<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>What would Ronald Reagan say?</title>
	
	<link>http://www.galleryview.org</link>
	<description>"The government is not the solution to our problems, the government is the problem." ... Ronald Reagan</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/GalleryView" /><feedburner:info uri="galleryview" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Paul Harvey’s Words of Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/paul-harveys-words-of-wisdom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/paul-harveys-words-of-wisdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Harvey had many words of wisdom over the decades.  I recently found this one that is definitely worth the listen:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Harvey had many words of wisdom over the decades.  I recently found this one that is definitely worth the listen:</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/H3Az0okaHig" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/paul-harveys-words-of-wisdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN is either ignorant or lying about the delegate count</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/cnn-is-either-ignorant-or-lying-about-the-delegate-count/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/cnn-is-either-ignorant-or-lying-about-the-delegate-count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 03:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a great video about Ron Paul&#8217;s real delegate vote count.  So far, it appears he has won either half or more of the delegates in 8 states.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a great video about Ron Paul&#8217;s real delegate vote count.  So far, it appears he has won either half or more of the delegates in 8 states.</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="243" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/akUZvbHR5BA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/cnn-is-either-ignorant-or-lying-about-the-delegate-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Warming and terrorists</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/global-warming-and-terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/global-warming-and-terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just saw a lot of complaints on the internet about a billboard from Heartland.org that equates global warming believers with terrorists.  In this case, they used the image of the Unabomber from the 90&#8217;s.
Here&#8217;s the image if you haven&#8217;t seen it yet:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw a lot of complaints on the internet about a billboard from Heartland.org that equates global warming believers with terrorists.  In this case, they used the image of the Unabomber from the 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the image if you haven&#8217;t seen it yet:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Heartland-Institute_Billboard-Campaign.jpg" width=450px></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/global-warming-and-terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul versus Paul Krugman</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/ron-paul-versus-paul-krugman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/ron-paul-versus-paul-krugman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 02:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economic meltdown]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Krugman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Krugman is the champion of Keysian economics (the system that has ruined this country since the Great Depression days).  Watch the debate over economic policies in this video.  VERY GOOD STUFF!

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Krugman is the champion of Keysian economics (the system that has ruined this country since the Great Depression days).  Watch the debate over economic policies in this video.  VERY GOOD STUFF!</p>
<p><script src="http://player.ooyala.com/player.js?&#038;callback=customOoyalaPlayerCallback&#038;thruParam_bloomberg-ui[endScreenType]=countdown&#038;playerBrandingId=8a7a9c84ac2f4e8398ebe50c07eb2f9d&#038;autoplay=1&#038;thruParam_bloomberg-ui[countdown]=5&#038;thruParam_bloomberg-ui[popOutButtonVisible]=TRUE&#038;embedCode=1ibGZsNDqsjR5y5tuWu8NXhZ84NC0kJh&#038;width=640&#038;video_pcode=oza2w6q8gX9WSkRx13bskffWIuyf&#038;thruParam_conviva-other[customerId]=c3.Bloomberg&#038;height=360&#038;thruParam_doubleclick[tagUrl]=http://ad.doubleclick.net/pfadx/blp.video/vod/interviews;sz=1x1;tile=1;tp_video=null;dcmt=text/html;ord=165198361639&#038;thruParam_conviva-other[serviceUrl]=http://livepass.conviva.com&#038;hide=all&#038;thruParam_conviva-other[otherTags]=Source|BBweb;Zone|video;cPlay|no&#038;layout=chromeless&#038;wmode=transparent"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/ron-paul-versus-paul-krugman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul is quietly winning delegates and will probably be at the convention</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/ron-paul-is-quietly-winning-delegates-and-will-probably-be-at-the-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/ron-paul-is-quietly-winning-delegates-and-will-probably-be-at-the-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 01:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four months ago, Ron Paul was projected to win the first Iowa caucus vote.  This prompted many high officials to claim that if he did, to ignore the results as they wouldn&#8217;t be valid.  First, Romney was declared a winner, as many fraudulent events seemed to occur.  A few weeks later, Santorum was declared the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four months ago, Ron Paul was projected to win the first Iowa caucus vote.  This prompted many high officials to claim that if he did, to ignore the results as they wouldn&#8217;t be valid.  First, Romney was declared a winner, as many fraudulent events seemed to occur.  A few weeks later, Santorum was declared the winner.  In the end, Ron Paul won at least half the delegates.  He&#8217;s also won at least half or more in Minnesota and Washington state, and many think Maine, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Nevada will follow.  This will make for more than enough to get on the ballot.</p>
<p>Many have pointed out that this is the strategy that Warren G Harding used to go from last place candidate to getting the republican nomination in 1920 to winning the presidency to become the 29th president.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one of many reports on what is going on behind the scenes.</p>
<p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://WXIX.images.worldnow.com/interface/js/WNVideo.js?rnd=779495;hostDomain=www.fox19.com;playerWidth=630;playerHeight=355;isShowIcon=true;clipId=7041758;flvUri=;partnerclipid=;adTag=Education;advertisingZone=;enableAds=true;landingPage=;islandingPageoverride=false;playerType=STANDARD_EMBEDDEDscript;controlsType=overlay'></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/ron-paul-is-quietly-winning-delegates-and-will-probably-be-at-the-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Reserve money is actually colored the same as monopoly money</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/federal-reserve-money-is-actually-colored-the-same-as-monopoly-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/federal-reserve-money-is-actually-colored-the-same-as-monopoly-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economic meltdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most everyone has played the board game monopoly (at least if you are a little older than the current generation of facebook/twitter users, you probably had exposure to the game).  In the past 20 years, I&#8217;ve heard US money being referred to as Monopoly money when someone started talking about the Federal Reserve, fiat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most everyone has played the board game monopoly (at least if you are a little older than the current generation of facebook/twitter users, you probably had exposure to the game).  In the past 20 years, I&#8217;ve heard US money being referred to as Monopoly money when someone started talking about the Federal Reserve, fiat money, and overprinting.</p>
<p>Well, someone figured out that it is actually colored the same as monopoly money.  This is really sad, but true.  Check out this image:</p>
<p><img src="http://imgace.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/monopoly-money.jpg" width=500px></p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t like we didn&#8217;t see this coming (and no, this isn&#8217;t a late April Fool&#8217;s Day joke)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/federal-reserve-money-is-actually-colored-the-same-as-monopoly-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Etch-a-sketch?  Ad ad that puts it all into perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/etch-a-sketch-ad-ad-that-puts-it-all-into-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/etch-a-sketch-ad-ad-that-puts-it-all-into-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if he&#8217;s not going to win, you have to admire his campaign ads:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if he&#8217;s not going to win, you have to admire his campaign ads:</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/d5pLrwINs1o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/etch-a-sketch-ad-ad-that-puts-it-all-into-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So, why was Bush blamed anytime gas prices went up, but Obama has no control over gas prices?</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/so-why-was-bush-blamed-anytime-gas-prices-went-up-but-obama-has-no-control-over-gas-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/so-why-was-bush-blamed-anytime-gas-prices-went-up-but-obama-has-no-control-over-gas-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems rather hypocritical of the media to imply that Bush directly or indirectly had anything to do with high gas prices, but Obama is completely without blame.
Gas prices averaged about $1.80 the day of Obama&#8217;s inauguration (when he flubbed his oath).  Today, we are seeing some parts of the country heading to $5 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems rather hypocritical of the media to imply that Bush directly or indirectly had anything to do with high gas prices, but Obama is completely without blame.</p>
<p>Gas prices averaged about $1.80 the day of Obama&#8217;s inauguration (when he flubbed his oath).  Today, we are seeing some parts of the country heading to $5 and $6 per gallon.</p>
<p><img src="http://l1.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120313/gas.uni.jpg"></p>
<p>The issue helped democrats get control of congress in 2006 and Obama in 2008.  Now, it&#8217;s coming back to bite them in the rear.  Check out this video:</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qKdScVerrBU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>This administration actually wants high gas prices in order to push alternative sources and get people into hybrids and electric cars (like the failed, explosive-prone Volt).  Check out energy secretary Chu&#8217;s remarks about it:</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RrcGRljKHnI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Just remember that the Obama administration imposed a moratorium on American drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico (even though they helped south american countries establish rigs there), even defying federal judges who said they couldn&#8217;t ban all drilling.  This reduced our supply of oil as well as putting 10s of thousands out of work.  Then, there was the recent pipeline from Canada that they intentionally halted, further squeezing supply.</p>
<p>They want higher prices.  Check out this video:</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ma1gwZYw1cY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s evil plans are working and he wants another 4 years to do even more.</p>
<p><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_RaxQOMkISCg/TN4Se5UFoBI/AAAAAAAAEto/YbkKSANwQ-M/s1600/obama+laughing.jpg"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/so-why-was-bush-blamed-anytime-gas-prices-went-up-but-obama-has-no-control-over-gas-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government’s objective: Make everything illegal</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/governments-objective-make-everything-illegal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/governments-objective-make-everything-illegal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember reading a quote from Ayn Rand&#8217;s book &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; about making everyone guilty of breaking some crime by creating laws against everything.  Check it out:
&#8220;There&#8217;s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren&#8217;t enough criminals, one makes them. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading a quote from Ayn Rand&#8217;s book &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; about making everyone guilty of breaking some crime by creating laws against everything.  Check it out:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There&#8217;s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren&#8217;t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What&#8217;s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kinds of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted - and you create a nation of lawbreakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now that&#8217;s the system, Mr. Rearden, that&#8217;s the game, and once you understand it, you&#8217;ll be much easier to deal with.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And then this report from Foxnews about everything being illegal in America these days.  Very scary stuff.</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nBiJB8YuDBQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>This is what you get when government gets big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/governments-objective-make-everything-illegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When it comes to taxes, the left never learns</title>
		<link>http://www.galleryview.org/when-it-comes-to-taxes-the-left-never-learns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.galleryview.org/when-it-comes-to-taxes-the-left-never-learns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galleryview.org/?p=1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 60&#8217;s John F Kennedy pushed Congress to lower the tax rates across board and this produced an economic boom at the time. (Too bad his executive order to replace Federal Reserve notes with debt-free United States, silver-backed notes fell apart after his death, else we&#8217;d really have a boom still going today).
In the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 60&#8217;s John F Kennedy pushed Congress to lower the tax rates across board and this produced an economic boom at the time. (Too bad his executive order to replace Federal Reserve notes with debt-free United States, silver-backed notes fell apart after his death, else we&#8217;d really have a boom still going today).</p>
<p>In the 80&#8217;s, Ronald Reagan and a Republican Congress, along with a reluctant Democrat House pushed through a series of tax reductions that led to a boom that lasted longer than any post WWII (yes, longer than the 3 year boom during the Dot Com era).</p>
<p>In the 90&#8217;s, the Republican congress squeaked through a minor tax cut on Capital Gains which partially led to the stock market boom.</p>
<p>In the early 2000&#8217;s, W was able to get Congress to go along with income tax rate reductions which led to the US pulling out of the recession that started at the end of the Clinton term and bottomed after 9/11.</p>
<p>In 2010 Obama was forced to avoid the raising of the tax rates back to Clinton levels in order to prevent the Great Obama Democrat Depression (what it should be called, not the great recession) from getting worse.</p>
<p>The left thinks that all you have to do is raise tax rates and the money will flow and the government will be in nirvana.  The reality has been proven over and over that people keeping their own hard-earned money has a greater, longer lasting positive result than the government taking more and then handing out one-time measly stimulus checks or funneling money to unions.</p>
<p>Another example took place recently in the UK.  A 50% tax rate on the wealthiest took place last year <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/tax/9097219/50p-tax-rate-failing-to-boost-revenues.html">and the numbers are in:  Revenue dropped.</a>   Raising rates harms the economy.  It produces less revenue over time as the economy shrinks and unemployment rises.</p>
<p>But will they learn?  Nope, they&#8217;ll just blame blame blame.  They&#8217;ll say that the rich hid it or committed crimes, etc.</p>
<p>Same old story&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.galleryview.org/when-it-comes-to-taxes-the-left-never-learns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

