<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Folly Whack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://follywhack.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://follywhack.com/</link>
	<description>Beating Foolishness Into Submission</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 17:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">116456623</site>	<item>
		<title>Does The President Have To Be Sworn In With A Bible?</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/351/president-sworn-bible/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/351/president-sworn-bible/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 20:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Common Senseless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oath of office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On January 20, 2017, with his right hand raised and left hand on a Bible, Donald J. Trump will take the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_office_of_the_President_of_the_United_States" target="_blank">oath of office</a> as stipulated by Article II, Section One, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution, and be sworn in as the 45th President of the United States.</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/351/president-sworn-bible/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/351/president-sworn-bible/">Does The President Have To Be Sworn In With A Bible?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/351/president-sworn-bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">351</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shifting The Burden Of Proof, And Unfalsifiable Claims</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/319/shifting-burden-proof-unfalsifiable-claims/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/319/shifting-burden-proof-unfalsifiable-claims/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 03:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assertion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bertrand Russell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Sagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celestial teapot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logical fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Shifting the burden of proof&#8221; is when one party makes an unconfirmed assertion, while putting the burden to disprove the assertion on another party. It&#8217;s a logical fallacy because it puts the burden of proof on the negative instead of the affirmative. The burden of collecting evidence to support a claim lies with the person making the claim (the affirmative), not the person challenging the claim (the negative). It is not someone else&#8217;s job to debunk an unsubstantiated claim, and the inability to refute the claim does not make it more credible.</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/319/shifting-burden-proof-unfalsifiable-claims/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/319/shifting-burden-proof-unfalsifiable-claims/">Shifting The Burden Of Proof, And Unfalsifiable Claims</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/319/shifting-burden-proof-unfalsifiable-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">319</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reverse Racism Is Not A Thing</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/263/reverse-racism-fallacy/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/263/reverse-racism-fallacy/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 21:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black History Month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Lives Matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority social movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prejudice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Reverse racism could be described as racial discrimination against a majority race, that is, if we chose to legitimize a term that isn&#8217;t really a thing. After all, why wouldn&#8217;t we just call it racism? Why do some insist on calling it <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_racism" target="_blank">reverse racism</a>?</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/263/reverse-racism-fallacy/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/263/reverse-racism-fallacy/">Reverse Racism Is Not A Thing</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/263/reverse-racism-fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">263</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paradox Of Tolerance: Can You Be Intolerant Of Intolerance?</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/240/paradox-of-tolerance-can-you-be-intolerant-of-intolerance/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/240/paradox-of-tolerance-can-you-be-intolerant-of-intolerance/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 01:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Folly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tolerance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The paradox of tolerance is when a person of tolerance holds a negative, combative, or hostile stance toward intolerance. In other words, the tolerant person is indeed intolerant, at least when it comes to intolerance, hence the paradox.</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/240/paradox-of-tolerance-can-you-be-intolerant-of-intolerance/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/240/paradox-of-tolerance-can-you-be-intolerant-of-intolerance/">Paradox Of Tolerance: Can You Be Intolerant Of Intolerance?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/240/paradox-of-tolerance-can-you-be-intolerant-of-intolerance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">240</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Human Follies Of The Religious God-Fearing Variety</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/197/8-logical-fallacies-of-the-religious-god-fearing/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/197/8-logical-fallacies-of-the-religious-god-fearing/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logical fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universe]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Do not suffer the burden of religious god-fearing arguments when you can actively expose their folly. These logical fallacies exist outside the bounds of reasoned thought, deployed by zealous defenders as proof of their god and faith.</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/197/8-logical-fallacies-of-the-religious-god-fearing/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/197/8-logical-fallacies-of-the-religious-god-fearing/">8 Human Follies Of The Religious God-Fearing Variety</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/197/8-logical-fallacies-of-the-religious-god-fearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">197</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Gore Owns A Large Home, Global Warming Isn&#8217;t Real</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/176/tu-quoque-appeal-to-hypocrisy/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/176/tu-quoque-appeal-to-hypocrisy/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 02:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red herring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tu Quoque]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tu quoque, known also as the <em>appeal to hypocrisy</em>, is one of the more common logical fallacies. <a href="http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Tu_quoque" target="_blank">Tu quoque</a> is the attempt to discredit a person&#8217;s logical argument by pointing out said person&#8217;s apparent hypocrisy with regard to the argument&#8217;s conclusions.</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/176/tu-quoque-appeal-to-hypocrisy/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/176/tu-quoque-appeal-to-hypocrisy/">Al Gore Owns A Large Home, Global Warming Isn&#8217;t Real</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/176/tu-quoque-appeal-to-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">176</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Populum Fallacy: The Allure Of Popularity And Bandwagon Consensus</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/148/ad-populum-fallacy-bill-oreilly-fox-news-allure-of-popularity-bandwagon-consensus/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/148/ad-populum-fallacy-bill-oreilly-fox-news-allure-of-popularity-bandwagon-consensus/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2016 07:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Logical Fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blind loyalty fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viewership]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The <em>ad populum fallacy</em>, known also as <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum" target="_blank">argumentum ad populum</a>, </em>or simply the <em>bandwagon fallacy</em>, is when one appeals to the popularity of a belief as the very reason to believe it.</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/148/ad-populum-fallacy-bill-oreilly-fox-news-allure-of-popularity-bandwagon-consensus/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/148/ad-populum-fallacy-bill-oreilly-fox-news-allure-of-popularity-bandwagon-consensus/">Ad Populum Fallacy: The Allure Of Popularity And Bandwagon Consensus</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/148/ad-populum-fallacy-bill-oreilly-fox-news-allure-of-popularity-bandwagon-consensus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">148</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highway Lane Closure Ahead? You&#8217;re Merging All Wrong</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/122/construction-zone-ahead-you-are-merging-all-wrong/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/122/construction-zone-ahead-you-are-merging-all-wrong/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2016 00:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Folly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roadway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vehicle]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When you are traveling on a two-lane highway, and you see construction signs indicating your lane is closing ahead, what do you do? Try to get over as soon as possible? Or wait until the last minute? For most, common sense dictates you get over as soon as you safely can. However, this is not the most efficient use of roadway.</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/122/construction-zone-ahead-you-are-merging-all-wrong/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/122/construction-zone-ahead-you-are-merging-all-wrong/">Highway Lane Closure Ahead? You&#8217;re Merging All Wrong</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/122/construction-zone-ahead-you-are-merging-all-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">122</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Hair And Fingernails Appear To Grow After Death</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/111/why-hair-and-fingernails-appear-to-grow-after-death/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/111/why-hair-and-fingernails-appear-to-grow-after-death/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Myth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingernail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morbid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nail]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Fingernails and hair continuing an unruly spiral and tangle while six feet under could be the fate of some poor soul in a gruesomely awesome horror movie spectacle. But is there any truth to this myth?</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/111/why-hair-and-fingernails-appear-to-grow-after-death/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/111/why-hair-and-fingernails-appear-to-grow-after-death/">Why Hair And Fingernails Appear To Grow After Death</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/111/why-hair-and-fingernails-appear-to-grow-after-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">111</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Speech Censored? You&#8217;re Probably Wrong. Here&#8217;s Why.</title>
		<link>https://follywhack.com/98/what-first-amendment-freedom-of-speech-really-means/</link>
					<comments>https://follywhack.com/98/what-first-amendment-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 04:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://follywhack.com/?p=98</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It is time to break out your courseware, because this is <em>Freedom of Speech 101</em>. In the context of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, we are going to examine what &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221; means, and what it doesn&#8217;t mean.</p>
<p class="excerpt-link"><a href="https://follywhack.com/98/what-first-amendment-freedom-of-speech-really-means/">&#8764;&#160;Continue Reading&#160;&#8764;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com/98/what-first-amendment-freedom-of-speech-really-means/">Free Speech Censored? You&#8217;re Probably Wrong. Here&#8217;s Why.</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://follywhack.com">Folly Whack</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://follywhack.com/98/what-first-amendment-freedom-of-speech-really-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">98</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
