<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Global Economic Intersection</title>
	
	<link>http://econintersect.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Global Economic News and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:27:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/GlobalEconomicIntersection" /><feedburner:info uri="globaleconomicintersection" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>January 2012 Pending Home Sales Suggest Improving Market</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/zjg1GFQYJdM/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19368#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Sales and Home Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[existing home sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home sales data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national association of realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pending home sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19368</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Written by <a rel="”author”" href="http://econintersect.com/files/stevenhansen.htm">Steven Hansen</a></blockquote>
<img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/house-for-sale-2.png" alt="" width="170" height="124" />The short and sweet version of the <em>Econintersect</em> analysis of the National Association of Realtors (NAR) pending home sales index:

NAR <a href="http://www.realtor.org/press_room/news_releases/2012/02/phs_jan">January 2012 press release</a>:
<ul>
	<li>index up 2.0% month-over-month and up 8.0% year-over-year</li>
</ul>
<em>Econintersect</em> Analysis:
<ul>
	<li>index up 5.7% month-over-month and up 10.1% year-over-year</li>
	<li>this index value is predicting February 2012 existing home sales of 275,000 - which would be a 9.1% gain year-over-year in existing home sales</li>
</ul>
From the NAR press release:<span id="more-19368"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19368">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Written by <a rel="”author”" href="http://econintersect.com/files/stevenhansen.htm">Steven Hansen</a></blockquote>
<img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/house-for-sale-2.png" alt="" width="170" height="124" />The short and sweet version of the <em>Econintersect</em> analysis of the National Association of Realtors (NAR) pending home sales index:

NAR <a href="http://www.realtor.org/press_room/news_releases/2012/02/phs_jan">January 2012 press release</a>:
<ul>
	<li>index up 2.0% month-over-month and up 8.0% year-over-year</li>
</ul>
<em>Econintersect</em> Analysis:
<ul>
	<li>index up 5.7% month-over-month and up 10.1% year-over-year</li>
	<li>this index value is predicting February 2012 existing home sales of 275,000 - which would be a 9.1% gain year-over-year in existing home sales</li>
</ul>
From the NAR press release:<span id="more-19368"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19368">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/acafK-mT9ErdH4fhcH6VZwyutpM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/acafK-mT9ErdH4fhcH6VZwyutpM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/acafK-mT9ErdH4fhcH6VZwyutpM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/acafK-mT9ErdH4fhcH6VZwyutpM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/zjg1GFQYJdM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19368</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19368</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The European coup d’état</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/2lgdE_MLJBY/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19355#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barroso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Fool.info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudo de Ruijter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19355</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>by Guest Author Rudo de Ruijter, <a href="http://www.courtfool.info/en_home.htm">Court Fool.info</a></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/fortress-europe-barbed-wire.jpg"><img style="float: left; margin: 6px;" title="fortress europe barbed wireSMALL" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/fortress-europe-barbed-wireSMALL.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="130" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Preliminary message to  Parliamentarians.</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>What is special in this ESM treaty (European Stability Mechanism)? The Ministers of  Finance get a new part-time function as Governors of the ESM. The national  parliaments have no authority over their Minister of Finance, when the latter  acts as Governors of the ESM. The Governors freely dispose of the State's  Vaults. No veto-right has been foreseen for the national parliaments.  Ratifying this treaty is the death of the sovereign democracies of the Eurozone.</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>(And if you are not a Parliamentarian, make sure  your Parliamentarians get this message, for otherwise they will give the key of  democracy to the devil without even being aware of it!) </strong></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-19355"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19355">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>by Guest Author Rudo de Ruijter, <a href="http://www.courtfool.info/en_home.htm">Court Fool.info</a></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/fortress-europe-barbed-wire.jpg"><img style="float: left; margin: 6px;" title="fortress europe barbed wireSMALL" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/fortress-europe-barbed-wireSMALL.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="130" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Preliminary message to  Parliamentarians.</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>What is special in this ESM treaty (European Stability Mechanism)? The Ministers of  Finance get a new part-time function as Governors of the ESM. The national  parliaments have no authority over their Minister of Finance, when the latter  acts as Governors of the ESM. The Governors freely dispose of the State's  Vaults. No veto-right has been foreseen for the national parliaments.  Ratifying this treaty is the death of the sovereign democracies of the Eurozone.</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>(And if you are not a Parliamentarian, make sure  your Parliamentarians get this message, for otherwise they will give the key of  democracy to the devil without even being aware of it!) </strong></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-19355"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19355">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/WhAkVU4GGQ15Xk47tSCz9WqzGw8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/WhAkVU4GGQ15Xk47tSCz9WqzGw8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/WhAkVU4GGQ15Xk47tSCz9WqzGw8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/WhAkVU4GGQ15Xk47tSCz9WqzGw8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/2lgdE_MLJBY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19355</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19355</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Law of Gravity</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/9Mt3RrDV3x8/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19345#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ajay Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajay Shah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic law of gravity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Ocean region]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myranmar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Asia economic region]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19345</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>by Ajay Shah</blockquote>
<strong><a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/gravity-law-400px.png"><img title="gravity law 400pxSMALL" width="160" style="float: right; margin: 4px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/gravity-law-400pxSMALL.png" alt="" height="130" /></a><em>Editor's note:</em></strong><em> From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation">Wikipedia</a>, the Newtonian Law of Gravity says the force between two bodies is proportional to product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the distance between them.  The equation is</em>

<dl> <dd style="text-align: center;"><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/0/f/3/0f36df929ac9d711a8ba8c5658c3bfee.png" alt="F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}\ " />,</dd> <dd> <em>where G is a proportionality constant known as the <a title="Gravitational constant" href="/wiki/Gravitational_constant">gravitational constant</a>.</em></dd> </dl>
<div dir="ltr">

A key intuition of modern  thinking in international trade and international finance is that distance  matters much more than we think.

We may like to believe that the world is  becoming more flat. We may like to believe that for weightless things like  services and financial flows, distance is irrelevant. But the research evidence  is unambiguous: there is a `gravity model' in the affairs of men. The  interactions between two countries tend to go up in proportion to the product of  their GDP, and vary inversely with the squared distance between  them.<span id="more-19345"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19345">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>by Ajay Shah</blockquote>
<strong><a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/gravity-law-400px.png"><img title="gravity law 400pxSMALL" width="160" style="float: right; margin: 4px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/gravity-law-400pxSMALL.png" alt="" height="130" /></a><em>Editor's note:</em></strong><em> From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation">Wikipedia</a>, the Newtonian Law of Gravity says the force between two bodies is proportional to product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the distance between them.  The equation is</em>

<dl> <dd style="text-align: center;"><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/0/f/3/0f36df929ac9d711a8ba8c5658c3bfee.png" alt="F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}\ " />,</dd> <dd> <em>where G is a proportionality constant known as the <a title="Gravitational constant" href="/wiki/Gravitational_constant">gravitational constant</a>.</em></dd> </dl>
<div dir="ltr">

A key intuition of modern  thinking in international trade and international finance is that distance  matters much more than we think.

We may like to believe that the world is  becoming more flat. We may like to believe that for weightless things like  services and financial flows, distance is irrelevant. But the research evidence  is unambiguous: there is a `gravity model' in the affairs of men. The  interactions between two countries tend to go up in proportion to the product of  their GDP, and vary inversely with the squared distance between  them.<span id="more-19345"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19345">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AylitYsXktvOtsdkAM9HkEsX85M/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AylitYsXktvOtsdkAM9HkEsX85M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AylitYsXktvOtsdkAM9HkEsX85M/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AylitYsXktvOtsdkAM9HkEsX85M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/9Mt3RrDV3x8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19345</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19345</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Coincident Data Providing Confirmation of Improving Economy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/gTFA_-yzEBk/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19225#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weekly Economic Summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFNAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coincident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indicator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekly economic review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19225</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<img style="margin: 6px; float: left;" title="z weekly" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/z-weekly3.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="170" />
<blockquote>Written by <a rel="”author”" href="http://econintersect.com/files/stevenhansen.htm">Steven Hansen</a></blockquote>
On Friday <a href="http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000075118#eyJ2aWQiOiIzMDAwMDc1MTE4IiwiZW5jVmlkIjoiVmtXOGVLL1FBZk9lUjI4VktPUXVnZz09IiwidlRhYiI6InRyYW5zY3JpcHQiLCJ2UGFnZSI6MSwiZ05hdiI6WyLCoExhdGVzdCBWaWRlbyJdLCJnU2VjdCI6IkFMTCIsImdQYWdlIjoiMSIsInN5bSI6IiIsInNlYXJjaCI6IiJ9">on CNBC</a>, ECRI renewed their recession call - now saying a recession should hit by mid-year 2012.   Supporting evidence for this call was based on coincident data's growth rate-of-change was falling to historical recession levels.

There is no current data in my world that is suggesting a USA recession.  Econintersect focuses on elements of economic releases (and not the headlines) which historically have led economic cycles.  Econintersect's analysis is always based on the change of rate of growth.

And for the most part, these economic elements are suggesting the economy is improving - but also are indicating the growth rate of change is slowing or flat.  But in all cases to date, the growth rate of change is above historical rate-of-change which would indicate an upcoming recession.

Most readers focus on the headlines of economic releases - jobs up, jobs down, industrial production up, industrial production down, trade up, trade down.  Pundits grab these headlines and spout, then the markets react.   Many of these pundits and most readers cannot assign a relative importance to individual headlines anyway.

<span id="more-19225"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19225">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="margin: 6px; float: left;" title="z weekly" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/z-weekly3.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="170" />
<blockquote>Written by <a rel="”author”" href="http://econintersect.com/files/stevenhansen.htm">Steven Hansen</a></blockquote>
On Friday <a href="http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000075118#eyJ2aWQiOiIzMDAwMDc1MTE4IiwiZW5jVmlkIjoiVmtXOGVLL1FBZk9lUjI4VktPUXVnZz09IiwidlRhYiI6InRyYW5zY3JpcHQiLCJ2UGFnZSI6MSwiZ05hdiI6WyLCoExhdGVzdCBWaWRlbyJdLCJnU2VjdCI6IkFMTCIsImdQYWdlIjoiMSIsInN5bSI6IiIsInNlYXJjaCI6IiJ9">on CNBC</a>, ECRI renewed their recession call - now saying a recession should hit by mid-year 2012.   Supporting evidence for this call was based on coincident data's growth rate-of-change was falling to historical recession levels.

There is no current data in my world that is suggesting a USA recession.  Econintersect focuses on elements of economic releases (and not the headlines) which historically have led economic cycles.  Econintersect's analysis is always based on the change of rate of growth.

And for the most part, these economic elements are suggesting the economy is improving - but also are indicating the growth rate of change is slowing or flat.  But in all cases to date, the growth rate of change is above historical rate-of-change which would indicate an upcoming recession.

Most readers focus on the headlines of economic releases - jobs up, jobs down, industrial production up, industrial production down, trade up, trade down.  Pundits grab these headlines and spout, then the markets react.   Many of these pundits and most readers cannot assign a relative importance to individual headlines anyway.

<span id="more-19225"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19225">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EqtCoRegJcPcev2dOz5sHWwzSN0/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EqtCoRegJcPcev2dOz5sHWwzSN0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EqtCoRegJcPcev2dOz5sHWwzSN0/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EqtCoRegJcPcev2dOz5sHWwzSN0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/gTFA_-yzEBk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19225</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19225</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Final February 2012 Michigan Consumer Sentiment At 12 Month High</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/4r77_zB2_sM/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19297#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Short</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Sentiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisor Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dshort.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Consumer Sentiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business optimism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19297</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>by Doug Short, <a href="http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/Michigan-Consumer-Sentiment-Index.php">Advisor Perspectives/dshort.com</a></blockquote>
<img style="margin: 6px; float: right;" title="z consumer" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/z-consumer.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="128" />The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index final report for February came in at 75.3, a rebound from the 72.5 preliminary report and the highest reading since February a year ago. Today's number was above the Briefing.com's consensus forecast of 73.0 and Briefing.com's 73.5.

See the chart below for a long-term perspective on this widely watched index. Because the sentiment index has trended upward since its inception in 1978, I've added a linear regression to help understand the pattern of reversion to the trend. I've also highlighted recessions and included real GDP to help evaluate the correlation between the Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index and the broader economy.

<span id="more-19297"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19297">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>by Doug Short, <a href="http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/Michigan-Consumer-Sentiment-Index.php">Advisor Perspectives/dshort.com</a></blockquote>
<img style="margin: 6px; float: right;" title="z consumer" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/z-consumer.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="128" />The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index final report for February came in at 75.3, a rebound from the 72.5 preliminary report and the highest reading since February a year ago. Today's number was above the Briefing.com's consensus forecast of 73.0 and Briefing.com's 73.5.

See the chart below for a long-term perspective on this widely watched index. Because the sentiment index has trended upward since its inception in 1978, I've added a linear regression to help understand the pattern of reversion to the trend. I've also highlighted recessions and included real GDP to help evaluate the correlation between the Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index and the broader economy.

<span id="more-19297"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19297">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_fKcaPVF857gfAEUpOG4oykEO9A/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_fKcaPVF857gfAEUpOG4oykEO9A/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_fKcaPVF857gfAEUpOG4oykEO9A/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_fKcaPVF857gfAEUpOG4oykEO9A/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/4r77_zB2_sM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19297</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19297</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>New Home Sales Better than Headlines in January 2012</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/u443THINhuM/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19291#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Sales and Home Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home sales data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lounsbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new home sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19291</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Written by <a rel="”author”" href="http://econintersect.com/files/johnlounsbury.htm">John Lounsbury</a> and <a rel="”author”" href="http://econintersect.com/files/stevenhansen.htm">Steven Hansen</a></blockquote>
<img style="float: left; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-new-home1.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="117" />Another data release where the previous month was changed enough to negate that month's analysis.  In any event, last month now looks better - and new home sales volumes are up or equal for the fourth month in a row.

This continues to indicate new home sales may be at the bottom of the decline which began in 2005.

Let us start with perspective - new home sales are less than 1/4 of the peak values seen in 2005 - and are running at levels last seen in the 1970's (non seasonally adjusted data).  But still, the last 6 months have been stronger than 2010 sales.  <span id="more-19291"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19291">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Written by <a rel="”author”" href="http://econintersect.com/files/johnlounsbury.htm">John Lounsbury</a> and <a rel="”author”" href="http://econintersect.com/files/stevenhansen.htm">Steven Hansen</a></blockquote>
<img style="float: left; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-new-home1.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="117" />Another data release where the previous month was changed enough to negate that month's analysis.  In any event, last month now looks better - and new home sales volumes are up or equal for the fourth month in a row.

This continues to indicate new home sales may be at the bottom of the decline which began in 2005.

Let us start with perspective - new home sales are less than 1/4 of the peak values seen in 2005 - and are running at levels last seen in the 1970's (non seasonally adjusted data).  But still, the last 6 months have been stronger than 2010 sales.  <span id="more-19291"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19291">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ms-Vy2bXROhXroQQcEBAu6CXbUM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ms-Vy2bXROhXroQQcEBAu6CXbUM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ms-Vy2bXROhXroQQcEBAu6CXbUM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ms-Vy2bXROhXroQQcEBAu6CXbUM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/u443THINhuM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19291</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19291</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>China and the Global Crisis</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/0hjemEjvOs0/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19255#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pettis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chongqing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Ding An Hua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guangdong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guo Yuhua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liu Mingkang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael pettis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state owned enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsustainable debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19255</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>by Michael Pettis</blockquote>
<a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/China-flag4.bmp"><img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" title="China flag" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/China-flag4.bmp" alt="" /></a>This posting is from the January 30 issue of my newsletter, and so ignores recent events in Chongqing, but of course those events make my discussion of the political debate  entry all the more relevant, I think.  Before getting to the policy debate, I want to mention that in late January<em> Caixin</em>, one of my favorite magazines, had an <a href="http://english.caixin.com/2012-01-17/100349542.html">interview</a> with Liu Mingkang, former China Banking Regulation Commission chairman. In it Liu says:
<blockquote>I’ve said in the past that this economic crisis will spread from the United States to Europe and finally land in Asia. Now we can see that it’s already begun influencing Asia.</blockquote>
<span id="more-19255"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19255">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>by Michael Pettis</blockquote>
<a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/China-flag4.bmp"><img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" title="China flag" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/China-flag4.bmp" alt="" /></a>This posting is from the January 30 issue of my newsletter, and so ignores recent events in Chongqing, but of course those events make my discussion of the political debate  entry all the more relevant, I think.  Before getting to the policy debate, I want to mention that in late January<em> Caixin</em>, one of my favorite magazines, had an <a href="http://english.caixin.com/2012-01-17/100349542.html">interview</a> with Liu Mingkang, former China Banking Regulation Commission chairman. In it Liu says:
<blockquote>I’ve said in the past that this economic crisis will spread from the United States to Europe and finally land in Asia. Now we can see that it’s already begun influencing Asia.</blockquote>
<span id="more-19255"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19255">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A2m2KHxgy6jjOy1o1c7Qk73DKLY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A2m2KHxgy6jjOy1o1c7Qk73DKLY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A2m2KHxgy6jjOy1o1c7Qk73DKLY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A2m2KHxgy6jjOy1o1c7Qk73DKLY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/0hjemEjvOs0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19255</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19255</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Beijing’s Great Bailout to Defuse Ticking Local Debt Bombs</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/G6rnjYhpmts/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19246#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19246</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>By <a href="http://www.econmatters.com/search/label/EconMatters">EconMatters</a></blockquote>
In <a href="http://www.econmatters.com/2011/12/few-chinese-bad-news-bears-that-could.html">the previous post</a>, we briefly mentioned that
<blockquote><a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/China-temple1.jpg"><img style="float: left; margin: 2px;" title="China templeSMALL" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/China-templeSMALL1.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="140" /></a>"....there could be some hidden debt bombs as <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-18/china-debts-dwarf-official-data-with-too-big-to-complete-alarms.html">a recent Bloomberg finding</a> suggests that China's banks may be understating their exposure to runaway local borrowing by possibly billions of dollars that is raising fears of a government bailout."</blockquote>
Here are more details.  It appears that, based on a Bloomberg News survey, the construction boom by many local governments as part of China's stimulus program that started in November 2008 have now become too big to complete and may require a bailout even bigger than the Euro debt crisis.<span id="more-19246"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19246">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>By <a href="http://www.econmatters.com/search/label/EconMatters">EconMatters</a></blockquote>
In <a href="http://www.econmatters.com/2011/12/few-chinese-bad-news-bears-that-could.html">the previous post</a>, we briefly mentioned that
<blockquote><a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/China-temple1.jpg"><img style="float: left; margin: 2px;" title="China templeSMALL" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/China-templeSMALL1.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="140" /></a>"....there could be some hidden debt bombs as <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-18/china-debts-dwarf-official-data-with-too-big-to-complete-alarms.html">a recent Bloomberg finding</a> suggests that China's banks may be understating their exposure to runaway local borrowing by possibly billions of dollars that is raising fears of a government bailout."</blockquote>
Here are more details.  It appears that, based on a Bloomberg News survey, the construction boom by many local governments as part of China's stimulus program that started in November 2008 have now become too big to complete and may require a bailout even bigger than the Euro debt crisis.<span id="more-19246"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19246">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9t-OsW3oInUY3pRVzhhdNukS8rE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9t-OsW3oInUY3pRVzhhdNukS8rE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9t-OsW3oInUY3pRVzhhdNukS8rE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9t-OsW3oInUY3pRVzhhdNukS8rE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/G6rnjYhpmts" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19246</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19246</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Existing Home Sales: Is NAR Data Correct for January?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/hFH5V9MnCe4/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19228#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Sales and Home Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[existing home sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home inventories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national association of realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19228</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<img style="float: right;" title="z existing" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-existing.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="201" />The National Association of Realtors (NAR) completely destroyed its December 2011 existing homes sales data and analysis with their January release today - and now they are saying their January 2012 data is better.  At this point there is no doubt sales volumes are increasing - but the improvement originally conveyed in December makes the January "improvement" a step backwards.

Home sales prices too were screwed up in December - at the time it seemed strange prices were shown as increasing.   This is what we had said in our December analysis:   <span id="more-19228"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19228">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="float: right;" title="z existing" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-existing.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="201" />The National Association of Realtors (NAR) completely destroyed its December 2011 existing homes sales data and analysis with their January release today - and now they are saying their January 2012 data is better.  At this point there is no doubt sales volumes are increasing - but the improvement originally conveyed in December makes the January "improvement" a step backwards.

Home sales prices too were screwed up in December - at the time it seemed strange prices were shown as increasing.   This is what we had said in our December analysis:   <span id="more-19228"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19228">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OQja6YIEVevxD7N1jZLcyrAJmYc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OQja6YIEVevxD7N1jZLcyrAJmYc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OQja6YIEVevxD7N1jZLcyrAJmYc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OQja6YIEVevxD7N1jZLcyrAJmYc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/hFH5V9MnCe4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19228</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19228</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2012 CFNAI Shows Economy Expanding Above Historical Trend</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/2r4b9RVZ2aw/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19203#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFNAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago fed national activity index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19203</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<img style="float: left; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-cfnai.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="94" />The <a href="http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/cfnai/2012/cfnai_february2012.pdf">January 2012</a> Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) release shows the 3 month moving average of +0.14  - indicating  national economic activity was slightly above its historical trend.    The index is approximately equal to the levels one year ago, and has broken out of the range channel it has languished in for the last 8 months.

The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) is <em>Econintersect</em>’s  primary coincident indicator tool as it provides a summary quantitative  value for all the economic data being released.    The data is not spun or explained -  it is what it is.    However, this index may not be accurate in real time  (see caveats below) - and it did miss the start of the 2007 recession.<span id="more-19203"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19203">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="float: left; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-cfnai.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="94" />The <a href="http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/cfnai/2012/cfnai_february2012.pdf">January 2012</a> Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) release shows the 3 month moving average of +0.14  - indicating  national economic activity was slightly above its historical trend.    The index is approximately equal to the levels one year ago, and has broken out of the range channel it has languished in for the last 8 months.

The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) is <em>Econintersect</em>’s  primary coincident indicator tool as it provides a summary quantitative  value for all the economic data being released.    The data is not spun or explained -  it is what it is.    However, this index may not be accurate in real time  (see caveats below) - and it did miss the start of the 2007 recession.<span id="more-19203"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19203">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tGhVkpGfTsEGMxwcGvenqDw-IKk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tGhVkpGfTsEGMxwcGvenqDw-IKk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tGhVkpGfTsEGMxwcGvenqDw-IKk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tGhVkpGfTsEGMxwcGvenqDw-IKk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/2r4b9RVZ2aw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19203</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19203</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Out of the Garden of Europe and into the World Economy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/3O4G5rX7Fp0/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19178#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economic data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroeconomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macrotides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slowdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19178</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p class="Default" style="line-height: 115%;">by Macrotides</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="Default" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 13.5pt; line-height: 115%;">Monetary policy is a bit like watering a garden. Its nourishment is intended to foster growth and jobs, and when in full bloom, a rising standard of <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/macro-tides-logo.jpg"><img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" title="macro tides logo" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/macro-tides-logo.jpg" alt="" width="173" height="156" /></a>living for the majority of people in society. A functioning spigot (central bank) and nozzle at the end of the hose (banking system) are needed for monetary policy to water the economic garden. If either isn’t functioning properly, too much or too little water will flow from the financial system into the economy. Just as too much water can kill a healthy plant, too much money can cause inflation, erode the purchasing power of workers, and lower their standard of living. When too little money (credit) flows, economies contract, unemployment rises, and government tax revenue falls.<span id="more-19178"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19178">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p class="Default" style="line-height: 115%;">by Macrotides</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="Default" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: 13.5pt; line-height: 115%;">Monetary policy is a bit like watering a garden. Its nourishment is intended to foster growth and jobs, and when in full bloom, a rising standard of <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/macro-tides-logo.jpg"><img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" title="macro tides logo" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/macro-tides-logo.jpg" alt="" width="173" height="156" /></a>living for the majority of people in society. A functioning spigot (central bank) and nozzle at the end of the hose (banking system) are needed for monetary policy to water the economic garden. If either isn’t functioning properly, too much or too little water will flow from the financial system into the economy. Just as too much water can kill a healthy plant, too much money can cause inflation, erode the purchasing power of workers, and lower their standard of living. When too little money (credit) flows, economies contract, unemployment rises, and government tax revenue falls.<span id="more-19178"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19178">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4vF7p1D7ECq24iWXJ_dO4inrkl8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4vF7p1D7ECq24iWXJ_dO4inrkl8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4vF7p1D7ECq24iWXJ_dO4inrkl8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4vF7p1D7ECq24iWXJ_dO4inrkl8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/3O4G5rX7Fp0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19178</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19178</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Mortgage Settlement Plan is More Bank Bailout</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/Ge6ct_7lqm0/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19164#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banana republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations and regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yves Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19164</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>Guest Author:</strong> Yves Smith, author of the best seller <em>"Econned"</em> and founder of the widely read blog<em> </em><a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/"><em>Naked Capitalism</em></a>, where this article first appeared with the title: <em> </em><a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/02/quelle-surprise-taxpayers-will-be-paying-for-part-of-mortgage-settlement.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29">Quelle Surprise! Taxpayers Will Be Paying for Part of Mortgage Settlement</a></blockquote>
<img style="float: left; margin-left: 6px; margin-right: 6px;" title="z temp" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/z-temp.jpeg" alt="" width="150" height="201" />The whole purpose of a settlement is that a party pays damages to rid themselves of liability, and the amount they pay (and “pay” can include the cost of reforming their conduct) is less than what they expect to suffer if they were sued and lost the case (otherwise, it would make more sense for them to fight).

But in the topsy-turvy world of cream for the banks, crumbs for the rest of us, we have, in the words of Scott Simon, head of the mortgage business at bond fund manager Pimco, <a href="http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/pimco-foreclosure-banks-pensions/2012/02/10/id/429048">in an interview with MoneyNews</a>, lots of victims paying for banks’ misdeeds:<span id="more-19164"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19164">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>Guest Author:</strong> Yves Smith, author of the best seller <em>"Econned"</em> and founder of the widely read blog<em> </em><a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/"><em>Naked Capitalism</em></a>, where this article first appeared with the title: <em> </em><a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/02/quelle-surprise-taxpayers-will-be-paying-for-part-of-mortgage-settlement.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29">Quelle Surprise! Taxpayers Will Be Paying for Part of Mortgage Settlement</a></blockquote>
<img style="float: left; margin-left: 6px; margin-right: 6px;" title="z temp" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/z-temp.jpeg" alt="" width="150" height="201" />The whole purpose of a settlement is that a party pays damages to rid themselves of liability, and the amount they pay (and “pay” can include the cost of reforming their conduct) is less than what they expect to suffer if they were sued and lost the case (otherwise, it would make more sense for them to fight).

But in the topsy-turvy world of cream for the banks, crumbs for the rest of us, we have, in the words of Scott Simon, head of the mortgage business at bond fund manager Pimco, <a href="http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/pimco-foreclosure-banks-pensions/2012/02/10/id/429048">in an interview with MoneyNews</a>, lots of victims paying for banks’ misdeeds:<span id="more-19164"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19164">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IbGRuRralSHBTF2oFVVKm9EMzYI/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IbGRuRralSHBTF2oFVVKm9EMzYI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IbGRuRralSHBTF2oFVVKm9EMzYI/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IbGRuRralSHBTF2oFVVKm9EMzYI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/Ge6ct_7lqm0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19164</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19164</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Less Growth Seen on Business Green Shoot</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/sxvNENg_DFc/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=18939#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail & Business Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Economic Summary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=18939</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<img style="float: right;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/z-weekly2.jpg" alt="" />Greece continues to screw up the economic landscape.

The unanswerable question remains how Greece will default.  Greece (<a href="http://econintersect.com/b2evolution/blog2.php/2012/02/10/euro-crisis-bandaids-continue-when-surgery-is-needed">as well as its weak sisters</a>) cannot survive without an overhaul of the basic structure of the Eurozone.  No talks are underway to reform the basic Eurozone structure - only continuing efforts to slash budgets which will intensify the death spiral.  It amazes me at the market continuing to react to "good" Eurozone news.    There is no good news - only bad news in various degrees.<span id="more-18939"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=18939">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="float: right;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/z-weekly2.jpg" alt="" />Greece continues to screw up the economic landscape.

The unanswerable question remains how Greece will default.  Greece (<a href="http://econintersect.com/b2evolution/blog2.php/2012/02/10/euro-crisis-bandaids-continue-when-surgery-is-needed">as well as its weak sisters</a>) cannot survive without an overhaul of the basic structure of the Eurozone.  No talks are underway to reform the basic Eurozone structure - only continuing efforts to slash budgets which will intensify the death spiral.  It amazes me at the market continuing to react to "good" Eurozone news.    There is no good news - only bad news in various degrees.<span id="more-18939"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=18939">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ahSM5R-Tvx0A6JdS8fKOjghsxoY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ahSM5R-Tvx0A6JdS8fKOjghsxoY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ahSM5R-Tvx0A6JdS8fKOjghsxoY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ahSM5R-Tvx0A6JdS8fKOjghsxoY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/sxvNENg_DFc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=18939</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=18939</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2012 Consumer Price Index Moderates, But Core Inflation Rises</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/Ej6g1bVY8pk/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19129#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Short</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Prices - PPI, CPI and More]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisor Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dshort.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finished goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[producer prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19129</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<img style="float: left; margin-left: 6px; margin-right: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-cpi.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="160" />
<blockquote>by Steven Hansen and Doug Short</blockquote>
The Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) annual inflation rate fell to 2.9% in <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf">January 2012</a> from 3.0% in December.  This was above the <em>Econintersect</em> <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19086">expectation</a> of 2.5%. Core inflation (CPI less food and energy) was rose slightly to 2.3% annual inflation [note that the Federal Reserve uses 2.0% core inflation as an inflation target].

There has been some hinting at the Fed that inflationary targets may be flexible at this time with so much economic slack, and the Fed <a href="http://econintersect.com/b2evolution/blog1.php/2012/02/15/january-2012-fomc-meeting-statement-adding-context-to-meeting-statement">statements</a> continue to indicate they expect inflation to recede in the coming months.   <span id="more-19129"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19129">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="float: left; margin-left: 6px; margin-right: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-cpi.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="160" />
<blockquote>by Steven Hansen and Doug Short</blockquote>
The Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) annual inflation rate fell to 2.9% in <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf">January 2012</a> from 3.0% in December.  This was above the <em>Econintersect</em> <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19086">expectation</a> of 2.5%. Core inflation (CPI less food and energy) was rose slightly to 2.3% annual inflation [note that the Federal Reserve uses 2.0% core inflation as an inflation target].

There has been some hinting at the Fed that inflationary targets may be flexible at this time with so much economic slack, and the Fed <a href="http://econintersect.com/b2evolution/blog1.php/2012/02/15/january-2012-fomc-meeting-statement-adding-context-to-meeting-statement">statements</a> continue to indicate they expect inflation to recede in the coming months.   <span id="more-19129"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19129">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/cqJff4Mln70wPiRxubI55DuQZLg/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/cqJff4Mln70wPiRxubI55DuQZLg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/cqJff4Mln70wPiRxubI55DuQZLg/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/cqJff4Mln70wPiRxubI55DuQZLg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/Ej6g1bVY8pk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19129</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19129</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2012 Leading Economic Index Forecasts Improving Economy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/SxNCKCiyD4Y/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19139#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic indicator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19139</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<img style="float: right; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-lei1.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="170" />This is the second month of the "new" Leading Economic Index from The Conference Board, and after a month of review this index appears to be a significant tool useful for long-range outlook economic forecasts.
<blockquote>The Conference Board Leading Economic Index® (LEI) for the U.S. increased 0.4 percent in January to 94.9 (2004 = 100), following a 0.5 percent increase in December and a 0.3 percent increase in November.</blockquote>
This index is designed to forecast the economy six months in advance.  Additional comments from the economists at The Conference Board add context to this positive outlook.  <span id="more-19139"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19139">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="float: right; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-lei1.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="170" />This is the second month of the "new" Leading Economic Index from The Conference Board, and after a month of review this index appears to be a significant tool useful for long-range outlook economic forecasts.
<blockquote>The Conference Board Leading Economic Index® (LEI) for the U.S. increased 0.4 percent in January to 94.9 (2004 = 100), following a 0.5 percent increase in December and a 0.3 percent increase in November.</blockquote>
This index is designed to forecast the economy six months in advance.  Additional comments from the economists at The Conference Board add context to this positive outlook.  <span id="more-19139"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19139">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/THPR4QBcGxrWz_bo0-WrqJMWpDY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/THPR4QBcGxrWz_bo0-WrqJMWpDY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/THPR4QBcGxrWz_bo0-WrqJMWpDY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/THPR4QBcGxrWz_bo0-WrqJMWpDY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/SxNCKCiyD4Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19139</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19139</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Container Movements Show Flat Start to 2012</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/j5So_PIjq1E/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19121#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[container]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19121</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<img style="float: left; margin-left: 6px; margin-top: 10px; margin-right: 6px;" title="z container" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/z-container.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="121" />Combined imports and export container shipment growth was literally zero year-over-year at the Ports of LA and Long Beach in January 2012. This is a flat start for the new year.

Exports (which are an indicator of competitiveness and global economic growth) slightly contracted for the second time since August 2010.

<span id="more-19121"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19121">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="float: left; margin-left: 6px; margin-top: 10px; margin-right: 6px;" title="z container" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/z-container.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="121" />Combined imports and export container shipment growth was literally zero year-over-year at the Ports of LA and Long Beach in January 2012. This is a flat start for the new year.

Exports (which are an indicator of competitiveness and global economic growth) slightly contracted for the second time since August 2010.

<span id="more-19121"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19121">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jfp-nleDahxQqur5wm4gXeSUhE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jfp-nleDahxQqur5wm4gXeSUhE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jfp-nleDahxQqur5wm4gXeSUhE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jfp-nleDahxQqur5wm4gXeSUhE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/j5So_PIjq1E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19121</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19121</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>February 2012 Philly Fed Survey Improves Slightly</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/YslInNSuoZs/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19092#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail & Business Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19092</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" title="philly fed headquarters" src="http://www.philadelphiafed.org/about-the-fed/_images/philadelphia-fed-exterior.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="117" />

The Philly Fed Business Outlook Survey headlines for February 2012  show the index again improved slightly - and it remains in expansion territory.  Survey components new orders and unfilled orders have improved - with both now in expansion territory.
<blockquote>Responses from manufacturing firms polled for this month’s Business Outlook Survey suggest that regional manufacturing activity continued to expand in February. The survey’s broad indicators for general activity, new orders, and shipments all increased from their readings in January. Firms reported near-steady employment levels but an increase in average work hours. More firms reported higher input prices this month, and a sizable share of firms reported price increases for their own manufactured goods. The survey’s broad indicators of future activity fell from levels in recent months but continue to reflect optimism about future manufacturing growth.</blockquote>
<span id="more-19092"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19092">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" title="philly fed headquarters" src="http://www.philadelphiafed.org/about-the-fed/_images/philadelphia-fed-exterior.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="117" />

The Philly Fed Business Outlook Survey headlines for February 2012  show the index again improved slightly - and it remains in expansion territory.  Survey components new orders and unfilled orders have improved - with both now in expansion territory.
<blockquote>Responses from manufacturing firms polled for this month’s Business Outlook Survey suggest that regional manufacturing activity continued to expand in February. The survey’s broad indicators for general activity, new orders, and shipments all increased from their readings in January. Firms reported near-steady employment levels but an increase in average work hours. More firms reported higher input prices this month, and a sizable share of firms reported price increases for their own manufactured goods. The survey’s broad indicators of future activity fell from levels in recent months but continue to reflect optimism about future manufacturing growth.</blockquote>
<span id="more-19092"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19092">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kVy8Y2Fs8LhCzedh13R1giKSxls/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kVy8Y2Fs8LhCzedh13R1giKSxls/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kVy8Y2Fs8LhCzedh13R1giKSxls/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kVy8Y2Fs8LhCzedh13R1giKSxls/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/YslInNSuoZs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19092</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19092</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>PPI Continued to Moderate in January 2012</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/trQEJrrGawE/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19086#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Prices - PPI, CPI and More]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finished goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[producer prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19086</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[The Producer Price Index (PPI) finished goods prices increased <img style="float: left; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-ppi.png" alt="" width="170" height="135" />4.1% year-over-year in January 2012 (less than the 4.8% in December) - and increased 0.1% month-over-month.    The PPI represents inflation pressure that could move into consumer prices - and the PPI continues to moderate.

PPI finished goods also  is showing moderating pressures from intermediate goods and crude goods price inflation - in fact the differential in the producer price chain has almost disappeared.  The market had been expecting a 0.3% month-over-month increase in finished goods prices (compared to the 0.1% increase).

<span id="more-19086"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19086">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Producer Price Index (PPI) finished goods prices increased <img style="float: left; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-ppi.png" alt="" width="170" height="135" />4.1% year-over-year in January 2012 (less than the 4.8% in December) - and increased 0.1% month-over-month.    The PPI represents inflation pressure that could move into consumer prices - and the PPI continues to moderate.

PPI finished goods also  is showing moderating pressures from intermediate goods and crude goods price inflation - in fact the differential in the producer price chain has almost disappeared.  The market had been expecting a 0.3% month-over-month increase in finished goods prices (compared to the 0.1% increase).

<span id="more-19086"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19086">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yJ8bfIj1ehfGhBuCusziCDPIIXI/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yJ8bfIj1ehfGhBuCusziCDPIIXI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yJ8bfIj1ehfGhBuCusziCDPIIXI/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yJ8bfIj1ehfGhBuCusziCDPIIXI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/trQEJrrGawE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19086</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19086</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2012 Building Permits Indicates 2012 Will Be a Good Year</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/APX_8Wluhd8/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19079#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new home completions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new housing construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Hansen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19079</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-permits2.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="127" />Residential building permits and construction completions in January 2012  show the industry rebound is continuing - and it is being fueled this month by both single family and apartments (structures with 5 or more units).

<a href="http://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/USESAEI/2012/02/16/file_attachments/95972/New%2BResidential%2BConstruction%2B%2528January%2B2012%2529.pdf">US Census Headlines</a>:
<ul>
	<li>building permit <strong>up</strong> 0.7% month-over-month, <strong>up</strong> 19.0% year-over-year</li>
	<li>construction completions <strong>down</strong> 12.0% month-over-month, <strong>up</strong> 4.1% year-over-year</li>
	<li>the market expected 650K to 675K annualized housing permits versus the 676K reported</li>
</ul>
<em>Econintersect</em> Analysis:
<ul>
	<li> Building permits are <strong>up</strong> 20.4% month-over-month, <strong>up</strong> 27.2% year-over-year.</li>
	<li>construction completions are <strong>down</strong> 4.7% month-over-month, <strong>up</strong> 2.3% year-over-year.</li>
</ul>
<span id="more-19079"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19079">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img style="float: right; margin: 6px;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/z-permits2.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="127" />Residential building permits and construction completions in January 2012  show the industry rebound is continuing - and it is being fueled this month by both single family and apartments (structures with 5 or more units).

<a href="http://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/USESAEI/2012/02/16/file_attachments/95972/New%2BResidential%2BConstruction%2B%2528January%2B2012%2529.pdf">US Census Headlines</a>:
<ul>
	<li>building permit <strong>up</strong> 0.7% month-over-month, <strong>up</strong> 19.0% year-over-year</li>
	<li>construction completions <strong>down</strong> 12.0% month-over-month, <strong>up</strong> 4.1% year-over-year</li>
	<li>the market expected 650K to 675K annualized housing permits versus the 676K reported</li>
</ul>
<em>Econintersect</em> Analysis:
<ul>
	<li> Building permits are <strong>up</strong> 20.4% month-over-month, <strong>up</strong> 27.2% year-over-year.</li>
	<li>construction completions are <strong>down</strong> 4.7% month-over-month, <strong>up</strong> 2.3% year-over-year.</li>
</ul>
<span id="more-19079"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19079">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Nvz-pNsAZonc8UQV0ngzLfMg0cA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Nvz-pNsAZonc8UQV0ngzLfMg0cA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Nvz-pNsAZonc8UQV0ngzLfMg0cA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Nvz-pNsAZonc8UQV0ngzLfMg0cA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/APX_8Wluhd8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19079</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19079</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>USA Home Prices and Rents Climbing in February 2012</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~3/ZQYqR6l20iw/</link>
		<comments>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19044#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Sales and Home Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Sambucci]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19044</guid>

		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>by Guest Author Scott Sambucci, <a href="http://www.altosresearch.com/">Altos Research</a></blockquote>
<h3>"<em>The latest home prices data shows that a stable <img style="float: left;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/z-altos.png" alt="" width="170" height="170" />market in January is leading to an up month in February.  Rents and newly listed property prices all climbing weekly</em>."</h3>
Like Giants fans around the country still celebrating a big win, the housing markets seem to want to play the role of the triumphant underdog. Rolling into February 2012, the housing market has a set of reasonably bullish signals. But is it too early to celebrate?<span id="more-19044"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19044">Read more &raquo;</a> ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>by Guest Author Scott Sambucci, <a href="http://www.altosresearch.com/">Altos Research</a></blockquote>
<h3>"<em>The latest home prices data shows that a stable <img style="float: left;" src="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/z-altos.png" alt="" width="170" height="170" />market in January is leading to an up month in February.  Rents and newly listed property prices all climbing weekly</em>."</h3>
Like Giants fans around the country still celebrating a big win, the housing markets seem to want to play the role of the triumphant underdog. Rolling into February 2012, the housing market has a set of reasonably bullish signals. But is it too early to celebrate?<span id="more-19044"></span> &nbsp; <a href="http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19044">Read more &raquo;</a> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IhlnNT_aEjNoxH9_sHIVeGvKp98/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IhlnNT_aEjNoxH9_sHIVeGvKp98/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IhlnNT_aEjNoxH9_sHIVeGvKp98/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IhlnNT_aEjNoxH9_sHIVeGvKp98/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GlobalEconomicIntersection/~4/ZQYqR6l20iw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	
		<wfw:commentRss>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19044</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=19044</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Served from: econintersect.com @ 2012-02-28 06:33:13 by W3 Total Cache -->

