But a growing chorus in the developer community now questions Claude Code’s reliability. “I’m getting more mistakes,” “Output seems off,” and “It’s not what it was a few months ago” are common refrains in online forums and dev team chats. If you’re performance-driven, cost-conscious, and keenly focused on productivity, what should you do when your trusted AI tool starts to slip?

Let’s explore what’s happening with Claude Code, walk through the real impact of recent declines, and examine alternatives that may deliver a better blend of performance and value. As always, I’ll share hands-on lessons from Funcoder and actionable strategies you can put in play right away.

Feeling the Drift: Claude Code’s Recent Challenges

When Claude Code first hit the scene, it felt almost magical. Whether building a RESTful API, scaffolding out a React front end, or debugging thorny logic, the experience was often seamless. But lately, something’s shifted—and not for the better.

What developers are noticing:

• Sloppy Code Completions: Users report incomprehensible outputs, missing imports, or broken hooks—basic tasks now need more rework.
• Reduced Full-Stack Capability: Generating entire apps? Code is shell-like, scattered with TODOs, or omits key layers.
• Weaker Reasoning: Claude sometimes “hallucinates”—offering plausible-seeming, but fundamentally faulty, solutions.

At Funcoder, I put Claude Code through its paces for a recent internal project. Where it previously built working API endpoints in a sprint, this time, I found myself untangling ambiguous logic and patching glitches that crept in. Across hackathons and consulting gigs, similar themes emerged: increasing double-checks and lost trust—a real problem for any production-minded dev.

Why might this be happening? While the specifics remain behind vendor curtains, speculation centers on aggressive cost optimization, infrastructure bottlenecks, and the ever-growing pressure of scaling to a massive, global user base. Regardless of the reason, the developer experience has changed—with measurable productivity impacts.

What Do Performance-Driven Developers Really Need?

Before jumping ship, it pays to pinpoint what actually matters when choosing a coding assistant—especially when trust and turnaround time matter most.

Critical criteria for today’s developer:

• Consistency and Accuracy: Can you run generated code with minimal fixes?
• Deep Context Awareness: Does the AI “remember” large files, your style, and your stack?
• True Full-Stack Capability: Can it handle backend, frontend, DB migrations, and even DevOps scripts?
• Cost Efficiency: Not just a low monthly price—how much time and frustration does it really save?
• Integrations and Ecosystem: Easily fits with your favorite tools and workflows.

As a practitioner, my bottom line is simple: If I have to babysit my AI more than I benefit, it’s time to explore new options.

High-Performance Alternatives: Where Can Developers Turn?

Here’s a breakdown of some of the leading (and emerging!) options I’ve found to outperform Claude Code in reliability, depth, and value:

1. GPT-4o and GPT-4 Turbo (OpenAI)

OpenAI’s latest offerings shine in code comprehension and multi-step reasoning. They’re not perfect, but their ability to process longer context and deliver reliable output stands out.

• Strengths: Handles full-stack projects, excellent at code refactoring, strong on edge-case debugging.
• Weaknesses: Slightly higher cost, and occasional slowdowns during peak times.
• Real Example: On a recent consulting sprint, GPT-4o helped revamp legacy JavaScript into type-safe TypeScript, catching subtle bugs that previous models missed. For high-stakes code, the extra cost paid for itself in review-time savings.

2. Gemini Advanced (Google)

Google’s Gemini Advanced (formerly Bard) has surged ahead, especially with Python, JavaScript, and cloud integrations.

• Strengths: Integrates with Google Cloud, high reliability in script generation and data work.
• Weaknesses: Still evolving in niche frameworks, and interface can take time to master.
• Story: One startup I coached automated much of their data-pipeline linting using Gemini and found error rates dropped compared to past AI attempts.

3. Open-Source Models: Code Llama, StarCoder & Beyond

Open-source LLMs like Code Llama 70B and StarCoder are gaining credibility as viable, developer-friendly choices—especially for those with privacy or budget constraints.

• Strengths: Self-hosting means full control and no data sharing, with impressive fine-tuning opportunities.
• Weaknesses: Requires DevOps effort and infrastructure, and the “polish” sometimes lags behind giants.
• Tip: For batch scripts or teams with sensitive IP, running a slimmed-down LLM in-house can slash SaaS costs in half over time.

4. Cohere Command R+

While less mainstream, Cohere’s Command R+ is notable for speed and simplicity.

• Strengths: Fast API responses, tuned for enterprise use cases, solid documentation.
• Weaknesses: Slightly shallower code reasoning still catching up with larger models.
• Where it fits: Great for teams heavy on text-processing or requiring hybrid search-and-code capabilities.

Actionable Steps for Developers: How to Rethink Your AI Workflow

Ready to trial a new tool or optimize your coding stack? Here’s a battle-tested process:

1. Audit Your Current Pain Points

• Track where Claude (or any tool) causes rework—context loss, logic bugs, or integration challenges.

2. Benchmark Against Real Scenarios

• Test competing models with identical prompts from your own codebase, not just toy examples.

3. Try Before You Commit

• Leverage free/minimal-cost trial credits. Compare outputs side-by-side for reliability and accuracy.

4. Use Hybrid Workflows

• Mix tools: OpenAI for complex builds, open-source for private scripts or batch refactors.

5. Automate Quality Checks

• Always pair AI code output with automated linters, unit tests, and code review tools to safeguard against subtle bugs.

Bonus: If you’re part of a dev team, schedule brief “AI tool audits” each sprint. Crowdsourcing frustration points and wins will help the whole crew evolve smarter, faster.

Conclusion: The Road Ahead for AI Coding Assistants

The promise of AI-powered coding is alive and well—but tools like Claude Code must keep pace with developer needs and expectations. If your workflow is slowing, now is the time to test-drive alternatives, rethink your assistant strategy, and double down on performance and value.

At Funcoder, I’ll keep sharing insights and case studies as the AI landscape shifts. The power to streamline, experiment, and innovate is still in your hands—provided you choose the right partners, human and machine alike.

What’s Your Experience? Let’s Build Smarter—Together

Have you spotted changes (good or bad) in your AI coding assistant? Have you tried one of these alternatives, or found another that blows the rest away? Drop your stories, frustrations, and wins in the comments. Explore hands-on reviews, tutorials, and community deep-dives at funcoder.com—and subscribe to our newsletter to stay at the cutting edge of practical AI for developers.

Let’s make coding—and co-creating with AI—better, faster, and more fun for everyone.

Meta Quest 3

The Meta Quest 3 has made significant strides in the VR industry, offering a blend of affordability, performance, and mixed reality capabilities that cater to both enthusiasts and professionals. Here’s a detailed description of the headset based on user experiences and expert reviews.

Design and Comfort

The Meta Quest 3 is designed with a slimmer profile and improved weight distribution, which enhances comfort during extended use. Users have reported that the comfort is a notable improvement over previous models, although some have experienced discomfort on the cheeks after prolonged use, suggesting that the default facial interface may not suit everyone. To address this, users have recommended third-party straps and facial interfaces, such as the BoboVR, Kiwi, or AMVR, which can provide additional comfort and better weight distribution.

Performance and Display

Equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processor and 8GB RAM, the Meta Quest 3 delivers robust performance for a variety of applications

It features a higher-resolution display compared to its predecessor, offering a 2064 x 2208 resolution per eye, which significantly enhances visual clarity for VR experiences. The improved display and processor have been praised for their ability to handle demanding VR games and applications with better graphics and smoother frame rates.

Mixed Reality Capabilities

The Quest 3 integrates full-color passthrough and mixed reality features, allowing users to blend virtual and real-world elements. This has opened up new possibilities for professional use, such as collaborative design and visualization. However, the content and applications in the mixed reality domain are still developing, and some users may find the current offerings limited.

Battery Life and Charging

Battery life remains a concern for the Meta Quest 3, with users reporting approximately 2-3 hours of use on a single charge, which may not be sufficient for long work sessions. The headset takes about 2.3 hours to charge using the included 18W adapter. This has led some users to consider external battery packs or counterweights to extend usage time and improve comfort.

User Experiences

Users have generally had positive experiences with the Meta Quest 3, noting its improved comfort, performance, and mixed reality capabilities

The headset has been described as a significant upgrade from the Quest 2, with clearer visuals and a more balanced design that makes it suitable for longer VR sessions. While some users have encountered issues such as fan noise and lens overlap, these seem to be isolated cases. The consensus is that the Quest 3 is a fantastic standalone VR headset that justifies its price point, especially when compared to its predecessor and other high-end models like the Quest Pro. In summary, the Meta Quest 3 stands out as a top-rated VR headset for 2024, offering a compelling mix of affordability, performance, and mixed reality experiences. Its design improvements and hardware upgrades make it a strong contender for both VR enthusiasts and professionals looking for a versatile and immersive VR solution.

Pros:

• Affordability: The Meta Quest 3 is significantly less expensive than the Apple Vision Pro, making it a more accessible option for individuals and businesses.
• Performance: It boasts a higher-resolution display and a faster processor compared to its predecessor, the Quest 2, enhancing the clarity and smoothness of the VR experience.
• Mixed Reality Capabilities: The Quest 3 offers mixed reality experiences, blending the virtual and real worlds seamlessly, which can be beneficial for various professional applications.
• Comfort: It is noted for being more comfortable and lighter than previous models, which is crucial for extended use in a work setting.

Cons:

• Battery Life: The battery life is reported to be less than ideal, which could be a limitation for long work sessions without access to charging.
• Limited Mixed Reality Content: While it has mixed reality capabilities, the content and applications in this area are still developing and may not fully meet professional needs.
• Comfort Accessories: Some comfort issues may require additional purchases, like an upgraded head strap, to fix.

Immersed Visor

The Immersed Visor is generating considerable excitement within the virtual reality (VR) community, particularly among professionals looking for a work-focused VR solution. As the release date approaches in 2024, expectations are high, with users and industry observers keenly anticipating its impact on the VR landscape for productivity and professional use.

Design and Comfort

The Immersed Visor is heralded for its lightweight design, which is a significant departure from the bulkier headsets currently dominating the market. Weighing less than a smartphone, the Visor promises a comfort-first design that could redefine the standards for extended VR use in professional settings. Its resemblance to sunglasses or smart glasses, rather than traditional VR headsets, suggests a focus on wearability and ease of use throughout the workday. This design philosophy addresses one of the most common criticisms of current VR technology: the discomfort associated with wearing a heavy device for long periods. The optional backstrap for improved comfort further indicates Immersed’s commitment to creating a user-friendly experience.

Performance and Display

With twin 4K micro OLED displays, the Immersed Visor aims to offer unparalleled visual clarity, which is crucial for tasks requiring attention to detail. The high-resolution displays, combined with a 100-degree field of view and HD color passthrough, are expected to deliver a crisp and immersive visual experience that surpasses what’s available on the market at the moment5. This focus on high-quality visuals is particularly appealing to professionals who rely on visual fidelity for their work, such as designers, architects, and engineers.

User Expectations and Concerns

Despite the excitement, there are some concerns and tempered expectations within the community. The Visor’s focus on professional use means it may not cater to the broader VR market, including gaming and entertainment. Additionally, as a new entry into the hardware market by a company previously known for software, there are questions about the maturity of the platform and the level of support and content that will be available at launch. Users are also curious about the performance of the Visor’s lenses and how they will compare to other high-end VR headsets. There is a hope that the lenses will offer a wide sweet spot and high-quality visuals, but without concrete details, some are managing their expectations. In summary, the Immersed Visor is poised to make a significant impact on the VR industry, particularly for professional and productivity-focused users. Its lightweight design, high-resolution displays, and focus on comfort set it apart from existing options. However, as with any new technology, there are uncertainties and concerns that will only be addressed once the Visor is officially released and users can evaluate its performance firsthand.

Pros:

• Design for Work: Specifically designed for professional use, the Immersed Visor is optimized to run its VR desktop app, focusing on productivity.
• Lightweight: It is significantly lighter than other headsets, which is beneficial for long work periods.
• High-Resolution Displays: With twin 4K micro OLED displays, it offers sharp and clear visuals that are essential for detailed work.

Cons:

• Limited General Use: The Immersed Visor is designed exclusively for professional use and may not be suitable for other VR experiences like gaming or entertainment.
• Early Stage: As a new entry into the hardware market, there may be concerns about the maturity of the platform and the availability of support.

Apple Vision Pro

The Apple Vision Pro has been a topic of much discussion and anticipation since its announcement. As Apple’s foray into the mixed-reality headset market, it represents a significant step forward in spatial computing, blending augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) experiences. Here’s a closer look at what users have experienced with the Apple Vision Pro, based on expert reviews and user feedback.

Design and Comfort

The Apple Vision Pro is noted for its high-quality build and design, featuring a sleek and futuristic look. However, comfort seems to be a mixed bag among users. Some find the headset comfortable for short periods, but others report discomfort during longer sessions, particularly noting that it feels top-heavy and can press uncomfortably on the cheeks. Despite these issues, the inclusion of two headband options aims to distribute weight more evenly and enhance comfort.

Performance and Display

One of the most praised aspects of the Apple Vision Pro is its display quality. The headset boasts amazing micro-OLED displays, offering an immersive and visually stunning experience. Users are impressed by the clarity and detail of the visuals, whether they’re watching movies, playing games, or exploring AR apps. The eye-tracking interface is smooth and intuitive, allowing for seamless navigation and interaction within the virtual space.

User Experience and Applications

The Apple Vision Pro offers a range of applications and experiences, from entertainment to productivity tools. Users appreciate the ability to use familiar iOS apps in a new, immersive way, and the headset’s compatibility with MacBooks is highlighted as a magical feature. However, the availability of VisionOS-optimized apps is still limited, and some notable apps like Netflix and YouTube are missing at launch. Despite these limitations, the AR apps that are available provide jaw-droppingly convincing experiences that excite users about the potential of spatial computing.

Concerns and Limitations

Despite its innovative features, the Apple Vision Pro is not without its drawbacks. The high price point is a significant barrier for many potential users, making it a luxury item rather than a mainstream device. Additionally, the external battery and cord required for use can be cumbersome and detract from the overall experience. Some users also find the Digital Persona feature, which animates the user’s eyes on the outside of the headset, to be a bit creepy and in need of improvement. In conclusion, the Apple Vision Pro is a groundbreaking device that offers a glimpse into the future of computing and entertainment. Its high-quality display, intuitive controls, and potential for immersive experiences are highly praised by users. However, its high cost, comfort issues, and the current limitations in app availability are significant considerations for potential buyers. As the technology evolves and the ecosystem around the Vision Pro grows, it will be interesting to see how these challenges are addressed and how the device’s adoption expands beyond early adopters and tech enthusiasts.

Pros:

• High-Quality Display: Features a high-resolution display for clear and detailed visuals important for professional tasks.
• Advanced Sensors: Multiple cameras, microphones, and sensors provide a high level of interactivity and immersion.
• Controller-Free Operation: Gesture and eye movement controls can streamline tasks and make the experience more intuitive.

Cons:

• High Cost: The Vision Pro’s price point is significantly higher than other VR headsets, which may be prohibitive for some users and businesses.
• Short Battery Life: Limited battery life could be a major drawback for professionals needing extended use.
• Comfort: The front-heavy design may become uncomfortable over time, affecting productivity during longer sessions

In conclusion, each of these VR headsets has its strengths and weaknesses when it comes to work and productivity. The Meta Quest 3 offers a balance of performance and affordability, the Immersed Visor is tailored for professional use with high-resolution displays, and the Apple Vision Pro provides advanced features at a premium price. Users should consider their specific needs, budget, and the type of work they intend to perform in VR when choosing between these headsets.

The reasons for this post is wanting to share my views on how businesses need to become more agile and adventurous when choosing a programming language or framework to build your next project.

Don’t just stick with one language or architecture, even if that’s all your developers know. Trust me that productivity in building solutions in another tool, framework or language will be very positive as developers love to learn new skills and not be stuck in a rut using just one.

I used to be a pure .net developer at one point in my carrier and it was just a motivational killer moving from one project to the next using the same framework and C#.

Later on I had the opportunity to work for a company that allowed the flexibility of choosing a platform that suited the project. For example we needed an in house solution developed quickly after the disaster with a software house. After some research and experience testing RAD tools, I finally decided on a platform developed by a French company PCSoft, called WinDev. It’s rich programming language and development tools allowed the solution to be built and released in only a month. With full integration to their accounting system.

The next project was developed with NodeJS and Mongo using MeteorJS. It was enlightening at the time to build a web app solution using only JavaScript and have the power of reactive data using Publish / Subscribe. To this day I still enjoy using Meteor and I learned a lot about JavaScript and asncy in that and subsequent projects.

I don’t use a language or framework in a business project until have have a very good understanding of its capabilities, structure and built a few mini projects. For example I have been intrigued with Elixer at the moment so I guess you could say like you have to “do the knowledge” to become a London black cab driver, I need to do the same to hit the road running with Elixer and the Phoenix Framework.

It’s so important a business that has developers, to embrace new and emerging technologies. Do not call into the trap of sticking to one language just because it’s safe and that’s all your decelooers know. Push your developers to learn other technologies, even if they are low code solutions as change will spark their interest. Listen to them and find out what languages they would love to learn. Maybe it’s flutter as they want to create a mobile version of one of your apps.

Embrace change and to grow within your developers.

It’s important that you choose right music to listen while you are focusing.

Sing Along!

Singing along might sound fun but it will distract you from the job at hand. On the other hand playing classical music might make you do relaxed that it will send you to sleep.

A lot of developers will play chill out music, just have a watch on livecoding.tv and you will see what I mean. It will also give you an idea what sounds good to you. If you ask, the developer will usually let you know the Spotify or YouTube they are listening too. So don’t be shy to ask.

The Power Of Movies

Now I’m not saying watch a movie while you code. If you can do that then you have a much better multi tasking mind than I do.

What I am talking about is certain firm scores evoke energy and focus, especially if you know the movie. If you want an idea of what music I mean then try out my Spotify play list link below.

Quality Counts

OK so I’m a bit funny when it comes to the quality of music coming out of headphones or ear buds. I mean what’s the point in listening if it’s all muffled or just poor quality.

Your probably thinking that this means I must spend a small fortune on headphones. The answer is no I don’t. I have to admit I was in the apple store the other day and tried out some headphones which sounded amazing. Then I looked at the price. Omg £300, really.

The thing is you can buy a good pair of headphones for around £25-30 and Sony ear buds for £20 sound amazing. Just try them out and make sure they have a good range of high and low frequency.

You might also want to consider wireless headphones, which gives you the freedom to reach the coffee brewing away or just standing for a few minutes to move your body. Highly recommended, especially when your suck in one of those moments when a solution just won’t pop into your head.

Finally

There are moments your mind will crave silence, so don’t force it on yourself to listen. If you don’t feel at all motivated then your mind needs stimulation so try something upbeat. Your mind needs both exercise and rest but most of all fuel, so don’t forget to hydrate yourself while you code.

From my investigations into this issue, I believe it has something to do with the way that WebDev handles HTML element naming. Even though you have named an edit field something unique, this is not the ID/name used when it generates the HTML. Instead, it generates an Alias name, for example A10.

To overcome conflict with Chrome autocomplete, a neet trick I found is to do the following:

Set the control to read-only:

Finally, add code to the browser onfocus event to make the edit field active:

You will find now that Chrome will not autocomplete your field and all is well in the world of WebDev.

Please do share this tip with the world…

It’s that time of year again when PC Soft releases their new versions of developer products with exciting new features. Here’s some of the new stuff that I am especially excited about.

Layout Control

A better UI experience now as hidden controls currently just create gaps, but with the layout control all other controls move to fill the space.

End User Image Editor

You can now give the user capabilities to edit their own images, which is great when they wish to annotate an image or making size aadjustments.

PDF Viewer within app

No need to open a seperate PDF reader as now you can view direct within your app. This is great for me as not only can our users view Word documents within the app, they can now do the same for PDF which means no switching between apps.

Excel XLSX loading

We can even go one step further now and load Excel worksheets into the spreadsheet control as well as there being lots more features in the control.

Word Processor Control HTML Text Edit Mode

Now you can use the Wordprocessor control for user email creation without the need for them to switch to Outlook etc. This is a great feature which will enhance our products even further.

Quickly Create Tasks from Requirements

There a cool new interface that will allow you, for a selected requirement, create tasks and include dependencies. I’m using project monitoring more and more lately as a productivty tool to manage requirements and implement the features.

Naming Planes

I make great use of planes in windows so that I can quickly switch views for a particular piece of functionality. Previously these planes were named 1 to X but now you can edit the name and make them more descriptive, which helps you and other developers understand the purpose of a particular plane.

SQL in Code

There a new declaration variable SQL Query you can use in code that will assist you in writing SQL directly in code, with syntax hightlighting, code completion and detecting errors. This is a big one for me as I like to have control over my SQL when there are complex queries. Previously I would use SQL Manager to build and test the query, then copy and paste the SQL code into a WLanguage string variable. I’m not sure if it goes so far as to be able to test the SQL in this release but if not then that would be a great future release feature.

RandomCrypto

This is a very handy little function that will generate a random number where the sequence cannot be reproduced.

Setting a Procedure/Classes as deprecated

In WLanguage they call it Zombie Procedures. These are procedures/Classes that roam the code but will be removed in future versions as there are new procedure that have been introduced to perform a piece of functionality better.

Interface

We can now develop systems with a more modern approach, building an interface that a class can then implement. Makes the code a lot cleaner and is a welcome addition.

There’s so much more to WinDev 23 but these are just a few enhancements that really stood out for me.

Although I have been an evangelist of Salesforce for some years, I have yet to step into that world fully. But this is about to change as I plan to fully transition from a .NET developer onto the Salesforce platform, utilizing my skills I have learned along the way.

I look at the current state of development and see that Salesforce have got it right. Back in the days when I first started developing you had no choice but to build a solution from scratch, from creating a server infrastructure though to coding the solution.

Today this should not be the case and is not with Salesforce. You have the core business functionality you need, which can be expanded using clicks not code. When your business process requires something bespoke the coding comes in play with some Apex / JavaScript / SOQL / Lightning and along with it the all important unit test. I especially like the quality of the Lightning Design System for consistency with their new UI.

Mobile is one of the most important mediums for delivering solutions to a business as people’s lives change, commuting more, working remotely and businesses become more of a social family than a 9 to 5 job #Ohana, which I love to see as people spend a large proportion of their lives at work, so it should be fun, exciting, challenging and rewarding both from a business and a social perspective. just look at the new Salesforce Trailblazer community page to see what I mean.

So where does this fit into my life. Well it fits in perfectly with my outlook on where I should be now and in the future. But I want to share my journey that other developers in my field might find interesting and also if your like me and passed the 50 age mark

The first stage is to pass the Platform Developer I and Platform Developer II certifications, so I am hard at work studying for these using Trailhead and document resources.

I’m really looking forward to the future with Salesforce and helping others in the community any way I can.

In the next episode I will be giving tips and tricks on how to get the most out of Trailhead and brain hacks to make it all stick, so stay tuned.

Yes I am a .NET developer and have been for many years but the problem with coding on that platform is the amount of code you have to write to accomplish a task. This is why I also use a development tool called WinDev/WebDev from PC Soft to build solutions as the approach they have taken is the provide components that solve common requirements. They also go down to the level of code and to make simple methods to code that will also achieve results quickly, like displaying a Google map or creating a stack graph in a dashboard.

Salesforce has the same approach to the click first approach, allowing you to implement business requirements with a minimal or no code at all. To me this is the future of business software development where you only have to code the unique aspects of a solution rather than having to build a complete platform.

This is one of many reasons I have moved to Salesforce and the incredible work they are building in the Lightning platform. Yes I know there are aspects in Lightning that are still not complete but the future for Lightning components is very exciting for a developer like myself, giving me the ability to componentise UI and make that available to users on web and mobile platforms. Then on the back end you can develop the business functionality using Process Builder to visually implement logic.

For example I keep ideas for projects but sometimes I forget about them, so I wanted to be reminded if I had not looked at them for a while. This took just a few minutes to implement and now I get a cool reminder in my Chatter feed if I have not viewed an idea for more than 30 days.

When Click does not go far enough for you to complete your implementation then you still have Apex and JavaScript to work with. I personally don’t use the Force IDE but prefer to use a combination of the Developer Console and Cloud 9 IDE. I like to keep everything in the Cloud, even my IDE, which gives me the best flexibility and portability to code wherever I am.

If your a developer and interested in this approach then why not give it a try, just go to developer.salesforce.com and sign up for a developer account now. If you have any questions of need advice then there is a fantastic community of Salesforce Developers and Admins or just drop me a message.

Happy clicking!!!

A new update to the profile and dashboard have made it even more exciting to promote your Trails and Badges you have received.

This update has made me more determined to learn more through Trails and increase my knowledge, keeping up to date with all the latest features added to the platform and techniques to advance myself. If you are not used to this type of online learning experience then persevere as you will enjoy the process once you get into the swing of it.

The major advantage to training in say a video tutorial format is that with Trails you are reading the material to learn but then for many sections you will actually complete practical exercises in a developer org, which will be checked that it has been completed before you move on. This actual doing rather than watching or just reading is a powerful way to learn and remember what you have learned.

Here’s my Trailblazer profile if you want to watch my progress:

https://trailhead.salesforce.com/users/profiles/005500000060ZVrAAM

Happy Trailblazing!!!