<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>freshnews.org - most clicked links</title>
    <link>http://www.freshnews.org/</link>
    <description>fresh tech news from around the web</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FreshnewsMostClicked" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
      <title>Apple Voiding Smokers' Warranties? (slashdot)</title>
      <description>Mr2001 writes "Consumerist reports that Apple is refusing to work on computers that have been used in smoking households. 'The Apple store called and informed me that due to the computer having been used in a house where there was smoking, [the warranty has been voided] and they refuse to work on the machine "due to health risks of second hand smoke,"' wrote one customer. Another said, 'When I asked for an explanation, she said [the owner of the iMac is] a smoker and it's contaminated with cigarette smoke, which they consider a bio-hazard! I checked my Applecare warranty and it says nothing about not honoring warranties if the owner is a smoker.' Apple claims that honoring the warranty would be an OSHA violation. (Remember when they claimed enabling 802.11n for free would be a Sarbanes-Oxley violation?)"Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~4/8A6eAeEKD0g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:35:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnews.org/article/slashdot/apple-voiding-smokers-warranties</guid>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~3/8A6eAeEKD0g/apple-voiding-smokers-warranties</link>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.freshnews.org/article/slashdot/apple-voiding-smokers-warranties</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>YouTube Shuts Down API Access, Leaves Set-Top Boxes High and Dry [YouTube] (gizmodo)</title>
      <description>There are two ways for a device to access YouTube: either through the regular web interface, i.e. Flash, or for cleaner integration, through its back end APIs. As of December, Google is shutting off the tap. The news comes from the COO of Syabas, the company that makes the Popcorn Hour set-top box. Up until now they'd had a loose agreement with the 'Tube: They can stream video from YouTube for free, but YouTube can change the terms of the deal whenever they want. Which they did!:  YouTube has always retained the right to change its terms of service in the future should it ever wish to do so. As a result of Google's decision, Syabas is no longer allowed to access YouTube through its APIs. To be clear, Syabas is not being singled out. With the exception of a few strategic partners Google has chosen to work with, the company has informed Syabas they are asking all over-the-top device makers that are currently connecting to YouTube content through its APIs to take down the service.  To quote every set-top box manufacturer in the world, probably: "shit." YouTube access had become the kind of thing you take for granted in a connected box or Blu-ray player, and it was nice to have. Now, it'll be limited to devices like the PS3, Wii, and TiVo—backed by the kinds of players who have the clout to pressure Google, or the money to pay them—leaving everyone else to search for some kind of hacky workaround. I understand that Google wants to squeeze some ad revenue out of YouTube, and that letting anyone and everyone access raw, ad-free through the backend probably isn't the best business plan, but this isn't Hulu—it's not like they have many powerful content providers to appease, just a bunch of teenagers with webcams. Set-top box folks: watch your free video cornucopia dissolve on December 2nd. [Syabas via Engadget via Lifehacker]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~4/gY3ZKinzbl0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:31:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnews.org/article/gizmodo/youtube-shuts-down-api-access-leaves-set-top-boxes-high-and-dry-youtube</guid>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~3/gY3ZKinzbl0/youtube-shuts-down-api-access-leaves-set-top-boxes-high-and-dry-youtube</link>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.freshnews.org/article/gizmodo/youtube-shuts-down-api-access-leaves-set-top-boxes-high-and-dry-youtube</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero-Day Vulnerabilities In Firefox Extensions (slashdot)</title>
      <description>An anonymous reader writes "Researchers have found several security holes in popular Firefox extensions that have an estimated total of 30 million downloads from AMO (the Addons Mozilla community site). Three 0-days were also released. Mozilla doesn't have a security model for extensions and Firefox fully trusts the code of the extensions. There are no security boundaries between extensions and, to make things even worse, an extension can silently modify another extension." The affected extensions are Sage version 1.4.3, InfoRSS 1.1.4.2, and Yoono 6.1.1 (and earlier versions). Clearly the problem is larger than just these three extensions.Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~4/rYgzLXepamw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:21:34 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnews.org/article/slashdot/zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-firefox-extensions</guid>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~3/rYgzLXepamw/zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-firefox-extensions</link>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.freshnews.org/article/slashdot/zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-firefox-extensions</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The 5 Best TVs You Can Buy [TVs] (gizmodo)</title>
      <description>We've teamed up with the HD Guru himself, Gary Merson, to publish the absolute best five TVs you can buy right now. As you'll see (and might already notice above), there are some surprises on the list. Panasonic Z1  Panasonic's flagship HDTV is its thinnest 54-inch plasma HDTV ever, with only 1-inch depth. They did it by eliminating a third sheet of glass found in all other plasmas except Pioneer's Kuro, and bonding the anti-reflective coating directly top glass. The Z1 employs SiBEAM's 60GHz 1080p for wireless glitch-free images sent via the included transmitter/media box from up to 30 feet away. The Z1 has THX picture mode and a custom calibration mode, plus nice bonus features including VieraCast Internet connectivity for YouTube and Amazon VOD and an SD card reader for photos. The Z1 delivers amazing performance with full 1080 line motion resolution, accurate HD color, deep black levels and 96Hz for judder free movie viewing. The sexiest HDTV of 2009, the TC-P54Z1 will set you back $4000. Pioneer Kuro Signature  You know it's been a weird year for TVs when not one but two of our top picks are no longer being manufactured, but are still being sold. Pioneer's sweetest (and last) Kuro line is technically a monitor: There's no tuner or audio. But the Signature models offer the deepest black of any high definition display on the market—without any white-letter-on-black-background halos occasionally seen on LED-based LCD TVs. The Signature models features hand selected parts, 2.5-in. depth, Custom Calibration, 72Hz refresh and control over the internet via its Ethernet connection. The Pioneer uses a single top sheet of glass to minimize internal reflections, with the anti-reflection coating bonded directly to the surface. The Signature models are available at scattered retailers around the country in the 50-inch size (PRO-101FD) for about $3000 to $3500, and 60-inch size (PRO-141FD) for $4000 to $4800. Samsung LNB8500  The 8500 series is Samsung flagship LED LCD TV. It feature packed with thin 1.6-inch depth, white LED local dimming backlights for improved uniformity, dual-chip 240 Hz plus a scanning backlight for excellent motion resolution and the best black level of any LED LCD observed to date. The 8500 features four HDMI inputs plus internet connectivity with Flickr, YouTube, weather, news and other widgets. It also has a PV+C input for connection to your computer or HTPC. This is a benchmark LED LCD to judge against every other make and model. All this performance comes at a price. The LNB8500 series comes in 46-inch (UN46B8500) and 55-inch (UN55B8500) screen sizes, currently on Amazon for $2620 and $4020, respectively. LG LH90  This LG has all the hot LCD performance features video freaks crave, including white LED dimming backlights for excellent black levels, wide viewing angle LCD IPS panel, accurate color, and 240Hz (120 refresh + scanning backlight) for excellent motion resolution. This LG also has all the tweaks anyone could ask for including ISF CCC mode for calibration, THX certification and LG's "picture wizard" for user set-up without calibration discs or external test signals. The LH90 isn't the thinnest LED LCD, but it more than makes up for it with its price. The LG LH90 series is available in 42-, 47- and 55-inch screen sizes at street prices that are considerably lower than many competitors' edge lit 120 Hz LED edge lit models. The 42LH90 is online for $1200 to $1500; the 47LH90 sells in the $1700 range; and the 55LH90 goes for $2200 to $2800. In case you couldn't tell, the LH90 series is the value/performance leader of the pack. Sony XBR8  A comparable model never replaced Sony's 2008 flagship model in 2009. It is the only HDTV available with separate red, green and blue LED backlights (rather than all white), with local dimming for deep black levels. Though slightly thicker than other TVs in its class, the XBR8 has accurate HDTV color, enough brightness for a beach house, a non-glossy anti-glare screen coating (rare for 2009), 120Hz refresh rate and Sony's Bravia Engine 2 signal processing. You can still find the XBR8s—we spotted the 46-inch KDL-46XBR8 for under $2200 and the 55-inch KDL-55XBR8 for under $4000. Gary Merson is the HD Guru, the industry's leading HDTV journalist. He's been reviewing TVs for well over a decade, and recently wrote a guide to choosing an HDTV.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~4/BAkb_iijpNI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:23:34 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnews.org/article/gizmodo/the-5-best-tvs-you-can-buy-tvs</guid>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~3/BAkb_iijpNI/the-5-best-tvs-you-can-buy-tvs</link>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.freshnews.org/article/gizmodo/the-5-best-tvs-you-can-buy-tvs</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Climatic Research Unit Hacked, Files Leaked (slashdot)</title>
      <description>huckamania was one of many readers to write with the news that the University of East Anglia's Hadley Climatic Research Unit was hacked, and internal documents released. Some discussion and analysis of the leaked items can be found at Watts Up With That. The CRU has confirmed that a breach occurred, but not that all 61 MB of released material is genuine. Some of the emails would seem to raise concerns about the science as practiced — or at least beg an explanation. From the Watts Up link: "[The CRU] is widely recognized as one of the world's leading institutions concerned with the study of natural and anthropogenic climate change. Consisting of a staff of around thirty research scientists and students, the Unit has developed a number of the data sets widely used in climate research, including the global temperature record used to monitor the state of the climate system, as well as statistical software packages and climate models. An unknown person put postings on some climate skeptic websites that advertised an FTP file on a Russian FTP server. Here is the message that was placed on the Air Vent today: 'We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps. We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code, and documents.' The file was large, about 61 megabytes, containing hundreds of files. It contained data, code, and emails apparently from the CRU. If proved legitimate, these bombshells could spell trouble for the AGW crowd." Reader brandaman supplied the link to the archive of pilfered data. Reader aretae characterized the emails as revealing "...lots of intrigue, data manipulation, attempting to shut out opposing points of view out of scientific journals. Almost makes you think it's a religion. Anyone surprised?" And reader bugnuts adds, for context: "These emails are certainly taken out of context, whether they are legitimate or fraudulent, which adds to the confusion."Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~4/kQp_3huLJ58" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:22:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshnews.org/article/slashdot/climatic-research-unit-hacked-files-leaked</guid>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreshnewsMostClicked/~3/kQp_3huLJ58/climatic-research-unit-hacked-files-leaked</link>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.freshnews.org/article/slashdot/climatic-research-unit-hacked-files-leaked</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>
