<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571</id><updated>2009-11-09T12:29:40.563-07:00</updated><title type="text">geothought</title><subtitle type="html">Thoughts on geospatial and location technology from Peter Batty</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>189</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><geo:lat>39.751586</geo:lat><geo:long>-104.996994</geo:long><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Geothought" type="application/atom+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-1813179014107576554</id><published>2009-11-09T10:37:00.005-07:00</published><updated>2009-11-09T12:29:40.571-07:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maps" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mobile" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iPhone" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google" /><title type="text">Transit routing on iPhone maps is cool!</title><summary type="text">I have been meaning to blog for some time about how useful I find the transit information in Google Maps on the iPhone. It's been around for a while, but I have been using it quite a lot recently and haven't blogged about it before. For those who haven't used it, when you calculate directions you can pick one of three options: driving, public transit, or walking (you also have the same options on</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/1813179014107576554/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=1813179014107576554" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1813179014107576554" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1813179014107576554" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/11/transit-routing-on-iphone-maps-is-cool.html" title="Transit routing on iPhone maps is cool!" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-8679493088653909727</id><published>2009-11-05T10:16:00.005-07:00</published><updated>2009-11-06T09:27:10.391-07:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="data" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maps" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="openstreetmap" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mapping" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="errors" /><title type="text">Was the Google Maps data change a big mistake?</title><summary type="text">So the discussions about the great Google map data change in the US rage on, and we are seeing more and more reports of significant data quality issues. I wrote about how Central City Parkway was completely missing, and I reported this to Google to see how the change process would work. I posted later about how it had been partially fixed, with a new geometry visible but not routable, and with </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/8679493088653909727/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=8679493088653909727" title="18 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/8679493088653909727" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/8679493088653909727" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/11/was-google-maps-data-change-big-mistake.html" title="Was the Google Maps data change a big mistake?" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">18</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-6899573353120045567</id><published>2009-11-04T11:06:00.005-07:00</published><updated>2009-11-04T12:18:03.185-07:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="neogeography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="analysis" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GIS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="FortiusOne" /><title type="text">I've joined the Advisory Board of FortiusOne</title><summary type="text">Today it was announced that I've joined the new Advisory Board of FortiusOne, together with Jeff Harris, who has a very distinguished background in the Intelligence world, and Michael Frankel and Wolf Ruzicka, who bring great expertise in Business Intelligence and enterprise software. We actually had the first Advisory Board meeting just recently and it's a great group.I've followed the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/6899573353120045567/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=6899573353120045567" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6899573353120045567" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6899573353120045567" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/11/ive-joined-advisory-board-of-fortiusone.html" title="I've joined the Advisory Board of FortiusOne" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_c53pBfWX9OY/Ssli2nm5_cI/AAAAAAAAAUE/kI4MR2dj1oA/s72-c/Medals.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-6007193075129618259</id><published>2009-11-01T17:08:00.005-07:00</published><updated>2009-11-02T08:23:21.535-07:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="video" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conference" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tips" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="presentation" /><title type="text">Tips on videoing presentations using ScreenFlow</title><summary type="text">I talk at quite a few conferences, as regular readers will know, and have been experimenting with videoing some of my presentations for a little while now. I thought I would share some of my experience on techniques I've tried and how they've worked. Basic ApproachesOf course a basic option is just to take a single digital video that includes the speaker and/or the slides. Options include setting</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/6007193075129618259/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=6007193075129618259" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6007193075129618259" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6007193075129618259" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/11/tips-on-videoing-presentations-using.html" title="Tips on videoing presentations using ScreenFlow" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-1501991565321914742</id><published>2009-10-26T17:46:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-26T20:04:00.392-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="open source" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="neogeography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conference" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GIS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="openstreetmap" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="presentation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ESRI" /><title type="text">Talk on "The Geospatial Revolution" in Minnesota</title><summary type="text">Here is a video of my recent keynote talk at the Minnesota GIS/LIS conference in Duluth, which was an excellent event. There were about 500 people there, which is great in the current economic climate. It was mainly a "traditional GIS" audience, and I got a lot of good feedback on the talk which was nice.I talk about current trends in the industry in three main areas: moving to the mainstream (at</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/1501991565321914742/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=1501991565321914742" title="8 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1501991565321914742" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1501991565321914742" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/talk-on-geospatial-revolution-in.html" title="Talk on &quot;The Geospatial Revolution&quot; in Minnesota" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">8</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-150699490646963203</id><published>2009-10-25T22:07:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-26T09:09:56.879-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maps" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="crowdsourcing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="routing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="errors" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="updates" /><title type="text">Google Maps data correction - a strange semi-update</title><summary type="text">I reported previously that I found that Google Maps was missing Central City Parkway after their change in street data provider (they are now providing their own street data rather than using Tele Atlas). I reported the error to Google and said I would report back here when it was fixed - Google is aiming to fix errors within 30 days. This evening Tom Churchill commented on my previous post to </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/150699490646963203/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=150699490646963203" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/150699490646963203" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/150699490646963203" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-maps-data-correction-strange.html" title="Google Maps data correction - a strange semi-update" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-4371966769122834230</id><published>2009-10-19T21:08:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-19T22:20:26.262-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="LBS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="uwb" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="location based service" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iPhone" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="gps" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="future" /><title type="text">Location Based Services in 2014 - Part 1</title><summary type="text">The AGI in the UK is currently carrying out a "Foresight Study" to look at where the geospatial industry will be in five years' time. They have asked several dozen people to contribute short reports on different topics, and I was asked to write about Location Based Services. I thought I would publish the current working draft here, and I encourage you to contribute comments and suggestions that I</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/4371966769122834230/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=4371966769122834230" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/4371966769122834230" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/4371966769122834230" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/location-based-services-in-2014-part-1.html" title="Location Based Services in 2014 - Part 1" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-6689307706754643471</id><published>2009-10-15T09:35:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-15T10:33:32.066-06:00</updated><title type="text">"Georant" on free geodata, Ordnance Survey and USGS</title><summary type="text">I'm a little behind on this - you may have already caught this video of me doing a "georant" at AGI GeoCommunity via Jonathan (who kindly said it was "rather funny") or GeoCommunityLive (who said that the audience were in hysterics, and "at the same time Peter had some serious points to make about the potential pitfalls of the 'free' model"). I basically discuss the fact that many people </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/6689307706754643471/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=6689307706754643471" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6689307706754643471" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6689307706754643471" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/georant-on-free-geodata-ordnance-survey.html" title="&quot;Georant&quot; on free geodata, Ordnance Survey and USGS" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-1923524858284897106</id><published>2009-10-14T13:19:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-14T13:26:32.471-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="data" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google" /><title type="text">A black hole isn't "evil", but ...</title><summary type="text">I loved this quote from Paul Ramsey, commenting on Paul Bisset's blog post about the "Google data earthquake":Right, a black hole isn’t “evil”, but that doesn’t change the fact that it massively distorts the shape of space-time everywhere it goes, which can be a bummer for any object in its immediate neighbourhood.That summarizes rather nicely concerns I've expressed in recent posts.</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/1923524858284897106/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=1923524858284897106" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1923524858284897106" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1923524858284897106" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/black-hole-isnt-evil-but.html" title="A black hole isn't &quot;evil&quot;, but ..." /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-6037695678524585563</id><published>2009-10-13T22:33:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-13T22:44:20.991-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conference" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="presentation" /><title type="text">Speaking in Minnesota next week</title><summary type="text">Just a quick post to say that I will be doing the opening keynote talk next week (Thursday October 22nd) at the 19th annual Minnesota GIS/LIS conference, in Duluth. It should be a fun and interesting event, so if you're up in that part of the world I encourage you to stop by!http://www.flickr.com/photos/clairity/ / CC BY 2.0</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/6037695678524585563/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=6037695678524585563" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6037695678524585563" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6037695678524585563" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/speaking-in-minnesota-next-week.html" title="Speaking in Minnesota next week" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-699082274582475860</id><published>2009-10-13T07:13:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-13T07:31:26.843-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="data" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maps" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="openstreetmap" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google" /><title type="text">More on the "Google data earthquake"</title><summary type="text">Following on from my previous post about Google shaking up the geospatial data industry, Steve Coast invited me and James Fee to join him for a discussion on the topic. James' blog post on the topic has 138 comments at the time of writing, which is a good indication of the interest in this change! You can listen to the podcast on the "Google data earthquake" here.One topic I talk about in the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/699082274582475860/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=699082274582475860" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/699082274582475860" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/699082274582475860" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/more-on-google-data-earthquake.html" title="More on the &quot;Google data earthquake&quot;" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-5106833268163293798</id><published>2009-10-07T17:10:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-13T21:25:33.151-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="data" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="openstreetmap" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mapping" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google" /><title type="text">Google shakes up the geospatial data industry</title><summary type="text">Well, the big news of the day is that Google has dumped Tele Atlas as the main data provider for Google Maps in the US, and is providing its own map data from a variety of sources (presumably also including its own Streetview teams). They've also added the ability to point out errors in the map, another addition to the crowdsourcing techniques they've been using. The announcement has caused a </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/5106833268163293798/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=5106833268163293798" title="7 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/5106833268163293798" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/5106833268163293798" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-shakes-up-geospatial-data.html" title="Google shakes up the geospatial data industry" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">7</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-3978213872044777108</id><published>2009-10-07T16:59:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T17:07:16.259-06:00</updated><title type="text">Jack Dangermond on GeoDesign</title><summary type="text">In my previous post on GeoDesign (and Shakespeare), I was curious about why (it seemed to me) ESRI was positioning design in GIS as something new. Their position was clarified by no less an authority than Jack Dangermond in the comments - I thought that Jack's thoughts deserved a new post of their own rather than being hidden away, so here they are ...Thanks for noticing our efforts in GeoDesign </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/3978213872044777108/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=3978213872044777108" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/3978213872044777108" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/3978213872044777108" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/jack-dangermond-on-geodesign.html" title="Jack Dangermond on GeoDesign" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-4980486344677016726</id><published>2009-09-17T22:50:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-17T23:12:44.853-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GIS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="design" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Shakespeare" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ESRI" /><title type="text">Shakespeare on GeoDesign</title><summary type="text">I've been trying to figure out why ESRI is suddenly trying to make such a big deal of "GeoDesign" - this announcement talks about introducing "the first generation of geodesign concepts, technologies, and tools". But people have been doing design in GIS for decades - the first release of Smallworld in 1991 was really all about design, with features like version management to enable you to analyze</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/4980486344677016726/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=4980486344677016726" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/4980486344677016726" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/4980486344677016726" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/09/shakespeare-on-geodesign.html" title="Shakespeare on GeoDesign" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-1572710795800190162</id><published>2009-09-16T13:37:00.009-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-17T09:30:53.240-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Electric" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="powermeter" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="smart grid" /><title type="text">Google PowerMeter accidentally wipes out small industry on the way to changing the world??</title><summary type="text">I spent the last few days at the Autovation conference in Denver, which is focused on Smart Metering and the Smart Grid, an area that I am becoming increasingly interested in and one where Enspiria is doing a lot of work (where I work part time as Chief Technology Advisor). It was a very interesting conference - there is certainly lots of activity and energy in the space, especially since the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/1572710795800190162/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=1572710795800190162" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1572710795800190162" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1572710795800190162" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-powermeter-accidentally-wipes.html" title="Google PowerMeter accidentally wipes out small industry on the way to changing the world??" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-7282735154761540591</id><published>2009-09-06T12:56:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-06T16:42:45.889-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conference" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AGI" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="presentation" /><title type="text">Looking forward to the AGI GeoCommunity conference</title><summary type="text">I'm very much looking forward to the AGI GeoCommunity conference which is coming up in Stratford upon Avon in a couple of weeks. Apart from Stratford being the birthplace of Shakespeare and a great place to visit, it's also very close to Leamington Spa where I used to live when I worked at IBM UK many years ago, so it will be a chance for me to catch up with old friends. It will also be the first</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/7282735154761540591/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=7282735154761540591" title="10 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/7282735154761540591" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/7282735154761540591" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/09/looking-forward-to-agi-geocommunity.html" title="Looking forward to the AGI GeoCommunity conference" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">10</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-1849544424317740972</id><published>2009-08-24T09:59:00.007-06:00</published><updated>2009-08-24T12:54:52.980-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="General Electric" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="vendor" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Smallworld" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GIS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Intergraph" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ESRI" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="market share" /><title type="text">Traditional GIS vendor market share for 2008-2009</title><summary type="text">Daratech has published its annual analysis of the GIS industry. I thought there were a few interesting things worth commenting on there. First I should say though that I am generally somewhat skeptical of these type of reports - there is a lot of subjectivity in what gets included and what doesn't. One illustration of this was when Bentley suddenly jumped to the number 2 position ahead of </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/1849544424317740972/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=1849544424317740972" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1849544424317740972" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1849544424317740972" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/08/traditional-gis-vendor-market-share-for.html" title="Traditional GIS vendor market share for 2008-2009" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-1322270488606638790</id><published>2009-08-19T10:58:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-11-07T16:46:21.257-07:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="video" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="smart grid" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="presentation" /><title type="text">What is the Smart Grid?</title><summary type="text">Here is the second (of two) short video presentations on what the Smart Grid is, at a high level. This follows on from my previous one on why we need a Smart Grid - you should watch that one before watching this one.In future installments I'll talk more about some of the IT challenges in making the Smart Grid happen, the impact of geospatial technology / GIS on the Smart Grid and vice versa.The </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/1322270488606638790/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=1322270488606638790" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1322270488606638790" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/1322270488606638790" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-is-smart-grid.html" title="What is the Smart Grid?" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-7887541530760197901</id><published>2009-08-10T20:58:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-08-10T22:07:29.202-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conference" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="wherecamp5280" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="wherecamp" /><title type="text">WhereCamp5280 is almost upon us!</title><summary type="text">As I have posted about previously, I'm helping to organize a cool, and FREE, "geo-unconference" in Denver called WhereCamp5280 (5280 = the altitude of Denver in feet, for those not from round here!), which is now almost upon us - it's this Friday and Saturday, August 14-15. We've been really pleased with the response - check out the list of likely attendees and potential talks (being an </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/7887541530760197901/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=7887541530760197901" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/7887541530760197901" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/7887541530760197901" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/08/wherecamp5280-is-almost-upon-us.html" title="WhereCamp5280 is almost upon us!" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-106115445315688972</id><published>2009-08-10T20:42:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-24T01:15:18.324-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GIS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Electric" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="smart grid" /><title type="text">Why do we need a Smart Grid?</title><summary type="text">In my role as Chief Technology Advisor at Enspiria Solutions, I've recently been researching the Smart Grid. I've found that even a lot of people working in the electric industry have somewhat fuzzy ideas about it, or understand some aspects but not others. I've put together some short presentations on the subject. The first two you might call "Smart Grid 101" - the first one, below, talks about </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/106115445315688972/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=106115445315688972" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/106115445315688972" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/106115445315688972" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/08/why-do-we-need-smart-grid.html" title="Why do we need a Smart Grid?" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-7496768915762844317</id><published>2009-08-04T15:31:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-08-04T16:13:47.833-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Spatial Networking" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Netezza" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="database" /><title type="text">Netezza announces new architecture with 10-15x price-performance improvement</title><summary type="text">I have previously discussed Netezza, who produce data warehousing appliances that provide outstanding performance and simplicity for complex analytics on very large data volumes. I did some consulting work with them last year as they added spatial capabilities to their system. Today they announced a major new architecture, which they say gives a 3-5x performance improvement for typical workloads </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/7496768915762844317/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=7496768915762844317" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/7496768915762844317" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/7496768915762844317" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/08/netezza-announces-new-architecture-with.html" title="Netezza announces new architecture with 10-15x price-performance improvement" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-4929882375667797572</id><published>2009-08-04T10:38:00.009-06:00</published><updated>2009-08-05T10:34:34.766-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geoweb" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conference" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="web mapping" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><title type="text">GeoWeb 2009 review</title><summary type="text">The GeoWeb 2009 conference was very good as usual. The presentations I attended were a bit of a mixed bag - some excellent, a few so so - but the networking and hallway conversations were great. James has done a good writeup. I'll just comment on a few things that I thought were interesting.One trend was increasing acknowledgment that the traditional approach to SDI (Spatial Data Infrastructure) </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/4929882375667797572/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=4929882375667797572" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/4929882375667797572" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/4929882375667797572" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/08/geoweb-2009-review.html" title="GeoWeb 2009 review" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-6943724730431331396</id><published>2009-07-30T12:59:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-07-30T13:08:38.375-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="social networking" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conference" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="whereyougonnabe" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mapping" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="presentation" /><title type="text">My GeoWeb 2009 presentation</title><summary type="text">Here's a video of my GeoWeb presentation on "Building a new location-aware infrastructure for calendaring and scheduling". Recorded and edited using ScreenFlow.GeoWeb 2009 presentation by Peter Batty from Peter Batty on Vimeo.I'll post more thoughts on GeoWeb soon - in the mean time you can check out my tweets and the geoweb stream on twitter. And there are some pics of the social event here.</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/6943724730431331396/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=6943724730431331396" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6943724730431331396" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/6943724730431331396" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/07/my-geoweb-2009-presentation.html" title="My GeoWeb 2009 presentation" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-2806922078517804161</id><published>2009-07-28T18:05:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-07-28T19:07:34.974-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="neogeography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GIS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><title type="text">Are we now in the post-neogeography era?</title><summary type="text">So all the discussion about my last post got me to thinking about how to define "neogeography". I was really using it in a pretty broad sense, as a convenient label for the “new generation” of web mapping tools and related technologies that have emerged over the past few years – essentially the “disruptive technology” that Clayton Christensen talks about. These systems include Google Maps and </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/2806922078517804161/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=2806922078517804161" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/2806922078517804161" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/2806922078517804161" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/07/are-we-now-in-post-neogeography-era.html" title="Are we now in the post-neogeography era?" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8470995059384390571.post-3786122472682790535</id><published>2009-07-28T08:03:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-07-28T10:31:39.343-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="neogeography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GIS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mapping" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="geospatial" /><title type="text">Twitter discussion on "neogeography" versus "GIS"</title><summary type="text">My post yesterday triggered some interesting discussion on Twitter (I guess the cool kids don't comment on blogs any more, that's so 2008!). Here's a quick cut and paste with most of the relevant stuff (the relevance fades towards the end but I figured I would leave some of those bits in!). I will post more thoughts shortly on what I think "neogeography" actually is. If you want to figure out who</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/feeds/3786122472682790535/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8470995059384390571&amp;postID=3786122472682790535" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/3786122472682790535" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8470995059384390571/posts/default/3786122472682790535" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/07/twitter-discussion-on-neogeography.html" title="Twitter discussion on &quot;neogeography&quot; versus &quot;GIS&quot;" /><author><name>Peter Batty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10803273537153805225</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="12398078311773369692" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total></entry></feed>
