<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BSE Focus</title>
	<atom:link href="https://focus.bse.eu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://focus.bse.eu</link>
	<description>Research insights from the Barcelona School of Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:06:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">59603847</site>	<item>
		<title>How Election Cycles Shape Post-Disaster Growth</title>
		<link>https://focus.bse.eu/how-election-cycles-shape-post-disaster-growth/</link>
					<comments>https://focus.bse.eu/how-election-cycles-shape-post-disaster-growth/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcelona School of Economics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional and Urban Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://focus.bse.eu/?p=5048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://focus.bse.eu/how-election-cycles-shape-post-disaster-growth/" title="How Election Cycles Shape Post-Disaster Growth" rel="nofollow"><img width="792" height="300" src="https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/flood-focus.jpg?resize=792%2C300&amp;ssl=1" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="a flooded neighborhood where the entire ground floor is undewater" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/flood-focus.jpg?w=792&amp;ssl=1 792w, https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/flood-focus.jpg?resize=300%2C114&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/flood-focus.jpg?resize=396%2C150&amp;ssl=1 396w" sizes="(max-width: 792px) 100vw, 792px" /></a>Marcel Henkel, Eunjee Kwon, and Pierre Magontier find that electoral incentives significantly impacted US federal disaster aid distribution, affecting migration patterns and local economies post-hurricane.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://focus.bse.eu/how-election-cycles-shape-post-disaster-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5048</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Platforms Favor Their Own Services, Who Loses?</title>
		<link>https://focus.bse.eu/when-platforms-favor-their-own-services-who-loses/</link>
					<comments>https://focus.bse.eu/when-platforms-favor-their-own-services-who-loses/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcelona School of Economics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Industrial Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abuse of dominance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-preferencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tying]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://focus.bse.eu/?p=5034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://focus.bse.eu/when-platforms-favor-their-own-services-who-loses/" title="When Platforms Favor Their Own Services, Who Loses?" rel="nofollow"><img width="792" height="300" src="https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/doors-focus.jpg?resize=792%2C300&amp;ssl=1" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="A full-sized, open wooden door leading into a brightly lit room next to a miniature white door hidden behind a potted plant against a grey wall." style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/doors-focus.jpg?w=792&amp;ssl=1 792w, https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/doors-focus.jpg?resize=300%2C114&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/doors-focus.jpg?resize=396%2C150&amp;ssl=1 396w" sizes="(max-width: 792px) 100vw, 792px" /></a>Leonardo Madio, Fabio M. Manenti and Massimo Motta show that requiring equal access to a platform's own service and its rivals raises welfare and the platform's own profits]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://focus.bse.eu/when-platforms-favor-their-own-services-who-loses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5034</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unequal Lives, Unequal Benefits: Life Expectancy and Social Security Rules</title>
		<link>https://focus.bse.eu/unequal-lives-unequal-benefits-life-expectancy-and-social-security-rules/</link>
					<comments>https://focus.bse.eu/unequal-lives-unequal-benefits-life-expectancy-and-social-security-rules/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcelona School of Economics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 08:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Macroeconomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor force participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life expectancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://focus.bse.eu/?p=5017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://focus.bse.eu/unequal-lives-unequal-benefits-life-expectancy-and-social-security-rules/" title="Unequal Lives, Unequal Benefits: Life Expectancy and Social Security Rules" rel="nofollow"><img width="792" height="300" src="https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/social-security.jpg?resize=792%2C300&amp;ssl=1" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="A United States Social Security card sticks out of a pile of American currency" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/social-security.jpg?w=792&amp;ssl=1 792w, https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/social-security.jpg?resize=300%2C114&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/social-security.jpg?resize=396%2C150&amp;ssl=1 396w" sizes="(max-width: 792px) 100vw, 792px" /></a>Javier Fernández-Blanco and Virginia Sánchez-Marcos evaluate the welfare implications of retirement benefits that ignore predictable differences in life expectancy.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://focus.bse.eu/unequal-lives-unequal-benefits-life-expectancy-and-social-security-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5017</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designing Gender-Balanced Evaluation Committees with AI</title>
		<link>https://focus.bse.eu/designing-gender-balanced-evaluation-committees-with-ai/</link>
					<comments>https://focus.bse.eu/designing-gender-balanced-evaluation-committees-with-ai/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcelona School of Economics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 07:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[committee quotas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation committees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topic modeling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://focus.bse.eu/?p=5006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://focus.bse.eu/designing-gender-balanced-evaluation-committees-with-ai/" title="Designing Gender-Balanced Evaluation Committees with AI" rel="nofollow"><img width="792" height="300" src="https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/gender-balance-ai-focus.jpg?resize=792%2C300&amp;ssl=1" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/gender-balance-ai-focus.jpg?w=792&amp;ssl=1 792w, https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/gender-balance-ai-focus.jpg?resize=300%2C114&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/focus.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/gender-balance-ai-focus.jpg?resize=396%2C150&amp;ssl=1 396w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 792px) 100vw, 792px" /></a>J. Ignacio Conde-Ruiz, Miguel Diaz Salazar and Juan José Ganuza show how AI-designed evaluation committees address gender gaps in Economics, emphasizing topic alignment over demographic quotas.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://focus.bse.eu/designing-gender-balanced-evaluation-committees-with-ai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5006</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
