<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Gemma Petrie</title>
<meta name="description" content="Gemma Petrie is a Principal Researcher in Chicago exploring the intersection of people, society, and technology.">
<link rel="icon" type="image/svg+xml" href="images/favicon.svg"><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="images/favicon.png">
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com"><link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.gstatic.com" crossorigin>
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=DM+Sans:wght@400;500;700&family=Young+Serif&display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css?v=86afe0ce">
<link rel="canonical" href="https://gemmapetrie.com/">
<meta property="og:type" content="website">
<meta property="og:site_name" content="Gemma Petrie">
<meta property="og:title" content="Gemma Petrie">
<meta property="og:description" content="Gemma Petrie is a Principal Researcher in Chicago exploring the intersection of people, society, and technology.">
<meta property="og:url" content="https://gemmapetrie.com/">
<meta property="og:image" content="https://gemmapetrie.com/images/og.jpg">
<meta property="og:image:width" content="1200"><meta property="og:image:height" content="630">
<meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
</head>
<body class="home">
<a class="skip" href="#content">Skip to content</a>
<header class="wrap top">
  <a class="brand" href="index.html">Gemma Petrie</a>
  <nav aria-label="Main"><a href="publications.html">Publications</a><a href="speaking.html">Speaking</a><a href="writing/index.html">Writing</a><a href="recipes/index.html">Recipes</a><a href="about.html">About</a><a href="contact.html">Contact</a></nav>
</header>
<main id="content" class="wrap" tabindex="-1">

<section class="hero">
  <h1>I <span class="u">research</span> how design and platform conditions shape people’s choices and experiences with technology.</h1>
  <div class="wr"><div class="ph"><img src="images/portrait.jpg" alt="Gemma Petrie" width="1000" height="1000"></div></div>
</section>
<section class="bio">
  <p>I’m Gemma Petrie (she/her), a Principal Researcher in Chicago, exploring the intersection of people, society, and technology. My work focuses on understanding how technology and design impact people’s lives and how research can inform policy and regulation.</p>
  <p>I lead competition and regulation research for <a class="m" href="https://research.mozilla.org/browser-competition/">Mozilla</a>. Previously, I led the <a class="m" href="https://www.firefox.com/">Firefox</a> User Research Team.</p>
</section>
<section class="sw"><div class="sw-head"><h2>Selected work</h2><a href="publications.html">Publications →</a></div><div class="sw-grid"><a class="sw-card" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/internet-policy/uk-cma-browser-choice-screens/"><h3>UK CMA and Consumer Choice</h3><p>The UK CMA has proposed Google search choice screens but has not yet consulted on browser choice screens. Mozilla calls on the CMA to test and launch the two together. Doing so would avoid delaying browser choice and would reduce user confusion between browsers and search that research has documented.</p></a><a class="sw-card" href="https://www.nber.org/papers/w35112"><h3>Active Choice Interventions at Scale</h3><p>Browser choice screens required by the DMA increased Firefox daily active users by 91% on iOS and 13% on Android, evidence that regulation can help independent browsers compete.</p></a><a class="sw-card" href="https://research.mozilla.org/competition-remedies-are-too-important-to-be-left-untested/"><h3>Designing Better Digital Competition Remedies</h3><p>Case studies from Mozilla’s competition research on how concept testing, usability testing, and behavioral experiments can strengthen the design of regulatory remedies.</p></a><a class="sw-card" href="https://research.mozilla.org/browser-competition/choicescreen"><h3>Can Browser Choice Screens Be Effective?</h3><p>A 12,000-person experiment in Germany, Spain, and Poland found that browser choice screens can be an effective intervention for challenging pre-set defaults, but their design, content, and timing are critical to how well they work.</p></a><a class="sw-card" href="https://doi.org/10.1111/epic.12003"><h3>Who Gets to Define Success?</h3><p>Diary studies, interviews, and workshops with 61 people in six cities found that people value Firefox Focus as a companion to another browser, for specific tasks like sensitive searches and quick one-off lookups. The findings influenced how Mozilla defines success for products like Focus, beyond the size of their user base.</p></a><a class="sw-card" href="https://www.epicpeople.org/theory-in-design-research/"><h3>In Praise of Theory in Design Research</h3><p>In a six-country browser study, people saved and organized things with familiar tools like email, screenshots, and open tabs, not purpose-built apps, and these solutions worked well for them. Lévi-Strauss’s concept of bricolage challenges the idea that people want custom-built tools or engineered workflows.</p></a></div></section>
</main>
<footer class="site-footer"><div class="wrap"><span>© Gemma Petrie<noscript> · gemmapetrie [at] gmail [dot] com</noscript></span><nav aria-label="Footer"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/gemmapetrie/">LinkedIn</a><a href="contact.html">Contact</a></nav></div></footer>
<script>document.querySelectorAll("a[data-u]").forEach(function(a){a.addEventListener("click",function(e){e.preventDefault();location.href="mail"+"to:"+a.dataset.u+"@"+a.dataset.d;});});</script>
</body>
</html>
