<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" xml:lang="en-gb">


<title>Geophysics Forum</title>
<subtitle>Explore the myth underground, underwater and behind walls ...</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.detectation.com/index.php" />
<updated>2012-02-09T21:26:23-04:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[Geophysics Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/feed.php</id>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/GeophysicsForum" /><feedburner:info uri="geophysicsforum" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[xyz]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-09T21:26:23-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-09T21:26:23-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1431&amp;p=3919#p3919</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/8hZBa_EZ79U/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Re: Ohmmapper for bedrock delineation]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1431&amp;p=3919#p3919">
A Ohmmapper survey can be done much faster than a DC electrical resistivity survey, but it has limitations on where you can use it. OhmMapper has limited penetration depth (in general 30 feet?), especially with electrically conductive soils.&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=252"&gt;xyz&lt;/a&gt; — Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:26 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jmMzMaNDJKx-s_uxbLzXeujS_y8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jmMzMaNDJKx-s_uxbLzXeujS_y8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jmMzMaNDJKx-s_uxbLzXeujS_y8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jmMzMaNDJKx-s_uxbLzXeujS_y8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/8hZBa_EZ79U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1431&amp;p=3919#p3919</feedburner:origLink></entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[nsm]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-09T21:19:05-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-09T21:19:05-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1430&amp;p=3918#p3918</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/XSTi6t8Xct0/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Re: Hyperbola Flattening Transform]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1430&amp;p=3918#p3918">
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;cite&gt;eric2009 wrote:&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can it be used to detect underground pipes?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sure. Usually a pipe is much easier to identify since you can go parallel paths to confirm it. In this case, human eyes are good enough to identify them so there are not much interests in auto-detecting them yet.&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=1039"&gt;nsm&lt;/a&gt; — Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:19 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NmIEbmP4ms73KrCw_nJatsPRvHk/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NmIEbmP4ms73KrCw_nJatsPRvHk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NmIEbmP4ms73KrCw_nJatsPRvHk/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NmIEbmP4ms73KrCw_nJatsPRvHk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/XSTi6t8Xct0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1430&amp;p=3918#p3918</feedburner:origLink></entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[eric2009]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-09T19:18:45-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-09T19:18:45-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1430&amp;p=3917#p3917</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/2Rul_rpzR3o/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Re: Hyperbola Flattening Transform]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1430&amp;p=3917#p3917">
Can it be used to detect underground pipes?&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=218"&gt;eric2009&lt;/a&gt; — Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:18 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ERhBoqHFYUG5AuDUCUBiqdscr7Q/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ERhBoqHFYUG5AuDUCUBiqdscr7Q/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ERhBoqHFYUG5AuDUCUBiqdscr7Q/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ERhBoqHFYUG5AuDUCUBiqdscr7Q/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/2Rul_rpzR3o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1430&amp;p=3917#p3917</feedburner:origLink></entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[tgolooe]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-09T14:39:02-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-09T14:39:02-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1431&amp;p=3916#p3916</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/d-H0ZPoSDWs/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Ohmmapper for bedrock delineation]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1431&amp;p=3916#p3916">
We need to delineate the bedrock/overlaying soil interface to track fluid migration paths for a site. Usually we hire geophysical consulting companies to conduct resistivity and seismic surveys. The services are expensive and usually we have to choose where to do the survey lines for the best results. Is ohmmapper a better choice for this kind of surveys? Is the survey speed faster and its results are comparable to those of resistivity and seismic surveys?&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=126"&gt;tgolooe&lt;/a&gt; — Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:39 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m4i3dZt98GxJZfsmv7URKiMbHH8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m4i3dZt98GxJZfsmv7URKiMbHH8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m4i3dZt98GxJZfsmv7URKiMbHH8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m4i3dZt98GxJZfsmv7URKiMbHH8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/d-H0ZPoSDWs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1431&amp;p=3916#p3916</feedburner:origLink></entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[eric2009]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-09T14:16:27-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-09T14:16:27-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1426&amp;p=3915#p3915</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/Xa-p4-PoZJ4/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Re: GPR Penetration Depth (high water table)]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1426&amp;p=3915#p3915">
How much are these EM tools?&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=218"&gt;eric2009&lt;/a&gt; — Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:16 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b1npvtOB9rQP8ZUZnlTZFCZ-Pb4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b1npvtOB9rQP8ZUZnlTZFCZ-Pb4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b1npvtOB9rQP8ZUZnlTZFCZ-Pb4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b1npvtOB9rQP8ZUZnlTZFCZ-Pb4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/Xa-p4-PoZJ4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1426&amp;p=3915#p3915</feedburner:origLink></entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[eric2009]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-09T14:14:53-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-09T14:14:53-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1429&amp;p=3914#p3914</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/hxjGIK5X-GE/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Re: size of a 600 gallon underground fiberglass tank]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1429&amp;p=3914#p3914">
Thanks, Ecer!&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=218"&gt;eric2009&lt;/a&gt; — Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:14 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7ajxVRAtgvTLKbGzsrU28c6cdG0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7ajxVRAtgvTLKbGzsrU28c6cdG0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7ajxVRAtgvTLKbGzsrU28c6cdG0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7ajxVRAtgvTLKbGzsrU28c6cdG0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/hxjGIK5X-GE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1429&amp;p=3914#p3914</feedburner:origLink></entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Ecer]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-08T19:04:13-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-08T19:04:13-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1429&amp;p=3913#p3913</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/0cvUBeK0bVo/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Re: size of a 600 gallon underground fiberglass tank]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1429&amp;p=3913#p3913">
Here are the sizes of common underground fiberglass storage tanks:&lt;br /&gt;Gallon Diameter Length&lt;br /&gt;600        4'6'-11 7/8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;1,0004'11'-3 7/8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;1,5004'16'-0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;1,5006'10'-7 1/4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;2,0006'13'-5 3/4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;3,0006'16'-4 1/4&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=67"&gt;Ecer&lt;/a&gt; — Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:04 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SJfnxgxrGgzpvxRed3LhKz4X-sU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SJfnxgxrGgzpvxRed3LhKz4X-sU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SJfnxgxrGgzpvxRed3LhKz4X-sU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SJfnxgxrGgzpvxRed3LhKz4X-sU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/0cvUBeK0bVo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1429&amp;p=3913#p3913</feedburner:origLink></entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[nsm]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-08T17:41:21-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-08T17:41:21-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1430&amp;p=3912#p3912</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/Kbt9mCqS0SE/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Re: Hyperbola Flattening Transform]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1430&amp;p=3912#p3912">
The concept is straight forward from its name. It's a mathematical transformation to transform a hyperbola to a straight line. Combined with Radon Transform, which is used to detect straight lines in images, Hyperbola Flattening Transform can be used in the GPR (or seismic reflection) data to auto-detect (pattern recognition) hyperbola-causing targets such as landmines.&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=1039"&gt;nsm&lt;/a&gt; — Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:41 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6vduuH7ns_MsnZzNL1lPZduovDg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6vduuH7ns_MsnZzNL1lPZduovDg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6vduuH7ns_MsnZzNL1lPZduovDg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6vduuH7ns_MsnZzNL1lPZduovDg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/Kbt9mCqS0SE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1430&amp;p=3912#p3912</feedburner:origLink></entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[callum]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-08T14:40:56-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-08T14:40:56-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1427&amp;p=3911#p3911</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/sSfk8ez2WMg/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Re: find 100 years old leach field]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1427&amp;p=3911#p3911">
Fantastic! Thanks!&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=55"&gt;callum&lt;/a&gt; — Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:40 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vq9zmoMc3fMg9W_NA8SBDCB60rk/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vq9zmoMc3fMg9W_NA8SBDCB60rk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vq9zmoMc3fMg9W_NA8SBDCB60rk/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vq9zmoMc3fMg9W_NA8SBDCB60rk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/sSfk8ez2WMg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1427&amp;p=3911#p3911</feedburner:origLink></entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[geophix]]></name></author>
<updated>2012-02-08T14:38:19-04:00</updated>
<published>2012-02-08T14:38:19-04:00</published>
<id>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1426&amp;p=3910#p3910</id>
<link href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~3/dNqvhcXldLA/viewtopic.php" />
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Near Surface Geophysics • Re: GPR Penetration Depth (high water table)]]></title>

<category term="Near Surface Geophysics" scheme="http://forum.detectation.com/viewforum.php?f=2" label="Near Surface Geophysics" />
<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1426&amp;p=3910#p3910">
The example is on the website: &lt;!-- m --&gt;&lt;a class="postlink" href="http://www.geophex.com/gem2operation"&gt;http://www.geophex.com/gem2operation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- m --&gt;&lt;p&gt;Statistics: Posted by &lt;a href="http://forum.detectation.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;amp;u=53"&gt;geophix&lt;/a&gt; — Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:38 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ngTr15_TbT6odlJ2PD23lb8mUgo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ngTr15_TbT6odlJ2PD23lb8mUgo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ngTr15_TbT6odlJ2PD23lb8mUgo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ngTr15_TbT6odlJ2PD23lb8mUgo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeophysicsForum/~4/dNqvhcXldLA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=1426&amp;p=3910#p3910</feedburner:origLink></entry>
</feed>

