Firewalls.com Learning Community

SonicWall TZ680 vs TZ580: A Seamless Transition in Upgraded Specs

Lucas Modrall — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 12:00:59 +0000

The TZ series of firewalls from SonicWall are popular for many reasons. From the promise of enterprise-grade protection to simplified scalability, there’s a lot to appreciate here. However, focusing on the firewall comparison of SonicWall TZ 680 vs TZ 580, it’s understandable to have a few questions about what makes them so different.

While they’re both from the Gen 8 lineup, the specifications show exactly what makes them unique from one another. This article focuses on a next generation firewall comparison that’ll help guide you to the right piece of hardware for your network security.

Key Takeaways:

The TZ 680 offers faster throughput and app inspection than the TZ 580
TZ 680 is more ideal for growing mid-sized businesses, and the TZ 580 suits smaller networks
Both models support features like SD-WAN, TLS 1.3, zero-touch deployment, and high-speed VPN
TZ 680 handles more connections per second and higher SPI connections
Both provide next-gen firewall protection with intrusion prevention, anti-malware, and VPN support

An Overview of SonicWall Gen 8 Firewalls

Combining the benefits of firewalls, switches, and wireless capability, Gen 8 models have made network management easier than ever. This also comes with the promise of high port density, zero-touch deployment, and a modernized UX/UI.

In addition to that, you’re getting integrated SD-WAN, TLS 1.3 support, high-speed VPN, and the list goes on. Nevertheless, aside from the similarities, there are a handful of specific differences that can be found when comparing SonicWall TZ 680 vs TZ 580.

What is the SonicWall TZ 680?

A leading solution from SonicWall’s Gen 8 platform, the TZ 680 comes with some pretty comprehensive defenses. From real-time visibility, zero-touch deployment, cost efficiency, and more, there’s a lot to look forward to. However, the specifications are some of the main focal points when it comes to a firewall comparison.

Check out some of the leading specs in the list below:

Firewall Throughput: 5 Gbps
Threat Prevention Throughput: 2.5 Gbps
App Inspection Throughput: 3 Gbps
IPS Throughput: 3 Gbps
Connections per Second: 26,000

Considering how fresh this model is to the TZ series, you can also lean on its years of ongoing support as your next firewall. As always though, it’s vital to hone in on the right set of specifications for the needs of your business network. That’s where comparison can help, and it doesn’t hurt to think about what the TZ 580 is capable of as well.

What is the SonicWall TZ 580?

It’s safe to assume that these two models share a few similarities, since they both come with SonicOS 8 tech. Outside of that, the specs do vary here and there, which will always be some of your leading key decision-making factors.

Here’s a quick look at what the TZ 580 is bringing to the table:

Firewall Throughput: 4.5 Gbps
Threat Prevention Throughput: 2.2 Gbps
App Inspection Throughput: 2.5 Gbps
IPS Throughput: 2.5 Gbps
Connections per Second: 20,000

This is just the start of what the TZ 580 is capable of. Outside of the impressive features and capabilities, you need to size these specs up against the needs of your network. Overall, the TZ 580 is a great option for growing businesses that need some room for scalability to the next model.

SonicWall TZ Comparison Chart

If you really want to get a good look at comparing SonicWall TZ 680 vs TZ 580, it’s the numbers that matter most. This is especially true since both of these models share many of the same features found in all SonicWall Gen 8 firewalls. In the table below, you’ll find a more thorough breakdown of comparable specs that’ll help support your final decision.

Specifications	TZ 680	TZ 580
Firewall Throughput	5 Gbps	4.5 Gbps
Threat Prevention Throughput	2.5 Gbps	2.2 Gbps
App Inspection Throughput	3 Gbps	2.5 Gbps
IPS Throughput	3 Gbps	2.5 Gbps
Anti-Malware Inspection Throughput	2.5 Gbps	2.2 Gbps
IPSEC VPN Throughput	2.5 Gbps	2.2 Gbps
Connections per Second	26,000	20,000
Max Connections (SPI)	1,600,000	1,400,000
Site-to-Site VPN Tunnels	250	250
Storage	Up to 512 GB	Up to 512 GB
Interfaces	8 x 1GbE Cu 2 x 10G SFP 1 console (Micro-USB) 1 USB (type-C)	8 x 1GbE Cu 2 x 5G/2.5G/1G SFP+ 1 console (Micro-USB) 1 USB (type-C)

As you can see, they cut pretty close to each other across numerous categories. On the other hand, the smallest variations in these specs can mean a big difference for your network security and performance.

The Bottom Line

In this comparison of SonicWall TZ 680 vs TZ 580, it’s clear that both models offer the next-gen security your business needs. However, the 580 is geared more toward small business networks, while the 680 is optimized for growing mid-sized organizations.

Remember, it’s not about what they share, but where the differences are, and how this correlates to the needs of your long-term security strategy. Nevertheless, Firewalls.com is here when you need us for expert guidance on which of these models is best for your particular network.

FAQ

What are the Main Differences Between SonicWall TZ 680 and TZ 580?

Managed Versus Unmanaged Network Switch: What’s the Difference?

Lucas Modrall — Thu, 04 Jun 2026 12:00:43 +0000

Making the choice between a managed versus unmanaged network switch comes with several considerations. However, differences aside, both switch types can connect devices like computers, printers, and access points all within a local network.

With unmanaged switches, you’re working with a simple setup device that doesn’t require configuration. On the other hand, managed switches provide advanced control over traffic, security settings, and network monitoring. This article focuses on the core differences between managed and unmanaged network switches so you can determine which is best for your operation.

Key Takeaways:

Both managed and unmanaged switches connect devices within a local network, but differ in control and functionality
Unmanaged switches are simple, plug-and-play devices requiring no setup for configuration
Managed switches promise advanced features like traffic control, monitoring, and security customization
Network complexity and scalability needs are key factors in choosing the right switch type
The best option depends on balancing ease of use, performance demands, and long-term network scalability

How Network Switch Types Affect Performance and Control

Network switches play a vital role in directing data flow between connected devices. This is pretty important when it comes to local network infrastructure. In addition to that, the type of switch you use can influence how efficiently bandwidth is allocated across your network.

Moreover, some environments benefit more from centralized control features, like fine-tuning network behavior. Then again, there’s nothing wrong with a plug-and-play approach if it suits the needs of your network and business operations. This is why technical comparisons are important, so you can understand network switch managed vs unmanaged to guide your decision-making.

What is a Managed Network Switch?

A managed network switch offers advanced control over how data is handled within a network. This means admins can configure and customize network traffic behavior.

Here are a few key factors to keep in mind about managed switches:

These devices handle traffic prioritization for improved performance efficiency
Managed switches deliver real-time visibility into connected devices and data flow
Admins can monitor network activity to identify potential issues early on
Configuration options can range from VLAN setup to port-level adjustments
Managed switches are great for scaling networks and operational reliability

Although this all sounds good as is, that doesn’t mean unmnaaged switches aren’t a viable option as well. It always comes down to the unique needs of your network and business operations as a whole. Nevertheless, it’s important to understand the differences in managed versus unmanaged network switch solutions.

What is an Unmanaged Network Switch

An unmanaged network switch is built for simpler, plug-and-play network connectivity. What many small companies like about this is that it requires no configuration or setup before use.

These are a few core differences that you’ll find with unmanaged switches:

These devices automatically forward data between connected devices
Unmanaged switches don’t include monitoring or traffic management tools
They’re commonly used in small offices and home networks
Operating using fixed settings, they can’t be modified by the user
Unmanaged network switches are easy to use and tend to be very cost-efficient

Overall, an unmanaged switch is best suited for environments that have basic and predictable networking demands. At the end of the day, you’ll always have numerous options to choose from. It always comes down to which set of features and capabilities your network actually needs.

Comparing Managed Versus Unmanaged Network Switch Capabilities

It never hurts to get a streamlined understanding of the technical stuff, especially when it comes to network hardware. The table below offers a side-by-side comparison of what you can expect from managed and unmanaged switches.

Cateogry	Managed Network Switch	Unmanaged Network Switch
Configuration Control	Fully configurable with advanced settings and customization options	No configuration required and operates with default settings
Network Visibility	Provides real-time monitoring and detailed traffic insights	No monitoring or visibility tools available
Traffic Management	Supports prioritization, segmentation, and optimization of data flow	Automatically forwards traffic without control or optimization features
Security Features	Allows implementation of access controls and security policies	No built-in security configuration options
Best Use Case	Suitable for complex, scalable, and performance-driven networks	Ideal for simple, small-scale, plug-and-play network demands

Remember, in this context, your focus shouldn’t be on which type is better, but which is more aligned with your actual network needs. Network switches are an important piece of hardware for businesses, but it’s important you end up with the best choice for your operation.

Final Thoughts

If you have a good idea of your needs in network control and visibility, then you’ll have a better chance of making the right choice here. Reviewing managed versus unmanaged network switch solutions is a crucial part of your long-term network strategy.

Aside from the hardware, you also don’t have to handle the decision-making all on your own. Check in with us at Firewalls.com for a long list of network switch solutions, in addition to the managed support we offer for the long run.

FAQ

What is the Primary Difference In Managed and Unmanaged Network Switch Hardware?

SSL VPN Appliance Solutions are Aging: How Zero Trust (ZTNA) is Taking Over

Lucas Modrall — Wed, 03 Jun 2026 12:00:10 +0000

An SSL VPN appliance is primarily based on an outdated security model. More specifically, a security model that’s designed for the likes of perimeter-based networks. Nowadays, these systems are increasingly seen as security liabilities in hybrid and cloud environments.

The reality is that traditional protections like MFA aren’t enough to keep your network and endpoints protected. Many leaders in this industry are shifting away from network-level access and looking more into app-level security models. This article focuses on how Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) replaces implicit trust with continuous verification of identity, device health, and context.

Key Takeaways:

SSL VPN appliances are becoming security liabilities due to their outdated architecture
Modern attacks exploit VPN gateways directly, making them high-value targets on the network edge
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) replaces implicit trust with continuous verification
Major firewall vendors are actively deprecating or redesigning SSL VPN in favor of Zero Trust models
The industry is shifting from network-level access to secure, app-specific access controls

Why SSL VPNs are Becoming a Security Debt

SSL VPNs were originally built to extend secure remote access. However, in today’s world, they end up functioning as exposed internet-facing entry points.

Over time, SSL VPNs have shifted from secure gateways to high-value targets for cyber attacks. It’s important to keep in mind that their placement on the network edge makes them highly visible, which means continuous exploitation.

The main issue here is architectural, as SSL VPNs expose privileged services directly to the internet. For businesses, this accumulated risk ends up being a security debt that is now reaching a breaking point for many networks. Thankfully, leading enterprise Zero Trust microsegmentation providers have brought multiple solutions to the market.

How Leading Vendors in Zero Trust Real-Time Monitoring are Replacing SSL VPN

Many firewall vendors are moving away from SSL VPN and are starting to prioritize Zero Trust principles. In addition to that, remote access is moving from network-level connectivity to identity and context-based access control.

Although the likes of SonicWall SSL VPN licenses and solutions from other leading security providers are still around, many are replacing VPN features. This can be seen through product redesigns, deprecation, and cloud-first platforms.

Considering the big picture here, SSL VPN is being steadily phased out in favor of continuous verification and Zero Trust architectures. You can see what this looks like between popular security providers in the table below.

Vendor	Transition Approach	Key Tech	Access Model	Key Strength
Fortinet	Universal ZTNA model built on existing firewall infrastructure	FortiGate, FortiClient, IPsec fallback	Moves from SSL VPN to ZTNA with optional IPsec fallback for legacy support	Cost-effective transition for organizations already using Fortinet ecosystems
Cisco Meraki	Cloud-first consolidation of remote access services	Cisco Secure Access, browser-based clientless ZTNA	Dynamic access decisions between full tunnel and app-level access	Frictionless, identity-driven access for hybrid and BYOD networks
SonicWall	Security-driven replacement accelerated by major attacks and platform evolution	Cloud Secure Edge, trust scoring, endpoint posture validation	Shifts from traditional SSL VPN to granular app-based access	Response to real-world exploitation and forced modernization of legacy VPN systems
Sophos	Phased deprecation of SSL VPN in favor of Zero Trust gateways	Sophos Connect, ZTNA gateways, Synchornized Security Heartbeat	Moves from network-wide VPN tunnels to real-time, session-aware access control	Instant threat response via endpoint compromise detection and session termination
WatchGuard	VPN limitations exposed through vulnerability-driven repositioning	FireCloud Total Access, AuthPoint MFA, EPDR, ZTNA stack	Replaces broad VPN tunnels with session-based, app-specific access	Focus on reducing overly permissive network access (WatchGuard SSL VPN)

Regardless of which provider you’re looking into, SSL VPN is being treated as a legacy tech, rather than a core security feature. Instead of searching for the best VPN for remote employees, it’s time to start understanding the long-term benefits of ZTNA. However, you don’t have to handle this transition all by yourself, as managed services can make sure you’re on the leading edge of this shift.

Final Thoughts

The core of an SSL VPN appliance was designed for legacy perimeter-based network environments. However, these are no longer an accurate reflection of modern infrastructure. Today’s hybrid, cloud-driven environments make traditional network access models risky and outdated.

To keep your business on the safe side of this, it’s advantageous to work with security vendors that are delivering accessible ZTNA solutions. You can learn more about the aging nature of SSL VPNs in our YouTube video on the topic down below. If you’d like to get in touch with our team at Firewalls.com, we’re here with the answers and security solutions your business could benefit from.

FAQ

Why are SSL VPN Appliances Considered Outdated?

Sophos XDR vs EDR: Exploring Differing Solutions in Endpoint Protection

Lucas Modrall — Tue, 02 Jun 2026 12:00:50 +0000

Solutions focused on endpoint security matter more than a lot of businesses tend to consider. While you have plenty of options to choose from in this category, it doesn’t hurt to narrow down your options to make the decision-making a little easier. More specifically, comparing Sophos XDR vs EDR to understand the differences can offer quite a bit of help.

Sure, XDR and EDR overlap in several ways, but there are core differences to pay attention to here. This article focuses on comparing the two, highlighting differences in visibility, automation support, and threat response.

Key Takeaways:

EDR focuses on detecting and responding to threats at the individual endpoint level
XDR expands visibility across endpoints, cloud, email, servers, and network traffic
XDR improves threat detection by correlating data across multiple security layers
EDR provides deep, device-level investigation using guided analysis tools
Sophos allows organizations to use both XDR and EDR together for stronger unified protection

The Importance of Endpoint Protection Solutions

Endpoint devices have become a main entry point for modern cyber threats. This is especially true for the business world, as there are more endpoints than ever that you’ll need to keep protected. The tools have a focus on proactive threat detection, rather than only reacting after an attack has already taken place.

With this particular approach, you can stop threats before they escalate across your network. Modern solutions like this analyze behavior and content to identify suspicious activity in real time. For those interested in Sophos business solutions, understanding what makes XDR and EDR unique is a must.

What is Sophos XDR?

For starters, Sophos XDR focuses on unifying security visibility across your entire IT environment. The service collects and correlates data from endpoints, cloud workloads, servers, email, as well as network traffic.

Here’s a quick gist of what you can expect from Sophos XDR solutions:

Builds on endpoint security foundations like Sophos Central InterceptX
Enhances detection by utilizing centralized threat intelligence and machine learning
Reduces alert noise by prioritizing more relevant and actionable network incidents
Automatically correlates security events into a single, unified view

From a bird’s-eye view, Sophos XDR enables faster investigations, improved response times, and better scalability for complex networks. Although they might sound similar, EDR comes with its own characteristics among other endpoint security tools.

What is Sophos EDR?

When it comes to Sophos for small business solutions, EDR is a part of this discussion as well. However, with EDR, the main focus here is on monitoring activity directly on endpoint devices.

Check out how EDR differs from XDR in the brief list below:

Helps detect suspicious behavior that might indicate a cyber threat
Provides detailed visibility into what happens on laptops, desktops, and servers
The goal isn’t just prevention, but investigation and response after activity occurs
Machine learning and threat intelligence help improve detection accuracy
EDR organizes endpoint data into guided investigations to support faster incident response

The best part about this is that EDR capabilities are included in many Sophos Central solutions. Instead of having to choose one over the other, you get the best of both worlds in one.

Comparing Sophos XDR vs EDR

Looking into the comparisons of Sophos XDR vs EDR is still an essential component to your decision-making. Even though implementation is relatively easy, you still need to know what you’re working with when it comes to both sides of the coin here. In the table below, you’ll find several clear-cut comparisons of the differences, as well as the similarities.

Category	Sophos XDR	Sophos EDR
Scope of Visibility	Extends across endpoints, email, cloud, servers, and network data	Focuses on endpoints such as laptops, servers, and workstations
Primary Function	Correlates and analyzes threats across the entire environment	Detects and responds to threats on individual devices
Data Analysis Approach	Cross-platform data correlation for broader threat context	Endpoint-level telemetry and behavior analysis
Investigation Style	Unified investigations across multiple security layers	Manual, guided investigations on endpoint activity
Best Use Case	Organizations needing full-spectrum threat detection and faster, correlated response	Teams focused on endpoint-level threat detection and response

Considering you can get XDR and EDR together, there’s no reason to worry about which one you should choose. Both options are relevant for any modern network security, and Sophos makes it easier than ever to integrate.

In the same vein, managed security services can take the entire weight of this decision off your shoulders. Services like this are how you stay protected with the endpoint solutions you need and keep a proactive stance when you need to make a change.

The Bottom Line

Within the topic of Sophos XDR vs EDR, it isn’t a matter of choosing one over the other, but understanding their unique capabilities. EDR focuses on deep visibility and response at the individual endpoint level. With XDR, you’re getting expanded visibility across endpoints, email, cloud, and more.

Working with us at Firewalls.com not only gives you the endpoint security you need, but the backend, hands-on expertise to know which route to take for your business. Consider hopping on a call with us to learn how these Sophos endpoint solutions can support your business network security strategy.

FAQ

How do Sophos XDR and EDR Differ in Threat Detection?

Fortinet vs WatchGuard: Comparing the FG-60F and T185 Firewall Solutions

Lucas Modrall — Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:00:40 +0000

For those going down the path of choosing the right firewall, it can seem like you have a never-ending list to choose from. Moreover, it can be hard to know which models to compare if you don’t know what you’re looking for. In the context of Fortinet vs WatchGuard firewalls, both manufacturers have many excellent options to choose from.

More specifically, FG60F vs T185 focuses on comparing small business firewall solutions, each with their own design priorities. This article compares the two firewalls to help guide you on which direction would be best for your business network security.

Key Takeaways:

The FG-60F and T185 are both designed for small business and branch office firewall deployments
Fortinet is known for high performance, centralized management, and integrated security services
WatchGuard T185 leans into modular hardware, scalability, and flexible network expansion options
FG-60F generally delivers stronger throughput for more performance-driven environments
The best choice depends on whether a business values performance efficiency or long-term infrastructure flexibility

A Firewall Comparison at a Glance

With the Fortinet FG-60F, you’re getting network support that’s suitable for small offices and branch environments. This means a user capacity of 25 to 50 and plenty of high-performance throughput.

On the other hand, the WatchGuard firewall T185 is highly configurable, built with flexibility in mind. The short version is that Fortinet focuses on performance and integrated security, while WatchGuard excels with modular scalability and hardware flexibility.

What is the Fortinet FG-60F?

A next-generation firewall built for the likes of small businesses, this particular model comes with the promise of 10 Gbps firewall throughput. It’s also supported by Fortinet’s FortiOS, which enables centralized and simplified network security management.

Here’s a quick look at the specs:

Firewall Throughput: Up to 10 Gbps
IPsec VPN Throughput: 6.5 Gbps
SSL-VPN Throughput: 900 Mbps
App Control Throughput: 1.8 Gbps
Concurrent Sessions: 700,000

Of course, the firewall offers a lot more than this alone, but it’s definitely a good starting point for comparing metrics. Always remember that your decision between the two should be based on what aligns best with your business. Both of these firewalls are stellar options, but you have to dive into the features and capabilities to know which is right for you.

What is the WatchGuard Technologies Firewall T185?

The T185 from WatchGuard is a desktop firewall that’s also great for small business network security. It’s hailed for its highly configurable design, making it an adaptable design for those who prioritize flexibility.

Check out the specifications below for a quick comparison:

Firewall Throughput: 7.9 Gbps
VPN Throughput: 2.2 Gbps
UTM Throughput: 1.83 Gbps
IPS Throughput: 2.4 Gbps
Concurrent Connections: 3,850,000

It’s also worth noting that the T185 comes with SFP+ fiber connectivity, in addition to multiple Ethernet interfaces. It also delivers enhanced BOVPN performance, which works to improve secure site-to-site connections.

FortiGate FG-60F vs WatchGuard Firewall T185 Firewall Comparison

Without a streamlined understanding of what these firewalls are capable of, you’re going to have a hard time making a choice. The table below offers the overview you need to compare these firewalls side by side across several crucial categories.

Specification	Fortinet FortiGate 60F	WatchGuard Firebox T185
Target Use Case	Small businesses and branch offices	Branch offices, retail, and high-demand sites
IPS / Threat Protection	IPS: 1.4 Gbps / Threat Protection: 700 Mbps	IPS: 2.4 Gbps / UTM: 1.83 Gbps
Firewall Throughput	Up to 10 Gbps	Up to 7.9 Gbps
SSL / HTTPS Inspection	SSL Inspection: 630 Mbps	HTTPS: 1 Gbps
VPN Performance	IPsec VPN: up to 6.5 Gbps	VPN: Up to 1.14 Gbps
Interfaces	2 x GE RJ45 WAN 1 x DMZ Ports 5 x GE RJ45 Internal Ports 2 x GE RJ45 FortiLink Ports 1 x USB Ports 1 x Console (RJ45)	4 x 1 GbE 4 x 2.5 GbE 1 x SFP/SFP+
Advanced Features	FortiOS, FortiGuard AI security, SD-WAN included	TLS decryption, proxy firewall, WatchGuard Cloud reporting

It can be a lot to take in, but at the end of the day, both firewalls are excellent security solutions for small and growing businesses. In the same vein, you don’t have to handle all of the decision-making by yourself. Working with managed services from security providers can make sure you end up with the right hardware, long-term maintenance, and expertise you need.

The Bottom Line

Regardless of which side you lean towards with Fortinet vs WatchGuard, your business network will be in good hands. Where FortiGate emphasizes performance and unified security architecture, WatchGuard offers expandable ports, fiber connectivity, and seamless scalability.

In the same vein, many of the benefits of the two overlap. Both firewalls are excellent small business firewall solutions, but your choice depends on long-term network demands and your growth strategy. We’re here if you need us, so reach out to learn more about both of these firewall options and how they fit into your business network.

FAQ

What is the Core Difference Between Fortinet FG-60F and WatchGuard T185?

Best Secure Remote Access for OT Networks: The 4 Most Reliable Choices

Lucas Modrall — Thu, 28 May 2026 12:00:36 +0000

OT networks, a core part of manufacturing, transportation, and many other industries, need highly secure remote access (SRA) solutions. Sure, this is only one piece to the security puzzle, but finding the best secure remote access for OT networks is crucial.

The scope of OT environments differs from IT in several ways, such as the needs behind highly reliable connections, low latency, and strict uptime guarantees. This article focuses on four of the most reliable choices that OT networks can rely on for secure remote access at all times.

Key Takeaways:

OT networks require highly secure remote access to maintain uptime, safety, and operational reliability
Leading vendors include SonicWall, Sophos, Cisco Meraki, and WatchGuard, each with distinct strengths
SonicWall focuses on policy-driven access control and scalable licensing for distributed environments
Sophos and Meraki carry strengths in centralized management, with cloud visibility and ecosystem integration
Strong SRA solutions improve security, reduce downtime risk, and support efficient remote operations in OT environments

4 Best Secure Remote Access for OT Networks Solutions

To get a good start on this topic, it helps to lean into some of the most reliable manufacturers in the industry. In this case, you’re getting a closer look at four leading secure remote control solutions from SonicWall, Sophos, Cisco Meraki, and WatchGuard.

While these aren’t the only options on the market, their reputation and history in network security solutions offer the reliability your business network needs. Focusing on factors like security, scalability, and OT suitability helps to narrow down your options here.

1. SonicWall SRA

Carrying a focus on secure, policy-driven remote access, SonicWall SRA makes it easy for distributed users. It’s more than suited to support OT environments, especially where uptime, reliability, and strict access control are a must.

This is one of the best-rated secure remote access for OT solutions, as you get licensing models that support scalability, stackable users, and even virtual appliance options. Other notable capabilities include angles like single sign-on and device visibility to help improve control, security, and operational efficiency.

2. Sophos SRA

What’s great about Sophos SRA options is that they’re integrated into the broader scope of the Sophos Central security ecosystem. Going this route means you get a combination of endpoint protection, identity security, as well as threat prevention.

Moreover, there are built-in features to take advantage of, including web filtering, authentication tools, and password protection. Sophos Central gives you the centralized management you need for deploying and enforcing remote access policies.

3. Cisco Meraki SRA

Another option, seen as some of the best secure remote access software for OT networks, is Cisco Meraki. This is a cloud-managed SRA solution, making it a great choice for those prioritizing centralized control.

In addition to that, you can utilize integrated firewalling and encrypted VPN connectivity, and the cellular failover shouldn’t be overlooked either. The overall cloud visibility of this gives IT teams what they need to monitor devices, enforce policies, and manage access in real time.

4. WatchGuard SRA

With WatchGuard’s remote access solutions for business, you’re getting a strong focus on fast, encrypted VPN connectivity. More specifically, the WatchGuard Panda VPN is created with small-scale deployments in mind.

However, you aren’t limited to this alone, as you still get the range of enterprise-grade remote access. This can be seen in benefits like seamless roaming, built-in 2FA, and flexible licensing options for various organizational needs.

Why Secure Remote Access is Critical for OT Network Security and Reliability

At the end of the day, OT networks need more than simple secure connectivity for employees. It’s about maintaining secure distributed operations and field management from more than one angle.

Here are a few core reasons as to why SRA for OT networks is so vital:

Helps maintain teams, vendors, and engineers who need to troubleshoot remotely
Poorly secured remote access is a massive entry point for cyberattacks
OT environments require higher reliability than typical IT systems due to uptime and safety demands
Short disruptions in OT networks can lead to significant production downtime, financial loss, and even safety risks
SRA solutions enforce strict authentication and identity verification before granting system access
Network segmentation merged with remote access controls helps to limit lateral movement

If you’re working with OT networks, then SRA is a non-negotiable. In the same vein, it’s still important to know what you’re looking for based on your unique operational demands. Having the right remote access architecture in place does well to improve operational efficiency, as well as maintain compliance with industry regulations.

The Final Word

Always remember that searching for the best secure remote access for OT networks isn’t just about the needs of a remote workforce. It’s an essential for the overall safety, reliability, and continuous operations across all critical infrastructure.

If you’re looking for overall reliability, the likes of SonicWall, Sophos, Cisco Meraki, and WatchGuard are a good place to start. For those who’d like a little more guidance on the topic, set up a chat with our team at Firewalls.com for the direct answers and expertise you need. We’ll make sure you have the right SRA solution that comes with the promise of long-term and scalable support.

FAQ

What is Secure Remote Access (SRA) in OT Networks?

Sophos XGS Firewall Appliance 3100: Enterprise-Grade Performance with Room for Scalability

Lucas Modrall — Wed, 27 May 2026 12:00:49 +0000

Built with high-performance networks in mind, the Sophos XGS firewall 3100 promises support for modern encrypted traffic and advanced threats on multiple fronts. Many large businesses struggle to find scalable network security solutions that can blend in with their existing operations.

Not only that, but a firewall device that can cater to years of growth and a changing business environment. This article shines a light on the XGS 3100 and what makes it such a viable enterprise-grade firewall solution.

Key Takeaways:

The XGS 3100 is designed to support roughly 500 to 750 users
It utilizes Xstream architecture to balance traffic offloading and DPI for consistent performance
Delivers high throughput specs across firewall, IPS, VPN, and encrypted traffic workloads
Enables real-time visibility and protection with streaming DPI and TLS 1.3 inspection
Supports hybrid and remote environments, maintaining strong security enforcement and centralized control

What is the Sophos XGS Firewall 3100?

The Sophos XGS firewall 3100 is a next-gen firewall at its core, supporting advanced security functions like streaming DPI, TLS 1.3 inspection, AI-driven threat analysis, and more. It’s primarily designed for mid-sized enterprises that need some flexibility, as the Sophos firewall is able to support anywhere from 500 to 750 users.

Here’s a quick glance at what else you can expect from this next-gen firewall:

Leverages Xstream architecture to balance traffic acceleration and deep inspection
Delivers up to 38 Gbps firewall throughput
Uses traffic offloading to maintain performance during intensive inspection workloads
Optimized for hybrid and distributed networks that require consistent visibility and control

The list gets a lot longer from there. However, it’s important to dive into the performance architecture before you break down technical specifications. This is what helps to paint the full picture outside of specs alone.

Sophos XGS Firewalls Performance Architecture

With the benefit of Sophos Xstream protection, the 3100 is able to optimize how traffic is processed as well as prioritized. Moreover, it will offload aspects like trusted traffic, VPN flows, and cryptographic tasks to preserve inspection resources.

On the other hand, Xsteam protection works to allocate more processing power to high-risk and unknown traffic that requires deep packet inspection (DPI). Aside from the standalone benefits of XGS performance architecture, each next-gen layer complements the firewall as a whole.

Xstream Architecture and Traffic Offloading

Through the Xstream architecture, traffic is classified on angles like trust level, risk, and processing demands. This is all done before inspections begins.

In the full scope of Xstream, you get the assurance of consistent performance on top of reduced latency. This is also guaranteed even under a heavy network load. It’s just another component that highlights why this firewall device is built for the needs of growing enterprises.

Streaming DPI Engine

The XGS 3100 makes use of a Streaming DPI engine, which is crucial for real-time traffic inspection. It performs DPI as traffic flows, and this is done without waiting for full session reconstruction.

In addition to that, the firewall eliminates proxy-based inspection bottlenecks that are commonly found in traditional firewall architectures. The 3100 is able to maintain performance while running advanced security features, and scales efficiently at the same time. Overall, your network gets consistent throughput and user experience, even under heavy inspection.

High-Speed TLS 1.3 Inspection

Aside from secure, encrypted traffic, TLS 1.3 helps with decrypting encrypted sessions in real time for deep traffic analysis. Even more so, it works to detect threats that may be hidden inside encrypted application traffic.

It also helps to understand that TLS 1.3 inspection minimizes performance impact through the processes of optimized processing and hardware acceleration. In short, it’s a big part of ensuring you get full visibility without having to make any sacrifices in performance.

Key Specifications of the XGS 3100 Sophos Firewall

While 28 Gbps of firewall throughput is pretty impressive on its own, this is just the start of what the XGS 3100 is capable of. The premise of this firewall isn’t to just maintain performance but optimize for consistent security enforcement without the worry of network bottlenecks. The table below offers some direct insight into the key specifications of this firewall.

Specifications	Sophos XGS 3100
Firewall Throughput	47 Gbps
IPS Throughput	10.5 Gbps
Threat Protection Throughput	7.4 Gbps
NGFW Throughput	9 Gbps
IPsec VPN Throughput	25 Gbps
Concurrent Connections	12,260,000
New Connections per Second	186,500
Xstream SSL/TLS Inspection	2.47 Gbps
Storage	240 GB SATA-III SSD
Interfaces	8 x GE copper 2 x SFP 2 x SFP+ 10 GE 1 x RJ45 MGMT 1 x COM RJ45 1 x Micro-USB 2 x USB 3.0 1 x USB 2.0
Max Port Density	20
Max PoE Capacity	4 ports / 60W (via Flexi Port Module)

If it isn’t already clear, the XGS 3100 handles modern workloads from cloud apps, hybrid networks, and remote users without any issue. It can easily serve as a standalone core security control point for mid-sized organizations. Especially those needing a combination of scalable and resilient network protection.

Feature Highlights of the XGS 3100

Sophos Xstream protection and the specifications mentioned above aren’t all the XGS 3100 has to offer. Beyond perimeter defense, the firewall actively participates in threat containment, as well as remediation.

Here are several feature highlights you should know about:

Automatically isolates infected devices to limit the spread of threats
Blocks lateral movement across the internal network to contain breaches
Prevents outbound communication used for data exfiltration or command-and-control traffic
Easily integrates with Sophos Central MDR and XDR services for 24/7 monitoring and centralized incident response
Shares telemetry between endpoints and the firewall for unified visibility and enforcement

Here’s the thing, maximizing the value of Sophos XGS firewalls comes down to proper deployment, setup, and ongoing management. Advanced firewall capabilities are great, but they require continuous optimization to stay aligned with shifting network demands. That’s why many businesses opt for managed services, as it takes all of the stress and guesswork out of the equation.

When to Consider Managed Services for Your Sophos XGS Firewall

This may not be the case for all businesses, but many lack the ability to handle 24/7 monitoring and response internally. In reality, any modern security environment requires constant oversight that goes beyond standard business hours.

With the likes of managed firewall services, you can entirely outsource firewall operations and maintenance. This includes a range of support from continuous monitoring, expert management, policy tuning, hardware updates, and overall ongoing support.

You might think this is a small business solution, but it’s viable for businesses of any size looking to prioritize their time and money. Managing network security can take quite a bit of time and manpower, and managed services help to alleviate a lot of the challenges in this arena. That means you can operate day-to-day knowing your XGS 3100 is in good hands, continues to scale with you, and your business network can adapt when it needs to.

Let’s Wrap Up

The Sophos XGS firewall 3100 is the perfect solution for mid-sized and growing organizations. With the combination of high-throughput processing, Xstream architecture, feature-rich functionality, and impressive specs, it’s a reliable choice to say the least.

Not only does it deliver strong real-world performance, but it’s suitable for hybrid environments, as well as cloud spaces, remote users, and handling encrypted traffic. To hone in on whether or not this firewall is right for you, get in touch with our team at Firewalls.com for the support you need.

FAQ

What is the Sophos XGS Firewall 3100 Designed For?

Next Generation Firewall Appliance: An Overview of the SonicWall TZ380

Lucas Modrall — Tue, 26 May 2026 12:00:34 +0000

It’s no secret that modern business networks are facing an ever-growing list of complex cyber threats. Moreover, traditional security solutions don’t cut it anymore. This is why the rise of the next generation firewall appliance has become today’s norm.

From ransomware, creative phishing scams, and zero-day exploits, there’s a lot to monitor when it comes to maintaining your network security. This article shines a light on the SonicWall TZ380 and why it’s one of the best firewall solutions for small offices and remote workforces.

Key Takeaways:

Next generation firewall appliances provide layered security that traditional firewall solutions can’t offer
The SonicWall TZ380 delivers enterprise-grade security in a compact solution that’s perfect for small offices and branch locations
Advanced features like intrusion prevention, anti-malware, and Capture ATP help put a stop to modern cyber threats in real time
High throughput, multiple interfaces, and VPN support make the TZ380 suitable for hybrid and distributed networks
Regular firmware updates, monitoring, and oversight from professional services help maintain long-term firewall performance

Why Modern Businesses Need Advanced Firewall Hardware

It’s well known that next generation firewall appliances (NGFWs) excel when it comes to layering security solutions into a single platform. Moreover, aside from easy, centralized management, your business gets the benefit of a long list of proactive security measures.

For example, here’s a quick look at what that can look like:

Integration of intrusion prevention, deep packet inspection, app control, and advanced threat protection
App-level visibility for proactive threat mitigation
Reduced operational overhead by consolidating multiple security functions under one roof
Compact and high-performance firewall appliances that support long-term scalability

Of course, this is just the gist of it, and the benefits are bound to vary depending on which SonicWall firewall models you’re looking at. With the SonicWall TZ380, you’re getting the full spectrum of what SonicOS 8 has to offer.

Features of the SonicWall TZ380

Designed for the security needs of small offices and branch locations, this model from the SonicWall Gen 8 firewalls lineup doesn’t miss on the enterprise-grade security. A few of the surface-level benefits include intrusion prevention, anti-virus, anti-malware, and secure VPN access. It also features high port density, such as multiple 1 GbE and SFP+ interfaces, on top of expandable storage, redundant power, and cellular failover.

In addition to this, another benefit to opting for SonicWall firewall models is the easy integration with their switches, access points, and Capture Client for centralized endpoint security. Check out the table below for a more streamlined look at what the firewall brings to the table for your business network security.

Category	Specification
Firewall Inspection Throughput	3.5 Gbps
Threat Prevention Throughput	1.5 Gbps
Application Inspection Throughput	2 Gbps
IPS Throughput	2 Gbps
Anti-Malware Inspection Throughput	2 Gbps
TLS/SSL Inspection and Decryption Throughput	600 Mbps
IPSEC VPN Throughput	1.6 Gbps
Connections per Second	15,000
Max Connections (SPI)	1,100,000
Site-to-Site VPN Tunnels	200
Single Sign-On (SSO) Users	1,000
Interfaces	8 x 1GbE Cu 2 x 5G/2.5G/1G SFP+ 1 console (Micro-USB) 1 USB (type-C)
Wireless Support	2x2 802.11ax (TZ380W)

Aside from the specifications, other notable features to highlight include Cloud Secure Edge Connector and Capture ATP with RTDMI, and overall simplified management. The aim here is to deliver unwavering real-time threat prevention from a proactive standpoint instead of reacting to security issues before it’s too late.

Use Cases and Deployment Scenarios

For the most part, the TZ380 is ideal for small businesses, branch offices, and remote sites. Nevertheless, don’t let that deter you from the fact that it’s delivering enterprise-level security. Its compact form-factor, coupled with high throughput capability, makes it more than suitable for those who are working in smaller spaces.

The zero-touch deployment is a big focal point here as well. In other words, the rollout couldn’t be any simpler, and is great for minimizing IT workload and operational disruption.

Furthermore, you get the support you need to run a hybrid network thanks to the seamless integration of cloud services and remote applications. Outside of benefits, use cases, and deployment options, it’s equally important to consider long-term maintenance.

Maintenance, Updates, and Ongoing Support

If you want to make sure you’re getting the most out of your firewall hardware, there’s definitely a bit of upkeep involved. For starters, regular firmware updates are a part of maintaining performance, fixing vulnerabilities, and getting access to new security features.

Check out the list below for a more comprehensive approach to maintaining your firewall solutions:

Always ensure your firewall is updated to the latest version of firmware
Regularly update malware, ransomware, and intrusion detection signatures
Enable and monitor features like RFDPI and Capture ATP for real-time threat detection
Stay on top of centralized management to enforce consistent security policies
Continuously review logs, alerts, and reporting dashboards to identify anomalies
Consider deployment guidance, configuration optimization, and threat assessment services

While this is all entirely manageable on your own, however, that doesn’t mean you have to do it alone. Managed services can be a game-changer for long-term maintenance. Not only does this help with security upkeep, but it also reduces in-house IT costs and overall time spent. This is especially true for smaller organizations that don’t have the manpower needed to maintain firewall hardware in the long run.

The Final Word

Although you have plenty of firewalls to choose from, the TZ380 is a next generation firewall appliance that’s perfect for small but growing businesses. It delivers the comprehensive, layered security you need within an easily manageable format.

Don’t forget, professional services can help put you on the right track here if you’re still unsure about what firewall models are best for your operation. Don’t hesitate to get in touch with our team at Firewalls.com for the expert insight you need to protect your network for years to come.

FAQ

What is the SonicWall TZ380?

Endpoint Protection Platforms for Business Network Security

Lucas Modrall — Thu, 21 May 2026 12:00:47 +0000

Endpoint protection platforms are an essential angle to securing a modern business network. Aside from the fact that your network is a primary target, traditional perimeter defenses and antivirus tools aren’t enough in today’s world.

Considering the accessibility to AI, behavioral analysis, and threat intelligence, it doesn’t hurt to broaden the scope of your cybersecurity strategy. More specifically, this article will focus on several endpoint solutions, each offering diverse and robust protection in their own way.

Key Takeaways:

Endpoint protection platforms are critical for securing modern business networks beyond traditional antivirus
They use AI, behavioral analysis, and EDR to stop advanced threats like ransomware and zero-day attacks
SonicWall Capture Client and Sophos Central offer centralized, scalable protection
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager and WatchGuard Panda Endpoint focus on cloud-based simplicity and visibility
Choosing the right endpoint platform depends on business needs, scale, and integration requirements

What are Endpoint Protection Platforms and Why They Matter

Securing devices like laptops, servers, and mobile phones, endpoint security solutions combine multiple security functions into a centralized system. They add to the visibility, policy enforcement, and threat response you need. This is especially true considering many workforces are either a hybrid or a fully remote environment.

Here are a few important details you’ll want to keep in mind:

Traditional antivirus software relies on signature-based detection, limiting effectiveness against new threats
Modern endpoint security solutions use AI, behavioral analysis, and EDR for real-time threat detection
Endpoint security helps prevent advanced threats like ransomware, zero-day exploits, and fileless attacks
They can also isolate compromised devices and stop lateral movement early on

Aside from being their own security solution, this type of endpoint support commonly integrates with firewalls, SIEM, and identity systems, strengthening layered security. In a similar fashion to many network security solutions, you have quite a few endpoint security tools to choose from.

4 Top Endpoint Protection Platforms from Leading Security Providers

If you’re looking for some of the leading endpoint protection platforms, you’re in good hands with the likes of SonicWall, Sophos, WatchGuard, and Cisco Meraki. While these aren’t the only options on the market, you won’t have to doubt the quality of endpoint security they can provide.

Whether it’s Capture Client, Sophos Central, or another popular solution, they’re designed to improve visibility and secure your endpoints. Of course, what ends up being best for you is a mix of your own security needs and what these services can bring to the table.

1. SonicWall Capture Client

Utilizing a dual-engine strategy, SonicWall’s Capture Client uses SentinelOne NGAV and Capture ATP for a layered threat defense. It guarantees a high-efficacy detection, including real-time analysis, and advanced memory inspection (RTDMI).

Moreover, you’re getting the promise of reduced complexity through centralized policy management that’s easily scalable. As expected, it’s a great option if you’re already working with SonicWall’s ecosystem, whether it’s firewalls, cloud security, and more. Overall, it’s a great option for deep threat detection and investigation, in addition to rapid response with autonomous remediation.

2. Sophos Central

When looking into Sophos Central solutions, you’ll find there are actually quite a few options on deck. The specifics of what you get for endpoint security depend on which solution you go with. However, it’s safe to expect synchronized security, with one of their leading options being Intercept X for endpoint security and XDR capabilities.

Sophos Central does well to detect and respond to sophisticated, multi-layer attacks by efficiently correlating data across your systems. In addition, add-ons like MDR, email security, mobile management, and device encryption are upsides here as well. In short, these Sophos solutions are great for organizations needing scalable, centralized security with the added benefit of proactive threat management.

3. Cisco Meraki Systems Manager

A cloud-native endpoint management platform, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager enterprise solution is built with scalability and simplicity at the forefront. It’s a part of the broader Cisco Meraki ecosystem, giving you the promise of centralized device control.

Moreover, the tool enables unified endpoint management (UEM) between laptops, mobile devices, and even tablets. You get a single dashboard that makes remote provisioning, policy enforcement, and monitoring as easy as it should be. What makes it stand out is that it’s an ideal solution for cloud-first organizations and IT teams that need endpoint security that’s easy to manage.

4. WatchGuard Panda Endpoint Solutions

Amongst the range of endpoint protection platforms WatchGuard Panda offers, this one is also a cloud-native endpoint solution. To help summarize things a bit, you get the help of centralized management for securing all of your endpoints.

The overall design of their solutions are built to defend against the likes of malware, ransomware, and a variety of other advanced threats. In addition to that, you can leverage behavioral analytics and machine learning to handle unknown threats. If you’re looking for something scalable and suited for distributed environments, WatchGuard Panda Endpoint is a great way to go.

Endpoint Security Tools Comparison

As with any network security product, it can be challenging to stay on top of all of the differences. Considering each option is stellar in its own way, you have to slim down the specifics and compare those against your own network demands. The table below helps to summarize several categories about each of these endpoint solutions.

Endpoint Solution	Core Approach	Key Capabilities	Ecosystem Integration	Ideal Use Case
SonicWall Capture Client	Dual-engine endpoint protection combining SentinelOne NGAV + Capture ATP	Real-time threat detection, RTDMI deep memory inspection, rollback, autonomous remediation, web filtering, device control, deep visibility	Tight integration with SonicWall ecosystem (firewalls, Cloud Secure Edge, MDR, and more)	Small businesses and distributed enterprises needing strong layered protection and firewall synergy
Sophos Central	Cloud-native synchronized security platform with XDR-driven protection	Intercept X endpoint protection, XDR/EDR correlation, MDR services, email security, mobile management, device encryption, phishing defense	Unified security across endpoint, server, email, and network with synchronized threat intelligence	Mid-sized to enterprise organizations needing centralized, scalable, and proactive threat management
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager	Cloud-first unified endpoint management (UEM) platform	MDM, automated provisioning, policy enforcement, app control, device wipe (full/selective), visibility and diagnostics, containerization	Deep integration within Cisco Meraki ecosystem for centralized IT control	Cloud-first businesses and lean IT teams prioritizing simplicity and scalable device management
WatchGuard Panda Endpoint	AI-driven cloud-native endpoint security platform	EDR, behavioral analytics, machine learning detection, threat intelligence, real-time protection, centralized management	Integrated within WatchGuard security stack (email security, patch management, encryption, systems management)	Distributed organizations needing scalable, AI-enhanced endpoint protection across environments

Sure, these aren’t the only options you have to choose from on the market, but they’re definitely a good start. At first, it’s about keeping your options open. However, with these details, you can narrow down what works best for you in the long run.

Let’s Wrap Up

Endpoint protection platforms are a must-have for any modern business network environment. The scope of traditional antivirus had its day, but your security strategy needs much more than that alone. Leading platforms like SonicWall Capture Client, Sophos Central, Cisco’s Systems Manager, and WatchGuard Panda have you covered from more than one angle.

At the end of the day, strong endpoint security comes from a layered defense with a strong focus on centralized visibility. As always, you can have a one-on-one with a team member here at Firewalls.com for a more personalized recommendation on what endpoint solution is best for your operation.

FAQ

What is an Endpoint Protection Platform?

Cisco Network Hardware: Exploring the Small Business-Ready MX64 Firewall

Lucas Modrall — Wed, 20 May 2026 12:00:20 +0000

A reliable part of the Cisco network hardware lineup, the MX64 is a cloud-managed firewall that has been supporting small business networks for years. Moreover, it has always been seen as a great option for companies needing simple, centralized network security.

It’s important to note that the Meraki MX firewall met its end of sale in 2022, and its end-of-life (EOL) date is coming in July 2027. This article highlights some of its best features, how to take full advantage of what it’s capable of, and how to prepare for a transition down the road.

Key Takeaways:

The Cisco MX64 is a cloud-managed firewall designed for small businesses and branch office deployments
It delivers core security features like VPN, SD-WAN, traffic shaping, and basic UTM capabilities
The MX64 reached end-of-sale in 2022 and will reach end-of-life in July 2027
It uses a tiered licensing model to scale security features
Businesses should plan upgrades within the Cisco Meraki ecosystem for performance continuity and an easy transition

Why the Meraki MX64 Still Matters

The scope of Meraki firewall models are widely used in small businesses and distributed enterprise environments. This is heavily due to its overall reliability, scalability, and security capabilities.

Here’s why the MX64 still matters for existing users:

Cisco’s ecosystem supports routing, switching, and security for small offices to large global networks
Even as a part of older Meraki firewalls, the MX64 continues to demonstrate the value of cloud-managed simplicity
It remains relevant as a unified security appliance, combining VPN, traffic control, and basic UTM features
The firewall device still serves as a functional baseline for understanding MX capabilities before it’s time to upgrade

Whether you’re an existing user or just discovering the MX64 for the first time, it’s one of the best starting points for small to growing networks. While its EOL is on the way in 2027, you can still make the most of it until it’s time to climb the ranks in Meraki firewalls.

Cisco Meraki MX64 Firewall Overview

The Cisco Meraki MX64 may be one of many entry-level firewalls, but it provides an impressive security performance in its own right. From small offices to branch deployments, it’s able to support 26 to 35 users.

Moreover, the firewall hardware is lightweight and prioritizes simplicity and cloud manageability over high-performance processing. Part of what makes it so easy to adapt to is that it enables centralized cloud-based security control.

This supports network control between multiple small locations from a single dashboard, a breeze. For a little more context, the table below offers some insight into what you can get out of the specifications.

Specifications	Cisco Meraki MX64
Firewall Throughput	250 Mbps
Advanced Security Throughput	200 Mbps
Max VPN Throughput	100 Mbps
Max Concurrent VPN tunnels	50
WAN Interfaces	1 x GbE RJ45 1 x USB 1 x GbE RJ45 (Dual-purpose)
LAN Interfaces	4 x GbE RJ45

Cisco network firewalls are surprisingly easy to understand if you’ve never looked into them. Outside of the cloud-focused nature of this firewall, the fine print is easy to digest for new and growing companies. Nevertheless, another focal point on making the most out of this firewall is understanding the capabilities of its security licenses.

Security Licensing Options for Cisco Network Hardware

For those who aren’t already aware, the MX64 utilizes a tiered licensing model. This gives you the ability to scale security features based on business needs as they change over time. Overall, you have three main options to choose from here.

Enterprise License

With this particular license, site-to-site VPN is enabled, and it includes SD-WAN capabilities for optimized and flexible traffic routing. Moreover, it also offers traffic shaping and prioritization to manage bandwidth for critical apps.

It works as a foundational layer for managing small business network firewalls and focuses on essential connectivity and performance. Keep in mind, this license skips out on the advanced security add-ons.

Advanced Security License

If you go this route, you’ll get content and web search filtering to easily control user internet access. The security license also includes an intrusion prevention system, which is powered by Cisco SNORT tech.

In addition to this, your network benefits from Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) and enhanced visibility into threats and network activity. All in all, the Advanced Security License converts the MX64 into a full UTM security appliance.

Secure SD-WAN Plus Security License

For those hoping for something more feature-rich, the Secure SD-WAN Plus License isn’t a bad way to go. It enables cloud-based centralized management and even supports Auto VPN for automatic, secure site-to-site connectivity.

You can’t forget the upside of zero-touch provisioning, and the 24/7 enterprise-level support doesn’t hurt either. In short, this license is best suited for distributed Meraki firewall environments needing scalable control and simplicity.

Scaling Beyond the Cisco Network Hardware MX64

Regardless of how viable the MX64 may still be for small businesses, that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be prepared for an upgrade. Considering the EOL date is coming mid-2027, it’s best to keep your options open ahead of time.

Thankfully, Cisco Meraki hardware offers a clear upgrade path, with numerous options to choose from. Organizations can easily transition from one model to the next. In addition to that, the cloud-based policy migration helps preserve existing configuration and security rules during upgrades.

Staying within the Meraki lineup guarantees a consistent dashboard and unified firewall management setup. With this ecosystem-focused approach, you can minimize network strain and potentially disrupting your daily operations.

As always, managed services are also an option if you want to take this task entirely off your plate. Not only does this help with firewall transitions, but it also offers the support you need for setup, 24/7 monitoring, and expert guidance with every necessary step.

The Final Word

When it comes to Cisco network hardware, the MX64 is undoubtedly a reliable entry-level cloud-managed solution. From essential security features like SD-WAN, VPN, and basic UTM, it was a great starter option for younger companies.

Nevertheless, the MX64’s EOL shows up in 2027, and companies should start planning upgrades early to avoid any security limitations. Of course, we’re here when you’re ready to make a transition, so don’t hesitate to contact our team at Firewalls.com for the long-term support your business network needs.

FAQ

Is the Cisco Meraki MX64 Still Supported?