<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.science20.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>rychardemanne&#039;s blog</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium</link>
 <description>Science 2.0® - Science for the next 2,000 years, Non-profit, non-partisan, independent.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A Tribute To Richard Feynman: Feynman Point Pilish Poems 2013</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/tribute_richard_feynman_feynman_point_pilish_poems_2013-111712</link>
 <description>Richard Feynman was born on 11 May 1918. Today would have been his 95th birthday. This isn’t a paean to a physicist – it could be, but I’m sure millions of words have been published on this – but a game for wordsmiths and numberphiles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Within the highly restricted format of the Pilish Poem, the aim is to be both enlightening and eloquent; plus to have some fun playing around.You can follow my train of thoughts at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/feynman_point_and_pilish_poetry-107930&quot;&gt;my first article on this&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;so, without repeating myself, I’ll jump right in with the basic rules of what constitutes a Feyman Point Pilish Poem.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/tribute_richard_feynman_feynman_point_pilish_poems_2013-111712&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/random_thoughts">Random Thoughts</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 04:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">111712 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Math-e-Monday Puzzle: A Jailer&#039;s Revenge</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/mathemonday_puzzle_jailers_revenge-107969</link>
 <description>This is a fairly new problem, being traced back to as recently as 2003. However, it also has the kind of counter-intuitive solution that has made it a favourite on mathematical websites and forums. In its various retellings, it sometimes suffers from a lack of stringent conditions that result in rather imaginative solutions; perfectly legitimate solutions within the parameters set but not always the ‘classic’ one. If you’ve seen this before, then speed-read to the end where we take the side of the jailer!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The problem&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/mathemonday_puzzle_jailers_revenge-107969&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/mathematics">Mathematics</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107969 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Feynman Point And Pilish Poetry</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/feynman_point_and_pilish_poetry-107930</link>
 <description>When I was a kid, I would happily play around with both words and numbers – I still do. Both have their aesthetic appeal. Whether it is constructing and deconstructing mathematical puzzles or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/blog/science_cryptic_crossword_scx1&quot;&gt;cryptic crosswords&lt;/a&gt;, they appear as small artefacts that reveal a grander architecture. Combine this with the serendipity of the internet, and Pi Day was just a hop, skip and jump away from Richard Feynman and pilish poetry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/feynman_point_and_pilish_poetry-107930&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/random_thoughts">Random Thoughts</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107930 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Math-e-Monday Puzzle: Polygons In Rings</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/mathemonday_puzzle_polygons_rings-107379</link>
 <description>The diagram below shows five concentric circles constructed in such a way that the area of each annulus is equal to that of the central circle. Within the first annulus, a square has been constructed such that none of the points on the square lie outside the inner or outer radii of that ring. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the first annulus, A(1), with radii r(1) and r(2), n=4 is the minimum value of n such that a regular n-gon lies wholly within or on the boundary of A(1).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Find the smallest value of n, such that a regular n-gon will not fall outside the annulus A(m) bounded by r(m) and r(m+1) for values of m = 2, 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, what is the smallest value of n for A(50)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/mathemonday_puzzle_polygons_rings-107379&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/mathematics">Mathematics</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">107379 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Math-e-Monday Puzzle: Weird Dice</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/mathemonday_puzzle_weird_dice-106641</link>
 <description>Alice wants to play a game with Bill. She has just bought some new and rather strange dice. The average of each die is 3.5, just like a normal playing die, but the numbers on each face have an unfamiliar distribution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Die P has the numbers 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 6.&lt;br /&gt;Die Q has the numbers 2, 2, 2, 5, 5, 5.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The game itself is very simple: whoever rolls the highest total wins a sweet from the candy box. If the box becomes empty, the winner can take one from the other player’s pile.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/mathemonday_puzzle_weird_dice-106641&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/mathematics">Mathematics</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 03:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">106641 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Prime Valentine&#039;s Day</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/prime_valentines_day-103673</link>
 <description>It is somewhat surreal to see the discovery of the largest prime number paraded on prime time broadcast media. Mathematicians around the world are asked to explain the significance of this discovery in layman’s terms, which is up there with physicists trying to explain what the Large Hadron Collider actually does.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Below you’ll see a pretty sparky Sky News interview by Eugenia Cheng, a senior lecturer at the University of Sheffield. Just notice at the very end how jolly pleased with themselves the newscasters seem to be.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/prime_valentines_day-103673&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/mathematics">Mathematics</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">103673 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Business Of Science</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/business_science</link>
 <description>I think there is something deeply wrong with our view of science. The word itself, Science (with a capital &quot;S&quot;), sits alongside other monoliths such as Religion, Art, Music, Literature, Politics and so forth that require constant defining just to ensure we&#039;re talking about the same thing. The problem with science is that we are taught a myth... and then complain when the myth is incommensurate with reality.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/business_science&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/science_society">Science &amp; Society</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73845 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Father Of Fractals Benoit Mandelbrot Dies Age 85</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/father_fractals_benoit_mandelbrot_dies_age_85</link>
 <description>Benoit Mandelbrot died on 14 October 2010 in a hospice in Cambridge, Massachusetts, at the age of 85. His name is synonymous with the study of fractals, a term he himself coined in the 1970s. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension&lt;/em&gt; was published in English in 1977 (the original French came out two years earlier) but the book that sealed Mandelbrot&#039;s fame as an original thinker was the 1982 classic, &lt;em&gt;The Fractal Geometry of Nature&lt;/em&gt;. It is one of those rare books that can be read both by professionals and lay readers. It also helps that it is copiously illustrated so that even if the mathematics may appear esoteric just relax and enjoy the visual candy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/father_fractals_benoit_mandelbrot_dies_age_85&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/mathematics">Mathematics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72916 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shock Revelation: Drug Trials Funded By Drug Companies Show Positive Bias</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/shock_revelation_drug_trials_funded_drug_companies_show_positive_bias</link>
 <description>Drug trials conducted by the very pharmaceutical company with an obvious vested interest in a positive result are far more likely to yield a... positive result!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Perhaps not earth-shattering news to anybody with a gram of cynicism in their body but is still an orchestrated effort to undermine the credibility of science as anything higher than the distortion of data in the name of money.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/shock_revelation_drug_trials_funded_drug_companies_show_positive_bias&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/clinical_research">Clinical Research</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70261 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Spirituality Of Scientists</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/spirituality_scientists</link>
 <description>A new book, just about to be published, has already caused a stir in the blogosphere. “Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think” by Elaine Ecklund, a sociologist from Rice University, claims that scientists are less atheistic than previously thought.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The dustjacket blurb explains:”In the course of her research, Ecklund surveyed nearly 1,700 scientists and interviewed 275 of them. She finds that most of what we believe about the faith lives of elite scientists is wrong. Nearly 50 percent of them are religious. Many others are what she calls “spiritual entrepreneurs,” seeking creative ways to work with the tensions between science and faith outside the constraints of traditional religion…..only a small minority are actively hostile to religion.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/spirituality_scientists&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/science_society">Science &amp; Society</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67559 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NASA&#039;s Moon Missions Launch Pad Leader, Guenter Wendt, Dies At 85</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/nasas_moon_missions_launch_pad_leader_guenter_wendt_dies_85</link>
 <description>There was a time when kids dreamt of being astronauts - a time when going up to the Moon was sexy and being a spaceman was the coolest job on the planet. As astronauts became global heroes they themselves were only too aware that there were many more heroes whose feet remained firmly on the ground but without whom those Moon missions would never have happened: Guenter Wendt was one of those heroes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/nasas_moon_missions_launch_pad_leader_guenter_wendt_dies_85&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/space">Space</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67491 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Scientists In Parliament: The More The Merrier?</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/scientists_parliament_more_merrier</link>
 <description>The UK has a General Election looming on 6 May, thereby giving newspapers enough hot air to puff up their websites. But what should their science writers talk about during such times? With the launch of Britain&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scientificblogging.com/florilegium/welcome_science_party&quot;&gt;Science Party&lt;/a&gt;, science journalists can now also join in the ritual inflation of unlikely promises, although in science&#039;s case it is more likely a desperate attempt to be heard at all. Mark Henderson of The Times has, however, launched into this with a certain relish, without forgetting that the science reader also wants some data to bite on. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/scientists_parliament_more_merrier&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/science_education_policy">Science Education &amp; Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67278 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Welcome To The Science Party</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/welcome_science_party</link>
 <description>Welcome To The Science Party&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, 20 April, sees the launch of The Science Party, a new political party led by bestselling author and New Scientist consultant Dr Michael Brooks. Brooks is standing for the party in the forthcoming British general election in the East Midlands constituency of Bosworth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brooks launched &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scienceparty.org.uk/&quot;&gt;The Science Party&lt;/a&gt;, whose slogan is “Because Science Matters”, at a Skeptics event in Leicester on Tuesday evening.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/welcome_science_party&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/science_society">Science &amp; Society</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67047 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Biologist And Former Dominican Wins £1 Million Templeton Prize For Science And Religion</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/biologist_and_former_dominican_wins_%C2%A31_million_templeton_prize_science_and_religion</link>
 <description>&quot;Francisco J. Ayala, an evolutionary geneticist and molecular biologist who has vigorously opposed the entanglement of science and religion while also calling for mutual respect between the two, has won the &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.templetonprize.org/currentwinner.html&quot;&gt;2010 Templeton Prize&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Yet again the prize has gone to a scientist who says nice things about religion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;Ayala, 76, a naturalized American who moved from Spain to New York in 1961 for graduate study and soon became a leader in molecular evolution and genetics, has devoted more than 30 years to asserting that both science and faith are damaged when either invades the proper domain of the other.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/biologist_and_former_dominican_wins_%C2%A31_million_templeton_prize_science_and_religion&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/science_society">Science &amp; Society</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 06:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66280 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Quantum Entanglement In The Visible Universe</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/quantum_entanglement_visible_universe</link>
 <description>Quantum mechanics has been around for a hundred years and continues to fascinate and astonish scientists. It has been phenomenally successful at explaining the microscopic universe at the level of atoms and elementary particles and yet classical mechanics has survived to model the macroscopic world of everyday objects. But at what level do these two theories meet? Is there a region in which they could overlap; that is, can macroscopic objects display quantum behaviour?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/quantum_entanglement_visible_universe&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/physics">Physics</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66220 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Is The Date For Easter Calculated?</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/how_date_easter_calculated</link>
 <description>Easter is the most important festival in the Christian calendar as it defines a number of theological doctrines. However, Easter has always been a movable feast which can take place on any date between 22 March and 25 April inclusive. The actual methods for calculating Easter have changed down the centuries and, whereas the Gregorian calendar is probably the simplest solar calendar we will ever have, the ecclesiastical calendar on which Easter is based seems to have got ever more obscure and intricate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/how_date_easter_calculated&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/science_history">Science History</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66132 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is This How Brain Waves And Neurons Create Consciousness?</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/how_brain_waves_and_neurons_create_consciousness</link>
 <description>I had previously speculated on how electric and magnetic fields generated by individual neurons may be able to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scientificblogging.com/florilegium/can_neurons_communicate_distance_electromagnetic_signals&quot;&gt;transmit information&lt;/a&gt; to other neurons with which they are not in synaptic contact. From a purely physical point of view it strikes me as at least something to investigate. After all, we know that there are broad sweeps of electric fields that travel across the brain - whether alpha, beta, gamma, delta or theta waves. Such endogenous fields are both generated by the brain and feed back upon the brain. There must therefore be a mechanism by which such emergent fields are generated, sustained and propagated by the basic units of our brain: the neurons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/how_brain_waves_and_neurons_create_consciousness&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/neuroscience">Neuroscience</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65813 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What Are The Symptoms Of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity?</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/what_are_symptoms_electromagnetic_hypersensitivity</link>
 <description>The first cases of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (often referred to as electro-hypersensitivity or even EHS) were studied in the 1970s and yet decades later few people are even aware of the condition. We living human beings are more than just flesh and blood; we are also a highly complex electromagnetic system. This also means that we interact with external electromagnetic radiation (EMR). But try switching off every single electrical device in your home and work and ponder on how dependent we now are on these devices. The problem is that no importance is given to how detrimental all this EMR is to human health.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/what_are_symptoms_electromagnetic_hypersensitivity&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/public_health">Public Health</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65707 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Fat People Don&#039;t Lose Weight. The Diet Delusion</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/why_fat_people_dont_lose_weight_diet_delusion</link>
 <description>Who says science journalism is dying when it seems to be gloating about slaying one sacred cow after another: chiropractic, homoeopathy and now... dieting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The internet is bursting to the seams with weight loss programs, slimming advice, nutrition counselling, fitness regimes, low fat, low carb, low salt, low sugar, low motivation diets. It&#039;s enough to drive one to drink, except that it would also make you fatter...or would it?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/why_fat_people_dont_lose_weight_diet_delusion&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/public_health">Public Health</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65698 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Can Neurons Communicate At A Distance With Electromagnetic Signals?</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/can_neurons_communicate_distance_electromagnetic_signals</link>
 <description>I&#039;ve been pondering this for some time and have just now been fired into action by a comment I made in another article “&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scientificblogging.com/mark_changizi/building_smarter_artificial_intelligence_shrinking_body&quot;&gt;Building&amp;nbsp; Smarter Artificial Intelligence&amp;nbsp; By... Shrinking the Body?&lt;/a&gt;” One approach to artificial intelligence is to model the activities of neurons as electrical circuits with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. The model assumes that each individual neuron affects only those other neurons with which it has direct contact at the synapses. But, we also know that an electrical signal will also generate an electromagnetic field.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/can_neurons_communicate_distance_electromagnetic_signals&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/neuroscience">Neuroscience</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65693 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Too Many People Misdiagnosed With Depression: Blame The Criteria Or The Doctors?</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/too_many_people_misdiagnosed_depression_blame_criteria_or_doctors</link>
 <description>A study in the March edition of the &lt;em&gt;American Journal of Psychiatry,&lt;/em&gt; senior-authored by Jerome C. Wakefield, empirically challenges the effectiveness of psychiatrists&#039; official diagnostic manual in preventing mistaken, false-positive diagnoses of depression. This isn&#039;t the first time that Wakefield has challenged the DSM criteria for diagnosing depression. His first assault caused such controversy that the criteria were slightly tightened, but DSM-V is on the horizon and I suspect psychiatrists are busy pushing their particular niche obsessions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/too_many_people_misdiagnosed_depression_blame_criteria_or_doctors&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/public_health">Public Health</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65618 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pi Grows To Record Digits: But Is This Normal Behaviour?</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/pi_grows_record_digits_normal_behaviour</link>
 <description>On 31 December 2009, Fabrice Bellard announced that he had set a new world record for the most number of digits of the number pi. His algorithm has calculated the first &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://bellard.org/pi/pi2700e9/announce.html&quot;&gt;2.7 trillion digits&lt;/a&gt; of this famous mathematical constant, beating the previous record of 2.5 trillion digits set earlier in the year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/pi_grows_record_digits_normal_behaviour&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/mathematics">Mathematics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65598 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Life In Deep Space? Organic Molecules Found In The Orion Nebula</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/life_deep_space_organic_molecules_found_orion_nebula</link>
 <description>ESA’s Herschel Space Observatory has revealed the chemical fingerprints of potential life-enabling organic molecules in the Orion Nebula, a nearby stellar nursery in our Milky Way galaxy. This detailed spectrum, obtained with the Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared (HIFI) - one of Herschel&#039;s three innovative instruments - demonstrates the gold mine of information that Herschel-HIFI will provide on how organic molecules form in space. Several German Institutes contributed essential parts to the HIFI instrument: the Universität zu Köln and two Max Planck Institutes: Radioastronmie (Bonn) and Sonnensystemforschung (Lindau).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/life_deep_space_organic_molecules_found_orion_nebula&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/space">Space</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65453 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Irrational Exuberance – Thank Goodness It&#039;s Pi Day!</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/irrational_exuberance_%E2%80%93_thank_goodness_its_pi_day</link>
 <description>March 14th is Pi Day, and that&#039;s official! This tradition was started at the Exploratorium, in San Francisco, and 2010 will be their 22nd year of irrational exuberance. It also coincides with Einstein&#039;s date of birth – which was on 14 March 1879 – so it&#039;s a double celebration for geeks around the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/irrational_exuberance_%E2%80%93_thank_goodness_its_pi_day&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/mathematics">Mathematics</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65479 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sexsomnia: A Sleep Disorder With Sexual Behaviour</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/sexsomnia_sleep_disorder_sexual_behaviour-65417</link>
 <description>Making love in the middle of the night while both of you are half asleep is undoubtedly pleasurable. But what if you suddenly realize that your partner is still asleep; not just &lt;em&gt;half &lt;/em&gt;asleep but fully asleep on the job? If so, then he or she may be suffering from sexsomnia, a rare sleep disorder involving sexual behaviour.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/sexsomnia_sleep_disorder_sexual_behaviour-65417&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/psychology">Psychology</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65417 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Richard Dawkins Forum: Evolution Or Extinction?</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/richard_dawkins_forum_evolution_or_extinction-65260</link>
 <description>Richard Dawkins should write a paper entitled &quot;How not to run a Web 2.0 website.&quot; Perhaps apt that he is now the &lt;em&gt;former &lt;/em&gt;Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science, as he has shown little understanding of his public, which has also damaged his efforts at science communication. How can I make such bold statements?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/richard_dawkins_forum_evolution_or_extinction-65260&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/science_society">Science &amp; Society</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65260 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is Science A Belief? Is Religion A Science? Recent Research</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/science_belief_religion_science_recent_research</link>
 <description>“Is religion a science?” This may seem an odd question with which to start, but this is the very first question Aquinas asks in his monumental &lt;em&gt;Summa Theologica&lt;/em&gt;. “Among the philosophical sciences one is speculative the other practical [natural philosophy], nevertheless sacred doctrine [Roman Catholicism] includes both; as God, by one and the same science, knows both Himself and His works.” For Aquinas, not only is theology both a speculative and natural philosophy but it is also superior to both, in as much as it is guided by divine knowledge, which cannot be misled, and has as its end ultimate bliss, towards which all other sciences strive too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/science_belief_religion_science_recent_research&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/neuroscience">Neuroscience</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65166 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Science Is Awesome! Sack The Journalists!</title>
 <link>http://www.science20.com/florilegium/science_awesome_sack_journalists</link>
 <description>In December 2008 CNN announced that it was closing down its whole science and technology production team and moving the environmental agenda into their general news. It was as if the news world had just lost a continent, prompting four of the world&#039;s leading science and environmental journalism groups to pen their first ever joint letter of protest. &quot;In wielding this axe, your network has lost an experienced and highly regarded group of science journalists at a time when science coverage could not be more important in our national and international discourse.&quot; Nevertheless, &lt;A title=&quot;CNN axes science team&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/cnn_cuts_entire_science_tech_t.php&quot;&gt;the axe fell&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/florilegium/science_awesome_sack_journalists&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.science20.com/science_society">Science &amp; Society</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mankiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64816 at http://www.science20.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
