<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" --><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>GuruFocus Updates</title>
        <description>GuruFocus tracks the stock picks of Warren Buffett, George Soros and other guru investors</description>
        <link>http://www.gurufocus.com</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:46:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        
        <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/GurufocusForum" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
            <title>Re: Klarman Buying RHIE today on 60% drop?</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/mX7QKOqdPgw/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I found the purchase of ENZN on sec.gov so nevermind on that question.<br />
<br />
Does anyone have any thoughts about the distribution of proceeds? Maybe Klarman's reason to buy?<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:32:52 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?1,75357,75392</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Re: Klarman Buying RHIE today on 60% drop?</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/GC2yiKvGFOQ/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[339 million of the 590million is a revolving credit line, which they have used all but 7 million. Cash is significantly down, along with revenue, which I believe caused the 60% decline. Things would of been a lot worse if it wasn't for their library revenue which accounted for 73% of revenue (yikes!) and even that decreased a significant amount. What it comes down to is their 4th quarter, which is their biggest quarter, and they spent money in order to be prepared. <br />
<br />
"As of September 30, 2009, we had $7.0 million 	available under our revolving credit facility, net of an outstanding letter of credit, subject to 	the terms and conditions of that facility. <strong>The decrease in cash reflects our production spending 	during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.</strong>" p.22<br />
<br />
Will be looking at this a bit deeper tonight<br />
<br />
<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:28:13 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?1,75357,75391</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Re: Deja Vu.... More Sears Holdings Corp. Fears.....</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/vfkDMYyJXmU/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[rat hole <br />
<br />
ED needs to buy it in and stop wasting money.<br />
<br />
SSS do not matter.<br />
<br />
ED is a genius.<br />
<br />
The retail investor will fall for any BS.<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:16:50 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?2,75385,75389</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Housing Completions</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/J5x86-62yxU/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I'd love to see similar graphs or overlays with household formation data. (ie if you were looking at retirement housing prices you'd immediately look to the numbers of retirees entering that market - same goes for housing in general.)<br />
<br />
One other thing to consider was the number of speculators in this last bubble and the timing of it - it followed an equity market bubble where burned and equity market fearing investors sought perceived the "safety" of real estate despite it history of extreme leverage. The resulting over production may last longer than past bubbles.<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:15:57 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?2,75376,75388</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Re: Klarman Buying RHIE today on 60% drop?</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/CBL4f63pHCQ/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Apijaq,<br />
<br />
Where did you get the info on Klarman buying ENZN?<br />
<br />
They look uninteresting at first glance, however, they are selling one of their units for 300M and the BOD is considering distributing most of the proceeds in a distribution. There are 45.5M shares outstanding. Am I correct to calculate that this could mean a $6.59/share one-time dividend?<br />
<br />
Thanks.<br />
<br />
<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:15:32 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?1,75357,75387</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>oil spike - chart </title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/fIAi6lE2y4U/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<a  href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/172386-don-t-believe-long-term-oil-forecasts-part-ii">http://seekingalpha.com/article/172386-don-t-believe-long-term-oil-forecasts-part-ii</a><br />
<br />
ride it up<br />
<br />
ride it down <br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:11:51 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?2,75386,75386</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Deja Vu.... More Sears Holdings Corp. Fears.....</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/CPsPy2gB8-o/news.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I addressed this <a  href="http://www.valueplays.net/2009/03/sears-balance-sheet-problem/">foolishness last year so I thought</a> I would let reader Brian do it this year. Looks like we might be able to make it an annual event.<br />
<br />
From the WSJ:<blockquote><br />
As the holidays approach, the retailer's $4.1 billion credit line should be sufficient to stock its shelves, given that it needed roughly $3 billion last year. But come March, the facility will shrink to just $2.4 billion. That could mean a dicey winter in 2010 if the economy remains tough.<br />
<br />
In that case, Sears Holdings may want to extract cash from its Canadian business. Sears Canada is one of the largest retailers in the country and continues to build cash on its balance sheet. Of the parent's $1.292 billion in gross cash, $824 million belongs to Sears Canada, its 73% subsidiary.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, Sears Holdings can't touch the Canadian cash unless it buys the entire company. It tried a deal in 2006 but was blocked by Pershing Square Capital, which owns more than half of the 27% minority stake.<br />
<br />
Since the standoff, Sears Canada has paid no dividends and let its cash sit idle. Locked in a strategic standstill, Sears Canada's shares have been depressed, trading at 12 times earnings for the year ending January 2011, according to brokerage Desjardins Securities in Toronto. Sears Holdings, meanwhile, has a multiple of 48 times consensus earnings.<br />
<br />
Sears Holdings probably can't afford to attempt another squeeze out. Sears Canada has about $500 million in net cash, but the market value of the shares that Sears Holdings doesn't own is about $600 million. Paying any premium to satisfy Pershing would leave Sears Holdings with less cash.<br />
<br />
More likely, Sears Holdings will need to shed the Canadian business. The question for investors is how long they are willing to wait.</blockquote><br />
Brian succinctly responds:<blockquote><br />
<br />
- This so called problem doesn't arrive until Fall 2010 when they ramp up for Christmas. I believe Sears will see FCF in 2009 of $500 million and 2010 of over $500 million, at least, and therefore Sears won't die if their net $1.7 billion of financing is taken away in 2010. They can stop buybacks and self finance, though it won't be necessary; someone else will provide financing if necessary (see next bullet).<br />
<br />
- I believe <a  href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName=Bruce+Berkowitz">Bruce Berkowitz</a> has said he would provide inventory financing for Sears if no one else will, though he thinks Sears can find it cheaper elsewhere.<br />
<br />
- Regarding the minority Sears Canada stake. Sears and Ackman are playing the waiting game to see who will flinch first. I don't think SHLD feels any pressure to flinch at this point. Ackman may someday realize that he isn't in control of Sears Canada and can find better returns elsewhere. Ackman can double his money every 3.5 years with the 20% returns he gets (I believe they are 20%, or more). It doesn't make sense for him to hold out forever, though he might just do it.</blockquote><br />
<br />
He adds the following note:<blockquote><br />
Craftsman tools <a  href="http://www.fastenal.com/web/products/detail.ex?sku=0230766&ucst=t">are sold at Fastenal.com</a>. I haven't checked to see if they are sold in Fastenal stores yet, they may just be sold online, but I really like this move either way. From what I understand Fastenal is a highly regarded company/brand and it's exciting to see Craftsman teaming up with another great brand when branching out of the Sears/Kmart umbrella.</blockquote><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Todd Sullivan<br />
[<a  href="http://www.valueplays.net/">www.valueplays.net</a>]<br />
<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:08:32 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/news.php?id=75385</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Re: Survivors of the Original Dividend Aristocrats index Members: Dover, Emerson Electric, ...</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/RTxIsRc_Q-4/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I don't call quadrupling your money in 10 years a failure. 1999-2000 was a unique period when value investing was mocked.<br />
<br />
<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:56:37 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?2,75377,75383</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Re: Buffett Partnership Agreement</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/KiBOEgTsgu8/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
I would appreciate it if you could send it to me as well. Thank you!<br />
<br />
go_loe@yahoo.co.in<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:54:36 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?1,14815,75382</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Liz Claman on Warren Buffett</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/MuFFLtwR9UY/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Hmmmmm.... All the "reporters" Buffett talks to have a similar quality- can't put my finger on it though....<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:54:10 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?1,75379,75381</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Re: Survivors of the Original Dividend Aristocrats index Members: Dover, Emerson Electric, ...</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/RxY7hh8EU2A/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[The first chart shows how long trends can take to develop. The S & P chart line is above the dividend A's line at the ten year mark. So in a ten year sample, this approach would have failed. <br />
<br />
I own JNJ, KO, and PG so I do believe in the long term, you will have success.<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:40:02 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?2,75377,75380</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Liz Claman on Warren Buffett</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/rosfUxtfWsQ/news.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[There are a number of speculations on this site on how <a  href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName=Warren+Buffett">Warren Buffett</a> grants access to reporters. Here is something from the source:<br />
<br />
FBN's Liz Claman on getting to know and interview Warren Buffett.<br />
<br />
<center class="bbcode"><script src="http://video.foxbusiness.com/embed.js?id=11516081&w=400&h=249"></script><noscript>Watch the latest business video at<a href="http://video.foxbusiness.com/">FOXBusiness.com</a></noscript></center><br />
<br />
<br />
Click <a  href="http://video.foxbusiness.com/#/11516081/liz-claman-on-warren-buffett/?category_id=1292d14d0e3afdcf0b31500afefb92724c08f046">here</a> to watch the video if you do not see the video player above.<br />
<br />
<br />
Here a number of videos in which Buffett interviewed by Liz Claman. Sorry for the out-of-datedness, I can't control that.<br />
<br />
<center class="bbcode"><object width="400" height="290"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Go2SvBj9tWs&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Go2SvBj9tWs&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="290"></embed></object></center><br />
<br />
<center class="bbcode"><object width="400" height="290"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/obqgzNKbimw&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/obqgzNKbimw&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="290"></embed></object></center><br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:37:22 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/news.php?id=75379</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Buffett on Gold</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/7YHVwtNCABc/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Flawed argument. How pointless is it to compare Berkshire Hathaway's book value to gold from 1964 to 1979. If my calendar is correct it is 2009. Why don't you compare book value with gold from 1964 to 2009? I can assure you that it will take you two minutes to figure out that gold is inferior in the long-run. 1964 to 1979 was also a boom period for gold and commodities and an extended bear market period for stocks, yet Berkshire Hathaway kept up with gold during one of it's strongest periods in history. I think that awards high marks to Buffett.<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:34:59 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?1,75221,75378</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Survivors of the Original Dividend Aristocrats index Members: Dover, Emerson Electric, Johnson ...</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/ZGJq7izyQVw/news.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[The <a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2008/02/why-do-i-like-dividend-aristocrats.html">Dividend Aristocrats index</a> measures the performance of S&P 500 index members that have followed a policy of consistently increasing dividends every year for at least 25 consecutive years. (Source: <a  href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.topic/indices_dai/2,3,2,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.html">S&P</a>)<br />
<br />
Since its inception 20 years ago, the dividend aristocrat's index has outperformed the S&P 500.<br />
<br />
<center class="bbcode"><a  href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9SoEE9d_aQo/SphY_Nzbv7I/AAAAAAAAB6M/eLw9orqZxDE/s1600-h/DATR.jpg"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9SoEE9d_aQo/SphY_Nzbv7I/AAAAAAAAB6M/eLw9orqZxDE/s400/DATR.jpg" /></a></center><br />
<br />
The number of components in the index has ranged between 26 in 1989 to 64 in 2001. I used this list as a primary tool for identifying companies with strong brands, which have raised distributions through both good and bad economic conditions. Check this post <a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2008/04/historical-changes-of-s-dividend.html">Historical changes of the S&P Dividend Aristocrats Index</a> for reference.<br />
<br />
Some investors believe that the reason why the index has outperformed the S&P 500 is because of new stocks that have later been added to the index. In a <a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2008/07/ultimate-passive-investment-strategy.html">previous post</a> I discussed how the list of original S&P 500 components in 1957 outperformed the index over the next 50 years.<br />
<br />
It would be interesting to note what happened to the original <a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2008/02/why-do-i-like-dividend-aristocrats.html">Dividend Aristocrats</a>. Here's a list with 26 of them from 1989. Next to each symbol is a brief outline of the events over the past 20 years, associated with each stock.<br />
<br />
<strong>American Home Products (AHP) </strong>became <strong>Wyeth (WYE)</strong> in 2002. The company was removed from the index in 2001 when it failed to increase dividends for 2 consecutive years in a row. The company began raising its distributions again in 2005. Currently it is in the process of <a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/01/pfizerwyeth-merger-arbitrage.html">being acquired</a> by drug giant Pfizer (PFE). One dollar invested in AHP in 1989 would have turned out to $5.80 with dividends reinvested by June 2009. Yield on cost is 8.9%.<br />
<br />
Fuse Maker <strong>AMP Inc (AMP) </strong>was acquired by Tyco in 1998.<br />
<br />
<strong>Baxter International (BAX) </strong>was part of the index until 1997. The company spun off Allegiance Healthcare Corporation in 1996, issuing a certain amount of stock in the new company to existing shareholders. As a result its distributions fell slightly for the past three quarters of 1997 in comparison to the same period in 1996. One dollar invested in BAX in 1989 would have turned out to $8.03 with dividends reinvested. The yield on 1989 cost is 8.3%.<br />
<br />
<strong>Colgate Palmolive (CL)</strong> was deleted in the index in 1990 for no apparent reason. According to yahoo <a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/11/where-are-original-dividend-aristocrats.html#">finance</a> the company increased its distributions in 1989. In addition to that the company's own web page claims that it has increased payments to common shareholders every year for 46 years. One dollar invested in CL in 1989 would have turned out to $16.94 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 27.70%. (<a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/06/colgate-palmolive-cl-dividend-stock.html">analysis</a>)<br />
<br />
<strong>CSR</strong> was deleted from the index in 1998. I couldn't find any additional information on this stock.<br />
<br />
<strong>Dover (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=DOV">DOV</a>)</strong>, which recently announced its 54th consecutive annual dividend increase, is still part of the index. A dollar invested in EMR in 1989 would have turned out to $5.45 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 11.6%. (<a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2008/05/dover-corp-dov-dividend-analysis.html">analysis</a>)<br />
<br />
<strong>Emerson Electric (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=EMR">EMR</a>) </strong>is still part of the index. The company has increased its dividends for 52 years in a row. One dollar invested in EMR in 1989 would have turned out to $8.17 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 17.7%. (<a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/07/emerson-electric-emr-dividend-stock.html">analysis</a>)<br />
<br />
<strong>FPL Group (FPL)</strong> was deleted from the index in 1995, after the Florida Utility cut its distributions by one third, ending a 48-year streak of dividend increases. The company resumed its policy of regular dividend increases in 1995. One dollar invested in FPL in 1989 would have turned out to $7.56 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 10.4%.<br />
<br />
<strong>Genuine Parts Co (GPC)</strong> was removed from the index in 2002. It is unclear as to why the company was booted out, since both yahoo finance and the <a  href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=98901&p=irol-drip">company's website</a> show no interruptions to the dividend increases. The company's most recent dividend increase marked 53rd consecutive years of increased dividends paid to our shareholders. A dollar invested in GPC in 1989 would have turned out to $5.20 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 12%.<br />
<br />
(HI) was acquired by HSBC in 2002. I couldn't find any information about this component.<br />
<br />
<strong>International Flavors and Fragrances (IFF)</strong> was removed from the index in 2001, after the company cut its dividends by 60% in 2000. While International Flavors and Fragrances started raising dividends in 2003, its current distribution rate is still lower than what it was in 2000. A dollar invested in IFF in 1989 would have turned out to $3.52 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 6%.<br />
<br />
<strong>Johnson & Johnson (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=JNJ">JNJ</a>),</strong> which recently announced its 47th consecutive annual dividend increase, is still part of the index. A dollar invested in JNJ in 1989 would have turned out to $10.84 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 26.4%. (<a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/03/johnson-johnson-jnj-dividend-stock.html">analysis</a>)<br />
<br />
<strong>Kellogg (K) </strong>was removed from the index in 2003 after the company failed to raise its quarterly dividend for 2.5 years in a row. Since 2005 the company has started to increase dividends once again. A dollar invested in K in 1989 would have turned out to $4.59 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 8.9%.<br />
<br />
<strong>Coca Cola (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=KO">KO</a>) </strong>is still a member of the dividend aristocrat's index. The company has increased its dividends for 47 consecutive years. A dollar invested in KO in 1989 would have turned out to $7.15 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 17%. (<a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/06/coca-cola-ko-dividend-stock-analysis.html">analysis</a>)<br />
<br />
<strong>(LDG) </strong>was booted out of the index in 1995. I couldn't find any information about this component.<br />
<br />
<strong>Lowe's Companies (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=LOW">LOW</a>)</strong> is still a component of the index after 20 years. The company has increased its dividends for 47 consecutive years. A dollar invested in MAS in 1989 would have turned out to $25.40 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 39%.<br />
<br />
<strong>Masco Corp (MAS)</strong> was booted out of the index in 1996. It is unclear as to why the company was booted out, since both yahoo finance and the <a  href="http://investors.masco.com/dividends.cfm">company's website</a> show no interruptions to the dividend increases. A dollar invested in MAS in 1989 would have turned out to $1.31 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 2.5% after the recent dividend cut; it went up to 7.7% in 2008.<br />
<br />
<strong>3M (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=MMM">MMM</a>)</strong> is one of seven original components still part of this elite dividend index. The company has consistently increased its dividends for 51 consecutive years.<br />
<br />
A dollar invested in MMM in 1989 would have turned out to $5.33 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 10.3%. (<a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/04/3m-mmm-dividend-stock-analysis.html">analysis</a>)<br />
<br />
<strong>NSI Company (NSI)</strong> was kicked out of the index in 1998. I couldn't find any information about this component.<br />
<br />
<strong>Procter & Gamble (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=PG">PG</a>) </strong>is one of the original 26 members still present in the index. The company has raised dividends for over 53 consecutive years. A dollar invested in TMK in 1989 would have turned out to $9.05 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 20%. (<a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/01/procter-gamble-pg-dividend-stock.html">analysis</a>)<br />
<br />
<strong>Parker-Hannifin (PH)</strong> only stayed in the index for one year. The company failed to increase its dividend in 1989, which is why it was kicked out of the index in the first place. A dollar invested in PH in 1989 would have turned out to $11.13 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 17%.<br />
<br />
<strong>Rubbermaid (RBD)</strong> was acquired by Newell to become Newell-Rubbermaid in 1999.<br />
<br />
<strong>Torchmark (TMK)</strong> was booted out of the index in 1996. It is unclear as to why the company was booted out, since yahoo finance shows dividend increases in 1995 and 1996. A dollar invested in TMK in 1989 would have turned out to $5.64 with dividends reinvested. The yield on cost is 4.3%.<br />
<br />
<strong>Texas Utilities Company (TXU) </strong>was a member of the index until 1994 it failed to increase its dividend for a second year in a row in 1994. The company consequently cut its distributions the next year and after a brief increase it cut them again in 2002. The dividend payments briefly returned to 1994 levels in 2005, before an investor group led by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., TPG and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners bought out the company.<br />
<br />
<strong>(WIN)</strong> was a member of the index until it <a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/11/where-are-original-dividend-aristocrats.html#">filed for chapter 11</a> bankruptcy in 1999.<br />
<br />
<strong>Warner Lambert (WLA) </strong>was a component until Pfizer acquired it in 1999.<br />
<br />
Seven of the original 26 components in the dividend aristocrat index are still part of it. The seven survivors have managed to outperform the index average over the past twenty years. <br />
<br />
<center class="bbcode"><a  href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9SoEE9d_aQo/SphZEtl0t0I/AAAAAAAAB6U/t9S10GP7MdY/s1600-h/survivors.jpg"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9SoEE9d_aQo/SphZEtl0t0I/AAAAAAAAB6U/t9S10GP7MdY/s400/survivors.jpg" /></a></center><br />
<br />
It seems that most of the companies that leave the index as a result of mergers and acquisitions. Sometimes companies take on too much <a  href="http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/11/where-are-original-dividend-aristocrats.html#">debt</a> in an acquisition, which proves costly over time, leading to freezing or cutting of the dividend payments. Blogger <a  href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/14287371479045877799">Yielder</a> notes that:<blockquote><br />
<br />
<i>"Regardless of whether a company has a long history of dividend growth, a large acquisition financed by debt is cause for alarm bells to go off. Excessive debt can choke the company especially if the new asset requires "fixing". Unless a company has a great deal of experience with acquisitions, a quick & successful integration can be a problem especially if the company being acquired involves new areas of expertise."</blockquote><span style="font-style: normal; ">It would have been next to impossible to predict which ones were to remain the index back in 1989. It would be almost impossible to predict which ones would remain in the index 20 years from now as well. However, by diversifying your risk by spreading your bets to several stocks from as many market sectors as possible, investors would have a higher chance of finding the best dividend stocks, which would generate the most returns for them for the future.</i><br />
<br />
Full Disclosure: Long PG, JNJ, MMM, EMR, KO<br />
<br />
<br />
Dividend Growth Investor<br />
[<a  href="http://www.dividedngrowthinvestor.com">www.dividedngrowthinvestor.com</a>]<br />
<br />
<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:26:15 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/news.php?id=75377</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Housing Completions</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/YuIvO_uMbtU/news.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[It's common to hear that the housing industry is in a depression, and that this type of collapse is unprecedented in American history. When one looks at house prices, which we did <a  href="http://barelkarsan.com/2008/06/are-home-prices-still-too-high.html">here</a>, one can see why. There was a huge run-up in prices, and a huge collapse as a result. Those who bought in at the height of the market are suffering now. But for the housing industry itself, the construction pattern is actually very familiar. Here's a look at US housing completions since 1968 (note that 2009 is an estimate through September):<br />
<br />
<center class="bbcode"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_n1qJVTVs-rk/SudxLR6swlI/AAAAAAAAAjs/ApT__aBBMcI/s400/housing+starts.jpg" /></center><br />
<br />
The boom and bust phenomenon in housing construction is common throughout history! But it just hasn't happened for a while, which may have fooled people into thinking this is not a highly cyclical industry. Notice that for whatever reason (e.g. cheap credit, low supply due to the fact that there was no preceding boom), there was no bust in the last recession in 2002. But current reductions in construction have caused panic levels to soar, allowing investors the <a  href="http://www.barelkarsan.com/2008/06/homebuilders-ranked-by-discount-to-book.html">option to purchase assets at great discounts</a>.<br />
<br />
While the current low levels of construction are taking a big bite out of GDP, this is necessary in order for existing inventories to be absorbed. Once supplies have been sufficiently reduced, this industry will be back. When that is, is anybody's guess, but when the market is fearful, one can find <a  href="http://www.barelkarsan.com/2009/04/goodfellow-toughs-it-out.html">companies in unfavoured industries that trade at discounts to their assets</a>, which is what value investors try to do.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Saj Karsan<br />
[<a  href="http://www.barelkarsan.com/">www.barelkarsan.com</a>]<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:13:16 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/news.php?id=75376</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>2009 Forbes 200 Best Small Companies: Lumber Liquidators, Allegiant Travel, Quality Systems, ...</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/d0PX1LIDHl4/news.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[It's finally that time of year again where I go through 200 companies that made it to <a  href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/forbes-200-best-small-companies-project/">Forbes 200 Best Small Companies</a> list.<br />
<br />
There has been a big shuffle this year with 71 companies from last year falling out of the list. The requirement is that the company have annual revenue between $5 million and $750 million, be publicly traded for at least a year and have a stock price no lower than $5.<br />
<br />
The one big issue I see with the Forbes list is that they refer to "best" as growth in sales which isn't something value investing considers.<br />
<br />
<strong>The Screening Filter</strong><br />
<br />
Since all the companies are supposedly growing and profitable, there are no net nets or other cheap stocks.<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Immediately exclude financials (outside circle of competence)<li>Run the companies through the <a href="https://www.e-junkie.com/ecom/gb.php?ii=222879&c=ib&aff=93048&cl=29772" target="ejejcsingle"><strong>Old School Value investment spreadsheet</strong></a> with the PE as the growth rate, but capped at 15%. The selected companies shall exhibit;<blockquote><br />
- Positive, consistent and growing cash flows.<br />
- Consistent margins. Fluctuating/decreasing margins over several years will not be accepted unless the other criterias are outstanding. Above average returns from capital investments (CROIC, ROE, ROA)<br />
- Strong balance sheet</blockquote><br />
<li>Companies should have <strong><i>at least</i></strong> 5 years of operating history</ul><br />
<br />
<strong>The List of Companies</strong><br />
<br />
I'll only be going through and commenting on each of the first 10 companies in this initial post. Future posts will only discuss fundamentally good companies.<br />
<br />
<strong>1. Lumber Liquidators (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=LL">LL</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote>Specialty retailer of hardwood flooring.<br />
<br />
Too short history but the company makes good FCF and excellent CROIC. Looks to be trading a big premium with the growth it has exhibited but a company to keep an eye on should prices fall one day.<br />
<br />
<strong>DCF Calculation</strong>: $14.31<br />
<br />
<strong>Graham Formula Calculation:</strong> $11.32<br />
<br />
<strong>EPV</strong>: $12.71</blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>2. Allegiant Travel (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=ALGT">ALGT</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote>Operates a low-cost airline serving resort locales such as Las Vegas and Orlando.<br />
Never liked airline companies. Top line may have increased but bottom line is still weak with barely any FCF consistency or growth.<br />
<br />
<strong>DCF Calculation</strong>: $14<br />
<br />
<strong>Graham Formula Calculation:</strong> $18.71<br />
<br />
<strong>EPV</strong>: N/A</blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>3. Quality Systems (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=QSII">QSII</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote>Creates software designed to automate and streamline administrative functions required for operating a medical or dental practices. My previous <a  href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/stock-analysis/quality-systems-inc-qsii-is-a-quality-company/">analysis of QSII</a> showed how much I was wrong. My intrinsic value estimate was between $22-$36 while it is now trading at $63. QSII continues to grow at an amazing pace on both the top and bottom line.<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Awesome FCF generation, CROIC, ROA, ROE with zero long term debt<li>It's growing at such a fast organic rate that I feel uncomfortable in trying to value the company as I have no way of knowing how long this growth will continue.</ul></blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>4. LHC Group (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=LHCG">LHCG</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote><strong>Provides post-acute health care services to patients through its home nursing agencies, hospices and long-term acute care hospitals.<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Big drop in tangible shareholders equity<li>Excellent CROIC<li>Excellent FCF growth<li>Margins are volatile yoy but increasing trend</ul><br />
[b]DCF Calculation</strong>: $33<br />
<br />
<strong>Graham Formula Calculation:</strong> $28.14<br />
<br />
<strong>EPV</strong>: $25.81</blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>5. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=GMCR">GMCR</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote>Sells over 100 whole bean and ground coffee selections, hot cocoa, teas and coffees in K-Cup portion packs, Keurig single-cup brewers and other accessories.</h3>The Keurig single-cup brewers may be selling like hotcakes but I still don't see how it could be worth $73 as the market implies. A pure growth stock. I do not see fundamentals supporting it at all.<br />
<br />
<strong>DCF Calculation</strong>:$4<br />
<br />
<strong>Graham Formula Calculation:</strong> $10.19 (even with a 20% growth rate!)<br />
<br />
<strong>EPV</strong>: $17.76</blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>6. Transcend Services (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=TRCR">TRCR</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote>Provides medical transcription services to the healthcare industry.<br />
<ul><li>FCF fluctuating. No growth.<li>Not a consistent performer<li>Past 4 years has seen dramatic growth</ul><br />
<br />
<strong>DCF Calculation</strong>:$12.20<br />
<br />
<strong>Graham Formula Calculation:</strong> $10.33<br />
<br />
<strong>EPV</strong>: $7.26</blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>7. Rackspace Hosting (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=RAX">RAX</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote>Business of hosting and cloud computing.<br />
Maybe I should switch my <a href="https://www.e-junkie.com/ecom/gb.php?ii=222879&c=ib&aff=93048&cl=29772" target="ejejcsingle">value investing blog</a> to Rackspace.. hmm<br />
<br />
<ul><li>IPO'd last year<li>Huge growth in customers, especially in the cloud computing area<li>Another big growth stock in a growing industry/sector<li>Not enough history and results to offer any reliable valuations</blockquote></ul></blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>8. NVE (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=NVEC">NVEC</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote>Develops and sells devices that use spintronics, a nanotechnology that relies on electron spin rather than electron charge to acquire, store and transmit information.<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Small company so the growth has been huge. Organically fast growing company.<li>FCF growth huge<li>CROIC is excellent as well<li>Tangible shareholders equity has been increasing at an incredible rate<li>Margins increasing at impressive rate</ul><br />
<strong>DCF Calculation</strong>:$37.45<br />
<br />
<strong>Graham Formula Calculation:</strong> $24.67<br />
<br />
<strong>EPV</strong>: $23.66</blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>9. American Public Education (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=APEI">APEI</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote>Provider of online postsecondary education directed at the needs of the military and public service communities.<br />
<ul><li>Short history to conclude but past 2 years has seen big improvements<li>Big FCF growth past 2-3 years<li>Tangible shareholders equity increasing<li>Issued lots of stock in 2007<li>No long term debt<li>Growing cash position<li>Big increase in margins</ul><br />
<strong>DCF Calculation</strong>:$15.55<br />
<br />
<strong>Graham Formula Calculation:</strong> In the $7-8 range<br />
<br />
<strong>EPV</strong>: $17.49</blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>10. American Science & Engineering (<a href="http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?symbol=ASEI">ASEI</a>)</strong><br />
<blockquote>Develops, manufactures, markets, and sells X-ray inspection and other detection solutions for homeland security and other targeted markets.<br />
<ul><li>Growing cash balance<li>Strong fundamental numbers<li>FCF growth excellent at 33%<li>CROIC is 13%<li>Conversion from Sales to FCF is at 12%<li>Cash from operations growth shows big increases<li>Seems to be cyclical every 3 years</ul><br />
<strong>DCF Calculation</strong>:$62.49<br />
<br />
<strong>Graham Formula Calculation:</strong> $70.01<br />
<br />
<strong>EPV</strong>: $56</blockquote><br />
<br />
<strong>Summary</strong><br />
The first 10 companies all fall into the growth stock category. As a value investor, I wouldn't be placing any bets with these companies just yet. Some look to be selling for much too high a premium.<br />
<br />
I do like ASEI as it looks to have a solid balance sheet and is able to convert its top line to the bottom.<br />
<br />
Look out for the next set of <strong>Forbes Best Small Companies</strong>.<br />
<br />
<i>Disclosure: No positions in any stocks mentioned.</i><br />
<br />
<br />
Jae Jun<br />
<a href="https://www.e-junkie.com/ecom/gb.php?ii=222879&c=ib&aff=93048&cl=29772" target="ejejcsingle">Old School Value</a><br />
<br />
<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:33:25 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/news.php?id=75374</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>View on NYB</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/iY2WUe9aKu0/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Have had it a long time. It did well in the crunch!! Too bad the stimulus plan borrowed money from China to stimulate China's economy!<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:23:07 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?2,75373,75373</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Buffett on Gold</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/ryI5hpPd4Dg/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[The book value that bought half an ounce of gold in 1979 will today buy 80 ounces, a relative gain of 16,000%.<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:56:56 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?1,75221,75372</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Re: Investment Thesis for Forest L...</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/Jax1_BND8gw/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I took a 2.5% of portfolio position in FRX in August at around $26.50. At that time, I figured the intrinsic value to be $40 based on a DCF analysis. Lack of debt and clearly competent managment were plusses. I valued current assets at around $10/share and total discounted future earnings at aorund $30/share. I estimated a rather lumpy free cash flow growth rate of average 8%. I'm at a loss to understand why Mr. Market assigns such a low value. Maybe it is getting painted with the general health care uncertainty brush. I should probably buy more.<br />
<br />
<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:45:34 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?2,75359,75371</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Re: Investment Thesis for Forest L...</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GurufocusForum/~3/XwpS_s47s80/read.php</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Thank you for sharing your analysis. <br />
<br />
One question; why is Forest Labs cheap ?<br><b>Article syndicated from <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus.com</a>, go to <a href="http://www.gurufocus.com">GuruFocus</a> for Warren Buffett's recent stock picks</b><br />
			<b><a href="https://www.gurufocus.com/membership/upgrade.php">Become GuruFocus Premium Member to See What Gurus Are Buying</a><br></b>]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:37:39 -0600</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.gurufocus.com/forum/read.php?2,75359,75370</feedburner:origLink></item>
    </channel>
</rss>
