<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Fit Forum Research</title>
	
	<link>http://research.fitforum.org</link>
	<description>Articles of Interest on Human Fit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FitForumResearch" /><feedburner:info uri="fitforumresearch" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Balance of power and influence in relationships: The role of self-monitoring</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/IWDRAcTA16w/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/balance-of-power-and-influence-in-relationships-the-role-of-self-monitoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance Of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power And Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/balance-of-power-and-influence-in-relationships-the-role-of-self-monitoring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; carry on reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; <a href="http://spr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/27/1/23?rss=1">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=405&type=feed" alt=" Balance of power and influence in relationships: The role of self monitoring"  title="Balance of power and influence in relationships: The role of self monitoring" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/IWDRAcTA16w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/balance-of-power-and-influence-in-relationships-the-role-of-self-monitoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/balance-of-power-and-influence-in-relationships-the-role-of-self-monitoring/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>First, organize 1,000</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/YEcpayVpu4w/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/first-organize-1000-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Fans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/first-organize-1000-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Kelly really changed our thinking with his post about 1,000 true fans.
But what if you&#8217;re not an artist or a musician? Is there a business case for this?&#8230; carry on reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Kelly really changed our thinking with <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/03/1000_true_fans.php">his post about 1,000 true fans.</a></p>
<p>But what if you&#8217;re not an artist or a musician? Is there a business case for this?&#8230; <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/sethsmainblog/~3/Q2Mz0_dfjDY/first-organize-1000.html">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=404&type=feed" alt=" First, organize 1,000"  title="First, organize 1,000" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/YEcpayVpu4w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/first-organize-1000-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/first-organize-1000-2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>First, organize 1,000</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/LtTC1MSWyI4/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/first-organize-1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Fans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/first-organize-1000/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Kevin Kelly really changed our thinking with his post about 1,000 true fans.
But what if you&#8217;re not an artist or a musician? Is there a business case fo
&#8230; carry on reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Kevin Kelly really changed our thinking with <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/03/1000_true_fans.php">his post about 1,000 true fans.</a></p>
<p>But what if you&#8217;re not an artist or a musician? Is there a business case fo</p></div>
<p>&#8230; <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/12/first-organize-1000.html">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=403&type=feed" alt=" First, organize 1,000"  title="First, organize 1,000" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/LtTC1MSWyI4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/first-organize-1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/first-organize-1000/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do Groups Get Stuck?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/44BxUaP-hi0/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/why-do-groups-get-stuck-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colleagues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complete List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poor Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Members]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working With Groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worklife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/why-do-groups-get-stuck-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Working with groups to move towards a more civil, respectful worklife can require some hard slogging at times. But shouldn&#8217;t it be easy? What benefit can come from being unpleasant to your colleagues?
I&#8217;ve consider four possible dynamics in a new post, http://bit.ly/55ZUxd
•	cognitive processes,
•	the work itself,
•	poor leadership fit, and
•	the social dynamics among team members.
Does this seem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working with groups to move towards a more civil, respectful worklife can require some hard slogging at times. But shouldn&#8217;t it be easy? What benefit can come from being unpleasant to your colleagues?<br />
I&#8217;ve consider four possible dynamics in a new post, http://bit.ly/55ZUxd<br />
•	cognitive processes,<br />
•	the work itself,<br />
•	poor leadership fit, and<br />
•	the social dynamics among team members.<br />
Does this seem like a complete list to you?<br />
Can you add to it?<br />
I&#8217;d appreciate it.</p>
<p>Michael&#8230; <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/answers/management/organizational-development/MGM_ODV/606993-22315082">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=402&type=feed" alt=" Why do Groups Get Stuck?"  title="Why do Groups Get Stuck?" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/44BxUaP-hi0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/why-do-groups-get-stuck-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/why-do-groups-get-stuck-2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Call for Papers: "Studying Change Dynamics Using Qualitative Methods"</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/8gY_SOP0Avg/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/call-for-papers-studying-change-dynamics-using-qualitative-methods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call For Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change Dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualitative Methods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/call-for-papers-studying-change-dynamics-using-qualitative-methods/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; carry on reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; <a href="http://jab.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/45/4/465?rss=1">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=401&type=feed" alt=" Call for Papers: &quot;Studying Change Dynamics Using Qualitative Methods&quot;"  title="Call for Papers: &quot;Studying Change Dynamics Using Qualitative Methods&quot;" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/8gY_SOP0Avg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/call-for-papers-studying-change-dynamics-using-qualitative-methods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/call-for-papers-studying-change-dynamics-using-qualitative-methods/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do Groups Get Stuck?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/b2XK_B5CBEI/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/why-do-groups-get-stuck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/why-do-groups-get-stuck/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; carry on reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/answers/management/organizational-development/MGM_ODV/606993-22315082">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=400&type=feed" alt=" Why do Groups Get Stuck?"  title="Why do Groups Get Stuck?" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/b2XK_B5CBEI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/why-do-groups-get-stuck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/why-do-groups-get-stuck/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>We Hire For Difference and Fire Because They Are Not the Same</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/Z9kaK28e-wo/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/we-hire-for-difference-and-fire-because-they-are-not-the-same-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conscious Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity Workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotional Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Liswood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listening Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managing Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Value]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/we-hire-for-difference-and-fire-because-they-are-not-the-same-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Bringing true diversity to the workplace is a lot harder than we thought. It is more than just playing Noah and getting the numbers right—two of every kind. But, too often that’s as far as it goes. What is needed, says Laura Liswood in The Loudest Duck, is “more sophisticated leadership, conscious awareness, thought, behavior, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.leadershipnow.com/leadershop/9780470485842.html"><img src="http://www.leadershipnow.com/leadershop/images/new/9780470485842sm.jpg" width="80" height="120" border="0" alt="The Loudest Duck" title="We Hire For Difference and Fire Because They Are Not the Same" /></a></div>
<p>Bringing true diversity to the workplace is a lot harder than we thought. It is more than just playing Noah and getting the numbers right—two of every kind. But, too often that’s as far as it goes. What is needed, says Laura Liswood in <a href="http://www.leadershipnow.com/leadershop/9780470485842.html" title="The Loudest Duck"><i>The Loudest Duck</i></a>, is “more sophisticated leadership, conscious awareness, thought, behavior, and tools to reap the benefits of what true diversity can provide.”</p>
<p>Diversity has to be something deeper. True diversity requires a change in attitude and thinking. It requires a change in the way we think about people that are different—age, gender, race, accent, appearance, background, personality, religion or education—than we are. We all have unconscious reactions to people that are different. Liswood writes, “We are not talking about blatant inequities or discrimination in most of today’s professional world (although this still does occur). <b>We are talking about unconscious belief, preferences, values, thoughts, and actions. These are what erode the promise of diversity.</b>” To achieve true diversity, we need to examine what we believe; beliefs that we begin to develop at a very early age and continue to learn and reinforce throughout our lives.</p>
<p>“Getting true value out of diversity is much harder than was initially thought….Managing diversity requires heightened emotional intelligence, awareness, observation, and listening skills.” At the same time, Liswood argues, “employees have to take it upon themselves to get out of their comfort zones and learn to adjust to a company’s style, but not in a manner that merely shows compliance.” In today’s environment, whether the loudest duck gets heard or whether it gets its head chopped off, is not only a management issue, but additionally a large part of the responsibility lies with every individual to develop awareness and an understanding of what works and when in their particular situation. Throughout the book she offers tools and approaches to help you stretch yourself in the workplace. </p>
<p>The phrase “<b>We hire for difference and fire because they are not the same</b>,” sums up the dynamic very well. <a href="http://www.leadershipnow.com/leadershop/9780470485842.html" title="The Loudest Duck"><i>The Loudest Duck</i></a> provides a framework to begin to do the inner work necessary to bring about true diversity. </p>
<p>The thing is, if you are not <b><i>consciously inclusive</i></b> of everyone, you will <b><i>unconsciously narrow</i></b> the type of players in your organization and never reap the benefits of true diversity. Accepting every kind of person is much harder than it sounds because we judge people differently based on our own internal filtering system that tells us what to value and what to ignore or tolerate. That’s where diversity needs to take hold if it is ever going to take hold in our organizations or in our communities&#8230;. <a href="http://www.leadershipnow.com/leadingblog/2009/12/we_hire_for_difference_and_fir.html">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=399&type=feed" alt=" We Hire For Difference and Fire Because They Are Not the Same"  title="We Hire For Difference and Fire Because They Are Not the Same" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/Z9kaK28e-wo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/we-hire-for-difference-and-fire-because-they-are-not-the-same-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/we-hire-for-difference-and-fire-because-they-are-not-the-same-2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>We Hire For Difference and Fire Because They Are Not the Same</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/ZT4V75DdFwE/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/we-hire-for-difference-and-fire-because-they-are-not-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/we-hire-for-difference-and-fire-because-they-are-not-the-same/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; carry on reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; <a href="http://www.leadershipnow.com/leadingblog/2009/12/we_hire_for_difference_and_fir.html">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=398&type=feed" alt=" We Hire For Difference and Fire Because They Are Not the Same"  title="We Hire For Difference and Fire Because They Are Not the Same" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/ZT4V75DdFwE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/we-hire-for-difference-and-fire-because-they-are-not-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/we-hire-for-difference-and-fire-because-they-are-not-the-same/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>One employee’s workplace banter may turn into another’s tribunal claim for offensive behaviour</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/iZaoLXm-ktc/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/one-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-into-anothers-tribunal-claim-for-offensive-behaviour-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offensive Behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribunal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/one-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-into-anothers-tribunal-claim-for-offensive-behaviour-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employers have been warned that using the terms &#8216;love&#8217; or &#8216;babe&#8217; in the workplace could result in them facing tribunal action.
&#8230; carry on reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employers have been warned that using the terms &#8216;love&#8217; or &#8216;babe&#8217; in the workplace could result in them facing tribunal action.</p>
<p>&#8230; <a href="http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/news/rss/970937/One-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-anothers-tribunal-claim-offensive-behaviour/">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=397&type=feed" alt=" One employees workplace banter may turn into anothers tribunal claim for offensive behaviour"  title="One employees workplace banter may turn into anothers tribunal claim for offensive behaviour" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/iZaoLXm-ktc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/one-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-into-anothers-tribunal-claim-for-offensive-behaviour-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/one-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-into-anothers-tribunal-claim-for-offensive-behaviour-2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>One employee’s workplace banter may turn into another’s tribunal claim for offensive behaviour</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~3/YkqqpDrHYBs/</link>
		<comments>http://research.fitforum.org/one-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-into-anothers-tribunal-claim-for-offensive-behaviour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fit Forum Tagging Machine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From the feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offensive Behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribunal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.fitforum.org/one-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-into-anothers-tribunal-claim-for-offensive-behaviour/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; carry on reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; <a href="http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/news/rss/970937/One-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-anothers-tribunal-claim-offensive-behaviour/">carry on reading</a>.</p>
<img src="http://research.fitforum.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=396&type=feed" alt=" One employees workplace banter may turn into anothers tribunal claim for offensive behaviour"  title="One employees workplace banter may turn into anothers tribunal claim for offensive behaviour" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FitForumResearch/~4/YkqqpDrHYBs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.fitforum.org/one-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-into-anothers-tribunal-claim-for-offensive-behaviour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://research.fitforum.org/one-employees-workplace-banter-may-turn-into-anothers-tribunal-claim-for-offensive-behaviour/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
