<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991</id><updated>2009-11-09T03:07:40.793+11:00</updated><title type="text">Global Warming Watch</title><subtitle type="html">This blog is currently heating up at an average of 0.2°C per decade. Come back often. | &lt;a href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/rss.xml"&gt;RSS&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/atom.xml"&gt;Atom&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/GlobalWarmingWatch"&gt;Feedburner&lt;/a&gt; |</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>653</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/GlobalWarmingWatch" type="application/atom+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-2182803273104362325</id><published>2009-11-07T23:49:00.005+11:00</published><updated>2009-11-08T00:44:04.545+11:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Climate for Kids" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Global Warming Awareness" /><title type="text">How to tell your child about global warming</title><summary type="text">I've been grappling with how and when to tell my six years old about man-made global warming, its claimed effect on his climate, and the implications for his world when he is my age. He has natural interest in weather events, and can tell me the geographic differences between tornadoes, cyclones and hurricanes, for example. Knowing he has gleaned all this under his own steam, driven by his own </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/2182803273104362325/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=2182803273104362325&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2182803273104362325" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2182803273104362325" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/Q_D4Kdx9zmA/how-to-tell-your-child-about-global.html" title="How to tell your child about global warming" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/how-to-tell-your-child-about-global.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-7860631524797268535</id><published>2009-11-07T21:09:00.006+11:00</published><updated>2009-11-07T23:24:51.025+11:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Denialists" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Copenhagen" /><title type="text">Shrinking ozone hole heralds success of global treaties</title><summary type="text">In 1987 the world came together via the UN, and signed the historic Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer. The participating countries passed legislation banning industry from using chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), hydrochloroflourocarbon (HCFC) and other ozone depleting substances. CFCs, scientists told us in peer-review research, gobble up the ozone layer by releasing chlorine </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/7860631524797268535/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=7860631524797268535&amp;isPopup=true" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/7860631524797268535" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/7860631524797268535" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/k8iLNLB4UwM/shrinking-ozone-hole-heralds-success-of.html" title="Shrinking ozone hole heralds success of global treaties" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/shrinking-ozone-hole-heralds-success-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-5745203541337418801</id><published>2009-11-06T23:03:00.004+11:00</published><updated>2009-11-07T00:28:07.035+11:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Green consumer" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Corporate Responsibility" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Energy Innovation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Energy efficiency" /><title type="text">All power to you, Google!</title><summary type="text">My leprechaun friend, below, tells me that it's motivated, grass-root ideas that are going to create the groundswell needed for meaningful change at the level where it has to happen — the consumer.I would rather throw my lot in with a market-signalling coalition of the good-willing than all the vapid international treaties and lobby-bruised politicians in the world. And Google PowerMeter now </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/5745203541337418801/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=5745203541337418801&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/5745203541337418801" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/5745203541337418801" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/N7J0LFfmbu4/all-power-to-you-google.html" title="All power to you, Google!" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_tadH5eSBLHM/SvQXiZKzPkI/AAAAAAAAADA/PtP242XoKQU/s72-c/leprechaun.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/all-power-to-you-google.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-2879833910697079791</id><published>2009-11-06T17:10:00.011+11:00</published><updated>2009-11-06T22:39:26.084+11:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Denialists" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Politics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Skeptics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Kevin Rudd" /><title type="text">About f'king time, Mr Rudd</title><summary type="text">Respectfully, you should have been using this sort of hard language to publicly out and route these most insidious AGW deniers (not sceptics ~ sceptics form their views based on the peer-reviewed evidence) in the Liberal party, a lot earlier. We've already seen how many political cowards in the Liberal Party snuck across into the denier camp as the public bought your you-are-doing-something and </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/2879833910697079791/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=2879833910697079791&amp;isPopup=true" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2879833910697079791" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2879833910697079791" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/Vi3zBCF-9R8/about-time-mr-rudd.html" title="About f'king time, Mr Rudd" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/about-time-mr-rudd.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-4268366108056971609</id><published>2009-11-02T01:10:00.004+11:00</published><updated>2009-11-02T01:26:15.669+11:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Denialists" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="War on Science" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bolt" /><title type="text">Thought Experiment: Getting hot feet over cool headedness</title><summary type="text">In response to this:Sydney is warm in theory, thoughAndrew BoltMonday, November 02, 2009 at 12:09amStill waiting for that warming:SYDNEYSIDERS are repacking their winter woollies after the coldest October in 17 years.I left this:Imagine getting into a bathtub half filled with water at body temperature. Turn on the hot water tap so there is a little pressure, but not enough to scald you and lay </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/4268366108056971609/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=4268366108056971609&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4268366108056971609" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4268366108056971609" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/ax7coQPouLg/thought-experiment-getting-hot-feet.html" title="Thought Experiment: Getting hot feet over cool headedness" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/thought-experiment-getting-hot-feet.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-3547804953326703679</id><published>2009-10-27T23:17:00.005+11:00</published><updated>2009-10-27T23:57:22.260+11:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="War on Science" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Research" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Global Cooling" /><title type="text">Last 10 years period warmest on modern record</title><summary type="text">The AGW denier canard that the earth has been cooling since 1998 is taken apart by Seth Borenstein in AJC.The case that the Earth might be cooling partly stems from recent weather. Last year was cooler than previous years. It's been a while since the super-hot years of 1998 and 2005. So is this a longer climate trend or just weather's normal ups and downs?In a blind test, the AP gave temperature </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/3547804953326703679/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=3547804953326703679&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/3547804953326703679" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/3547804953326703679" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/d9Qwef3JA1c/last-10-years-period-warmest-on-modern.html" title="Last 10 years period warmest on modern record" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/10/last-10-years-period-warmest-on-modern.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1108508322438511149</id><published>2009-10-25T22:52:00.007+11:00</published><updated>2009-10-26T01:06:08.062+11:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="United States" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="War on Science" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Copenhagen" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Barrack Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Climate Change Bill" /><title type="text">Glasses charged for Copenhagen</title><summary type="text">I don't like admitting it because I'm a glass-half-full guy, but, right now, the political climate change world is wobbling some.In Australia, we have a Government that is finally negotiating Carbon Pollution Reductions Scheme bill amendments with an opposition determined to destroy itself for their claque of Carbon Pollution Freedom Scheme lobbyists, in an agonisingly slow-mo train crash over </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/1108508322438511149/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=1108508322438511149&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/1108508322438511149" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/1108508322438511149" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/a4kXZ0Cy3Tg/glasses-charged-for-copenhagen.html" title="Glasses charged for Copenhagen" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/10/glasses-charged-for-copenhagen.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1179720036849833529</id><published>2009-09-01T22:11:00.004+10:00</published><updated>2009-09-01T22:52:21.247+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="War on Science" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Activism" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Books" /><title type="text">What's the worse that could happen?</title><summary type="text">Greg Craven is the guy who injected himself into the AGW deniers propaganda war two years ago, with a simple risk analysis grid pointing out the obvious — that, if the scientists are wrong, the worst that could happen is that we move to a carbon free economy sooner in our history than otherwise, but if the AGW deniers are wrong (ie. the scientists are right), we are toast. Then he did not sleep </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/1179720036849833529/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=1179720036849833529&amp;isPopup=true" title="14 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/1179720036849833529" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/1179720036849833529" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/0vlEGEGvYuE/whats-worse-that-could-happen.html" title="What's the worse that could happen?" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">14</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/09/whats-worse-that-could-happen.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-6591670866915527232</id><published>2009-07-08T22:20:00.005+10:00</published><updated>2009-07-09T00:38:02.951+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Climate Blogosphere" /><title type="text">Climate changlings news</title><summary type="text">The climate blogosphere is ticking over: At Deltoid, Tim Lambert takes Chilinger and Pielke (Sr) to task for their latest crimes against deductive reasoning and statistics, respectively. Marvel at the desperation of the deniers' arguments, all relying on the poor scientific understanding of the average person to sound plausable, none of it on hard science.With usual eruditon, Barry Brooks covers </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/6591670866915527232/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=6591670866915527232&amp;isPopup=true" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/6591670866915527232" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/6591670866915527232" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/TDykhQsZF4M/climate-changlings-news.html" title="Climate changlings news" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/07/climate-changlings-news.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-8803770901135619850</id><published>2009-06-15T22:06:00.002+10:00</published><updated>2009-06-15T22:23:32.727+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Denialists" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Politics" /><title type="text">Who would have tipped that Tip would tip?</title><summary type="text">Staunch to the last:Andrew Bolt         Monday,  June 15, 2009 at 02:53pmNice profile on the (perhaps) next member for Higgins. I suspect, however, that Peter Costello will make the impressive John Roskam wait.               UPDATE   No sooner predicted than contradicted. Roskam is as startled by the news as am I:  PETER Costello has finally put an end to speculation about his future, confirming </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/8803770901135619850/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=8803770901135619850&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/8803770901135619850" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/8803770901135619850" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/TDnLFmSmqX8/who-would-have-tipped-that-tip-would.html" title="Who would have tipped that Tip would tip?" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/06/who-would-have-tipped-that-tip-would.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1755757707214568722</id><published>2009-06-14T21:48:00.010+10:00</published><updated>2009-06-14T22:42:19.225+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Research" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="climate sensitivity" /><title type="text">1 tonne of co2 equals 0.0000000000015 °C of global warming</title><summary type="text">From my unscientific understanding, if the latest findings of Damon Matthews, a professor in Concordia University's Department of Geography, Planning and the Environment bear out, then the public understanding of AGW will have it's smoking gun. Matthews and his colleagues claim to have found a direct relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and global warming.The latest edition of Nature, </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/1755757707214568722/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=1755757707214568722&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/1755757707214568722" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/1755757707214568722" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/aZ5edGkytok/1-tonne-of-co2-equals-00000000000015.html" title="1 tonne of co2 equals 0.0000000000015 °C of global warming" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/06/1-tonne-of-co2-equals-00000000000015.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-4930651345874150462</id><published>2009-06-14T19:43:00.003+10:00</published><updated>2009-06-14T20:05:32.653+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ETS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Energy Policy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Australian Labor Government" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Politics" /><title type="text">Australia's climate bill may be scuttled</title><summary type="text">The ETS circus plays on:Australian Greens climate change spokeswoman Christine Milne said the Government would also have no alternative but to reverse its plan to link passage of the emissions bill to renewable energy measures."The [emissions trading] bill will be defeated. There is no question about that," she told ABC Television."The Government hasn't been able to reach a compromise with the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/4930651345874150462/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=4930651345874150462&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4930651345874150462" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4930651345874150462" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/oWpu_4Kt61M/australias-climate-bill-may-be-scuttled.html" title="Australia's climate bill may be scuttled" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/06/australias-climate-bill-may-be-scuttled.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-2856556790105043722</id><published>2009-06-13T23:29:00.004+10:00</published><updated>2009-06-14T00:03:49.373+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Carbon Emissions Trading" /><title type="text">Crime will organise to go green</title><summary type="text">So suggest sooths spotted by Desmogblog.Just in time for the rocked Australian biker club scene, desperate as they are to rehabilitate their public image after the Sydney Airport brawl showed them up to be the mongrels they are.Future Banditos and Notorious meetings to resolve grievances will be so much more in line with public sensibilities: The fat biker wog turns to the skinny biker wog, "You </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/2856556790105043722/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=2856556790105043722&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2856556790105043722" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2856556790105043722" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/neTgB670WRc/crime-will-organise-to-go-green.html" title="Crime will organise to go green" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/06/crime-will-organise-to-go-green.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-4442297798998357498</id><published>2009-06-13T22:39:00.004+10:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T23:22:32.873+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ETS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Denialists" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="War on Science" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Politics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Heartland Institute" /><title type="text">Fielding staring at the sun for too long</title><summary type="text">My reaction to the news of Senator Stephen Fielding coming back from attending an AGW denier's conference hosted by the Heartland Institute, is that he seeks to betray the path of ETS legislation for thirty pieces of Big Fossil-Fuel silver. My evidence? Simply that Fielding is replaying their great canard, 'It's the sun, stupid'.Professor Barry Brook's reaction is to patiently explain why the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/4442297798998357498/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=4442297798998357498&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4442297798998357498" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4442297798998357498" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/TvbLUAGmgCQ/fielding-staring-at-sun-for-too-long.html" title="Fielding staring at the sun for too long" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/06/fielding-staring-at-sun-for-too-long.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-2134027162767506854</id><published>2009-06-13T21:57:00.007+10:00</published><updated>2009-06-14T00:20:53.636+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sea Ice Extent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Arctic" /><title type="text">Punters and pundits call the Arctic Summer Melt</title><summary type="text">It's that time of the year, when types that think about these things, turn their attention to predicting what this year's lowest Arctic  sea-ice extent will be. Eli Rabbet kicks off with a rough round-up of pundits and early predictions. There are rumours of money changing hands.If none of this makes sense to you, here's the good oil from a Kiwi called Gareth of Hot Topic. And, as a GWW service </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/2134027162767506854/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=2134027162767506854&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2134027162767506854" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2134027162767506854" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/_n3D5NFXf_o/punters-and-pundits-call-arctic-summer.html" title="Punters and pundits call the Arctic Summer Melt" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/06/punters-and-pundits-call-arctic-summer.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-7853480176065425602</id><published>2009-06-11T23:13:00.003+10:00</published><updated>2009-06-11T23:31:36.076+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Kyoto Protocol" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="United States" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Copenhagen" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Climate Change Policy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Politics" /><title type="text">US Emissions Talks With China Hit Great Wall</title><summary type="text">Five months ahead of the Copenhagen talks, a round of climate talks between the world's two biggest polluters has stalled, reports the Financial Times:Chinese officials maintained that the two countries should have a “common but differentiated approach” – code for Beijing’s reluctance to adopt a formal domestic mandate to reduce its carbon emissions. The US Congress is considering a bill that </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/7853480176065425602/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=7853480176065425602&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/7853480176065425602" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/7853480176065425602" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/7InaXlaRpBs/us-emissions-talks-with-china-hit-great.html" title="US Emissions Talks With China Hit Great Wall" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/06/us-emissions-talks-with-china-hit-great.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-9000977414594362298</id><published>2009-05-27T01:20:00.006+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-27T01:38:07.760+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ETS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Energy Policy" /><title type="text">Turnbull hands Rudd ETS early election trigger — Chk Chk Boom</title><summary type="text">IMHO, everything that has gone wrong with the Liberal party has to do with their inability to maintain the bipartisan approach to a carbon cap and trade system. Turnbull used to be the one who seemed to be across the issues, but what a flip-flop, opportunistic waverer he turned out to be. How's that holding Rudd accountable?Now we got a damn election to get through. Liberals are going to get hit </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/9000977414594362298/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=9000977414594362298&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/9000977414594362298" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/9000977414594362298" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/LGpkVMZtKI4/turnbull-hands-rudd-ets-early-election.html" title="Turnbull hands Rudd ETS early election trigger — Chk Chk Boom" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/turnbull-hands-rudd-ets-early-election.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-1327721524637791564</id><published>2009-05-26T20:40:00.004+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-26T21:07:48.800+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Not global warming" /><title type="text">Australia coping best with global recession</title><summary type="text">Top 10 recession refuges:The top countries best surviving the global recession, according to a survey of 7500 businesspeople from 24 nations.1st - Australia2nd - China3rd - India and Singapore (equal)5th - Hong Kong6th - Canada7th - Japan and Qatar (equal)9th - New Zealand10th - Malaysia, Sweden and Vietnam (equal)Source: Servcorp International Business Confidence Survey.Well, there you go, who </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/1327721524637791564/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=1327721524637791564&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/1327721524637791564" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/1327721524637791564" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/IifpPtQYU6g/australia-coping-best-with-global.html" title="Australia coping best with global recession" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/australia-coping-best-with-global.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-6283786701373192461</id><published>2009-05-19T00:35:00.003+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-19T00:49:28.974+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="The Legal Consensus" /><title type="text">Do future generations have rights to a stable climate?</title><summary type="text">Recalibrating the Law of Humans with the Laws of Nature: Climate Change, Human Rights, and Intergenerational JusticeHigh ambition deserves a lofty title. The paper is the product of the University of Iowa's Centre for Human Rights and the University of Vermont's Environmental Law Centre having jointly started an initiative to seek legal protection for future generations. If today's unborn have </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/6283786701373192461/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=6283786701373192461&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/6283786701373192461" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/6283786701373192461" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/4EclvpYJN6Y/do-future-generations-have-rights-to.html" title="Do future generations have rights to a stable climate?" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/do-future-generations-have-rights-to.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-2846618079976550607</id><published>2009-05-19T00:23:00.003+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-19T00:30:48.600+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Not global warming" /><title type="text">The history of the politics of the theory of evolution</title><summary type="text">Darwinania: n. If your "interests include Darwin, politics involving Victorian-Era scientists, public perceptions of evolution, anti-evolution movements, and the history of paleontology, especially the presentations of dinosaurs in museums and scientific literature from the 1800s on", you have Darwinania. Global Warning Climate Change  Energy </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/2846618079976550607/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=2846618079976550607&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2846618079976550607" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2846618079976550607" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/y8H3im1CD9E/history-of-politics-of-theory-of.html" title="The history of the politics of the theory of evolution" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/history-of-politics-of-theory-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-7364579056353260366</id><published>2009-05-18T23:10:00.006+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-18T23:46:08.520+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Massachusettes v. EPA" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="EPA" /><title type="text">Obama's Bush holdovers attack EPA co2 ruling</title><summary type="text">An interesting insight into how the Bush government used to play its cards in thwarting EPA global warming legislation is provided by Jim Tankersley of the L.A Times:The agency's declaration that emissions pose a health danger could have 'serious economic consequences,' Bush-era holdovers in the Small Business Administration assert.Reporting from Washington -- In ruling last month that greenhouse</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/7364579056353260366/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=7364579056353260366&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/7364579056353260366" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/7364579056353260366" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/_GaSx1Yw_FU/obamas-bush-holdovers-attack-epa-co2.html" title="Obama's Bush holdovers attack EPA co2 ruling" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/obamas-bush-holdovers-attack-epa-co2.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-2084163343187772833</id><published>2009-05-18T21:17:00.009+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-18T23:57:18.267+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Denialists" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="War on Science" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Skeptics" /><title type="text">AGW denier says peer-review is a public enemy</title><summary type="text">James Dellingpole plumbs the depth of his intellect in The Spectator:I don’t bait greens only for fun. I do it because they’re public enemy number oneHow so?Here is what’s so terrifying about the modern green movement: its complete refusal to accept that anyone who disagrees with it can be anything other than wilfully perverse, certifiably insane or secretly in the pay of Big Oil.Or stupid and </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/2084163343187772833/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=2084163343187772833&amp;isPopup=true" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2084163343187772833" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/2084163343187772833" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/sT3WMCTdGlQ/agw-skeptic-says-peer-review-is-public.html" title="AGW denier says peer-review is a public enemy" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/agw-skeptic-says-peer-review-is-public.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-4433752670705182101</id><published>2009-05-13T22:46:00.004+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-13T23:17:49.554+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Denialists" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="War on Science" /><title type="text">Is Ian Plimer's Heaven and Earth a sell-out?</title><summary type="text">Well yes, considering he challenges the fundamentals of the spectrum of multidisciplinary sciences making up the body of climate science. Problem is, he won't do this in the peer-reviewed literature.But has it really sold out of its 25,000 print run, as claimed by Andrew Bolt? Not according to Tim Lambert of Deltoid, whose mate reckons it's more like probably around~3700. Global Warning Climate </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/4433752670705182101/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=4433752670705182101&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4433752670705182101" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4433752670705182101" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/AugNivKKuv8/is-ian-plimers-heaven-and-earth-sell.html" title="Is Ian Plimer's Heaven and Earth a sell-out?" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/is-ian-plimers-heaven-and-earth-sell.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-4790113017763044065</id><published>2009-05-13T21:54:00.004+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-13T22:32:46.063+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Global Warming Solutions" /><title type="text">Reduced emissions with increased productivity</title><summary type="text">In the search for every-day global warming solutions, Eli of Rabett Run suggests that cheap is good. Think low-tech solutions for everyday tasks.Consider where the costs and problems associated with reducing carbon emissions comes from, from having to transform a dispersed, costless source of energy such as wind or solar or geothermal, into a form which can be centrally distributed to cover all </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/4790113017763044065/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=4790113017763044065&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4790113017763044065" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/4790113017763044065" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/H3dLKWyKn1Q/in-search-for-every-day-global-warming.html" title="Reduced emissions with increased productivity" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-search-for-every-day-global-warming.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18192991.post-8658495438442227059</id><published>2009-05-13T20:12:00.007+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-13T21:27:27.154+10:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Australian Labor Government" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Politics" /><title type="text">Government ETS delay: A back-flip to the future</title><summary type="text">I don't know what to think about the Australian Government's 2011 back-flip on the starting date of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme.The economy is going sideways. This means fewer carbon emissions caused by lower productivity. A delayed introduction will help businesses by delaying compliance costs, but it is only a delay. And, we miss the chance to go to Copenhagen and negotiate with more </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/feeds/8658495438442227059/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18192991&amp;postID=8658495438442227059&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/8658495438442227059" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/18192991/posts/default/8658495438442227059" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GlobalWarmingWatch/~3/oBrLkqTs_cM/i-dont-know-what-to-think-about.html" title="Government ETS delay: A back-flip to the future" /><author><name>Wadard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07900339523864136167</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="09033547779966255225" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/i-dont-know-what-to-think-about.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
