Comments for Genuine Evaluation

Comment on The Friday Funny: Challenge, pressure, and performance by Michael Scriven

Michael Scriven — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:51:58 +0000

EVALUATION: Evaluate everything. You may use a random sample, but only if you can prove it is random, comprehensive, adequately sized, and uses verstehen wherever appropriate. Grading is 33% for concision, 33% for coverage, 33% for methodology, and 1% for validity.

Comment on The Friday Funny – every presentation by David Onder

David Onder — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:36:23 +0000

Unfortunately, when I click on this video, it says the video is private.

Bummer…

Comment on The Friday Funny – every presentation by Stephanie Evergreen

Stephanie Evergreen — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:07:19 +0000

My favorite part is the forgotten fourth bullet point. Cracks me up.

Comment on Evaluation on autopilot – Environment Protection Agency,Victoria by Gabriel Della-Piana

Gabriel Della-Piana — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:18:16 +0000

EPA could do more and beachgoers could do more.
EPA could report that when they have no data the beachgoers should keep in mind
that beach conditions could be dangerous under conditions such as storms in which debris could bring in pollution, etc. etc.

Beachgoers, alerted to such lapses, could set up their own checking system.

Comment on The Friday Funny – which one of these two is the evaluator? by Jane Davidson

Jane Davidson — Sun, 18 Dec 2011 07:27:16 +0000

I thought Katherine Dawes’ comment on twitter was a cute answer too:
“Harry = experimental, Charlie = summative”
@KD_eval