<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587</id><updated>2007-11-10T21:50:15.440-05:00</updated><title type="text">Give Up Blog</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25" /><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1229</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/GiveUpBlog" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site, subject to copyright and fair use.</feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-7705188483408391248</id><published>2007-04-21T20:18:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-04-21T20:25:25.618-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Goodbye" /><title type="text">Extended Hiatus</title><summary type="text">Hello Everybody!

Enthusiasm for Give Up Blog has diminished a bit after, well, all of our predictions came true.  In the end, it's the incompetence of Republicans which has undermined them, rather than  successful politicking from Democratic politicians.  We believed the inevitable result of people living under Republicanism would be exasperation and contempt for Republicans.  And what can we </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/04/extended-hiatus.html" title="Extended Hiatus" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=7705188483408391248" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/7705188483408391248" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/7705188483408391248" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-5645769398465890761</id><published>2007-03-31T12:17:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-31T12:20:20.093-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="idiots" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="homophobia" /><title type="text">Osama Bin Laden and Zombies</title><summary type="text">What do they have in common?  They're  both similar to gay-rights protesters.

 "Osama Bin Laden's threat against the West is milder compared to the movements of [Soulforce founder] Mel White and others who are eating away at the vitals of a traditional society like zombies threatening to destroy traditional families," David wrote. "This is a guerilla war against traditional human marriages." 

</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/osama-bin-laden-and-zombies.html" title="Osama Bin Laden and Zombies" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=5645769398465890761" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5645769398465890761" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5645769398465890761" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-763715396300628523</id><published>2007-03-29T13:56:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-29T13:58:28.443-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="criminals" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Republicans" /><title type="text">Ok, if this isn't obstruction of justice</title><summary type="text">How about firing an AG at the behest of Jack Abramoff?  Will that do?

     Before Attorneygate, there was Guam.    Back in the spring of 2002, when Guam's then-Governor, Carl Gutierrez, found himself in the cross-hairs of a federal corruption probe, he hired disgraced über-lobbyist Jack Abramoff to force out the US territory's longtime acting US Attorney, Frederick Black. "I don't care if they </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/ok-if-this-isnt-obstruction-of-justice.html" title="Ok, if this isn't obstruction of justice" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=763715396300628523" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/763715396300628523" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/763715396300628523" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-2287978605097685997</id><published>2007-03-27T11:35:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-27T11:40:31.551-04:00</updated><title type="text">Now I'm rooting for  a Veto</title><summary type="text">Thanks to Harry Reid, I actually glad Bush is going to veto the emergency spending bill (it's not like he's going to accept it anyway).  Have you seen some of the crap earmarks people have slipped into this thing to make it widely palatable?  Here's the worst.

Senate debate began yesterday on the bill, which provides $122 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; sets a goal of March 31, </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/now-im-rooting-for-veto.html" title="Now I'm rooting for  a Veto" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=2287978605097685997" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/2287978605097685997" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/2287978605097685997" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-8136065101594471479</id><published>2007-03-26T13:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-26T13:57:05.087-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="idiots" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Republicans" /><title type="text">The Next Scandal</title><summary type="text">This one may be even more appealing than the prosecutor scandal because it seems to implicate Karl Rove in a violation of the Hatch act - the improper use of federal employees for political reasons.  Leave it to the WaPo to dig this up for the world to see.

Witnesses have told congressional investigators that the chief of the General Services Administration and a deputy in Karl Rove's political </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/next-scandal.html" title="The Next Scandal" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=8136065101594471479" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/8136065101594471479" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/8136065101594471479" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-5776955342066102615</id><published>2007-03-26T13:50:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-26T13:51:55.765-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Cheney" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bush" /><title type="text">Bill Maher on Bush and Cheney</title><summary type="text">I saw this on Friday night.



Bill Maher at his best.  Probably the best indictment I've heard of Bush and Cheney on a specific scandal yet.</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/bill-maher-on-bush-and-cheney.html" title="Bill Maher on Bush and Cheney" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=5776955342066102615" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5776955342066102615" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5776955342066102615" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-519565454762310264</id><published>2007-03-19T00:04:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-19T01:37:06.275-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="infant mortality" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="science" /><title type="text">Wow does this guy get it wrong</title><summary type="text">I have been alerted to this article in slate blaming the United States' high infant mortality rate on fertilization treatments and emphasis on neonatal care rather than healthcare inequality between the rich in the poor. Dr. Singhavi argues that it is these interventions, and not the absence of a single-payer health system that explains our exceedingly high rate for a developed country.

</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/wow-does-this-guy-get-it-wrong.html" title="Wow does this guy get it wrong" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=519565454762310264" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/519565454762310264" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/519565454762310264" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-7934910679549081744</id><published>2007-03-16T09:32:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-16T13:08:01.175-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="prosecutor scandal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Republicans" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="assholes" /><title type="text">A Vote for DC</title><summary type="text">They should re-title this article "Republicans don't believe in Democracy".  

It simply amazes me that they can oppose representation in congress of DC's citizens with a straight face while pretending to be all about spreading democracy abroad.

**Update** Everyone should read the NYT opinion on the prosecutor purge today.  They state, and I agree, that it is further evidence that Republicans </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/vote-for-dc.html" title="A Vote for DC" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=7934910679549081744" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/7934910679549081744" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/7934910679549081744" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-5755060667510611214</id><published>2007-03-16T00:09:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-15T23:53:17.327-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="prosecutor scandal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Republicans" /><title type="text">Uh oh</title><summary type="text">Rove talked to Gonzalez about the firings.  

Remember, Gonzalez has testified, under oath, that the firings weren't political.  Now we find he was talking to the White House political adviser about it?  The connection between Harriet Miers and the scandal was bad enough.  This is a smoking gun.  Time for Gonzalez to be convicted of lying to congress.</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/uh-oh.html" title="Uh oh" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=5755060667510611214" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5755060667510611214" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5755060667510611214" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-5414882417058113620</id><published>2007-03-15T17:12:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-15T17:16:03.536-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="No Child Left Behind" /><title type="text">NCLB is a joke</title><summary type="text">Even the Republicans can no longer defend No Child Left Behind with a straight face.  


More than 50 GOP members of the House and Senate -- including the House's second-ranking Republican -- will introduce legislation today that could severely undercut President Bush's signature domestic achievement, the No Child Left Behind Act, by allowing states to opt out of its testing mandates.

They're </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/nclb-is-joke.html" title="NCLB is a joke" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=5414882417058113620" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5414882417058113620" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5414882417058113620" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-5189603520206210119</id><published>2007-03-15T16:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-15T17:12:18.999-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Iraq" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="assholes" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Lieberman" /><title type="text">Traitor Joe Strikes again</title><summary type="text">The Senate has failed to get a resolution passed for withdrawal from Iraq.  Wondering why?  Why LiebesBush of course. 

The Reid Resolution to require a troop withdrawal beginning in 120 days and with a completion goal of March 31, 2008, failed 48-50.  For those keeping score at home, those opposing were the 49 Republicans and Joe Lieberman.  

Benedict Arnold doesn't seem mean enough an epithet </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/traitor-joe-strikes-again.html" title="Traitor Joe Strikes again" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=5189603520206210119" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5189603520206210119" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5189603520206210119" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-6014664768766036041</id><published>2007-03-14T21:15:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-03-14T21:16:30.626-04:00</updated><title type="text">Sleep Drive the Whip!</title><summary type="text">The Washington Post reports that Halcion and all prescription sleeping pills can cause "sleep-driving:"

It's a more complicated version of sleepwalking, but behind the wheel: getting up in the middle of the night and going for a drive with no memory of doing so.

Now, "Halcion Madness" sucks.  But this new side effect may outweigh it...

If only my car hadn't been smashed by a SUV, I'd be </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/sleep-drive-whip.html" title="Sleep Drive the Whip!" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=6014664768766036041" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/6014664768766036041" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/6014664768766036041" /><author><name>Chris</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-6960149637755867992</id><published>2007-03-09T16:01:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-14T21:56:02.850-04:00</updated><title type="text">J2P2</title><summary type="text">From Ritual Roasters in San Francisco.

</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/j2p2.html" title="J2P2" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=6960149637755867992" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/6960149637755867992" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/6960149637755867992" /><author><name>Chris</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-1489125781124919498</id><published>2007-03-09T11:04:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-09T11:06:23.193-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="denialism" /><title type="text">The New Yorker covers AIDS denialists!</title><summary type="text">Gawker  tells us a little bit about  a new article in the New Yorker, sadly not online, by Michael Specter talking about HIV/AIDS denialists (and calling them that).

Anyone got a copy of this weeks New Yorker?  I want it.</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/new-yorker-covers-aids-denialists.html" title="The New Yorker covers AIDS denialists!" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=1489125781124919498" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/1489125781124919498" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/1489125781124919498" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-389340376446337922</id><published>2007-03-07T09:32:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-07T09:36:48.254-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="eliot spitzer" /><title type="text">One thing</title><summary type="text">This LA Times article comparing Spitzer and Schwarzenegger for me keeps the Give Up dream alive.  In the face of a federal government that is still frozen in place by Republicans, a president and the minority that supports him, it's reassuring to see some are still hoping for the state-based progressive attack.

But Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer share more than an </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/one-thing.html" title="One thing" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=389340376446337922" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/389340376446337922" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/389340376446337922" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-3757721804372290034</id><published>2007-03-07T09:18:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-07T09:19:34.116-05:00</updated><title type="text">Week off</title><summary type="text">Posting will be a little slow from me for about a week.  Don't give up on us though, I'll be back.</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/week-off.html" title="Week off" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=3757721804372290034" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/3757721804372290034" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/3757721804372290034" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-4504839165351829018</id><published>2007-03-07T01:11:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-07T01:21:35.122-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="corruption" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Republicans" /><title type="text">Friendly advice</title><summary type="text">I love this prosecutor scandal.  There are few things more clear cut than the kind of obstruction of justice going on here.  You simply don't call up an AG or a US attorney and make suggestions, and then this firing is beyond belief.  

I have trouble understanding what the administration was thinking.  Is this some kind of ploy to make us ignore an even bigger scandal?  Isn't one senior official</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/friendly-advice.html" title="Friendly advice" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=4504839165351829018" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/4504839165351829018" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/4504839165351829018" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-3616862141097495361</id><published>2007-03-06T00:08:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-05T23:43:54.293-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Jim Webb" /><title type="text">Jim Webb</title><summary type="text">He's still kicking ass in the senate.  Now he's trying to pass a bill specifically stating that Bush does not have the authority to unilaterally attack Iran, because apparently, they won't say that isn't their plan.

"On the one hand, the Administration assures us that it has no intention of launching military operations against Iran. On the other, the Administration tells us that all options </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/jim-webb.html" title="Jim Webb" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=3616862141097495361" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/3616862141097495361" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/3616862141097495361" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-2245638814365950148</id><published>2007-03-05T11:00:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-05T11:09:21.899-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supporting the Troops" /><title type="text">Not just Walter Reed</title><summary type="text">WaPo writes how since publishing their expose of the conditions at Walter Reed (which the military solved by forbidding soldiers from talking to the press), conditions at VAs across the country have been deteriorating from funding cuts from Bush and the Republicans.  

. Up to 40 percent of the troops fighting in Iraq are National Guard members and reservists -- "our neighbors," said Ron Glasser,</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/not-just-walter-reed.html" title="Not just Walter Reed" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=2245638814365950148" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/2245638814365950148" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/2245638814365950148" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-2941310794279804276</id><published>2007-03-05T10:14:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-05T10:19:42.270-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="prosecutor scandal" /><title type="text">Other stuff</title><summary type="text">We're incarcerating 9-year-olds now as part of the war on immigrants/terrorism/decency.

And what's the deal with this prosecutor mess?  Gonzalez is threatening to ignore subpoenas from Democrats over it, you have really obvious political motivations for their dismissal, and Gonzalez has already lied in front of congress about it saying the removal was because of job performance, not politics, </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/other-stuff.html" title="Other stuff" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=2941310794279804276" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/2941310794279804276" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/2941310794279804276" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-7924233920514428936</id><published>2007-03-05T10:04:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-05T10:14:17.963-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="idiots" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Republicans" /><title type="text">Which is dumber?</title><summary type="text">I think I made an error in the immigration story.  I can't remember now, is Dana Rohrabacher or Jim Inhofe that is the stupidest man in congress?  Evidence from this Conservative Political Action Conference (where Coulter went off the deep end as usual), is that it might be Inhofe:


Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) got the crowd cheering early in the day. "I have been called -- my kids are all aware of</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/which-is-dumber.html" title="Which is dumber?" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=7924233920514428936" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/7924233920514428936" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/7924233920514428936" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-5776569555700057327</id><published>2007-03-05T09:49:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-05T10:00:05.826-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="immigration" /><title type="text">Immigration insanity</title><summary type="text">The NYT this weekend describes why those durn imgrants taking our jurrrbs again probably aren't causing economic harm.  Without them, farmers need to find prisoners to do the labor.  Maybe that's a sign they really aren't taking our jurrrbs?

What's really pathetic is that Dana Rohrabacher (the stupidest man in congress) originally proposed this as a solution to the immigration non-problem.  This</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/immigration-insanity.html" title="Immigration insanity" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=5776569555700057327" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5776569555700057327" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5776569555700057327" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-9002962011147023509</id><published>2007-03-05T09:45:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-05T09:48:58.831-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ashcroft" /><title type="text">Hey lawyers</title><summary type="text">Does Ashcroft's behavior as a lobbyist seem crooked to you?

First we hear that he thinks the XM/Sirius merger is the worst thing ever, (I think it  probably should be forbidden too).  But then we hear Ashcroft offered his services to XM and Sirius first and only after he was turned down went to the National Association of Broadcasters to attack the merger.

Is this actually unethical or just </summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/hey-lawyers.html" title="Hey lawyers" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=9002962011147023509" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/9002962011147023509" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/9002962011147023509" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-5543232501157809751</id><published>2007-03-05T09:43:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-05T09:44:45.690-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="xkcd" /><title type="text">XKCD</title><summary type="text">

I love those cartoons.</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/xkcd.html" title="XKCD" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=5543232501157809751" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5543232501157809751" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/5543232501157809751" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17953587.post-2783277387347305112</id><published>2007-03-03T02:04:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-03-03T02:06:39.537-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="idiots" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Anne Coulter" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="assholes" /><title type="text">Next quiz, Coulter or Dobson?</title><summary type="text">Ann Coulter's intolerant quote of the year, "I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I - so kind of an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards."

Wow.  I mean, just, wow.</summary><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/2007/03/next-quiz-coulter-or-dobson.html" title="Next quiz, Coulter or Dobson?" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17953587&amp;postID=2783277387347305112" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.giveupblog.com/atom.xml" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/2783277387347305112" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17953587/posts/default/2783277387347305112" /><author><name>Rev. Dr.</name></author></entry></feed>
