Oh, you gullible democrat supporters.

Before the election democrats promised they were going to work “tirelessly” and “relentlessly” to lower costs and improve affordability.  Van Jones told us how they whispered “affordability” in your ears day after day after day. You’ve been had. They have little interest in affordability. They never have. They’ve never reduced costs. Everything they do costs taxpayers more. Today is no different.

Their real goals are quite different. What they have in mind is a modern-day political Sherman’s March to the Sea. A GOP slash and burn operation. I’ve said it repeatedly and for a long time- the goal is a one-party state forever. They plan to end democracy in the name of democracy. They intend to replace what they consider to be our oligarchs with their own true oligarchs. So let’s lay out the who and what. Here’s a list of who is planning what. These are the self-declared goals

• Hegseth impeachment / Pentagon accountability
  Hakeem Jeffries: “Hard yes” on the Massie resolution; “Pete Hegseth has got to go.”
  Yassamin Ansari: Filed six articles of impeachment in April; “HELL YES” on the resolution; people “down the chain at the Pentagon who carried out these orders need to be investigated.” (Ansari is Iran’s representative in the US along with Hamawy)
• War powers resolutions, ending the Iran conflict, and reorienting U.S. policy toward Iran
  Hakeem Jeffries & Chuck Schumer: Publicly listed ending the war as a top priority. Then what?
  Gregory Meeks (incoming HFAC Chair): Will introduce a joint resolution on day one and use the power of the purse. For what?
  Tim Kaine, Chris Van Hollen, Michael Bennet, Ro Khanna: Pushing no-funding-without-authorization language in appropriations.
  Yassamin Ansari: Consistent aggressive voice on unauthorized war and civilian casualties. Highly concerned with Iran’s welfare.
  Adam Hamawy (NJ-12, incoming): In a CNN interview repeatedly refused to call Iran an “adversary.” Said “We’re making adversaries when we should be making friends,” equated decades of Iranian “Death to America” rhetoric with U.S. statements, and when told Iran has killed many Americans replied “And we’ve killed a lot of them as well.” Advocates diplomacy modeled on the Obama approach; also calls for ending U.S. military aid to Israel. (Former Army combat surgeon who served in Iraq.)⁠NY Post
• Voting rights legislation (John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act)
  Terri Sewell: Lead sponsor; announced a revised version this week to address recent Supreme Court decisions. (Pack the Court)
• Congressional stock-trading ban
  Hakeem Jeffries: Pledged it as one of the first items Democrats will move once in control. (Should start with Ro Khanna)
• ICE / immigration enforcement accountability (oversight to abolition)
  Jamie Raskin (incoming Judiciary Chair): Congress will use “every tool” to investigate ICE; the agency must “start answering to the American people.” Translation: We’re going to run amuck
  Robert Garcia (incoming Oversight Chair): “Lawyer up”; broad probes of alleged DHS/ICE abuses.
  Bennie Thompson (incoming Homeland Security Chair): Subpoenas and probes into the Alex Pretti and Renee Good killings; document preservation; body-camera accountability. It’s then likely he’ll destroy the evidence as he did with Jan 6 files.
  Ayanna Pressley and other progressives: Abolish and fully defund ICE. Open the borders!
• Broader Trump-administration investigations
  Jamie Raskin & Robert Garcia: Early subpoenas on systemic corruption (Epstein files, pardons, DOGE, Trump family business ties, etc.); restoring the “rule of law.” Open to further impeachment proceedings if the facts support them. Translation: We will be after every Trump supporter.

These are the concrete, on-record goals declared after Election Day. “Affordability” was the campaign messaging. What the governing agenda leadership and the progressive wing have actually staked out is undoing what has been done and the politics of personal destruction. Upon this democrats will be working “tirelessly and “relentlessly.”

Everything but affordability.

Taylor Frazier McCollum, a local Maryland resident and activist, who gathered over 25,000 signatures on a petition that helped impose local moratoriums, stalling a planned $5 billion AI data center on the vacant former Landover Mall site in Prince George’s County, which has sat empty since 2002.

The activist cited concerns over water pollution, diesel generators, and health impacts like asthma in the nearby predominantly Black community; her petition gained momentum after a collaboration with the Party for Socialism and Liberation amplified it via an Instagram video.

The blocked project was projected to bring significant jobs and ~$53.5 million in annual tax revenue to a county facing budget shortfalls,

JUST IN: Maryland activist helps block a $5B AI data center planned for the site of an abandoned shopping mall that closed 24 years ago, after gathering over 25,000 signatures. https://t.co/yFK43jI6XL

— Polymarket (@Polymarket) November 9, 2026

The woman who blocked the project told Fox the $5B investment would only benefit the employees of the data center, advocating for the site to be turned into an indoor trampoline park instead.

Everyone is hailiing her as a new Margaret Mead or Erin Brockovich. There’s just one problem.

Fun fact: The woman pictured here credited the viral success of her campaign to the Party for Socialism and Liberation, a China proxy organization operating here in the United States. PSL is the political arm of the Shanghai-based Neville Roy Singham, an avowed Marxist multimillionaire who has bankrolled anti-American, pro-CCP nonprofits to the tune of $278 million.

Singham’s political foot soldiers have been boots on the ground in dozens of anti-data center fights across the country. But striking down the $5 billion data center campus in Landover, MD, was by far their biggest scalp.

In the ongoing campaign against American AI, cui bono?

More than anyone, it’s our chief political adversary.

And this is not a one off

This campus was just one of many.

The CCP-aligned PSL successfully blocked or delayed $24 billion in data center investment here in the US.

The nonprofit/activist ecosystem is massive vector for foreign influence.

Read our full report here:
https://t.co/fMk5xTjcbK https://t.co/uj0P4Z1Prz

— Sam Lyman (@SamLyman33) November 10, 2026

This is war. China is spreading this kind of propaganda in a determined to curtail the development of AI and data centers in the US and the dimmest lights among us are all too willing to comply. This particular genius asserts that money is a “made-up concept.”

Maryland activist who blocked a $5 billion data center from coming to her cash-strapped county says “money is a made-up concept.” https://t.co/PGFHwqKWYp

— Brecca Stoll (@breccastoll) November 12, 2026

And she’s quote proud that she killed a lot of high paying jobs for the community.

One might opine that those vociferously objecting to data centers – think DSA types – are beneficiaries of CCP largesse.

Neville Roy Singham needs to be sanctioned, and arguably receive something much harsher.

More about this here.

democrats (and at least one Republican) have a disease. It’s called “impeachment fever.” When it strikes, a person is consumed with irrational hate and the feverish need to impeach every Republican in sight. The other day as an appetizer they tried to ram through the snap impeachment of Pete Hegseth, articles filed by Thomas Massie. It was struck down on a procedural act.  They will do it again and come January, are likely to succeed. But let’s have a look at the Articles

• Article I: Starting the Iran war without authorization
• Article II: Defying congressional directives to end hostilities
• Article III: Violating the War Powers Resolution statutory deadlines
• Article IV: Disregarding laws and policies designed to minimize civilian casualties
• Article V: Carrying out extrajudicial killings through maritime strikes
• Article VI: Retaliating against Sen. Mark Kelly
• Article VII: Launching an unauthorized act of war to capture Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro
• Article VIII: Directing unauthorized military strikes in Yemen

Now for a history of precedents lesson regarding each of the Articles:

Article I. President Barack Obama ordered the 2011 U.S. military intervention in Libya without prior or subsequent authorization from Congress.

Article II. See#1

Article III. When the operation passed the 60-day deadline set by the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the administration did not seek congressional approval or withdraw.

Article IV. On August 29, 2021, U.S. drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan a Biden drone strike killed an innocent family of ten, including children. No disciplinary action was taken.

Article V. Obama killed four Americans extra-judicially in drone strikes.

Article VI. Nonsensical. Obama used the IRS to target Trump donors. Biden targeted PTA moms and Catholic churches. Both were impeachable. Obama and Holder lost 2,000 automatic weapons to Mexican cartels.

Article VII.  All I’ve got to say here is “We came, we saw, He died”

Article VIII. Unauthorized strikes? Obama was a busy boy

### 1. Operations with Zero Congressional Authorization
Congress never authorized military action in these operations, and the administration did not claim coverage under existing war resolutions:

* **Libya (2011 Intervention):** **~7,700+** precision-guided bombs and missiles dropped by NATO/U.S. coalition forces (including over 110 U.S. Tomahawk cruise missiles fired during initial strikes).
* **Libya (2016 Anti-ISIS Campaign):** **~500** airstrikes/munitions dropped in and around Sirte.

—

### 2. Operations Without Specific or New Congressional Authorization
President Obama never sought or received a dedicated Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) for these operations. Instead, executive branch lawyers relied on a broad reinterpretation of the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs:

* **Syria (2014–2016):** **~20,000 to 25,000+** bombs and missiles dropped during the anti-ISIS campaign. *(President Obama formally requested an AUMF for Syria in 2015, but Congress never passed one.)*
* **Iraq (2014–2016 Return):** **~25,000 to 30,000+** bombs and missiles dropped against ISIS following the U.S. military’s re-entry into Iraq.
* **Pakistan (2009–2016):** **~372 covert drone strikes** (an estimated 800 to 1,000+ Hellfire missiles and munitions).
* **Yemen (2009–2016):** **~150 to 185** drone strikes, cruise missile strikes, and naval bombardments targeting AQAP.
* **Somalia (2009–2016):** **~35 to 40** airstrikes and drone strikes targeting al-Shabaab.

—

Estimated Total
* **Total munitions dropped without a country-specific congressional vote:** Approximately **55,000 to 65,000+** bombs, missiles, and precision-guided munitions.

.

All of these were impeachable offenses for Obama and Biden if they are offenses for Hegseth. But there’s more. Here is the history of democrat impeachment. None resulted in impeachment.

Impeached Democrats in U.S. History

• Bill Clinton (1998): The House Judiciary Committee held extensive formal hearings, reviewed the multi-volume report from Independent Counsel Ken Starr, and heard live testimony from Starr and constitutional scholars before drafting and voting on articles of impeachment.
• Andrew Johnson (1868): Johnson was a lifelong Democrat who had run on Abraham Lincoln’s 1864 “National Union” ticket. Prior to his impeachment for violating the Tenure of Office Act, the House Judiciary Committee and a Select Committee spent over a year conducting formal investigations and taking testimony.
• Alejandro Mayorkas (2024): Prior to the House vote to impeach the Secretary of Homeland Security, the House Homeland Security Committee held a series of formal hearings and produced committee reports in January 2024.
• Democratic-Appointed Federal Judges: Several judges appointed by Democratic presidents have been impeached over the years—such as Harry Claiborne (1986), Alcee Hastings (1988), Walter Nixon (1989), and Thomas Porteous (2010). In every case, the House Judiciary Committee or a dedicated task force held evidentiary hearings, examined witness testimony, and produced detailed investigative reports before any full House floor vote occurred.

None were impeached without extensive hearings. Only one impeachment in history was a snap impeachment without regard to any due process.

The Hegseth impeachment would have been the second.

There are essentially no guardrails against an illegitimate or unfair impeachment. It remains out of the reach of the Judiciary. But it is a political action, not a criminal one. Impeachment does not end in removal from office. Removal requires a conviction in the Senate, which is unlikely.

Thus, impeachment fever causes impulsive actions which apparently offer significant sexual gratification.

Of course, there are issues of fairness. As I said, no democrat has ever been impeached without extensive hearings. In the case, Massie and democrats wanted the subject murdered by the lynch mob before the exculpatory precedents could be introduced.

Had they been introduced, the country would have seen how unfair and hypocritically vile this kabuki theater has been.

Fairness is not on the democrat menu and impeachment has been so abused that it’s become just another day at the DNC office.

The American Founders were not advocates of pure democracy. They were students of history, and history taught them a hard lesson: majorities can be just as dangerous as kings.

The Constitution was designed around a simple but profound assumption: power is dangerous.

Not Republican power. Not Democratic power. Not executive power, legislative power, or judicial power alone.

Power.

That is why the Founders constructed a system deliberately filled with friction, delays, competing interests, and overlapping authorities. They wanted government to be difficult. They wanted political movements to struggle before changing fundamental aspects of the country. They feared concentrated power more than inefficiency.

The Founders’ Solution

The Constitution employs multiple layers of checks and balances:

• A bicameral legislature
• A separately elected President
• An independent judiciary
• Federalism
• State sovereignty
• Constitutional rights beyond majority control
• Difficult amendment procedures

James Madison understood that liberty could not depend on the character of those in power.

As he argued, ambition must counteract ambition.

The point was not to find virtuous rulers. The point was to create institutions that would restrain rulers whether they were virtuous or not.

The Modern Assault on Constitutional Friction

Today, however, there is a growing movement on the political left that views many of these constitutional safeguards not as protections but as obstacles.

The Electoral College is attacked.

The Senate is attacked.

The filibuster is attacked.

The Supreme Court is attacked.

Federalism is attacked.

In some circles, even the legitimacy of the Constitution itself is questioned.

Organizations such as the Democratic Socialists of America openly advocate sweeping structural changes to American institutions, including abolishing the Senate and transforming the present constitutional order. [program.dsausa.org], [en.wikipedia.org]

These proposals are often presented as democratic reforms.

But there is an important question that rarely receives adequate attention:

What institutions remain to restrain power after all these safeguards are removed?

The Problem With Centralized Authority

Advocates of institutional reform often argue that they are attempting to make government more responsive to popular will.

That sounds appealing.

The problem is that history rarely stops there.

When barriers to power are removed, power does not disappear.

It concentrates.

The Senate is weakened.

The judiciary is reshaped.

The Presidency becomes subordinate to commissions, councils, or boards.

Authority migrates from elected officials to permanent institutions.

And then comes the most important question of all:

Who controls those institutions?

If a President becomes subordinate to a governing board, who selects the members of that board?

Who removes them?

Who oversees them?

Who audits them?

Who holds them accountable?

More importantly:

Who prevents a single political faction from eventually dominating the board itself?

History suggests that once true power resides in an unelected institution, political competition shifts toward controlling that institution.

Eventually one faction succeeds.

Then the board governs.

Elected officials become administrators of decisions made elsewhere.

Citizens still vote, but the actual centers of power become increasingly insulated from the electorate.

The Historical Pattern

This is not a theoretical concern.

History is filled with examples of political systems that began with promises of popular empowerment and ended with concentrated authority.

The path is often remarkably similar:

1. Existing constitutional constraints are portrayed as obstacles.
2. Power is consolidated to solve urgent problems.
3. Opposition is marginalized.
4. Independent institutions are weakened.
5. Elections continue but become less meaningful.
6. Real authority becomes concentrated in a small ruling class.

Eventually, the public discovers that removing constraints on power did not eliminate power.

It merely relocated it.

And concentrated power has a remarkable tendency to concentrate even further.

The Ultimate Safeguard: Elections

Defenders of centralized authority often respond that elections remain the ultimate check.

But that merely pushes the question one step further.

Who controls the elections?

Who writes the rules?

Who counts the votes?

Who certifies the results?

Who adjudicates disputes?

Who oversees those institutions?

Who ensures that the people counting votes are not beholden to the people benefiting from the count?

If every safeguard ultimately answers to the same political faction, then the safeguards cease to be safeguards.

A republic survives because there are independent centers of power capable of resisting one another.

When all meaningful institutions answer to a single coalition, constitutional restraints exist largely on paper.

Why the Founders Distrusted Pure Democracy

This is why the Founders intentionally rejected pure democracy.

They understood something many modern reformers seem to forget:

The purpose of constitutional government is not to make government efficient.

The purpose is to preserve liberty.

The Constitution was designed to slow political movements.

To frustrate political ambitions.

To force compromise.

To prevent temporary majorities from imposing permanent changes.

To protect minorities from majorities.

To disperse power across competing institutions.

In short, it was designed to make tyranny difficult.

The Real Debate

The central political question of our time is not whether the left or the right will govern.

Elections answer that question.

The greater question is whether the constitutional framework that restrains those who govern will survive intact.

The Founders understood that freedom does not depend upon electing the right people.

It depends upon ensuring that no person, party, movement, institution, board, committee, or bureaucracy can accumulate enough power to rule without restraint.

The Constitution was designed to frustrate ambition, slow political passions, and prevent temporary majorities from becoming permanent masters.

Those who view its checks and balances as obstacles misunderstand their purpose.

The obstacles are the protection.

Liberty survives not because government acts quickly, but because power moves slowly.

The moment Americans decide constitutional restraints are no longer necessary because their side is in charge is the moment they begin trading self-government for something else.

History offers many examples of nations that made that trade.

Many did so believing they were creating a fairer, more efficient, more democratic society.

Instead, they discovered that when power is centralized, it eventually falls into the hands of those most capable of wielding it.

The American experiment was designed to prevent that outcome.

The Constitution was never intended for rulers we trust.

It was intended for rulers we do not.

That is why power is divided.

That is why government is slow.

That is why the system frustrates political movements of every stripe.

And that is why preserving those restraints remains the first duty of anyone who wishes to preserve the Republic itself.

democrats are convinced that following the midterm election they have been given a mandate to kill the Republican party and its members, and anyone who even thinks of working with or for Republicans. Let’s have a look. Slotkin, Garcia, Raskin, Pressley, Ramirez, Warnock and Warren all clamor to join the pantheon of notorious persecutors like Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin, Idi Amin and Saddam Hussein.

Hakeem Jeffries: Veiled threats

He’s after Trump for the “cost of corruption” without ever saying what that is.

Raphael Warnock: Intimidation

Unless RFK Jr. is interested in spending the next two years in front of Congressional committees, he should go ahead and resign now.

Ayanna Pressley: Crimes against humanity

Ayanna Pressley wants Republicans held accountable for “crimes against humanity.” “Starving, hungry children. Denying people essential health care. The list is long.” This was after listing other punishable offenses such as “Black women pushed out of the workforce,” tariffs and the unemployment rate. In other words: It doesn’t matter what the grievances are, Democrats want them contorted into prosecutable crimes. Affordability, everyone!

Elizabeth Warren: “cheaters”

Lizzy Warren says if you’ve been “cheating” Americans, get ready for “serious investigations.” She’s asked who specifically she’s talking about. “Anyone who’s been cheating. That’s what investigations are all about.” Translation: We have no idea if any crimes have been committed by our list of targets, but we’ll be digging hard to try to find some. (And if we can’t find any, we’ll just invent some.)

Lizzie has a net worth of about $12 million. At least $3 million derives from “books” which could be construed as a cheater’s way to funnel money to politicians.

Jamie Raskin: destroy any company that cooperated with Trump

Jamie Raskin promises Democrats will be going after corporations and law firms that “collaborated,” “capitulated” and “surrendered” to Trump. Translation: We will try to destroy any company or firm that dared to work with the Trump administration. Examples must be made for defying the will of the Democrat party. It was all about healthcare and affordability, you guys.

In fact, they’ve been working on a plan for some time now

“Senior congressional Democrats have been studying a 181-page dossier that identifies hundreds of executives and companies for them to investigate.”

…

“Including the biggest tech giants, artificial intelligence labs, natural gas firms, private prisons and nursing home operators, among dozens of others.”

Susan Rice goes even farther

Susan Rice offers a taste of what’s coming should the left retake power — promises Democrats will punish corporations and other institutions who have “taken a knee to Trump.” “It’s not going to end well for them.” “If these corporations think that the Democrats, when they come back in power, are going to play by the old rules…they’ve got another thing coming.” “There will be an accountability agenda.” “This is not going to be an instance of forgive and forget.”

She’s no stranger to lies and deception. You know, by the book.

.

Gene Wu wants Elon Musk’s ass for er, something

TX congressman Gene Wu says the new Democrat majority in Texas wants Elon Musk investigated and prosecuted: “The word is PROSECUTE.” “Every single sacred rule we have, he has found some way to break it or bend it. And we’re tired of it.” “Everywhere that Elon Musk goes in Texas, whether it’s SpaceX, whether it’s X AI, whatever it is, there is controversy and illegality that follows it everywhere.” What illegality? Of course Wu doesn’t say. That’s because the ‘crime’ Elon committed is funding Republican campaigns in Texas. That’s what they believe deserves punishment.

Scott Galloway wants Elon Musk executed

“We lined up the Rosenbergs against a wall. This is a traitor to the West, and he should be held to the same standards as every other traitor in the West.”

But I just love Robert Garcia, the gay and petty illegal alien who was somehow granted amnesty. He’s been jabbering non-stop since November 3rd. He proved himself to be a complete idiot, everything you’d expect from an illiterate illegal from Peru.

Totally ignorant of history, he complained about Todd Blanche defending Trump:

Todd Blanche was Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, and as Attorney General of the United States, he’s still acting like it. Blanche should be defending the Constitution, not threatening our Committee for doing our jobs. We will not be intimidated.

Blanche pointed out that it’s Constitutional, but more importantly the petty Garcia missed an important history precedent from then AG Eric Holder:

“I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done.  I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. ”

He wasn’t going to stop there. No sir. He went on to make a threat.

.

Oversight Democrats are ready to take on the crooks, the con men, and the Trump crime family. Lawyer up. https://t.co/Bat1pWfoEB

— Congressman Robert Garcia (@RepRobertGarcia) November 6, 2026

Garcia is going to learn something the hard way- that was illegal.

.

NEW: Alan Dershowitz says Incoming Dem House Oversight Chair Robert Garcia’s “LAWYER UP” threat is “ILLEGAL”

“If they are challenged in Court, the Chairman’s statement will be OBVIOUS EVIDENCE of a motivation by Democrats to get Republicans!”

Garcia pledged before the Midterms that he would pursue a retribution agenda if Democrats regained power.

Immediately after they won, he made it clear it was not just a campaign promise.

Garcia’s brazenness may end up being the downfall of his lawfare.

— Jason Cohen (@JasonJournoDC) November 5, 2026

.

Garcia was twice asked what crimes were committed and it dropped to “possibly illegal”

.

NO CRIME: Robert Garcia told Stephen Miller to “LAWYER UP” and then couldn’t name a single crime on live TV.

Dana Bash asked him TWICE.

First answer: a long rant about immigration policy.
Second answer: “Possibly illegal.”

That’s it. That’s the whole case.

Enforcing immigration law isn’t a crime. It’s what Americans voted for in 2024.

This was never oversight. It’s a fishing expedition.

— Gunther Eagleman (@GuntherEagleman) November 8, 2026

John Yoo just pointed out that Congress cannot prosecute anyone and Presidential privilege covers Presidential aides as well.

.

The day after his threat, karma paid Garcia a visit

Garcia stated as fact that billionaire Leon Black and others “provided him the means to create one of the largest sex trafficking rings in modern history.” He amplified a claim that Black’s money “was used to traffic women and children.” Black has never been charged with a crime. The civil cases against him collapsed… one accuser and her lawyer were sanctioned by a federal judge for lying, and the case was dismissed with prejudice and without settlement. Another accuser dropped her suit with prejudice. Black won against a third. On November 4, the day after the election, Black sued Garcia for defamation in federal court in Manhattan, seeking $7.25 million.

Now Garcia has to lawyer up.

BTW, Here’s Garcia suggesting himself to be a child predator

..

when they go low this is me https://t.co/UYr4vlreKw

— Robert Garcia (@RobertGarcia) November 7, 2026

.

Finally, we have Elyssa Slotkin. She threatened outright to ruin anyone who considered working for or with Republicans. She expressed the desire for “signature cases”, kids to be made an example of:

“I want young people coming out of school to say, ‘Should I go work for the Trump administration? Like, that sounds fun…’ I want them to be like, ‘Lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don’t want. And so let me avoid participating in that.’ I want that deterrence message sent.”

.

Exhibit A:

Michigan Democrat U.S. Senator Elissa Slotkin said she wants to persecute political enemies to deter their young supporters from public service. https://t.co/ZrYxQjE8TV

— Mike Davis (@mrddmia) November 8, 2026

This is lawfare on a grand scale and its intent is the eradication of the Republican party and the establishment of a one-party state. That will lead to a totalitarian state and ultimately a dictatorship.

This is all in the interest of improving affordability in the country.

I might have been wrong about Islam. There are potential advantages. An Islamic takeover of this country would invariably result in the same outcome it has everywhere else. The subjugation of women.

Think of the possibilities. Think of Hillary Clinton in a niqab. What better way to deal with the plague of white liberal women than to shut them all up? History has shown us the fate of women in Islamic nations.

This hits hard

Coming to a Europe, North America & Australia near you https://t.co/YyUfRq5TZK

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) November 6, 2026

Remember Maura Healey surrounded by women joyous at the thought of aborting babies at birth? Imagine this instead:

There is already evidence of this trending in America. In the Islamic enclaves of Dearborn and Hamtramck Michigan there are no women serving in governmental positions.

These are women in Dearborn today

How the hell can people see what’s going on in Dearborn and still vote for Abdul El-Sayed?

All of Michigan will become Dearborn. https://t.co/E7EV7KW69O

— Dr. Maalouf ‏ (@realMaalouf) August 5, 2026

Here’s a picture of Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan I’d love to see

Islamism knows how to handle those radical women

Two leftist Marxist students celebrating the Islamic Revolution in Tehran, 1979.

Sahar Mohammadi (left) and Maryam Rafiei (right).

Maryam Rafiei was later executed by the same regime in the 1988 prison massacres, along with thousands of other leftist political activists.
The revolution ate its own.

They hated the Shah of Iran so much that they cheered Khomeini’s arrival, convinced the revolution would bring freedom and modernity.
Reminds you of anything today?

— Sana Ebrahimi Ledene (@SanaELedene) November 4, 2026

Maybe Islamism isn’t all bad.

.

“Michigan is the capital of Arab America.”

Like the sound of that? It’s only the beginning.  Back in August, I wrote 

It’s no secret that Abdulrahman El-Sayed has his eyes on the Presidency to follow his possible election to the US Senate.

Let me put down a premise. Those of you who voted for him are stupid. Gullible and stupid. El Sayed is not who he wants you to believe he is. You’ve been used. You’re pawns in a large game. What did he promise you?

• Abolish ICE
• Medicare for All
• Money out of politics
• Money in your pocket

His money quote is this:

“Winning a single U.S. Senate seat was never the goal. The goal is to use that seat to transform our politics. Because it’s high past time that we get money out of politics. Put money in your pocket. Pass Medicare for All.”

The first two sentences are honest. The rest are lies. But let’s go over those first two sentences again

“Winning a single U.S. Senate seat was never the goal. The goal is to use that seat to transform our politics.”

This means a concerted effort to insert more and more America hating children like Darializa Chevalier into office. He will need money to do that.

The fools at the Washington Post characterized his words this way

“The Core Goal: Removing Money’s Influence

El‑Sayed identified eradicating the influence of money in American politics as his first mission.”

This is patently stupid and false.

El Sayed just formed his own PAC- the “Habibi PAC.” The “take money out of politics” messiah has formed a dark money super PAC. Ostensibly the intent is to fund Democratic allies, but those “allies” will be Islamo-Communists only.

And he means to purge his enemies. His former security chief Jordan Domingue says this:

“One of his main goals if he won was revenge. If you are a state rep who even respectfully endorsed his primary opponents, this dark money super Pac is coming for you. If you endorsed him out of fear or strategic planning and you’re not a leftist, this dark money super PAC is coming for you. Slotkin you’re first.”

He has a new transition director to help in that direction:

NEW:

This is Abdul El-Sayed’s first hire as Senator-elect

A former professor on “Islamophobia” who claims Zionists are “controlling” American politics.

I’m starting to think he’s not all about “money in your pockets, Medicare for All.”

https://t.co/jOL9j6oPM3 https://t.co/eT9tlxOQ1M

— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) November 6, 2026

This is a good time to reintroduce you to the term “Taqiyya.” This is an Islamic tradition allowing Muslims to lie in furtherance of their true goals.

Stupid democrats were so power-hungry that they’re willing to commit political suicide. Chuck Schumer deposited $30 million of PAC money into El Sayed’s campaign and in return El Sayed wants Chris Van Hollen as Senate majority leader. Several of the new democrat Communists are not going to support Schumer., including Troy Jackson, Peggy Flanagan, Juliana Stratton and Adam Hamilton

El Sayed declared Michigan to be the capitol of the new caliphate.

Weird-like a conquering emperor, newly elected Senator El-Sayed declares Michigan, “Arab Capitol of America”. I mean, it’s almost as if…oh never mind. Carry on

El Sayed is a liar of epic proportions. The Trojan Senator.  I warned of this

Abdul El-Sayed may have been born in the US, but he is no American. He is too thick with subversives and Islamists, promoted anti-government violence and is generally a smartass jerk who cannot hide his terrorist sympathies. He will put the Quran above the Constitution as Islam is both a government and a religion. He is a closet jihadist.

He must not be allowed in Federal government.

It’s now too later for that. The camel has his nose in the tent.

Money out of politics? El Sayed is in the process of putting major money into politics.

Money in your pocket? That was just a line of bullshit to hook the feeble minded.

Medicare for All? That was just a shiny object to get attention. El Sayed has said that “Politics is the alchemy of turning attention into power. Well, he’s gotten their attention. Paying for MfA would require alchemy on a grand scale.

He has called Trump “an unserious fool.” Anyone supporting El Sayed is a serious fool.

Tuesday was an effing bloodbath.  Texas, of all places, basically flipped from blood red to sky blue. They elected to the Senate a dude who has a favorite drag queen!  But it wasn’t just Texas.  Donalds barely won his Governor race in the reddest state in the union. Georgia picked a woman for Governor who had to quit her race for mayor because she couldn’t win. And Michigan elected an Islamist to the Senate.  Not to mention losing over 40 seats in the House and probably 9 in the Senate.

This is, any way you look at it, a disaster of epic proportions.  Not necessarily historic though.  Obama lost 63 seats in the House in 2010 and 9 in the Senate in 2014.  And overall Grover Cleveland lost 125 seats in the House in 1894 and Ike lost 13 in the Senate in 1958. So, not necessarily historic, but ungodly bad for certain.

Everyone has their two cents about why this happened.  Mine is pretty simple.  The Republicans betrayed their voters. They were given control of the White House, Senate & House, with an actual mandate: 1) Secure our borders and deport tens of millions of illegals.  2) Secure our elections. 3) Cut spending. 4) Don’t fuck up the economy.

Sadly, the GOP clowns managed to blow all four, or at least in the case of the border and the economy, they lost the messaging.

On the first point, while Trump most certainly has been a vast improvement on Biden, the reality is, he allowed treasonous judges to hamstring him almost every step of the way.  And Congress, which has complete control over the lower courts, did nothing to help him. Nothing.

On the second point, Thune was nothing short of a disaster. At first he claimed he couldn’t get the SAVE America Act past the filibuster, but then said even if he could, he wouldn’t have had the votes to pass it. That’s the excuse of a manager, not a leader. Can you imagine Pelosi not getting a bill that 85% of Americans wanted passed because of a few recalcitrant Members?  No chance.  Leadership has power and she would have used it… and she did, often. Thune was never a leader, he never inspired anyone… except animosity from people like me who think he’s a traitor. Had he accomplished that one task, we wouldn’t be having this conversation.  But he didn’t and we are.

On the third point, Trump, Thune and Johnson basically played go along to get along. They cut virtually nothing. DOGE handed them hundreds of billions of fraud they could have cut, but they did practically nothing and Nick Shirley, among others, showed them billions in grift and they’ve done nothing. All in all, they not only didn’t cut spending, they increased it and added $3 trillion to the national debt in less than two years. Trump and virtually every Republican on Capitol Hill just went along as if spending growth was some otherworldly force that has a life of its own and they have no control over.

On the last point, the reality is the economy isn’t nearly as bad as the media tells people.  The one place it is, is gasoline prices. Gas prices are almost as much of a third rail in American politics as Social Security. No other item do Americans pay so close attention to. Why?  Because no other consumer item in the American economy has 140,000 signs advertising its price right in front of us, every single day. And we drive more and use more gas, more frequently than anyone in the world.  Because of all that, gas prices have a psychological effect on Americans that no other product does.  And today gas prices are 30% higher than they were two years ago. Inflation sitting at 3.7% is not great, but it’s not historically bad either. Combine that with tepid GDP figures and slightly higher unemployment rates and the economy’s not great, but it’s not bloodbath terrible. But the media told us it was.

The reality is that Americans handed the GOP a mandate two years ago and they squandered it. Americans didn’t want a lot, but what they did want was pretty clear, and the GOP decided that they would rather muddle through rather than actually lead.  That includes, Speaker Johnson, Leader Thune, and sadly, President Trump.  Even Iran would not have been an issue, despite Trump’s No new wars pledge had it been swift and eliminated the leadership and the Revolutionary Guard.  But it wasn’t and it didn’t, and Americans are paying the price for it, literally. And so too did the Republicans.

The question is, what’s next?  We know the Democrats are going to go on an impeachment and contempt joyride.  We can’t worry about that.

The only question that matters right now is, what will Trump do? Will he spend the next two years saying the bloodbath wasn’t his fault and play footsies with the Democrats, or will he swallow his pride and do what’s right for America?  Sadly my guess is the former, but if he decides that his legacy should be that of the man who saves the Republic rather than the guy who built a new ballroom, he needs to watch Tombstone and take a cue from Kurt Russel “Tell ‘em I’m coming, and I’m bringing Hell with me.”

• Finish the Iran war. Eliminate the IRGC and eliminate Iran’s ability to strike America or her allies, either directly or through proxies. (An incidental regime change would be a bonus.)
• Ramp up dramatically the deportations of illegals. He needs to ignore the treasonous federal judges who have been handcuffing his every move. Today federal judges act as if they have jurisdiction over every single element of American life. They don’t, and there’s nothing in the Constitution that gives it to them. Trump should not allow them to exercise the Executive powers they assert they have. Let Congress try and do something about it.
• Resurrect DOGE and use presidential prerogative to defund every fraudulent program out there.
• Go to the mattresses with Congress over government spending, particularly redistribution programs that are so rife with fraud. Refuse to sign anything that adds a single penny to the deficit. Shut the government down and use his Article II, Section 3 powers to Congress in Washington until they come up with something he will sign. No vacation. No holidays. No trips home. Every single day if necessary.
• Finally, and most importantly, build a Republican party that will actually govern as America First after 2028. Endorse candidates because they’re conservative, not because they kiss his ass. Endorse candidates because they can be counted on to do what he promised to do and which got him elected in the first place.

The reality is, no one is coming to save America. It’s up to patriots to fix what the GOP establishment effed up. Primary every RINO in Congress. Nominate patriots who love small government, individual freedom, Christianity, Capitalism, and, most of all, America. If someone doesn’t check off every one of those boxes, keep moving until you find someone who does.  The establishment did this to themselves.  But sadly they did it to us as well. It’s up to us to fix it. That is the only way.

Welcome back to Day 656 of America’s liberation from the Biden*/Harris occupation! Let’s look at what the Democrats’ newsletter had to say in the days leading up to, and following the election!

Stocks tumble, erasing post-midterm gains as markets weigh future of AI build-out

“Future of AI”. Or maybe it’s more to do with the Marxists scoring a massive electoral victory?

D.C. elected its first democratic socialist mayor. What does it mean for the city?

The irony is too thick.

Trump staff Halloween party had ‘Mount Trumpmore’ display, ‘DEI’ gravestone

I don’t think The Compost realizes how awesome this sounds to half of the country

ACA premiums are going up again. See what it means for you.

It means that if you voted Democrat and believe their blather about “affordability” then you’re an idiot.

The sleeper issue that could decide the U.S. Senate race in Texas

They claim it’s Paxton’s “corruption”, aka the lawfare that the Texas Vichy Republicans waged against Paxton. I got an unsolicited email blast a few days ago on this topic, and of course I hot “Reply to All”:

“Thank you for sending this Alex. You have persuaded me to abandon my values to vote for a barely closeted vegan Satanist twerp who’s going to win Texas without the black vote.
Just curious, which Bush family member do you work with?”

From last year:

Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension reverberates beyond late-night TV

Sadly, that unfunny lying twerp is still on the air for now.

Trump cabinet secretaries conspired to violate Constitution, judge says

Sorry, but foreign filth does not have a Constitutional right to spew how much they hate America and want it destroyed. That right is reserved for registered Democrat Americans.

Homeland Security is targeting Americans with this secretive legal weapon

I’m actually with The Compost on this. Now I’d like their thoughts on the treatment of the January 6th Reichstag Fire victims.

Have a great week!

I’m not a right-wing provocateur. I’m a journalist. And I’m defending your 1st amendment rights at @ABC as much as mine.

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) October 31, 2026

Cocaine was found at Biden’s house, dead body at Obama’s house, a male prostitute at Pelosi’s house, and an illegal server was found at Clinton’s house, so the FBI RAIDED TRUMP’S HOUSE!

— BraveHeart (@Braveheart_USA) October 30, 2026

Brother Bob is no longer on Facebook (although you can see his archives there), and is back on Twitter again, but is ramping up on Minds and Gab, and has his biggest presence on MeWe.Cross posted at Flopping Aces
Cross posted from Brother Bob’s Blog