Fletcher's Castoria

Teaching to the Test

2012-02-10T03:10:00.000-08:00

Apparently the Lion of the Senate, Ted Kennedy, roared a little too loudly when he helped construct the "No Child Left Behind" legislation during the early Bush-43 years. For now, about ten years later, another Democrat reformer, The Barry, has declared this law too draconian and granted ten states exemptions to its provisions (with 28 more states to follow) -- another of the many examples of executive ukase under this regime. (See: L.A. Times Story). In announcing this one of his many end-runs around Congress, Obama declared that this attempt to increase students' proficiencies across our nation was "teaching to the test." This is precisely the same liberal canard that has been used in Massachusetts to deprecate the MCAS testing here (Massachusetts, of course, was one of the ten states granted a waver.)

And this is despite (or maybe "because of"?) the dramatic spending increases that Arne Duncan has enjoyed during his tenure aas head of the Department of Education -- $39.9 billion in his first year (fiscal 2009) with the President's budget calling for $68.0 billion in fiscal 2012 (see: Department of Education Spending and click on the Excel table). And I seem to recall the hoopla surrounding Duncan's appointment where his credentials and rhetoric suggested that his entire raison d'être was to improve the testing results of United States students. Apparently the air has gone out of this balloon ... to be replaced by a condom?

For more of my thoughts on this subject see: Duncan Donuts.

Culture Warrior

2012-02-09T07:48:00.000-08:00

Apparently the race for the Republican Presidential nomination has shifted away from fixing our economic malaise and reining-in our national deficits toward the remedying of traditional right-wing cultural issues ... abortion, gay marriage and sterilization services. The evidence for this is Rick Santorum's three primary/caucus victories in Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri on Tuesday. Some of the precipitating events for these upsets occurring, I think, may be the better-than-expected unemployment statistics that were recently released by the Obama administration ... coupled with the recent HHS's Sebelius's abortion/sterilization health-care-coverage edict that has roiled the Catholic Church ... and the recent overturning of the gay-marriage ban in California by the 9th Circuit of Appeals.

My take on this political sea change is that it is a huge mistake on the part of American conservatives. To paraphrase James Carville ... "it was, is and will be the economy stupid." I honestly believe that we have not yet even begun to reverse our forced march toward national penury.

Hazing

2012-02-08T05:06:00.000-08:00

Navy SEAL hopefuls in the surf

I find it interesting how the purposeful shifting of semantics is often used to achieve social and political ends. There is currently a brewing brouhaha at Dartmouth College about hazing ... spawned, in my opinion, by a vindictive fraternity member who was ratted out by his brothers for his drug use and then, also in my opinion, concocted a bizarre story about his hazing experiences. He has now gone national with this narrative and, as a consequence, hazing is rapidly becoming a cause célèbre. The word "hazing" is taking on relatively new and ominously pejorative tone that is being used not only to bash such previously tacitly accepted practices ... but also to attack fraternities in general.

Let me be clear, initiation rites when practiced with sadistic intentions are wrong, but finding a bright line between cruelty and those ordeals designed to encourage institutional loyalty and unit cohesion is sometimes difficult to define. May I present some examples to illustrate my point:

- The Navy SEALs undergo extreme and rigorous "training" (see: Navy SEAL Training) in which the drop-out rate is about 90%. This training is quite successful ... witness the series of dramatic victories this unit has achieved in recent years. However, this training does include one section that one might classify as somewhat sadistic, viz:

Another important part of basic conditioning is drown-proofing. In this evolution, trainees must learn to swim with both their hands and their feet bound. To pass drown-proofing, trainees enter a 9-foot-deep pool and complete the following steps with their hands and feet tied: bob for 5 minutes, float for 5 minutes, swim 100 meters, bob for 2 minutes, do some forward and backward flips, swim to the bottom of the pool and retrieve an object with their teeth, and then return to the surface and bob five more times

- The Stations of the Cross that Jesus Christ had to endure ... possibly even endorsed by God himself ... have always appeared to be a bit sadistic. Flogging, spearing, a crown of thorns, a vinegar drink, etc. ... as well as the crucifixion itself, may all have been ordeals ordained to create a cohesive empathy among the Christian community. I think it has worked.

- Discipline aboard British naval sailing ships was quite brutal and often sadistic. However, it did help propel the English navy to world dominance. One needs only read some of Patrick O'Brian's books such as Master and Commander to understand how the savage discipline aboard these man-o-wars was required to insure that the crew acted as a well-oiled unit when the bigger tests came ... naval battles when all their lives were on the line.

- Even though it is just mythology, the Twelve Labors of Hercules were ordeals mandated by Hera to test Hercules's strength and make him atone for his crimes. However, being made to clean the Augean stables in one day seems a little over-the-top sadistic to me.

There are numerous other examples of initiation ceremonies ... such as the sometimes weird Neptune frivolities celebrated when crossing the equator aboard ship, "boys will be boys" pranks in English public schools (read a few Harry Potter books), the current exposure of bullying in U.S. High Schools, and even that which is shown in al Qaeda propaganda training films.

Although a noble objective, the current mania to banish sadism from the human psyche may (hopefully) cause pause among some initiators ... but I seriously doubt that "hazing", under whatever semantic form, will ever disappear entirely from our societies ... because it sometimes does seem to have a meaningful purpose.

Cowed

2012-02-06T06:53:00.000-08:00

I have been threatened with excommunication from the Church of Conventional Wisdom unless I stop my incessant attacks against Barack Obama on this blog. So I am duely cowed and will herein provide some selected kudos to the White House and its apparatchiks for their successes over the last three years. As well as I can remember I now offer these paeans to our President for:

1) The Navy Seals' 2009 sniper killing of those Somali pirates after they had captured a U.S. merchant vessel (see: ABC News Account)
2) The increased tempo of U.S. drone attacks in Yemen, Afghanistan and Pakistan which have killed many al Qaeda and Taliban higher-ups.
3) The Navy Seals' bold 2011 attack inside Pakistan and the resultant killing of Osama Bin Laden (see: ABC News Account )
4) The Navy-Seal recent rescue of two Americans aid workers in Somali (see: ABC News Account)
5) The Navy Seals' early 2011 killing of two Somali pirates after they had killed four Americans in their yacht off the Somali coast (see: NY Times Account)
6) Last year, the U.S.'s. seccessful backseat overthrow and snuffing of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya (see: Reuters Account)

Other than Obama's examplar family life, this is all I can immediately bring to mind without contacting David Axelrod for help.

Actually, come this fall, I might be tempted to write in a vote for the head of the Navy Seals for President ...

"Lucy

2012-02-03T10:14:00.000-08:00

Lucille Ball

you got some splainin' to do" ... In this case "Lucy" is the Bureau of Labor Statistics. We were greeted this morning with some encouraging employment numbers (see: LA Times Story). In particular, this nation's unemployment rate has dropped to 8.3%. As is my wont, I then went to the source data at the Bureau to see what was what (see: CPS Tables and click on the HTML version of the A-1 table under Monthly Household Data). And what I found was puzzling ... the civilian noninstitutional population (a non-seasonally-adjusted number) increased by almost 1.7 million in the month of January alone. This compares to an average increase throughout all of 2011 of around 140 thousand per month. This makes the current figure over 12 times higher than what might be considered normal! This is certainly an outlying statistical jump and needs to be explained if one is to understand (and maybe even trust) these new good unemployment numbers.

My guess -- perhaps it is the huge jump in foreign nationals entering the U.S. to take jobs not given ... or maybe not even offered to U.S. citizens (see: Numbers USA) and this needs to be accounted for by the Bureau ... and it chose to do so all in the month of January.

And also please note the very large pop in the number of people who have left the labor force in January ... almost 1.2 million versus an average of 215 thousand per month throughout 2011. This is up by a factor of almost 6! I find this too to be somewhat strange.

So, although the reported unemployment numbers do appear to be encouraging for our economic prospects, I am not doing cartwheels quite yet.

Safety Net

2012-02-02T11:39:00.000-08:00

Mitt Romney recently said that he is not worried about the poor ... they have a safety net ... and if the net is broken, he will fix it. Most "pundits" on the left and the right consider this a major gaff that Romney needs to walk back. I'm not quite so sure. I believe that the safety net that our European-style welfare economy has constructed is nearly as universal as humanly possible ... and our politicians constantly vie to outdo each other finding even newer benefits. I recently wrote about how the poor in this country are now getting free cell phones (see: Alphabet Soup). Now I read that our safety net includes another goodie -- nearly free high-speed Internet access (see: NY Post Article). Wow! We middle-class schlubs are paying north of $50 per month for broadband Internet access. So this reduced fee ($10 per month) then amounts to about another $480 per year of cost forgiveness (this time, courtesy of The Barry) to those who already have a myriad of government benefits.

I would really love to see a definitive financial spreadsheet of all this government largess (Section-8 housing, heating assistance, Medicaid, free school lunches, free cell phones, SSI, cash aid to dependent families, food stamps/EBT cards, free transportation, earned-income tax credits, reduced Internet costs, educational grants, etc. etc.) that a go-getting welfare family does, in fact, receive. I suspect such a compendium would show few if any holes in the safety net and shock the American public into a movement toward real welfare reform. Were this to happen, Romney's words may not be so damaging after all.

Faceplant

2012-02-02T05:41:00.000-08:00

I have an incurable disease ... old-fogeyism. As a result I have no business blogging about Facebook. I don't understand its popularity. And I don't understand its intricate mechanics ... nor do I care to learn. Somehow I have gotten registered as one of its billion or so users and keep getting those annoying messages that there are things pending for me there. Yawn ... It is just one more cyber-technology I would prefer not letting into my life. Ditto Twitter. Texting has me perplexed. Why would one take the time to type a message to someone when one's voice message is oodles more efficient? And I keep hearing ominous things about how Facebook is using or is going to use all the dumb things (I must be careful here ... my daughter is a big user) that its users post on its tens of thousands of racked computers to invade their privacy bubbles. No thanks.

Now, this stupid company is going public this spring with a stock offering which will probably value it close to $100 billion. That's billion ... not million (see ENews Account) ... enough money to rescue Greece from its financial predicament. And that 27-year old puke, Mark Zuckerberg, will become a multi-multi-billionaire (sidebar: I haven't seen the movie, Social Networking, either, nor will I). Is this rational? Not to me ... but it clearly is to the millions of Facebook aficionados who will be clamoring to buy this initial public offering (IPO) which might value Facebook at something like twenty-five times its trailing annual revenues (see: IPO Details). This clearly is insane ... but then so was Google's IPO that came out at $85 per share and is now selling for $580 per share (= a market valuation of $188 billion). So Facebook should get this hyperbolic initial market valuation which will likely then be even more insanely eclipsed by its soaring stock price during its first day of trading.

Caution to all of you who want to take part in this Wall-Street mania ... yes, you might make a pot of money if you buy this stock early-on. But caveat emptor ... at some point this bubble will burst and Facebook will take a faceplant ... it might take days or months or even years. But, be assured, it will happen ... mainly because Facebook's product is so ephemeral. (It might take somewhat longer, but the same fate should also eventually happen to Google.)

Gotta go ... I have to take my Studebaker in for an oil change.

Snowbirds

2012-01-30T11:06:00.000-08:00

It has been estimated that only 2% of the people in the United States (something over 6 million of you) get to be snowbirds (travel to Florida, Mexico, Hawaii, Caribbean, etc.) each winter. This suggests to me a gross inequality in our society that sorely needs to be remedied. Perhaps the Occupiers can broaden out their demonstrations to focus on this class disparity? Thusly, I urge all of you Occupy protesters (who have not already gone south for the winter) to carry pithy signs in Boston, New York, DC, Oakland, etc. next week to urge our government to enable absolutely everyone to escape the northern climes each winter. You need to demand free passage to the lands of sun, surf, and pina coladas.

May I suggest such slogans such as "We are the 98%!" ... "60 SPF for everyone!" ... "Fly me to Cancun!" ... "We demand Rum and Coke!" ... "If Capitalism is just, it will give me tan lines!" And, in order to get even greater notice in the national media, you might also get some comely topless lasses to join you in these protestations.

Afterthought: The question poses itself -- How is our government going to pay for this new 98%-er entitlement? Perhaps the 2%-ers should be assessed their prorated share of this total amount (including The Barry's Hawaii sojourns) as a surtax on their airline tickets?

Pants on Fire

2012-01-28T04:08:00.000-08:00

In his State of the Union address last week The Barry said, "In the last 22 months, businesses have created more than 3 million jobs." Let us now see if this is factual. From the Bureau of Labor Statistics own A-1 seasonally adjusted tables (see: CPS Tables and click on the HTML version of the A-1 table under Monthly Household Data) there were 139.9 million people employed in the civilian labor force when Obama took office in January of 2009. In January of 2010, this same number stood at 139.1 million (down 800 thousand). And, at the end of December last year, there were 140.8 million employed according to the same table. This is only an increase of 900 thousand since he took office (while the relevant working-age population grew by 4.8 million) and, up 1.7 million in the last 23 months. This clearly is "not more than 3 million."

That is ... unless Obama is counting what U.S. companies have hired abroad (a possibility) ... or, even more disturbingly, the fact that U.S. companies may be employing slews of foreign nationals instead of U.S. citizens (see: Numbers USA). In any case, I have already heard many Obama surrogates quoting this "fact" and I'm sure that the American public already has this hook and worm well down its gullet.

Moral of the story: "Don't mess with the bully pulpit."

Queuing Up

2012-01-27T01:06:00.000-08:00

Here is a partial list of well-known Republicans (Rush Limbaugh would call them "Establishment Republicans") who are lining up to take their shots at Newt Gingrich:

Ann Coulter

Joe Scarborough (see: The Newt I Knew)

Eliot Abrams

Bob Tyrrell

Bob Dole

Tom DeLay

Matt Drudge

Mark Steyn

Chris Christie

Marco Rubio

Jonah Goldberg

If Gingrich loses in the Florida primary next Tuesday, it may be because of the rotten tomatoes that this group brought to the festivities.

High Dudgeon

2012-01-25T15:26:00.000-08:00

Low Dungeon

I had a encouraging thought I would like to share with you kind (or not-so-kind) readers. This insight is based upon a psychological concept called "cognitive dissonance" ... in other words, that which creates an unsettling of one's psyche becomes a motivating force once things are resolved ... for good or bad. The fact that many Republicans are now in high dudgeon about who will ... and how to beat Barack Obama suggests to me that, once a candidate is settled upon, there will be a spectacular rallying around said candidate. This is a stirring variant of ABO, "anyone but Obama."

I surely hope so.

"His hour upon the stage

2012-01-25T06:04:00.000-08:00

And then is heard no more. It is a tale. Told by [a politician], full of sound and fury. Signifying nothing." Macbeth by Shakespeare Full Text of SOTU Speech

Also see: Krauthammer Comments

Irish Eyes Are Smiling

2012-01-24T10:20:00.000-08:00

John Kerry

Or was it Botox gone bad?

Sheherazade

2012-01-24T07:04:00.000-08:00

In the legend, A Thousand and One Nights, Sheherazade had to tell the Persian king, Shahryar, a compelling story every night for a thousand and one days in order not to be beheaded (see the details here). We now have a modern-day version of this story in that Harry Reid (D) tomorrow will have kept the U.S. Senate from passing a federal budget (as required by the Constitution and follow-on laws) for a thousand and one days. This is in order that the American public doesn't see Democrat fingerprints on our profligate government spending ... and storm the Capitol demanding the Senate's majority leader's head on a platter (see the details here). And we have heard not a peep of protest from The Barry over this dereliction of duty.

We, in the know, have become so jaded by these nose-thumbings at the Constitution by the current Administration that we too often "go along to get along." I don't believe we should be very proud of this complacency. I'm not ... and that is why I have composed this blog complaint. I wish I could do more.

Puzzled?

2012-01-23T08:17:00.000-08:00

Newt Gingrich has claimed that he has been exonerated on all the charges relating to the 1,300 page Congressional ethics investigation document (see: Think Progress). If this were the case, then I must ask ... why did he resign his Speakership, pay a $300,000 fine, and depart Congress?

It would seem to me that, as feisty as Newt is, he would have and should have stood his ground. But he didn't ... and this, to me, is compelling.

Hill and Dale

2012-01-21T01:34:00.000-08:00

Let's look beyond this far-eastern fire drill of the Republican primary ... to this fall when the election is in full swing. Many believe that, if the GOP has gotten its act together by then, The Barry might well have to switch horses and put Hillary Clinton on his ticket as his Veep ... retiring Biden to that stud farm called the State Department. This move would be to bolster his re-election chances with "the devil you know" popularity of Hillary ... attracting those voters who believe she was denied her crown last time around.

Now, apart from the fact that she has bluntly stated multiple times that she is done with politics, Hillary might well be tempted with such an offer ... as it could present a greased slide into the White House in 2016. And, besides, to my continued amazement, most media pundits believe that she has done a bang-up job at Foggy Bottom. So, I think a quick review of her record there is now in order:

- The State Department recently put the kibosh on the Keystone pipeline from Canada (see: Falling Keystone)
- We reopened our embassy in Syria last spring just in time to watch Assad slaughter his people. We may now be embarrassed into reclosing it (see: The Cable Story)
- We totally botched the Egyptian uprisings last spring (see: The Gong Show)
- We sat on our hands when the Iranian street rose up against their oppressive regime in 2009
- Our troop pullout from Iraq has been a clumsy mess, leaving this country to slip back into secular warfare
- Our relations with Pakistan are at the breaking point
- Iran is about ready to produce its first atomic weapon and the United States has stated no coherent strategy to deal with this contingency
- In general, we appeared to be bystanders in the Arab spring
- We seem to be quite timid when dealing with China and its many military and economic threats
- The Euro-zone bogey man is afoot and the United States is hiding under the covers

Need I go on any further? (There's lots more.) Yes, one could say that most of these failings are Obama-inspired, but where was Hillary when these decisions were made? Yes, she has been good at the optics ... willing to travel to these hot spots, pose for pictures, and utter some platitudes, but she has not put forward any overarching policies of her own to deal with the world's turmoil. ("Reset" is hardly an overarching strategy ... I don't even know what it means.) To me, she appears to shrink from these challenges. And, God forbid, Biden tries to fill her shoes. He clearly would screw things up even more ... even if the "San Francisco Giants" win the Super Bowl.

Hell Hath No Fury ...

2012-01-19T09:09:00.000-08:00

Like a woman scorned. Newt Gingrich's second wife, Marianne, has unloaded on Newt in an ABC interview to be aired tonight after the debates (see: Washington Post Story) and two days before the South Carolina primary. Apparently, this scorned woman drops at least one bomb on Newt saying that he requested, after many years of their marriage, that they should have an "open relationship" (each partner would be free to have other love partners).

I don't want to beat a dead horse ... nor do I want to seem to be endorsing Newt Gingrich's candidacy, but would this be a prime-time, network "news" story if it involved either of the Clintons ... particularly prior to their running for office? (This is obviously a rhetorical question.)

DEN left a comment that freezes things on this blog (perhaps Google is trying to tell me something). Anyway here it is:

I think the timing of this "news" is very suspect, and also Marianne is a skank, who knew he was a cheater because she was giving him lewinskis when he was married to #1. Most Gingrich fans will ignore this info (just as I did when you railed about Clinton's dalliences.)

Fewer Happy Returns

2012-01-18T00:50:00.000-08:00

Mitt Romney was asked again in the South Carolina debate Monday night if and when he will release his income tax returns. He indicated that, sometime in April after he has filed his 2011 taxes, he might consider such a move. The question then presents itself -- why not also disclose his prior years?

My guess is that Mitt had been using the "carried interest" section of the tax code in years past (the same methodology that Warren Buffet uses to pay a lower tax rate ... around 15% ... than his secretary), and he plans quietly to abandon this practice in 2011. He also hopes that showing his 2011 returns without this gimmick will satisfy for his critics. Guess again Mitt! If you have used this loophole in the past, it surely will come out (Obama's people do have access to your tax records) ... and probably just before the election ... as an October surprise.

So my suggestion to you Mitt is ... reveal everything now and put it behind you. Say that, even though you (and Warren Buffet) have used this tax loophole, you now believe it to be improper and you will work for its repeal. And, to show your sincerity, you will not use it for your 2011 tax filings, and, in the future, you plan on paying the normal statutory rate, not the carried interest rate (and maybe even urge Warren Buffet to do the same).

It might hurt your image for a while, but I don't think it will cost you the election.

Afterthought: Mitt Romney was on this AM's news saying (late last night) that his effective tax rate was close to 15% since most of his income has been from capital gains. This suggests to me that he has indeed been using the "carried interest" methodology in his tax filings. Now, as a result, our generally financially-illiterate media is starting the drumbeat against our lower 15% capital-gains rate. If the fact that private equity firms and hedge funds have been, in my opinion, abusing "carried interest" to lower their taxes ... causes our equally-naive Congress to abolish a lower capital gains rate, then this would be a great tragedy. They then would be doing what is best described as "pissing in the soup." Please Congress, just eliminate the carried-interest tax loophole.

Ananomous posted a comment that appears to freeze things on this blog and, although I don't concur with it, I will post it here:

Nicholas Kristof writing in NYT recently: "President Obama is pushing to close this loophole. The White House estimates that this would raise $20 billion over a decade. But Congressional Republicans walked out of budget talks rather than discuss raising revenues from measures such as this one."

My comment in reply is:

Kristof worded this salvo very cleverly (I think it's called weasel worded) ... implying that the Republicans are great defenders of "measures such as this one." I strongly suspect it was mainly other things that they had objected to. But still, I hope the Republicans do realize the political folly in defending "carried interest" tax treatments.

DEN posted the following comment (that also freezes things):

I am not against a 15% tax on investment income (i.e.,dividends). But I do object to the Fund Managers' characterization of their compensation for work as "investment" income which avoids paying the payroll taxes for SS and Medicare.

Great Idea ...

2012-01-14T05:33:00.000-08:00

Wrong person. The Barry, in an election-year U-turn is proposing measures that would make our federal government leaner and meaner. See: Earthlink Article. Three measures he has proposed are:

1) merging six major trade and commerce agencies into one and eliminating the Commerce Department, 2) tax incentives to bring jobs back to the U.S., and 3) eliminating corporate tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas (does this include G.E.?).

Now this would be a giant HOORAY if Obama's track record indicated that he was trustworthy on such matters. Unfortunately, he pulled a trillion dollar scam on the American people with the stimulus package in 2009 that did little more than siphon federal tax dollars into public service unions and produced very few "shovel-ready jobs" as promised. So one has to look sideways at this new proposal and expect that, if Congress were to approve it as is (note the corporate tax increases ... most every large company has foreign affiliates), Administration magicians would find some way to augment the Democrat re-election war chest with more resources.

Or, if Congress were not to endorse this pig-in-a-poke proposal, then The Barry would have one more bullet-point to decry in his re-election campaign ... which seems to be pointing toward his running against a "do-nothing" Congress. So the U.S. legislature is boxed in and will probably have to pass such a measure. But, the House of Representatives should take this opportunity to expand this law even further into significant government downsizing and include so many caveats that Obama can't find his way into reversing its effect. Then, if Harry Reid does Obama's dirty work and kills this proposal in the Senate (more do-nothing evidence) ... or, if The Barry wouldn't ink such a measure, then the real purpose of this election-year grandstanding would be revealed ... which, hopefully, would then be communicated to the American public (ha ha).

Capitalism on Trial

2012-01-12T23:33:00.000-08:00

Isn't it funny and, yes, a little frightening that Republican candidates for President like Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry can make blatant anti-capitalism statements for their own seeming political gain? (See details at: Newt's Attack and Perry's Attack.) Fortunately it doesn't seem to have so far worked ... but this is just the beginning of a full-frontal assault on our free-enterprise system that is bound to occur once the presumptive Republican candidate, Mitt Romney, is chosen. He and Bain Capital, the private equity firm he once ran, will be made the poster children of this onslaught. This belligerency is what the Occupiers represented this past summer and fall ... and the surprising sympathy that they received among many media types and left-leaning pols was a omen of what is to come in this fall's election season.

The liberals in the United States have for generations been eating away at the foundations of capitalism ... often funded from the profits gained from the very system they despise. This is despite formidable evidence that capitalism is a wealth generating engine nonpareil and that its many alternatives are not. Just the contrast that is evident in China where merely a soupçon of capitalism has unleashed mighty forces that are propelling this former denier of property rights into an economic powerhouse ... should be enough to convince the Occupiers that their nihilism is futile. But no ... the current economic stagnation in the United States, has inflamed the juices of these anarchists. They would pull down the economic structure of this country around their heads without any thought-through idea of what to build in its stead.

Yes, capitalism does develop some warts from time to time (trusts, insider trading, creative accounting, carried interest, crony capitalism, etc.) but these have, can, or should be easily remedied. And many politicians, unfortunately including Gingrich and Perry, but more predictably including Elizabeth Warren and Barack Obama are more than willing to capitalize on this current anti-capitalist fervor to gain or retain their place at that feeding trough called "big government."

Saturday Night Dead

2012-01-10T23:00:00.000-08:00

Lorne Michaels's Saturday night "comedy" show (Saturday Night Live or SNL) has had quite an impact on Presidential elections. Effectively it killed Gerald Ford's prospects in 1977 when Chevy Chase continually depected him as a clumsy, bumbling fool. (Side note: my wife worked part-time at NBC during this period and it was generally understood that Chevy Chase was an arrogant a-hole.) Then, in the 2008 election, Tina Fey went a long way in destroying John McCain's campaign with her depiction of Sarah Palin as a provincial boob (excuse the expression) with "I can see Russia from my front porch." (Many voters actually believed that the Alaskan Rogue Elephant had said that ... she hadn't.)

Now, that Mitt Romney seems to have wrapped up the Republican nomination, can we now expect that lefty hatchetman, Mr. Michaels, to try once again to enter the voting booths across the country in November and pull the levers by proxy for The Barry? The answer is, of course. The real question is, how will he do this? My prediction is that it will be by either pointing out Mitt's seeming stiffness, his putting his dog's crate on the roof of his car, or his "ruthlessness" as a 1%-er while running Bain capital. Maybe ... and probably ... all three ... possibly even some others too. Also expect the "comedy" writers on The Late Show, The Daily Show and The Colbert Report to do much of the same ... often with a sly vengence.

Wouldn't it be great if somehow Dave Letterman, Lorne Michaels, Stephen Colbert, and Jon Stewart could also be continuously and savagely rediculed on network and cable television? Unfortunately, it will only happen in my dreams ...

Alphabet Soup

2012-01-10T09:44:00.000-08:00

How would you like a free cellphone, no activation fee, no annual contract, and 250 free voice minutes per month? There is yet another government program for U.S. indigent people called Assurance Wireless which is administered by Virgin Wireless (a British company.) This program entitlement is sponsored through the Universal Service Fund (USF), yet another vote-buying perk given by our Congress to "assure" its members even greater perpetuity (see: Universal Service Fund). If you are not indigent but merely indignant and want to learn more, please visit the Assurance Wireless Website. Here is a quote from this website regarding Massachusetts residents with an alphabet soup of qualifying programs:

You may qualify for Assurance Wireless if you participate in any of the following government programs: 1) MassHealth or Medicaid Food Stamps/SNAP; 2) Supplemental Security Income (SSI); 3) Low- Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP); 4) Emergency Aid to the Elderly, Disabled and Children (EAEDC); 5) Transitional Aid to Families with Dependent Children (TAFDC) [and for] Individuals or Families Living in Tribal Lands Only: 6) Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) General Assistance Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); 7) Head Start Program [HSP] (under income qualifying eligibility provision only); [and finally] 8) National School Lunch Program [NSLP] (free meals program only)

It would be easy for one to pay over $35 per month ($420 per year) for such a cellphone service. Is there no end to largess that is lavished upon those who have found their way back into our welfare system? Apparently, Bill Clinton, his Presidential successors, and our 535 members of Congress have found even more creative ways to "fix welfare" and "not end welfare as we know it."

Masking Things

2012-01-09T21:02:00.000-08:00

In late October, 2009 the White House held an extravagant Halloween ball which featured a Tim Burton Alice in Wonderland Tea Party ... full of famous Hollywood characters (see: New York Post Article). This party was then purposefully masked from the American public's view. To me, it wasn't such a big deal that the Obama's treated their girls to such a Cecil B. DeMille production. But what was such a big deal was that the American press actively participated in the suppression of the news of this bash at the White House's request ... and it's taken this long to be revealed.

Now, I am extremely curious ... what other friendly cover-up conspiracies has our media participated in during the Obama's reign in office?

The Granite State

2012-01-09T08:38:00.000-08:00

Arnie Arnesen, a failed political hack from the Granite State, New Hampshire, (see: Wikipedia Entry) was just on talk radio here in Boston this morning ... and she said that, if students in New Hampshire weren't on their winter break, Ron Paul would do much better in tomorrow's Republican primary. I found this a curious statement, so I went to Google and only found Colby-Sawyer to be a New Hampshire college that might still be on winter break. There could be a few others, but the scheduling information on many of the other New Hampshire colleges is a little sparse on the Internet.

But this brings me back to that old bone I like to chew on ... why do students, who don't really live where they go to college, get to cast their ballots there (see: Representation without Taxation)? They don't pay taxes there ... even the colleges they attend do not pay taxes there. (And, besides I strongly suspect that many of them also absentee-vote in their home-town elections.) Doesn't this liberal push-through rule amount to representation without taxation? I truly believe that it does. If these students actually live year-round in or around their college town and pay taxes there, then I have no problem with their also voting there. But, if not, then they should only be allowed to cast absentee ballots in their real home towns. Or maybe we should hold national elections in mid-summer?

I realize that I am a hard-hearted martinet ... but big-D democracy does require a little big-D discipline.

Rolls of Fat

2012-01-07T07:37:00.000-08:00

China is now leading the world in the purchase of Rolls Royces ... surpassing the United States for the first time (see Wall Street Journal Story). Perhaps the Occupiers should pitch their tents in Tiananmen Square since this clearly is where the 1%-ers now reside?

(Tip o' the hat to Terry.)