<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Government Law &#8211; FMGBlogLine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/category/government-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine</link>
	<description>Freeman Mathis &#38; Gary Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Oh, Snap! Supreme Court Rules School District Violated Cheerleader’s First Amendment Rights in Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/government-law/oh-snap-supreme-court-rules-in-school-district-violated-cheerleaders-first-amendment-rights-in-mahanoy-area-school-district-v-b-l/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Tia Combs and Racheal Slimmon On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a controversial holding by the Third Circuit that schools cannot regulate students’ speech outside of the school’s walls. In doing so, the Court reaffirmed that while a school’s ability to restrict student speech outside of the schoolhouse gates is less than it [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Certiorari in the Georgia Supreme Court by the Numbers</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/business-litigation/tort-and-catastrophic-loss-ga/certiorari-in-the-georgia-supreme-court-by-the-numbers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appellate Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort and Catastrophic Loss - GA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12297</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Jacob Daly The Georgia Court of Appeals has just ruled against your client, and so you’re considering whether you should file a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Georgia Supreme Court.&#160;Your client wants to know the likelihood of your petition being granted and, if it is granted, what the possible outcomes are [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Changes to the HIPAA Privacy Rule</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/government-law/proposed-changes-to-the-hipaa-privacy-rule/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 13:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Joseph Colette The United States Department of Health and Human Services’ (“HHS”) Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) has announced new changes to the Standards for the Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (the “HIPAA Privacy Rule”). The revisions to the HIPAA Privacy Rule address the following [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Supreme Court Considers Discipline for Off-Campus Student Speech</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/government-law/the-supreme-court-considers-discipline-for-off-campus-student-speech/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 19:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off-Campus Student Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Rachael Slimmon Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case that tests the boundaries of a school’s right to control the off-campus speech of its students. In Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.,a Pennsylvania public high school student expressed her frustration over not making the varsity cheerleading team by posting a [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clemson University Settlements Highlight Trends in Title IX Sports Claims</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/government-law/education/clemson-university-settlements-highlight-trends-in-title-ix-sports-claims/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clemson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Candice Jackson and Wayne Melnick As colleges and universities face budget shortfalls that may be especially sharp due to challenges posed by COVID-19, two pre-litigation settlements reached by Clemson University last week highlight the risks to educational institutions of patching budget deficits by cutting sports teams. Citing financial challenges caused by COVID-19, Clemson announced [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FMG Education Law Blog Series: Special Education Issues Facing Schools in the COVID-19 Era</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/government-law/education/fmg-education-law-blog-series-special-education-issues-facing-schools-in-the-covid-19-era-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centers for Disease Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Health Organization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Tia Combs and Candice Jackson Part 2: “A Year Online”&#160; A New and Deadly Virus In January 2020, few Americans were aware the outbreak of a novel coronavirus that was about to dramatically alter how nearly every person and institution conducted their daily lives. On January 29, 2020, there were only five cases total [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Supreme Court Clarifies Duty of Care, With Special Implications for Claims by Students and Minors</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/government-law/california-supreme-court-clarifies-duty-of-care-with-special-implications-for-claims-by-students-and-minors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Taekwondo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Candice Jackson&#160;and Robert A. Cutbirth April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month.&#160;On&#160;the&#160;first day of this important month, the California Supreme Court&#160;issued Brown v. USA Taekwondo.&#160;Arising from allegations of sexual assault by members of the United States’ women’s taekwondo team against their coach and the sport’s governing bodies, the decision redefines the process Courts must undertake [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia&#8217;s New Elections Law May Have Effects For Local Governments</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/government-law/georgias-new-elections-law-may-have-effects-for-local-governments/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Kemp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By:&#160; William J. Linkous, III Georgia’s new elections law, which has been widely reported upon nationally, passed the Georgia General Assembly during the 2021 session and was signed into law by Georgia Governor Brian Kemp near the end of March.&#160; The 95-page revision may significantly affect the operations of local governments, which are often tasked [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS Grants Injunctive Relief In Free Exercise Case Challenging California’s COVID-19 Restrictions</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/government-law/scotus-grants-injunctive-relief-in-free-exercise-case-challenging-californias-covid-19-restrictions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 20:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12074</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Caitlin Tubbesing Building on its pandemic-era Free Exercise Clause decisions, SCOTUS rejected the Ninth Circuit’s analysis of California’s COVID restrictions on religious activities for the fifth time on Friday (4/9/21). &#160;In a 5-4 vote in Tandon, et al. v. Newsom, et al., the majority granted two California pastors’ application for emergency injunctive relief relating [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did New Mexico Really “End” Qualified Immunity?</title>
		<link>https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/government-law/did-new-mexico-really-end-qualified-immunity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmg-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualified Immunity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fmglaw.com/FMGBlogLine/?p=12054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Wes Jackson State and federal legislators are making a concerted push to end or curtail the defense of “qualified immunity,” which provides government employees a defense to civil rights claims in some circumstances. At the federal level, House Democrats have passed the “George Floyd Justice in Policing Act (H.R. 1280), which, if passed by [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
