<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GeoNames Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geonames.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">197883</site><cloud domain='geonames.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
<source:cloud xmlns:source='https://source.scripting.com/'>https://geonames.wordpress.com/?rsscloud=notify</source:cloud>

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="https://geonames.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="GeoNames Blog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='https://geonames.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
	<item>
		<title>GeoNames Ontology 3.4</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2026/10/25/geonames-ontology-3-4/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2026/10/25/geonames-ontology-3-4/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[semanticweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sparql]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Version 3.4 of the GeoNames ontology is published. Every RDF document now carries the name of a feature as stored in the GeoNames database, features in countries with a fifth level of administrative divisions link to that parent, and the list of feature codes is up to date with the data. Nothing existing changes: the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Version 3.4 of the GeoNames ontology is published. Every RDF document now carries the name of a feature as stored in the GeoNames database, features in countries with a fifth level of administrative divisions link to that parent, and the list of feature codes is up to date with the data. Nothing existing changes: the version is additive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is new</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The toponym name.</strong> The XML and JSON output of the webservices has always had two names for a feature: <code>toponymName</code>, the name stored in the GeoNames database, and <code>name</code>, the name in the requested language. The RDF documents had only <code>gn:name</code>, the name in the language. The new property <code>gn:toponymName</code> closes that gap. It carries the name as recorded in the database, without a language tag. For counties the difference is easy to see:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><th>Feature</th><th><code>gn:toponymName</code></th><th><code>gn:name</code></th></tr><tr><td><a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://sws.geonames.org/4758041/about.rdf">Fairfax County</a></td><td>Fairfax County</td><td>Fairfax</td></tr><tr><td><a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://sws.geonames.org/4791271/about.rdf">City of Virginia Beach</a></td><td>City of Virginia Beach</td><td>Virginia Beach</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The property is in every document: the feature itself, the children, the neighbours and the nearby features.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>A fifth level of parents.</strong> Features in countries with a fifth level of administrative divisions now link to that parent with <code>gn:parentADM5</code>, next to <code>gn:parentADM1</code> to <code>gn:parentADM4</code>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Feature codes up to date.</strong> The ontology now has the 19 feature codes of the current list that it lacked, among them the historical fifth-order division (A.ADM5H), apartment building (S.BLDA) and grove (V.GROVE). The 25 codes that are neither in the list nor in use are marked as deprecated, not removed, so that old data still resolves. The English texts of 8 codes follow the current list, and the Swedish, Norwegian and Russian labels were brought in line with the feature code files in the download.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>One licence.</strong> The ontology is now licensed under CC BY 4.0, like the data. The Creative Commons prefix in the file also points to the official namespace, and the import of a vocabulary that is no longer online was removed, which makes the ontology load faster in tools that follow imports.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">If you already use the RDF</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nothing breaks. The namespace of the properties is unchanged, no property or code was removed or renamed, and <code>gn:name</code> carries the same value as before. The earlier versions of the ontology stay online.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Queries that read <code>gn:name</code> keep working. If you want the stored name, read <code>gn:toponymName</code>.</li>



<li>Deprecated codes are still in the file, with <code>owl:deprecated</code> and, for two of them, a pointer to the code that replaces them. A tool that lists all codes sees 25 more entries marked as deprecated.</li>



<li>The licence statement of the ontology changed from CC BY 3.0 to CC BY 4.0 from this version on; the older versions keep the licence they were published with.</li>



<li>An alignment with GeoSPARQL is a possible next step. It would be a version of its own, since it changes the RDF of every feature.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Links</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.geonames.org/ontology/ontology_v3.4.rdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ontology_v3.4.rdf</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.geonames.org/ontology/documentation.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Documentation and version history</a></li>



<li><a href="https://sws.geonames.org/4758041/about.rdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">An example document</a>: Fairfax County</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2026/10/25/geonames-ontology-3-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">498</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Northern Cyprus &#8211; The Complex Reality of Internet Geolocation</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2023/12/20/northern-cyprus-the-complex-reality-of-internet-geolocation/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2023/12/20/northern-cyprus-the-complex-reality-of-internet-geolocation/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limassol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turkey]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Geolocation plays a crucial role in determining the online experience for users. However, this system is not without its challenges, as exemplified by the case of Northern Cyprus. This region, while legally recognized as part of Cyprus, faces a unique dilemma when it comes to online identification. Northern Cyprus, situated on the island of Cyprus, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geolocation plays a crucial role in determining the online experience for users. However, this system is not without its challenges, as exemplified by the case of Northern Cyprus. This region, while legally recognized as part of Cyprus, faces a unique dilemma when it comes to online identification.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Northern Cyprus, situated on the island of Cyprus, is officially recognized as part of the Republic of Cyprus. However, the de facto situation is markedly different, with Turkey exerting influence and control over the region. This dual status has significant implications for the internet experience of those residing in Northern Cyprus.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png"><img width="1024" height="817" data-attachment-id="489" data-permalink="https://geonames.wordpress.com/2023/12/20/northern-cyprus-the-complex-reality-of-internet-geolocation/northern-cyprus/" data-orig-file="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png" data-orig-size="1522,1215" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-title="northern-cyprus" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png?w=809" src="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png?w=1024" alt="" class="wp-image-489" srcset="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png?w=1024 1024w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png?w=150 150w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png?w=300 300w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png?w=768 768w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png?w=1440 1440w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png 1522w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At Geonames, we acknowledge the complexities surrounding Northern Cyprus and its online identification. In response to user concerns and to better reflect the on-the-ground reality, we have updated our database. The feature now carries the country code TR (Turkey) with a secondary code CY (Cyprus), accompanied by carefully defined boundaries.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the major challenges faced by individuals in Northern Cyprus is the misidentification of their location by IP locators. Despite the de facto situation aligning them more closely with Turkey, many geolocation services identify them solely as being in Cyprus. This discrepancy can impact various aspects of their online experience, from accessing region-specific content to encountering challenges with online services that depend on accurate location data. As most IP location service are based on Geonames data the recent update will help improve the result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2023/12/20/northern-cyprus-the-complex-reality-of-internet-geolocation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">487</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/northern-cyprus.png?w=1024" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>St. or Saint ?</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2023/11/03/st-or-saint/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2023/11/03/st-or-saint/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 10:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was recently asked whether we could harmonize the usage of St. and Saint. We do use both and have places with the main toponym name starting with St. and others starting with Saint. Examples are St. Louis and Saint Paul, Minnesota. As it turns out wikipedia makes this same distinction and uses St for [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I was recently asked whether we could harmonize the usage of <em>St.</em> and <em>Saint</em>. We do use both and have places with the main toponym name starting with <em>St</em>. and others starting with <em>Saint</em>. <br>Examples are <a href="https://www.geonames.org/4407066/st-louis.html">St. Louis</a> and <a href="https://www.geonames.org/5045360/saint-paul.html">Saint Paul, Minnesota</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As it turns out wikipedia makes this same distinction and uses St for <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Louis">St. Louis</a> and Saint for <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Paul%2C_Minnesota">Saint Paul</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When checking google trends to see what is used in searches we also encounter the same pattern. While <em>St</em> is used more often when searching for St. Louis, <em>Saint</em> is used more likely when searching for Saint Paul.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png" rel="https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=Saint%20Paul%20Minnesota,St%20Paul%20Minnesota"><img width="1024" height="580" data-attachment-id="479" data-permalink="https://geonames.wordpress.com/2023/11/03/st-or-saint/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends-google-com_/" data-orig-file="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png" data-orig-size="1689,957" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-title="opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png?w=809" src="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png?w=1024" alt="" class="wp-image-479" srcset="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png?w=1024 1024w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png?w=150 150w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png?w=300 300w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png?w=768 768w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png?w=1440 1440w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png 1689w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png"><img width="1024" height="578" data-attachment-id="480" data-permalink="https://geonames.wordpress.com/2023/11/03/st-or-saint/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends-google-com_/" data-orig-file="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png" data-orig-size="1682,950" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-title="opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png?w=809" src="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png?w=1024" alt="" class="wp-image-480" srcset="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png?w=1024 1024w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png?w=150 150w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png?w=300 300w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png?w=768 768w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png?w=1440 1440w, https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png 1682w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Considering the usage of both <em>St</em>. and <em>Saint </em>I think we should not harmonize, but rather use what is commonly used for the particular place.  We should respect different usage for different places and not try to force a harmonized standard on it. Be it <em>St</em>. or <em>Saint</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2023/11/03/st-or-saint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">475</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110737_trends.google.com_.png?w=1024" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="https://geonames.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/opera-momentaufnahme_2023-11-03_110607_trends.google.com_.png?w=1024" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Addresses for France finally open</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2020/03/08/addresses-for-france-finally-open/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2020/03/08/addresses-for-france-finally-open/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2020 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=464</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At the beginning of this year the addresses for France have become finally available as open data under the French IO license compatible with CC-BY. The data has been downloadable for a couple of years at no cost, but unfortunately under a restricted share-alike license. It is very good news that the understanding that share-alike [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of this year the <a href="https://adresse.data.gouv.fr">addresses for France</a> have become finally available as open data under the <a href="https://www.etalab.gouv.fr/licence-ouverte-open-licence">French IO license</a> compatible with CC-BY.<br />
The data has been downloadable for a couple of years at no cost, but unfortunately under a restricted share-alike license. It is very good news that the understanding that share-alike is quite the contrary of open has won ground and made the French government change the license strategy.</p>
<p><em>Néanmoins, je considère que la constitution d’une base adresse nationale gratuite et unifiée est un enjeu important pour l’économie française ainsi que pour la chaîne de décision publique (gestion de crise, gestion des équipements, etc.) et doit constituer une priorité pour la transformation de l’Etat. [<a href="https://www.ccomptes.fr/sites/default/files/2019-03/20190311-refere-S2018-3287-valorisation-donnees-IGN-Meteo-France-Cerema-rep-PM.pdf">réponse du Premier Ministre, 4 Mars 2019</a>]<br />
</em></p>
<p>The new address data is available in the geonames api for the <a href="https://www.geonames.org/maps/addresses.html#address">address services</a>:<br />
<strong>geoCodeAddress</strong> it retrieves the lat/lng for a given street:<br />
<a href="http://api.geonames.org/geoCodeAddress?q=67+Avenue+Simon+Bolivar&#038;username=demo" rel="nofollow">http://api.geonames.org/geoCodeAddress?q=67+Avenue+Simon+Bolivar&#038;username=demo</a></p>
<p>The reverse geocoding service <strong>address</strong> returns the next address for a given lat/lng:<br />
<a href="http://api.geonames.org/address?lat=48.87636&#038;lng=2.37728&#038;username=demo" rel="nofollow">http://api.geonames.org/address?lat=48.87636&#038;lng=2.37728&#038;username=demo</a></p>
<p>The <strong>streetNameLookup</strong> allows for user friendly input forms.<br />
You can make a request to the server to get all streets beginning with the letters typed by the user:<br />
<a href="http://api.geonames.org/streetNameLookupJSON?q=Avenue%20Simon&#038;username=demo&#038;formatted=true&#038;country=FR" rel="nofollow">http://api.geonames.org/streetNameLookupJSON?q=Avenue%20Simon&#038;username=demo&#038;formatted=true&#038;country=FR</a></p>
<p>With this new addition the number of <a href="https://www.geonames.org/maps/addresses.html#countries">countries supported by the address services</a> has increased to 28.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2020/03/08/addresses-for-france-finally-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">464</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic Names with new From/To field</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2018/04/03/historic-names-with-new-from-to-field/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2018/04/03/historic-names-with-new-from-to-field/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To improve coverage and handling for historic names the GeoNames alternatenames table has two new fields &#8216;from&#8216; and &#8216;to&#8216;. The two fields allow adding a string describing the period when the name was used. The main use case is for historic names but current names may also have the &#8216;from&#8216; field filled to indicate since [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To improve coverage and handling for historic names the GeoNames alternatenames table has two new fields &#8216;<strong>from</strong>&#8216; and &#8216;<strong>to</strong>&#8216;. The two fields allow adding a string describing the period when the name was used. The main use case is for historic names but current names may also have the &#8216;<strong>from</strong>&#8216; field filled to indicate since when the current name is in use.</p>
<p>So far the fields only contain years. The data type string, however, allows to express other information as well. Like &#8217;14uu&#8217; to express the fourteenth century or &#8216;197u&#8217; to describe the seventies. We don&#8217;t want to invent our own standard to describe uncertainty and will use the ISO 8601 standard once it will be published. The ISO 8601 will supersede the library of congress <strong>Extended Date/Time Format</strong> (EDTF ) draft.</p>
<p>Some examples:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geonames.org/1642911/jakarta.html">Jakarta</a> has the following alternatenames with the fields filled:</p>
<ul>
<li>Sunda Kelapa 397-1527</li>
<li>Jayakarta 1527-1619</li>
<li>Batavia 1619-1949</li>
<li>Djakarta 1949-1972</li>
<li>Jakarta 1972-</li>
</ul>
<p>The German city <a href="http://www.geonames.org/2940132/chemnitz.html">Chemnitz </a>was called Karl-Marx-Stadt from 1953 till 1990. <a href="http://www.geonames.org/1275339/mumbai.html">Mumbai </a>was called Bombay in English till 1995.</p>
<p>To export the two new fields a new file alternatenamesV2 is now available in the download directory. The file is the same as the now obsolete file alternatenames, with two additional columns. The two files will exists for some time in parallel to allow users to change their import scripts.</p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/" rel="nofollow">http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2018/04/03/historic-names-with-new-from-to-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">462</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Map Layout</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2013/06/26/new-map-layout/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2013/06/26/new-map-layout/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=443</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After many years without major changes to the GeoNames Map Interface it was time for an update. The new Map Interface makes full use of the screen for the map view. Other information is displayed on top of the map. The GeoNames gazetteer layer can now be displayed together with the wikipedia mashup. Boundingboxes and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><figure style="width: 480px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.geonames.org/img/blog/mapv3.png" alt="screenshot new map" width="480" height="287" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">New GeoNames Map Interface</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>After many years without major changes to the GeoNames Map Interface it was time for an update. The new Map Interface makes full use of the screen for the map view. Other information is displayed on top of the map. The GeoNames gazetteer layer can now be displayed together with the wikipedia mashup. Boundingboxes and polygon boundaries are displayed where available and when associated with a GeoName feature. The bounding box is derived from the polygon information or from bounding boxes of children features. For populated places without polygon information the bounding box is derived from population number and feature code.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a title="Christophe Boutreux" href="http://boutreux.com/">Christophe </a>for the implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2013/06/26/new-map-layout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">443</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.geonames.org/img/blog/mapv3.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">screenshot new map</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improved SRTM Digital Elevation Data</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/improved-srtm-digital-elevation-data/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/improved-srtm-digital-elevation-data/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital elevation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[srtm data]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GeoNames is switching from the original SRTM data provided by NASA to the processed srtm v4.1 data provided by cgiar. The extract files now contain srtm data where available and gtopo30 elsewhere. SRTM is digital elevation model from 56° S to 60° N in a three arcsecond (90 m) resolution. The original data provided by NASA contains [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cgiar-csi.org/"><img loading="lazy" class="alignnone" title="CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.geonames.org/img/blog/cgiar-logo.png" alt="" width="480" height="105" /></a></p>
<p>GeoNames is switching from the <a href="http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/">original SRTM data</a> provided by NASA to the processed <a href="http://www.cgiar-csi.org/data/elevation/item/45-srtm-90m-digital-elevation-database-v41">srtm v4.1 data provided by cgiar</a>. The extract files now contain srtm data where available and gtopo30 elsewhere.</p>
<p>SRTM is digital elevation model from 56° S to 60° N in a three arcsecond (90 m) resolution. The original data provided by <a title="srtm original" href="http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/">NASA </a>contains small holes of no data over water bodies, mountainous regions and desertic regions. Andy Jarvis and Edward Guevara of the CIAT Agroecosystems Resilience project (CGIAR), Hannes Isaak Reuter (JRC-IES-LMNH) and Andy Nelson (JRC-IES-GEM) have further processed the original DEMs to fill in these no-data voids. This involved the production of vector contours and points, and the re-interpolation of these derived contours back into a raster DEM.  The <a href="http://www.cgiar.org/">Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research</a> (CGIAR) is a global partnership that unites organizations engaged in research for sustainable development to reduce poverty and hunger, improve human health and nutrition, and enhance ecosystem resilience.</p>
<p>GeoNames has been kindly granted permission to use the processed srtm data. In exchange CGIAR has been given complimentary access to the premium web services. Thanks to Andy Jarvis and all the others involved.</p>
<p><figure style="width: 480px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" class=" " title="srtm3 elevation for N46 E8" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.geonames.org/img/blog/srtm3_s_N46E008.png" alt="" width="480" height="480" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">srtm3 elevation for N46 E8 in the Swiss Alps &#8211; void areas in red</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><figure style="width: 480px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" class=" " title="srtm3 v4.1 N46 E8" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.geonames.org/img/blog/srtm3v4_s_N46E008.png" alt="" width="480" height="480" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">srtm3 v4.1 N46 E8 in the Swiss Alps &#8211; no data voids filled by cgiar</figcaption></figure></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/improved-srtm-digital-elevation-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">399</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.geonames.org/img/blog/cgiar-logo.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.geonames.org/img/blog/srtm3_s_N46E008.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">srtm3 elevation for N46 E8</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.geonames.org/img/blog/srtm3v4_s_N46E008.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">srtm3 v4.1 N46 E8</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Sudan Country Codes</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/south-sudan-country-codes/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/south-sudan-country-codes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ISO has published the country codes for South Sudan. As expected in our blog posting it is SS. The letter codes for Sudan remain the same, whereas the numeric code for Sudan was changed from 736 to 729. ISO Alpha-2 ISO Alpha-3 ISO Numeric US BGN* Sudan  SD  SDN  729  SU South Sudan  SS  SSD [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.iso.org/">ISO</a> has <a href="http://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes/updates_on_iso_3166.htm">published</a> the country codes for <strong>South Sudan</strong>. As expected in <a href="https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/republic-of-south-sudan/">our blog posting</a> it is <strong>SS</strong>. The letter codes for <strong>Sudan</strong> remain the same, whereas the numeric code for <strong>Sudan</strong> was changed from 736 to 729.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>ISO Alpha-2</th>
<th>ISO Alpha-3</th>
<th>ISO Numeric</th>
<th>US BGN*</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.geonames.org/countries/SD/sudan.html">Sudan</a></strong></td>
<td> SD</td>
<td> SDN</td>
<td> 729</td>
<td> SU</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong><a href="http://www.geonames.org/countries/SS/south-sudan.html">South Sudan</a></strong></td>
<td> SS</td>
<td> SSD</td>
<td> 728</td>
<td> OD</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* <small>US BGN=Formerly FIPS PUB 10-4</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/south-sudan-country-codes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">381</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republic of South Sudan</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/republic-of-south-sudan/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/republic-of-south-sudan/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[South Sudan became an independent state on 9 July 2011. The new country has received geonameid 7909807. ISO has not yet assigned a country code and we temporarily use the country code XS. It will be changed to the official code as soon as ISO assigns a code to the new country. The ISO code [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="South Sudan GeoNames Feature" href="http://www.geonames.org/7909807/south-sudan.html" target="_blank"><img loading="lazy" class="alignleft" title="Flag South Sudan" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.geonames.org/img/blog/200px-flag-south-sudan.png" alt="Flag South Sudan" width="200" height="100" /></a><br />
<strong><a href="http://www.goss.org/">South Sudan</a></strong> became an independent state on 9 July 2011.<br />
The new country has received geonameid <a href="http://www.geonames.org/7909807/south-sudan.html">7909807</a>. <a href="http://www.iso.org/">ISO</a> has not yet assigned a <a href="http://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes/iso-3166-1_decoding_table.htm">country code</a> and we temporarily use the country code <em>XS</em>. It will be changed to the official code as soon as ISO assigns a code to the new country. The ISO code is expected to be SS.  The <strong>Republic of South Sudan</strong> is not the only country in the <a href="http://www.geonames.org">GeoNames</a> database with a temporary country code. The other temporary country code <a href="https://geonames.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/xk-country-code-for-kosovo/">XK stands for Kosovo</a>.<br />
The features of South Sudan have been updated with the temporary country<br />
code.<br />
Sudan had 25 ADM1 before the independence of the south. 15 ADM1 remain<br />
with Sudan, 10 states are now the ADM1 of South Sudan which formerly composed the provinces of Equatoria (Central Equatoria, Eastern Equatoria, and Western Equatoria); Bahr el Ghazal (Northern Bahr el Ghazal, Western Bahr el Ghazal, Lakes, and Warrap); and Upper Nile (Jonglei, Unity, and Upper Nile).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/republic-of-south-sudan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">367</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.geonames.org/img/blog/200px-flag-south-sudan.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Flag South Sudan</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historical place names</title>
		<link>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/historical-place-names/</link>
					<comments>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/historical-place-names/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geonames.wordpress.com/?p=355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Improving the way GeoNames handles historical names is a popular feature request. GeoNames is now beginning to address this question. There are two new flags in the alternate name edit tool: isHistoric for names of the past that are no longer used. isColloquial for slang and colloquial names At the recent Annual Meeting of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Improving the way GeoNames handles historical names is a popular <a href="http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/112.page">feature </a><a href="http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1242.page">request</a>. GeoNames is now beginning to address this question.</p>
<p>There are two new flags in the alternate name edit tool:<br />
<strong>isHistoric </strong>for names of the past that are no longer used.<br />
<strong>isColloquial </strong>for slang and colloquial names</p>
<p>At the recent Annual Meeting of the <a href="http://www.aag.org/">Association of American Geographers</a> is was discussed how GeoNames could be extended to improve support for the timeline. Some attributes under consideration:<br />
&#8211; fromPeriod (date, year, decade, century or period of usage)<br />
&#8211; toPeriod<br />
&#8211; source (book or map where the name is used), publication date of the source<br />
&#8211; notes</p>
<p>The discussion for these fields is still ongoing and any feedback is welcome.<br />
The two new flags <strong>isColloquial </strong>and <strong>isHistoric </strong>are not yet included in the daily extract as we will probably add some more attributes and don&#8217;t want to change the extract files too often. Each change in the extact files breaks the import scripts of users. We will extract the records with the two new flags in separate files as a temporary workaround till everything is stable. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geonames.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/historical-place-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">355</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d20c2422de0cf352882d084ed8f9d0ec9b8977b0a86e501fbb3890de8ce67634?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">marc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
