<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Helpdesk Reports - GSDRC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gsdrc.org/gsdrc_pub_type/helpdesk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gsdrc.org</link>
	<description>Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 11:16:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Digital Infrastructure Interventions to Address Climate Adaptation and Mitigation Needs</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/digital-infrastructure-interventions-to-address-climate-adaptation-and-mitigation-needs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Piela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 11:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K4DD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=70540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This rapid evidence review collates available evidence on digital infrastructure interventions to address climate adaptation and mitigation needs drawing on lessons from across the world to inform the Ethiopian context. The review draws upon an expanding evidence base that includes academic and grey literature. The evidence base is evolving with an increasing range of countries rapidly adopting [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/digital-infrastructure-interventions-to-address-climate-adaptation-and-mitigation-needs/">Digital Infrastructure Interventions to Address Climate Adaptation and Mitigation Needs</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This<a href="https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Digital_Infrastructure_Interventions_to_Address_Climate_Adaptation_and_Mitigation_Needs/31376347?file=62034430"> rapid evidence review</a> collates available evidence on digital infrastructure interventions to address climate adaptation and mitigation needs drawing on lessons from across the world to inform the Ethiopian context.</p>
<p>The review draws upon an expanding evidence base that includes academic and grey literature. The evidence base is evolving with an increasing range of countries rapidly adopting digital infrastructure interventions to address complex challenges. The evidence notes that whilst digital infrastructure interventions can support adaptation and mitigation efforts, they can also be challenging to implement for a variety of social, economic and technical reasons.</p><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/digital-infrastructure-interventions-to-address-climate-adaptation-and-mitigation-needs/">Digital Infrastructure Interventions to Address Climate Adaptation and Mitigation Needs</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefits of South South Cooperation</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/benefits-of-south-south-cooperation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Piela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 12:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[K4DD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=70531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This K4DD Rapid Evidence Review explores the benefits of South-South cooperation, and the different approaches to cooperation. South-South cooperation (SSC) entails a wide range of collaboration among countries of the Global South, promoting collective action in relation to (among others) the economy, politics and the environment, and based on principles such as equality, national sovereignty and mutual [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/benefits-of-south-south-cooperation/">Benefits of South South Cooperation</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Benefits_of_South_South_Cooperation/30676277?file=59752469" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">K4DD Rapid Evidence Review</a> explores the benefits of South-South cooperation, and the different approaches to cooperation.</p>
<p>South-South cooperation (SSC) entails a wide range of collaboration among countries of the Global South, promoting collective action in relation to (among others) the economy, politics and the environment, and based on principles such as equality, national sovereignty and mutual benefit. It is much wider in scope than official development assistance (ODA), but this review focuses on SSC for development cooperation.</p>
<p>SSC has gained in prominence in recent decades, and represents a very different approach to ‘traditional’ North-South international development cooperation. Successful examples of SSC highlight its benefits, including cost-effectiveness, self-reliance and sustainability.</p><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/benefits-of-south-south-cooperation/">Benefits of South South Cooperation</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Interventions Impact Migration in the Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/what-interventions-impact-migration-in-the-eastern-neighbourhood-and-central-asia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Piela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 09:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Development Pressures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration & diaspora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K4D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K4DD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=70511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This K4DD Rapid Evidence Review explores the evidence about what types of interventions impact migration flows in the Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia regions (including both overseas development assistance (ODA) and non-ODA programming). The regions are defined as: Eastern Neighbourhood: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. While [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/what-interventions-impact-migration-in-the-eastern-neighbourhood-and-central-asia/">What Interventions Impact Migration in the Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/What_Interventions_Impact_Migration_in_the_Eastern_Neighbourhood_and_Central_Asia/30870488?file=60328208" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">This K4DD Rapid Evidence Review</a> explores the evidence about what types of interventions impact migration flows in the Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia regions (including both overseas development assistance (ODA) and non-ODA programming).</p>
<p>The regions are defined as: Eastern Neighbourhood: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.</p>
<p>While there is a growing body of research on global migration flows, including relating to the countries within the two regions of focus of this paper, there is little detailed analysis on the impact of interventions on these flows.</p><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/what-interventions-impact-migration-in-the-eastern-neighbourhood-and-central-asia/">What Interventions Impact Migration in the Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Education for out of School Children in South Sudan have Peacebuilding/Social Cohesion Benefits?</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/can-education-for-out-of-school-children-in-south-sudan-have-peacebuilding-social-cohesion-benefits/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Piela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Peacekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K4DD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=70398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This K4DD Rapid Evidence Review explores the potential peacebuilding/social cohesion benefits of targeting out of school children (OOSC) in South Sudan through community-based education activities. It focuses on the targeting methods, activities, and approaches taken by Education in Emergencies (EIE) programmes.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/can-education-for-out-of-school-children-in-south-sudan-have-peacebuilding-social-cohesion-benefits/">Can Education for out of School Children in South Sudan have Peacebuilding/Social Cohesion Benefits?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This K4DD Rapid Evidence Review explores the potential peacebuilding/social cohesion benefits of targeting out of school children (OOSC) in South Sudan through community-based education activities.</p>
<p>It focuses on the targeting methods, activities, and approaches taken by Education in Emergencies (EIE) programmes.</p><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/can-education-for-out-of-school-children-in-south-sudan-have-peacebuilding-social-cohesion-benefits/">Can Education for out of School Children in South Sudan have Peacebuilding/Social Cohesion Benefits?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/scaling-plastic-reuse-models-in-lmics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Piela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 09:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Access to services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development Pressures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K4DD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=70071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>To read the full article Click Here This Rapid Evidence Review  synthesizes the current evidence base on the design and scalability of “refill on the go” and “return on the go” plastic reuse models in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). With plastic pollution rising sharply, transitioning from single-use to reuse systems presents a significant opportunity [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/scaling-plastic-reuse-models-in-lmics/">Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Scaling_Plastic_Reuse_Models_in_LMICs/28640177?file=53175746">To read the full article Click Here</a></p>
<p>This Rapid Evidence Review  synthesizes the current evidence base on the design and scalability of “refill on the go” and “return on the go” plastic reuse models in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). With plastic pollution rising sharply, transitioning from single-use to reuse systems presents a significant opportunity to reduce waste and emissions. While such systems offer environmental and economic benefits—such as reduced material use, job creation, and lower life cycle emissions—scaling them remains challenging due to infrastructure constraints, inconsistent policy frameworks, and consumer behaviour dynamics. The review highlights key enablers for scaling, including reliable water and energy supplies, robust transport infrastructure, cultural acceptance, regulatory support, and product traceability. Case studies from countries such as Brazil, Indonesia, Kenya, and India illustrate diverse approaches, from corporate-led reuse initiatives to local community-driven solutions. However, most evidence stems from pilot programs with limited evaluation data. A coordinated, context-specific, and system-wide approach, underpinned by supportive policies and stakeholder collaboration, is essential to mainstream reusable packaging models across LMICs.</p>
<p><a href="https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Scaling_Plastic_Reuse_Models_in_LMICs/28640177?file=53175746">To read the full article Click Here</a></p><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/scaling-plastic-reuse-models-in-lmics/">Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment in Refugee Education</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/investment-in-refugee-education/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Piela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Humanitarian Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refugees/IDPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K4DD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=70048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This Rapid Evidence Review explores how investment in refugee education in Jordan and the wider Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region can contribute to deterring migration, reducing the systemic drivers of violent conflict, building resilience, and promoting greater social and economic stability. While the evidence base is mixed and largely illustrative, key findings suggest [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/investment-in-refugee-education/">Investment in Refugee Education</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-start="270" data-end="811">This Rapid Evidence Review explores how investment in refugee education in Jordan and the wider Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region can contribute to deterring migration, reducing the systemic drivers of violent conflict, building resilience, and promoting greater social and economic stability. While the evidence base is mixed and largely illustrative, key findings suggest that inclusive and quality education has both intrinsic and instrumental value—empowering individuals, enhancing employability, and fostering social cohesion.</p>
<p data-start="813" data-end="1242">However, challenges persist. Investment is often concentrated at the primary level, with limited access to secondary and tertiary education. Legal, financial, and institutional barriers—such as employment restrictions and credential recognition—limit the long-term benefits of education for refugees. Integration into national education systems and alignment with labour market opportunities are essential for maximising returns.</p>
<p data-start="1244" data-end="1594">Though education alone cannot resolve the root causes of displacement, it plays a critical role in building individual and societal resilience. To be effective, education initiatives must be inclusive of both refugee and host communities and be part of broader strategies that support sustainable development, peacebuilding, and economic integration.</p><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/investment-in-refugee-education/">Investment in Refugee Education</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pathways to Increase Rural Women’s Agency Within Social Protection Programmes</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/pathways-to-increase-rural-womens-agency-within-social-protection-programmes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Piela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Social protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K4DD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=70031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This rapid evidence review explores literature on how social protection programmes, particularly cash transfers and public works programmes, can address various dimensions of poverty and wellbeing that rural women face. This review focuses on the economic aspect of women’s livelihoods and wellbeing and examines how the design and implementation of social protection programmes can promote [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/pathways-to-increase-rural-womens-agency-within-social-protection-programmes/">Pathways to Increase Rural Women’s Agency Within Social Protection Programmes</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This rapid evidence review explores literature on how social protection programmes, particularly cash transfers and public works programmes, can address various dimensions of poverty and wellbeing that rural women face. This review focuses on the economic aspect of women’s livelihoods and wellbeing and examines how the design and implementation of social protection programmes can promote women’s agency. Women’s agency is defined as ‘the capacity for women and girls to make their own decisions, take purposeful actions and pursue goals without the fear of violence or retribution (The Gates Foundation, 2025: 1). The review summarises evidence from academic, policy focused, aid organisations and grey literature on how social protection programmes can increase the agency of women and girls in rural areas.</p>
<p><a href="https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Pathways_to_Increase_Rural_Women_s_Agency_Within_Social_Protection_Programmes/29085395?file=54590648">For the full report please visit the K4DD page</a></p><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/pathways-to-increase-rural-womens-agency-within-social-protection-programmes/">Pathways to Increase Rural Women’s Agency Within Social Protection Programmes</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local Perspectives on Reconciliation in the Western Balkans</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/local-perspectives-on-reconciliation-in-the-western-balkans/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Piela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[K4DD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=70015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This rapid evidence review explores how reconciliation is perceived and understood by local communities across the Western Balkans. Recognizing that the concept of reconciliation is inherently contested, the review synthesizes findings from academic literature, donor reports, and local studies, with a particular focus on Bosnia and Herzegovina. It identifies a broad spectrum of interpretations—ranging from [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/local-perspectives-on-reconciliation-in-the-western-balkans/">Local Perspectives on Reconciliation in the Western Balkans</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This rapid evidence review explores how reconciliation is perceived and understood by local communities across the Western Balkans. Recognizing that the concept of reconciliation is inherently contested, the review synthesizes findings from academic literature, donor reports, and local studies, with a particular focus on Bosnia and Herzegovina. It identifies a broad spectrum of interpretations—ranging from addressing historical injustices and acknowledging victims, to promoting interethnic cooperation in everyday life, economic integration, and political reform. Local actors view reconciliation as both a forward-looking and retrospective process, often tied to recognition, justice, and coexistence. The review highlights significant demographic and ethnic variations in understanding reconciliation. While Bosniaks often emphasize truth-telling and accountability, Bosnian Serbs tend to focus on pragmatic coexistence. Young people, though seen as potential drivers of reconciliation, frequently show indifference or are influenced by divisive narratives. Overall, the findings underscore the importance of contextual, multi-dimensional, and inclusive approaches to reconciliation that reflect the lived experiences and priorities of local communities.<a href="https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Local_Perspectives_on_Reconciliation_in_the_Western_Balkans/29314622?file=55742411">Click here for the full report</a></p><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/local-perspectives-on-reconciliation-in-the-western-balkans/">Local Perspectives on Reconciliation in the Western Balkans</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incorporating Gender Perspective in Peace Operations since 2018</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/incorporating-gender-perspective-in-peace-operations-since-2018/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel Gisselquist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Peacekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K4D]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=69511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This rapid literature review collates evidence from academic, policy focussed and grey literature on progress on incorporating gender perspectives in peace operations since 2018, including the deployment of female peacekeepers, and the emerging issues in this field. Key messages that emerge from this review include: The focus on women’s participation in peace processes has led [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/incorporating-gender-perspective-in-peace-operations-since-2018/">Incorporating Gender Perspective in Peace Operations since 2018</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This rapid literature review collates evidence from academic, policy focussed and grey literature on progress on incorporating gender perspectives in peace operations since 2018, including the deployment of female peacekeepers, and the emerging issues in this field. Key messages that emerge from this review include: The focus on women’s participation in peace processes has led to several initiatives and efforts to promote increased representation, the multidimensional nature of the UN’s women, peace, and security (WPS) agenda is illustrative of the complexity of contemporary peace operations. The new and emergent issues in National Action Plans (NAP) on Women, Peace and Security. Critiques of Resolution 1325 suggest that while the resolution provides some examples of what a gender perspective means in the context of a peace agreement, it does not define what it means to apply a gender perspective to peace processes. Gender perspectives are largely absent from peace negotiations. Despite the evolution of this agenda, most contemporary peace processes are still top-down, elite-driven exercises that contribute to marginalisation and exclusion. Whilst there is high-level commitment towards the strategy and what it aims to achieve, institutional barriers, assumptions, and politics undermine its implementation. Key challenges identified in the literature, related to incorporating Gender Perspectives in Peace Operations include. Buy-in from leadership, Mandate and context, Gender and expertise, Terminology, Under-representation of women in peacekeeping. Meaningful participation, Gap between norms and provisions, and Practical/logistical/training issues in implementing the WPS agenda.</p><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/incorporating-gender-perspective-in-peace-operations-since-2018/">Incorporating Gender Perspective in Peace Operations since 2018</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intersecting social inequalities</title>
		<link>https://gsdrc.org/publications/intersecting-social-inequalities/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel Gisselquist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 11:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[K4D]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gsdrc.org/?post_type=publications&#038;p=69505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Analysis of intersecting social inequalities is key to effective, inclusive interventions in crisis settings. Gender equality and social inclusion analytical frameworks provide key research questions and participatory methodologies which seek to understand: Who is excluded? How are they excluded? Why are they excluded? What can be done to address this and support greater inclusion? There [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/intersecting-social-inequalities/">Intersecting social inequalities</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="simple-item-view-description item-page-field-wrapper table">
<div>Analysis of intersecting social inequalities is key to effective, inclusive interventions in crisis settings. Gender equality and social inclusion analytical frameworks provide key research questions and participatory methodologies which seek to understand: Who is excluded? How are they excluded? Why are they excluded? What can be done to address this and support greater inclusion? There is a focus on underlying power dynamics, drivers of marginalisation, and entry points for external support. This rapid review presents a summary of relevant analytical frameworks and good practice for analysing intersecting social inequalities in crisis settings. The focus is on how to undertake contextual analysis of the vulnerabilities and needs of people in crises that are shaped by overlapping and compounding social inequalities, arising from discrimination based on gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity and/or expression and sex characteristics, ethnicity and religion (among other identifiers). The review draws on and presents prior research that identified relevant analytical frameworks, learning and key resources on how to undertake this type of analysis, through a rapid literature search and input by key experts. It summarises a range of frameworks relevant for analysing intersecting social inequalities in crisis settings, developed for various development, humanitarian and peacebuilding objectives. It was harder to find published learning from undertaking this analysis that focuses specifically on crisis settings, but it was possible to draw findings from some individual case studies as well as relevant summaries of learning presented in the analytical frameworks and other guidance materials.</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://gsdrc.org/publications/intersecting-social-inequalities/">Intersecting social inequalities</a> first appeared on <a href="https://gsdrc.org">GSDRC</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
