designed for a touchscreen. But the Kindle platform has a long list of advantages. Seamless sync is one of the biggest advantages.</p>
<p>For my personal usage, the single biggest advantages of Kindle E Ink devices is the ease of getting content onto the device. Can&#8217;t get content onto Nook Simple Touch with the simple click of a button on my computer. But getting content onto a Kindle is super easy with Instapaper, Readability, or e-mailing a personal document to your Kindle e-mail address.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/VYvOZjQXWN4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11278</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Monitor Setup to Reduce Eye Fatigue and Distraction by Joe Golton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/zxOftoHrzL8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Golton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1896#comment-11277</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

I've never used a display higher than 1920 x 1200 so I can only speculate. But let me state the obvious first: how about wearing corrective lenses, either glasses or contacts? I've been near sighted since the age of 10 so I've worn glasses at nearly all times except when sleeping or in water. I'm currently on the edge of needing bifocals (or better yet progressive lenses) but just haven't got around to doing it yet - so keeping the monitor far away is actually easier for me as I don't have to switch from my regular glasses to my one-foot-away glasses (I don't need glasses at less than 9 inches away, so I take my regular glasses off sometimes when using my new iPhone 4s).

Back to your original question - my experience with monitors of the 1920 x 1200 or smaller size on Windows XP and Windows 7 is that you get far better text and graphics clarity running the monitor at the native resolution. I'm assuming you'll get the same results on a larger monitor. If you're going to keep the monitor close to your eyes, then go for the smallest monitor you can find with 2560 x 1440 resolution.

Also, you could run a 2 monitor setup. One with the large monitor for testing and design connected with your work. The other monitor could be like I'm suggesting in this post---to be used for your on-line reading. I would imagine that even if you design all day for a living, you still have to do quite a bit of reading. The solution I suggest in this article is aimed at reading content. For other types of work such as design or finance (big spreadsheets), the faraway vertical monitor setup will not be appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never used a display higher than 1920 x 1200 so I can only speculate. But let me state the obvious first: how about wearing corrective lenses, either glasses or contacts? I&#8217;ve been near sighted since the age of 10 so I&#8217;ve worn glasses at nearly all times except when sleeping or in water. I&#8217;m currently on the edge of needing bifocals (or better yet progressive lenses) but just haven&#8217;t got around to doing it yet &#8211; so keeping the monitor far away is actually easier for me as I don&#8217;t have to switch from my regular glasses to my one-foot-away glasses (I don&#8217;t need glasses at less than 9 inches away, so I take my regular glasses off sometimes when using my new iPhone 4s).</p>
<p>Back to your original question &#8211; my experience with monitors of the 1920 x 1200 or smaller size on Windows XP and Windows 7 is that you get far better text and graphics clarity running the monitor at the native resolution. I&#8217;m assuming you&#8217;ll get the same results on a larger monitor. If you&#8217;re going to keep the monitor close to your eyes, then go for the smallest monitor you can find with 2560 x 1440 resolution.</p>
<p>Also, you could run a 2 monitor setup. One with the large monitor for testing and design connected with your work. The other monitor could be like I&#8217;m suggesting in this post&#8212;to be used for your on-line reading. I would imagine that even if you design all day for a living, you still have to do quite a bit of reading. The solution I suggest in this article is aimed at reading content. For other types of work such as design or finance (big spreadsheets), the faraway vertical monitor setup will not be appropriate.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/zxOftoHrzL8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/26/the-best-monitor-setup-to-reduce-eye-fatigue-and-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-11277</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nook Simple Touch Firmware Update 1.1.0 by Otavio</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/xJmpkep6RC0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Otavio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=2390#comment-11276</guid>
		<description>Hey there Joe.
I'm amazed by the fact that B&amp;N, despite the fact that it was not as limiting in terms of content for the Nook, has not as yet released anything that allows for content syncinc, meaning one cannot get bookmarks or last page read (or anything of the sort) synced between B&amp;N software.

That really saddens me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there Joe.<br />
I&#8217;m amazed by the fact that B&#038;N, despite the fact that it was not as limiting in terms of content for the Nook, has not as yet released anything that allows for content syncinc, meaning one cannot get bookmarks or last page read (or anything of the sort) synced between B&#038;N software.</p>
<p>That really saddens me.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/xJmpkep6RC0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/11/08/nook-simpletouch-firmware-update-1-10/comment-page-1/#comment-11276</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Monitor Setup to Reduce Eye Fatigue and Distraction by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~3/fdBKsHDyCHA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filterjoe.com/?p=1896#comment-11274</guid>
		<description>What do you think of buying a high-density display like Samsung and Dell 27" 2560 X 1440 monitors and then setting the resolution in OS to a smaller one? If you keep it proportional 1280x720, there should be no distortion... 1280x720 is not fantastic, but magnifying everything through browser or Windows is not very acceptable in my line of work (we can call it web-sites design for the sake of a simple metaphor), as it makes the user interface look not as designed. It might be a stupid idea, and these monitors are not sold at local stores and are pretty costly to try via buying for the sake of trying... I wish local Costco stocked them:-)

I'm shortsighted, so I can't keep the monitor far away - I don't see much then. At the same time I don't want to keep the monitor too close to the eyes, as I think it may make the shortsightedness even worse (not immediately, but when we speak about 60-80hrs a week for years, it does accumulate...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of buying a high-density display like Samsung and Dell 27&#8243; 2560 X 1440 monitors and then setting the resolution in OS to a smaller one? If you keep it proportional 1280&#215;720, there should be no distortion&#8230; 1280&#215;720 is not fantastic, but magnifying everything through browser or Windows is not very acceptable in my line of work (we can call it web-sites design for the sake of a simple metaphor), as it makes the user interface look not as designed. It might be a stupid idea, and these monitors are not sold at local stores and are pretty costly to try via buying for the sake of trying&#8230; I wish local Costco stocked them:-)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m shortsighted, so I can&#8217;t keep the monitor far away &#8211; I don&#8217;t see much then. At the same time I don&#8217;t want to keep the monitor too close to the eyes, as I think it may make the shortsightedness even worse (not immediately, but when we speak about 60-80hrs a week for years, it does accumulate&#8230;)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Filterjoecomments/~4/fdBKsHDyCHA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.filterjoe.com/2011/02/26/the-best-monitor-setup-to-reduce-eye-fatigue-and-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-11274</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

